Fecal incontinence: a practical approach to evaluation and treatment

Prospective Italian validation of the Vaizey and Wexner and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) questionnaires

Several objective severity measurement questionnaires of the fecal incontinence (FI), are available to describe type, frequency and degree of FI, and their impact on quality of life, aiming to establish baseline scores measure response to treatment over time and allow comparison among patients treated using different strategies. Presently, despite their widespread use in clinical practice, none of these questionnaire have been validated in the Italian language. The aim is to test the translated Italian version of the Vaizey and Wexner and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) questionnaires assessing their reliability and validity among Italian-speaking patients. Two researchers proficient in spoken English and Italian translated both questionnaires in the Italian language. They independently translated the two questionnaires from English and then they met to produce a single version of the two questionnaires, to solve any possible discrepancy. A forward-backward translation was then obtained by a professional bilingual translator, so as to define the final version of the questionnaires. The questionnaires were independently administered twice to 100 Italian-speaking patients by two different and independent raters. Cronbach's α of the first and second Vaizey and Wexner questionnaire was 0.755 and 0.727, respectively. While Cronbach's α of the first and second FISI questionnaire was 0.810 and 0.806, respectively. Spearman correlation and inter-rater reliability were 0.937 and 0.913 for Vaizey and Wexner questionnaire, respectively, and 0.915 and 0.871 for FISI questionnaire, respectively. Italian version of the Vaizey and Wexner and FISI questionnaires proved good consistency, reliability, reproducibility, showing good psychometric properties.

Adherence to Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Referrals in Women With Fecal Incontinence

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the incidence of patient adherence with prescribed pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in women presenting with fecal incontinence (FI) and to describe patient characteristics associated with nonadherence.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of women presenting with FI who were prescribed PFPT between January 2010 and December 2019. Adherence with PFPT was defined as either completion of documented recommended physical therapy sessions or discharge from therapy by the therapist before completion of the prescribed sessions.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 248 patients. A total of 159 (64.1%) patients attended at least 1 session of PFPT. Patients who did not attend any sessions were more likely to have a concurrent diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (69.7% vs 55.3%, P = 0.03). When controlled for confounding variables, concurrent prolapse remained associated with nonattendance (adjusted odds ratio of 1.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.3]). Of the patients who attended PFPT, the adherence rate was 32.7% (n = 50), whereas the rate was 20% for the total cohort. Nonadherent patients were more likely to have a higher body mass index (28.9 vs 26.9, P = 0.02), but this was no longer statistically significant once other patient characteristics were controlled for. Of the entire cohort, 136 (54.8%) followed up with their physicians after the initial referral to PFPT. Of the 59 patients, 43.7% were offered second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Of the women prescribed PFPT for a diagnosis of FI, approximately two thirds attended at least a single session, but only one third of those patients were adherent with the recommended therapy.

Diagnosis and management of floppy pouch complex

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the surgical treatment of choice for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis, colitis-associated dysplasia or familial adenomatous polyposis. There are various pouch disorders and associated complications. Floppy pouch complex is defined as the presence of pouch prolapse, afferent limb syndrome, enterocele, redundant loop and folding pouch on pouchoscopy, gastrografin pouchogram or defecography. Common clinical presentation includes dyschezia, bloating, abdominal pain, straining or the sense of incomplete evacuation. Each disorder has its own unique endoscopic, radiographic and manometry findings. A range of therapeutic options are available for the management of the various causes of a pouch.

Assessing the long term manometric outcomes in patients with previous laparoscopic anorectoplasty (LARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP)

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to compare the long term manometric outcomes in patients with previous laparoscopic anorectoplasty (LARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP).

METHODS

This is a single-centered retrospective study and the participants were born with various types of anorectal malformation. Manometric assessment was carried out with high-resolution anorectomanometry performed as a day procedure. In addition, a seven-itemed bowel function score (BFS) was utilized to assess the functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were included in this study (PSARP=14, LARP=16) and the median follow up periods were 15.5years and 9years in the PSARP and LARP groups respectively (p=0.06). The median value of BFS was significantly lower in the PSARP group (PSARP=12.5, range: 8-18; LARP=16, range: 10-20, p=0.03). The median value of sphincteric resting pressure was 20mmHg (range: 10-50mmHg) in the PSARP group and 40mmHg (range: 10-70mmHg) in the LARP group (p=0.05). There was no significant difference in following measurements: the percentage of patient having a normal sphincteric resting pressure (PSARP vs LARP=50% vs 75%, p=0.28); the median sphincteric squeeze pressure (PSARP vs LARP=30mmHg, range: 10-100 vs 50mmHg, range: 20-140mmHg, p=0.08); the incidence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) (PSARP vs LARP=42.9% vs 31.3%, p=0.14) and the median value for volume of air to elicit the first anal sensation (PSARP vs LARP=30ml, range: 20-60ml vs 40ml, range: 20-80ml, p=0.18).

CONCLUSION

Anorectomanometry is a useful follow up study after anorectoplasty and majority of the patients with previous LARP could retain a normal sphincteric resting pressure during long term follow up. Comparing the two surgical approaches, patients with previous LARP could achieve a higher bowel function score as well as sphincter resting pressure in manometric assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Women's views on autologous cell-based therapy for post-obstetric incontinence

AIM

Fecal and urinary incontinence are devastating consequences of obstetric-related perineal injury. The aim of the present study is to determine acceptability to parous women of autologous cell-based therapy for fecal and urinary incontinence that arises due to pelvic diaphragm tearing during vaginal childbirth.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A multiple choice questionnaire survey was offered to 76 parous women at the Maternity Unit, University College Hospital, London, UK. Seventy completed questionnaires - response rate: 92%.

RESULTS

In total, 84% of women indicated a willingness to accept autologous cell-based therapy for obstetric injury-induced incontinence rather than surgery.

