Effect of combined treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue and growth hormone in patients with central precocious puberty who had subnormal growth velocity and impaired height prognosis

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and recombinant human growth hormone treatment for idiopathic central precocious puberty in girls

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) in combination with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in girls with central precocious puberty (CPP).

METHODS

Clinical data of 80 girls diagnosed with idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP) between January 2017 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment strategy involved GnRHa alone (group A: n=34) and GnRHa+rhGH (group B: n=46). Children's heights (Ht), weights (Wt) and sex hormone levels were measured every 3 months after treatment and bone age (BA) every six months. Heights, growth velocity (GV), predicted adult height (PAH), weights, body mass index (BMI), sex hormone levels and bone age were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Children in group B showed greater height gain at the 12th, 24th and 30th months after treatment (p<0.05) than those in group A, had faster growth rates in the first and second year following treatment (p<0.05) and better PAH (p<0.05). No statistical differences in weight or BMI were found between the two groups before treatment or at any time after treatment (p>0.05). Levels of LH and FSH were lower in both groups after treatment with no statistical differences between groups (p>0.05). The gap between bone age and chronological age gradually decreased in both groups and no abnormal progression of bone age or other adverse side effects occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of GnRHa with rhGH produced better height gains than GnRHa alone for patients with CPP. The gonadal axis was suppressed and progression of bone age delayed with good safety and efficacy.

Combined therapy with GnRH analogue and growth hormone increases adult height in children with short stature and normal pubertal onset

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) combined with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) can improve the adult height (AHt) of children with short stature and normal pubertal onset.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, GnRHa/rhGH treatment was given to children with normal pubertal onset and short stature. Patients were followed up to measure their AHt. The primary outcomes were the disparity between AHt standard deviation score (AHt SDS) and pre-treatment height standard deviation score (Ht SDS) and the disparity between AHt and target height (THt).

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were included. Forty-nine boys were treated with GnRHa/rhGH for 24.84 ± 13.01 months, and 45 girls were treated for 23.89 ± 10.43 months. (2) Before treatment, the Ht SDS of boys and girls was -1.82 ± 1.30 and -1.10 ± 1.61, respectively, and the target height was 168.98 ± 3.51 cm and 157.90 ± 3.25 cm, respectively. (3) After treatment, for boys, the AHt SDS increased by 1.37 ± 1.28 (p = 0.000) and the disparity between AHt and THt was 0.98 ± 6.18 cm (p = 0.273); for girls, the AHtSDS increased by 1.28 ± 1.48 (p = 0.000), and the disparity between AHt and THt was 3.64 ± 4.86 cm (n = 45, p = 0.000). (4) Subgroup analysis showed that, for boys with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and non-ISS, AHt SDS increased by 2.00 ± 1.16 (p = 0.000) and 0.71 ± 1.06 (p = 0.003) respectively, compared with the pre-treatment HtSDS; The disparities between AHt and THt were -0.70 ± 6.54 cm and 2.73 ± 5.37 cm respectively. For girls with ISS and non-ISS, AHtSDS increased by 2.73 ± 1.21 (p = 0.000) and 0.748 ± 1.19 (p = 0.001), respectively; AHt increased by 2.63 ± 6.12 cm (p = 0.165) and 4.02 ± 4.37 cm (p = 0.000) compared with THt, respectively. (5) Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the baseline bone age (BA) (β = -0.200, p = 0.003), basal IGF-1(β = -0.002, p = 0.008) and HtSDS (β = -0.679, p = 0.000) had negative effects on increment of AHtSDS.

CONCLUSION

For adolescents with normal pubertal onset and short stature, with or without ISS, GnRHa/rhGH therapy can effectively improve AHtSDS. After treatment, ISS adolescents can reach the THts, and Non-ISS adolescents can exceed their THts.

Comparing adult height gain and menarcheal age between girls with central precocious puberty treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist alone and those treated with combined growth hormone therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) therapy with or without growth hormone (GH) therapy for girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (CPP).

METHODS

The medical records of 166 girls diagnosed with CPP from 2002 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. All included patients were treated with GnRHa for ≥36 months. Changes in height standard deviation score (SDS) for bone age, chronological age (CA), and predicted adult height (PAH) were assessed for the first three years of treatment. The final height gain SDS was calculated as the difference between the initial PAH SDS and adult height (AH) SDS; these were then compared between the GnRHa group (group A, n=135) and the combined GnRHa/GH group (group B, n=31).

