Short-term experience with early steroid withdrawal in African-American renal transplant recipients

New Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease and Its Management in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Cardiovascular events, including ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmia, are common complications after kidney transplantation and continue to be leading causes of graft loss. Kidney transplant recipients have both traditional and transplant-specific risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In the general population, modification of cardiovascular risk factors is the best strategy to reduce cardiovascular events; however, studies evaluating the impact of risk modification strategies on cardiovascular outcomes among kidney transplant recipients are limited. Furthermore, there is only minimal guidance on appropriate cardiovascular screening and monitoring in this unique patient population. This review focuses on the limited scientific evidence that addresses cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, we focus on clinical management of specific cardiovascular entities that are more prevalent among kidney transplant recipients (ie, pulmonary hypertension, valvular diseases, diastolic dysfunction) and the use of newer evolving drug classes for treatment of heart failure within this cohort of patients. We note that there are no consensus documents describing optimal diagnostic, monitoring, or management strategies to reduce cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation; however, we outline quality initiatives and research recommendations for the assessment and management of cardiovascular-specific risk factors that could improve outcomes.

Does steroid-free immunosuppression improve the outcome in kidney transplant recipients compared to conventional protocols?

Steroids continue to be the cornerstone of immune suppression since the early days of organ transplantation. Steroids are key component of induction protocols, maintenance therapy and in the treatment of various forms of rejection. Prolonged steroid use resulted in significant side effects on almost all the body organs owing to the presence of steroid receptors in most of the mammalian cells. Kidney allograft recipients had to accept the short and long term complications of steroids because of lack of effective alternatives. This situation changed with the intro-duction of newer and more effective immune suppression agents with a relatively more acceptable side effect profile. As a result, the clinicians have been contemplating if it is the time to abandon the unquestionable reliance on maintenance steroids in modern transplantation practice. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of various steroid-minimization approaches (steroid avoidance, early steroid withdrawal, and late steroid withdrawal) in kidney transplant recipients. A meticulous electronic search was conducted through the available data resources like SCOPUS, MEDLINE, and Liverpool University library e-resources. Relevant articles obtained through our search were included. A total number of 90 articles were eligible to be included in this review [34 randomised controlled trials (RCT) and 56 articles of other research modalities]. All articles were evaluating the safety and efficacy of various steroid-free approaches in comparison to maintenance steroids. We will cover only the RCT articles in this review. If used in right clinical context, steroid-free protocols proved to be comparable to steroid-based maintenance therapy. The appropriate approach should be tailored individually according to each recipient immuno-logical challenges and clinical condition.

Negative Cardiovascular Consequences of Small Molecule Immunosuppressants

Immunosuppressants are critical after transplantation and prescribed as immune-modulators for autoimmune disorders and glomerulonephritides. Immunosuppressants include large (e.g., thymoglobulin, alemtuzumab, and rituximab) and small molecules (e.g., corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors). The majority of the small molecules worsen traditional cardiovascular risks. This review describes cardiovascular risks of small molecule immunosuppressants: corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporine), and mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin), by categorizing these risks into two categories: ischemic heart disease and nonischemic cardiac effects.

Exploring genetic and non-genetic risk factors for delayed graft function, acute and subclinical rejection in renal transplant recipients

AIMS

This study aimed at identifying pharmacological factors such as pharmacogenetics and drug exposure as new predictive biomarkers for delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR) and/or subclinical rejection (SCR).

METHODS

Adult renal transplant recipients (n = 361) on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were followed for the first 6 months after transplantation. The incidence of DGF and AR were documented as well as the prevalence of SCR at 6 months in surveillance biopsies. Demographic, transplant-related factors, pharmacological and pharmacogenetic factors (ABCB1, CYP3A5, CYP3A4, CYP2C8, NR1I2, PPP3CA and PPP3CB) were analysed in a combined approach in relation to the occurrence of DGF, AR and prevalence of SCR at month 6 using a proportional odds model and time to event model.

