Increased serum neopterin concentration as indicator of disease severity and poor survival in multiple myeloma

Neopterin as a biomarker of immune response in cancer patients

With the advent of immunotherapy the topic of biomarkers of immune response is of high interest. Along with the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), biomarkers of macrophage activation could be of interest. Neopterin is a biomarker of immune activation increased in different disorders associated with immune activation, including cancer. Neopterin synthesis is induced by interferon-γ that also induces indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), an enzyme catalyzing catabolism of tryptophan to kynurenine. Increased urinary or serum concentrations of neopterin have been associated with poor prognosis across a spectrum of malignant disorders of different primary location. Neopterin concentration in peripheral blood as well as in the tumor microenvironment correlates with phenotypic and functional changes of lymphocytes, indicating immune dysfunction. Increased neopterin concentrations are also accompanied by increased rate of conversion of tryptophan to kynurenine. Increasing neopterin concentrations also accompany side effects of anticancer treatment and could predict subsequent complications. Although almost four decades have elapsed since the discovery of increased neopterin concentrations in cancer patients, the full potential of neopterin as a biomarker in this setting has not been so far realized.

Clinical laboratory differentiation of infectious versus non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neopterin, and endotoxin in the differential diagnosis of sepsis and non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

METHODS

A Medline database and references from identified articles were used to perform a literature search relating to the differential diagnosis of sepsis versus non-infectious SIRS.

RESULTS

CRP, PCT, and neopterin are released both in sepsis and in non-infectious inflammatory disease. CRP and PCT are equally effective, although not perfect, in differentiating between sepsis and non-infectious SIRS. However, CRP and PCT have different kinetics and profiles. The kinetics of CRP is slower than that of PCT, and CRP levels may not further increase during more severe stages of sepsis. On the contrary, PCT rises in proportion to the severity of sepsis and reaches its highest levels in septic shock. PCT tends to be higher in nonsurvivor than in survivor. Therefore, PCT demonstrated a closer correlation with the severity of sepsis and outcome than CRP. Unlike CRP and PCT, neopterin is increased in viral infection as well as bacterial infection, and neopterin is also a useful indicator of sepsis. Endotoxemia was detected in no more than half of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia, and Gram-negative bacteremia was detected in half of patients with endotoxemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic capacity of PCT is superior to that of CRP due to the close correlation between PCT levels and the severity of sepsis and outcome. Neopterin is very useful in the diagnosis of viral infection. The endotoxin assay in combination with CRP, PCT, or neopterin may help as a diagnostic marker for Gram-negative bacterial infection.

Immunophenotypic Aberrations, DNA Content, and Cell Cycle Analysis of Plasma Cells in Patients with Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathies

We describe the immunophenotypic and gross DNA defects in 55 patients with myeloma and 50 patients with monoclonal gammopathy and review the literature on this subject (MedLine, 1994-2000). Our data confirmed previous reports indicating that in myeloma nearly all marrow plasma cells are abnormal (98.7 +/- 8.1%). In monoclonal gammopathy the fraction of abnormal plasma cells was 35.0 +/- 32.8%. In both myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy, the most frequent aberrant phenotypic features consisted of absence of expression of CD19, strong expression of CD56, and decreased intensity of expression of CD38; aberrant expression of CD10, CD20, CD22, or CD28 was observed in less than one-third of myeloma cases. The vast majority of cases had two or more phenotypic aberrations. In the DNA studies, 7% of myeloma cases were biclonal and 93% of cases were monoclonal. In those studies with only one plasma cell mitotic cycle, 37% had normal DNA content and 63% were aneuploid (hyperploid, 61%; hypoploid, 2%). The mean percentages of plasma cells in S- and G2M phases were 4.9 +/- 8.5 and 4.4 +/- 6.9%, respectively. Thirty-eight percent of cases had more than 3% of plasma cells in S phase. In monoclonal gammopathy, the DNA index of abnormal plasma cells ranged from 0.89 to 1.30 and the percentage of diploid (31%) and aneuploid (69%) cases was not different from the results found in myeloma. The differences in percentage of abnormal plasma cells in S- (7.4 +/- 8.6%) and G2M-phases (2.4 +/- 1.7%) in patients with monoclonal gammopathy were not statistically significant.

Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma

There is significant variation in the survival of patients with myeloma. This article reviews the major prognostic factors in myeloma and the evidence supporting their usefulness in clinical practice and research. The factors reviewed include serum beta 2-microglobulin, bone marrow plasma cell labeling index, cytogenetics, plasmablastic morphology, and other standard clinical laboratory variables. Novel factors such as bone marrow angiogenesis are also discussed. A combination of independent factors provides greater prognostic information than any one factor alone, and survival data using various combinations of prognostic factors are presented.

Dihydropteridine reductase activity and neopterin levels in leukemias and lymphomas: is there any correlation between these two parameters?

Urinary neopterin levels, blood dihydropteridine reductase activity as well as other frequently used clinical parameters were evaluated in 110 patients suffering from various types of lymphomas and leukemias. Among them neopterin was detected as the most sensitive marker representing the severity of malignancy (p<0.00001). All patients with active diseases had significantly raised urinary neopterin levels compared to those in remission and healthy controls. Of 69 patients with active disease 66 (96%) were above the upper limit seen in healthy subjects. In addition, the highest neopterin excretion was found in patients with active chronic myeloid leukemia (1469+/-479 micromol/mol creatinine n=16). In contrast, only 1 of 41 patients in stable responsive disease and remission (2.4%) had increased urinary neopterin levels above the upper limit. Dihydropteridine reductase (DHPR) activities were also detected in all patients and control groups. In active disease slightly reduced (DHPR) activities were evident (3.42+/-0.37 for controls, 2.92+/-0.39 in active disease and 3.28+/-0.42 nmol red cytochrome C/min/5 mm diameter disc in remission patients). However in patients under medication this was strengthened. This data also suggest that DHPR activity can be effected by chemotherapy. The results of the present study support the fact that urinary neopterin levels may be an useful and reliable early prognostic marker for neoplasia when used together with other prognostic indicators. Our data also suggest that reductions in DHPR activities may also be an underlying cause for the neurological disorders that are commonly seen in patients with haematological malignancies.

Diagnosis, prognosis, and standard treatment of multiple myeloma

The diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is often difficult; most patients present with asymptomatic gammopathy. The only findings that confirm a diagnosis of MM are an elevation in the M-component or extension of the lytic bone lesions that are the hallmark of the disease. Tests that delineate plasma cell biology, such as plasma cell proliferation rate, are helpful; magnetic resonance imaging can disclose bone marrow lesions leading to subsequent osteolytic disease. After the diagnosis of MM has been established and prognostic factors identified, the appropriate therapy can be determined. Melphalan and prednisone are no longer considered to be the "gold standard" of therapy. In fact, this approach is suitable for less than half of patients with myeloma. This article presents guidelines for standard treatment options and examines the efficacy of new high-dose chemotherapy approaches.

Prognosis in myeloma

OBJECTIVE

To review biologic factors that may be useful in determining prognosis in patients with myeloma.

DESIGN

The currently available clinical variables and staging systems were assessed for their predictive value in myeloma, and newly proposed prognostic factors were summarized.

RESULTS

Because some patients with myeloma may potentially benefit by new, more intensive therapies such as stem cell transplantation or may have prolonged survival with standard therapy, determining factors that would distinguish such patients is important. Independent prognostic factors such as the plasma cell labeling index and beta 2-microglobulin have repeatedly outperformed other prognostic clinical variables and can be combined into a system that identifies poor, intermediate, and good prognostic groups of patients with myeloma. New factors are needed to improve on the predictive value of these two variables. Studies of the biologic features of myelomas have led to the discovery of soluble interleukin 6 receptor (sIL 6R) in the serum. sIL 6R enhances the myeloma cell response to interleukin 6, a central growth factor that affects myeloma cell proliferation. Preliminary studies by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group show that sIL 6R predicts survival independent of the plasma cell labeling index and beta 2-microglobulin. Other proposed independent prognostic factors include cytokines and their soluble receptors, regulatory T cells, circulating myeloma cells, myeloma cell precursors, and markers of proliferation, apoptosis, and drug resistance.

