1
|
Urquijo-Ponce JJ, Alventosa-Mateu C, Latorre-Sánchez M, Castelló-Miralles I, Diago M. Present and future of new systemic therapies for early and intermediate stages of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:2512-2522. [PMID: 38817666 PMCID: PMC11135412 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i19.2512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a high mortality neoplasm which usually appears on a cirrhotic liver. The therapeutic arsenal and subsequent prognostic outlook are intrinsically linked to the HCC stage at diagnosis. Notwithstanding the current deployment of treatments with curative intent (liver resection/local ablation and liver transplantation) in early and intermediate stages, a high rate of HCC recurrence persists, underscoring a pivotal clinical challenge. Emergent systemic therapies (ST), particularly immunotherapy, have demonstrate promising outcomes in terms of increase overall survival, but they are currently bound to the advanced stage of HCC. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature, encompassing studies up to March 10, 2024, evaluating the impact of novel ST in the early and intermediate HCC stages, specially focusing on the findings of neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, aimed at increasing significantly overall survival and recurrence-free survival after a treatment with curative intent. We also investigate the potential role of ST in enhancing the downstaging rate for the intermediate-stage HCC initially deemed ineligible for treatment with curative intent. Finally, we critically discuss about the current relevance of the results of these studies and the encouraging future implications of ST in the treatment schedules of early and intermediate HCC stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Jose Urquijo-Ponce
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Carlos Alventosa-Mateu
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Mercedes Latorre-Sánchez
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Castelló-Miralles
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Moisés Diago
- Hepatology Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Makary MS, Bozer J, Miller ED, Diaz DA, Rikabi A. Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 5-Year Institutional Experience. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:1828-1835. [PMID: 37537129 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To examine the clinical outcomes of yttrium-90 (Y90) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through the evaluation of a 5-year institutional experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study evaluated 88 consecutive patients with primary HCC receiving Y90 TARE treatment at an academic medical center from 2017 to 2021. Disease distribution was bilobar in 60.2% of patients with an average lesion diameter of 5.0 ± 3.4 cm and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C in 77% of the participants. Clinical outcomes were elucidated by examination of complications, liver function tests, biochemical response, and radiographic response. Objective response ratio (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were also calculated. RESULTS The mean administered Y90 radiation dose was 127.8 ± 20.2 Gy. No significant complications or LFT elevations occurred post-therapy. Of the 73.9% of patients with α-fetoprotein-producing tumors, 67.8% experienced a complete or partial biochemical response 1 month post-treatment. The ORR was 83.3% on 6-month imaging and PFS was 9.6 ± 8.5 months. Functional outcomes (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) were maintained or improved in 79.6% and 76.1% of patients by 6 months and 1 year post-treatment, respectively. The mean survival was 14.7 ± 12.1 months. At 6 months post-treatment, 77.3% of patients were downstaged to or maintained Milan criteria, which was sustained for 74.4% and 70.0% of patients 1 year and 2 years after treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION Y90-TARE is a safe and effective therapy for primary HCC. Enduring outcomes further act as a realistic bridge to liver transplantation, with a majority of patients maintaining Milan criteria and preserving their functional status long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina S Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Avenue, 4th Floor, Columbus, OH 43210 (M.S.M., J.B., A.R.).
| | - Jordan Bozer
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Avenue, 4th Floor, Columbus, OH 43210 (M.S.M., J.B., A.R.)
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (E.D.M., D.A.D.)
| | - Dayssy A Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (E.D.M., D.A.D.)
| | - Ali Rikabi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Avenue, 4th Floor, Columbus, OH 43210 (M.S.M., J.B., A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lim WX, Sim KS, Chen CL, Ou HY, Yu CY, Cheng YF. Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Effectiveness of Different Particle Sizes in Downstaging and Bridging in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:596-601. [PMID: 38472083 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.01.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
AIM To compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with different particle sizes in bridging and downstaging in pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Assess the recurrent and survival rates after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS Retrospective review of 580 patients who underwent TACE using DEB from August 2012 to June 2020 at Taiwan Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Pre- and post-TACE computed tomography scan images of the liver were reviewed, and treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Patients were divided by who met the criteria (n = 342) or beyond (n = 238) the University of California San Francisco criteria for successful bridging and downstaging rate evaluation. Each group was divided into subgroups according to DEB particle sizes (group A: <100μm, group B: 100-300 μm, group C: 300-500 μm, and group D: 500-700 μm) to compare objective response rate and post-LDLT survival rate. RESULTS Overall successful bridging and downstaging rate is 97.1% and 58.4%, respectively, in the group of patients who meet the criteria (n = 332) and are beyond (n = 139) the University of California San Francisco criteria. Group B (100-300 μm) had a higher successful bridging rate (99.5%, P = .003) and downstaging rate (63.8%, P = .443). This subgroup also demonstrated a higher objective response rate in single (93.2%, P = .038) tumors, multiple (83.3%, P = .001) tumors, and tumors with size less than 5 cm (93.9%, P = .005). There are no significant differences in post-LDLT overall survival rate between different particle sizes. CONCLUSION TACE with 100 to 300 μm DEB particles is associated with a better chance of bridging and downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma patients to LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Xiong Lim
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuan Siong Sim
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Long Chen
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-You Ou
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yen Yu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Fan Cheng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mosenthal M, Adams W, Cotler S, Ding X, Borge M, Malamis A, Lee D, Thomas T, Jawahar A, Amin P, Molvar C. Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma prior to Liver Transplant: Comparative Pathologic Necrosis, Radiologic Response, and Recurrence. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:506-514. [PMID: 38123127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare pathologic tumor necrosis rates after locoregional therapies (LRTs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior to liver transplantation and evaluate radiologic-pathologic correlation along with posttransplant HCC recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with solitary HCC bridged or downstaged with LRT from 2010 to 2022 were included. LRTs were transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radioembolization (yttrium-90 [90Y]), ablation, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Upfront combination therapy options were TACE/ablation and TACE/SBRT. Subsequent therapy crossover due to local recurrence was allowed. Posttreatment imaging closest to the time of transplant, explant histopathologic necrosis, and tumor recurrence after transplant were reviewed. RESULTS Seventy-three patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 5 (7%) required downstaging. 90Y alone (n = 36) and multimodal therapy (pooled upfront combination and crossover therapy, n = 23) resulted in significantly greater pathologic necrosis compared with TACE alone (n = 14; P = .01). High dose 90Y radiation segmentectomy (≥190 Gy; n = 27) and TACE/ablation (n = 7) showed highest rates of complete pathologic necrosis (CPN)-63% (n = 17) and 71% (n = 5), respectively. Patients with CPN had a mean lesion size of 2.5 cm, compared with 3.2 cm without CPN (P = .04), irrespective of LRT modality. HCC recurrence was more common in patients without CPN (16%, 6/37) than in those with CPN (3%, 1/36; P = .11). Using Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), a nonviable imaging response was 75% sensitive and 57% specific for CPN. CONCLUSIONS Radiation segmentectomy and multimodal therapy significantly improved CPN rates compared with TACE alone. A LI-RADS treatment response of nonviable did not confidently predict CPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKenzie Mosenthal
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - William Adams
- Public Health Sciences, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Scott Cotler
- Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Xianzhong Ding
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Marc Borge
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Angelo Malamis
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - David Lee
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tarita Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Parag Amin
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Christopher Molvar
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois; Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng X, Zhang L, Niu H, Zhang H, Yang L, Wen Y, Chen SY, Shi Y, He Z, Yu L, Wang Y, Huang X, Wang Z, Qin M, Wen X, Zhang Z, Song J, Zheng Z, Yin H, Zhang H, Ma L, Wei J, Wu X, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Lu Q, Xiao H, Liu T, Fang P, Wei L, Gandhi RT, Dong J. Selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres followed by anatomical hepatectomy: A potential curative strategy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024; 20:319-322. [PMID: 36658669 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
About 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are in advanced stages and ineligible for curative surgery. Palliative treatments just maintained limited survival, thus an effective downstaging therapy is badly needed. Here we report an initially unresectable patient who underwent radical hepatectomy after successful downstaging with selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). A 34-year-old man was diagnosed with China Liver Cancer Staging (CNLC) IIIa HCC. Due to insufficient future liver remnant and vascular involvement, the patient was suggested to be unresectable. SIRT with yttrium-90 resin microspheres was given. At three months post-SIRT, a complete response was achieved. The tumor was downstaged to CNLC Ia stage. The patient underwent anatomical hepatectomy 5 months after SIRT. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen showed 4% viable tumor cells inside a necrotic mass. To our knowledge, this is the first case who underwent SIRT with yttrium-90 resin microspheres in China mainland. The success of the downstaging in this case renders a possible cure to be achieved in an initially unresectable patient. In addition, the nearly complete tumor necrosis in the resected specimen indicates a good prognosis post-surgery. This is the first case who underwent SIRT with yttrium-90 resin microspheres in China mainland. SIRT followed by anatomical hepatectomy is a potentially curative strategy for unresectable HCC, which deserves a confirmative trial in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaobin Feng
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Hui Zhang
- The Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Yang
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Yong Wen
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Steve Y Chen
- Department of Radiology, Banner University Medical Center-Phoenix, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Yuhong Shi
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Zuoxiang He
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Yu
- Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China
| | | | - Xin Huang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Mengmeng Qin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxi Wen
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenyu Zhang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiyong Song
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuozhao Zheng
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongfang Yin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Ma
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Jixiang Wei
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Xinlai Wu
- Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- The Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yue Zhao
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Lu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Xiao
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | | | - Pihua Fang
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Lai Wei
