Assessment of systemic inflammation markers to differentiate a stable from a deteriorating clinical course in patients with febrile neutropenia

Evaluating IL-6 and IL-10 as rapid diagnostic tools for Gram-negative bacteria and as disease severity predictors in pediatric sepsis patients in the intensive care unit

Background

To explore the diagnostic performance of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 in discriminating Gram bacteria types and predicting disease severity in intensive care unit (ICU)-hospitalized pediatric sepsis patients.

Method

We retrospectively collected Th1/Th2 cytokine profiles of 146 microbiologically documented sepsis patients. Patients were categorized into Gram-positive (G+) or Gram-negative (G-) sepsis groups, and cytokine levels were compared. Subgroup analysis was designed to eliminate the influence of other inflammatory responses on cytokine levels.

Results

After propensity score matching, 78 patients were matched and categorized according to Gram bacteria types. Compared with G+ sepsis, IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly elevated in G- sepsis (p < 0.05). Spearman test proved the linear correlation between IL-6 and IL-10 (r = 0.654, p < 0.001), and their combination indicators (ratio and differences) were effective in identifying G- sepsis. In the subgroup analysis, such cytokine elevation was significant regardless of primary infection site. However, for patients with progressively deteriorating organ function [new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (NPMODS)], differences in IL-6 and IL-10 levels were less significant between G+ and G- sepsis. In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the G- sepsis group, the area under the curve (AUC) value for IL-6 and IL-10 was 0.679 (95% CI 0.561-0.798) and 0.637 (95% CI 0.512-0.762), respectively. The optimal cutoff value for diagnosing G- sepsis was 76.77 pg/ml and 18.90 pg/ml, respectively. While for the NPMODS group, the AUC for IL-6 and IL-10 was 0.834 (95% CI 0.766-0.902) and 0.781 (95% CI 0.701-0.860), respectively.

Conclusion

IL-6 and IL-10 are comparably effective in discriminating G+/G- sepsis in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. The deteriorated organ function observed in ICU patients reveals that complex inflammatory responses might have contributed to the cytokine pattern observed in severe sepsis patients, therefore confounding the discriminating efficacy of Th1/Th2 cytokines in predicting Gram bacteria types.

Triple quantitative detection of three inflammatory biomarkers with a biotin-streptavidin-phycoerythrin based lateral flow immunoassay

Quantified inflammatory biomarkers are effective clinical strategy for correct and reasonable drug treatment. In the study, a triple lateral flow immunoassay (triple LFIA) had firstly been developed for specific and simultaneous detection of three pivotal inflammatory biomarkers (PCT, CRP and SAA) via biotin-streptavidin-phycoerythrin signal amplification system in one strip. The developed triple LFIA adopted phycoerythrin (PE) as chromophore to eliminate auto-fluorescence interference from plasma biomolecules and anti-PE mAb as single control line to reduce the nonspecific adsorption, which featured particular advantages in high sensitivity and specificity in a large range of analyte concentrations with the LODs of 0.106 ng/mL for PCT, 0.345 μg/mL for CRP and 3.112 μg/mL SAA, respectively. And the linear quantitative detection ranges were from 0.106 to 100 ng/mL, from 0.345 to 200 μg/mL, and from 3.112 to 200 μg/mL, respectively. Compared to commercial chemiluminescence immunoassay method, the correlations for tested PCT, CRP and SAA in 108 clinical samples were 0.989, 0.987 and 0.988, respectively. In summary, we had proposed a rapid and accurate plasma detection to measure inflammation factors, which facilitated the clinical value to achieve precise treatment.

A Dynamic Approach for Early Risk Prediction of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Febrile Pediatric Hemato-Oncology Patients

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT), and Interleukine 6 (IL6) biomarkers in predicting the existence of high-risk episodes (HRE) during the first 24 h of fever in pediatric cancer patients. HRE were defined as the presence of Gram-negative bloodstream infections or Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. Methods: The study included 103 consecutive fever episodes in 44 hemato-oncological pediatric patients, from whom samples for biomarkers were taken upon initial evaluation (CRP-1, PCT-1 and IL6-1) and then between 12 and 24 h afterward (CRP-2, PCT-2 and IL6-2). Results: An IL6-1 value higher than 164 pg/mL showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.890 (0.791−0.989) and OR of 48.68 (7.92−951.42, p < 0.001) to detect HRE in multivariate analysis. A PCT-1 higher than 0.32 ng/mL showed an AUC of 0.805 (0.700−0.910) and OR of 4.55 (0.90−27.84, p = 0.076). A PCT-2 higher than 0.94 ng/mL showed an AUC of 0.836 (0.725−0.947) and OR of 13.01 (1.82−149.13, p = 0.018), and an increase in CRP between the first and second sample (CRP-2vs1) higher than 291% also showed an AUC of 0.785 (0.655−0.915) and OR of 31.09 (4.87−355.33, p = 0.001). Conclusions: IL6-1, PCT-2, and CRP-2vs1 showed a strong and independent correlation with HREs in pediatric cancer patients. CRP variations over the first 24 h provide an improvement in predictive models that are especially useful if IL-6 and PCT are not available.

