Clinical benefits of antiviral therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Effectiveness of Direct-acting Agents After Liver Transplantation and Regression of Biomarkers Post-HCV Treatment: A Real-life Study in Rio de Janeiro

BACKGROUND

Data concerning hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment using direct-acting agents (DAAs) post liver transplantation (LT) remains scarce in low- and average-income countries.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of post-LT HCV treatment using DAAs in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), and to assess the course of hepatic biomarkers after sustained virological response (SVR).

METHODS

Data from LT recipients with recurrent HCV treated using DAAs was retrospectively analyzed. HCV was defined by detectable HCV-RNA with elevated aminotransferases and/or histological signs of infection on liver biopsy post LT. SVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Aspartate-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) were calculated before treatment and after SVR.

RESULTS

116 patients (63% male, median age 62 years, 75% genotype 1 and 62% with hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] prior to LT) were included. Cirrhosis was identified in the allograft of 21 subjects (18%). The overall SVR was 96.6% without differences in SVR proportion according to clinical/demographic characteristics, genotype or presence of cirrhosis. SVR rates were similar in individuals with and without HCC pre-LT (95.8% [95% CI: 87.6-98.7] vs. 97.7% [95% CI: 85.0-99.7%], p = 0.588). No serious adverse events were observed and the use of ribavirin was associated with at least one adverse event (OR = 8.71 [95% CI: 3.17-23.99]). SVR was associated with regression of APRI (OR = 26.00 [95% CI 4.27-1065.94]) and FIB-4 (OR = 15.00 [95% CI: 2.30-631.47]).

CONCLUSION

Post-LT HCV treatment with DAAs was safe and effective and associated with a significant decrease in hepatic biomarker levels after SVR.

Therapy of Chronic Viral Hepatitis: The Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Chronic viral hepatitis determines significant morbidity and mortality globally and is caused by three main etiological actors (Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, and Hepatitis D Virus) with different replicative cycles and biological behaviors. Thus, therapies change according to the different characteristics of the viruses. In chronic hepatitis B, long term suppressive treatments with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues have had a dramatic impact on the evolution of liver disease and liver-related complications. However, a conclusive clearance of the virus is difficult to obtain; new strategies that are able to eradicate the infection are currently objects of research. The therapy for Hepatitis D Virus infection is challenging due to the unique virology of the virus, which uses the synthetic machinery of the infected hepatocyte for its own replication and cannot be targeted by conventional antivirals that are active against virus-coded proteins. Recently introduced antivirals, such as bulevertide and lonafarnib, display definite but only partial efficacy in reducing serum HDV-RNA. However, in combination with pegylated interferon, they provide a synergistic therapeutic effect and appear to represent the current best therapy for HDV-positive patients. With the advent of Direct Acting Antiviral Agents (DAAs), a dramatic breakthrough has occurred in the therapeutic scenario of chronic hepatitis C. Cure of HCV infection is achieved in more than 95% of treated patients, irrespective of their baseline liver fibrosis status. Potentially, the goal of global HCV elimination by 2030 as endorsed by the World Health Organization can be obtained if more global subsidised supplies of DAAs are provided.

Outcomes in Hepatitis C Positive Liver Transplantation: Timing of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment and Impact on Graft Fibrosis

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related disease has the lowest five-year graft survival among all liver transplant recipients. Graft failure due to accelerated fibrosis from unrestrained HCV replication is common. Optimal timing of HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents remains unknown. We compared HCV liver transplant recipients successfully treated for HCV before transplant to those treated within 1 year of transplant to determine if graft fibrosis, measured by Fib-4 scores, differs with timing of treatment. Fib-4 scores less than or equal to 1.45 defined minimal fibrosis and greater than 1.45 defined greater than minimal fibrosis. We identified 117 liver transplant recipients: 52 treated before transplantation and 65 treated within 1 year of transplantation. Overall, 34% of recipients had minimal fibrosis, and the likelihood of having minimal fibrosis following treatment and liver transplantation did not differ by timing of treatment. The odds ratio of having greater than minimal fibrosis was 0.65 (95% CI 0.30, 1.42) among those treated within 1 year after transplantation compared to those treated before transplantation (p-value 0.28). Importantly, nearly 2/3 of these patients had evidence of fibrosis progression one year after sustained virologic response, supporting recommendations for early antiviral-based treatment to prevent accumulation of HCV-related disease.

EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series☆

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease, with approximately 71 million chronically infected individuals worldwide. Clinical care for patients with HCV-related liver disease has advanced considerably thanks to an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, as well as developments in diagnostic procedures and improvements in therapy and prevention. These therapies make it possible to eliminate hepatitis C as a major public health threat, as per the World Health Organization target, although the timeline and feasibility vary from region to region. These European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C describe the optimal management of patients with recently acquired and chronic HCV infections in 2020 and onwards.

Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir are safe and effective in treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus in Egyptian patients underwent living donor liver transplantation

Background

Liver transplant population has been considered as a special population in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection, not only because of lower sustained virological response (SVR) rates in comparison with pretransplant setting, but also for other aspects (i.e., immunosuppressive therapy, renal function, drug–drug interactions). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with or without ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C following transplantation and screening for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma during treatment, after the end of treatment, or during follow-up. This multicenteric prospective study was conducted in Egypt. This study included 40 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation that started treatment at least 3 months following transplantation. All participants received 400 mg sofosbuvir once daily plus daclatasvir 60 mg daily ± ribavirin. Treatment lasted for up to 24 weeks, and participants were followed up as outpatients monthly for 12 and 24 weeks and 36 weeks post-treatment to determine sustained virological response (SVR12 and SVR24), considered to be a cure and detection of any changes in tumor markers or radiological imaging during follow-up.

Results

In the current study, 40 patients (100%) have good response to treatment during treatment and during follow-up (SVR 12 was 100%). No abnormal side effects to treatment were detected; also, no drug–drug interactions were noted during the treatment.

Conclusions

Treatment of HCV after living donor liver transplantation with combined sofosbuvir and daclatasvir is safe and well-tolerated and provides high rates of SVR.