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ripal T Gandhi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen W, Hu Z, Li G, Zhang L, Li T. The State of Systematic Therapies in Clinic for Hepatobiliary Cancers. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:629-649. [PMID: 38559555 PMCID: PMC10981875 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s454666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatobiliary cancer (HBC) includes hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract carcinoma (cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma), and its morbidity and mortality are significantly correlated with disease stage. Surgery is the cornerstone of curative therapy for early stage of HBC. However, a large proportion of patients with HBC are diagnosed with advanced stage and can only receive systemic treatment. According to the results of clinical trials, the first-line and second-line treatment programs are constantly updated with the improvement of therapeutic effectiveness. In order to improve the therapeutic effect, reduce the occurrence of drug resistance, and reduce the adverse reactions of patients, the treatment of HBC has gradually developed from single-agent therapy to combination. The traditional therapeutic philosophy proposed that patients with advanced HBC are only amenable to systematic therapies. With some encouraging clinical trial results, the treatment concept has been revolutionized, and patients with advanced HBC who receive novel systemic combination therapies with multi-modality treatment (including surgery, transplant, TACE, HAIC, RT) have significantly improved survival time. This review summarizes the treatment options and the latest clinical advances of HBC in each stage and discusses future direction, in order to inform the development of more effective treatments for HBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixun Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhengnan Hu
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ganxun Li
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Geevarghese R, Bodard S, Razakamanantsoa L, Marcelin C, Petre EN, Dohan A, Kastler A, Frandon J, Barral M, Soyer P, Cornelis FH. Interventional Oncology: 2024 Update. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024:8465371241236152. [PMID: 38444144 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241236152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Interventional Oncology (IO) stands at the forefront of transformative cancer care, leveraging advanced imaging technologies and innovative interventions. This narrative review explores recent developments within IO, highlighting its potential impact facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI), personalized medicine and imaging innovations. The integration of AI in IO holds promise for accelerating tumour detection and characterization, guiding treatment strategies and refining predictive models. Imaging modalities, including functional MRI, PET and cone beam CT are reshaping imaging and precision. Navigation, fusion imaging, augmented reality and robotics have the potential to revolutionize procedural guidance and offer unparalleled accuracy. New developments are observed in embolization and ablative therapies. The pivotal role of genomics in treatment planning, targeted therapies and biomarkers for treatment response prediction underscore the personalization of IO. Quality of life assessment, minimizing side effects and long-term survivorship care emphasize patient-centred outcomes after IO treatment. The evolving landscape of IO training programs, simulation technologies and workforce competence ensures the field's adaptability. Despite barriers to adoption, synergy between interventional radiologists' proficiency and technological advancements hold promise in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Geevarghese
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sylvain Bodard
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Clement Marcelin
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux University, Hopital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Elena N Petre
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Radiology, Hopital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Adrian Kastler
- Department of Radiology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Julien Frandon
- Department of Radiology, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France
| | - Matthias Barral
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Soyer
- Department of Radiology, Hopital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Francois H Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lindemann J, Doyle MBM. Expanding the Boundaries for Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:129-143. [PMID: 37953032 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, which was the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide in 2020. Transplantation remains the preferred treatment for cure in otherwise unresectable HCC. There are several areas of active research that have led to expansion of eligibility criteria for transplantation including local-regional therapy for downstaging patients presenting outside of the Milan criteria and identification of tumor biomarkers aiding in the early diagnosis, determining prognosis and likelihood of recurrence after transplantation for HCC. New neoadjuvant therapies and post-transplant immunosuppression regimens may also result in expansion of transplant eligibility criteria for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Lindemann
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Maria Bernadette Majella Doyle
- Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Matevish L, Patel MS, Vagefi PA. Downstaging Techniques for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Candidates Awaiting Liver Transplantation. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:145-162. [PMID: 37953033 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
During the last decade, downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma has expanded the pool of patients eligible for liver transplantation. The literature is rife with attempts to elucidate best treatment strategies with novel locoregional and systemic therapies continuing to emerge. Several trials have confirmed the large-scale success of downstaging protocols, with equitable long-term survival and recurrence rates after liver transplant. We review the currently available techniques used for downstaging, including their indications, complications, and efficacies. New frontiers have focused on the potential role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, although more research is needed to delineate its role in current treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Matevish
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Parsia A Vagefi
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Behzadi AH, Haghani L, D'Souza DL, Flanagan S, Jones C. Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:48-55. [PMID: 38495267 PMCID: PMC10940042 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are common liver-directed therapies (LDTs) for unresectable HCC. While both deliver intra-arterial treatment directly to the site of the tumor, they differ in mechanisms of action and side effects. Several studies have compared their side effect profile, time to progression, and overall survival data, but often these lack practical considerations when choosing which treatment modality to use. Many factors can impact operator's choice for treatment, and the choice depends on treatment availability, cost, insurance coverage, operator's comfort level, patient-specific factors, tumor location, tumor biology, and disease stage. This review discusses survival data, time to progression data, as well as more practical patient and tumor characteristics for personalized LDT with TACE or TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Leila Haghani
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York City, New York
| | - Donna L. D'Souza
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Siobhan Flanagan
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Christopher Jones
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu X, Kwong A, Heller M, Lokken RP, Fidelman N, Mehta N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventional liver-directed therapies for downstaging of HCC before liver transplant. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:151-159. [PMID: 37639286 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are the 2 most used modalities for patients with HCC while awaiting liver transplant. The purpose of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing TACE and TARE for downstaging (DS) patients with HCC. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing TACE and TARE in DS HCC over a 5-year time horizon from a payer's perspective. The clinical course, including those who achieved successful DS leading to liver transplant and those who failed DS with possible disease progression, was obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Costs and effectiveness were measured in US dollars and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. TARE achieved a higher effectiveness of 2.51 QALY (TACE: 2.29 QALY) at a higher cost of $172,162 (TACE: $159,706), with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $55,964/QALY, making TARE the more cost-effective strategy. The difference in outcome was equivalent to 104 days (nearly 3.5 months) in compensated cirrhosis state. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that TARE was more cost-effective in 91.69% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. TARE was more effective if greater than 48.2% of patients who received TACE or TARE were successfully downstaged (base case: 74.6% from the pooled analysis of multiple published cohorts). TARE became more cost-effective when the cost of TACE exceeded $4,831 (base case: $12,722) or when the cost of TARE was lower than $43,542 (base case: $30,609). Subgroup analyses identified TARE to be the more cost-effective strategy if the TARE cohort required 1 fewer locoregional therapy than the TACE cohort. TARE is the more cost-effective DS strategy for patients with HCC exceeding Milan criteria compared to TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Wu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Allison Kwong
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Michael Heller
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - R Peter Lokken
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nicholas Fidelman
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Department of General Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bellendorf A, Mader N, Mueller SP, Ezziddin S, Bockisch A, Grafe H, Best J, Goebel J, Pöppel TD, Sabet A. Safety and Efficacy of Selective Internal Radionuclide Therapy with 90Y Glass Microspheres in Patients with Progressive Hepatocellular Carcinoma after the Failure of Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:101. [PMID: 38256934 PMCID: PMC10819448 DOI: 10.3390/ph17010101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the standard of care in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and selective internal radionuclide therapy (SIRT) with 90Y microspheres is mainly used as an alternative modality in patients considered poor candidates for TACE. Treatment with sorafenib is the recommended option for patients with progressive disease after TACE. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SIRT with glass microspheres in patients with progressive HCC after repeated TACE who are not eligible for treatment with sorafenib. Forty-seven patients with progressive HCC after a median of three TACE sessions (range 2-14) underwent SIRT (3.5 ± 1.5 GBq; liver target dose 110-120 Gy). Toxicity was recorded 4 and 12 weeks after treatment and reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. Treatment response was assessed three months after SIRT using multiphase computed tomography and modified criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazards model for uni- and multivariate analyses. Significant but reversible hepatotoxicity (≥grade 3) occurred in five patients (11%). No radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD) was observed. The number of previous TACE sessions and cumulative administered activity did not predict the incidence of post-SIRT significant hepatotoxicity. Treatment responses consisted of partial responses in 26 (55%), stable disease in 12 (26%), and progressive disease in 9 (19%) patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 9-13), and objective responses to SIRT were associated with a longer OS (p = 0.008). Significant hepatotoxicity (≥grade 3) after SIRT was a contributor to impaired survival (median OS 6 months (95% CI, 4-8) vs. 12 months (95% CI, 10-14), p < 0.001). SIRT with glass microspheres is a safe and effective salvage treatment for patients with progressive HCC refractory to TACE who are considered poor candidates for sorafenib treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Bellendorf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
- MVZ Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Strahlentherapie Essen GmbH, Ruüttenscheider Str. 191, 45131 Essen, Germany
| | - Nicolai Mader
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Stefan P. Mueller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
| | - Samer Ezziddin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße, 66421 Homburg, Germany;
| | - Andreas Bockisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
| | - Hong Grafe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
| | - Jan Best
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ruhr-University Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, 44892 Bochum, Germany;
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Juliane Goebel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Thorsten D. Pöppel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
- MVZ CDT Strahleninstitut GmbH, Turiner Straße 2, 50668 Cologne, Germany