RESULTS

The initial mean CA was 7.89 years. The mean menarcheal age was 13.12 years (group A, 13.1±0.99; group B, 13.18±0.58 years; P=0.755). PAH SDS at the start of GnRHa treatment and AH SDS were significantly lower in group B than in group A (PAH SDS: -2.20±0.83 vs. -3.19±0.84, P&lt;0.001; AH SDS: 0.18±084 vs. -0.30±0.66, P=0.021). The increase in PAH SDS was higher in group B than in group A for the first three years of GnRHa treatment (1.66±0.66 vs. 2.35±0.93, P&lt;0.001). The height gain SDS was significantly higher in group B than in group A (2.5±0.75 vs. 2.93±1.02, P=0.048). Younger age, higher PAH at the start of treatment, and a greater increase in PAH SDS during the first year of GnRHa treatment positively affected AH.

CONCLUSION

The combined GH group had more additional height gain than the GnRHa-alone group.

Subnormal Growth Velocity and Related Factors During GnRH Analog Therapy for Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty

OBJECTIVE

Data concerning subnormal growth velocity (GV) and factors that influence this during gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) therapy for idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP) are scarce. We investigated the incidence of subnormal GV and associated factors in patients receiving GnRHa therapy for ICPP.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the records of 50 girls who had been diagnosed with ICPP and started on GnRHa treatment before the age of eight years were investigated. Subnormal GV frequency, related factors during GnRHa therapy and the effect on final height were examined.

RESULTS

During the treatment, a significant decrease in the annual GV and GV standard deviation score (SDS) of the patients was observed. In 16 (32%) patients GV never declined below -1 SDS, while a decline was noted once and twice in 19 (38%) and 15 (30%) patients respectively. The median age of detection of subnormal GV was 9.9 (4.9-10.9) years. Patients with pubic hair at diagnosis were found to have an increased risk of subnormal GV (p=0.016). There was a significant negative correlation between diagnostic basal luteinizing hormone (LH) level and the first and second year GV SDS (p=0.012 and 0.017 respectively). A significant negative correlation between bone age at diagnosis and 3^rd year GV SDS, and 4^th year GV SDS (p=0.002 and p=0.038) was also observed. LH suppression significantly increased during treatment (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

In girls with ICPP the risk of subnormal GV appears highest at the 3^rd year of GnRHa treatment, particularly in those patients with, at the time of diagnosis, pubic hair in conjunction with high baseline and peak LH and advanced BA and excessive LH suppression on follow-up.

Effects and safety of combination therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue and growth hormone in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects and safety of the combination therapy for girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty (ICPP).

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) that adopted gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) therapy and GnRHa plus growth hormone (GH) combination therapy to treat ICPP girls.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs (162 patients) and six CCTs (247 patients) were included. Compared to the GnRHa therapy group, the combination therapy group achieved taller final height (mean difference, MD = 2.81 cm, 95 % CI 1.76-3.87, four CCTs; MD = 4.30 cm, 95 % CI 0.59-8.01, one RCT); greater progression of final height compared with target height (MD = 3.92 cm, 95 % CI 3.12-4.73, four CCTs; MD = 4.00 cm, 95 % CI 1.93-6.07, One RCT) and larger height gains (MD = 3.49 cm, 95 % CI 0.97-6.01, four CCTs; MD = 3.88 cm, 95 % CI 0.15-7.61, one RCT). No severe adverse effects of treatment were reported.

CONCLUSION

For ICPP girls, the GnRHa and GH combination therapy had advantages over GnRHa alone on final height and no severe adverse effects were reported. We recommend comprehensive assessment of the individual growth rate, patient compliance, the clinical effects, the height expectations of individual patients and the treatment cost to the family in order to identify the best therapy for individual patients.