Optimizing Symptoms and Management of Febrile Neutropenia among Cancer Patients: Current Status and Future Directions

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common and serious complication among cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy. FN should be treated as a medical emergency because it can lead to life-threatening complications if appropriate treatment is not initiated immediately. This study provides a critical review on the current management of FN and identifies possible directions to optimize FN management.

Diagnosis and empirical treatment of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in adult neutropenic patients: guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

Fever may be the only clinical symptom at the onset of infection in neutropenic cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy. A prompt and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approach is mandatory. A systematic search of current literature was conducted, including only full papers and excluding allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Recommendations for diagnosis and therapy were developed by an expert panel and approved after plenary discussion by the AGIHO. Randomized clinical trials were mainly available for therapeutic decisions, and new diagnostic procedures have been introduced into clinical practice in the past decade. Stratification into a high-risk versus low-risk patient population is recommended. In high-risk patients, initial empirical antimicrobial therapy should be active against pathogens most commonly involved in microbiologically documented and most threatening infections, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but excluding coagulase-negative staphylococci. In patients whose expected duration of neutropenia is more than 7 days and who do not respond to first-line antibacterial treatment, specifically in the absence of mold-active antifungal prophylaxis, further therapy should be directed also against fungi, in particular Aspergillus species. With regard to antimicrobial stewardship, treatment duration after defervescence in persistently neutropenic patients must be critically reconsidered and the choice of anti-infective agents adjusted to local epidemiology. This guideline updates recommendations for diagnosis and empirical therapy of fever of unknown origin in adult neutropenic cancer patients in light of the challenges of antimicrobial stewardship.

Acute effects of alemtuzumab infusion in patients with active relapsing-remitting MS

Objective:

Alemtuzumab exerts its clinical efficacy by its specific pattern of depletion and repopulation of different immune cells. Beyond long-term immunologic and clinical data, little is known about acute changes in immunologic and routine laboratory parameters and their clinical relevance during the initial alemtuzumab infusion.

Methods:

Fifteen patients with highly active MS were recruited. In addition to parameters including heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, and monitoring of adverse events, complete blood cell count, liver enzymes, kidney function, acute-phase proteins, serum cytokine profile, complement activation, peripheral immune cell distribution, and their potential of cytokine release were investigated prior to and after methylprednisolone and after alemtuzumab on each day of alemtuzumab infusion.

Results:

After the first alemtuzumab infusion, both the total leukocyte and granulocyte counts markedly increased, whereas lymphocyte counts dramatically decreased. In addition to lymphocyte depletion, cell subtypes important for innate immunity also decreased within the first week after alemtuzumab infusion. Although patients reported feeling well, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin peaked at serum levels consistent with septic conditions. Increases in liver enzymes were detected, although kidney function remained stable. Proinflammatory serum cytokine levels clearly rose after the first alemtuzumab infusion. Alemtuzumab led to impaired cytokine release ex vivo in nondepleted cells. Normal clinical parameters and mild adverse events were presented.

Conclusions:

Dramatic immunologic effects were observed. Standardized infusion procedure and pretreatment management attenuated infusion-related reactions. Alemtuzumab-mediated effects led to artificially altered parameters in standard blood testing. We recommend clinical decision-making based on primarily clinical symptoms within the first alemtuzumab treatment week.

Selected inflammatory markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of infections in children treated for hematological malignancies

Infections in children treated for hematological malignancies pose a direct threat to life and are one of the most common causes of treatment failure in this group of patients. Unequivocal diagnosis at the early stages of infection together with an appropriate and timely treatment may be often difficult due to poor manifestation and nonspecific clinical symptoms of the infection progress. Inflammatory markers make a useful diagnostic tool for this purpose. They significantly help to diagnose, monitor, stratify and predict the outcome in severe infections. This article describes selected biomarkers, both those commonly used in clinical practice, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin as well as less common like IL-6, IL-8 and moreover one promising novel marker – pentraxin 3. The authors emphasize their diagnostic value, clinical usefulness and significance in the treatment efficacy monitoring.

Procalcitonin for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia in critically ill patients during 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic: a prospective cohort study, systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Introduction

Procalcitonin (PCT) is helpful for diagnosing bacterial infections. The diagnostic utility of PCT has not been examined thoroughly in critically ill patients with suspected H1N1 influenza.

Methods

Clinical characteristics and PCT were prospectively assessed in 46 patients with pneumonia admitted to medical ICUs during the 2009 and 2010 influenza seasons. An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed by combining our data with data from five other studies on the diagnostic utility of PCT in ICU patients with suspected 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus infection identified by performing a systematic literature search.