| | - Amir Sabet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Patel M, Pillai A. Management of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systemic Versus Locoregional Therapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:159-172. [PMID: 37945141 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comprises a heterogeneous group of patients with varying levels of tumor burden. Transarterial chemoembolization was traditionally the mainstay of treatment for intermediate-stage HCC for almost 2 decades. New and emerging treatment options have revolutionized HCC therapy, allowing for broader application to patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage disease. Accordingly, new guidelines acknowledge these options, and intermediate stage HCC can now be treated with surgical, locoregional or systemic therapies, or a combination thereof. Patients will continue to benefit from the development of complex treatment strategies in a multidisciplinary setting to optimize individual outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikin Patel
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu XK, Yang LF, Chen YF, Chen ZW, Lu H, Shen XY, Chi MH, Wang L, Zhang H, Chen JF, Huang JY, Zeng YY, Yan ML, Zhang ZB. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation combined with lenvatinib plus camrelizumab as conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 67:102367. [PMID: 38169778 PMCID: PMC10758712 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The synergistic effect of locoregional therapy in combination with systemic therapy as a conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab (TACE + LEN + CAM) as conversion therapy for uHCC. Methods This single-arm, multicentre, prospective study was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Patients (aged 18-75 years) diagnosed with uHCC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG-PS) of 0-1 and Child-Pugh class A received camrelizumab (200 mg, every 3 weeks) and lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥60 kg: 12 mg/day; <60 kg: 8 mg/day) after TACE treatment. Surgery was performed after tumour was assessed as meeting the criteria for resection. Patients who did not meet the criteria for surgery continued to receive triple therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and safety. Secondary endpoints included the surgical conversion rate, radical (R0) resection rate, and disease control rate (DCR). This study was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050410). Findings Between Oct 25, 2021, and July 20, 2022, 55 patients were enrolled. As of the data cutoff on June 1, 2023, the median follow-up was 13.3 months (IQR 10.6-15.9 months). The best tumour response to triple therapy was complete response (CR) in 9 (16.4%) patients, partial response (PR) in 33 (60.0%) patients, stable disease (SD) in 5 (9.1%) patients, or progressive disease (PD) in 7 (12.7%) patients. The ORR was 76.4% (42/55, 95% CI, 65.2-87.6%), and the DCR was 85.5% (47/55, 95% CI, 76.2-94.8%) per mRECIST. Twenty-four (43.6%) of the 55 patients suffered from grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). No grade 5 TRAEs occurred. A total of 30 (30/55, 54.5%) patients were converted to resectable HCC and 29 (29/55, 52.7%) patients underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 96.6% (28/29). The major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the surgery population were 65.5% (19/29) and 20.7% (6/29), respectively. Only one patient developed a Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication (abdominal infection). No Clavien-Dindo IIIb-V complications occurred. The median OS and median PFS were not reached. Interpretation The triple therapy (TACE + LEN + CAM) is promising active for uHCC with a manageable safety. Moreover, triple therapy has good conversion efficiency and the surgery after conversion therapy is feasible and safe. To elucidate whether patients with uHCC accepting surgical treatment after the triple therapy can achieve better survival benefits than those who receive triple therapy only, well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed. Funding This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2022J01691) and the Youth Foundation of Fujian Province Health Science and Technology Project, China (2022QNA035).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu-Kun Wu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Institute of Abdominal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lan-Fang Yang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Institute of Abdominal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yu-Feng Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China
| | - Zhong-Wu Chen
- Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hao Lu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Xiamen Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Xiamen, China
| | - Xue-Yi Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China
| | - Min-Hui Chi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Institute of Abdominal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Institute of Abdominal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Fei Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China
| | - Jing-Yao Huang
- Department of Intervention, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yong-Yi Zeng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mao-Lin Yan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Bo Zhang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Institute of Abdominal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lindemann J, Yu J, Doyle MBM. Downstaging Hepatocellular Carcinoma before Transplantation: Role of Immunotherapy Versus Locoregional Approaches. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:143-158. [PMID: 37945140 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to be a leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. With advances in locoregional therapy for unresectable HCC during the last 2 decades and the recent expansion of transplant criteria for HCC, as well as ongoing organ shortages, patients are spending more time on the waitlist, which has resulted in an increased usage of locoregional therapies. The plethora of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors under investigation represent the new horizon of treatment of HCC not only in advanced stages but also potentially at every stage of diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Lindemann
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jennifer Yu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Maria Bernadette Majella Doyle
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kamal O, Horvat N, Arora S, Chaudhry H, Elmohr M, Khanna L, Nepal PS, Wungjramirun M, Nandwana SB, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Lee J, Kielar A, Marks R, Elsayes K, Fung A. Understanding the role of radiologists in complex treatment decisions for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3677-3687. [PMID: 37715846 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04033-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver and represents a significant global health burden. Management of HCC can be challenging due to multiple factors, including variable expectations for treatment outcomes. Several treatment options are available, each with specific eligibility and ineligibility criteria, and are provided by a multidisciplinary team of specialists. Radiologists should be aware of the types of treatment options available, as well as the criteria guiding the development of individualized treatment plans. This awareness enables radiologists to contribute effectively to patient-centered multidisciplinary tumor boards for HCC and play a central role in reassessing care plans when the treatment response is deemed inadequate. This comprehensive review aims to equip radiologists with an overview of HCC staging systems, treatment options, and eligibility criteria. The review also discusses the significance of imaging in HCC diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring treatment response. Furthermore, we highlight the crucial branch points in the treatment decision-making process that depend on radiological interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Kamal
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L340, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Natally Horvat
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Manida Wungjramirun
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L340, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | | | | | - James Lee
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alice Fung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L340, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Binzaqr S, Debordeaux F, Blanc JF, Papadopoulos P, Hindie E, Lapouyade B, Pinaquy JB. Efficacy of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-Incomplete Response to Chemoembolization. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1676. [PMID: 38139803 PMCID: PMC10747012 DOI: 10.3390/ph16121676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common neoplasms worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Several liver-targeted intra-arterial therapies are available for unresectable HCC, including selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Those two are the most used treatment modalities in localized non-operable HCC. TACE is the treatment option for patients with stage B, according to the BCLC staging system. In contrast, SIRT does not have an official role in the treatment algorithm, but recent studies showed promising outcomes in patients treated with SIRT. Although TACE is globally a safe procedure, it might provoke several vascular complications such as spasms, inflammatory constriction, and, in severe cases, occlusion, dissection, or collateralization. Hence, it is acclaimed that those complications could restrain the targeted response of the radio-embolization when we use it as second-line therapy post TACE. In this study, we will assess the efficacity of SIRT using Yttrium 90 Microspheres post incomplete or failure response to TACE. In our retrospective study, we had 23 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, those patients have been followed radiologically and biologically. Then, we evaluated the therapeutic effect according to the mRECIST criteria, in addition to the personalized dose analysis. We found 8 patients were treated with TheraSphere®, with a median tumor absorbed dose of 445 Gy, while 15 received SIR-Spheres® treatment with a mean tumor dose of 268 Gy. After radiological analysis, 56.5% of the patients had a complete response, and 17.3% showed partial response, whereas 13% had stable disease and 13% had progressive disease. For patients treated with SIRT after an incomplete response or failure to TACE, we found an objective response rate of 73.8%. Despite the known vascular complications of TACE, SIRT can give a favorable response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Binzaqr
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, 33405 Talence, France; (J.-F.B.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (F.D.); (J.-B.P.)
| | - Frederic Debordeaux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (F.D.); (J.-B.P.)
| | - Jean-Frédéric Blanc
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, 33405 Talence, France; (J.-F.B.)
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Oncology, CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Panteleimon Papadopoulos
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (P.P.); (B.L.)
| | - Elif Hindie
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, 33405 Talence, France; (J.-F.B.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (F.D.); (J.-B.P.)
| | - Bruno Lapouyade
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (P.P.); (B.L.)
| | - Jean-Baptiste Pinaquy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; (F.D.); (J.-B.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Elderkin J, Al Hallak N, Azmi AS, Aoun H, Critchfield J, Tobon M, Beal EW. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Surveillance, Diagnosis, Evaluation and Management. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5118. [PMID: 37958294 PMCID: PMC10647678 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks fourth in cancer-related deaths worldwide. Semiannual surveillance of the disease for patients with cirrhosis or hepatitis B virus allows for early detection with more favorable outcomes. The current underuse of surveillance programs demonstrates the need for intervention at both the patient and provider level. Mail outreach along with navigation provision has proven to increase surveillance follow-up in patients, while provider-targeted electronic medical record reminders and compliance reports have increased provider awareness of HCC surveillance. Imaging is the primary mode of diagnosis in HCC with The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) being a widely accepted comprehensive system that standardizes the reporting and data collection for HCC. The management of HCC is complex and requires multidisciplinary team evaluation of each patient based on their preference, the state of the disease, and the available medical and surgical interventions. Staging systems are useful in determining the appropriate intervention for HCC. Early-stage HCC is best managed by curative treatment modalities, such as liver resection, transplant, or ablation. For intermediate stages of the disease, transarterial local regional therapies can be applied. Advanced stages of the disease are treated with systemic therapies, for which there have been recent advances with new drug combinations. Previously sorafenib was the mainstay systemic treatment, but the recent introduction of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab proves to have a greater impact on overall survival. Although there is a current lack of improved outcomes in Phase III trials, neoadjuvant therapies are a potential avenue for HCC management in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Elderkin
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA;
| | - Najeeb Al Hallak
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; (N.A.H.); (A.S.A.)
| | - Asfar S. Azmi
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; (N.A.H.); (A.S.A.)
| | - Hussein Aoun
- Department of Radiology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; (H.A.); (J.C.)
| | - Jeffrey Critchfield
- Department of Radiology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; (H.A.); (J.C.)
| | - Miguel Tobon
- Department of Surgery, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA;
| | - Eliza W. Beal
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; (N.A.H.); (A.S.A.)