RESULTS

Fourteen per cent of the patients experienced at least one clinical rejection episode and only DGF showed a significant effect on the time to AR. The incidence of DGF correlated with a deceased donor kidney transplant (27% vs. 0.6% of living donors). Pharmacogenetic factors were not associated with risk for DGF, AR or SCR. A deceased donor kidney and acute rejection history were the most important determinants for SCR, resulting in a 52% risk of SCR at 6 months (vs. 11% average). In a sub-analysis of the patients with AR, those treated with rejection treatment including ATG, significantly less frequent SCR was found in the 6-month biopsy (13% vs. 50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Transplant-related factors remain the most important determinants of DGF, AR and SCR. Furthermore, rejection treatment with depleting antibodies effectively prevented SCR in 6-month surveillance biopsies.

Impact of Maintenance Steroids versus Rapid Steroid Withdrawal in African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Two Urban Centers

Background

Rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW) is used increasingly in kidney transplantation but long-term outcomes in African-American (AA) recipients are not well known. We compared 1 and 5 year transplant outcomes in a large cohort of AA patients who were maintained on continued steroid therapy (CST) to those who underwent RSW.

Methods

Post-transplant courses of A as receiving kidney allografts from 2003–2011 at two urban transplant centers in Chicago were followed. Prior to outcome analysis, we used Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW) to match the two groups on a set of baseline risk factors. Graft and patient survival, GFR at 1 and 5 years, incidence and type of rejection, incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), delayed graft function, CMV and BK viremia were compared.

Results

There were 150 AA recipients in the CST analytic group and 157 in the RSW analytic group. Graft and patient survival was similar between the two groups. Rates of CMV viremia were higher in the RSW compared to the CST analytic group at 1 year. Biopsy-proven acute rejection and PTDM were similar between the RSW and CST groups.

Conclusions

In AA recipients, RSW has similar long-term outcomes to CST.

New directions for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin(®)) in solid organ transplants, stem cell transplants and autoimmunity

In the 30 years since the rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) Thymoglobulin^® was first licensed, its use in solid organ transplantation and hematology has expanded progressively. Although the evidence base is incomplete, specific roles for rATG in organ transplant recipients using contemporary dosing strategies are now relatively well-identified. The addition of rATG induction to a standard triple or dual regimen reduces acute cellular rejection, and possibly humoral rejection. It is an appropriate first choice in patients with moderate or high immunological risk, and may be used in low-risk patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing regimen from time of transplant, or if early steroid withdrawal is planned. Kidney transplant patients at risk of delayed graft function may also benefit from the use of rATG to facilitate delayed CNI introduction. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, rATG has become an important component of conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens, following demonstration of reduced acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. More recently, a role for rATG has also been established in reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. In autoimmunity, rATG contributes to the treatment of severe aplastic anemia, and has been incorporated in autograft projects for the management of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn’s disease, and systemic sclerosis. Finally, research is underway for the induction of tolerance exploiting the ability of rATG to induce immunosuppresive cells such as regulatory T-cells. Despite its long history, rATG remains a key component of the immunosuppressive armamentarium, and its complex immunological properties indicate that its use will expand to a wider range of disease conditions in the future.

Ten-year outcome after rapid discontinuation of prednisone in adult primary kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone after kidney transplantation potentially allows for minimization of steroid-related side effects. Although intermediate-term data with rapid discontinuation of prednisone have been promising, concern still exists regarding long-term outcomes. The 10-year experience is reported herein.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Between October 1, 1999 and December 31, 2010, 1241 adult primary kidney transplants (791 living donor and 450 deceased donor) were performed using a protocol in which prednisone is discontinued after postoperative day 5. The 10-year actuarial recipient and graft survival rates and prednisone-related side effects were studied.

RESULTS

Ten-year actuarial patient survival was 71% for living donor transplants and 62% for deceased donor transplants; 10-year graft survival was 61% for living donor transplants and 51% for deceased donor transplants, and was comparable to 10-year Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients national data. Ten-year death-censored graft survival was 79% for living donor transplants and 80% for deceased donor transplants. Ten-year acute rejection rates were 25% for deceased donor transplants and 31% for living donor transplants; 10-year chronic rejection (interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy) rates were 39% for deceased donor transplants and 47% for living donor transplants. For nondiabetic recipients of living donor or deceased donor allografts, the incidence of new-onset diabetes was significantly lower than in historical controls on prednisone (P<0.001). We also found significantly reduced rates of cataracts, avascular necrosis, and cytomegalovirus infection in some subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prednisone-related side effects can be minimized in a protocol incorporating rapid discontinuation of prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression. Ten-year patient and graft outcomes remain acceptable.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): 25 years and new frontiers in solid organ transplantation and haematology

