Decay accelerating factor is essential for successful corneal engraftment

Complement decay-accelerating factor inhibits inflammation-induced myopia development

Myopia is regarded as a worldwide epidemic ocular disease, has been proved related to inflammation. CD55, also known as decay-accelerating factor (DAF) can modulate the activation of complement through inhibiting the formation of complement 3 convertase and its dysregulation is involved in various inflammatory diseases. To investigate the association between CD55 and myopia, and to test whether CD55 can inhibit myopia development by suppressing inflammation in the eye, we use three different animal models including monocular form-deprivation myopia, myopia induced by TNF-α administration and allergic conjunctivitis animal model to reveal the CD55 in myopia development. The tears of thirty-eight participants with different spherical equivalents were collected and CD55 in the tears were also analyzed. Complement 3 and complement 5 levels increased while CD55 levels decreased in allergic conjunctivitis and myopic eyes. After anti-inflammatory drugs administration, CD55 expression was increased in monocular form-deprivation myopia model. We also found inflammatory cytokines TGF-β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β may enhance complement 3 and complement 5 activation while CD55 level was suppressed contrary. Moreover, lower CD55 levels were found in the tears of patients with myopia with decreased diopter values. Finally, CD55-Fc administration on the eyelids can inhibit the elongation of axial length and change of refractive error. CD55-Fc application also suppress myopia development subsequent to complement 3 and complement 5 reduction and can lower myopia-specific (MMP-2 and TGF-β) cytokine expression in TNF-α induced myopia animal model. This suggests that CD55 can inhibit myopia development by suppression of complement activation and eventual down-regulation of inflammation.

A Review on the Immunomodulatory Mechanism of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a high prevalence and canceration rate. The immune disorder is one of the recognized mechanisms. Acupuncture is widely used to treat patients with IBD. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have proven the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of IBD, and some progress has been made in the mechanism. In this paper, we reviewed the studies related to acupuncture for IBD and focused on the immunomodulatory mechanism. We found that acupuncture could regulate the innate and adaptive immunity of IBD patients in many ways. Acupuncture exerts innate immunomodulatory effects by regulating intestinal epithelial barrier, toll-like receptors, NLRP3 inflammasomes, oxidative stress, and endoplasmic reticulum stress and exerts adaptive immunomodulation by regulating the balance of Th17/Treg and Th1/Th2 cells. In addition, acupuncture can also regulate intestinal flora.

Combined blockade of complement C5 and TLR co-receptor CD14 synergistically inhibits pig-to-human corneal xenograft induced innate inflammatory responses

Inadequate supplies of donor corneas have evoked an escalating interest in corneal xenotransplantation. However, innate immune responses contribute significantly to the mechanism of xenograft rejection. We hypothesized that complement component C5 and TLR co-receptor CD14 inhibition would inhibit porcine cornea induced innate immune responses. Therefore, we measured cytokine release in human blood, induced by three forms of corneal xenografts with or without inhibitors. Native porcine cornea (NPC) induced interleukins (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1ra), chemokines (MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β) and other cytokines (TNF, G-CSF, INF-γ, FGF-basic). Decellularized (DPC) and gamma-irradiated cornea (g-DPC) elevated the release of those cytokines. C5-blockade by eculizumab inhibited all the cytokines except G-CSF when induced by NPC. However, C5-blockade failed to reduce DPC and g-DPC induced cytokines. Blockade of CD14 inhibited DPC-induced cytokines except for IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and G-CSF, while it inhibited all of them when induced by g-DPC. Combined blockade of C5 and CD14 inhibited the maximum number of cytokines regardless of the xenograft type. Finally, by using the TLR4 specific inhibitor Eritoran, we showed that TLR4 activation was the basis for the CD14 effect. Thus, blockade of C5, when combined with TLR4 inhibition, may have therapeutic potential in pig-to-human corneal xenotransplantation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Bio-engineered corneal xenografts are on the verge of becoming a viable alternative to allogenic human-donor-cornea, but the host's innate immune response is still a critical barrier for graft acceptance. By overruling this barrier, limited graft availability would no longer be an issue for treating corneal diseases. We showed that the xenograft induced inflammation is initiated by the complement system and toll-like receptor activation. Intriguingly, the inflammatory response was efficiently blocked by simultaneously targeting bottleneck molecules in the complement system (C5) and the TLR co-receptor CD14 with pharmaceutical inhibitors. We postulate that a combination of C5 and CD14 inhibition could have a great therapeutic potential to overcome the immunologic barrier in pig-to-human corneal xenotransplantation.

