1
|
Aiza-Haddad I, Ballesteros-Amozurrutia A, Borjas-Almaguer OD, Castillo-Barradas M, Castro-Narro G, Chávez-Tapia N, Chirino-Sprung RA, Cisneros-Garza L, Dehesa-Violante M, Flores-Calderón J, Flores-Gaxiola A, García-Juárez I, González-Huezo MS, González-Moreno EI, Higuera-de la Tijera F, Kershenobich-Stalnikowitz D, López-Méndez E, Malé-Velázquez R, Marín-López E, Mata-Marín JA, Méndez-Sánchez N, Monreal-Robles R, Moreno-Alcántar R, Muñoz-Espinosa L, Navarro-Alvarez S, Pavia-Ruz N, Pérez-Ríos AM, Poo-Ramírez JL, Rizo-Robles MT, Sánchez-Ávila JF, Sandoval-Salas R, Torre A, Torres-Ibarra R, Trejo-Estrada R, Velarde-Ruiz Velasco JA, Wolpert-Barraza E, Bosques-Padilla F. The Mexican consensus on the treatment of hepatitis C. Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) 2018; 83:275-324. [PMID: 29803325 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the Mexican Consensus on the Treatment of HepatitisC was to develop clinical practice guidelines applicable to Mexico. The expert opinion of specialists in the following areas was taken into account: gastroenterology, infectious diseases, and hepatology. A search of the medical literature was carried out on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases through keywords related to hepatitisC treatment. The quality of evidence was subsequently evaluated using the GRADE system and the consensus statements were formulated. The statements were then voted upon, using the modified Delphi system, and reviewed and corrected by a panel of 34 voting participants. Finally, the level of agreement was classified for each statement. The present guidelines provide recommendations with an emphasis on the new direct-acting antivirals, to facilitate their use in clinical practice. Each case must be individualized according to the comorbidities involved and patient management must always be multidisciplinary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - O D Borjas-Almaguer
- Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | | | - G Castro-Narro
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | | | - L Cisneros-Garza
- Centro de Enfermedades Hepáticas del Hospital San José, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | | | - J Flores-Calderón
- Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - I García-Juárez
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - E I González-Moreno
- Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | | | | | - E López-Méndez
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Ciudad de México, México
| | - R Malé-Velázquez
- Instituto de Salud Digestiva y Hepática, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | | | - J A Mata-Marín
- Hospital de Infectología del Centro Médico Nacional «La Raza», Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - R Monreal-Robles
- Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | | | - L Muñoz-Espinosa
- Hospital Universitario «Dr. José Eleuterio González», Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | | | - N Pavia-Ruz
- Hospital Infantil de México «Federico Gómez», Ciudad de México, México
| | - A M Pérez-Ríos
- Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
| | - J L Poo-Ramírez
- Clínica San Jerónimo de Salud Hepática y Digestiva, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - J F Sánchez-Ávila
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | - A Torre
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Andrade-Villanueva J, Flores-Gaxiola A, Lopez-Guillen P, Aguirre-Avalos G, Morfin-Otero R, Rodriguez-Noriega E. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: results from a multicenter study. Am J Med 1992; 92:71S-74S. [PMID: 1316074 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90313-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Lomefloxacin, a new difluorinated quinolone, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) were compared in the treatment of adults with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The study was conducted as a multicenter, controlled, prospectively randomized, single-blind study in five countries (Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela). A total of 254 patients were enrolled: 129 in the lomefloxacin group and 125 in the TMP/SMX group. Patients received either 400 mg lomefloxacin orally once daily or 160 mg/800 mg TMP/SMX orally twice daily for 7-10 days. Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis were the pathogens most frequently isolated. At 5-9 days post-therapy, satisfactory bacteriologic results were noted in 98.4% of patients treated with lomefloxacin and in 95.8% of patients in the TMP/SMX group (p = 0.2153). Clinical success 5-9 days post-therapy was noted in 99.2% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and in 98.3% of patients in the TMP/SMX group (p = 0.5138). Adverse events probably related to treatment occurred in 6% of those treated with lomefloxacin and in 7% of patients treated with TMP/SMX. Once-daily oral lomefloxacin is a well-tolerated and effective treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by susceptible pathogens.
Collapse
|