Results

PCT levels, measured within 24 hours of ICU admission, were significantly elevated in patients with bacterial pneumonia (isolated or coinfection with H1N1; n = 77) (median = 6.2 μg/L, interquartile range (IQR) = 0.9 to 20) than in patients with isolated H1N1 influenza pneumonia (n = 84; median = 0.56 μg/L, IQR = 0.18 to 3.33). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve of PCT was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64 to 0.80; P < 0.0001) for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia, but increased to 0.76 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.85; P < 0.0001) when patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia and immune-compromising disorders were excluded. PCT at a cut-off of 0.5 μg/L had a sensitivity (95% CI) and a negative predictive value of 80.5% (69.9 to 88.7) and 73.2% (59.7 to 84.2) for diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia, respectively, which increased to 85.5% (73.3 to 93.5) and 82.2% (68.0 to 92.0) in patients without hospital acquired pneumonia or immune-compromising disorder.

Conclusions

In critically ill patients with pneumonia during the influenza season, PCT is a reasonably accurate marker for detection of bacterial pneumonia, particularly in patients with community-acquired disease and without immune-compromising disorders, but it might not be sufficient as a stand-alone marker for withholding antibiotic treatment.

Changes in circulating procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein in predicting evolution of infectious disease in febrile, critically ill patients

Objective

Although absolute values for C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are well known to predict sepsis in the critically ill, it remains unclear how changes in CRP and PCT compare in predicting evolution of: infectious disease, invasiveness and severity (e.g. development of septic shock, organ failure and non-survival) in response to treatment. The current study attempts to clarify these aspects.

Methods

In 72 critically ill patients with new onset fever, CRP and PCT were measured on Day 0, 1, 2 and 7 after inclusion, and clinical courses were documented over a week with follow up to Day 28. Infection was microbiologically defined, while septic shock was defined as infection plus shock. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was assessed.

Results

From peak at Day 0–2 to Day 7, CRP decreased when (bloodstream) infection and septic shock (Day 0–2) resolved and increased when complications such as a new (bloodstream) infection or septic shock (Day 3–7) supervened. PCT decreased when septic shock resolved and increased when a new bloodstream infection or septic shock supervened. Increased or unchanged SOFA scores were best predicted by PCT increases and Day 7 PCT, in turn, was predictive for 28-day outcome.

Conclusion

The data, obtained during ICU-acquired fever and infections, suggest that CRP may be favoured over PCT courses in judging response to antibiotic treatment. PCT, however, may better indicate the risk of complications, such as bloodstream infection, septic shock, organ failure and mortality, and therefore might help deciding on safe discontinuation of antibiotics. The analysis may thus help interpreting current literature and design future studies on guiding antibiotic therapy in the ICU.

Use of inflammatory molecules to predict the occurrence of fever in onco-hematological patients with neutropenia

Febrile neutropenia remains a frequent complication in onco-hematological patients, and changes in the circulating level of inflammatory molecules (IM) may precede the occurrence of fever. The present observational prospective study was carried out to evaluate the behavior of plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), soluble TNF-α I and II receptors (sTNFRI and sTNFRII), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1 or chemokine (c-c motif) ligand 2 (CCL2)], macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α or CCL3), eotaxin (CCL11), interleukin-8 (IL-8 or CXCL8), and interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10 or CXCL10) in 32 episodes of neutropenia in 26 onco-hematological patients. IM were tested on enrollment and 24-48 h before the onset of fever and within 24 h of the first occurrence of fever. Eight of 32 episodes of neutropenia did not present fever (control group) and the patients underwent IM tests on three different occasions. sTNFRI levels, measured a median of 11 h (1-15) before the onset of fever, were significantly higher in patients presenting fever during follow-up compared to controls (P = 0.02). Similar results were observed for sTNFRI and CCL2 levels (P = 0.04 for both) in non-transplanted patients. A cut-off of 1514 pg/mL for sTNFRI was able to discriminate between neutropenic patients with or without fever during follow-up, with 65% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 93% positive predictive value. Measurement of the levels of plasma sTNFRI can be used to predict the occurrence of fever in neutropenic patients.

Biomarkers for risk stratification of febrile neutropenia among children with malignancy: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy remain at increased risk for developing febrile neutropenia (FN). For this heterogeneous population, a biomarker based risk stratification of FN patients may be a useful clinical tool. We hypothesized that serum biomarkers during initial presentation of an FN event could be predictive of subsequent clinical outcome.

