Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors as immunomodulatory antirejection agents after intestinal transplantation

[Current State of Intestinal Transplantation]

According to the current practice guidelines of the German Medical Chamber, intestinal transplantation is the only causal option for complicated chronic intestinal failure. However, due to demanding immunological, perioperative, infectious challenges, intestinal transplantation is a complementary treatment option secondary to intestinal rehabilitation, after overt failure of parenteral supplementation. This review contains a selected summary of international literature and guidelines, as well as the transplant practice guidelines of the German Medical Chamber. The field of intestinal transplantation comprises a variety of single and combined transplant procedures which are tailored to individual patients and their comorbidities secondary to complicated chronic intestinal failure. The indication is typically preceded by intense intestinal rehabilitation. Nowadays, around 100-150 intestinal transplants are performed worldwide, resulting in 1- and 3- year survival rates of almost 80 and 70%, respectively. This makes intestinal transplantation the rarest of all vascularised organ transplants which is typically only indicated after all modern measures of intestinal rehabilitation have been exploited.

Unlocking the promise of mesenchymal stem cells and extracorporeal photopheresis to address rejection and graft failure in intestinal transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

In patients with irreversible intestinal failure, intestinal transplant has become a standard treatment option. Graft failure secondary to acute or chronic cellular rejection continues to be a significant challenge following transplant. Even with optimal immune suppression, some patients continue to struggle with refractory rejection. Both extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells (EVs) have been used to treat refractory rejection following intestinal transplantation, although their use remains limited and consistent treatment protocols are lacking.

METHODS

Intestinal transplant recipients who received ECP only or ECP and EVs as rescue therapy for acute cellular rejection or chronic inflammation between 2016 and 2022 were included in this single-center retrospective analysis. Baseline demographics, pre- and post-treatment histopathology, endoscopic and biochemical findings, and long-term transplant outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Three patients (two pediatric and one adult) with acute steroid- and biologic-refractory rejection were treated with ECP and/or EVs, as was one patient (pediatric) with chronic graft rejection and inflammation. Patients received twice weekly ECP for 4 weeks and once weekly thereafter. EVs were administered in three doses each separated by 72 h. Immunosuppression at the time of treatment initiation included high-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus. Histologic resolution of rejection was achieved in all patients over 12-16 weeks. Steroids were weaned to low-dose or withdrawn in every patient within 4 weeks of ECP/EV treatment. C-reactive protein decreased from an average of 14.75 to 1.6 mg/dL post-treatment and fecal calprotectin decreased from average 800 mg/g to 31 mg/g. Donor-induced cytotoxic T cell populations were quantified for two of the patients with acute rejection, and in both cases decreased dramatically following treatment. There were no complications associated with either treatment.

CONCLUSION

Both ECP and EVs present novel opportunities to address graft rejection and inflammation in bowel transplant recipients. More work will be needed to define the optimal therapeutic parameters for each treatment modality.

Posttransplant inflammatory bowel disease after successful solid organ transplantation: Not out of the woods yet

OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal symptoms can occur following pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT), and a subset of children will develop chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) posttransplant. The goal of this study was to characterize patients who developed IBD following SOT, their treatment modalities, and clinical course.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of electronic medical records of patients 0-18 years of age who underwent heart, kidney, liver, or intestinal transplantation at our center from January 2009 to April 2019. Patients who developed IBD were included in the final analysis. Demographics, symptoms, and clinical information were recorded. Endoscopic and histologic data and initial and current medications were noted for each patient. Outcomes of interest included phenotype at the time of IBD diagnosis, surgical interventions for IBD, and clinical trajectory at last median follow-up.

RESULTS

Eight patients with IBD after heart (n = 3, 37.5%), kidney (n = 2, 25.0%), liver (n = 1, 12.5%), intestinal (n = 1, 12.5%), or multivisceral (heart and kidney, n = 1, 12.5%) transplants were included. Before IBD diagnosis, most patients developed diarrhea (n = 5, 62.5%) and abdominal pain (n = 5, 62.5%). Abnormal endoscopic findings were most common in the colon. Patients were started on medications including 5-aminosalicylates, steroids, and azathioprine. Two patients required biologic therapy and were receiving vedolizumab at last follow-up. Some patients required adjustment of immune suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant IBD can occur following SOT. Patients exhibit inflammatory, nonstricturing disease though one patient experienced fistulizing disease. Complications are uncommon and many patients enter remission with 5-aminosalicylates alone, though some require adjustment in primary immune suppression.

Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation

This study explores intestinal transplantation (ITx) as a viable treatment option for intestinal failure (IF). Historical development, donor and recipient considerations, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and outcomes, are reviewed with particular emphasis to the value of living donor ITx. The review highlights the evolution of ITx and emphasizes the ongoing need for patient-specific selection processes. In the realm of pediatric ITx, the article underlines the significance of early intervention to mitigate IF-related liver disease. Overall, it provides a comprehensive overview of this life-saving procedure.

Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in Intestinal Transplant Rejection: Through the Lens of Inflammatory Bowel and Intestinal Graft-Versus-Host Diseases

Intestinal transplantation is a life-saving procedure utilized for patients failing total parenteral nutrition. However, intestinal transplantattion remains plagued with low survival rates and high risk of allograft rejection. The authors explore roles of innate (macrophages, natural killer cells, innate lymphoid cells) and adaptive immune cells (Th1, Th2, Th17, Tregs) in inflammatory responses, particularly inflammatory bowel disease and graft versus host disease, and correlate these findings to intestinal allograft rejection, highlighting which effectors exacerbate or suppress intestinal rejection. Better understanding of this immunology can open further investigation into potential biomolecular targets to develop improved therapeutic treatment options and immunomonitoring techniques to combat allograft rejection and enhance patient lives.

Biologicals in the prevention and treatment of intestinal graft rejection: The state of the art Biologicals in Intestinal Transplantation

Intestinal transplantation is the standard treatment for patients with intestinal failure with severe complications due to parenteral nutrition; however, rejection leads to graft failure in approximately half of both adult and pediatric recipients within 5 years of transplantation. Although intensive immunosuppressive therapy is used in an attempt to reduce this risk, commonly used treatment strategies are generally practice- and/or expert-based, as head-to-head comparisons are lacking. In this ever-developing field, biologicals designed to prevent or treat rejection are used increasingly, with both infliximab and vedolizumab showing potential in the treatment of acute cellular rejection in individual cases and in relatively small patient cohorts. To help advance progress in clinical care, we review the current use of biologicals in intestinal transplantation, and we provide future perspectives to guide this progress.

[Indications and results of intestinal transplantation for short bowel syndrome after mesenteric ischemia]

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the only causal treatment for complicated chronic intestinal failure after mesenteric ischemia and impending failure of parenteral supplementation. Isolated or combined ITx with the inclusion of the intestine is associated with demanding immunological, perioperative and infection associated challenges.

AIM

The characterization of chronic intestinal failure, the indications, transplant survival, transplantation techniques and success rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Collection, summary and critical appraisal of international guidelines, the guidelines of the German Medical Chamber, and the international literature.

RESULTS

The first successful ITx were performed in 1987 and 1988 at the University of Kiel Germany and the University of Pittsburgh, USA. The number of ITx rose continuously but in phases from the end of the 1990s to over 200 per year but has currently decreased to 100-150 per year due to optimized intestinal rehabilitation. While the 1‑year and 3‑year transplant survival rates were 30% and 20% before 1991, they increased in phases up to 60% and 50%, respectively, after 1995 and have now achieved almost 80% and 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The substantial improvement in the results of ITx can be partly explained by progress in operative techniques, intensive care medicine and a better understanding of mucosal immunity; however, optimized strategies in immunosuppression as well as prevention of infectious diseases and malignancies have also made decisive contributions.

Idiopathic Ileal Ulceration After Intestinal Transplantation

Background

Idiopathic ileal ulceration after intestinal transplantation (ITx) has been discussed infrequently and has an uncertain natural history and relation to graft rejection. Herein, we review our experience with this pathology.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 225 ITx in 217 patients with minimum 1 y graft survival. Routine graft endoscopy was conducted up to twice weekly within the first 90 d after ITx, gradually decreasing to once yearly. Risks for ulceration over time were evaluated using Cox regression.