Immediate administration of antiviral therapy after transplantation of hepatitis C-infected livers into uninfected recipients: Implications for therapeutic planning

The practice of transplanting hepatitis C (HCV)-infected livers into HCV-uninfected recipients has not previously been recommended in transplant guidelines, in part because of concerns over uncontrolled HCV infection of the allograft. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) provide an opportunity to treat donor-derived HCV-infection and should be administered early in the posttransplant period. However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of an immediate DAA treatment approach, including how to manage logistical barriers surrounding timely DAA procurement, are required prior to broader use of HCV-positive donor organs. We report the results of a trial in which 14 HCV-negative patients underwent successful liver transplantation from HCV-positive donors. Nine patients received viremic (nucleic acid testing [NAT]-positive) livers and started a 12-week course of oral glecaprevir-pibrentasvir within 5 days of transplant. Five patients received livers from HCV antibody-positive nonviremic donors and were followed using a reactive approach. Survival in NAT-positive recipients is 100% at a median follow-up of 46 weeks. An immediate treatment approach for HCV NAT-positive liver transplantation into uninfected recipients is safe and efficacious. Securing payer approval for DAAs early in the posttransplant course could enable need-based allocation of HCV-positive donor organs irrespective of candidate HCV status, while averting chronic HCV allograft infection.

Long-Term Follow-up of Liver Transplant Recipients Treated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Recurrence After Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LTX) with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) is effective and leads to sustained viral response (SVR) in most cases. Long-term effect of HCV elimination on LTX function is not clear. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term influence of DAA with HCV on the liver function in LTX recipients.

METHODS

The study included 120 LTX patients with HCV recurrence. Before starting DAA therapy, all patients underwent liver biopsy and elastography. Biochemical tests and HCV viremia were assessed at baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks and 24 months after the end of treatment (EOT). The study protocol conformed with the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

In the HCV genotype 1 (G1) group, 106 patients were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin (RBV), and 3 patients received paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir/RBV. All HCV genotype 3 (G3) patients were treated with sofosbuvir/RBV; all HCV genotype 4 (G4) patients were treated with paritaprevir/ombitasvir/RBV. The efficacy of the treatment defined as SVR at week 12 after EOT (SVR12) was 97.3% in G1 group, 75% in G3, and 100% in G4 group. Median alanine (ALT) and aspartate (AST) transaminase before therapy were 44.0 IU/mL and 42.5 IU/mL, respectively. Median ALT and AST at 24 months after EOT were 17 IU/mL and 22 IU/mL, respectively. The lack of transaminases normalization was observed in 10 patients 24 months after EOT.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of DAA therapy of HCV recurrence after LTX is as high as that reported in randomized clinical trials. It is also associated with the improvement of liver function tests during long-term follow-up.

Highly effective treatment response and well tolerability by all oral direct acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C patients post organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressant-related acceleration of fibrosis has been documented in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients who receive organ transplantation (Tx), and sustained virological response (SVR) rates for these patients by pegylated interferon (IFN)-based therapy are generally poor and associated with unfavorable safety profiles. In addition, IFN treatment varies by patient and poses a high risk of post-renal Tx graft rejection. This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of all oral direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for CHC patients following organ Tx.

METHODS

A total of 32 organ Tx (liver: 17, kidney: 13, kidney then liver: 1, and heart: 1) patients with CHC on an oral DAA (paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir: 11, daclatasvir and asunaprevir: 4, sofosbuvir-based: 17) were enrolled in the study. DAAs regimen was based by genotype/subtype, patient characteristics, drug interaction profiles, and health insurance coverage.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 61.4 ± 9.5 years, 50.0% male, and 15.6% with cirrhosis. Fourteen (43.7%) patients experienced unsuccessful IFN treatment. Genotype distribution was as follows: 1a: 6, 1b: 17, 2: 7, 3: 1, and 6: 1. Mean time between Tx and DAAs therapy was 77.3 ± 11.0 months. Baseline HCV RNA before DAAs was 6.20 ± 0.19 log10 IU/mL. After DAAs, the distribution of week 2 HCV RNA was as follows: <15 IU/mL (53.1%), 15 to 50 IU/mL (15.6%), 50 to 100 IU/mL (6.3%), and >100 IU/mL (25.0%), respectively. The rates of undetectable HCV RNA (<15 IU/mL) at week 4 and end-of-treatment were 93.8% and 100%, respectively. Subjective adverse events during therapy were generally mild, with no treatment terminations. After posttreatment follow-up, all 32 patients (100%) achieved SVR12.

CONCLUSION

Highly responsive treatment and favorable tolerability were achieved by all oral DAAs in this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Post liver transplant recurrent and de novo viral infections

Survival following liver transplantation has changed dramatically owing to improvement in surgical techniques, peri-operative care and optimal immunosuppressive therapy. Post-Liver transplant (LT) de novo or recurrent viral infection continues to cause major allograft dysfunction, leading to poor graft and patient survival in untreated patients. Availability of highly effective antiviral drugs has significantly improved post-LT survival. Patients transplanted for chronic hepatitis B infection should receive life-long nucleos(t)ide analogues, with or without HBIg for effective viral control. Patients with chronic hepatitis C should be commenced on directly acting antiviral (DAA) drugs prior to transplantation. DAA therapy for post-LT recurrent hepatitis C infection is associated with close to 100% sustained virological response (SVR), irrespective of genotype. De novo chronic Hepatitis E infection is an increasingly recognised cause of allograft dysfunction in LT recipients. Untreated chronic HEV infection of the graft may lead to liver fibrosis and allograft failure. CMV and EBV can reactivate leading to systemic illness following liver transplantation. With COVID-19 pandemic, post-transplant patients are at risk of SARS-Co-V2 infection. Majority of the LT recipients require hospitalization, and the mortality in this population is around 20%. Early recognition of allograft dysfunction and identification of viral aetiology is essential in the management of post-LT de novo or recurrent infections. Optimising immunosuppression is an important step in reducing the severity of allograft damage in the treatment of post-transplant viral infections. Viral clearance or control can be achieved by early initiation of high potency antiviral therapy.

Pre-emptive pangenotypic direct acting antiviral therapy in donor HCV-positive to recipient HCV-negative heart transplantation: an open-label study

BACKGROUND

Low donor heart availability underscores the need to identify all potentially transplantable organs. We sought to determine whether pre-emptive administration of pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral therapy can safely prevent the development of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in uninfected recipients of HCV-infected donor hearts.

METHODS

Patients were recruited for this an open-label, single-centre, proof-of-concept study from Nov 1, 2017, to Nov 30, 2018. Following enrolment, the recipient's status on the heart transplantation waiting list was updated to reflect a willingness to accept either an HCV-positive or HCV-negative heart donor. Patients who underwent transplantation with a viraemic donor heart, as determined by nucleic acid testing (NAT), received pre-emptive oral glecaprevir-pibrentasvir before transport to the operating room followed by an 8-week course of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir after transplantation. Patients receiving HCV antibody-positive donor hearts without detectable circulating HCV RNA were followed using a reactive approach and started glecaprevir-pibrentasvir only if they developed viraemia. The primary outcome was achievement of sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir therapy (SVR12). Patients were followed from study enrolment to 1 year after transplantation. This is an interim analysis, initiated after all enrolled patients reached the primary outcome. Results reflect data from Nov 1, 2017, to May 30, 2019. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03208244.