CONCLUSION

These observational data provide an indication of likely acceptance of autologous cell-based therapies for birth injury incontinence and will help with designing new therapeutic approaches.

Plugs for containing faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Faecal incontinence is a distressing disorder with high social stigma. Not all people with faecal incontinence can be cured with conservative or surgical treatment and they may need to rely on containment products, such as anal plugs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of different types of anal plugs for containment of faecal incontinence.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization (WHO) ICTRP and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 26 May 2015). Reference lists of identified trials were searched and plug manufacturers were contacted for trials. No language or other limitations were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: this review was limited to randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (including crossovers) of anal plug use for the management of faecal incontinence.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

children and adults with faecal incontinence.Types of interventions: any type of anal plug. Comparison interventions might include no treatment, conservative (physical) treatments, nutritional interventions, surgery, pads and other types or sizes of plugs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data from the included trials. Authors of all included trials were contacted for clarification concerning methodological issues.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 136 participants were included. Two studies compared the use of plugs versus no plugs, one study compared two sizes of the same brand of plug, and one study compared two brands of plugs. In all included studies there was considerable dropout (in total 48 (35%) dropped out before the end of the study) for varying reasons. Data presented are thus subject to potential bias. 'Pseudo-continence' was, however, achieved by some of those who continued to use plugs, at least in the short-term. In a comparison of two different types of plug, plug loss was less often reported and overall satisfaction was greater during use of polyurethane plugs than polyvinyl-alcohol plugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available data were limited and incomplete, and not all pre-specified outcomes could be evaluated. Consequently, only tentative conclusions are possible. The available data suggest that anal plugs can be difficult to tolerate. However, if they are tolerated they can be helpful in preventing incontinence. Plugs could then be useful in a selected group of people either as a substitute for other forms of management or as an adjuvant treatment option. Plugs come in different designs and sizes; the review showed that the selection of the type of plug can impact on its performance.

Early functional results of biofeedback and its impact on quality of life of patients with anal incontinence

CONTEXT

Biofeedback has been used successfully in the treatment of fecal incontinence, working mainly on rehabilitation of the sphincter muscle. However, there are few studies presenting objective results of biofeedback, in terms of functional results and those related to the quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study was to evaluate the immediate results of biofeedback in the treatment of fecal incontinence and its impact on the quality of life of patients by using validated questionnaires, correlating the results with those related to functional parameters of quality of life and clinical variables.

METHODS

We analyzed and compared the results of biofeedback in 52 patients with fecal incontinence before the start of the sessions and immediately after the end of them, by applying validated questionnaires assessing the degree of intensity of fecal incontinence (FISI - Fecal Incontinence Severity Index) and evaluation of quality of life related to fecal incontinence (FIQL - Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale) as compared to clinical variables (age, onset of symptoms, etiology of the fecal incontinence, number of sessions of biofeedback and number and types of deliveries).

RESULTS

The evaluation of the results of FISI showed a significant increase in the number of individuals who had low severity scores of symptoms before and after the biofeedback (from 48.1 to 65.4%) with P = 0.004. There was significant improvements in domains of the FIQL, behavior (P = 0.008), depression (P = 0.006) and embarrassment (P = 0.008) after biofeedback. There was no significant correlation between the improvement of functional parameters evaluated by FISI and the improvement of quality of life. Positive correlation was found between the improvements of the domains of FIQL. There was no significant correlation between the results obtained using the FISI and FIQL with clinical variables assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Biofeedback has proven to be an effective therapy in the treatment of fecal incontinence, improving symptoms and/or quality of life for most patients, regardless of clinical presentation of this functional disorder.

Plugs for containing faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Faecal incontinence is a distressing disorder with high social stigma. Not all people with faecal incontinence can be cured with conservative or surgical treatment and they may need to rely on containment products, such as anal plugs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of different types of anal plugs for containment of faecal incontinence.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (searched 29 February 2012). Reference lists of identified trials were searched and plugs manufacturers were contacted for trials. No language or other limitations were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: This review was limited to randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (including crossovers) of anal plug use for the management of faecal incontinence.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

Children and adults with faecal incontinence.Types of interventions: Any type of anal plug. Comparison interventions might include no treatment, conservative (physical) treatments, nutritional interventions, surgery, pads and other types or sizes of plugs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data from the included trials. Authors of all included trials were contacted for clarification concerning methodological issues.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 136 participants were included. Two studies compared the use of plugs versus no plugs, one study compared two sizes of the same brand of plug, and one study compared two brands of plugs. In all included studies there was considerable dropout (in total 48 (35%) dropped out before the end of the study) for varying reasons. Data presented are thus subject to potential bias. 'Pseudo-continence' was, however, achieved by some of those who continued to use plugs, at least in the short-term. In a comparison of two different types of plug, plug loss was less often reported and overall satisfaction was greater during use of polyurethane plugs than polyvinyl-alcohol plugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available data were limited and incomplete, and not all pre-specified outcomes could be evaluated. Consequently, only tentative conclusions are possible. The available data suggest that anal plugs can be difficult to tolerate. However, if they are tolerated they can be helpful in preventing incontinence. Plugs could then be useful in a selected group of people either as a substitute for other forms of management or as an adjuvant treatment option. Plugs come in different designs and sizes; the review showed that the selection of the type of plug can impact on its performance.

The relationship between etiology, symptom severity and indications of surgery in cases of anal incontinence: a 25-year analysis of 1,046 patients at a tertiary coloproctology practice

BACKGROUND

The etiology of anal incontinence (AI) is often multifactorial. There is little data on the relationship between the etiology of AI, symptom severity, and the need for surgery. The aim of our study was to investigate this association in a large number of unselected patients with AI referred to a tertiary specialist coloproctological practice.

