Has the incidence of multiple myeloma in old age been underestimated? The myeloma project of health region I in Norway. I

More frequent IgD and reduced CD200 expression in Chinese patients younger than 50 years old with multiple myeloma: a multicenter analysis

We retrospectively analyzed the presenting features and survival of 194 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma in the People’s Republic of China. Compared with older patients, younger patients had a higher percentage of IgD isotype, lower percentage of International Staging System Stage 3 disease, higher albumin level, and lower frequency of high β2-microglobulin and CD200 expression. There was no difference in sex, Durie–Salmon stage, bone lesion degree, creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and expression of other antigens. Among all 940 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma, those younger than 50 years had better overall survival and progression-free survival than older patients. Of these patients, 457 were treated with a bortezomib-containing regimen, and 450 received conventional therapy. Younger patients treated with bortezomib had better overall survival and progression-free survival than older patients. However, younger patients treated with conventional therapy had the same survival as older patients.

Targeted treatments for multiple myeloma: specific role of carfilzomib

Carfilzomib is a selective, irreversible proteasome inhibitor, initially approved in the US in 2012 as single-agent therapy for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Numerous Phase II studies have evaluated carfilzomib in the relapsed and refractory as well as the newly diagnosed setting, and Phase III studies are entering their final analysis. Data continue to grow to support its use as both single-agent therapy and in combination with immunomodulatory and other novel agents. This review discusses the role of carfilzomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and role in clinical management will be reviewed.

Patterns of multiple myeloma during the past 5 decades: stable incidence rates for all age groups in the population but rapidly changing age distribution in the clinic

OBJECTIVE

To define age-adjusted incidence trends in multiple myeloma (MM) in a well-characterized population during a long period, given that some, but not all, studies have reported increasing MM incidence over time and that clinical experience from some centers suggests an increased incidence mainly in younger age groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified all patients (N=773) with MM diagnosed in Malmö, Sweden, from January 1, 1950, through December 31, 2005. Using census data for the population of Malmö, we calculated age- and sex-specific incidence rates. Incidence rates were also calculated for 10-year birth cohorts. Analyses for trends were performed using the Poisson regression.

RESULTS

From 1950 through 2005, the average annual age-adjusted (European standard population) incidence rate remained stable (Poisson regression, P=.07 for men and P=.67 for women). Also, comparisons between 10-year birth cohorts (from 1870-1879 to 1970-1979) failed to detect any increase. Between 1950-1959 and 2000-2005, the median age at diagnosis of MM increased from 70 to 74 years, and the proportion of newly diagnosed patients aged 80 years or older increased from 16% to 31%.

CONCLUSION

Our finding of stable MM incidence rates for all age groups during the past 5 decades suggests that recent clinical observations of an increase of MM in the young may reflect an increased referral stream of younger patients with MM, which in turn might be a consequence of improved access to better MM therapies. Importantly, because of the aging population, the proportion of patients with MM aged 80 years or older doubled between 1950-1959 and 2000-2005.

Myeloma in patients younger than age 50 years presents with more favorable features and shows better survival: an analysis of 10 549 patients from the International Myeloma Working Group

We analyzed the presenting features and survival in 1689 patients with multiple myeloma aged younger than 50 years compared with 8860 patients 50 years of age and older. Of the total 10 549 patients, 7765 received conventional therapy and 2784 received high-dose therapy. Young patients were more frequently male, had more favorable features such as low International Staging System (ISS) and Durie-Salmon stage as well as less frequently adverse prognostic factors including high C-reactive protein (CRP), low hemoglobin, increased serum creatinine, and poor performance status. Survival was significantly longer in young patients (median, 5.2 years vs 3.7 years; P < .001) both after conventional (median, 4.5 years vs 3.3 years; P < .001) or high-dose therapy (median, 7.5 years vs 5.7 years; P = .04). The 10-year survival rate was 19% after conventional therapy and 43% after high-dose therapy in young patients, and 8% and 29%, respectively, in older patients. Multivariate analysis revealed age as an independent risk factor during conventional therapy, but not after autologous transplantation. A total of 5 of the 10 independent risk factors identified for conventional therapy were also relevant for autologous transplantation. After adjusting for normal mortality, lower ISS stage and other favorable prognostic features seem to account for the significantly longer survival of young patients with multiple myeloma with age remaining a risk factor during conventional therapy.