Results

Of 93 (41%) patients with ulcers, 50 were found within 90 d after ITx mostly via ileoscopy; delayed healing after biopsy appeared causal in the majority. Of the remaining 43 patients with ulcers found >90 d after ITx, 36 were after ileostomy closure. Multivariable modeling demonstrated within 90-d ulcer associations with increasing patient age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.027; P < 0.001) and loop ileostomy (versus Santulli ileostomy; HR, 0.271; P < 0.001). For ulcers appearing after ileostomy closure, their sole association was with absence of graft colon (HR, 7.232; P < 0.001). For ulcers requiring extended anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory therapy, associations included de novo donor-specific antibodies (HR, 3.222; P < 0.007) and nucleotide oligomerization domain mutations (HR, 2.772; P < 0.016). Whole-cohort post-ITx ulceration was not associated with either graft rejection (P = 0.161) or graft failure (P = 0.410).

Conclusions

Idiopathic ulceration after ITx is relatively common but has little independent influence on outcome; risks include ileostomy construction, colon-free ITx, immunologic mutation, and donor sensitization.

Immunosuppression Protocols in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation-A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation (IT) and multivisceral transplantation (MVT) are curative therapies for patients with intestinal failure and severe complications associated with total parenteral nutrition. High levels of immunosuppression are required to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR) from the bowel. Studies regarding pre-treatment, induction, and post-transplant therapy have improved graft acceptance, reducing immunosuppression doses and infectious complications. However, the low rate of IT and MVT and the small number of specialized centers have resulted in a limited number of evidence-based immunosuppression protocols. We reviewed immunosuppression in IT and MVT to draw useful conclusions regarding the best protocol strategies for the induction, maintenance, and management of ACR.

METHODS

A review was performed using the PubMed database. Articles on immunosuppression protocols in IT and MVT that addressed graft rejection, infection, or survival, published between 2006 and 2022, were selected.

RESULTS

A total of 690 articles were selected. Two researchers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and selected 14 articles independently. For induction, thymoglobulin, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab are the most frequently used immunosuppressants for induction. Classic maintenance therapy consists of a combination of corticosteroids and tacrolimus. Methylprednisolone with an increased tacrolimus dose is used most frequently to manage ACR. Depending on the receptor response, such as thymoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, or bortezomib, other immunosuppressants should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been great advances in IT and TMV immunosuppression. We conclude that the gold standard immunosuppressive protocol is triple therapy, comprising induction with thymoglobulin, maintenance with steroids for a few months, and tacrolimus and mycophenolate therapy. Innovative approaches for treating intestinal rejection episodes with more appropriate drugs, such as infliximab, adalimumab, or bortezomib, are necessary.

Innovations in Immunosuppression for Intestinal Transplantation

It has been 57 years since the first intestinal transplant. An increased incidence of graft rejection has been described compared to other solid organ transplants due to high immunogenicity of the bowel, which in health allows the balance between of dietary antigen with defense against pathogens. Expanding clinical experience, knowledge of gastrointestinal physiology and immunology have progress post-transplant immunosuppressive drug regimens. Current regimes aim to find the window between prevention of rejection and the risk of infection (the leading cause of death) and malignancy. The ultimate aim is to achieve graft tolerance. In this review we discuss advances in mucosal immunology and technologies informing the development of new anti-rejection strategies with the hope of improved survival in the next generation of transplant recipients.

Transitional B cell cytokines predict renal allograft outcomes

Early immunological biomarkers that predict rejection and chronic allograft loss are needed to inform preemptive therapy and improve long-term outcomes. Here, we prospectively examined the ratio of interleukin-10 (IL-10) to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) produced by transitional-1 B cells (T1B) 3 months after transplantation as a predictive biomarker for clinical and subclinical renal allograft rejection and subsequent clinical course. In both Training (n = 162) and Internal Validation (n = 82) Sets, the T1B IL-10/TNFα ratio 3 months after transplantation predicted both clinical and subclinical rejection anytime in the first year. The biomarker also predicted subsequent late rejection with a lead time averaging 8 months. Among biomarker high-risk patients, 60% had early rejection, of which 48% recurred later in the first posttransplant year. Among high-risk patients without early rejection, 74% developed rejection later in the first year. In contrast, only 5% of low-risk patients had early and 5% late rejection. The biomarker also predicted rejection in an External Validation Set (n = 95) and in key patient subgroups, confirming generalizability. Biomarker high-risk patients exhibited progressively worse renal function and decreased 5-year graft survival compared to low-risk patients. Treatment of B cells with anti-TNFα in vitro augmented the IL-10/TNFα ratio, restored regulatory activity, and inhibited plasmablast differentiation. To conclude, the T1B IL-10/TNFα ratio was validated as a strong predictive biomarker of renal allograft outcomes and provides a rationale for preemptive therapeutic intervention with TNF blockade.