METHODS

Patients with AI seen at our unit between 1983 and 2008 were analyzed. The main etiologies were categorized as congenital, traumatic, neurologic, idiopathic, post-operative, post-obstetric, secondary to rectal prolapse, or inflammatory bowel disease. The severity of AI was graded using the validated Pescatori incontinence scale.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,046 patients were studied. The AI score was higher in patients with congenital (4.7 ± 1.1), traumatic (4.6 ± 1.4), and neurological (4.4 ± 1.2) incontinence. Surgical treatment was indicated in 214 cases (20.5%). Patients with AI related to trauma and congenital anomalies required surgery in 43.5 and 31.4% of cases, respectively, a percentage significantly higher than that for patients with other etiologies (P = 0.002). Prolapse-related AI usually responded to correction of the prolapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with congenital, traumatic, and neurological AI tend to have greater symptom severity. Traumatic, rectal prolapse-related, and congenital AI cases more often require surgery.

Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review all published evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of injectable bulking agents for passive faecal incontinence (FI) in adults.

METHOD

Electronic searches were performed for MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge and other relevant databases. Hand searching of relevant conference proceedings was undertaken. Studies were considered if they met the predefined inclusion criteria of more than ten adult patients and receiving an injectable bulking agent for passive FI with a validated means of assessing preoperative and postoperative incontinence.

RESULTS

Thirteen case series studies and one randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) were included with a total of 420 patients. Two completed RCTs with placebo control were identified but results were unobtainable. Coaptite, Contigen, Durasphere, EVOH and PTQ injections were assessed with 24, 73, 83, 21 and 208 patients respectively. Most studies reported a statistically significant improvement in incontinence scores and quality of life. No statistically significant difference was found between the treatment and placebo arms in the RCT. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently there is little evidence for the effectiveness of injectable bulking agents in managing passive FI. The inability to obtain results from two further RCTs concerned the reviewers and hindered their ability to make strong recommendations. The identified injectable bulking agents appear to be safe with only minor complications reported.

Bowel management for the treatment of pediatric fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is a devastating underestimated problem, affecting a large number of individuals all over the world. Most of the available literature relates to the management of adults. The treatments proposed are not uniformly successful and have little application in the pediatric population. This paper presents the experience of 30 years, implementing a bowel management program, for the treatment of fecal incontinence in over 700 pediatric patients, with a success rate of 95%. The main characteristics of the program include the identification of the characteristics of the colon of each patient; finding the specific type of enema that will clean that colon and the radiological monitoring of the process.

Anal pressure in experimental diabetes

PURPOSE

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic endocrine disorder that affects many systems, the gastrointestinal system often being among the affected systems. This experimental study work was designed to demonstrate altered anal sphincter pressures in an experimental model of diabetes mellitus (DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Wistar rats (mean weight = 250 g) were used and randomized in two groups (n = 10): CO = control and DM. DM was induced by administering a single dose of streptozotocin. Glycemic levels were measured at the start (time = 0) and end (time = 60) of the experiment and anorectal manometry at the end.

RESULTS

DM rats presented a significant increase in glycemia at day 60 (DM = 407.14 +/- 73.76) as compared to the control group (time 0 = 175.7 +/- 18.62 and time 60 = 198.04 +/- 28.66). Anorectal manometry showed a significant decrease in anal pressure in the DM group at day 60 (DM = 34.2 +/- 4.97) as compared to the CO group at the same time (CO = 67.4 +/- 2.06), with P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 (Student's t test).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that DM, due to the high glycemic levels, lead to alterations such as anal sphincter hypotony, which may cause complications such as fecal incontinence.

Management of skin conditions in the older population 2

This is the second of two papers covering assessment and management of elderly skin. Part 1 of this clinical review focused on the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the skin and a detailed clinical history of the patient (Bianchi and Cameron, 2008). This second paper considers some common dermatological conditions seen in the older adult and explores suitable management strategies.

Fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence (FI) has a significant social and economic impact on the patient and the community. In women, obstetric injury is commonly associated with the development of FI. Understanding FI is aided by a good knowledge of the pelvic floor anatomy and continence mechanisms. This same knowledge along with a good history and physical can guide the physician in selecting appropriate studies and treatment options. Surgical treatment of FI is currently the best option when a sphincter defect exists. The long-term prognosis of the repair is disappointing, however. Ongoing investigations continue in the hopes of getting closer to a cure and to reclaiming the patient's former quality of life.

Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted?

PURPOSE

Pelvic-floor rehabilitation does not provide the same degree of relief in all fecal incontinent patients. We aimed at studying prospectively the ability of tests to predict the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred fifty consecutive patients (228 women) underwent medical history and a standardized series of tests, including physical examination, anal manometry, pudendal nerve latency testing, anal sensitivity testing, rectal capacity measurement, defecography, endoanal sonography, and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, patients were referred for pelvic-floor rehabilitation. Outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation was quantified by the Vaizey incontinence score. Linear regression analyses were used to identify candidate predictors and to construct a multivariable prediction model for the posttreatment Vaizey score.

RESULTS

After pelvic-floor rehabilitation, the mean baseline Vaizey score (18, SD+/-3) was reduced with 3.2 points (p<0.001). In addition to the baseline Vaizey score, three elements from medical history were significantly associated with the posttreatment Vaizey score (presence of passive incontinence, thin stool consistency, primary repair of a rupture after vaginal delivery at childbed) (R2, 0.18). The predictive value was significantly but marginally improved by adding the following test results: perineal and/or perianal scar tissue (physical examination), and maximal squeeze pressure (anal manometry; R2, 0.20; p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Additional tests have a limited role in predicting success of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence.

Fecal incontinence: a review

Fecal incontinence (FI) is defined as the involuntary passage of fecal material through the anal canal. True incontinence must be differentiated from pseudo incontinence. FI is predominately a disease of the elderly or of institutional patients. Fecal incontinence in the nursing home population has been estimated at 47%. We provide a guide to appropriate clinical evaluation, diagnostic testing, and treatment of FI.