The more than 25 years of clinical experience with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG), specifically Thymoglobulin, has transformed immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and haematology. The utility of rATG has evolved from the treatment of allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease to the prevention of various complications that limit the success of solid organ and stem cell transplantation. Today, rATG is being successfully incorporated into novel therapeutic regimens that seek to reduce overall toxicity and improve long-term outcomes. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of rATG in recipients of various types of solid organ allografts, recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants who are conditioned with both conventional and nonconventional regimens, and patients with aplastic anaemia. Over time, clinicians have learnt how to better balance the benefits and risks associated with rATG. Advances in the understanding of the multifaceted mechanism of action will guide research into new therapeutic areas and future applications.

Influence of African-American ethnicity on acute rejection after early steroid withdrawal in primary kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The influence of African-American ethnicity on outcomes of kidney transplant recipients subjected to early steroid withdrawal remains controversial. Recent studies that suggest no higher risk among African Americans may be biased by recruitment of relatively small number of African Americans or by patient selection. We compared outcomes of African Americans to non-African Americans in a center in which early steroid withdrawal has become the standard of practice.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study of 133 consecutive patients receiving primary kidney transplants between January 2006 and December 2008, followed for >or=3 months, and managed with a similar immunosuppression regimen that included induction antibody therapy, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and withdrawal of steroids on postoperative day 5. Acute rejection and other outcomes were compared in African-American patients (n = 55) and compared with those of non-African-American patients (n = 78).

RESULTS

During the first 12 months after early steroid withdrawal, African-American patients experienced a significantly higher cumulative incidence of acute rejection than non-African Americans (23.6% vs 7.7%; P = .020). Using multivariate logistic regression, ethnicity (odds ratio 3.33; P = .047) and HLA mismatch (odds ratio 1.44; P = .041) were significantly correlated with acute rejection independent of recipient age, gender, historical peak panel reactive antibody level (PRA) or PRA at time of transplant, time on dialysis, or donor source.

CONCLUSIONS

African Americans are at increased risk of acute rejection after early steroid withdrawal, particularly when they receive kidneys from poorly matched donors.

[Transplantation without corticosteroids]

Used in kidney transplantation to prevent and treat rejection, corticosteroids induce a number of adverse side effects over the long term. With the arrival of new immunosuppressive drugs, trials on rapid corticosteroid interruption, a few days or weeks after transplantation, and transplantation without corticosteroids other than the intraoperative bolus, have been conducted in patients at low immunological risk and on particular patient profiles such as children and Afro-Americans. These studies show that early cessation of corticosteroids, whether in these two categories of patients or in patients at low immunological risk, make it possible to reduce the adverse side effects with no harmful influence on patient or graft survival or renal function. The increase in the rejection rate observed with this procedure has no consequences over the medium term after treatment. However, for full success, this strategy must absolutely be carried out under the cover of an induction and an immunosuppressive bitherapy. In these conditions, early interruption of corticosteroids also has beneficial effects over the longer term: it encourages the reduction in the frequency and/or severity of diabetes, weight gain, hypertension, or dyslipidemia and seems to better preserve patients'bone status.

African American kidney transplantation survival: the ability of immunosuppression to balance the inherent pre- and post-transplant risk factors