Maintenance treatment with infliximab for ulcerative ileitis after intestinal transplantation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Evidence has been published on the successful applications of the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody infliximab, such as induction therapy, salvage treatment for acute cellular rejection, and treatment for chronic ulcerative inflammation, in intestinal transplant recipients. However, the optimal protocol for the effective use of infliximab remains largely undetermined due to scarcity of available clinical data. We report a continuative application of infliximab as maintenance therapy for recurrent chronic ulcerative ileitis in a recipient of isolated intestinal transplantation (ITx).

CASE SUMMARY

The patient was a 11-year-old boy with intestinal motility disorder classified as a hypogenic type of intestinal dysganglionosis. The patient underwent living-donor related intestinal transplant. His immunosuppression regimen consisted of daclizumab, tacrolimus, and steroids. Although he did not show rejection while on tacrolimus monotherapy, routine screening endoscopy showed several ulcerative lesions in the distal end of the graft 2 years after the intestinal transplant. Endoscopic work up to evaluate the progression of anemia revealed stenosis with ulcerative inflammatory changes and multiple longitudinal ulcers in the graft. Since the endoscopic findings suggested ulcerative lesions in Crohn's disease, infliximab treatment was considered. Treatment with infliximab and a small dose of oral prednisolone afforded successful withdrawal of total parenteral nutrition and maintenance of a well-functioning graft without infectious complications for 5 years since the administration of the first dose of infliximab.

CONCLUSION

Infliximab is effective as maintenance therapy for recurrent chronic ulcerative ileitis in an isolated ITx patient.

Rejection of intestinal allotransplants is driven by memory T helper type 17 immunity and responds to infliximab

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) can be life-saving for patients with advanced intestinal failure experiencing complications of parenteral nutrition. New surgical techniques and conventional immunosuppression have enabled some success, but outcomes post-ITx remain disappointing. Refractory cellular immune responses, immunosuppression-linked infections, and posttransplant malignancies have precluded widespread ITx application. To shed light on the dynamics of ITx allograft rejection and treatment resistance, peripheral blood samples and intestinal allograft biopsies from 51 ITx patients with severe rejection, alongside 37 stable controls, were analyzed using immunohistochemistry, polychromatic flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR. Our findings inform both immunomonitoring and treatment. In terms of immunomonitoring, we found that while ITx rejection is associated with proinflammatory and activated effector memory T cells in the blood, evidence of treatment efficacy can only be found in the allograft itself, meaning that blood-based monitoring may be insufficient. In terms of treatment, we found that the prominence of intra-graft memory TNF-α and IL-17 double-positive T helper type 17 (Th17) cells is a leading feature of refractory rejection. Anti-TNF-α therapies appear to provide novel and safer treatment strategies for refractory ITx rejection; with responses in 14 of 14 patients. Clinical protocols targeting TNF-α, IL-17, and Th17 warrant further testing.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Directs Allograft-Related Innate Responses and Its Neutralization Improves Hepatocyte Engraftment in Rats

The innate immune system plays a critical role in allograft rejection. Alloresponses involve numerous cytokines, chemokines, and receptors that cause tissue injury during rejection. To dissect these inflammatory mechanisms, we developed cell transplantation models in dipeptidylpeptidase-deficient F344 rats using mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus for partial lymphocyte-directed immunosuppression. Syngeneic hepatocytes engrafted in liver, whereas allogeneic hepatocytes were rejected but engrafted after immunosuppression. These transplants induced mRNAs for >40 to 50 cytokines, chemokines, and receptors. In allografts, innate cell type-related regulatory networks extended to granulocytes, monocytes, and macrophages. Activation of Tnfa and its receptors or major chemokine receptor-ligand subsets persisted in the long term. An examination of the contribution of Tnfa in allograft response revealed that it was prospectively antagonized by etanercept or thalidomide, which resolved cytokine, chemokine, and receptor cascades. In bioinformatics analysis of upstream regulator networks, the Cxcl8 pathway exhibited dominance despite immunosuppression. Significantly, Tnfa antagonism silenced the Cxcl8 pathway and decreased neutrophil and Kupffer cell recruitment, resulting in multifold greater engraftment of allogeneic hepatocytes and substantially increased liver repopulation in retrorsine/partial hepatectomy model. We conclude that Tnfa is a major driver for persistent innate immune responses after allogeneic cells. Neutralizing Tnfa should help in avoiding rejection and associated tissue injury in the allograft setting.