- Department of Surgery, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yu Q, Khanjyan M, Fidelman N, Pillai A. Contemporary applications of Y90 for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Commun 2023; 7:e0288. [PMID: 37782464 PMCID: PMC10545406 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres has been widely adopted for the treatment of HCC. Recent advances in yttrium-90 (90Y) dosimetry have led to durable local responses. Radiation segmentectomy has become a viable alternative to thermal ablation for early-stage HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 0 and A) and has been commonly used as a bridge to transplant. TARE is also commonly used for downstaging to transplant using traditional lobar dosimetry and radiation segmentectomy techniques. Radiation lobectomy has a dual role in local tumor control and induction of contralateral liver lobe hypertrophy as a bridge to resection for patients with an inadequate future liver remnant. TARE continues to provide disease control for patients with limited vascular invasion and may be an alternative to systemic therapy for patients with localized advanced disease. The potential synergy between TARE and immunotherapy has been recognized, and prospective studies evaluating this combination are needed for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B and C HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yu
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Khanjyan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nicholas Fidelman
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Choksi EJ, Elsayed M, Kokabi N. Antitumor Activity of Metformin Combined with Locoregional Therapy for Liver Cancer: Evidence and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4538. [PMID: 37760509 PMCID: PMC10526211 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This article aimed to examine the effect of metformin use on improving outcomes after liver-directed therapy in patients with HCC and identify future directions with the adjuvant use of and potential therapeutic agents that operate on similar mechanistic pathways. Databases were queried to identify pertinent articles on metformin's use as an anti-cancer agent in HCC. Eleven studies were included, with five pre-clinical and six clinical studies. The mean overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were both higher in the locoregional therapy (LRT) + metformin-treated groups. The outcome variables, including local tumor recurrence rate, reduction in HCC tumor growth and size, tumor growth, proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells, HCC cell apoptosis, DNA damage, and cell cycle arrest, showed favorable outcomes in the LRT + metformin-treated groups compared with LRT alone. This systemic review provides a strong signal that metformin use can improve the tumor response after locoregional therapy. Well-controlled prospective trials will be needed to elucidate the potential antitumor effects of metformin and other mTOR inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eshani J. Choksi
- School of Osteopathic Medicine, Rowan University, Stratford, NJ 08084, USA;
| | - Mohammad Elsayed
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Takamoto T, Maruki Y, Kondo S. Recent updates in the use of pharmacological therapies for downstaging in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1567-1575. [PMID: 37357809 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2229728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer, but only 20-30% of patients benefit from potentially curative treatments such as liver resection or transplantation. This article reviews conventional treatments and recent progress in pharmacotherapy for advanced HCC, with a focus on downstaging unresectable tumors to resectable status. AREAS COVERED In this article, conventional treatments and recent progress in pharmacotherapy for advanced HCC, aiming at downstaging from unresectable to resectable status, are reviewed. Future prospectives of combination therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors were also introduced by reviewing recent clinical trials, paying attention to the objective response rate as its potential of downstaging treatments. EXPERT OPINION The newly developed pharmacological therapies showed higher responses. Although various tumor statuses in advanced HCC hamper detailed analysis of successful conversion rate, the novel combined immunotherapies are expected to provide more opportunities for subsequent curative surgery for initially unresectable advanced HCC. The conversion treatment strategies for unresectable HCC should be separately discussed for 'technically resectable but oncologically unfavorable' HCC and metastatic or invasive HCC beyond curative surgical treatments. The optimal downstaging treatment strategy for advanced HCC is awaited. Elucidation of preoperatively available factors that predict successful downstaging will allow the tailoring of promising initial treatments leading to conversion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Takamoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Maruki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kondo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang Z, Hu Z, Fu Y, Hu D, Zhou Z, Chen M, Pan Y, Zhang Y. Laparoscopic Hepatectomy versus Open Hepatectomy After Conversion Therapy Using Transarterial Chemoembolization or Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Patients with Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2023; 10:1157-1167. [PMID: 37497428 PMCID: PMC10368132 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s417739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is more advantageous than open hepatectomy (OH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, surgical methods of conversion resection for patients with HCC have not been compared. We aimed to compare LH with OH for HCC after conversion therapy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of 334 patients who underwent conversion resection between January 2016 and December 2020 at Sun Yat-sen University, China. Propensity score matching (PSM) of patients in a ratio of 1:2 was conducted, and 62 patients and 121 patients who underwent LH and OH, respectively, were matched. Results The LH and OH groups differed at baseline in terms of ALT (P=0.008), AFP (P=0.042), largest tumor size (P=0.028), macrovascular invasion (P=0.006), BCLC stages (P=0.021), and CNLC stages (P=0.048). The incidences of postoperative complications before and after PSM were lower in the LH group than in the OH group (P=0.007 and 0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two groups (P=0.79 and 0.8, respectively). According to the multivariable Cox regression analyses, the largest tumor size (P<0.0001) and tumor number (P=0.004) were significant and independent prognostic factors of OS. Conclusion In our study, we found that LH is technically feasible and safe in patients after conversion therapy. Compared with OH, LH showed similar OS and RFS and was associated with fewer postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyun Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zili Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yizhen Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dandan Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhongguo Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Minshan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yangxun Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yaojun Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Huang J, Wang ZG, Tao QF, Yang Y, Yuan SX, Gu FM, Liu H, Pan ZY, Jiang BG, Lau WY, Zhou WP. Efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib-based combination therapies for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center retrospective study. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1198562. [PMID: 37483609 PMCID: PMC10361059 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1198562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Reports on Lenvatinib-based therapies show promising treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the effect and safety of Lenvatinib-based therapies still need to be further studies. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study on the safety and treatment efficacy of Lenvatinib-based combination therapies for uHCC Patients. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR). Results Of 91 patients, there were 16 females and 75 males with uHCC who received systemic therapies based on Lenvatinib in our center. Forty-six patients (50.5%) received Lenvatinib combined with PD-1 antibody treatment. All these patients also received local therapy with the exception of 2 patients. The remaining 36 patinets received Lenvatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), 1 patient treated Lenvatinib combined with radiotherapy, 8 patients received Lenvatinib alone. At a median treatment time of 8 months, the objective response rate (ORR) of the entire cohort was 58.2% (53 patients), including 7 patients with CR and 46 patients with PR. 21 patients (23.1%) had SD. The disease control rate (DCR) of all patients was 81.3% (74 patients). However, 17 patients (18.7%) developed PD. The 1- and 2-year cumulative OS rates for the entire cohort were 66.8% and 39.3%, while the corresponding PFS rates were 38.0% and 17.1%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed multiple tumor sites to be an independent OS risk factor for uHCC patients (HR=2.204, 95% CI=1.104-4.399, P=0.025). The most frequently reported adverse events in all patients were AST elevation (51.6%), followed by hypertension (33.0%), ALT elevation (26.4%), and decreased appetite (25.3%). After a combination treatment of Lenvatinib-based therapies, 15 patients met the criteria for salvage liver resection and underwent down-staging hepatectomy with a curative intent. The combination of PD-1 treatment was not very effective in improving the prognosis of uHCC patients treated with Lenvatinib combined with TACE. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that a proportive of patients benefited from Lenvatinib-based combination therapies with manageable safety profiles, allowing these patients to undergo downstaging surgery with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Huang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Guang Wang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi-Fei Tao
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Yang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng-Xian Yuan
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fang-Ming Gu
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui Liu
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ze-Ya Pan
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bei-Ge Jiang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Wei-Ping Zhou
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chamseddine S, LaPelusa M, Kaseb AO. Systemic Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapies in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3508. [PMID: 37444618 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to pose a significant global health problem. Several systemic therapies have recently been shown to improve survival for patients with unresectable disease. However, evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapies in patients with resectable disease is limited, despite the high risk of recurrence. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapies are being investigated for their potential to reduce recurrence after resection and improve overall survival. Our review identified various early-phase clinical trials showing impressive preliminary signals of pathologic complete response in resectable disease, and others suggesting that neoadjuvant therapies-particularly when combined with adjuvant strategies-may convert unresectable disease to resectable disease and cause significant tumor necrosis, potentially decreasing recurrence rates. The role of adjuvant therapies alone may also play a part in the management of these patients, particularly in reducing recurrence rates. Heterogeneity in trial design, therapies used, patient selection, and a scarcity of randomized phase III trials necessitate the cautious implementation of these treatment strategies. Future research is required to identify predictive biomarkers, optimize the timing and type of therapeutic combinations, and minimize treatment-related adverse effects, thereby personalizing and enhancing treatment strategies for patients with resectable and borderline resectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadi Chamseddine
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael LaPelusa
- Division of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ahmed Omar Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nakamura M, Mochizuki C, Kuroda C, Shiohama Y, Nakamura J. Size effect of fluorescent thiol-organosilica particles on their distribution in the mouse spleen. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2023; 228:113397. [PMID: 37348267 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
We investigated the distribution of intravenously administered thiol-organosilica particle (thiol-OS) in the spleen to evaluate their size effect in mice. A single administration of particles of thiol-OS containing rhodamine B (Rh) (90, 280, 340, 450, 630, 1110, 1670, and 3030 nm in diameter) was performed. After 24 h, we conducted a combination analysis using histological studies by fluorescent microscopy and quantitative inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), which revealed no clear correlation between the particle size and spleen uptake of particle weight and number per tissue weight, and the injection dose. Moreover, Rh with 450 nm diameter (Rh450) showed the highest uptake, and Rh with 340 nm diameter (Rh340) showed the lowest uptake. Histologically, large fluorescent areas in the marginal zone (MZ) and red pulp (RP) of the spleen were observed for all particle sizes, but less in the follicle of white pulp. Using combination analysis using the particle weights of ICP-OES and the fluorescent area, we compared the distributions of each particle in each region. Rh450 had the largest accumulated weight in the MZ and RP. Particles larger than Rh450 showed negative correlations between their sizes and accumulated weight in the MZ and RP. Simultaneous dual administration of particles using Rhs and thiol-OS containing fluorescein (90 nm in diameter) showed the size-dependent difference in cellular distribution and intracellular localization. Immunohistochemical staining against macrophage markers, CD169, and F4/80 showed various colocalization patterns with macrophages that uptook particles, indicating differences in particle uptake in each macrophage may have novel significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michihiro Nakamura
- Department of Organ Anatomy and Nanomedicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan; Core Clusters for Research Initiatives of Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.
| | - Chihiro Mochizuki
- Department of Organ Anatomy and Nanomedicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Chika Kuroda
- Yamaguchi University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Yasuo Shiohama
- Department of Organ Anatomy and Nanomedicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Junna Nakamura
- Department of Organ Anatomy and Nanomedicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Campos-Varela I, Rammohan A, Chadha R, Alconchel F, Hakeem AR, Mathew JS, Goldaracena N, Syn N, Shankar S, Patel D, Keskin O, Liu J, Nasralla D, Mazzola A, Shingina A, Spiro M, Patel MS, Tanaka T, Victor D, Yoon U, Yoon YI, Shaker T, Vinaixa C, Kirchner VA, De Martin E. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society. Transplantation 2023; 107:1226-1231. [PMID: 37220340 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
After a virtual congress in 2021 and a previous absence in 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the 27th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society was held from May 4 to 7, 2022, in a hybrid format in Istanbul, with 1123 (58% on-site) liver transplant professionals from 61 countries attending the meeting. The hybrid format successfully achieved a balance of much yearned-for "in-person interaction" and global online participation. Almost 500 scientific abstracts were presented. In this report, the Vanguard Committee aims to present a summary of key invited lectures and selected abstracts for the liver transplant community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Campos-Varela
- Liver Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Dr Rela Institute and Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Ryan Chadha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Abdul R Hakeem
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St James's University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Abdominal Organ Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Sadhana Shankar
- The Liver Unit, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dhupal Patel
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Onur Keskin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jiang Liu
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - David Nasralla
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alessandra Mazzola
- Sorbonne Université, Unité médicale de transplantation hépatique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Shingina
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michael Spiro
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tomohiro Tanaka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - David Victor
- Sherrie and Alan Conover Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation. Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Uzung Yoon
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Tamer Shaker
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Carmen Vinaixa
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Varvara A Kirchner
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Eleonora De Martin
- AP-HP, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato- Biliaire, Unité INSERM 1193, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wu JL, Luo JY, Jiang ZB, Huang SB, Chen GR, Ran HY, Liang QY, Huang MS, Lai LS, Chen JW. Inflammation-related nomogram for predicting survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma received conversion therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:3168-3184. [PMID: 37346152 PMCID: PMC10280795 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i20.3168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of conversion therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common clinical concern.