The cornea IV immunology, infection, neovascularization, and surgery chapter 1: Corneal immunology

PURPOSE

of Review: This review offers an informed and up-to-date insight on the immune profile of the cornea and the factors that govern the regulation of such a unique immune environment.

SUMMARY

The cornea is a unique tissue that performs the specialized task of allowing light to penetrate for visual interpretation. To accomplish this, the ocular surface requires a distinct immune environment that is achieved through unique structural, cellular and molecular factors. Not only must the cornea be able to fend off invasive infectious agents but also control the inflammatory response as to avoid collateral, and potentially blinding damage; particularly of post-mitotic cells such as the corneal endothelium. To combat infections, both innate and adaptive arms of the inflammatory immune response are at play in the cornea. Dendritic cells play a critical role in coordinating both these responses in order to fend off infections. On the other side of the spectrum, the ocular surface is also endowed with a variety of anatomic and physiologic components that aid in regulating the immune response to prevent excessive, potentially damaging, inflammation. This attenuation of the immune response is termed immune privilege. The balance between pro and anti-inflammatory reactions is key for preservation of the functional integrity of the cornea.

RECENT FINDINGS

The understanding of the molecular and cellular factors governing corneal immunology and its response to antigens is a growing field. Dendritic cells in the normal cornea play a crucial role in combating infections and coordinating the inflammatory arms of the immune response, particularly through coordination with T-helper cells. The role of neuropeptides is recently becoming more highlighted with different factors working on both sides of the inflammatory balance.

Animal models of high-risk corneal transplantation: A comprehensive review

Over the past century, corneal transplantation has become the most commonly performed allogeneic solid tissue transplantation. Although more than 80% of the corneal transplantations have favorable outcomes, immune-mediated rejection continues to be the major cause of failure in well over 50% of graft recipients that have inflamed and vascularized host beds. Over the past two decades, the progress in our understanding of the immunological pathways that mediate graft rejection has aided in the development of novel therapeutic strategies. In order to successfully test the efficacy of these interventions, it is essential to model the immunological processes occurring as a consequence of corneal transplantation. Herein, we have comprehensively reviewed the established animal models used for replicating the immunopathological processes causing graft rejection in high-risk corneal transplantation settings. We have also discussed the practical and technical differences, as well as biological and immunological variations in different animal models.

Absence of recipient C3aR1 signaling limits expansion and differentiation of alloreactive CD8+ T cell immunity and prolongs murine cardiac allograft survival

Activation, differentiation, and expansion of alloreactive CD8⁺ T cells, the dominant effectors that mediate murine heart allograft rejection, requires allorecognition, costimulation, and cytokine-initiated signals. While previous work showed that alloreactive CD4⁺ T cell immunity entails immune cell-produced and locally activated complement, whether and how C3a receptor 1 (C3aR1) signaling impacts transplant outcomes and the mechanisms linking C3aR1 to alloreactive CD8⁺ T cell activation/expansion remain unclear. Herein we show that recipient C3aR1 deficiency or pharmacological C3aR1 blockade synergizes with tacrolimus to significantly prolong allograft survival versus tacrolimus-treated controls (median survival time 21 vs. 14 days, P < .05). Recipient C3aR1-deficiency reduced the frequencies of posttransplant, donor-reactive CD8⁺ T cells twofold. Reciprocal adoptive transfers of naive WT or C3ar1^-/- CD8⁺ T cells into syngeneic WT or C3ar1^-/- allograft recipients showed that T cell-expressed C3aR1 induces CD8⁺ T proliferation, mTOR activation and transcription factor T-bet expression. Host C3aR1 indirectly facilitates alloreactive CD8⁺ T cell proliferation/expansion by amplifying antigen presenting cell costimulatory molecule expression and innate cytokine production. In addition to expanding mechanistic insight, our findings identify C3aR1 as a testable therapeutic target for future studies aimed at improving human transplant outcomes.