The Efficacy of GnRHa Alone or in Combination with rhGH for the Treatment of Chinese Children with Central Precocious Puberty

The addition of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) to GnRH agonist (GnRHa) to treat central precocious puberty (CPP) is controversial. We systemically reviewed and evaluated the efficacy and safety of the rhGH and GnRHa adjunctive therapy in Chinese children with CPP and assessed the influence of age and therapy duration on the efficacy of the combined treatment. A total of 464 patients were included from 14 studies. Compared with baseline, administration of GnRHa plus rhGH led to a significant increase in height, predicted adult height (PAH) and height standard deviation for bone age (HtSDS-BA), corresponding to a weighted mean difference (WMD) (95%CI) of 9.06 cm (6.41, 11.70), 6.5 cm (4.47, 8.52), and 0.86 (0.58, 1.14) respectively. Subgroup analysis showed the combined therapy had increased efficacy in subjects with initial treatment age younger than 10 years old or with treatment lasting over 12 months. Compared with GnRHa alone treatment, the combined treatment led to a significant increase in height, PAH and HtSDS-BA, corresponding to a WMD (95% CI) of 3.56 cm (2.54, 4.57), 3.76 cm (3.19, 4.34) and 0.56 (0.43, 0.69). The combined treatment exhibited no safety concerns. Our findings may aid clinicians in making treatment decisions for children with CPP.

Current pharmacotherapy of central precocious puberty by GnRH analogs: certainties and uncertainties

INTRODUCTION

GnRH analogs represent the drug of choice for medical treatment of central precocious puberty (CPP). They provided prompt and reversible suppression of reproductive axis and several reports have shown that adult height is preserved in treated children.

AREAS COVERED

This review updates GnRH analog treatment in CPP by a search of the literature published on the topic since 1980.

EXPERT OPINION

Monthly GnRH analogs are currently considered the 'gold standard' for the medical treatment of CPP, since a lot of experience is accumulated on their use in children. Differences in long-term outcome (in terms of adult height) are reported and they may be due to differences in selection criteria, treatment monitoring, criteria to stop of therapy, different biological activity of the various drugs and different genetic background of treated patients; altogether, these items remain poorly evaluated. Psychological indications for treatment and long-term psychological outcome of treated children should be better addressed. Comparative trials among the various GnRH analogs are very scarce. New very long-acting GnRH analogs (quarterly or yearly formulations) may improve compliance with therapy, but longer follow-up studies are needed. Medical treatment of CPP should be close to pediatric endocrinologists or tertiary pediatric endocrinology centers with documented experience in this field.

Final height outcome after three years of growth hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment in short adolescents with relatively early puberty

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess final height (FH) and adverse effects of combined GH and GnRH agonist (GnRHa) treatment in short adolescents born small for gestational age or with normal birth size (idiopathic short stature).

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Thirty-two adolescents with Tanner stage 2-3, age and bone age (BA) less than 12 yr for girls or less than 13 yr for boys, height sd score (SDS) less than -2.0 SDS or between -1.0 and -2.0 SDS plus a predicted adult height (PAH0) less than -2.0 SDS were randomly allocated to receive GH plus GnRHa (n=17) or no treatment (n=15) for 3 yr. FH was assessed at the age of 18 yr or older in girls or 19 yr or older in boys.

RESULTS

FH was not different between treatment and control groups. Treated children had a larger height gain (FH-PAH0) than controls: 4.4 (4.9) and -0.5 (6.4) cm, respectively (P<0.05). FH was higher than PAH0 in 76 and 60% of treated and control subjects, respectively. During follow-up, 50% of the predicted height gain at treatment withdrawal was lost, resulting in a mean gain of 4.9 cm (range, -4.0 to 12.3 cm) compared with controls. Treatment did not affect body mass index or hip bone mineral density. Mean lumbar spine bone mineral density and bone mineral apparent density tended to be lower in treated boys, albeit statistically not significant.

CONCLUSION

Given the expensive and intensive treatment regimen, its modest height gain results, and the possible adverse effect on peak bone mineralization in males, GH plus GnRHa cannot be considered routine treatment for children with idiopathic short stature or persistent short stature after being born small for gestational age.

A brief review of the addition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-Ag) to growth hormone (GH) treatment of children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency: Previously published studies from America

Despite aggressive, early and continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment of children with idiopathic (I) growth hormone deficiency (GHD), height outcomes are often below -1 SDS and do not achieve mid-parental height targets. As pubertal growth accounts for 15% of total growth and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-Ag) therapy has successfully prolonged the "prepubertal" growth phase in central precocious puberty, the addition of GnRH-Ag to GH in IGHD has been widely utilized to try to enhance linear growth. Results in the two large GH registry databases and GH prediction models do not support the success of such treatment, although several smaller, controlled trials do indicate some value. Whether GnRH-Ag therapy could be more successful if its use were related to the tempo or age of onset of puberty in a specific child is not known. No universally agreed guidelines exist for the use of GnRH-Ag plus GH in children with GHD or other short stature syndromes and may still be considered experimental.