FINDINGS

55 patients were assessed for eligibility and 52 consented to enrolment. 25 patients underwent heart transplantation with HCV-positive donor hearts (20 NAT-positive, five NAT-negative), three of whom underwent simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation. All 20 recipients of NAT-positive hearts tolerated glecaprevir-pibrentasvir and showed rapid viral suppression (median time to clearance 3·5 days, IQR 0·0-8·3), with the subsequent achievement of SVR12 by all 20. The five recipients of NAT-negative grafts did not become viraemic. Median pre-transplant waiting time for patients following enrolment in the HCV protocol was 20 days (IQR 8-57). Patient and allograft survival were 100% at a median follow-up of 10·7 months (range 6·5-18·0).

INTERPRETATION

Pre-emptive administration of glecaprevir-pibrentasvir therapy results in expedited organ transplantation, rapid HCV suppression, prevention of chronic HCV infection, and excellent early allograft function in patients receiving HCV-infected donor hearts. Long-term outcomes are not yet known.

FUNDING

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Cost Effectiveness of Transplanting HCV-Infected Livers Into Uninfected Recipients With Preemptive Antiviral Therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines do not recommend transplanting hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected livers into HCV-uninfected recipients. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) can be used to treat donor-derived HCV infection. However, the added cost of DAA therapy is a barrier. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of transplanting HCV-positive livers into HCV-negative patients with preemptive DAA therapy.

METHODS

A previously validated Markov-based mathematical model was adapted to simulate a virtual trial of HCV-negative patients on the liver transplant waitlist. The model compared long-term clinical and economic outcomes in patients willing to accept only HCV-negative livers vs those willing to accept any liver (HCV negative or HCV positive). Recipients of HCV-positive livers received 12 weeks of preemptive DAA therapy. The model incorporated data from the United Network for Organ Sharing and published sources.

RESULTS

For patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥ 22, accepting any liver vs waiting for only HCV-negative livers was cost effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $56,100 to $91,700/quality-adjusted life-year. For patients with a MELD score of 28 (the median MELD score of patients undergoing transplantation in the United States), accepting any liver was cost effective at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $62,600/quality-adjusted life year. In patients with low MELD scores, which may not accurately reflect disease severity, accepting any liver was cost effective, irrespective of MELD score.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a Markov-based mathematical model, we found transplanting HCV-positive livers into HCV-negative patients with preemptive DAA therapy to be a cost-effective strategy that could improve health outcomes.

The Changing Face of Liver Transplantation in the United States: The Effect of HCV Antiviral Eras on Transplantation Trends and Outcomes

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis is the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States, although nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is on the rise. Increasingly effective HCV antivirals are available, but their association with diagnosis-specific liver transplantation rates and early graft survival is not known.

Methods

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database records were retrospectively stratified by HCV antiviral era: interferon (2003-2010), protease inhibitors (2011-2013), and direct-acting antivirals (2014 to present). Kaplan-Meier, χ², and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated the effects of antiviral era and etiology of liver disease on transplantation rates and graft survival over 3 years.

Results

Liver transplants for HCV decreased (35.3% to 23.6%), whereas those for NASH and alcoholic liver disease increased (5.8% to 16.5% and 15.6% to 24.0%) with each advancing era (all P < 0.05). Early graft survival improved with each advancing era for HCV but not for hepatitis B virus, NASH, or alcoholic liver disease (multivariable model era by diagnosis interaction P < 0.001). Era-specific multivariable models demonstrated that the risk of early graft loss for NASH was 22% lower than for HCV in the interferon era (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.96; P = 0.02) but risks associated with these diagnoses did not differ significantly in the protease inhibitor (P = 0.06) or direct-acting antiviral eras (P = 0.08).

Conclusions

Increasing effectiveness of HCV antivirals corresponds with decreased rates of liver transplantation for HCV and improved early graft survival. As the rates of liver transplant for NASH continue to increase, focus will be needed on the prevention and effective therapies for this disease.

Direct-acting antiviral agents for liver transplant recipients with recurrent genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Comprehensive evaluation of safety and efficacy of different combinations of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) in liver transplant recipients with genotype 1 (GT1) hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence remains limited. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta‐analysis in order to evaluate the clinical outcome of DAA treatment in liver transplant patients with HCV GT1 recurrence.

Methods

Studies were included if they contained information of 12 weeks sustained virologic response (SVR12) after DAA treatment completion as well as treatment related complications for liver transplant recipients with GT1 HCV recurrence.

Results

We identified 16 studies comprising 885 patients. The overall pooled estimate proportion of SVR12 was 93% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89, 0.96), with moderate heterogeneity observed (τ² = 0.01, P < 0.01, I²=75%). High tolerability was observed in liver transplant recipients reflected by serious adverse events (sAEs) with pooled estimate proportion of 4% (95% CI: 0.01, 0.07; τ² = 0.02, P < 0.01, I² = 81%). For subgroup analysis, a total of five different DAA regimens were applied for treating these patients. Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) led the highest pooled estimate SVR12 proportion, followed by Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasivir/Dasabuvir (PrOD), Daclatasvir (DCV)/Simeprevir (SMV) ± Ribavirin (RBV), and SOF/SMV ± RBV, Asunaprevir (ASV)/DCV. There was a tendency for favoring a higher pooled SVR12 proportion in patients with METAVIR Stage F0‐F2 of 97% (95% CI: 0.93, 0.99) compared to 85% (95% CI: 0.79, 0.90) for stage F3‐F4 (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between LT recipients treated with or without RBV (P = 0.23).

Conclusions

Direct‐acting antiviral treatment is highly effective and well‐tolerated in liver transplant recipients with recurrent GT1 HCV infection.

Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation: Donor Evaluation, Recipient Risk, and Outcomes of Transmission

In 2016, the Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand, with the support of the Australian Government Organ and Tissue authority, commissioned a literature review on the topic of infectious disease transmission from deceased donors to recipients of solid organ transplants. The purpose of this review was to synthesize evidence on transmission risks, diagnostic test characteristics, and recipient management to inform best-practice clinical guidelines. The final review, presented as a special supplement in Transplantation Direct, collates case reports of transmission events and other peer-reviewed literature, and summarizes current (as of June 2017) international guidelines on donor screening and recipient management. Of particular interest at the time of writing was how to maximize utilization of donors at increased risk for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, given the recent developments, including the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus and improvements in donor screening technologies. The review also covers emerging risks associated with recent epidemics (eg, Zika virus) and the risk of transmission of nonendemic pathogens related to donor travel history or country of origin. Lastly, the implications for recipient consent of expanded utilization of donors at increased risk of blood-borne viral disease transmission are considered.