CD55 Is Essential for CD103+ Dendritic Cell Tolerogenic Responses that Protect against Autoimmunity

Recent studies traced inflammatory bowel disease in some patients to deficiency of CD55 [decay-accelerating factor (DAF)], but the mechanism underlying the linkage remained unclear. Herein, we studied the importance of DAF in enabling processes that program tolerance in the gut and the eye, two immune-privileged sites where immunosuppressive responses are continuously elicited. Unlike oral feeding or ocular injection of ovalbumin in wild-type (WT) mice, which induced dominant immune tolerance, identical treatment of DAF^-/- mice or DAF^-/- to WT bone marrow chimeras did not. While 10% to 30% of mesenteric and submandibular lymph node CD4⁺ cells became robust T-regulatory cells (Tregs) in WT forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)-green fluorescent protein mice, few in either site became Tregs with little suppressor activity in DAF^-/- Foxp3-green fluorescent protein mice. Phenotyping of CD103⁺ dendritic cells (DCs) from the ovalbumin-fed DAF^-/- mice showed impaired expression of inducer of costimulation (ICOS) ligand, programmed death receptor 1-ligand 1 (PD1-L1), CxxxC chemokine receptor 1 (Cx3CR1), CCR7, and CCR9. Analyses of elicited DAF^-/- Foxp3⁺ Tregs showed reduced expression of interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF-8)/aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member A2 (Aldh1a2) and glycoprotein A repetitions predominant/latency-associated protein associated with Treg transforming growth factor-β production and presentation, as well as integrin β6/integrin β8 associated with Treg and CD103⁺ DC transforming growth factor-β release. Thus, DAF is required for the properties of CD103⁺ DCs and their naïve CD4⁺ cell partners that together program tolerance.

C5aR1 regulates migration of suppressive myeloid cells required for costimulatory blockade-induced murine allograft survival

Costimulatory blockade-induced murine cardiac allograft survival requires intragraft accumulation of CD11b⁺ Ly6C^lo Ly6G^- regulatory myeloid cells (Mregs) that expand regulatory T cells (Tregs) and suppress effector T cells (Teffs). We previously showed that C5a receptor (C5aR1) signaling on T cells activates Teffs and inhibits Tregs, but whether and/or how C5aR1 affects Mregs required for transplant survival is unknown. Although BALB/c hearts survived >60 days in anti-CD154 (MR1)-treated or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4)-Ig-treated wild-type (WT) recipients, they were rejected at ~30 days in MR1-treated or CTLA4-Ig-treated recipients selectively deficient in C5aR1 restricted to myeloid cells (C5ar1^fl/fl xLysM-Cre). This accelerated rejection was associated with ~2-fold more donor-reactive T cells and ~40% less expansion of donor-reactive Tregs. Analysis of graft-infiltrating mononuclear cells on posttransplant day 6 revealed fewer Ly6C^lo monocytes in C5ar1^fl/fl xLysM-Cre recipients. Expression profiling of intragraft Ly6C^lo monocytes showed that C5aR1 deficiency downregulated genes related to migration/locomotion without changes in genes associated with suppressive function. Cotransfer of C5ar1^fl/fl and C5ar1^fl/fl xLysM-Cre myeloid cells into MR1-treated allograft recipients resulted in less accumulation of C5ar1^-/- cells within the allografts, and in vitro assays confirmed that Ly6C^hi myeloid cells migrate to C5a/C5aR1-initiated signals. Together, our results newly link myeloid cell-expressed C5aR1 to intragraft accumulation of myeloid cells required for prolongation of heart transplant survival induced by costimulatory blockade.