Treatment of central precocious puberty

The problems of central precocious puberty (CPP) are serious enough to the patient to deserve treatment. There is a general consensus among paediatric endocrinologists that the treatment of true CPP (i.e., in children young enough to have a formal diagnosis) is indicated in many cases. In children with modestly early puberty who are not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria, this is not the case. The treatment of choice is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue. Prolonged analogues are more effective than short-acting ones and, most importantly, independent of patient compliance. Data on agonists have accumulated over two decades and evidence of effects is rich in girls but sparse in boys. GnRH agonists are generally effective and safe drugs; the suppression of puberty is reversible and there is much information on GnRH agonists for the treatment of CPP showing very few adverse effects and the effects on final height are well documented in girls < 6 years of age. There is some (but not highly convincing) evidence for their effect on final height for those of 6 - 8 years of age and there is no evidence for an increase in final height after the age of 8 years in girls. If a decision to have treatment is taken, treatment should start immediately as a possible benefit is less probable if the start of treatment is delayed. When treatment should be stopped is a matter of controversy. Combination with growth hormone increases final height, but the clinical relevance can be discussed as well as the health economy aspects. The limits of indications are still to be defined.

Can bone age determination provide criteria for growth hormone treatment in adopted girls with early puberty?

In treatment of idiopathic central precocious puberty, GnRH analogues (GnRHa) have been accepted as the treatment of choice. Since growth velocity may be impaired with GnRHa treatment growth hormone (GH) treatment has been added in clinical trials. Recently, a study followed adopted girls with early or precocious puberty on GnRHa or combined GnRHa and GH treatment to final height. It was found that final height was significantly higher in the combined treatment group, although the difference was small. It was seen that patients that were extremely short at arrival and short at start of treatment seemed to be candidates for combined treatment. We have now analysed the data in order to define criteria for the sub-group in need of combined GnRHa-GH treatment in order to achieve normal final height, i.e. above -2 SDS. Bone ages of 46 patients at start of treatment, randomized to either GnRHa treatment or GnRHa treatment combined with GH, were examined blindly by the same radiologist and the PAH calculated. The methods according to Greulich-Pyle / Bayley-Pinneau (GP/BP) and Tanner-Whitehouse (TW2) were used. Predictions versus final height data were analysed. The accuracy of FH prediction was greatest for GnRHa treated group using the GP/BP method. The GP/BP method gave useful cut off limits for when combined treatment was necessary to possibly achieve normal height. If pre-treatment GP/PAH was > 157cm, the patients attained normal height with GnRHa treatment only. Ten out of 13 (77%) such girls could be correctly identified. Using TW2 with a cut off of 164 cm, 9 out of 13 could be selected. Using a multi regression equation of best fit the number of correctly selected cases for GnRHa treatment only, could not be further increased in this group. We conclude that bone age determination and adult height prediction with the Greulich-Pyle/Bayley-Pinneau method, provides useful criteria for selecting the subgroup of adopted girls with early puberty where combined treatment with GnRHa and GH is not necessary to reach normal final height.

Final height after treatment of early puberty in short adopted girls with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist with or without growth hormone

OBJECTIVE

To compare final height data after treatment with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone or in combination with growth hormone (GH) in short adopted girls with early puberty.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six girls with onset of puberty before 10 years of age were treated for 3 years with either GnRHa alone (group A, n = 12) or with GnRHa and GH (group B, n = 14). Mean age at start of treatment was 9.6 years in both groups, bone age was 10.7 (SD 1.1) years in group A and 11.6 (0.8) years in group B.

RESULTS

Initial height prediction with average Bayley & Pinneau tables was 149.8 (5.6) and 146.8 (4.8) cm, respectively. Bone age at discontinuation of treatment was 12.3 (0.9) and 13.0 (0.6) years in group A and B, respectively. Height gain defined as the difference between initial height prediction and attained final height, was significantly different between group A and B (5.2 (3.7) and 8.2 (3.4) cm, P < 0.05) using average tables for height prediction. With accelerated tables for prediction the numbers were -1.0 (3.6) and 3.3 (3.5) cm, respectively. At final height, there was no significant difference in height: group A: 155.0 (5.6) cm and group B: 155.0 (5.5) cm.