PROCEDURE

Eighty-nine FN events from 36 non-consecutive subjects were analyzed. "High-risk" FN criteria included prolonged hospitalization (≥ 7 days), admission to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) or a microbiology confirmed bacteremia. Patients with "low risk" FN had none of the above. Biomarkers measured during the first 2 days of FN hospitalization were analyzed and correlated with respective clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 89 FN events, 44 (49%) fulfilled pre-defined high-risk criteria and 45 (51%) were low-risk. Procalcitonin level (>0.11 ng/ml) was found to be associated with the high-risk FN outcome with sensitivity of 97%. With an increase in log scale by 1, the odds of being high-risk FN increased twofold. Hs-CRP >100 mg/L had sensitivity of 88% in predicting high-risk FN. The odds of a high-risk FN event increased by approximately 1.8-fold with an increase in the log scale of hs-CRP by 1 (10-fold). In univariate analysis, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 were statistically significant and associated with high-risk FN. However, no statistically significant difference was found for IL-1α, sIL-2Ra, IL-3, or TNF-α.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarkers with appropriate critical threshold values may be a useful clinical tool for appropriate risk stratification of children with FN.

Evaluation of circulating soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) to predict risk profile, response to antimicrobial therapy, and development of complications in patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia: a pilot study

The soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (sTREM-1) is a useful marker of infection in patients with sepsis, but has not been adequately evaluated in patients with chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia (FN). The value of sTREM-1 in this setting has been tested in a retrospective, pilot study using stored serum from 48 cancer patients with documented FN. On presentation, patients were categorized according to the Talcott risk-index clinical score. Circulating soluble sTREM-1 was measured using an ELISA procedure, while procalcitonin (PCT) or interleukins 6 (IL-6) and 8 (IL-8), included for comparison, were measured using an immunoluminescence-based assay and Bio-Plex® suspension bead array system, respectively. Circulating concentrations of both sTREM-1 and PCT were significantly (P < 0.05) elevated in patients at high risk for complications or death, as predicted by the Talcott score and were significantly lower in patients who responded to empiric antimicrobial agents. Neither IL-6 nor IL-8 accurately predicted serious complications in patients with FN. These observations, albeit from a pilot study, demonstrate that sTREM-1 is indeed elevated in high-risk patients with FN and is potentially useful to predict their clinical course, either together with, or as an alternative to PCT.

Th1/Th2 cytokine profiles in G+/G- bacteremia in pediatric hematology/oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of infection and appropriate choice of antibiotics are essential not only to improve the prognosis of the patients but also to prevent from the abuse of the antibiotics in hematology/oncology children at the time of neutropenia after intensive chemotherapy.

PROCEDURE

We evaluated the quantification of Th1/Th2 cytokines with flow cytometry bead assay (CBA) in 145 hospitalized febrile hematology/oncology children with positive blood culture to seek for a rapid diagnostic method to determine the type of infection.

RESULTS

IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels from both G- and G+ bacteremia groups were significantly higher than those of controls (P < 0.001). The median levels of IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α of Group G- were 525.4, 96.0, and 6.9 pg/ml, respectively, significantly higher than those of Group G+ (150.0, 22.6, and 4.5 pg/ml, respectively, P < 0.001). According to the different degrees of increased IL-6 and IL-10 levels, we named the G- bacterial infection related cytokine profile G- BIRCP and the G+ BIRCP. The specificity and sensitivity of BIRCP prediction for G- and G+ bacteria cultures were 60.2% and 75.4%, 66.8% and 70.1%, respectively. Similar therapeutic efficacy was achieved between BIRCP-based and broad-spectrum antibiotics groups (86.1% vs. 89.3%, P > 0.05), which was significantly increased as compared with that (65.5%, P < 0.05) of empirical group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed the promising use of the IL-6/IL-10/TNF-α determination with CBA technology for the early and rapid diagnosis, evaluation of G+/G- bacteremia in pediatric hematology/oncology patients.

The mild inflammatory response in febrile neutropenic lymphoma patients with low risk of complications is more pronounced in patients receiving tobramycin once daily compared with three times daily

We evaluated inflammatory markers in febrile neutropenic lymphoma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support. Based on MASCC scores, our patients had a low risk of serious complications and a perspective of a benign initial clinical course of the febrile neutropenia. We also studied the impact of tobramycin given once versus three times daily on these immune markers. Sixty-one patients participating in a Norwegian multicentre prospective randomized clinical trial, comparing tobramycin once daily versus three times daily, given with penicillin G to febrile neutropenic patients, constituted a clinically homogenous group. Four patients had bacteraemia, all isolates being Gram-positive. Thirty-two patients received tobramycin once daily, and 29 patients received tobramycin three times daily. Blood samples were taken at the onset of febrile neutropenia and 1-2 days later. All samples were frozen at -70 °C and analysed at the end of the clinical trial for C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), complement activation products, mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and 17 cytokines. We found a mild proinflammatory response in this series of patients. CRP was non-specifically elevated. Ten patients with decreased MBL levels showed the same mild clinical and proinflammatory response. Patients receiving tobramycin once daily showed a more pronounced proinflammatory response compared with patients receiving tobramycin three times daily. Overall, febrile neutropenic cancer patients with a benign clinical course show a mild proinflammatory immune response.

Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america

This document updates and expands the initial Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Fever and Neutropenia Guideline that was published in 1997 and first updated in 2002. It is intended as a guide for the use of antimicrobial agents in managing patients with cancer who experience chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia. Recent advances in antimicrobial drug development and technology, clinical trial results, and extensive clinical experience have informed the approaches and recommendations herein. Because the previous iteration of this guideline in 2002, we have a developed a clearer definition of which populations of patients with cancer may benefit most from antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis. Furthermore, categorizing neutropenic patients as being at high risk or low risk for infection according to presenting signs and symptoms, underlying cancer, type of therapy, and medical comorbidities has become essential to the treatment algorithm. Risk stratification is a recommended starting point for managing patients with fever and neutropenia. In addition, earlier detection of invasive fungal infections has led to debate regarding optimal use of empirical or preemptive antifungal therapy, although algorithms are still evolving. What has not changed is the indication for immediate empirical antibiotic therapy. It remains true that all patients who present with fever and neutropenia should be treated swiftly and broadly with antibiotics to treat both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. Finally, we note that all Panel members are from institutions in the United States or Canada; thus, these guidelines were developed in the context of North American practices. Some recommendations may not be as applicable outside of North America, in areas where differences in available antibiotics, in the predominant pathogens, and/or in health care-associated economic conditions exist. Regardless of venue, clinical vigilance and immediate treatment are the universal keys to managing neutropenic patients with fever and/or infection.

Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

This document updates and expands the initial Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Fever and Neutropenia Guideline that was published in 1997 and first updated in 2002. It is intended as a guide for the use of antimicrobial agents in managing patients with cancer who experience chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia.

Recent advances in antimicrobial drug development and technology, clinical trial results, and extensive clinical experience have informed the approaches and recommendations herein. Because the previous iteration of this guideline in 2002, we have a developed a clearer definition of which populations of patients with cancer may benefit most from antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis. Furthermore, categorizing neutropenic patients as being at high risk or low risk for infection according to presenting signs and symptoms, underlying cancer, type of therapy, and medical comorbidities has become essential to the treatment algorithm. Risk stratification is a recommended starting point for managing patients with fever and neutropenia. In addition, earlier detection of invasive fungal infections has led to debate regarding optimal use of empirical or preemptive antifungal therapy, although algorithms are still evolving.

What has not changed is the indication for immediate empirical antibiotic therapy. It remains true that all patients who present with fever and neutropenia should be treated swiftly and broadly with antibiotics to treat both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens.

Finally, we note that all Panel members are from institutions in the United States or Canada; thus, these guidelines were developed in the context of North American practices. Some recommendations may not be as applicable outside of North America, in areas where differences in available antibiotics, in the predominant pathogens, and/or in health care–associated economic conditions exist. Regardless of venue, clinical vigilance and immediate treatment are the universal keys to managing neutropenic patients with fever and/or infection.

Plasma levels of procalcitonin and eight additional inflammatory molecules in febrile neutropenic patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association between different inflammatory markers and specific clinical endpoints in patients with febrile neutropenia.

METHOD

We prospectively evaluated the expression of procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin 8 (IL-8), induced protein-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), two soluble TNF-α receptors (sTNF-R I and sTNF-R II), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha, and eotaxin in 37 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurring in 31 hospitalized adult onco-hematologic patients. Peripheral blood samples were collected in the morning at inclusion (day of fever onset) and on days 1, 3, and 7 after the onset of fever. Approximately 2-3 ml of plasma was obtained from each blood sample and stored at -80 °C.

RESULTS

The sTNF-R II level at inclusion (day 1), the PCT level on the day of fever onset, and the change (day 3 - day 1) in the IL-8 and eotaxin levels were significantly higher in patients who died during the 28-day follow-up. A requirement for early adjustment of antimicrobial treatment was associated with higher day 3 levels of IL-8, sTNF-R II, PCT, and MCP-1.

CONCLUSION

Procalcitonin, sTNF-R II, IL-8, MCP-1, and eotaxin could potentially be used to assess the risk of death and the requirement for early adjustment of antimicrobial treatment in febrile, neutropenic onco-hematologic patients. The levels of the other markers showed no association with any of the evaluated endpoints.

Serum amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in hematological patients with neutropenic fever: a prospective comparison with C-reactive protein

Serum amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is considered as a prognostic marker in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, but no data are available on NT-proBNP kinetics in hematological patients with neutropenic fever. Altogether 70 hematological patients with neutropenic fever were included in this prospective study. NT-proBNP and C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined at the beginning of the neutropenic fever (d0) and then daily up to 3-4 days. The median NT-proBNP (interquartile range) increased from 127 (57-393) ng/L on d0 to 542 (194-1385) ng/L on d4. The increment of CRP was from 35 (17-61) mg/L on d0 to 109 (56-109) mg/L on d2. Neither serial NT-proBNP nor CRP predicted development of severe sepsis, but NT-proBNP was significantly higher in patients with previous cardiovascular disease than in those without. NT-proBNP seemed to reflect cardiac distress, but it did not help to predict the development of severe sepsis in this patient group.