AIM To analyse the prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable HCC who received conversion therapy.
METHODS One hundred and fifty patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n = 120) and a validation cohort (n = 30). Using the independent risk factors in the training cohort, a nomogram model was constructed to predict OS for patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization following hepatic resection. The nomogram was internally validated with the bootstrapping method. The predictive performance of nomogram was assessed by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), calibration plot and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and compared with six other conventional HCC staging systems.
RESULTS Multivariate Cox analysis identified that albumin, blood urea nitrogen, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, macrovascular invasion and tumour number were the six independent prognostic factors correlated with OS in nomogram model. The C-index in the training cohort and validation cohort were 0.752 and 0.807 for predicting OS, which were higher than those of the six conventional HCC staging systems (0.563 to 0.715 for the training cohort and 0.458 to 0.571 for the validation cohort). The calibration plots showed good consistency between the nomogram prediction of OS and the actual observations of OS. Decision curve analyses indicated satisfactory clinical utility. With a total nomogram score of 196, patients were accurately classified into low-risk and high-risk groups. Furthermore, we have deployed the model into online calculators that can be accessed for free at https://ctmodelforunresectablehcc.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/.
CONCLUSION The nomogram achieved optimal individualized prognostication of OS in HCC patients who received conversion therapy, which could be a useful clinical tool to help guide postoperative personalized interventions and prognosis judgement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Lin Wu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jun-Yang Luo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zai-Bo Jiang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Si-Bo Huang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ge-Run Chen
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hui-Ying Ran
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Qi-Yue Liang
- Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ming-Sheng Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Li-Sha Lai
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jun-Wei Chen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wong JK, Lim HJ, Tam VC, Burak KW, Dawson LA, Chaudhury P, Abraham RJ, Meyers BM, Sapisochin G, Valenti D, Samimi S, Ramjeesingh R, Mujoomdar A, Martins I, Dixon E, Segedi M, Liu DM. Clinical consensus statement: Establishing the roles of locoregional and systemic therapies for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in Canada. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 115:102526. [PMID: 36924644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and approximately one-third of patients present with intermediate-stage disease. The treatment landscape of intermediate-stage HCC is rapidly evolving due to developments in local, locoregional and systemic therapies. Treatment recommendations focused on this heterogenous disease stage and that take into account the Canadian reality are lacking. To address this gap, a pan-Canadian group of experts in hepatology, transplant, surgery, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, interventional radiology, and medical oncology came together to develop consensus recommendations on management of intermediate-stage HCC relevant to the Canadian context. METHODS A modified Delphi framework was used to develop consensus statements with strengths of recommendation and supporting levels of evidence graded using the AHA/ACC classification system. Tentative consensus statements were drafted based on a systematic search and expert input in a series of iterative feedback cycles and were then circulated via online survey to assess the level of agreement. RESULTS & CONCLUSION The pre-defined ratification threshold of 80 % agreement was reached for all statements in the areas of multidisciplinary treatment (n = 4), intra-arterial therapy (n = 14), biologics (n = 5), radiation therapy (n = 3), surgical resection and transplantation (n = 7), and percutaneous ablative therapy (n = 4). These generally reflected an expansion in treatment options due to developments in previously established or emergent techniques, introduction of new and more active therapies and increased therapeutic flexibility. These developments have allowed for greater treatment tailoring and personalization as well as a paradigm shift toward strategies with curative intent in a wider range of disease settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason K Wong
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Howard J Lim
- BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.
| | - Vincent C Tam
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
| | - Kelly W Burak
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada.
| | | | - Robert J Abraham
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 6299 South St, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - Brandon M Meyers
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada.
| | | | - David Valenti
- McGill University, 845 Rue Sherbrooke O, Montréal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
| | - Setareh Samimi
- Hopital Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, University of Montreal, 5400 Boul Gouin O, Montréal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada.
| | - Ravi Ramjeesingh
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 6299 South St, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - Amol Mujoomdar
- Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.
| | - Ilidio Martins
- Kaleidoscope Strategic, Inc. 1 King Street W, Suite 4800 - 117, Toronto, ON M5H 1A1, Canada.
| | - Elijah Dixon
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Maja Segedi
- Department of Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Jim Pattison Pavilion, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - David M Liu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2023; 23:1-120. [PMID: 37384024 PMCID: PMC10202234 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) and National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea
- Corresponding author: KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee (KPGRC) (Committee Chair: Joong-Won Park) Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea Tel. +82-31-920-1605, Fax: +82-31-920-1520, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shimada S, Shamaa T, Ivanics T, Kitajima T, Adhnan M, Collins K, Rizzari M, Yoshida A, Abouljoud M, Salgia R, Nagai S. Multiple Pretransplant Treatments for Patients Without Pathological Complete Response may Worsen Posttransplant Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1408-1419. [PMID: 36434482 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12789-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplant (LT) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often receive cancer treatment before transplant. We investigated the impact of pre-transplant treatment for HCC on the risk of posttransplant recurrence. METHODS Adult HCC patients with LT at our institution between 2013 and 2020 were included. The impact of pre-LT cancer treatments on the cumulative recurrence was evaluated, using the Gray and Fine-Gray methods adjusted for confounding factors. Outcomes were considered in two ways: 1) by pathologically complete response (pCR) status within patients received pre-LT treatment; and 2) within patients without pCR, grouped by pre-LT treatment as A) none; B) one treatment; C) multiple treatments. RESULTS The sample included 179 patients, of whom 151 (84%) received pretreatment and 42 (28% of treated) demonstrated pCR. Overall, 22 (12%) patients experienced recurrence. The 5-year cumulative post-LT recurrence rate was significantly lower in patients with pCR than those without pCR (4.8% vs. 19.2%, P = 0.03). In bivariable analyses, pCR significantly decreased risk of recurrence. Among the 137 patients without pCR (viable HCC in the explant), 28 (20%) had no pretreatment (A), 70 (52%) had one treatment (B), and 39 (20%) had multiple treatments (C). Patients in Group C had higher 5-year recurrence rates than those in A or B (39.6% vs. 8.2%, 6.5%, P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively). In bivariable analyses, multiple treatments was significantly associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS pCR is a favorable prognostic factor after LT. When pCR was not achieved by pre-LT treatment, the number of treatments might be associated with post-LT oncological prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shingo Shimada
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Tayseer Shamaa
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Toshihiro Kitajima
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mohamed Adhnan
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Kelly Collins
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Michael Rizzari
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Atsushi Yoshida
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Marwan Abouljoud
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Reena Salgia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Shunji Nagai
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jiang C, Sun XD, Qiu W, Chen YG, Sun DW, Lv GY. Conversion therapy in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: What's new in the era of molecular and immune therapy? Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:7-13. [PMID: 36825482 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally, with limited therapies and unsatisfactory prognosis once in the advanced stages. With promising advances in locoregional and systematic treatments, fast development of targeted drugs, the success of immunotherapy, as well as the emergence of the therapeutic alliance, conversion therapy has recently become more well developed and an effective therapeutic strategy. This article aimed to review recent developments in conversion therapy in liver transplantation (LT) for HCC. DATA SOURCES We searched for relevant publications on PubMed before September 2022, using the terms "HCC", "liver transplantation", "downstaging", "bridging treatment" and "conversion therapy." RESULTS Conversion therapy was frequently represented as a combination of multiple treatment modalities to downstage HCC and make patients eligible for LT. Although combining various local and systematic treatments in conversion therapy is still controversial, growing evidence has suggested that multimodal combined treatment strategies downstage HCC in a shorter time, which ultimately increases the opportunities for LT. Moreover, the recent breakthrough of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for HCC also benefit patients with advanced-stage tumors. CONCLUSIONS In the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, applying the thinking of transplant oncology to benefit HCC patients receiving LT is a new topic that has shed light on advanced-stage patients. With the expansion of conversion therapy concepts, further investigation and research is required to realize the full potential of conversion treatment strategies, including accurately selecting candidates, determining the timing of surgery, improving the conversion rate, and guaranteeing the safety and long-term efficacy of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Jiang
- General Surgery Center, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Sun
- General Surgery Center, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Wei Qiu
- General Surgery Center, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Yu-Guo Chen
- General Surgery Center, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Da-Wei Sun
- General Surgery Center, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Guo-Yue Lv
- General Surgery Center, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Patel MV, Davies H, Williams AO, Bromilow T, Baker H, Mealing S, Holmes H, Anderson N, Ahmed O. Transarterial therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for transarterial embolization: a US cost-effectiveness analysis. J Med Econ 2023; 26:1061-1071. [PMID: 37632520 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2248840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and drug-eluting beads chemoembolization (DEE-TACE) for patients with unresectable early- to intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). DESIGN A cohort-based Markov model with a five-year time horizon was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the three embolization treatments. Upon entering the model, patients with HCC received either TARE or one of the two other embolization treatments. Patients remained in a "watch and wait" state for tumor downstaging that allowed them to move to health states such as liver transplant, resection, systemic therapies, or cure. Clinical input parameters were retrieved from the published literature, and where values could not be sourced, assumptions were made and validated by clinical experts. Health benefits were quantified using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost input parameters were obtained from various sources, including the Medicare Cost Report, IBM® Micromedex RED BOOK, and published literature. RESULTS At five years, TARE was found to be cost-saving (saving $15,779 per person compared to cTACE) and produced 0.33 more QALYs per person than cTACE. TARE cost $13,696 more but produced 0.33 more QALYs than DEE-TACE, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $41,474 per QALY gained at five years. After accounting for parameter uncertainty, the likelihood of TARE being cost-effective was at least 90% against all comparators at a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS TARE produces more QALYs than cTACE and DEE-TACE, with a high probability of being cost-effective against both comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikin V Patel
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Heather Davies
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | | | - Tom Bromilow
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Hannah Baker
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Stuart Mealing
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Hayden Holmes
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | | | - Osman Ahmed