Immunologic Complications and Graft Survival in Crohn's Disease and NOD2 Mutant Non-Crohn's Disease Adult Recipients Following Intestine Transplantation

Despite improved outcomes in the modern era of targeted immunotherapy, intestinal failure and chronic parenteral nutrition remains a significant burden for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) worldwide. Transplantation is a key component of management when a patient with CD suffers from life-threatening complications of parenteral nutrition. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) mutation is a risk factor for both development of CD and intestinal allograft rejection.

The parallel paradigm between intestinal transplant inflammation and inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A significant shift in our understanding of the molecular and cellular basis for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) mirrors research that has been ongoing in intestinal transplantation. The blurring of lines between these two disease states creates an avenue into potential therapeutic interventions which take advantage of these molecular similarities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditional knowledge of T-cell involvement in IBD has expanded to highlight the role of T helper 17 (Th17) cells as key effector cells. A similar role has been demonstrated in cellular rejection of intestinal allografts. Genetic polymorphism related to the propagation and function of Th17 cells has been found to confer significant risk of developing autoimmune conditions. Interleukin-23, a cytokine identified as crucial to the expansion of Th17 cells, has become a validated molecular target in psoriatic arthritis and IBD, and could become a target for intestinal transplant therapies.

SUMMARY

Intestinal transplant rejection and IBD share a similar phenotype, especially as it relates to key effector cells and gene polymorphisms. Improvements in our understanding of the immune-pathogenesis of IBD, as well as molecular targeting exploiting that knowledge, provide a potential route to improve outcomes for intestinal transplant patients.

Update on Chronic Rejection After Intestinal Transplant: An Overview From Experimental Settings to Clinical Outcomes

Chronic rejection affects the long-term survival of solid-organ transplants, accounting for an incidence of between 5% and 10% after intestinal/multivisceral transplant. Because of unclear symptoms and signs and endoscopic findings, the diagnosis is often delayed. Presently, allograft removal represents the only available therapy due to the absence of effective pharmacologic approaches. Extensive research, through animal models, has been performed over the past 20 years to clarify the complex immune- and nonimmune-mediated mechanisms behind the development of chronic allograft enteropathy, with the aim of elucidating how to avert chronic rejection. The role of donor-specific antibodies and the way to challenge them in the clinic have gained acceptance among transplant centers as one of the main steps to prevent chronic rejection, although no common protocol exists that can be applied in a systematic fashion. The adjunct of a liver graft when retrans planting is needed in a sensitized recipient due to its protective effect against humoral immunity. Multicenter studies and clinical trials are required to better understand the pathogenesis of chronic rejection and to find the therapeutic answer to this clinical query.

The current therapeutic options for Crohn's disease: from medical therapy to intestinal transplantation

Crohn's disease (CD) has an annual incidence per 100.000 person-year of 20.2 in North America and 12.7 in Europe, and the purpose of this review is to evaluate its medical management, from diagnosis to transplant. Pharmacologic manipulation with nutritional care aims to achieve and maintain remission, but more than half of patients will undergo an intestinal resection, very often repeated over time. They could experience short bowel syndrome (SBS) requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Intestinal transplantation (ITx) represents an alternative in case of irreversible intestinal failure (IF) with life-threatening TPN complications. Patient survival after ITx is 79%, 53% and 43% at 1, 3 and 5 years respectively, with no differences among ITx for other disorders. Areas covered: The research discussed medical therapy with nutritional support, evaluating the role of endoscopy, surgery and transplant in CD. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed search engine up to May 31^th, 2017 without restriction of the language. The decision on paper's eligibility was reached by consensus between the 3 screening authors. Expert commentary: CD treatment is mainly medical, leaving endoscopy and surgery for a complex course. ITx represents a therapeutic option if TPN complications with IF arise.