Predicting the complicated neutropenic fever in the emergency department

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to identify independent factors that can be used to predict whether febrile neutropenic patients who appear healthy at presentation will develop subsequent complications, using variables that are readily available in the emergency department (ED).

Method:

The medical records of 192 episodes in which the patients presented to the ED with neutropenic fever resulting from chemotherapy, with an alert mental state and haemodynamic stability were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints examined were fever response to administered antibiotics, death or severe medical complications during hospitalisation.

Results:

Thirty-eight episodes of neutropenic fever with complicated outcomes were identified from among a total of 192 episodes. Three parameters emerged as independent factors for the prediction of neutropenic fever with complications in the multivariate regression analysis: platelet count (130−450 × 10³ cells/mm³) <50 000 cells/mm³, serum C-reactive protein (CRP, 0.1–1 mg/dl) >10 mg/dl and pulmonary infiltration on chest x ray.

Conclusions:

Platelet count, CRP and pulmonary infiltration on chest x ray at presentation could be used to identify febrile neutropenic patients who will develop complications, and these factors may be useful in making treatment-related decisions in the ED.

Serum amyloid A: an acute-phase protein involved in tumour pathogenesis

The synthesis of acute-phase protein serum amyloid A (SAA) is largely regulated by inflammation- associated cytokines and a high concentration of circulating SAA may represent an ideal marker for acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. However, SAA is also synthesized in extrahepatic tissues, e.g. human carcinoma metastases and cancer cell lines. An increasing body of in vitro data supports the concept of involvement of SAA in carcinogenesis and neoplastic diseases. Accumulating evidence suggests that SAA might be included in a group of biomarkers to detect a pattern of physiological events that reflect the growth of malignancy and host response. This review is meant to provide a broad overview of the many ways that SAA could contribute to tumour development, and accelerate tumour progression and metastasis, and to gain a better understanding of this acute-phase reactant as a possible link between chronic inflammation and neoplasia.

Febrile neutropenia

This review summarizes the current status and diagnostic-therapeutic challenges in febrile neutropenia. Patients with neutropenia-associated infections have a poor prognosis. A large meta-analysis of trials assessing prophylactic antibiotics has shown significant survival benefits; clinical significance of resistance is unclear. Administering broad-spectrum antibiotics to established febrile neutropenic patients has become selective, vancomycin is withheld unless absolutely necessary, and low-risk patients are identified with biological markers. Such patients are now managed with oral antibiotics at home or even without antibiotics. Protracted prolonged neutropenia is the setting par excellence for invasive fungal infections. Conventional amphotericin B administered to such risk patients reduces the incidence of fungal infections. New antifungal drugs have heightened efficacy and lowered toxicity. Novel antifungal diagnostic tests include imaging, particularly the CT "halo" sign (aspergillosis), and serology (glucan, galactomannan), and provide earlier diagnosis and treatment and better outcomes. Negative tests may indicate withholding antifungal therapy. High intermittent dosing of liposomal amphotericin B seems as safe and as effective as standard dosing regimens, but at half the drug acquisition cost. The use of nonantibiotic agents has offered alternative management strategies. Recombinant interleukin-11 reduces bacteremia, through a cytoprotective mechanism on the gut. rhIL-11 releases C-reactive protein and causes shedding of soluble TNF receptor-1, modulating the immunological milieu and the systemic inflammatory response. Other candidate molecules include RANTES and long-pentraxin 3. Recombinant growth factors reduce febrile episodes, permitting completion of chemotherapy, increase overall survival, and minimize infection mortality.

Cytokine concentrations are not predictive of bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients

Assay of cytokines and C reactive protein (CRP) in different periods of febrile neutropenia may be helpful for early defining the risk in severe infections. We determined serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta), and CRP in 22 previously untreated patients with various malignancies. Samples were obtained in four different clinical periods of febrile neutropenia; prior to chemotherapy, afebrile neutropenic period after chemotherapy, febrile neutropenic period, and recovery period. When compared to sex-and age-matched group of healthy subjects, IL-6, IL-8, sIL-2R, and CRP levels were found to be elevated in all periods. The highest levels were encountered in the febrile neutropenic period. For predictivity purposes, the afebrile neutropenic period was the most important period. Serum sIL-2R, IL-6, IL-8 and CRP levels were elevated in this period. IL-8 levels showed the most stable elevation through different stages of febrile neutropenia. Serum IL-8 levels were found to have the most reliable and stable elevation in different clinical stages of febrile neutropenia. Nevertheless, IL-8 is not able to discriminate among risk groups and cannot be used as a predictive factor.