Among organ transplant recipients, the African American population historically has received special attention. This is because secondary to their disposition to certain disease states, for example hypertension, an African American patient has a propensity to reach end-stage renal disease and require renal replacement earlier than a Caucasian patient. Regardless of the initiative to replace dialysis therapy with organ transplantation, the African American patient has many barriers to kidney transplantation, thus extending their time on dialysis and waiting time on the organ transplant list. These factors are among the many negative causes of decreased kidney graft survival, realized before kidney transplantation. Unfortunately, once the African American recipient receives a kidney graft, the literature documents that many post-transplant barriers exist which limit successful outcomes. The primary post-transplant barrier relates to designing proper immunosuppression protocols. The difficulty in designing protocols revolves around (i) altered genetic metabolism/lower absorption, (ii) increased immuno-active cytokines and (iii) detrimental effects of noncompliance. Based on the literature, dosing of immunosuppression must be aggressive and requires a diligent practitioner. Research has indicated that, despite some success with proven levels of immunosuppression, the African American recipient usually requires a higher 'dose per weight' regimen. However, even with aggressive immunosuppressant dosing, African Americans still have worse outcomes than Caucasian recipients. Additionally, many of the targeted sites of action that immunosuppression exerts its effects on have been found to be amplified in the African American population. Finally, noncompliance is the most discouraging inhibitor of long-term success in organ transplantation. The consequences of noncompliance are biased by ethnicity and affect the African American population more severely. All of these factors are discussed further in this review in the hope of identifying an ideal healthcare model for caring for the African American transplant recipient, from diagnosing chronic kidney disease through to successful kidney graft outcomes. An indepth review of the literature is described and organized in a fashion that highlights all of the issues affecting success in African Americans. The compilation of the literature in this review will enable the reader to get closer to understanding the caveats of kidney transplantation in the African American patient, but falls short of delivering an actual 'equation' for post-transplant care in an African American kidney recipient.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of acute renal allograft rejection

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) [Thymoglobulin(R); Thymoglobuline(R)] is a purified, pasteurized preparation of polyclonal gamma immunoglobulin raised in rabbits against human thymocytes that is indicated for the prevention and/or treatment of renal transplant rejection in several countries worldwide. rATG induction in combination with immunosuppressive therapy is more effective in preventing episodes of acute renal graft rejection in adult renal transplant recipients than immunosuppressive therapy without induction. The efficacy of rATG induction is generally better than that of equine antithymocyte globulin (eATG) induction and generally no different from that of basiliximab or low-dose daclizumab induction in this patient population. However, in high-risk patients, rATG induction was more effective than daclizumab or basiliximab induction in preventing acute renal graft rejection. In the treatment of renal graft rejection in adult renal transplant recipients, rATG was more effective than eATG in terms of the successful response rate, although the agents generally did not differ with regard to most other endpoints. Both induction and treatment with rATG are generally well tolerated, although adverse events, such as fever, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, appear more common with rATG than with other antibody preparations. The overall incidence of infection associated with rATG induction was generally no different from that seen with eATG or basiliximab induction, although was higher with rATG than with basiliximab in high-risk patients. The incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease generally did not differ between rATG and eATG induction, and there was no significant difference between rATG and daclizumab induction with regard to the incidence of CMV infections or the proportion of patients who received treatment for a CMV episode or infection. Relative to basiliximab, the incidence of CMV infection was generally higher with rATG, except in high-risk patients. In the treatment of acute renal rejection, the nature and incidence of infections were generally similar with rATG and eATG. The incidence of malignancies is generally low with rATG therapy and generally does not differ from that seen with other agents. Further prospective comparative studies would be beneficial in order to definitively position rATG with respect to other antibody preparations. In the meantime, available clinical data suggest that rATG is an effective and generally well tolerated option for the prevention and treatment of acute renal graft rejection in renal transplant recipients.

Renal transplantation with early steroid withdrawal

Steroids are effective immunosuppressants in renal transplantation but are associated with significant adverse effects. As a result, there has been increased interest in protocols utilizing steroid minimization. Initial trials stopped steroids at approximately 3 months, when the highest risk phase for acute rejection was over. As two randomized trials using cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil without induction therapy showed an unacceptably high acute rejection rate, more recent interest has focused on the cessation of steroids very early, usually within the first week after transplantation. Most protocols have used antibody induction combined with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid derivatives. Uncontrolled studies have shown a low rate of acute rejection, but the most recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated an increased risk of acute rejection. These trials have not shown any consistent difference in short-term patient or graft survival. Cardiovascular risk factors do not appear to be consistently improved by early steroid withdrawal. Most trials lack sufficient follow-up (5 years or more) to assess the impact of the increased acute rejection rate seen with early steroid withdrawal on long-term outcomes. Thus, the use of such protocols remains investigational.