Optimizing electrode implantation in sacral nerve stimulation--an anatomical cadaver study controlled by a laparoscopic camera

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation is the therapy of choice in patients with neurogenic faecal and urine incontinence, constipation and some pelvic pain syndromes. The aim of this study is to determine the best insertion angles of the electrode under laparoscopic visualization of the sacral nerves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five fresh cadaver pelvises were dissected through an anterior approach of the presacral space, exposing the ventral sacral roots. Needles and electrodes were inserted into the S3 foramen. Both right and left sides were used, with the traditional percutaneous procedure. The validation was done by a laparoscopic camera controlling the position of the needle and electrode on the nerve. The angles were assessed with a goniometer and were confirmed in two living patients.

RESULTS

The mean angle of insertion in the sagittal plane was 62.9+/-3 degrees (range, 59-70). In the axial plane, the mean angle for the left side was 91.7+/-13.5 degrees (range, 80-110) and 83.2+/-7.7 degrees for the right side (range, 75-95). These angles resulted in the optimal placement of the leads along the S3 sacral root, in all these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study allows direct visualization during the placement of the needle and electrode, thus permitting accurate calculations of the best angle of approach during the surgical procedure in sacral nerve stimulation. These objective findings attempt to standardize this technique, which is often performed with the aid of intra-operative fluoroscopy but still leaving a lot to chance. These insertion angles should help to find more consistent and reproducible results and thus improved outcome in patients.

Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Anal inspection and digital rectal examination are routinely performed in fecal incontinent patients but it is not clear to what extent they contribute to the diagnostic work-up. We examined if and how findings of anal inspection and rectal examination are associated with anorectal function tests and endoanal ultrasonography.

METHODS

A cohort of fecal incontinent patients (n=312, 90% females; mean age 59) prospectively underwent anal inspection and rectal examination. Findings were compared with results of anorectal function tests and endoanal ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Absent, decreased and normal resting and squeeze pressures at rectal examination correlated to some extent with mean (+/-SD) manometric findings: mean resting pressure 41.3 (+/-20), 43.8 (+/-20) and 61.6 (+/-23) Hg (p<0.001); incremental squeeze pressure 20.6 (+/-20), 38.4 (+/-31) and 62.4 (+/-34) Hg (p<0.001). External anal sphincter defects at rectal examination were confirmed with endoanal ultrasonography for defects <90 degrees in 36% (37/103); for defects between 90-150 degrees in 61% (20/33); for defects between 150-270 degrees in 100% (6/6). Patients with anal scar tissue at anal inspection had lower incremental squeeze pressures (p=0.04); patients with a gaping anus had lower resting pressures (p=0.013) at anorectal manometry. All other findings were not related to any anorectal function test or endoanal ultrasonography.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal inspection and digital rectal examination can give accurate information about internal and external anal sphincter function but are inaccurate for determining external anal sphincter defects <90 degrees. Therefore, a sufficient diagnostic work-up should comprise at least rectal examination, anal inspection and endoanal ultrasonography.

External anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: comparison of endoanal MR imaging and endoanal US

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare in a multicenter study the agreement between endoanal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and endoanal ultrasonography (US) in depicting external anal sphincter (EAS) defects in patients with fecal incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of all participating centers. A total of 237 consenting patients (214 women, 23 men; mean age, 58.6 years +/- 13 [standard deviation]) with fecal incontinence were examined from 13 different hospitals by using endoanal MR imaging and endoanal US. Patients with an anterior EAS defect depicted on endoanal MR images and/or endoanal US scans underwent anal sphincter repair. Surgical findings were used as the reference standard in the determination of anterior EAS defects. The Cohen kappa statistic and McNemar test were used to calculate agreement and differences between diagnostic techniques.

RESULTS

Agreement between endoanal MR imaging and endoanal US was fair for the depiction of sphincter defects (kappa = 0.24 [95% confidence interval: 0.12, 0.36]). At surgery, EAS defects were found in 31 (86%) of 36 patients. There was no significant difference between MR imaging and US in the depiction of sphincter defects (P = .23). Sensitivity and positive predictive value were 81% and 89%, respectively, for endoanal MR imaging and 90% and 85%, respectively, for endoanal US.

CONCLUSION

In the selection of patients for anal sphincter repair, both endoanal MR imaging and endoanal US are sensitive tools for preoperative assessment, and both techniques can be used to depict surgically repairable anterior EAS defects.

Clinical presentation of fecal incontinence and anorectal function: what is the relationship?

OBJECTIVES

Fecal incontinence is classified into various types: passive, urge, and combined. Its clinical presentation is thought to be related to the underlying physiological or anatomical abnormality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the associations between the frequency of clinical symptoms and anatomic and functional characteristics of the anorectum of patients with severe fecal incontinence.

METHODS

Associations were explored in a consecutive series of 162 patients (91% women, mean age 59 [SD +/- 12] yr) with a mean Vaizey incontinence score of 18 (SD +/- 3).

RESULTS

Urge incontinence was reported as "daily" by 55%, "often" by 27%, and "sometimes" by 7% of all patients. No significant associations were observed between the frequency of urge incontinence and either manometric data, anal mucosal sensitivity testing, or defects of internal anal sphincter (IAS) or external anal sphincter (EAS). A significant relation was observed between the frequency of urge incontinence and maximal tolerable volume (P= 0.03) and atrophy of the EAS (P= 0.05). Passive incontinence was reported as "daily" by 14%, "often" by 30%, and "sometimes" by 14% of all patients. Resting and maximal squeeze pressure were both associated (P < 0.001) with the frequency of passive incontinence. No relationship could be detected between clinical presentation and rectal sensation, anal mucosal sensitivity, defects, or atrophy of IAS or EAS.