Efficacy and safety of partial splenic embolization for hypersplenism in pre- and post-liver transplant patients: A 16-year comparative analysis

PURPOSE

To report the effect of partial splenic embolization (PSE) on hematological indices and the procedure's safety in pre- and post-liver transplant (LT) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study evaluating all patients who underwent PSE over a 16-year period was performed. Inclusion criteria were splenomegaly confirmed by imaging and at least one of the following cytopenias: hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL, WBC count ≤1500 μL^-1, or platelet count ≤100,000 μL^-1. 38 of 102 patients (37%) met criteria (24 pre- and 14 post-LT) for a total of 40 PSEs.

RESULTS

No effect was seen on median hemoglobin beyond 2 weeks post-PSE. There was a significant and sustained increase in median WBC counts (from 3400 μL^-1 to 5400 μL^-1 at 2 years) and platelet count (from 65,000 μL^-1 to 117,000 μL^-1 at 3.5 years). In 6 out of 40 PSEs (15%) a major complication occurred which included pleural effusion, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, pneumonia, and inferior vena cava thrombus. Similar efficacy was observed in pre- and post-LT cohorts, with a trend toward higher complication rate in pre-LT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PSE is efficacious in increasing WBC count out to 2 years and platelet count out to 3.5 years in patients with hypersplenism. Efficacy and safety appeared independent of pre- or post-LT status. The intervention is associated with major complications and special care should be taken when selecting patients for PSE.

Direct-acting antivirals are effective and safe in HCV/HIV-coinfected liver transplant recipients who experience recurrence of hepatitis C: A prospective nationwide cohort study

Direct-acting antivirals have proved to be highly efficacious and safe in monoinfected liver transplant (LT) recipients who experience recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, there is a lack of data on effectiveness and tolerability of these regimens in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients who experience recurrence of HCV infection after LT. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, the outcomes of 47 HCV/HIV-coinfected LT patients who received DAA therapy (with or without ribavirin [RBV]) were compared with those of a matched cohort of 148 HCV-monoinfected LT recipients who received similar treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. HCV/HIV-coinfected patients had a median (IQR) CD4 T-cell count of 366 (256-467) cells/µL. HIV-RNA was <50 copies/mL in 96% of patients. The DAA regimens administered were SOF + LDV ± RBV (34%), SOF + SMV ± RBV (31%), SOF + DCV ± RBV (27%), SMV + DCV ± RBV (5%), and 3D (3%), with no differences between the groups. Treatment was well tolerated in both groups. Rates of SVR (negative serum HCV-RNA at 12 weeks after the end of treatment) were high and similar for coinfected and monoinfected patients (95% and 94%, respectively; P = .239). Albeit not significant, a trend toward lower SVR rates among patients with advanced fibrosis (P = .093) and genotype 4 (P = .088) was observed. In conclusion, interferon-free regimens with DAAs for post-LT recurrence of HCV infection in HIV-infected individuals were highly effective and well tolerated, with results comparable to those of HCV-monoinfected patients.

Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Treatment in Liver or Kidney Transplant Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Well-tolerated, ribavirin-free, pangenotypic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments for transplant recipients remain a high priority. Once-daily glecaprevir/pibrentasvir demonstrates high rates of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR12) across all major HCV genotypes (GTs). This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for patients with chronic HCV GT1-6 infection who had received a liver or kidney transplant. MAGELLAN-2 was a phase 3, open-label trial conducted in patients who were ≥3 months posttransplant. Patients without cirrhosis who were HCV treatment-naive (GT1-6) or treatment-experienced (GT1, 2, 4-6; with interferon-based therapy with or without sofosbuvir, or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin) received glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300/120 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint compared the percentage of patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir with SVR12 to a historic SVR12 rate based on the standard of care. Safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was assessed. In total, 80 liver transplant and 20 kidney transplant patients participated in the trial. Most patients had no or minimal fibrosis (80% had fibrosis scores F0-F1) and were infected with HCV GT1 (57%) or GT3 (24%). The overall SVR12 was 98% (n/N = 98/100; 95% confidence interval, 95.3%-100%), which exceeded the prespecified historic standard-of-care SVR12 threshold of 94%. One patient experienced virologic failure. One patient discontinued because of an adverse event considered to be unrelated to treatment; this patient achieved SVR12. Adverse events were mostly mild in severity, and laboratory abnormalities were infrequent.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 12 weeks is a well-tolerated and efficacious, ribavirin-free treatment for patients with chronic HCV GT1-6 infection who have received a liver or kidney transplant. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02692703.) (Hepatology 2018; 00:000-000).

Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Regarding Renal Function in Post-Liver Transplant Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus and a 100% 12-Week Sustained Virologic Response-A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Patients after liver transplantation (LT) with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection often suffer from renal or hepatic impairment. Treating patients after LT with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) might result in decreasing renal function due to interaction of DAA and immunosuppressive therapy. In this single-center study we analyzed clinical parameters of 18 HCV-infected patients treated with DAA therapy after LT.

METHODS

The primary end points were change of renal function (glomerular filtration rate) and sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12). For secondary end points, we investigated the influence of DAA therapy on transaminases, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, noninvasive fibrosis measurement, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score.

RESULTS

Five out of 18 patients treated with DAA suffered from renal impairment stage 2, and 7 patients of renal impairment stage 3. Renal function at SVR12 was not influenced by preexisting renal impairment (P > .5), type of immunosuppressant (P > .5), or type of DAA regimen (P > .5). All patients reached SVR12. The levels of transaminases and bilirubin declined rapidly, as expected. Ten out of 18 patients already suffered from cirrhosis or liver fibrosis >F3 according to noninvasive measurement before initiation of treatment. Single-point acoustic radiation force impulse imaging improved in 9 patients (P = .012). In 7 patients, MELD score improved owing to the decrease of bilirubin levels. In 6 patients it worsened.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA therapy in LT patients was effective and safe in this single-center real-life cohort. Renal function was not influenced by the administered drug combinations, even in patients with preexisting renal impairment.

Use of direct antiviral agents in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus in Korea: 2-center experience

Purpose

The proportion of liver recipients with HCV is gradually increasing in Korea. Limited data are available regarding the efficacy of direct antiviral agents (DAAs) in liver transplant recipients in Asia. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of DAAs in HCV-infected liver recipients in Korea.

Methods

Forty HCV-infected patients from 2 centers received DAAs in the pretransplant or posttransplant period between May 2015 and November 2016.