A Case Report of Acute Cellular Rejection Following Intestinal Transplantation Managed With Adalimumab

There is a higher incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in small bowel transplantation (SBT) compared with transplantation of other solid organs. Although there are reports on the use of infliximab to successfully treat ACR refractory to other treatments, there are no reports, to our knowledge, regarding the use of adalimumab. We present a case of a female patient with a history of Crohn's disease who underwent an isolated SBT and developed an episode of severe ACR. She was initially treated with methylprednisolone, thymoglobulin, basiliximab, and a dosage adjustment of tacrolimus. Results of repeat endoscopies and biopsies revealed no significant improvement. The patient initiated treatment with adalimumab every 2 weeks for a total of 6 months, in addition to maintenance treatment with prednisone and tacrolimus. Subsequent evaluations showed gradual improvement to normal mucosa and villi without ulceration. A regimen that incorporates adalimumab can thus be used to treat ACR after intestinal transplantation. Larger multicenter studies are needed to show the full efficacy of this therapeutic regimen.

The role of biologicals in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the role of biologicals in intestinal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several biologicals have been used in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation for various indications, such as induction therapy, prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, desensitization, anti-inflammatory treatment, as well as treatment of Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Particularly, the administration of biologicals in induction therapy such as T-cell depleting antibodies and interleukin-2 receptor antagonists have significantly contributed to the great improvement of patient and allograft outcome. Novel biologicals, such as B-cell, plasma-cell, and complement-directed agents have been successfully applied to treat antibody and complement-driven alloimmune processes to stabilize long-term outcome. Several other inflammatory allotransplant conditions have been addressed with anti-TNF-α antibodies, such as infliximab.

SUMMARY

Biologicals have contributed significantly to the recent success of intestinal transplantation. Novel developments in this field are supposed to aid in addressing various urgent needs in intestinal transplantation, such as preimmunization, antibody and complement-induced graft injury, as well as pathologies originating from innate immune responses.

Regulatory T cell expressed MyD88 is critical for prolongation of allograft survival

MyD88 signaling directly promotes T-cell survival and is required for optimal T-cell responses to pathogens. To examine the role of T-cell-intrinsic MyD88 signals in transplantation, we studied mice with targeted T-cell-specific MyD88 deletion. Contrary to expectations, we found that these mice were relatively resistant to prolongation of graft survival with anti-CD154 plus rapamycin in a class II-mismatched system. To specifically examine the role of MyD88 in Tregs, we created a Treg-specific MyD88-deficient mouse. Transplant studies in these animals replicated the findings observed with a global T-cell MyD88 knockout. Surprisingly, given the role of MyD88 in conventional T-cell survival, we found no defect in the survival of MyD88-deficient Tregs in vitro or in the transplant recipients and also observed intact cell homing and expression of Treg effector molecules. MyD88-deficient Tregs also fail to protect allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients from chronic graft-versus-host disease, confirming the observations of defective regulation seen in a solid organ transplant system. Together, our data define MyD88 as having a divergent requirement for cell survival in non-Tregs and Tregs, and a yet-to-be defined survival-independent requirement for Treg function during the response to alloantigen.

The current state of intestine transplantation: indications, techniques, outcomes and challenges

Intestine transplantation is the least common form of organ transplantation in the United States and often deemed one of the most difficult. Patient and graft survival have historically trailed well behind other organ transplants. Over the past 5-10 years registry reports and single center series have demonstrated improvements to patient survival after intestinal transplantation that now match patient survival for those without life-threatening complications on parenteral nutrition. For various reasons including improvements in medical care of patients with intestinal failure and difficulty accessing transplant care, the actual number of intestine transplants has declined by 25% over the past 6 years. In light of the small numbers of intestine transplants, many physicians and the lay public are often unaware that this is a therapeutic option. The aim of this review is to describe the current indications, outcomes and advances in the field of intestine transplantation and to explore concerns over future access to this important and life-saving therapy.

Chronic mucosal inflammation/inflammatory bowel disease-like inflammation after intestinal transplantation: where are we now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to highlight the similarities between inflammatory bowel disease and the state of the intestine allograft after transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The mutant nucleotide-binding oligomerization protein 2 (NOD2) gene, which encodes for an intracellular protein that serves as an innate immune system microbial sensor in macrophages, dendritic cells, and certain intestinal epithelial cells, has been recognized as a risk factor in Crohn's disease. Similarly, recent studies have also highlighted the contribution the NOD2 mutation may have on intestinal failure itself. More specifically, in intestinal transplant recipients with the NOD2 mutation, the discovery of the reduced ability to prevent bacterial clearance, increased enterocyte stress response, and failure of key downstream expression of important cytokines and growth factors have been implicated as major factors in intestinal transplant outcomes, namely graft loss and septic death. Treatment strategies with anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, similar to inflammatory bowel disease, have been employed in intestinal transplantation with promising results.