CONCLUSION

Most patients reported combined incontinence (59%) and underlying pathophysiologic abnormalities were identified. The hypothesized associations between urge and passive incontinence and functional and anatomical impairment of the anorectum are less clear-cut than previously assumed. Patients presenting with fecal incontinence should undergo physiologic investigation.

Obstetric-induced incontinence: A black hole of preventable morbidity

There is a detailed literature comprising clinical and anorectal physiological studies linking faecal incontinence to vaginal delivery. Specific risk factors are high infant birthweight, forceps delivery and prolonged second stage of labour. The onset of symptoms may be delayed for many years. Faecal incontinence occurs in more than 10% of adult females and urinary incontinence in about a third of multiparous women. This places a very large economic burden on the Australian health system. A conservative estimate for overall management of incontinence would be in excess of $A700 million but the actual amount is unknown. Preventative measures for avoiding pelvic floor injuries need to be established, and safe obstetric practice needs to be redefined in the light of current knowledge about incontinence. Outcome measures for safe birthing should not only include infant and maternal mortality and infant morbidity, but should also include the long-term effects of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor, particularly urinary and faecal incontinence. Several state reports and one federal senate report on safe birthing have been lacking in this area. The safety of birthing centres and home birthing needs to be examined to provide birthing mothers with complete and appropriate information about safety in order that they may consider their options. Appropriate Caesarean section rates for optimal birthing safety are unknown and need to be re-examined. Calls for overall reduction in Caesarean section rates in Australia are inappropriate and cannot be justified until the effects of pelvic floor injury are added to the overall assessment.

Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapy is a common treatment option in patients with fecal incontinence. Although physiotherapy may result in relief of symptoms, to what extent improvement is associated with changes in anorectal function is still unclear.

AIM

The aim of the present study was to investigate prospectively how anorectal function changes with physiotherapy and whether these changes are related to changes in fecal incontinence score.

METHODS

Consenting consecutive patients (n=266) with fecal incontinence (91% women; mean age, 59 years) underwent anorectal manometry, anal and rectal mucosal sensitivity measurements, and rectal capacity measurement at baseline and after nine sessions of standardized pelvic floor physiotherapy. These findings were compared with changes in Vaizey incontinence score.

RESULTS

On follow-up 3 months after physiotherapy, squeeze pressure (p=0.028), as well as urge sensation threshold (p=0.046) and maximum tolerable volume (p=0.018), had increased significantly. The extent of improvement was not related to age, duration of fecal incontinence, menopause, and endosonography findings. All other anorectal functions did not change. An improvement in the Vaizey score was moderately correlated with an increase in incremental squeeze pressure (r=0.14, p=0.04) and a decrease in anal mucosal sensitivity threshold (r=0.20, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Physiotherapy improves squeeze pressure, urge sensation, and maximum tolerable volume. However, improved anorectal function does not always result in a decrease in fecal incontinence complaints.

Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients

PURPOSE

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is an appealing treatment for patients with fecal incontinence but reported results vary. This study was designed to assess the outcome of pelvic floor rehabilitation in a large series of consecutive patients with fecal incontinence caused by different etiologies.

METHODS

A total of 281 patients (252 females) were included. Data about medical history, anal manometry, rectal capacity measurement, and endoanal sonography were collected. Subgroups of patients were defined by anal sphincter complex integrity, and nature and possible underlying causes of fecal incontinence. Subsequently patients were referred for pelvic floor rehabilitation, comprising nine sessions of electric stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback. Pelvic floor rehabilitation outcome was documented with Vaizey score, anal manometry, and rectal capacity measurement findings.

RESULTS

Vaizey score improved from baseline in 143 of 239 patients (60 percent), remained unchanged in 56 patients (23 percent), and deteriorated in 40 patients (17 percent). Mean Vaizey score reduced with 3.2 points (P < 0.001). A Vaizey score reduction of >or= 50 percent was observed in 32 patients (13 percent). Mean squeeze pressure (+5.1 mmHg; P = 0.04) and maximal tolerated volume (+11 ml; P = 0.01) improved from baseline. Resting pressure (P = 0.22), sensory threshold (P = 0.52), and urge sensation (P = 0.06) remained unchanged. Subgroup analyses did not show substantial differences in effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation between subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic floor rehabilitation leads overall to a modest improvement in severity of fecal incontinence, squeeze pressure, and maximal tolerated volume. Only in a few patients, a substantial improvement of the baseline Vaizey score was observed. Further studies are needed to identify patients who most likely will benefit from pelvic floor rehabilitation.

Community-based recruitment and enrollment for a clinical trial on the sensitive issue of fecal incontinence: the Fiber study

The recruitment of community-living participants for clinical trials of sensitive topics, when the population is largely hidden and reluctant to self-identify, and the study protocols and procedures intensive, creates significant challenges to researchers. The Fiber Study is an ongoing randomized controlled clinical trial conducted to compare the effectiveness of three dietary fibers with different levels of fermentability for symptom management in community-living adults with fecal incontinence. The researchers developed a staged approach to recruitment using three primary recruitment methods and a three-phase approach to the enrollment process. We have been successful in reaching, recruiting, and enrolling participants in a clinical trial, as well as in effectively managing study resources and staff time.

Fecal incontinence in females older than aged 40 years: who is at risk?

PURPOSE

This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of, and identify risk factors associated with, fecal incontinence in racially diverse females older than aged 40 years.

METHODS

The Reproductive Risks for Incontinence Study at Kaiser is a population-based study of 2,109 randomly selected middle-aged and older females (average age, 56 years). Fecal incontinence, determined by self-report, was categorized by frequency. Females reported the level of bother of fecal incontinence and their general quality of life. Potential risk factors were assessed by self-report, interview, physical examination, and record review. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent association between selected risk factors and the primary outcome of any reported fecal incontinence in the past year.