Autologous transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: are we asking the right questions?

Multiple myeloma is a disease of the elderly. Survival outcomes remain unacceptably low in older adults with multiple myeloma. To date, no obvious difference in tumor biology has been elucidated to explain the survival disparity between older and younger patients. Multiple factors including comorbidity, performance status, decreased physiologic reserve and potentially undertreatment contribute to poor outcomes in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is increasingly being used to treat elderly patients with multiple myeloma in an effort to improve survival outcomes. Recent case comparison studies, and preliminary transplant registry data suggest that selected older patients can be treated with high-dose chemotherapy effectively with similar toxicity and survival benefits compared to younger patients. Traditional upper age limits for autologous transplantation are being challenged along with the definition of 'elderly' itself. Ultimately, the role of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in the upfront treatment of older adults with multiple myeloma can only be established by prospective randomized trials. In the process of designing studies to investigate the use of ASCT in older patients, multiple issues unique to the elderly population will need to be considered. First, it will be critical to develop and validate patient selection algorithms that incorporate measures of comorbidity, cognitive function, physiologic reserve and psychosocial function to identify patients most likely to tolerate and benefit from ASCT. Second, preparative and conditioning regimens will need to be further tailored to maximize the benefit to risk ratio. Finally, outcome measures in clinical trials should include disability and quality of life measures, which may be equally important in making treatment decisions for older patients. The future application and study of autologous transplantation in older patients with multiple myeloma provides a unique opportunity to challenge ageism and serve as a model for development of tailored assessments and interventions in this population.

Impact of age on survival after intensive therapy for multiple myeloma: a population-based study by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group

The value of intensive therapy, including autologous stem cell transplantation, in newly diagnosed myeloma patients >60 years is not clear. We evaluated the impact of age (<60 years vs. 60-64 years) on survival in a prospective, population-based setting and compared survival with conventionally treated historic controls. The prospective population comprised 452 patients registered between 1998 and 2000. Of these, 414 received intensive therapy. The historic population, derived from our most recent population-based study on conventional therapy, comprised 281 patients. Of these, 243 fulfilled our eligibility criteria for intensive therapy. For patients undergoing intensive therapy it was found that two factors, beta-2-microglobulin and age <60 years vs. 60-64 years, had independent prognostic impact on survival. However, compared with the historic controls a survival advantage was found both for patients <60 (median 66 months vs. 43 months, P < 0.001) and 60-64 years (median 50 months vs. 27 months; P = 0.001). We conclude that in a population-based setting higher age adversely influences outcome after intensive therapy. Our results indicate that intensive therapy prolongs survival also at age 60-64 years but with less superiority than in younger patients.

Multiple myeloma in elderly patients: prognostic factors and outcome

OBJECTIVES

Purpose of this study was to compare prognostic factors and outcome of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) aged >70 yr at diagnosis with those of younger patients. We also applied the recently proposed International Staging System (ISS) for MM in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 1,162 newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM patients included in our database, 357 (31%) were >70 yr of age. Clinical and laboratory variables were evaluated in patients >70 yr and in younger patients and were assessed for possible correlation with survival in patients >70 yr of age.

RESULTS

Most clinical and laboratory features were similar in the two groups of patients but older patients presented more frequently with advanced ISS (P = 0.02). Despite similar response rates to primary treatment, younger patients survived longer than patients >70 yr of age (40 vs. 28 months, P = 0.001). There was a longer survival of younger patients than that of older patients diagnosed with ISS stage 1 (median 71 vs. 54 months, P = 0.007) and ISS stage-2 patients (median: 38 vs. 26 months, P = 0.0008) but for patients with ISS stage 3 median survival was similarly poor in the younger and older age group (21 and 20 months, P = 0.283). Other variables associated with impaired prognosis were severe anemia, extensive bone marrow plasmacytosis and elevated serum LDH.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with MM present more often with advanced ISS and have significantly shorter survival than younger patients. The ISS retained its prognostic significance within the group of elderly patients.