Minimization of steroids in kidney transplantation

The goal of steroid minimization trials has been to minimize or eliminate steroid-related side-effects while simultaneously not increasing the rate of acute rejection (AR) and chronic graft loss. Early trials of late steroid withdrawal (> or =3 months post-transplant) were associated with significantly increased AR rates and late graft loss. More recent trials of rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) (< or =7 days post-transplant) have been associated with little or no increase in AR rates and no difference in graft survival (versus maintenance prednisone). Of note, induction therapy appears to be important for success; however, it is not clear if any single maintenance protocol is superior. Intermediate-term follow-up (5-7 years) is now available for some randomized and nonrandomized trials; graft survival and renal function remain excellent. Most of these trials have been done in low immunologic risk recipients, but there are reports of success of RDP in children, black recipients, sensitized recipients, recipients with potentially recurring disease, and kidney-pancreas recipients. Of critical importance, steroid-related side-effects have been minimized. Steroid minimization protocols can clearly be recommended for low-risk patients; additional trials are necessary for those at higher risk. Additional research is also necessary on integrating calcineurin inhibitor minimization with steroid minimization.

Steroid elimination-who, when, how?

Steroids have numerous side effects, many occurring early posttransplantation with relatively low prednisone doses. Consequently, investigators have attempted steroid minimization or withdrawal. The first attempts at steroid minimization used early low-dose steroids and were associated with an increased rate of acute rejection episodes, late graft dysfunction, and graft loss. Subsequent studies, with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, attempted steroid withdrawal late posttransplantation (>3 months) in highly selected, clinically well, and immunologically low-risk recipients. Again, steroid withdrawal was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection episodes and these episodes were associated with graft dysfunction and increased graft loss. The development of new powerful immunosuppressive agents has led to renewed attempts at late prednisone withdrawal. These also have been associated with increased late rejection risk. A more exciting innovation has been the attempts at rapid discontinuation ( Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects
• Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use
• Clinical Trials as Topic
• Drug Administration Schedule
• Drug Therapy, Combination
• Graft Rejection/epidemiology
• Graft Rejection/prevention & control
• Graft Survival/drug effects
• Graft Survival/physiology
• Humans
• Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
• Kidney Transplantation/immunology
• Prednisone/adverse effects

Collapse

Grants

• P01 DK013083 NIDDK NIH HHS
• DK 13083 NIDDK NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

A J Matas Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Collapse

Transplant-associated hyperglycemia

As patient survival after solid organ transplantation continues to improve, comorbidites associated with chronic hyperglycemia will assume increasing importance in limiting outcomes and quality of life. New-onset diabetes mellitus commonly occurs in the posttransplant setting and is associated with multiple complications including graft loss, cardiovascular disease, infection, and death. Furthermore, recent studies have begun to highlight the very high posttransplant prevalence and the significant cardiovascular implications of the prediabetic states of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance, indicating that the overall burden of transplantation-associated hyperglycemia is far greater than previously appreciated. Shared and distinct pathogenic factors and clinical repercussions exist among the organ-specific transplant scenarios. Diabetogenic immunosuppressive agents are common to all organ transplant settings, whereas glucose regulation is also strained by the restoration of failed hepatic and renal function. The atherogenic properties of hyperglycemia are particularly significant in the kidney transplant population, which has a marked predisposition to cardiovascular disease, whereas accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy and liver fibrosis have been associated with hyperglycemia in the heart and liver transplant settings, respectively. Aggressive screening will effectively detect transplant-associated hyperglycemia, whereas risk factor modification, lifestyle intervention and, where appropriate, drug therapy, may decrease its impact. Topics of future investigation should include the use of emerging diabetes therapies and avenues for the prevention and reversal of transplant-associated hyperglycemia.

Preliminary experience with renal transplantation in HIV+ recipients: low acute rejection and infection rates

BACKGROUND

Only four centers have reported their results with renal transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)+ recipients on highly active antiretroviral therapy, and acute rejection (AR) rates have consistently ranged from 43% to 67%.

METHODS

We examined the outcomes of eight adult HIV+ primary renal allograft recipients with median 15 (range 8-47) months follow-up with multiple other high-risk factors, including African American ethnicity, hepatitis C virus (HCV) positivity, long waiting times, prior sensitization, paucity of live donors, and delayed graft function. Our immunosuppressive protocol consisted of an anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporin A, and prednisone for maintenance. Initial and 3- to 6-month cyclosporin A trough level targets were 250 to 300 and 225 to 275 ng/mL, respectively, and mycophenolate mofetil dose was adjusted according to 2 to 4 week surveillance and subsequent as needed mycophenolic acid predose concentrations during the first 6 months.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival were 100% and 88%, respectively, with an AR rate of 13% and excellent renal function. No patients developed new-onset diabetes, opportunistic or other serious infections, malignancy, or progression of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease. Excellent suppression of HIV replication with maintenance of CD4 counts was noted in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that HIV+ patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy can undergo successful renal transplantation with a low incidence of both AR and AIDS-associated and non-AIDS associated infections, despite associated risk factors for poorer outcome. Our encouraging but preliminary results with this protocol will need to be verified in larger numbers of HIV+ renal allograft recipients with longer follow-up.