SUMMARY

In intestinal transplantation, there is evidence that the classical alloimmunity pathways that lead toward graft dysfunction and eventual graft loss may, in fact, be working in concert with a disordered innate immune system to produce a state of chronic inflammation not unlike that seen in inflammatory bowel disease.

Short-term TNF-alpha inhibition reduces short-term and long-term inflammatory changes post-ischemia/reperfusion in rat intestinal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibition was shown to reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) after intestinal transplantation (ITX). We studied the effects of different TNFα inhibitors on acute IRI and long-term inflammatory responses in experimental ITX.

METHODS

Orthotopic ITX was performed in an isogenic ischemia/reperfusion model in Lewis rats. The TNFα inhibition groups received infliximab post-reperfusion; etanercept pre-reperfusion and at postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7; or pentoxifylline pre-reperfusion and at POD 1 to 5. Tissue samples were taken from proximal and distal graft sections and mesenteric lymph nodes at 20 min, 12 hr, 7 day, and 6 months post-reperfusion for histopathology, immunohistology, terminal deoxyribosyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and real-time RT-PCR. Lung sections were stained for the myeloperoxidase assay.

RESULTS

TNFα inhibitors decreased inflammatory changes after IRI in all treatment groups. Infliximab significantly improved 7-day survival and reduced the histological and immunohistochemical signs of IRI, the numbers of graft-infiltrating T cells and ED1 monocytes and macrophages, and pulmonary neutrophil infiltration, and also enhanced the accumulation of cytoprotective markers. Graft injury was more prominent in the distal graft than in the proximal graft in all groups, regardless of TNFα inhibition.

CONCLUSION

Infliximab significantly reduced both acute IRI and, as with other TNFα inhibitors, long-term inflammatory responses after rat ITX. TNFα inhibition may help diminish chronic inflammatory long-term effects and avoid chronic allograft enteropathy.

Neurological complications of solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is the preferred treatment for an expanding range of conditions whose successful therapy has produced a growing population of chronically immunosuppressed patients with potential neurological problems. While the spectrum of neurological complications varies with the type of organ transplanted, the indication for the procedure, and the intensity of long-term required immunosuppression, major neurological complications occur with all SOT types. The second part of this 2-part article on transplantation neurology reviews central and peripheral nervous system problems associated with SOT with clinical and neuroimaging examples from the authors' institutional experience. Particular emphasis is given to conditions acquired from the donated organ or tissue, problems specific to types of organs transplanted and drug therapy-related complications likely to be encountered by hospitalists. Neurologically important syndromes such as immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), and posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are readdressed in the context of SOT.

Cytotoxic effector function of CD4-independent, CD8(+) T cells is mediated by TNF-α/TNFR

BACKGROUND

Liver parenchymal cell allografts initiate both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent, CD8(+) T cell-mediated acute rejection pathways. The magnitude of allospecific CD8(+) T cell in vivo cytotoxic effector function is maximal when primed in the presence of CD4(+) T cells. The current studies were conducted to determine if and how CD4(+) T cells might influence cytotoxic effector mechanisms.

METHODS

Mice were transplanted with allogeneic hepatocytes. In vivo cytotoxicity assays and various gene-deficient recipient mice and target cells were used to determine the development of Fas-, TNF-α-, and perforin-dependent cytotoxic effector mechanisms after transplantation.

RESULTS

CD8(+) T cells maturing in CD4-sufficient hepatocyte recipients develop multiple (Fas-, TNF-α-, and perforin-mediated) cytotoxic mechanisms. However, CD8(+) T cells, maturing in the absence of CD4(+) T cells, mediate cytotoxicity and transplant rejection that is exclusively TNF-α/TNFR-dependent. To determine the kinetics of CD4-mediated help, CD4(+) T cells were adoptively transferred into CD4-deficient mice at various times posttransplant. The maximal influence of CD4(+) T cells on the magnitude of CD8-mediated in vivo allocytotoxicityf occurs within 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

The implication of these studies is that interference of CD4(+) T cell function by disease or immunotherapy will have downstream consequences on both the magnitude of allocytotoxicity as well as the cytotoxic effector mechanisms used by allospecific CD8(+) cytolytic T cells.