Nordic Myeloma Study Group, the first 15 years: scientific collaboration and improvement of patient care

The accomplishments of the Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG) during its first 15 yr are briefly surveyed, together with a discussion of principles guiding the group's clinical trials and of problems that need to be addressed in coming years. The group has so far carried out 12 clinical trials, comprising more than 2500 patients, spanning from minor phase II to large randomised phase III trials. At the time of writing, two randomised trials are running (comparing two doses of i.v. pamidronate, and melphalan-prednisone (MP) vs. MP-thalidomide to elderly patients). The group has strived for a simple organisation with much responsibility delegated to regional coordinators (Denmark 3, Norway 5, Sweden 5). With regard to trial design, the group has considered it important that studies are based on sound scientific questions, are simple to handle for the participants, population based, investigator initiated, include quality of life and health resources assessment as end-points, and can be used as basis for diverse scientific spin-off projects. Like other clinical trial groups, NMSG faces a number of challenges in coming years. The financial situation for independent investigator-initiated trials is far from satisfactory, especially with regard to the resource-consuming implementation of more stringent good clinical practice rules and ethical committee demands. NMSG has also encountered increasing difficulties in recruiting patients to recent trials, partly because of problems related to participating physicians (lack of support, laborious paper work, insufficient credit for participation). Solutions to these problems have to be found if industry-independent clinical trial groups are to survive.

Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: Trend over 6 decades

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated that the incidence and mortality rates for multiple myeloma have increased in the United States. The authors reported on the incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between 1991 and 2001 and on trends in multiple myeloma incidence over the last 56 years.

METHODS

Using the files of the Mayo Clinic and the Olmsted Medical Center (Rochester, MN), the authors identified all residents of Olmsted County who had multiple myeloma, suspected myeloma, or a related disorder. Reports of all laboratory determinations, in addition to autopsy findings and death certificates, were obtained. The criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma have not changed during the last 6 decades.

RESULTS

All but 1 of the 47 residents with multiple myeloma first diagnosed between 1991 and 2001 were recognized antemortem. Fifty-five percent had a previous monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, or solitary plasmacytoma before multiple myeloma was diagnosed. From 1991 to 2001, the overall annual incidence rate, age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. population, was 4.3 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-5.5 per 100,000). Poisson regression analysis showed no statistically significant trend in Olmsted County incidence rates over 56 years. In similar fashion, the authors adjusted multiple myeloma incidence rates from nine other studies worldwide for which adequate data were available and documented similar findings in each case, except for one study that included patients with smoldering multiple myeloma.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota, has not changed in almost 6 decades. The apparent increase in incidence elsewhere is unexplained but probably is attributable to improvements in diagnostic techniques, particularly in older patients.

Monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance: a review

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) denotes the presence of a monoclonal protein (M-protein) in patients without evidence of multiple myeloma (MM), macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis (AL), or a related plasma cell proliferative disorder. MGUS is found in approximately 3% of persons older than 70 years and in about 1% of those older than 50 years. In a series of 1384 patients from south-eastern Minnesota in whom MGUS was diagnosed at Mayo Clinic from 1960 through 1994, the risk of progression was 1% per year. Patients were at risk of progression even after 25 years or more of a stable monoclonal gammopathy. The risk of development of MM was increased by 25-fold, the risk of macroglobulinemia was 46-fold, and the risk of primary AL was 8.4-fold when compared with a similar population (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results). The concentration of the serum M-protein was the major independent predictor of progression. Patients with an immunoglobulin M (IgM) or an IgA monoclonal gammopathy had a higher risk of progression than those with an IgG monoclonal gammopathy. The presence of a urine M-protein or the reduction of one or more uninvolved Igs was not a risk factor for progression. MGUS may be associated with many different disorders, including lymphoproliferative diseases, leukemia, connective tissue disorders, dermatologic diseases, and neurologic disorders.