RESULTS

Fecal incontinence in the past year was reported by 24 percent of females (3.4 percent monthly, 1.9 percent weekly, and 0.2 percent daily). Greater frequency of fecal incontinence was associated with decreased quality of life (Medical Outcome Short Form-36 Mental Component Scale score, P = 0.01), and increased bother (P < 0.001) with 45 percent of females with fecal incontinence in the past year and 100 percent of females with daily fecal incontinence reporting moderate or great bother. In multivariate analysis, the prevalence of fecal incontinence in the past year increased significantly [odds ratio per 5 kg/m2 (95 percent confidence interval)] with obesity [1.2 (1.1-1.3)], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [1.9 (1.3-2.9)], irritable bowel syndrome [2.4 (1.7-3.4)], urinary incontinence [2.1 (1.7-2.6)], and colectomy [1.9 (1.1-3.1)]. Latina females were less likely to report fecal incontinence than white females [0.6 (0.4-0.9)].

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal incontinence, a common problem for females, is associated with substantial adverse affects on quality of life. Several of the identified risk factors are preventable or modifiable, and may direct future research in fecal incontinence therapy.

The current role of imaging techniques in faecal incontinence

Faecal incontinence is a common multifactorial disorder. Major causes of faecal incontinence are related to vaginal delivery and prior anorectal surgery. In addition to medical history and physical examination, several anorectal functional tests and imaging techniques can be used to assess the underlying pathophysiology and to guide treatment planning in faecal incontinent patients. Anorectal functional tests provide functional information, but the potential strength comes from combining test results. Imaging techniques, including defecography, endoanal sonography, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, provide structural information about the anorectal region with a direct clinical impact. The major role of imaging techniques in faecal incontinence is visualising the structural and functional integrity of the anal sphincter complex. Both two-dimensional endoanal sonography and endoanal MR imaging are accurate tools to depict anal sphincter defects. The major advantage of endoanal MR imaging is the accurate demonstration of external anal sphincter atrophy. Recent studies have suggested that external phased array MR imaging and three-dimensional endoanal sonography are also valuable tools in the diagnostic work up of faecal incontinence. Decisions about the preferred technique will mainly be determined by availability and local expertise. This article demonstrates the current role of tests, predominantly imaging tests, in the diagnostic work up of faecal incontinence.

Relationship between external anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical, functional, and anatomic characteristics in patients with fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

External anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal magnetic resonance imaging has been associated with poor outcome of anal sphincter repair. We studied the relationship between external anal sphincter atrophy on endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical, functional, and anatomic characteristics in patients with fecal incontinence.

METHODS

In 200 patients (mean Vaizey score, 18 (+/-2.9 standard deviation)) magnetic resonance images were evaluated for external anal sphincter atrophy (none, mild, or severe) by radiologists blinded to anorectal functional test results and details from medical history. Subgroups of patients with and without atrophy were compared for medical history, anal manometry, pudendal nerve latency testing, anal sensitivity testing, external anal sphincter thickness, and external anal sphincter defects. Whenever significant differences were detected, we tested for differences between patients with mild and severe atrophy.

RESULTS

External anal sphincter atrophy was demonstrated in 123 patients (62 percent): graded as mild in 79 (40 percent), and severe in 44 patients (22 percent). Patients with atrophy were more often female (P < 0.001) and older (P = 0.003). They had a lower maximal squeeze (P = 0.01) and squeeze increment pressure (P < 0.001). Patients with severe atrophy had a lower maximal squeeze (P = 0.003) and squeeze increment pressure (P < 0.001) than patients with mild atrophy. These effects were not attenuated by potential confounding variables. Patients with atrophy could not be identified a priori by other characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

External anal sphincter atrophy at endoanal magnetic resonance imaging was depicted in 62 percent of patients, varying from mild to severe. Because increasing levels of atrophy were associated with impaired squeeze function, further studies are needed to evaluate whether grading atrophy is clinically valuable in selecting patients for anal sphincter repair.

Prospective comparison of short- and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings

OBJECTIVE

The influence of irradiation on the clinical severity of incontinence, sphincter function, morphologic features and short/long-term treatment effects of sphincter training therapy is still insufficiently understood in irradiated patients with fecal incontinence after surgery for colorectal cancer. These parameters were compared in irradiated and non-irradiated patients and followed prospectively with regard to short- and long-term training effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-one patients having been irradiated after surgery (50.0+/-5.0 Gy) and 54 non-irradiated patients with fecal incontinence participated in this prospective, non-randomized trial. Baseline evaluation included a semiquantitative severity assessment score of fecal incontinence (modified Cleveland Incontinence Score (MCIS)), rectal manometry and endoscopy. After 3 weeks (short term) of intensive in-hospital pelvic floor exercise combined with biofeedback training, a second evaluation was made. In addition, anal endosonography (EUS) was performed in cases of treatment failure. After one year (long term) a third evaluation was made clinically (MCIS score).

RESULTS

Irradiated patients presented with a significantly higher degree of fecal incontinence (lower MCIS) compared to non-irradiated patients: 7.4+/-2.2 versus 8.7+/-2.7 points (p<0.001). Rectosigmoidal inflammation was more frequent in irradiated than non-irradiated patients (26.9% versus 9.3%) (p<0.03). Sphincter pressure, sensation/pain threshold and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex were similar in both groups. A significant short-term training effect was observed in both groups following sphincter training therapy in terms of an increase in MCIS from 7.4+/-2.2 to 9.4+/-2.7 points in the irradiated group and from 8.7+/-2.7 to 11.4+/-2.5 points in the non-irradiated group (p<0.0001). After one year the scores were 8.2+/-3.8 and 10.7+/-4.4 points, respectively (p<0.0001). There was a significant correlation (p<0.001) between baseline MCIS and the short- and long-term MCIS. In patients with short-term treatment failure (16.6%) anal EUS revealed structural defects of the external sphincter in four patients. There was no association of sphincter diameter with sphincter pressure, sensation/pain threshold and short/long-term MCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

The main result of this study is that irradiated patients show short- and long-term training effects comparable with those of non-irradiated patients despite the higher degree of incontinence at baseline. The correlation between the initial MCIS and short- and long-term treatment effects may be regarded as an important clinical predictor for treatment outcome. Functional and morphologic features are less suitable for this purpose.