CONCLUSION

Because of wide variation in duration of survival, the prognosis of patients with myeloma, a fatal bone marrow plasma cell neoplasm, cannot yet be adequately predicted. Better prognostic factors are needed for stratification in clinical trials, counseling of patients, and designing of new therapeutic trials.

Multiple myeloma in the elderly

While multiple myeloma is an incurable disease for nearly all patients, current chemotherapy and supportive care can result in significant disease control and improved duration of survival and quality of life. With the average age of patients about 70, most of the high-dose curative strategies exclude the bulk of patients affected by the disease. Recent advances in understanding the biology and pathophysiology of myeloma have led to novel therapies aimed at altering drug resistance, improving duration of the plateau phase, interrupting the cytokine growth stimulation, and improving management of common complications including infections, anemia, and bone lesions. These latter approaches are not restricted to younger patients, and early evidence indicates that elderly patients are also likely to benefit.

Multiple myeloma: 'early' plasma cell phenotype identifies patients with aggressive biological and clinical characteristics

The immunological phenotype of bone marrow myeloma cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes was evaluated in 38 untreated myeloma patients. A striking increase of monotypic cells expressing the same light chain as the M component was observed in bone marrow from 18/38 (47%) patients. A two-colour analysis clarified that the majority of myeloma cells co-expressed plasma cell and B lymphocyte markers (cyIg, CD38, CD56 and sIg), and were regarded as early-plasma cells (early-PC). In the remaining patients, myeloma cells expressed plasma cell markers only (late-PC). Phenotype corresponded to a distinct morphological pattern: early-PC showed a lympho-plasmocytoid feature with significantly lower diameters than late-PC (12.1 v 14.8 microns, P < 0.007). Moreover, the plasma cell labelling index was significantly increased in early-PC patients (1.2 v 0.5%, P < 0.04). In peripheral blood from patients with early-PC, monotypic cells co-expressing sIg and CD38, CD56, but not CD19, were also detected. These data suggest a recirculation of early-PC. Myeloma cells maintained their phenotypic pattern during the course of the disease. This observation suggests that the degree of maturation is an intrinsic characteristic of the myeloma cell population in individual patients. The evaluation of prognostic factors, such as beta 2-microglobulin, C-reactive protein and neopterin, showed a statistically significant increase in the early-PC patients, suggesting a poor outcome. In conclusion, myeloma cell phenotype allows identification of a myeloma variant with aggressive biological and clinical characteristics.

Biology and treatment of multiple myeloma

The uniformly fatal plasma cell malignancy, multiple myeloma (MM), currently represents 10-15% of hematologic neoplasms in the USA and has been steadily increasing in incidence for several decades. Therapeutic alternatives have lagged significantly behind insights into the biology and pathogenesis of this entity. Traditionally felt to be a neoplasm of fully differentiated plasma cells, evidence has been mounting that the self renewing population consist of cells derived from a much earlier compartment; perhaps prior to B-cell lineage commitment or even at the level of an earlier 'stem cell'. Bcl-2 protein overexpression has been almost uniformly seen in both clinical myeloma specimens as well as in myeloma cell lines. The failure to consistently identify the t(14;18) translocation, normally found in follicular lymphomas and characteristically associated with overexpression of bcl-2, implies a unique mechanism in MM. A number of cytokines, including TNF alpha, IL-1 and IL-6 have been found to play a central role not only in the biology of the malignant clone but also in the bony and other systemic manifestations of this disease. Since both IL-6 and bcl-2 protein have been shown to prevent programmed cell death, this may be the unifying event in MM. Standard therapy for MM has been an alkylating agent and corticosteroid. Combination chemotherapy provides more prompt palliation but no clear survival advantage. In advanced stages, adriamycin may offer some survival advantage. High dose chemotherapy with or without stem cell support offers a potentially curative therapeutic approach. New interventions directed at the complex cytokine networks pertinent to the pathogenesis of MM are an exciting new area of investigation. Identification of new prognostic parameters as well as new active agents remains the central theme in clinical myeloma research.