Multiple myeloma in elderly patients: presenting features and outcome

Few studies have been performed regarding multiple myeloma (MM) in elderly patients. We report a retrospective series of 130 unselected patients with MM aged 75 yr or more at diagnosis. Presenting features were identical to those reported in younger patients, except for a higher rate of infection. Heavy comorbidity was characteristic of unselected geriatric patients. Ninety-four patients received conventional chemotherapy. The response rate was 62%. Treatment toxicity was mild. Median survival was 22 months. Durie-Salmon (DS) clinical stages II and III MM were severe and often led to death, while significantly more patients with DS stage I MM died from unrelated causes (p<0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that age > or = 85 yr, performance status > or = 2, creatinine level > or = 120 micromol/l, beta 2 microglobulin level > 4 mg/l, C-reactive protein level > 6 mg/l, platelet count < 100 x 10(9)/l, presence of infection and lack of response to chemotherapy were adverse prognostic factors for survival. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, age > or = 85 yr (p<0.0001), performance status > or = 2 (p<0.0001) and creatinine level > or = 120 micromol/l (p<0.0001) were independent factors in predicting short survival. This study provides evidence that in patients with symptomatic MM age should not be considered as a major obstacle to active treatment. Prospective clinical trials are needed in this population of patients and should include an assessment of quality of life.

Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma

Most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) present with symptoms, have evidence of generalized disease, and require chemotherapy promptly to reduce the malignant clone. Some patients present with a local symptom from a single plasmacytoma but no myeloma elsewhere. Such patients usually become free of symptoms after local radiotherapy. In patients with MM without symptoms, the diagnosis is made on the basis of screening laboratory tests. In patients with either solitary plasmacytoma of bone or asymptomatic MM, systemic treatment should be deferred until there is evidence of disease progression.

Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma

Most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) present with symptoms, have evidence of generalized disease, and require chemotherapy promptly to reduce the malignant clone. Some patients present with a local symptom from a single plasmacytoma but no myeloma elsewhere. Such patients usually become free of symptoms after local radiotherapy. In patients with MM without symptoms, the diagnosis is made on the basis of screening laboratory tests. In patients with either solitary plasmacytoma of bone or asymptomatic MM, systemic treatment should be deferred until there is evidence of disease progression.

Response rate and survival after conventional chemotherapy for multiple myeloma by hospitals with different inclusion rates of patients to the trials. A Finnish Leukemia Group study

The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of the hospital size, measured as the number of annual patient enrolments in the Finnish Leukaemia Group trials in the period 1979-85, on response rate and survival after conventional chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. The 432 myeloma patients for this study were derived from 4 prospective multicentre trials of the Finnish Leukaemia Group. The comparisons of the response rate to primary chemotherapy, progression-free survival time (PFS), response rate after first relapse and overall survival time (OS) were made between patients treated in 3 hospital categories according to annual enrolment rate. 273 of the patients had been treated in "large" hospitals, 120 in "intermediate" and 38 in "small" ones. The median OS of patients aged up to 70 yr was 49 months and that of patients older than 70 yr was 31 months. There were no significant differences in response rate, PFS, response rate after first relapse and OS between the hospital categories. The most important endpoints in the treatment of multiple myeloma, response rate, PFS and OS are independent of the size of the hospital, measured as the number of annual patient entries in the trial. This allows the decentralisation of the conventional chemotherapy of multiple myeloma, within the framework of properly organised clinical trials.

Therapeutic options in the treatment of multiple myeloma: pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations

A review of current treatment options in multiple myeloma is presented, including data on health-related quality of life and pharmacoeconomics. For induction chemotherapy, no combination of cytostatic drugs has been shown to be consistently superior to the simple cyclic oral treatment with melphalan and prednisone that has been available for 30 years. The total resource consumption and direct costs per patient treated with melphalan and prednisone is approximately $US10,000 (1995 values). As median survival is prolonged from less than a year in untreated patients to 30 to 36 months, this treatment must be considered cost effective. Interferon-alpha has a modest effect on progression-free and overall survival when added to chemotherapy regimens. However, the high cost and toxicity of this drug results in an unfavourable cost-utility ratio, estimated to be between $US50,000 to $US100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Clinical trials suggest that high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell support administered to patients who have achieved disease stabilisation or objective response to conventional induction chemotherapy, prolongs median survival by about 1.5 years. Preliminary cost-utility analyses suggest a cost per life-year gained of $US30,000 to $US40,000. Further potential improvements of this therapeutic modality are under way. Several bisphosphonates have been tested for the ability to prevent the skeletal complications of multiple myeloma. Monthly infusions of pamidronate have been shown in 1 randomised trial to significantly reduce the rate of skeletal complications. Unfortunately, the rapid and widespread acceptance of this therapy seems to preclude further prospective, placebo-controlled trials with cost-utility evaluation.

Survival in conventionally treated younger (<60 years) multiple myeloma patients: no improvement during two decades. Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG)

The patient registers of five prospective population based Nordic studies were reviewed for patients <60 yr. A total of 313 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma were identified. Thirty-nine of them were judged retrospectively to have been ineligible for intensive chemotherapy regimens. The remaining 274 patients were considered appropriate as a historical control group for comparison with patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support. Of these, 32 had been diagnosed during the period 1970-83, 101 during the period 1984-89 and 141 during the period 1990-92. The median age was 54 yr. Six percent were Durie/Salmon stage I, 38% stage II and 56% stage III. Melphalan-prednisone was used for initial therapy in 87%. Median survival for all patients with symptomatic myeloma was found to be 41 months, and for those selected for the control group 44 months, with no noted differences between the aforementioned diagnostic periods. We conclude that the expected median survival is 44 months for myeloma patients <60 yr who may be considered for high-dose therapy protocols. New developments in chemotherapy and supportive therapy, achieved during the two decades which preceded the use of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue, have not changed the overall prognosis in multiple myeloma.

Epidemiology of the M-component immunoglobulin types of multiple myeloma

The purpose of this population-based case-control study was to learn whether risk factors differ for the individual immunoglobulin types of multiple myeloma. In particular, we sought to determine whether IgA and IgG myeloma were related to a history of exposure to reported IgA- and IgG-stimulating conditions, respectively, or to a history of selected occupational and physicochemical exposures. The M-component immunoglobulin type was determined from immunoelectrophoresis as reported in medical records, and exposure status was obtained through in-person interviews. IgG (56 percent) and IgA (22 percent) M-components predominated. For 17 percent of cases, no peak was found on immunoelectrophoresis; they were presumed to have light-chain myeloma. Persons with these three types of myeloma did not differ with respect to distributions of age or race, but a somewhat higher proportion of light-chain cases were women (58 percent cf 45 percent of all other cases). Detailed analysis of the IgA and IgG subtypes provided little evidence that they differ with respect to prior immune stimulation or employment in several specific jobs. IgA myeloma, but not IgG myeloma, was associated modestly with a history of exposure to chest and dental X-rays. Our study provides little evidence that IgA and IgG myeloma differ with respect to the risk factors examined.

Initial versus deferred melphalan-prednisone therapy for asymptomatic multiple myeloma stage I--a randomized study. Myeloma Group of Western Sweden

From October 1983 until December 1988, 50 patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma stage I were included in a prospective randomized multi-centre study comparing melphalan-prednisone (MP) therapy started at the time of diagnosis with deferred therapy where MP was started at the time of disease progression. Twenty-five patients were randomized to each group. The median time from diagnosis to start of therapy in the group with deferred therapy was 12 months. The reasons for starting therapy were increasing M-protein in 8 cases, symptomatic bone disease in 9 and anaemia in 5. In 2 cases, disease progression was complicated by vertebral fractures necessitating radiotherapy. Two patients in the group in which MP was started at the time of diagnosis developed acute leukaemia. No differences in response rate, response duration or survival were observed between the treatment groups. We conclude that in asymptomatic myeloma deferral of chemotherapy is feasible in well-informed and well-controlled patients but conveys no advantage in survival. In clinical practice the benefits of treatment deferral are to some extent outweighed by disease progression before start of treatment.