Thymoglobulin dose optimization for induction therapy in high risk kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Thymoglobulin (rATG) has become the agent of choice for induction therapy in high immunological risk kidney transplant recipients. However, its optimal dosing in this subgroup has not been studied.

METHODS

To evaluate the effect of total rATG dosing on graft outcomes in such patients, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 96 adult patients who received repeat transplants (85%) or had panel reactive antibody more than 40% (19%) and were maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid. Group 1 (n=33) received less than or equal to 7.5 and group 2 (n=63) received more than 7.5 mg/kg rATG. Graft and patient survival, incidence of acute rejection (AR), and 12-month serum creatinine (SCr) were examined.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable regarding demographics, donor source, retransplantation, panel reactive antibody, and human leukocyte antigen mismatch. Group 2 had more African Americans (44.4% vs. 21.2%, P=0.03). During the 25.4+/-18.0 months follow-up graft survival was 82.5% and 79.4%, respectively (P=0.54). Three in group 1 and four in group 2 died (P=0.65). The incidence of biopsy proven AR during the first 12-months did not differ between the groups (9.5% vs. 8.8%, respectively, P=0.9). SCr at 12 months was 1.6+/-0.7 in group 1 and 1.8+/-1.0 in group 2 (P=0.3). There was no independent association between rATG dose and graft survival (hazard ratio: 0.85, P=0.79, 95% CI: 0.26-2.7 for group 2 vs. 1) or 1-year SCr (regression coefficient=0.02 for ln(SCr), P=0.3; 95%CI: -0.01 to 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in high risk kidney transplant recipients total rATG doses less than or equal to 7.5 mg/kg are safe and effective in achieving a low rate of AR and graft outcomes comparable to higher doses.

Long-term outcome of early steroid withdrawal after kidney transplantation in African American recipients monitored by surveillance biopsy

Generally chronic steroid therapy is standard care for African American (AA) kidney recipients because of their higher incidence of rejections and lower long-term graft survival. This prospective study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal (ESW) in AA recipients. A total of 206 recipients were studied; 103 AA and 103 non-AA recipients monitored by serial surveillance biopsies from 1 to 60 months posttransplantation to evaluate subclinical acute rejections (SCAR) and chronic allograft injury (CAI). Biopsy-proven clinical acute rejections (BPAR) and SCAR were treated. Primary end point was BPAR and secondary end points were 5-year SCAR, CAI and survival. Incidences of BPAR was 16% versus 14% (p = 1.0), prevalence of CAI due to hypertension was 48% versus 30% (p = 0.05) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy was 47% versus 32% (p = 0.05) and the mean serum creatinine levels were 2.1 versus 1.8 mg/dL (p = 0.05) at 5-years in AA versus non-AA recipients. The incidence of SCAR was 23% versus 11% at 1 month (p = 0.04), 12% versus 3% at 3 years (p = 0.04) and 10% versus 1% at 5 years (p = 0.04) in AA and non-AA recipients, respectively. Five-year patient survivals were 81% and 88% (p = 0.09) and graft survivals were 71% and 73%(p = 0.19) in AA and non-AA groups, respectively. After early steroid withdrawal AA kidney recipients have significantly lower renal function and higher SCAR and CAI but 5-year graft survival are comparable to non-AA recipients.

Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result

Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival can be achieved with cyclosporine and tacrolimus (CNI)-based immunosuppressive protocols that incorporate antiproliferative immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. However, despite short-term success, long-term attrition of graft function and side effects of immunosuppressive agents continue to be significant problems, leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may contribute to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Metabolic, cosmetic, and neuropsychiatric complications of steroids affect quality of life after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs or steroids altogether. In this report we review studies that address either CNI or steroid minimization strategies and discuss their risks versus benefits. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion the use of CNIs and steroids as part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI and steroid minimization strategies needs to be further validated in controlled clinical trials with adequate long-term follow-up.