Results

DAA was administered in the pretransplant period in 6 patients and the posttransplant period in 34 patients. Dalastavir and asunaprevir (n = 2) and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and ribvarin (n = 4) were used in the pretransplant period. HCV RNA was not detected before liver transplantation in all patients. Sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 and 24 weeks after liver transplantation was 100%. In the posttransplant period, 33 of 34 patients received sofosfovir-based therapy. SVR at 12 weeks in those patients was 94%. Recurrent virologic relapse developed in 2 patients because of HCC recurrence or treatment failure. Adverse events included anemia (n = 2) and abdominal discomfort (n = 1).

Conclusion

DAAs are an effective and well-tolerated treatment for HCV-infected recipients in Korea.

Pre-emptive Treatment of HCV after Living Donor Liver Transplantation with Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) universally recurs after liver transplantation (LT). Although the introduction of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has revolutionized the treatment of HCV infection, no optimal treatment for HCV recurrence after LT has been developed.

METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of DAAs as a pre-emptive treatment for recurrent HCV infection after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). From January 2010 to December 2016, 70 patients received pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and 35 patients were treated with DAA-based regimens to treat recurrent HCV after LDLT. All antiviral treatments were pre-emptive.

RESULTS

Genotype 1b was the most common HCV type (61.9%). Twenty-two recipients in the DAA group were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, nine received daclatasvir plus asunaprevir, three received sofosbuvir, and one received sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir. All 35 patients (100%) in the DAA group achieved a sustained virologic response (SVR), a percentage significantly higher than that (71.4%) in the PegIFN group (p < 0.001). In the PegIFN group, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 85.7, 73.9, and 70.7%, respectively, whereas those in the DAA group were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

DAA-based regimens are an effective treatment for HCV recurrence after LDLT, resulting in an improved SVR and better graft survival than PegIFN.

Hepatitis C Virus Eradication with New Interferon-Free Treatment Improves Metabolic Profile in Hepatitis C Virus-Related Liver Transplant Recipients

Interferon (IFN)-free, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy agents provide a safe and efficacious treatment for liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of HCV eradication on the metabolic factors in liver transplant recipients. We completed a retrospective single-center study on HCV-related liver transplant recipients treated with IFN-free DAAs including both treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. IFN-free DAAs impact on the metabolic profile were assessed at baseline and sustained virological response (SVR) between 24 and 48 weeks. In total, 91 liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection received IFN-free DAA treatment, 62 patients had IFN-based treatment failure, and 29 were treatment-naïve, of whom 87 (96%) achieved SVR. Eradication of recurrent HCV infection was associated with reduction in the treatment of diabetes and hypertension by 38% and 22% from the baseline respectively. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels declined from mean 35.5 ± 4.3 mmol/mol to 33.3 ±3.6 mmol/mol at 44 weeks posttreatment (P = 0.03). Total cholesterol levels increased from 3.8 ± 0.9 mmol/L to 4.9 ± 0.9 mmol/L at 41 weeks posttreatment (P < 0.0001), reflecting a significant increase in serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (2.0 ± 0.8 to 2.9 ± 0.8; P < 0.0001). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels increased from 64.9 ± 20 mL/minute to 69.6 ± 20 mL/minute at 24 weeks posttreatment (P = 0.0004). Glucose, lipid profile, and eGFR changes were independent of weight changes and immunosuppression dosage and trough levels. In conclusion, eradication of recurrent HCV infection by DAA therapy has beneficial impacts on glucose metabolism and renal profile and reverses the hypolipidemic effect of HCV in liver transplant recipients. These extrahepatic effects of DAA therapy need to be validated by larger prospective studies.

Outcomes of antiviral treatment in hepatitis C virus liver transplant patients off immunosuppression in the direct acting antivirals era: A case series

BACKGROUND

Clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) under antiviral therapy, including direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), has been associated with higher risk of rejection. Whether patients who are not on immunosuppression (IS) during DAA therapy are at higher risk of rejection is unknown.

METHODS

Four transplant recipients who were off IS and treated with DAA therapy were identified.

RESULTS

All patients were genotype 1 infection and treated for 12 weeks with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin. At the time of DAA therapy, patients were off IS for a median of 9.5 years. Time from liver transplant (LT) to treatment was 12.9 years. Median baseline ALT was 70 IU/L, at follow-up week 12 was 18 IU/L. No signs of rejection were observed during DAA therapy or follow-up after the end of therapy. All 4 patients obtained sustained virological response.

CONCLUSION

Direct-acting antivirals therapy in HCV patients off IS post-LT can be successfully undertaken without the need to restart IS.

Transplanting hepatitis C virus-positive livers into hepatitis C virus-negative patients with preemptive antiviral treatment: A modeling study

Under current guidelines, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive livers are not transplanted into HCV-negative recipients because of adverse posttransplant outcomes associated with allograft HCV infection. However, HCV can now be cured post-LT (liver transplant) using direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with >90% success; therefore, HCV-negative patients on the LT waiting list may benefit from accepting HCV-positive organs with preemptive treatment. Our objective was to evaluate whether and in which HCV-negative patients the potential benefit of accepting an HCV-positive (i.e., viremic) organ outweighed the risks associated with HCV allograft infection. We developed a Markov-based mathematical model that simulated a virtual trial of HCV-negative patients on the LT waiting list to compare long-term outcomes in patients: (1) willing to accept any (HCV-negative or HCV-positive) liver versus (2) those willing to accept only HCV-negative livers. Patients receiving HCV-positive livers were treated preemptively with 12 weeks of DAA therapy and had a higher risk of graft failure than those receiving HCV-negative livers. The model incorporated data from published studies and the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). We found that accepting any liver regardless of HCV status versus accepting only HCV-negative livers resulted in an increase in life expectancy when Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was ≥20, and the benefit was highest at MELD 28 (0.172 additional life-years). The magnitude of clinical benefit was greater in UNOS regions with higher HCV-positive donor organ rates, that is, Regions 1, 2, 3, 10, and 11. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that model outcomes were robust.

CONCLUSION

Transplanting HCV-positive livers into HCV-negative patients with preemptive DAA therapy could improve patient survival on the LT waiting list. Our analysis can help inform clinical trials and minimize patient harm. (Hepatology 2018;67:2085-2095).

Efficacy And Safety of Sofosbuvir Based Regimens For Treatment of Hepatitis C Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Experience From India

INTRODUCTION

Results of Sofosbuvir based regimens for hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation are available from well-designed clinical trials. Most of the data is from deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) setting, and data on "real world" experience for HCV recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is limited.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive 78 patients who completed Sofosbuvir based HCV treatment after liver transplantation were included. Following Sofosbuvir based regimens were used; Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin (n = 58), Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 5), Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 15). Treatment was given for 12 weeks (triple therapy) or 24 weeks (dual therapy).