Antibody Subclass Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation

Long-term outcomes in solid organ transplantation are constrained by the development of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and other targets, which elicit antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, antibody-mediated graft injury represents a broad continuum, from extensive complement activation and tissue damage compromising the function of the transplanted organ, to histological manifestations of endothelial cell injury and mononuclear cell infiltration but without concurrent allograft dysfunction. In addition, while transplant recipients with DSA as a whole fare worse than those without, a substantial minority of patients with DSA do not experience poorer graft outcome. Taken together, these observations suggest that not all DSA are equally pathogenic. Antibody effector functions are controlled by a number of factors, including antibody concentration, antigen availability, and antibody isotype/subclass. Antibody isotype is specified by many integrated signals, including the antigen itself as well as from antigen-presenting cells or helper T cells. To date, a number of studies have described the repertoire of IgG subclasses directed against HLA in pretransplant patients and evaluated the clinical impact of different DSA IgG subclasses on allograft outcome. This review will summarize what is known about the repertoire of antibodies to HLA and non-HLA targets in transplantation, focusing on the distribution of IgG subclasses, as well as the general biology, etiology, and mechanisms of injury of different humoral factors.

High-risk corneal allografts: A therapeutic challenge

Corneal transplantation is the most common surgical procedure amongst solid organ transplants with a high survival rate of 86% at 1-year post-grafting. This high success rate has been attributed to the immune privilege of the eye. However, mechanisms originally thought to promote immune privilege, such as the lack of antigen presenting cells and vessels in the cornea, are challenged by recent studies. Nevertheless, the immunological and physiological features of the cornea promoting a relatively weak alloimmune response is likely responsible for the high survival rate in “low-risk” settings. Furthermore, although corneal graft survival in “low-risk” recipients is favourable, the prognosis in “high-risk” recipients for corneal graft is poor. In “high-risk” grafts, the process of indirect allorecognition is accelerated by the enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses due to pre-existing inflammation and neovascularization of the host bed. This leads to the irreversible rejection of the allograft and ultimately graft failure. Many therapeutic measures are being tested in pre-clinical and clinical studies to counter the immunological challenge of “high-risk” recipients. Despite the prevailing dogma, recent data suggest that tissue matching together with use of systemic immunosuppression may increase the likelihood of graft acceptance in “high-risk” recipients. However, immunosuppressive drugs are accompanied with intolerance/side effects and toxicity, and therefore, novel cell-based therapies are in development which target host immune cells and restore immune homeostasis without significant side effect of treatment. In addition, developments in regenerative medicine may be able to solve both important short comings of allotransplantation: (1) graft rejection and ultimate graft failure; and (2) the lack of suitable donor corneas. The advances in technology and research indicate that wider therapeutic choices for patients may be available to address the worldwide problem of corneal blindness in both “low-risk” and “high-risk” hosts.

Corneal Immunosuppressive Mechanisms, Anterior Chamber-Associated Immune Deviation (ACAID) and Their Role in Allograft Rejection

Corneal transplantation is the most frequently performed transplant procedure in humans. Human leukocyte antigen matching, while imperative for other types of organ transplants, is usually not performed before cornea transplantation. With the use of topical steroid immunosuppressants, which are subsequently tailed off to almost zero, most corneal transplants will not be rejected in recipients with low risk of graft rejection. This phenomenon has been described as immune privilege by Medawar many years ago. However, this immune privilege is relative and can be easily eroded, e.g. by postoperative nonspecific inflammation or other causes of corneal or ocular inflammation. Interestingly, corneas that are at high risk of rejection have a higher failure rate than other organs. Considerable progress has been made in recent years to provide a better understanding of corneal immune privilege. This chapter will review current knowledge on ocular immunosuppressive mechanisms including anterior chamber-associated immune deviation and discuss their role(s) in corneal allograft rejection. Ultimately, this evolving information will be of benefit in developing therapeutic strategies to prevent corneal transplant rejection.

Control of innate immunological mechanisms as a route to drug minimization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Much research in transplantation focuses on treatments for rejection and induction of tolerance. Recent evidence has shown that initial inflammation induced by innate immune effectors after transplantation has a key role in modulating adaptive immune responses that cause organ rejection. Here, we describe the role of the innate immune system, particularly the complement activation pathways, and how they influence adaptive immune responses post-transplantation and current strategies, which are under development to block these innate pathways.

RECENT FINDINGS

Anaphylatoxins and their respective receptors are proving to be important in T-cell-mediated immunity and make attractive targets for therapies designed to promote tolerance in solid organ transplantation. Additionally, regulators of complement activation are currently being tested in clinical trials, with improvements in drug delivery.