Extracorporeal magnetic stimulation of the pelvic floor: impact on anorectal function and physiology. A pilot study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the effect of extracorporeal magnetic stimulation on anorectal function and physiology.

METHODS

A pilot study comparing the physiology of ten incontinent (9 females) and five continent (4 females) patients with and without perineal magnetic stimulation (10 Hz and 50 Hz) was performed. The ten incontinent patients were treated with two sessions weekly for five weeks of perineal magnetic stimulation. At treatment completion, precontinent and postcontinent scores and resting and squeeze anal pressure were compared. Patients also reported symptom improvement and satisfaction on a linear analog scale.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 57 years. Sitting resting and squeeze anal pressures were significantly greater than lying pressures (P = 0.007, 0.047). Both 10-Hz and 50-Hz stimulation effected a significant increase in anal pressures compared with the baseline resting pressure (P = 0.005). The baseline squeeze pressures were significantly higher than the stimulated pressures compared with 50-Hz pressures (P = 0.022). After six weeks of treatment, there was a statistically significant increase in resting and squeeze anal pressures and a significant decrease in continence scores (P = 0.007, P = 0.008, P = 0.017). The mean percentage subjective improvement was 16 percent, and the mean patient satisfaction score was 3.3, positively correlating with an improvement in the continence score.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal magnetic stimulation results in a significant increase in anal resting pressure irrespective of pretreatment continence. Although the subjective improvement in continence after treatment is small, there is a significant improvement in both resting pressures and patient continence scores.

Plugs for containing faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Faecal incontinence is a distressing disorder with high social stigma. Not all people with faecal incontinence can be cured with conservative or surgical treatment and they may need to rely on containment products, such as anal plugs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the performance of different types of anal plugs for containment of faecal incontinence.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (searched 22 November 2004), MEDLINE (January 1966 to November 2004), CINAHL (January 1982 to November Week 3 2004), EMBASE (January 1996 to 2004 Week 47), INVERT (Dutch nursing database) (January 1993 to November 2004) and Web of Science (January 1988 to November 2004). Reference lists of identified trials were searched and plugs manufacturers were contacted for trials. No language or other limitations were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: This review was limited to randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (including crossovers) of anal plug use for the management of faecal incontinence.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

Children and adults with faecal incontinence. Types of interventions: Any type of anal plug. Comparison interventions might include no treatment, conservative (physical) treatments, nutritional interventions, surgery, pads and other types or sizes of plugs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data from the included trials. Authors of all included trials were contacted for clarification concerning methodological issues.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 136 participants were included. Two studies compared the use of plugs versus no plugs, one study compared two sizes of the same brand of plug, and one study compared two brands of plugs. In all included studies there was considerable dropout (in total 48 (35%) dropped out before the end of the study) for varying reasons. Data presented are thus subject to potential bias. 'Pseudo-continence' was, however, achieved by some of those who continued to use plugs, at least in the short-term. In a comparison of two different types of plug, plug loss was less often reported and overall satisfaction was greater during use of polyurethane plugs than polyvinyl-alcohol plugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available data were limited and incomplete, and not all pre-specified outcomes could be evaluated. Consequently, only tentative conclusions are possible. The available data suggest that anal plugs can be difficult to tolerate. However, if they are tolerated they can be helpful in preventing incontinence. Plugs could then be useful in a selected group of people either as a substitute for other forms of management or as an adjuvant treatment option. Plugs come in different designs and sizes; the review showed that the selection of the type of plug can impact on its performance.

Defecographic disorders in anal incontinent women: relation to symptoms and anal endosonographic patterns

OBJECTIVE

The need for a defecography in incontinent women is still debatable. We prospectively evaluated the prevalence of defecographic abnormalities in incontinent women in order to determine whether any symptom or endosonographic findings could be associated with a particular defecographic pattern.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty incontinent women (aged 30-87 years) underwent defecography and anal endosonography to look for pelvic floor descent, rectocele, intussusception, enterocele and the presence of anal sphincter defects. Other symptoms, i.e. straining at stools and pelvic pressure, were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases of external sphincter defect (12 associated with an internal defect) and 4 cases of isolated internal defect were identified. Defecography identified 25 patients with perineal descent at rest, 28 with perineal descent at straining, 30 with rectocele, 30 with intussusception and 14 with enterocele. Three defecographies were normal. In the 29 women with sphincter defects, the prevalence of defecographic abnormalities did not differ from that observed in the 21 women without sphincter defects. In women complaining of straining at stools (n=26) or idiopathic pelvic pressure (n=32), the prevalence of defecographic abnormalities did not differ from that observed in women who did not have these symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in incontinent women was similar whether associated symptoms or anal sphincter defects were present or not. When defecography has to be performed to investigate female anal incontinence, neither clinical nor endosonographic features can predict a higher diagnostic efficiency.

Directions for Future Nursing Research on Fecal Incontinence

BACKGROUND

As knowledge of the prevalence and impact of fecal incontinence increases, additional research is needed to improve patient outcomes and support the practice of nurses in this area.

OBJECTIVES

To outline needs for future nursing research on fecal incontinence in aging adults.

METHODS

Existing literature about fecal incontinence was analyzed to generate a plan for future research.