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mosconi C, Cappelli A, Pettinato C, Cocozza MA, Vara G, Terzi E, Morelli MC, Lodi Rizzini E, Renzulli M, Modestino F, Serenari M, Bonfiglioli R, Calderoni L, Tabacchi E, Cescon M, Morganti AG, Trevisani F, Piscaglia F, Fanti S, Strigari L, Cucchetti A, Golfieri R. Improved Survival after Transarterial Radioembolisation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Gives the Procedure Added Value. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247469. [PMID: 36556085 PMCID: PMC9781303 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial Radioembolisation (TARE) requires multidisciplinary experience and skill to be effective. The aim of this study was to identify determinants of survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), focusing on learning curves, technical advancements, patient selection and subsequent therapies. METHODS From 2005 to 2020, 253 patients were treated. TARE results achieved in an initial period (2005-2011) were compared to those obtained in a more recent period (2012-2020). To isolate the effect of the treatment period, differences between the two periods were balanced using "entropy balance". RESULTS Of the 253 patients, 68 were treated before 2012 and 185 after 2012. In the second period, patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) score of 1 (p = 0.025) less frequently, less liver involvement (p = 0.006) and a lesser degree of vascular invasion (p = 0.019). The median overall survival (OS) of patients treated before 2012 was 11.2 months and that of patients treated beginning in 2012 was 25.7 months. After reweighting to isolate the effect of the treatment period, the median OS of patients before 2012 increased to 16 months. CONCLUSIONS Better patient selection, refinement of technique and adoption of personalised dosimetry improved survival after TARE. Conversely, sorafenib after TARE did not impact life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Mosconi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberta Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Cinzia Pettinato
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Adriana Cocozza
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-051-6362-311
| | - Giulio Vara
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Terzi
- Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Morelli
- Division of Internal Medicine for the Treatment of Severe Organ Failure, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Elisa Lodi Rizzini
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Renzulli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Modestino
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Rachele Bonfiglioli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Letizia Calderoni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Elena Tabacchi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Franco Trevisani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Semeiotica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Department of Medical Physics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences—DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni—Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Alma Mater Studiorum, Università Degli Studi Di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:1126-1240. [PMID: 36447411 PMCID: PMC9747269 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
35
|
Knavel Koepsel EM, Smolock AR, Pinchot JW, Kim CY, Ahmed O, Chamarthy MRK, Hecht EM, Hwang GL, Kaplan DE, Luh JY, Marrero JA, Monroe EJ, Poultsides GA, Scheidt MJ, Hohenwalter EJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Liver Cancer: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S390-S408. [PMID: 36436965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The treatment and management of hepatic malignancies can be complex because it encompasses a variety of primary and metastatic malignancies and an assortment of local and systemic treatment options. When to use each of these treatments is critical to ensure the most appropriate care for patients. Interventional radiologists have a key role to play in the delivery of a variety of liver directed treatments including percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization with bland embolic particles alone, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with injection of a chemotherapeutic emulsion, and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Based on 9 clinical variants, the appropriateness of each treatment is described in this document. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amanda R Smolock
- Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Charles Y Kim
- Panel Vice-Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Osmanuddin Ahmed
- Vice-Chair of Wellness, Director of Venous Interventions, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Murthy R K Chamarthy
- Vascular Institute of North Texas, Dallas, Texas; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Elizabeth M Hecht
- Vice-Chair of Academic Affairs, Professor of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; RADS Committee; Member of Appropriateness Subcommittees on Hepatobiliary Topics; Member of LI-RADS
| | - Gloria L Hwang
- Associate Chair of Clinical Performance Improvement, Stanford Radiology, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - David E Kaplan
- Section Chief of Hepatology at the University of Pennsylvania Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
| | - Join Y Luh
- Providence Health Radiation Oncology Focus Group Chair, Providence St. Joseph Health, Eureka, California; Commission on Radiation Oncology; ACR CARROS President; ACR Council Steering Committee; California Radiological Society Councilor to ACR
| | - Jorge A Marrero
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - George A Poultsides
- Chief of Surgical Oncology and Professor of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Society of Surgical Oncology
| | - Matthew J Scheidt
- Program Director of Independent IR Residency, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Eric J Hohenwalter
- Specialty Chair; Chief, MCW VIR, Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liu R, Li H, Qiu Y, Liu H, Cheng Z. Recent Advances in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment with Radionuclides. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:1339. [PMID: 36355512 PMCID: PMC9694760 DOI: 10.3390/ph15111339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
As the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by late detection, difficult diagnosis and treatment, rapid progression, and poor prognosis. Current treatments for liver cancer include surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, liver transplantation, chemotherapy, external radiation therapy, and internal radionuclide therapy. Radionuclide therapy is the use of high-energy radiation emitted by radionuclides to eradicate tumor cells, thus achieving the therapeutic effect. Recently, with the continuous development of biomedical technology, the application of radionuclides in treatment of HCC has progressed steadily. This review focuses on three types of radionuclide-based treatment regimens, including transarterial radioembolization (TARE), radioactive seed implantation, and radioimmunotherapy. Their research progress and clinical applications are summarized. The advantages, limitations, and clinical potential of radionuclide treatment of HCC are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiqi Liu
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China
| | - Hong Li
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China
| | - Yihua Qiu
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China
| | - Hongguang Liu
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Life and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110000, China
| | - Zhen Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Molecular Imaging Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
- Shandong Laboratory of Yantai Drug Discovery, Bohai Rim Advanced Research Institute for Drug Discovery, Yantai 264117, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:583-705. [PMID: 36263666 PMCID: PMC9597235 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
38
|
Huang AC, Dodge JL, Yao FY, Mehta N. National Experience on Waitlist Outcomes for Down-Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: High Dropout Rate in All-Comers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 21:1581-1589. [PMID: 36038129 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) grants priority listing for liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after successful down-staging to Milan criteria. We evaluated the national experience on down-staging by comparing 2 down-staging groups: tumor burden meeting UNOS down-staging (UNOS-DS) inclusion criteria, and all-comers (AC)-DS with initial tumor burden beyond UNOS-DS criteria vs patients always within Milan criteria. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS database of 23,398 patients listed for liver transplant who had submitted a hepatocellular carcinoma Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception application from 2010 to 2019, classified as always within Milan (n = 20,579), UNOS-DS (n = 2151), and AC-DS (n = 668). RESULTS The 2-year cumulative probabilities of dropout were 19% for Milan, 25% for UNOS-DS (P < .001), and 30% for AC-DS (P < .001). In multivariate analysis of the down-staging groups, factors predicting dropout included Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at listing (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; P < .001) and initial total tumor diameter (HR, 1.04; P = .002). Compared with α-fetoprotein (AFP) level ≤20 ng/mL, AFP levels of 21 to 100, 101 to 1000, and greater than 1000 ng/mL were associated with a higher risk of dropout (HRs, 1.63, 2.06, and 4.58, respectively; P < .001). A subset of all-comers with AFP levels greater than 100 ng/mL had a 2-year probability of dropout of 52% vs 26% for all others beyond Milan criteria (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS All-comers had a significantly higher risk for waitlist dropout compared with the UNOS-DS and Milan groups after initial successful down-staging to Milan criteria. In particular, the subgroup of AC-DS with an AFP level greater than 100 ng/mL had a greater than 50% probability of dropout in the next 2 years. These observations suggest a high likelihood of failure when expanding the indications for down-staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annsa C Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jennifer L Dodge
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Francis Y Yao
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen J, Zhang D, Yuan Y. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in conversion treatment of locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Exp Med 2022:10.1007/s10238-022-00873-6. [PMID: 36018466 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-022-00873-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Curative surgery and locoregional therapy are radical therapies for patients with HCC. But more than 80% of HCC patients cannot be fitful for radical therapies because of local progression or distant metastasis at initial diagnosis. Among patients with unresectable locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), some patients can be converted to be technically resectable by conversion treatment and salvage surgery. For unresectable locally advanced hepatocellular, conversion treatment prior to salvage surgery with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and other locoregional therapies improve outcomes. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy which show high antineoplastic activity in HCC patients by preclinical and clinical researches can also be a good choice for conversion therapy. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with locoregional therapy plus antiangiogenic agents or not is most potential conversion therapy comparing to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with antiangiogenic agents or CTLA-4 inhibitor. As more clinical evidence reported, PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy would be widely used in conversion treatment of locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaqi Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ding Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou, 310009, Zhejiang, China. .,Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Baker T, Tabrizian P, Zendejas I, Gamblin TC, Kazimi M, Boudjema K, Geller D, Salem R. Conversion to resection post radioembolization in patients with HCC: recommendations from a multidisciplinary working group. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1007-1018. [PMID: 35012876 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) glass microspheres is an efficacious option for converting appropriately selected patients with borderline-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to surgical candidacy. METHODS In 2018 and 2019, a diverse multidisciplinary group of surgical and interventional experts with experience using 90Y for downstaging and bridging to liver transplant convened to review peer-reviewed literature and personal experience in the use of 90Y to convert borderline resectable liver cancer patients to surgical candidacy. The working group included surgical oncologists specializing in liver cancer, liver transplant surgeons with experience in complex hepatobiliary surgery, and interventional radiologists with experience using 90Y. RESULTS This document presents expert recommendations based upon the group's experience and consensus. CONCLUSIONS By combining related evidence from the literature with expert experiences with TARE in surgical candidates, these recommendations aim to demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of TARE in converting borderline-resectable patients to surgical options. The document also addresses the concerns about potential complications associated with TARE during the surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia Baker
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David Geller
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Riad Salem
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cisneros-Garza L, González-Huezo M, Moctezuma-Velázquez C, Ladrón de Guevara-Cetina L, Vilatobá M, García-Juárez I, Alvarado-Reyes R, Álvarez-Treviño G, Allende-Pérez S, Bornstein-Quevedo L, Calderillo-Ruiz G, Carrillo-Martínez M, Castillo-Barradas M, Cerda-Reyes E, Félix-Leyva J, Gabutti-Thomas J, Guerrero-Ixtlahuac J, Higuera-de la Tijera F, Huitzil-Melendez D, Kimura-Hayama E, López-Hernández P, Malé-Velázquez R, Méndez-Sánchez N, Morales-Ruiz M, Ruíz-García E, Sánchez-Ávila J, Torrecillas-Torres L. The second Mexican consensus on hepatocellular carcinoma. Part II: Treatment. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 87:362-379. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
42
|
Rothenberger NJ, Yu Q, Ramasamy SK, Van Ha T, Zangan S, Navuluri R, Ahmed O. Segmental Yttrium-90 Radioembolization as an Initial Treatment for Solitary Unresectable HCC. THE ARAB JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable solitary HCC less than 5 cm who were treated with 90Y glass microspheres infused at a segmental level.