Management of cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of graft loss and the leading cause of death in renal transplant recipients. Although there are robust data on the frequency of risk factors and their contributions to cardiovascular disease in this population, few trials have demonstrated the benefit of modifying these risk factors to reduce cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, it is widely accepted that the clinical acumen filtered through the best available studies in the general population be used to treat individual renal transplant recipients given their high cardiovascular mortality. Transplant task forces and the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative have created guidelines for this purpose. This review examines the data available for prevention and treatment of major risk factors contributing to cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients. The contribution of immunosuppressive agents to each risk factor and the evidence to support lifestyle modification as well as drug therapy are examined. Reducing cardiovascular risk factors requires an integrative approach that is best accomplished by a team of health care professionals. It creates a significant challenge but one that must be met if allograft survival is to improve.

Intermediate-term outcomes with early steroid withdrawal in African-American renal transplant recipients undergoing surveillance biopsy

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding the use of early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW) in African-American renal allograft recipients, and very few reports with >or=1 year follow-up in all patients.

METHODS

We examined the outcomes of 57 African-American renal allograft recipients with minimum follow-up 12 months who did not receive maintenance steroids after day 4 posttransplant. All patients received thymoglobulin induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and initial tacrolimus (n = 48) or sirolimus (n = 9).

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival were 98% and 96% at 1 year, and 95% and 89% over the entire follow-up period (mean, 23 +/- 8 months). Incidence of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection were 18% and 7%, respectively, with mean serum creatinine 1.6 +/- 0.5 and 1.7 +/- 0.9 mg/dL at 6 and 12 months. Of patients with functioning grafts, 84% remained steroid free at 1 year, of which 11 (24%) were also calcineurin inhibitor free. Twenty-seven patients underwent surveillance biopsy at 1 month and 28 at 12 months, with 15 surveyed at both time points. There were significant increases in only 2 of the 6 1997 Banff chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) category scores in this subgroup, with all mean values remaining <1 (mild in severity) at 1 year. Overall, from 82% to 96% of the 12-month scores were <or=1 in all categories for 28 patients; only 3 patients (11%) had interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy scores at least moderate in severity. We did not observe any cases of subclinical acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ESW in African-American renal allograft recipients with multiple high-risk factors can produce excellent intermediate-term antirejection and graft functional outcomes with minimal development of CAN at 12 months. Our results will need to be verified in larger numbers of patients with longer follow-up.

Corticosteroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation: the present status

Corticosteroids (CS) have played a vital role in organ transplantation, both for prevention and treatment of allograft rejection. However, the use of CS is associated with a wide range of adverse effects. With advances in immunosuppressive drug therapy, attempts have been made to minimize the use of CS to avoid or alleviate their side effects. Withdrawal of CS months after transplantation has transitioned to days. In low to intermediate risk renal allograft recipients, use of induction therapy and modern maintenance drug combinations allows safe withdrawal of CS within the first week of transplantation. In other groups, existing potent maintenance agents permit tapering of CS to low doses over the first few months. Withdrawal of these small doses may not add to the benefits.

Transplant-associated hyperglycemia: a new look at an old problem

New-onset diabetes has long been recognized as a common complication of kidney transplantation, promoting cardiovascular disease, death, and graft failure. Studies in recent years have begun to highlight the very high posttransplantation prevalence of the prediabetic states of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance and the significant repercussions of these states on cardiovascular health. Therefore, the overall burden of transplant-associated hyperglycemia (TAH), which encompasses new-onset diabetes and the prediabetic states, is far greater than previously appreciated. The kidney transplant population is predisposed to insulin resistance and to additional insults of hypertension and hyperlipidemia that, together with hyperglycemia, compose the metabolic syndrome and promote atherosclerosis. When recipients with an underlying, frequently nonmodifiable predisposition to glucose dysregulation encounter transplant-specific, often modifiable, diabetogenic exposures, TAH manifests. Aggressive screening will effectively detect TAH, whereas risk factor modification, lifestyle intervention, and, when appropriate, drug therapy may decrease its impact. Topics of future investigation should include the use of emerging diabetes therapies and avenues for the prevention and reversal of TAH.