SUMMARY

Preventing ischaemia-reperfusion injury in transplanted organs significantly reduces immune activation and promotes graft survival. Research into the mechanisms of complement activation in both native organ ischaemia and transplantation models detail emerging roles for complement intermediates that can serve as targets for intervention, with the aim of reducing early post-transplant inflammation, reducing the intensity of immunosuppressive regimens, leading to prolonged graft survival.

Molecules Great and Small: The Complement System

The complement cascade, traditionally considered an effector arm of innate immunity required for host defense against pathogens, is now recognized as a crucial pathogenic mediator of various kidney diseases. Complement components produced by the liver and circulating in the plasma undergo activation through the classical and/or mannose-binding lectin pathways to mediate anti-HLA antibody-initiated kidney transplant rejection and autoantibody-initiated GN, the latter including membranous glomerulopathy, antiglomerular basement membrane disease, and lupus nephritis. Inherited and/or acquired abnormalities of complement regulators, which requisitely limit restraint on alternative pathway complement activation, contribute to the pathogenesis of the C3 nephropathies and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Increasing evidence links complement produced by endothelial cells and/or tubular cells to the pathogenesis of kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury and progressive kidney fibrosis. Data emerging since the mid-2000s additionally show that immune cells, including T cells and antigen-presenting cells, produce alternative pathway complement components during cognate interactions. The subsequent local complement activation yields production of the anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, which bind to their respective receptors (C3aR and C5aR) on both partners to augment effector T-cell proliferation and survival, while simultaneously inhibiting regulatory T-cell induction and function. This immune cell-derived complement enhances pathogenic alloreactive T-cell immunity that results in transplant rejection and likely contributes to the pathogenesis of other T cell-mediated kidney diseases. C5a/C5aR ligations on neutrophils have additionally been shown to contribute to vascular inflammation in models of ANCA-mediated renal vasculitis. New translational immunology efforts along with the development of pharmacologic agents that block human complement components and receptors now permit testing of the intriguing concept that targeting complement in patients with an assortment of kidney diseases has the potential to abrogate disease progression and improve patient health.

Immunology of Corneal Allografts: Insights from Animal Models

Corneal transplantation stands alone as the most common and successful form of solid organ transplantation. Even though HLA matching and systemic antirejection drugs are not routinely used, 90% of the first time corneal allografts will succeed. By contrast, all other major categories of organ transplantation require HLA matching and the use of systemically administered immunosuppressive drugs. This remarkable success of corneal transplants under these conditions is an example of "immune privilege" and is the primary reason for the extraordinary success of corneal transplantation. A number of dogmas have emerged over the past century to explain immune privilege and the immunobiology of corneal transplantation. Many of these dogmas have been based largely on inferences from clinical observations on keratoplasty patients. The past 30 years have witnessed a wealth of rodent studies on corneal transplantation that have tested hypotheses and dogmas that originated from clinical observations on penetrating keratoplasty patients. Rodent models allow the application of highly sophisticated genetic and immunological tools for testing these hypotheses in a controlled environment and with experiments designed prospectively. These studies have validated some of the widely held assumptions based on clinical observations and in other cases, previous dogmas have been replaced with new insights that could only come from prospective studies performed under highly controlled conditions. This review highlights some of the key dogmas and these widely held assumptions that have been scrutinized through the use of rodent models of penetrating keratoplasty. This review also makes note of new immunological principles of corneal immunology that have emerged from rodent studies on corneal transplantation that most likely would not have been revealed in studies on corneal transplantation patients.

Complement regulation of T-cell alloimmunity

Complement proteins are generated both by the liver (systemic compartment) and by peripheral tissue-resident cells and migratory immune cells (local compartment). The immune cell-derived, alternative pathway complement components activate spontaneously, yielding local, but not systemic, production of C3a and C5a. These anaphylatoxins bind to their respective G-protein-coupled receptors, the C3a receptor and the C5a receptor, expressed on T cells and antigen-presenting cells, leading to their reciprocal activation and driving T-cell differentiation, expansion, and survival. Complement deficiency or blockade attenuates T-cell-mediated autoimmunity and delays allograft rejection in mice. Increasing complement activation, achieved by genetic removal of the complement regulatory protein decay accelerating factor, enhances murine T-cell immunity and accelerates allograft rejection. Signaling through the C3a receptor and the C5a receptor reduces suppressive activity of natural regulatory T cells and the generation and stability of induced regulatory T cells. The concepts, initially generated in mice, recently were confirmed in human immune cells, supporting the need for testing of complement targeting therapies in organ transplants patients.