Materials and Methods Single-institution retrospective study of 35 patients with unresectable HCC deemed not suitable for percutaneous ablation who underwent segmental transarterial radioembolization (TARE) treatment. Eligibility criteria included patients with solitary, unilobar, < 5 cm unresectable HCC lesions who underwent TARE as a primary treatment strategy between November 2012 and April 2020. Imaging follow-up was performed on each patient at 3-, 6-, and 12 months post-treatment. Local and the overall tumor response was evaluated using mRECIST criteria, and primary endpoints were ORR, TTP, and OS. Adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5.0.
Statistical Analysis Patient demographics, baseline characteristics, and treatment characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Predictors of survival were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate OS.
Results Median tumor size was 3 cm (range: 1.0-4.8 cm) in the 35 patients studied, with 25.7% (9/35) being the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 and 62.9% (22/35) ECOG 1. Most patients (88.5%, 31/35) were of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C, with one patient each classified as BCLC-A and BCLC-0, respectively. For 34.2% (12/35), TARE functioned as a bridge to transplantation. Transplanted patients exhibited a median pathologic necrosis of 98% (IQR 7.5). Combined ORR for local and overall mRECIST at 12 months post-TARE was 94.3% and 85.7%, respectively. All patients had a mean local TTP of 11.9 months (CI: 2.7–21.0) and global TTP of 13.2 months (CI: 6.4–20.0). Among the 14.3% (5/35) of patients who experienced AEs following treatment, 80% (4/5) were Grade 1, one patient experienced a Grade 4, and all events resolved within 1 month of treatment. Total OS at 1 year was 97%, whereas patients who underwent OLT had an OS of 100%.
Conclusion Segmental TARE was a safe and effective treatment for solitary unresectable HCC less than 5 cm. When used as a bridge to transplant, explants showed near complete pathologic necrosis of treated lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Qian Yu
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Shakthi K. Ramasamy
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Thuong Van Ha
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Steven Zangan
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Rakesh Navuluri
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Couillard AB, Knott EA, Zlevor AM, Mezrich JD, Cristescu MM, Agarwal P, Ziemlewicz TJ, Longhurst C, Lubner MG, Hinshaw JL, Said A, Laeseke PF, Lucey MR, Rice JP, Foley D, Al-Adra D, Lee FT. Microwave ablation as bridging to liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center retrospective analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2022; 33:1045-1053. [PMID: 35667580 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave (MW) ablation as first-line locoregional therapy (LRT) for bridging patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study evaluated 88 patients who received percutaneous MW ablation for 141 tumors as first-line LRT for HCC and listed for liver transplantation at a single medical center between 2011 and 2019. Overall survival rate status-post liver transplant, waitlist retention and disease progression were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier techniques. RESULTS Of 88 patients (72M, 16F, mean age 60 years, MELD=11.2) listed for transplant, median waitlist time was 9.4 months (IQR: 5.5 - 18.9). Seventy-one patients (80.7%) received transplant after median wait time of 8.5 months. Seventeen patients (19.3%) were removed from the waitlist, four (4.5%) due to tumors outside of the Milan criteria (HCC-specific dropout). No difference in tumor size or AFP was seen in transplanted vs. non-transplanted patients at time of ablation (2.1 vs. 2.1 cm and 34.4 vs. 34.7 ng/mL for transplanted vs. non-transplanted, respectively, p>0.05). Five of 88 patients (5.1%) experienced adverse events after ablation; however, all recovered. There were no cases of tract seeding. The local tumor progression (LTP) rate was 7.2%. The overall survival status-post liver transplant at 5-years was 76.7% and the disease-specific survival after LT was 89.6% with a median follow-up of 61 months for all patients. CONCLUSION MW ablation appears to be safe and effective for bridging patients with HCC to liver transplant without waitlist removal from seeding, adverse events, or local tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily A Knott
- University of Wisconsin-Madison: Department of Radiology
| | - Annie M Zlevor
- University of Wisconsin-Madison: Department of Radiology
| | | | | | | | | | - Colin Longhurst
- Department of Carbone Cancer Center; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics
| | | | - J Louis Hinshaw
- University of Wisconsin-Madison: Department of Radiology; Department of Urology
| | | | - Paul F Laeseke
- University of Wisconsin-Madison: Department of Radiology
| | | | | | | | | | - Fred T Lee
- University of Wisconsin-Madison: Department of Radiology; Department of Urology; Department of Biomedical Engineering.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zane KE, Nagib PB, Jalil S, Mumtaz K, Makary MS. Emerging curative-intent minimally-invasive therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2022; 14:885-895. [PMID: 35721283 PMCID: PMC9157708 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of liver malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths universally. Cure can be achieved for early stage HCC, which is defined as 3 or fewer lesions less than or equal to 3 cm in the setting of Child-Pugh A or B and an ECOG of 0. Patients outside of these criteria who can be down-staged with loco-regional therapies to resection or liver transplantation (LT) also achieve curative outcomes. Traditionally, surgical resection, LT, and ablation are considered curative therapies for early HCC. However, results from recently conducted LEGACY study and DOSISPHERE trial demonstrate that transarterial radio-embolization has curative outcomes for early HCC, leading to its recent incorporation into the Barcelona clinic liver criteria guidelines for early HCC. This review is based on current evidence for curative-intent loco-regional therapies including radioembolization for early-stage HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie E Zane
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Paul B Nagib
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Sajid Jalil
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Khalid Mumtaz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Mina S Makary
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Benkö T, König J, Theysohn JM, Schotten C, Saner FH, Treckmann J, Radunz S. Bridging treatment prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization or transarterial chemoembolization? Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:74. [PMID: 35619164 PMCID: PMC9134704 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00708-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, intraarterial therapies are regularly employed as a bridge to liver transplantation to prevent tumor progression during waiting time. Objective of this study was to compare HCC recurrence after liver transplantation following TACE or radioembolization bridging treatment. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 131 consecutive HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2007 and December 2017 at our liver transplant center (radioembolization n = 44, TACE n = 87). Multivariable logistic regression and cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with tumor recurrence and post-transplant survival. RESULTS Between groups, patients were comparable with regards to age and gender. In the radioembolization group, Milan criteria for HCC were met significantly less frequently (20.5% vs. 65.5%, p < 0.0001). Patients in the radioembolization group required significantly fewer intraarterial treatments (1 [1-2] vs. 1 [1-7], p = 0.0007). On explant specimen, tumor differentiation, microvascular invasion and tumor necrosis were comparable between the groups. HCC recurrence and overall survival were similar between the groups. Multivariable analysis detected increasing recipient age, male gender, complete tumor necrosis and absence of microvascular invasion being independently associated with decreased odds for HCC recurrence. Increasing model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and tumor recurrence were independently associated with increased odds of post-transplant death. CONCLUSIONS Intraarterial bridging treatment leading to tumor necrosis may not only prevent waitlist drop-out but also facilitate long-term successful liver transplantation in HCC patients. Both radioembolization and TACE represent potent treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamás Benkö
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Julia König
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens M Theysohn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Schotten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Fuat H Saner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Treckmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sonia Radunz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Vietti Violi N, Gnerre J, Law A, Hectors S, Bane O, Doucette J, Abboud G, Kim E, Schwartz M, Fiel MI, Taouli B. Assessment of HCC response to Yttrium-90 radioembolization with gadoxetate disodium MRI: correlation with histopathology. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6493-6503. [PMID: 35380226 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08732-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Transarterial 90Y radioembolization (TARE) is increasingly being used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. However, tumor response assessment after TARE may be challenging. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of gadoxetate disodium MRI for predicting complete pathologic necrosis (CPN) of HCC treated with TARE, using histopathology as the reference standard. METHODS This retrospective study included 48 patients (M/F: 36/12, mean age: 62 years) with HCC treated by TARE followed by surgery with gadoxetate disodium MRI within 90 days of surgery. Two radiologists evaluated tumor response using RECIST1.1, mRECIST, EASL, and LI-RADS-TR criteria and evaluated the percentage of necrosis on subtraction during late arterial, portal venous, and hepatobiliary phases (AP/PVP/HBP). Statistical analysis included inter-reader agreement, correlation between radiologic and pathologic percentage of necrosis, and prediction of CPN using logistic regression and ROC analyses. RESULTS Histopathology demonstrated 71 HCCs (2.8 ± 1.7 cm, range: 0.5-7.5 cm) including 42 with CPN, 22 with partial necrosis, and 7 without necrosis. EASL and percentage of tumor necrosis on subtraction at the AP/PVP were independent predictors of CPN (p = 0.02-0.03). Percentage of necrosis, mRECIST, EASL, and LI-RADS-TR had fair to good performance for diagnosing CPN (AUCs: 0.78 - 0.83), with a significant difference between subtraction and LI-RADS-TR for reader 2, and in specificity between subtraction and other criteria for both readers (p-range: 0.01-0.04). Radiologic percentage of necrosis was significantly correlated to histopathologic degree of tumor necrosis (r = 0.66 - 0.8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Percentage of tumor necrosis on subtraction and EASL criteria were significant independent predictors of CPN in HCC treated with TARE. Image subtraction should be considered for assessing HCC response to TARE when using MRI. KEY POINTS • Percentage of tumor necrosis on image subtraction and EASL criteria are significant independent predictors of complete pathologic necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with90Y radioembolization. • Subtraction, mRECIST, EASL, and LI-RADS-TR have fair to good performance for diagnosing complete pathologic necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with90Y radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naik Vietti Violi
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey Gnerre
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Amy Law
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Stefanie Hectors
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Octavia Bane
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Doucette
- Department of Environmental Medicine & Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghadi Abboud
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward Kim
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Myron Schwartz
- The Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Isabel Fiel
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sun HC, Zhou J, Wang Z, Liu X, Xie Q, Jia W, Zhao M, Bi X, Li G, Bai X, Ji Y, Xu L, Zhu XD, Bai D, Chen Y, Chen Y, Dai C, Guo R, Guo W, Hao C, Huang T, Huang Z, Li D, Li G, Li T, Li X, Li G, Liang X, Liu J, Liu F, Lu S, Lu Z, Lv W, Mao Y, Shao G, Shi Y, Song T, Tan G, Tang Y, Tao K, Wan C, Wang G, Wang L, Wang S, Wen T, Xing B, Xiang B, Yan S, Yang D, Yin G, Yin T, Yin Z, Yu Z, Zhang B, Zhang J, Zhang S, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang A, Zhao H, Zhou L, Zhang W, Zhu Z, Qin S, Shen F, Cai X, Teng G, Cai J, Chen M, Li Q, Liu L, Wang W, Liang T, Dong J, Chen X, Wang X, Zheng S, Fan J. Chinese expert consensus on conversion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (2021 edition). Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:227-252. [PMID: 35464283 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in systemic and locoregional treatments for patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have resulted in improved response rates. This has provided an opportunity for selected patients with initially unresectable HCC to achieve adequate tumor downstaging to undergo surgical resection, a 'conversion therapy' strategy. However, conversion therapy is a new approach to the treatment of HCC and its practice and treatment protocols are still being developed. Review the evidence for conversion therapy in HCC and develop consensus statements to guide clinical practice. Evidence review: Many research centers in China have accumulated significant experience implementing HCC conversion therapy. Preliminary findings and data have shown that conversion therapy represents an important strategy to maximize the survival of selected patients with intermediate stage to advanced HCC; however, there are still many urgent clinical and scientific challenges for this therapeutic strategy and its related fields. In order to summarize and learn from past experience and review current challenges, the Chinese Expert Consensus on Conversion Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2021 Edition) was developed based on a review of preliminary experience and clinical data from Chinese and non-Chinese studies in this field and combined with recommendations for clinical practice. Sixteen consensus statements on the implementation of conversion therapy for HCC were developed. The statements generated in this review are based on a review of clinical evidence and real clinical experience and will help guide future progress in conversion therapy for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Chuan Sun