The time course of blood C-reactive protein concentrations in relation to the response to initial antimicrobial therapy in patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND

C-reactive protein (CRP) may be a useful marker of sepsis but its use in the evaluation of response to therapy remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to define the time course of CRP levels in septic patients according to their response to initial antimicrobial treatment, and to search for possible correlations between CRP levels and other clinical and biological variables.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, observational, multicenter study included all critically ill patients with sepsis admitted to two medico-surgical departments of intensive care in Brussels, Belgium during a 5-month period. CRP levels and standard clinical and biological variables were measured daily from the day of sepsis diagnosis until death, transfer to the general floor, or the seventh day, which ever came first. Patients were divided into three groups according to their clinical course: group 1--patients with a favorable response to initial antibiotic therapy; group 2--patients who required a change in antibiotic therapy; group 3--patients who needed a procedure to control the infection.

RESULTS

CRP concentrations decreased more rapidly and to a greater degree in group 1 than in group 2 patients (p=0.001). An increase in CRP of at least 2.2 mg/dl in the first 48 h was associated with ineffective initial antibiotic therapy with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 67%. No correlation was found between CRP levels and other clinical and biological variables.

CONCLUSION

Changes in CRP levels over the first 48 h of therapy can help to evaluate the response to initial antimicrobial therapy in septic patients.

Neutropenic fever and severe sepsis in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving intensive chemotherapy: Causes and consequences

The objective of this study was to evaluate etiology and consequences of neutropenic fever in AML patients. Two hundred and ninety neutropenic periods following chemotherapy in 84 AML patients were retrospectively evaluated. Neutropenic fever was found in 280 periods (97%). Severe sepsis developed in 35 occasions (13%) and 9 patients (11%) died due to severe sepsis. In 165 episodes with neutropenic fever (59%), the potential causative organism was found in blood cultures. Gram-negative bacteria were more commonly found in patients who developed severe sepsis (40% vs. 23%, p = 0.03). CRP after 2 - 3 days from start with fever was higher in patients with severe sepsis (190 mg/L vs. 96 mg/L, p < 0.001) but the rise in CRP rather coincided than preceded with the development of severe sepsis. Severe sepsis is associated with significant mortality in AML patients. Earlier methods than CRP are needed to predict development of severe sepsis.

Non-infectious causes of elevated procalcitonin and C-reactive protein serum levels in pediatric patients with hematologic and oncologic disorders

BACKGROUND

Procalcitonin (PCT) is considered a sensitive and specific diagnostic and prognostic marker of systemic bacterial infection, but its value is questionable in certain clinical conditions, particularly in hemato-oncological patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in 56 patients of a pediatric hematology-oncology unit during 110 consecutive non-infectious febrile episodes related to administration of T-cell antibodies (group A; n = 22), alemtuzumab (monoclonal CD52 antibody, CAMPATH-1H/group B; n = 8), interleukin-2 (IL-2/group C; n = 41), prophylactic donor granulocyte transfusions (group D; n = 9), or to acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD/group E; n = 10) and compared the results with 20 episodes of Gram-negative sepsis (group F).

MAIN RESULTS

In the majority of the non-infectious episodes PCT and CRP increased to serum levels statistically indistinguishable from Gram-negative sepsis. Median peak levels of PCT (normal < 0.5 ng/ml)/CRP (normal < 8 mg/l) for groups A-F were 4.34/59.0 (A), 10.14/93.5 (B), 1.11/175.0 (C), 1.43/164 (D), 0.96/34.0 (E), and 8.14 ng/ml /126.0 mg/l (F). Highest single levels were observed in groups A and F.

CONCLUSIONS

PCT and CRP are of limited value as diagnostic markers of sepsis during T-cell-directed immunomodulatory treatment, granulocyte support, or acute GvHD.

Role of procalcitonin and CRP in differentiating a stable from a deteriorating clinical course in pediatric febrile neutropenia

In clinical practice, when neutropenic-fever patients present with no microbiologically and clinically defined infection, the risk of underestimating an occult infection is of major concern, the clinicians have to make a decision on when to modify antibiotic therapy. Hence, a reliable, specific, and sensitive marker, which is regulated independently from the leukocyte count and the underlying disease, is needed for the early diagnosis of infections in cases of neutropenic fever. We have evaluated the diagnostic and follow-up value of procalcitonin (PCT) compared with C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in documenting the infection in neutropenic-fever patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy, as evidenced by the durational change in these parameters in the presence of defined infection. Forty-nine patients, who had 60 febrile episodes, and who were hospitalized in the Hacettepe University Ihsan Doğramaci Children's Hospital between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2005 were included in this prospective study. All patients had been diagnosed with neutropenic fever after intensive chemotherapy. In our study, PCT and CRP levels were significantly higher in neutropenic-fever patients (group I and group II separately) than in control patients (P<0.001) throughout the study period; but erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels did not show any significant difference (P>0.05). In sequential analyses of patients without documented infections, the median of PCT concentrations shows a tendency to fall after the 8th hour of onset of fever, whereas in patients with documented infections PCT concentrations fell after the 48th hour. In conclusion, our study suggests that PCT, when measured periodically, is a more useful diagnostic inflammation parameter in pediatric neutropenic-fever patients than CRP, both in estimating the severity of the infection and, the duration and origin of the fever. Hence, PCT might be helpful when deciding on initial therapy modification.