Complement as a multifaceted modulator of kidney transplant injury

Improvements in clinical care and immunosuppressive medications have positively affected outcomes following kidney transplantation, but graft survival remains suboptimal, with half-lives of approximately 11 years. Late graft loss results from a confluence of processes initiated by ischemia-reperfusion injury and compounded by effector mechanisms of uncontrolled alloreactive T cells and anti-HLA antibodies. When combined with immunosuppressant toxicity, post-transplant diabetes and hypertension, and recurrent disease, among other factors, the result is interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and graft failure. Emerging evidence over the last decade unexpectedly identified the complement cascade as a common thread in this process. Complement activation and function affects allograft injury at essentially every step. These fundamental new insights, summarized herein, provide the foundation for testing the efficacy of various complement antagonists to improve kidney transplant function and long-term graft survival.

Corneal transplantation and immune privilege

Corneal transplants have been successfully performed in human subjects for over 100 years and enjoy an immune privilege that is unrivaled in the field of transplantation. Immune privilege is defined as the reduced incidence and tempo in the immune rejection of corneal allografts compared to other categories of organ allografts performed under the same conditions. Skin allografts transplanted across various MHC or minor histocompatibility barriers undergo rejection in approximately 100% of the hosts. By contrast, orthotopic corneal allografts experience long-term survival in 50% to >90% of the hosts, depending on the histocompatibility barriers that confront the host. The capacity of corneal allografts to evade immune rejection is attributable to multiple anatomical, physiological and immunoregulatory conditions that conspire to prevent the induction and expression of alloimmunity.

Complement regulation of T cell immunity

Results of studies published since 2002 reveal that T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) produce complement proteins. The immune cell-derived, alternative pathway complement components activate spontaneously, yielding local, but not systemic, production of C3a and C5a. These anaphylatoxins bind to their respective G-protein-coupled receptors, C3aR and C5aR, expressed on both partners. The resultant complement-induced T cell activation and APC activation drive T cell differentiation, expansion and survival. Complement deficiency or blockade attenuates T cell-mediated autoimmunity and delays allograft rejection in mice. Increasing complement activation, achieved by genetic removal of the complement regulatory protein decay-accelerating factor, enhances murine T cell immunity and accelerates allograft rejection. The findings support the need for design and testing of complement inhibitors in humans.

Good news-bad news: the Yin and Yang of immune privilege in the eye

The eye and the brain are prototypical tissues manifesting immune privilege (IP) in which immune responses to foreign antigens, particularly alloantigens are suppressed, and even completely inhibited. Explanations for this phenomenon are numerous and mostly reflect our evolving understanding of the molecular and cellular processes underpinning immunological responses generally. IP is now viewed as a property of many tissues and the level of expression of IP varies not only with the tissue but with the nature of the foreign antigen and changes in the limited conditions under which privilege can operate as a mechanism of immunological tolerance. As a result, IP functions normally as a homeostatic mechanism preserving normal function in tissues, particularly those with highly specialized function and limited capacity for renewal such as the eye and brain. However, IP is relatively easily bypassed in the face of a sufficiently strong immunological response, and the privileged tissues may be at greater risk of collateral damage because its natural defenses are more easily breached than in a fully immunocompetent tissue which rapidly rejects foreign antigen and restores integrity. This two-edged sword cuts its swathe through the eye: under most circumstances, IP mechanisms such as blood-ocular barriers, intraocular immune modulators, induction of T regulatory cells, lack of lymphatics, and other properties maintain tissue integrity; however, when these are breached, various degrees of tissue damage occur from severe tissue destruction in retinal viral infections and other forms of uveoretinal inflammation, to less severe inflammatory responses in conditions such as macular degeneration. Conversely, ocular IP and tumor-related IP can combine to permit extensive tumor growth and increased risk of metastasis thus threatening the survival of the host.