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology of PLA Cancer Center, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Qing Xie
- Department of Infectious Disease, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Jia
- Department of Liver Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinyu Bi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Gong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Zhu
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dousheng Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Yajin Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongjun Chen
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaoliu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Rongping Guo
- The Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenzhi Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Chunyi Hao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Sarcoma Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Huang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Deyu Li
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of general surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiangcheng Li
- Department of Liver Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Guangming Li
- Center of General Surgery, Beijing YouAn Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jingfeng Liu
- The United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fubao Liu
- Division of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Shichun Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Lu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College Bengbu, China
| | - Weifu Lv
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Yilei Mao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS), Beijing, China
| | - Guoliang Shao
- Department of Intervention, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yinghong Shi
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianqiang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Guang Tan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yunqiang Tang
- Department of Hepatic-Biliary Surgery, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kaishan Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Chidan Wan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guangyi Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Liver Surgery Department, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shunxiang Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Tianfu Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation Centre, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Baocai Xing
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Bangde Xiang
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Center, Key Laboratory for High-Incidence Tumor Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Sheng Yan
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dinghua Yang
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guowen Yin
- Department of Intervention, Cancer Hospital of Jiangsu, Nanjing, China
| | - Tao Yin
- Department of Hepatic & Biliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Hubei Cancer Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhenyu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Xiamen, China
| | - Zhengping Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Bixiang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jialin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shuijun Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Digestive Organ Transplantation of Henan Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yamin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yubao Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Aibin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ledu Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wu Zhang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang Province, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Zhu
- Hepatoliliary Surgery Center, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Qinhuai Medical Area, Eastern Theater General Hospital of PLA China, Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatic Surgery IV, the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gaojun Teng
- Center of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Lianxin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Changping, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xuehao Wang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dhondt E, Lambert B, Hermie L, Huyck L, Vanlangenhove P, Geerts A, Verhelst X, Aerts M, Vanlander A, Berrevoet F, Troisi RI, Van Vlierberghe H, Defreyne L. 90Y Radioembolization versus Drug-eluting Bead Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results from the TRACE Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial. Radiology 2022; 303:699-710. [PMID: 35258371 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the recommended treatment for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines. Prospective uncontrolled studies suggest that yttrium 90 (90Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a safe and effective alternative. Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of TARE with TACE for unresectable HCC. Materials and Methods In this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial (TRACE), 90Y glass TARE was compared with doxorubicin drug-eluting bead (DEB) TACE in participants with intermediate-stage HCC, extended to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 and those with early-stage HCC not eligible for surgery or thermoablation. Participants were recruited between September 2011 and March 2018. The primary end point was time to overall tumor progression (TTP) (Kaplan-Meier analysis) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) groups. Results At interim analysis, 38 participants (median age, 67 years; IQR, 63-72 years; 33 men) were randomized to the TARE arm and 34 (median age, 68 years; IQR, 61-71 years; 30 men) to the DEB-TACE arm (ITT group). Median TTP was 17.1 months in the TARE arm versus 9.5 months in the DEB-TACE arm (ITT group hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.70; P = .002) (PP group, 32 and 34 participants, respectively, in each arm; HR, 0.29; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.60; P < .001). Median overall survival was 30.2 months after TARE and 15.6 months after DEB-TACE (ITT group HR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.82; P = .006). Serious adverse events grade 3 or higher (13 of 33 participants [39%] vs 19 of 36 [53%] after TARE and DEB-TACE, respectively; P = .47) and 30-day mortality (0 of 33 participants [0%] vs three of 36 [8.3%]; P = .24) were similar in the safety groups. At the interim, the HR for the primary end point, TTP, was less than 0.39, meeting the criteria to halt the study. Conclusion With similar safety profile, yttrium 90 radioembolization conferred superior tumor control and survival compared with chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads in selected participants with early or intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01381211 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Dhondt
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bieke Lambert
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Laurens Hermie
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lynn Huyck
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Vanlangenhove
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anja Geerts
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Xavier Verhelst
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maridi Aerts
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Aude Vanlander
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Frederik Berrevoet
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hans Van Vlierberghe
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Luc Defreyne
- From the Departments of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (E.D., L. Hermie, L. Huyck, P.V., L.D.), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (A.G., X.V., M.A., H.V.V.), and General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation (A.V., F.B.), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; and the Departments of Diagnostic Sciences (B.L.) and Human Structure and Repair (R.I.T.), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Aliseda D, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, Benito A, Lopez-Olaondo L, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Bilbao JI, Hidalgo F, Iñarrairaegui M, Ciria R, Pardo F, Sangro B, Rotellar F. Pure laparoscopic major liver resection after yttrium 90 radioembolization: a case-matched series analysis of feasibility and outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1099-1111. [PMID: 35229168 PMCID: PMC9151566 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Liver surgery after radioembolization (RE) entails highly demanding and challenging procedures due to the frequent combination of large tumors, severe RE-related adhesions, and the necessity of conducting major hepatectomies. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and its associated advantages could provide benefits, as yet unreported, to these patients. The current study evaluated feasibility, morbidity, mortality, and survival outcomes for major laparoscopic liver resection after radioembolization. Material and methods In this retrospective, single-center study patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing major laparoscopic hepatectomy after RE were identified from institutional databases. They were matched (1:2) on several pre-operative characteristics to a group of patients that underwent major LLR for the same malignancies during the same period but without previous RE. Results From March 2011 to November 2020, 9 patients underwent a major LLR after RE. No differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 150 ml; p = 0.621), operative time (478 vs. 407 min; p = 0.135) or pedicle clamping time (90.5 vs 74 min; p = 0.133) between the post-RE LLR and the matched group. Similarly, no differences were observed on hospital stay (median 3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.300), Clavien–Dindo ≥ III complications (2 vs. 1 cases; p = 0.250), specific liver morbidity (1 vs. 1 case p = 1.000), or 90 day mortality (0 vs. 0; p = 1.000). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach for post radioembolization patients may be a feasible and safe procedure with excellent surgical and oncological outcomes and meets the current standards for laparoscopic liver resections. Further studies with larger series are needed to confirm the results herein presented. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aliseda
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Martí-Cruchaga
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gabriel Zozaya
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis Lopez-Olaondo
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Anesthesiology Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I Bilbao
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Francisco Hidalgo
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Anesthesiology Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rubén Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Fernando Pardo
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. .,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wen N, Cai Y, Li F, Ye H, Tang W, Song P, Cheng N. The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide: A concise review and comparison of current guidelines: 2022 update. Biosci Trends 2022; 16:20-30. [PMID: 35197399 DOI: 10.5582/bst.2022.01061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. This review is an updated version that summarizes comprehensive guidelines published from January 2001 to January 2022 worldwide with a focus on the clinical management of HCC. The electronic databases MEDLINE, the Chinese SinoMed, and the Japanese CiNii were systematically searched. A total of 22 characteristic guidelines for HCC management were ultimately included, including 1 international guideline, 11 guidelines from Asia, 5 from Europe, 4 from the America, and 1 from Australia. If guidelines were published in multiple versions, the most recent update was included, and surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment were compared. The composition of and recommendations in current guidelines on HCC varied, so these guidelines were regrouped and diagnostic and treatment algorithms were summarized graphically to provide the latest information to clinicians. The diagnostic criteria were grouped into 2 categories: a "Size-based pathway" and a "Non-size-based pathway". The treatment criteria were summarized according to different treatment algorithms, and mainstream treatment options were reviewed. Findings from comparison of current guidelines might help target and concentrate efforts to improve the clinical management of HCC. However, further studies are needed to improve the management and outcomes of HCC. More straightforward or refined guidelines would help guide doctors to make better decisions in the treatment of HCC in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ningyuan Wen
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yulong Cai
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Fuyu Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hui Ye
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Wei Tang
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.,International Health Care Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peipei Song
- Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nansheng Cheng
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|