[Procalcitonin measurement in adult clinical practice]

PURPOSE

The availability of a sensitive, specific and prognostic marker of bacterial infection is a major issue. More than ten years after the first publication assessing the usefulness of serum procalcitonin dosage (PCT), its exact place in the diagnostic process remained to be defined. The purpose of this review is to point out the indications of PCT measurement in clinical practice in the adult population.

RELEVANT DATA

PCT is an early, sensitive but above all specific marker of severe bacterial/parasitic infections. After being studied mostly in critically ill patients, the indications of PCT measurement have been extended to medical and emergency medicine practice, generating cut-off points between 0.2 and 0.6 microg/L. The medical area of application of PCT measurement is varied: discrimination between inflammatory disease and infectious complication or between bacterial/parasitic and viral infection, diagnosis of negative result gram staining meningitis or shock, assessment of antibiotic treatment efficiency. Moreover, PCT measurement provides outcome information in that sepsis-related raised PCT levels seem to be closely related to the magnitude of host systemic inflammatory response to microbial invasion. High PCT levels allow the early identification of patients prone to develop severe sepsis or septic shock.

PROSPECTS

After the first published study reporting the usefulness of PCT as a screening biological tool in emergency medicine, future studies will probably refined the place of PCT in such practice fields: decision about inpatient or outpatient management or antibiotics dispensation. Finally, PCT measurement could help physician in screening which septic patients should benefit from sepsis innovative therapeutics.

The evolution towards ambulatory and day-case management of febrile neutropenia

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is only second to chemotherapy administration as a cause of hospital admission during treatment for cancer. As FN may signify serious or life-threatening infection, management protocols have focussed on trying to prevent adverse outcomes in these patients. However, it is now possible to identify a subset of patients with FN at low risk of life-threatening complications in whom duration of hospitalisation and intensity of therapy can be reduced safely. This review discusses how the management of FN has evolved to enable patients identified as low risk to be treated on specific low risk management strategies, with an emphasis on some of the practical considerations for the implementation of such strategies.

Change of procalcitonin predicts clinical outcome of febrile episodes in patients with hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Procalcitonin (PCT) was widely investigated in febrile neutropenia as an indirect marker of infection. Many institutions also use PCT as a tool to monitor the course of a febrile episode because increases in PCT values during the febrile episode were associated with development of complications. However, to date, no study systematically evaluated the accuracy of decreasing PCT values in predicting favorable outcomes of a febrile episode. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in PCT values after resolution of fever with regard to their predictive value of stable defervescence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PCT was studied prospectively in 94 febrile episodes of 35 patients with hematological malignancies.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven episodes were associated with an increased level of PCT at the beginning. In these episodes, stable resolution of fever was significantly correlated with a decrease in PCT values. The best cut-off level to predict freedom from recurrence of fever for at least 5 days was <70% of the maximum PCT value on the second afebrile day. Out of 44 patient episodes with a subsequent decrease to <70%, only two patients had recurrent fever within the next 5 days, revealing a negative predictive value of 95%, p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the value of PCT as a reliable tool to predict clinical outcome in febrile neutropenia.

Risk assessment and treatment of low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia

Progress has been made in the development and validation of rules that attempt ito predict a low risk (<10%) of severe infection or clinical complications in patients with cancer, fever, and neutropenia. It is uncertain, however, which model is optimal, with respect to test characteristics, applicability, and interinstitutional reliability, and prospective model validation in a multicenter context among outpatients has not been performed. Clinical criteria, such as comorbidities and performance status, remain critical in the risk-assessment process and probably are used by most physicians caring for patients with cancer who are febrile and neutropenic. Clinical prediction rules might be improved in the future by including measurements of inflammatory markers, such as procalcitonin. Reliable prediction of the risk of medical complications may be relevant for decisions regarding parenteral versus oral antimicrobial therapy, but it is definitely needed for decisions regarding site of care. Site-of-care decisions require thorough assessment not only of medical criteria, but also of psychosocial and organizational and/or logistic criteria. If the appropriate infrastructure to provide follow-up is available, home-based therapy with oral (or parenteral) antibiotics is an acceptable option in the care of patients with cancer who have intercurrent febrile neutropenia and a predicted low risk for medical complications.