RESULTS

Recommendations for investigation were proposed in the following areas: mechanisms underlying fecal incontinence and common to fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence; assessment of fecal incontinence; management strategies; and tracking a patient's response to fecal incontinence therapies across the healthcare system. Other areas of study identified as priorities included lessening the psychological burden of fecal incontinence, preventing perineal skin problems with appropriate skin care protocols and products, and developing efficacious nursing home routines and environments.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the capacity of nursing research focused on fecal incontinence through funding support and recruitment incentives for new investigators is essential to achieve the proposed agenda.

Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology

Ultrasound is a supplementary, indispensable diagnostic procedure in urogynecology; perineal, introital, and endoanal ultrasound are the most recommended techniques. The position and mobility of the bladder neck can be demonstrated. In patients undergoing diagnostic work-up for urge symptoms, ultrasound occasionally demonstrates urethral diverticula, leiomyomas, and cysts in the vaginal wall. These findings will lead to further diagnostic assessment. The same applies to the demonstration of bladder diverticula, foreign bodies in the bladder, and bullous edema. With endoanal ultrasound, different parts of the sphincter ani muscle can be evaluated. Recommendations for the standardized use of urogenital ultrasound are given.

Avaliação da qualidade de vida na incontinência anal: validação do questionário FIQL (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life)

RACIONAL: A incontinência anal acarreta incapacitação física e psicológica, determinando impacto na qualidade de vida. Para quantificar esse impacto em nosso meio, não existem instrumentos específicos validados. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a qualidade de vida na incontinência anal, através da validação do questionário "Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life" (FIQL), que é composto por 29 questões distribuídas em 4 domínios: estilo de vida, comportamento, depressão e constrangimento, sua escala de pontuação varia de 1 a 4 com exceção das questões 1 e 4 que variam de 1 a 5 e 1 a 6, respectivamente. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Após tradução e adaptação cultural, estudou-se a validação do instrumento através das propriedades de medida de reprodutibilidade e validade. Para a avaliação da reprodutibilidade aplicou-se o questionário em 50 pacientes com incontinência anal por dois examinadores, sendo reaplicado por um dos examinadores após período de 7 a 10 dias. A validade construtiva foi testada através da comparação do FIQL e o SF-36, questionário genérico de qualidade de vida e entre o FIQL e um índice de incontinência anal. O índice de incontinência anal utilizado foi o de Jorge-Wexner, que varia de 0 (continência perfeita) a 20 (incontinência total). A validade discriminativa foi avaliada através da aplicação do FIQL em dois grupos controle: indivíduos voluntários hígidos e portadores de constipação intestinal. RESULTADOS: Verificou-se que o FIQL apresentou correlação significativa com outros instrumentos (SF-36 e índice de incontinência) e que a qualidade de vida no portador de incontinência anal está comprometida em todos os domínios: estilo de vida: 2,4 comportamento: 2,0, depressão: 2,5 e constrangimento: 1,9, quando comparado com os indivíduos voluntários hígidos (3,9, 3,9, 4,1 e 4,0), e pacientes com constipação intestinal (3,7, 3,8, 3,6 e 3,8), respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: O FIQL é útil para a avaliação da qualidade de vida na incontinência anal em nossa população.

Novel surgical approaches to fecal incontinence: neurostimulation and artificial anal sphincter

Neurostimulation, neosphincters with neurostimulation, and implanted artificial sphincters are recently developed therapeutic options for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence. Of these approaches, sacral nerve electric stimulation appears to be the most promising because of its relative simplicity and low morbidity. However, it is best suited for patients with anatomically intact sphincters. The other procedures target patients with gross structural defects in the sphincter but are still in their infancy. In this article we discuss these techniques and review their rationale, mechanisms of action, indications, outcomes, and complications.

Fecal incontinence: evaluation and treatment

Fecal incontinence affects men and women of all ages, leading to personal disability and high financial costs. The evaluation of the patient should clarify the pathophysiology of the symptoms and provide guidance in choosing the appropriate treatment. A comprehensive history and physical examination including endoscopic assessment is able to identify the cause of most cases of fecal incontinence. If necessary, functional methods can be used to confirm the diagnosis. Patient selection for suitable treatment is most important and should be based on clinical and physiologic findings. Conservative dietary or medical treatment is often effective, when the symptoms are mild. Biofeedback therapy is effective in most patients. It has no side effects and is well tolerated. Structural damage to the anus may be repaired by surgery, like sphincter repair, the best treatment of selective sphincter defects. Neoanal sphincters and artificial sphincters are the last possibility after failed surgery and before colostomy. They are less attractive because of technical difficulties and low success rate. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment has the potential to improve the outcome for patients with fecal incontinence.

Second-line treatment for faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of faecal incontinence, more than 30% of patients experience continuation of their problem. We discuss new therapeutic procedures for dealing with faecal incontinence.

METHODS

Discussion of authors' own work in relation to the literature.

RESULTS

First-line care includes diets, constipating drugs, biofeedback therapy, anal repair and operations for prolapse and fistulas. For the failures of these first-line treatments there is hope with second-line therapies. Creation of a neosphincter is possible with a dynamic graciloplasty (DGP) or an artificial bowel sphincter (ABS). A DGP is a conventional graciloplasty with the addition of implanted electrodes and a stimulator that transforms the muscle into an automatic contracting sphincter. ABS comprises an inflatable cuff around the anus that is filled from a pressure-regulating balloon. The cuff can be emptied with an implanted pump.

CONCLUSIONS

DGP and ABS give good results in 56%-88% of cases. For patients with an anatomical intact but nonfunctioning sphincter there is a new treatment: sacral nerve stimulation. This gives continence in a high percentage of cases, but experience is rather limited. Second-line treatment for faecal incontinence is successful and should be considered in cases where initial therapies fail.