RESULTS

A total of 74/78 (94.8%) patients achieved end of treatment response (ETR) while 4 did not achieve ETR. A total of 68/76 (89.4%) patients achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12). while 2 are waiting for 12 weeks follow up after ETR. Twelve patients had history of failed previous treatment with Peginterferon and Ribavirin after LDLT, all these patients achieved ETR and 11/12 had SVR12. There was no statistical difference in response rates between genotype 1 or 3. Eighteen patients (16 on Ribavirin) had hemoglobin < 8 g/dl; two patients complained fatigue in absence of anemia.

CONCLUSION

Sofosbuvir based regimens are safe and highly effective in treatment of HCV recurrence after LDLT.

The Mexican consensus on the treatment of hepatitis C

The aim of the Mexican Consensus on the Treatment of HepatitisC was to develop clinical practice guidelines applicable to Mexico. The expert opinion of specialists in the following areas was taken into account: gastroenterology, infectious diseases, and hepatology. A search of the medical literature was carried out on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases through keywords related to hepatitisC treatment. The quality of evidence was subsequently evaluated using the GRADE system and the consensus statements were formulated. The statements were then voted upon, using the modified Delphi system, and reviewed and corrected by a panel of 34 voting participants. Finally, the level of agreement was classified for each statement. The present guidelines provide recommendations with an emphasis on the new direct-acting antivirals, to facilitate their use in clinical practice. Each case must be individualized according to the comorbidities involved and patient management must always be multidisciplinary.

Fibrosing Cholestatic Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation: Therapeutic Options Before and After Introduction of Direct-Acting Antivirals: Our Experience and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation. The most aggressive form of hepatitis C virus (HCV) relapse after liver transplantation is fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis C, which can be observed in 2% to 15% of recipients.

METHODS

Double therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin was characterized by low antiviral response, rapid fibrosis, and frequent graft failure within 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Introduction of direct-acting antivirals for HCV treatment allows for more efficient therapy with less adverse reactions, including patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis C.

CONCLUSIONS

We present 4 (2.5%) cases of cholestatic viral hepatitis C recurrence in patients undergoing transplantation between 2006 and 2015 at the Transplantation Institute of Warsaw; during this period, 158 liver transplants were performed in patients with cirrhosis caused by HCV infection.

The Italian compassionate use of sofosbuvir observational cohort study for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C: clinical and virological outcomes

Direct antivirals are available for treating recurrent hepatitis C (RHC). This study reported outcomes of 424 patients with METAVIR F3-F4 RHC who were treated for 24 weeks with sofosbuvir/ribavirin and followed for 12 weeks within the Italian sofosbuvir compassionate use program. In 55 patients, daclatasvir or simeprevir were added. Child-Pugh class and model of end stage liver disease (MELD) scores were evaluated at baseline and 36 weeks after the start of therapy. The sustained viral response (SVR) was 86.7% (316/365) in patients who received sofosbuvir/ribavirin and 98.3% (58/59) in patients who received a second antiviral (P < 0.01). In patients treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin, a significant difference in SVR was observed between patients diagnosed with METAVIR F4 (211/250; 84.4%), METAVIR F3 (95/105; 90.5%) and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (10/10; 100%) (P = 0.049). A significant association was found between patients who worsened from Child-Pugh class A and who experienced viral relapse (4/26 vs. 8/189, P = 0.02). In patients with a baseline MELD score <15, a significant association was found between maintaining a final MELD score <15 and the achievement of SVR (187/219 vs. 6/10, P = 0.031). This real-world study indicates that sofosbuvir/ribavirin treatment for 24 weeks was effective, and the achievement of SVR was associated with a reduced probability of developing worsening liver function.

Disease Reversibility in Patients With Post-Hepatitis C Cirrhosis: Is the Point of No Return the Same Before and After Liver Transplantation? A Review

Liver fibrosis can regress in patients with chronic hepatitis in whom the underlying cause of liver damage is adequately treated. Studies documenting this benefit have been mostly performed in the setting of viral hepatitis, particularly hepatitis C virus, where sustained viral response has been unequivocally shown to result in histological and clinical improvement. With the advent of the new IFN-free regimens, highly effective and safe even in those historically considered "difficult to treat and cure patients," additional benefits have been documented in patients treated at advanced stages of disease, including improvement in liver function with hepatic "recompensation," reduction of portal hypertension, and eventually avoidance of liver transplantation. Disease reversibility has been also demonstrated in the posttransplant setting and appears to be similar to what is observed in the nontransplant patient.

Outcomes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in liver transplant recipients with allograft failure

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) carries appreciable morbidity and mortality in the pre-liver transplant (LT) setting. However, the occurrence of SBP and its consequences in the post-LT setting have not been well characterized.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of SBP occurring in post-LT patients between January 2007 and December 2012. Outcomes were compared to a cohort of post-LT patients with allograft failure and ascites without SBP.

RESULTS

The most common indication for liver transplantation in this cohort was hepatitis C. A total of 29 episodes of SBP in 21 patients were identified. Escherichia coli (19%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%) were the most frequent pathogens identified. Six patients died during their first episode of SBP. Ten patients were eventually listed for liver re-transplantation (re-LT) after their first episode of SBP; 5 of these patients were transplanted and the other 5 died. Of the 5 who were transplanted, 2 died shortly after re-transplant, and 3 are still alive. The cause of death in the majority of patients was infection (83.3%). The median time from onset of ascites to death was 214 days (range: 10-1085 days) and from the first episode of SBP to death was 50.5 days (range: 4-549 days). In contrast, the median time from onset of ascites to death in patients with allograft failure and ascites without SBP was 331.5 days (45-2400 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Allograft failure with ascites is a poor prognostic factor and these patients should be considered high risk for re-LT. SBP may accelerate the time to mortality.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral therapy in previous hard-to-treat patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation: a real-world cohort

Background

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) has been a frequent and relevant problem in the past two decades. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of new interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies in a large real-world cohort of HCV patients after LT.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 157 patients infected with HCV who underwent deceased donor LT between 1997 and 2014. Patient survival, outcome, and side effects of antiviral therapy were assessed.

Results

Survival with recurrent HCV genotype 1 (GT1) infection was inferior to other HCV GTs (P=0.01). The overall sustained virological response (SVR) rate with new DAA therapy was 94.6% (n=37). Patients with both GT1 and other GTs reached SVR rates >90%. We noticed a few side effects, mainly caused by ribavirin, and only one discontinuation in DAA-treated patients.