Immunoprotective properties of primary Sertoli cells in mice: potential functional pathways that confer immune privilege

Primary Sertoli cells isolated from mouse testes survive when transplanted across immunological barriers and protect cotransplanted allogeneic and xenogeneic cells from rejection in rodent models. In contrast, the mouse Sertoli cell line (MSC-1) lacks immunoprotective properties associated with primary Sertoli cells. In this study, enriched primary Sertoli cells or MSC-1 cells were transplanted as allografts into the renal subcapsular area of naive BALB/c mice, and their survival in graft sites was compared. While Sertoli cells were detected within the grafts with 100% graft survival throughout the 20-day study, MSC-1 cells were rejected between 11 and 14 days, with 0% graft survival at 20 days posttransplantation. Nonetheless, the mechanism for primary Sertoli cell survival and immunoprotection remains unresolved. To identify immune factors or functional pathways potentially responsible for immune privilege, gene expression profiles of enriched primary Sertoli cells were compared with those of MSC-1 cells. Microarray analysis identified 2369 genes in enriched primary Sertoli cells that were differentially expressed at ±4-fold or higher levels than in MSC-1 cells. Ontological analyses identified multiple immune pathways, which were used to generate a list of 340 immune-related genes. Three functions were identified in primary Sertoli cells as potentially important for establishing immune privilege: suppression of inflammation by specific cytokines and prostanoid molecules, slowing of leukocyte migration by controlled cell junctions and actin polymerization, and inhibition of complement activation and membrane-associated cell lysis. These results increase our understanding of testicular immune privilege and, in the long-term, could lead to improvements in transplantation success.

Immune tolerance and autoimmune uveoretinitis: the role of the ocular microenvironment

Two major self-antigens, S-antigen and interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein, which can induce uveoretinitis, exist in the eye. However, immunologic tolerance to these self-antigens is generated and maintained. Two major mechanisms have been demonstrated by which tolerance to tissue-specific self-antigens is maintained. One is central tolerance in the thymus where autoreactive T cells are deleted by medullary thymic epithelial cells expressing the autoimmune regulator gene (Aire) and the other is peripheral tolerance mediated by regulatory T cells such as Foxp3(+)CD25(+)CD4(+) T cells. In addition, the eye is an immune privileged site where indigenous immunomodulatory mechanisms allow immune protection of the eye in a manner that is largely devoid of immunogenic inflammation.

Novel roles of complement in T effector cell regulation

Our understanding of the complement system has markedly evolved from its early beginnings as a protein system merely detecting and tagging a pathogen for further clearance. For example, the repertoire of danger that complement recognizes covers currently a wide range of distinct self and non-self danger signals. Further, complement is now firmly established as instructor of adaptive B and T cell immunity. This review focuses on two the recent emerging paradigms in the field. Firstly, that complement is not only vitally required for the induction of Th1 immunity but also for the timely contraction of this protective response and therefore for prevention of autoimmunity and immune homeostasis. Secondly, that local rather than systemic complement is impacting on immune modulation during a T cell response.

Complement regulation of T-cell alloimmunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize recent findings implicating complement as an important regulator of T-cell immune responses. We then provide perspective for how these newly described mechanisms apply to allograft injury and how they could ultimately influence therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to known effects of serum complement as an effector arm of antibody-initiated injury, T cells and antigen-presenting cells produce complement proteins and up-regulate complement receptors following cognate interactions. The locally released and activated, immune cell-derived complement signals predominantly through C3a and C5a binding to their receptors expressed on both partners to induce immune cell activation and differentiation. Complement deficiency or blockade limits T-cell-mediated autoimmunity and transplant rejection, whereas removal of the complement regulatory protein decay accelerating factor can enhance T-cell immunity and accelerate graft rejection.

SUMMARY

Emerging data indicate that immune cell-derived complement physiologically regulates immune cell survival and proliferation, modulating the strength and phenotype of adaptive T-cell immune responses involved in transplant rejection. The recognition of the diversity through which complement participates in allograft injury supports the need for continued design and testing of complement inhibitors in human transplant recipients.