How I treat cryptococcosis in organ transplant recipients

Cryptococcosis is a significant opportunistic mycoses in organ transplant recipients. Topical developments in the field in the past few years have highlighted important issues and at the same time raised new questions regarding the management of this yeast. These include, for example, management of pretransplant cryptococcosis during transplant candidacy and timing of transplant in these instances; potential for donor transmission of cryptococcosis in light of recent fatal transmissions; and prevention and treatment of Cryptococcus-associated immune reconstitution syndrome. Discussed herein are challenges posed by these issues and evidence-based data to optimize the management of posttransplant cryptococcosis.

Combination therapy of tacrolimus and infliximab reduces inflammatory response and dysmotility in experimental small bowel transplantation in rats

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation initiates a functionally relevant inflammatory response by activation of resident macrophages within the muscularis associated with dysmotility. Infliximab is used successfully as a potent anti-inflammatory agent for the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases and as rescue therapy in acute steroid-resistant rejection in selected settings in clinical small bowel transplantation. We hypothesize that additional perioperative treatment with infliximab diminishes initiation of the inflammatory cascade and improves motility in small bowel grafts using a standard tacrolimus immunosuppressive protocol.

METHODS

Orthotopic intestinal transplantation was performed in rats. In two treatment groups (24/168 hr), infliximab was administered intravenously directly after reperfusion and tacrolimus was injected intramuscularly after transplantation and once a day. Two other treatment groups (24/168 hr) received standard immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus. Isogenic and allogenic transplanted vehicle-treated animals (24/168 hr) and native gut served as control.

RESULTS

Infliximab-treated grafts exhibited significantly less leukocyte infiltration at 24/168 hr after transplantation and at 168 hr significantly less apoptosis in the tunica muscularis compared with tacrolimus monotherapy. Additional infliximab treatment resulted in increased smooth muscle contractility (30%) after 24 hr compared with tacrolimus control.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysmotility of transplanted small bowel results from reperfusion injury and acute rejection. Additional perioperative treatment with infliximab reduces early unspecific inflammatory responses and complements immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus.

Perioperative infliximab application has marginal effects on ischemia-reperfusion injury in experimental small bowel transplantation in rats

PURPOSE

Ischemia-reperfusion injury leads to impaired smooth muscle function and inflammatory reactions after intestinal transplantation. In previous studies, infliximab has been shown to effectively protect allogenic intestinal grafts in the early phase after transplantation with resulting improved contractility. This study was designed to reveal protective effects of infliximab on ischemia-reperfusion injury in isogenic transplantation.

METHODS

Isogenic, orthotopic small bowel transplantation was performed in Lewis rats (3 h cold ischemia). Five groups were defined: non-transplanted animals with no treatment (group 1), isogenic transplanted animals with vehicle treatment (groups 2/3) or with infliximab treatment (5 mg/kg body weight intravenously, directly after reperfusion; groups 4/5). The treated animals were sacrificed after 3 (group 2/4) or 24 h (group 3/5). Histological and immunohistochemical analysis, TUNEL staining, real-time RT-PCR, and contractility measurements in a standard organ bath were used for determination of ischemia-reperfusion injury.

RESULTS

All transplanted animals showed reduced smooth muscle function, while no significant advantage of infliximab treatment was observed. Reduced infiltration of neutrophils was noted in the early phase in animals treated with infliximab. The structural integrity of the bowel and infiltration of ED1-positive monocytes and macrophages did not improve with infliximab treatment. At 3 h after reperfusion, mRNA expression of interleukin (IL)-6, TNF-α, IL-10, and iNOS and MCP-1 displayed increased activation in the infliximab group.

CONCLUSION

The protective effects of infliximab in the early phase after experimental small bowel transplantation seem to be unrelated to ischemia-reperfusion injury. The promising effects in allogenic transplantation indicate the need for further experiments with infliximab as complementary treatment under standard immunosuppressive therapy. Further experiments should focus on additional infliximab treatment in the setting of acute rejection.