Conclusion

DAA therapy was effective and safe in previous hard-to-treat patients after LT in this real-world cohort.

Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir with ribavirin for treatment of recurrent chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection after liver transplantation: Real-world experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The registered trial has demonstrated that paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir plus dasabuvir (PrOD) with ribavirin was effective for recurrent hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) infection after liver transplantation in patients with mild fibrosis; however, the real-world efficacy and safety of this regimen have not been determined.

METHODS

The efficacy (sustained virological response, SVR12, undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks post-treatment) and safety were evaluated in 12 patients with recurrent HCV-1 infection after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Nine patients were treated for 24 weeks, and three patients (two treatment-naïve patients and one interferon-intolerant patient) were treated for 12 weeks. HCV RNA was undetectable at treatment day 1, week 1, week 4, week 12, and at the end of treatment in 8.3% (n = 1), 25% (n = 3), 83.3% (n = 10), 100% (n = 12), and 100% (n = 12) of patients, respectively. All twelve patients achieved SVR12. Treatment was temporarily stopped in one patient because of leucopenia. The other patient with minimal fibrosis experienced an elevation in alanine aminotransferase concentration, which returned to normal levels after dose reduction. Seven (58.3%) patients required RBV dose reduction and two (16.7%) required transient RBV discontinuation during treatment. There were no serious adverse events, and most adverse events were related to ribavirin. No patient developed graft rejection or deterioration in hepatic or renal function during treatment. Treatment efficacy and safety were comparable between patients with and without advanced liver fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

PrOD plus ribavirin had a highly satisfactory real-world efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of recurrent HCV-1 infection after liver transplantation in Asian patients.

Treatment of HCV infection in liver transplant recipients with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir without ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir is a well-tolerated regimen with high sustained virological response (SVR) rates in pre-liver transplant patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), but data in liver transplant recipients outside of clinical trials is limited.

AIM

To address this knowledge gap and assess SVR rates without the use of ribavirin in liver transplant recipients METHODS: This is a retrospective study examining the treatment of 75 post-liver transplant recipients with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir without ribavirin. Differences between SVR cohorts and predictors of SVR were analysed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) fashion.

RESULTS

A total of 408 genotype 1, HCV patients were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir from October 2014 to August 2015 at our centre. Seventy-three patients were post-liver transplant and were treated with a median of 2.9 years from transplant. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir achieved an SVR12 of 95.9%. African Americans made up 28.8% of the cohort. Sixty-three per cent of patients were treated previously, including 13.7% of patients previously treated with direct-acting antivirals. Only 2.7% had recurrent allograft cirrhosis, and the majority (90.4%) was on calcineurin inhibitor based immunosuppressive therapy. Approximately 82% of patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2 or 3. In univariate logistic regression, only detectable week 8 viral load was predictive of failure to achieve SVR.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm excellent SVR outcomes and favourable safety and tolerability profiles with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin in post-liver transplant recipients infected with HCV, despite treatment guidelines to use ribavirin.

The New Era of Hepatitis C: Therapy in Liver Transplant Recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of end-stage liver disease in both Europe and the United States and is the most common reason for liver transplant. In the absence of antiviral therapy, recurrent infection is the norm with subsequent graft hepatitis and impaired survival. Whether it may be better to postpone therapy in patients in whom higher risk of failure and toxicity is coupled with lower chance of liver function improvement likely depends on several factors, including waiting time, center allocation policy, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma and local prevalence of anti-HCV-positive donors.

Sofosbuvir-based regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in severe renal dysfunction

Sofosbuvir (SOF) is a nonstructural 5B polymerase inhibitor with activity in all hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and is the backbone of many anti-HCV drug regimens. SOF is converted into inactive metabolites that undergo renal excretion. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m² may experience increased drug exposure and thus potential toxicities along with decreased efficacy due to dose reduction or drug discontinuation. This is a single-center study evaluating safety and effectiveness of SOF-based regimens in patients with severe renal dysfunction, defined as eGFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m², including those receiving concurrent hemodialysis. Data were collected from patients with HCV and severe renal dysfunction who started full-dose (400 mg) SOF-based antiviral therapy ± ribavirin between April 2014 and February 2016. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical history, laboratory, radiologic imaging, echocardiography, transplant status, and liver pathologic findings. Twenty-nine patients were identified; 12 had cirrhosis and 4 of those had decompensated cirrhosis. Fourteen patients had undergone transplantation of liver and/or kidney and were on calcineurin inhibitors, with 42% requiring dose increases or decreases while on therapy. All patients attained viral suppression on treatment, and 97% had a sustained viral response at 12 weeks posttreatment. There were no early treatment discontinuations. One death occurred posttreatment from a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in a patient with a history of coronary artery disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Conclusion: SOF-based regimens appear safe in a broad range of patients with severe renal dysfunction, including those with decompensated cirrhosis and liver transplant. To confirm these retrospective findings, prospective studies that include SOF and SOF metabolite measurements coupled with prospective serial monitoring of electrocardiograms and echocardiograms are needed. (Hepatology Communications 2017;1:248-255).

Efficacy and Safety of Therapy With Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir in Liver Transplant Recipients Infected by Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4: Cohort Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation Cohort

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 infection are poorly represented in clinical trials of 2nd-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), and more data are needed to help guide treatment decisions. We still have even fewer data concerning liver transplant patients. Simeprevir (SIM) and sofosbuvir (SOF) combination is useful to treat this genotype. The aim of this study was to know the efficacy and safety of the combination SIM + SOF ± ribavirin (RBV) in a group of liver transplant patients with HCV genotype 4 infection in Spain in real life.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective study, including 28 HCV genotype 4 patients from 11 liver transplant centers who were treated with SIM + SOF ± RBV. We included in the analysis demographic, clinical, and virologic data and details of serious adverse events (SAEs), including mortality rate 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

All patients were male, mean age 52 ± 9.43 years, and 50% were IL28B CT and 37.5% TT; 46.42% of them were pretreated and 76.9 were null responders. Fibrosis stage 4 was found in 38.7% of patients; in 67.8% of those cases the diagnosis of fibrosis was made with the use of Fibroscan, in 21.4% by liver biopsy. The average Fibroscan was 13.86 KPa. The average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of cirrhotic patients was 10.9 and the Child-Pugh score was A in 70%, B in 20%, and C in 10%. We included RBV in 75% of patients, and treatment duration was 12 weeks in all patients. The sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) was 95.23%. There were no discontinuations due to SAEs, but the mortality rate at 6 months after treatment was 7.14%. All deceased patients were cirrhotic, Child C, and with an average MELD score of 20.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination SIM + SOF ± RBV to treat HCV genotype 4 in liver transplant patients is an option with high rates of SVR12 and very safe, similarly to genotype 1. There was no treatment-related mortality, but when it is administered in advanced stages of fibrosis it may not be enough to prevent mortality associated with cirrhotic hepatitis C recurrence after transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based interferon-free therapies for hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based interferon-free therapies in liver transplantation recipients with hepatitis C virus infection recurrence.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CENTRAL on the Cochrane Library without time or language limitation. The search strategy used was "sofosbuvir AND transplantation." Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) rate, incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and/or adverse events, discontinuation rate with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (1730 patients) were included for our meta-analysis. The pooled SVR12 rate was 90.1% (95% CI 86.4-93.4%, I²  = 81.6%). SVR12 rate was higher in patients with mild fibrosis than in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis (RR = 1.072, 95% CI 1.031-1.115, I²  = 3.6%). For patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1, the pooled SVR12 rate was 91.9% (95% CI 89.2-94.2%, I²  = 53.3%). The pooled SAEs incidence was 8.3% (95% CI 5.6-11.5%, I²  = 78.4%). The pooled discontinuation rate because of adverse events or SAEs was 3.3% (95% CI 1.8-5.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sofosbuvir-based interferon-free therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment strategy for patients with hepatitis C virus infection recurrence after liver transplantation.

Interferon-free antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C among patients in the liver transplant setting

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection remains a major public health problem with many infected individuals worldwide. The revolutionary discovery of highly effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) makes chronic HCV infection a curable disease, even in patients with advanced liver disease. Liver function may improve shortly after initiation of antiviral therapy in patients on the waiting list and could even obviate the need for transplantation. However, whether these short term benefits also result in a favorable prognosis on the long-term remains to be seen and this fuels the discussion whether DAAs should be used prior to liver transplantation in all patients. Following liver transplantation, DAA treatment is also highly effective so that postponing antiviral treatment to the post-transplant setting may be better for certain patients. Furthermore, the discussion whether HCV positive organ donors should be used now viral eradication is achieved in almost all patients has regained interest.

Hepatitis C virus infection

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a hepatotropic RNA virus that causes progressive liver damage, which might result in liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Globally, between 64 and 103 million people are chronically infected. Major risk factors for this blood-borne virus infection are unsafe injection drug use and unsterile medical procedures (iatrogenic infections) in countries with high HCV prevalence. Diagnostic procedures include serum HCV antibody testing, HCV RNA measurement, viral genotype and subtype determination and, lately, assessment of resistance-associated substitutions. Various direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have become available, which target three proteins involved in crucial steps of the HCV life cycle: the NS3/4A protease, the NS5A protein and the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase NS5B protein. Combination of two or three of these DAAs can cure (defined as a sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment) HCV infection in >90% of patients, including populations that have been difficult to treat in the past. As long as a prophylactic vaccine is not available, the HCV pandemic has to be controlled by treatment-as-prevention strategies, effective screening programmes and global access to treatment.

Three patients treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

We previously reported results of interferon (IFN)-free daclatasvir and asunaprevir for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection after liver transplantation (LT). Here we report three patients who achieved viral response with no effect on the blood concentrations of immunosuppressive agents following sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir treatment. The first patient was a 68-year-old female with HCV-related liver cirrhosis who failed to respond to pegylated-IFN and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) after living donor LT. She had been treated with 50 mg/day of cyclosporine. The second was a 63-year-old male with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma who failed to respond to PEG-IFN/RBV after living donor LT. He had been treated with 50 mg/day of cyclosporine. The third was a 63-year-old female with HCV-related liver cirrhosis. She had been treated with tacrolimus. High alanine aminotransferase levels persisted after LT. Liver biopsy examination revealed active hepatitis or chronic rejection. Therefore, sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir therapy was started. However, the combination treatment was stopped at 4 weeks due to development of interstitial pneumonia. Serum HCV RNA became negative at the time treatment was discontinued and remained negative 12 weeks after cessation of therapy in all three cases. Sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir treatment showed a remarkable viral response with little effect on blood levels of immunosuppressive agents for recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection after LT.

Changes in Utilization and Discard of Hepatitis C-Infected Donor Livers in the Recent Era

The impact of interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments on utilization and outcomes associated with HCV-positive deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is largely unknown. Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 25 566 HCV-positive DDLT recipients from 2005 to 2015 and compared practices according to the introduction of DAA therapies using modified Poisson regression. The proportion of HCV-positive recipients who received HCV-positive livers increased from 6.9% in 2010 to 16.9% in 2015. HCV-positive recipients were 61% more likely to receive an HCV-positive liver after 2010 (early DAA/IFN era) (aRR:_1.45 1.61_1.79 , p < 0.001) and almost three times more likely to receive one after 2013 (IFN-free DAA era) (aRR:_2.58 2.85_3.16 , p < 0.001). Compared to HCV-negative livers, HCV-positive livers were 3 times more likely to be discarded from 2005 to 2010 (aRR:_2.69 2.99_3.34 , p < 0.001), 2.2 times more likely after 2010 (aRR:_1.80 2.16_2.58 , p < 0.001) and 1.7 times more likely after 2013 (aRR:_1.37 1.68_2.04 , p < 0.001). Donor HCV status was not associated with increased risk of all-cause graft loss (p = 0.1), and this did not change over time (p = 0.8). Use of HCV-positive livers has increased dramatically, coinciding with the advent of DAAs. However, the discard rate remains nearly double that of HCV-negative livers. Further optimization of HCV-positive liver utilization is necessary to improve access for all candidates.

[Renewed 2015 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Hepatitis C by Korean Association for the Study of the Liver; What Has Been Changed? - Indications for Treatment]

The landscape of treatment for HCV infection has evolved substantially with the advent of highly effective direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA). The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver updated guideline for managemnt of hepatitis C in accordance with the introduction of DAA into practice in late 2015. Due to high effectiveness and few side effects of DAA, indications for treatment has been widened to include patients who had been contraindicated for the combination treatment of peginterferon-α and ribavirin, i.e. decompensated cirrhosis and pre- and post-liver transplant setting. As succeesul treatment of HCV can reduce complications of cirrhosis, development of hepatocelluar carcinoma and liver-related mortality, and improve extrahepatic manifestions, all HCV-infected patients with no contraindication should be considered for treatment. Considering the risk for morbidity and mortality and benefit of treatment, patients with advanced fibrosis ≥F3 including compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, those in the pre- and post-tranplasnt setting, and those with severe extrahepatic manifestations including HCV-related mixed cryoglobulinemia and glomerulonephritis should be given priority for treatment.