CONCLUSIONS

After 3 years of GnRHa treatment in adopted girls with early puberty, FH is significantly higher than initial height prediction. The addition of GH resulted in a limited further increase in height gain. In the interpretation of the results methodological issues concerning height prediction have to be taken into account.

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist treatment with or without recombinant human GH in adopted children with early puberty

BACKGROUND

Early onset of puberty is frequently observed in adopted children. During treatment with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), a decrease in height velocity (HV) precludes height gain.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

We studied the effect of the addition of GH to GnRHa treatment in a 3-year prospective randomized trial in 30 adopted children with early puberty.

PATIENTS

Mean age (SD) at start of treatment was 9.6 (0.9) years in girls and predicted adult height (PAH) using a segmented bone age (BA) assessment method was 148.0 (5.3) cm.

RESULTS

HV decreased gradually in both groups with a higher HV in the group with GH addition (group B). No significant difference between the rates of bone maturation [change in bone age (DeltaBA)/change in chronological age (DeltaCA)] of both treatment groups was observed. After 3 years of treatment, PAH increase was 5.7 (3.8) cm in group A (GnRHa alone) and 10.1 (3.8) cm in group B (P < 0.01). IGF-I levels were higher in group B. HV decreased slowly in both groups during treatment, unlike stabilization of IGF-I levels.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, after 3 years of treatment, the addition of GH to GnRHa results in higher HV and a significant increase in PAH compared to GnRHa alone.

Combined therapy with GnRH analog plus growth hormone in central precocious puberty

GnRH analogues (GnRHa) arrest pubertal development, and slow growth velocity (GV) and bone maturation, thus improving adult height in central precocious puberty (CPP). In some patients, however, GV decreases to such an extent that it compromises the improvement in predicted adult height (PAH) and therefore the addition of GH is suggested. Of 20 patients with idiopathic CPP (treated with GnRHa [depot-triptorelin] at a dose of 100 microg/kg every 21 days i.m. for at least 2-3 yr) whose GV fell below the 25th percentile for chronological age (CA), ten received, in addition to the GnRHa, GH at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/wk, s.c. 6 days weekly, for 2-4 yr. Ten patients matched for BA, CA, and duration of GnRHa treatment who showed the same growth pattern but refused GH treatment, served to evaluate the efficacy of the addition of GH. No patient showed classical GH deficiency. Both groups discontinued treatment at a comparable BA (mean +/- SEM): 13.2 +/- 0.2 yr in GnRHa + GH vs 13.0 +/- 0.1 yr in the control group. At the conclusion of the study all the patients had achieved adult height. Adult height was considered to be attained when the growth during the preceding year was less than 1 cm, with a BA of over 15 yr. Patients of the group treated with GH + GnRHa showed an adult height significantly higher (p<0.001) than pretreatment PAH (160.6 +/- 1.3 vs 152.7 +/- 1.7 cm). Height SDS for BA significantly increased from -1.5 +/- 0.2 at start of GnRHa to -0.21 +/- 0.2 at adult height (p<0.001). Target height was significantly exceeded. The GnRH alone treated group reached an adult height not significantly higher than pretreatment PAH (157.1 +/- 2.5 vs 155.5 +/- 1.9 cm). Height SDS for BA did not change (from -1.0 +/- 0.3 at start of GnRHa to -0.7 +/- 0.4 at adult height). Target height was just reached but not significantly exceeded. The gain in centimeters obtained calculated between pretreatment PAH and final height was 7.9 +/- 1.1 cm in patients treated with GH combined with GnRH analogue while in patients treated with GnRH analogue alone the gain was just 1.6 cm +/- 1.2 (p=0.001). Furthermore, no side effects, bone age progression, or ovarian cysts, were observed in GnRHa + GH treated patients. In conclusion, a gain of 7.9 cm in adult height represents a significant improvement which justifies the addition of GH for 2-3 yr to conventional treatment with GnRH analogues in patients with central precocious puberty, and with a decrease in growth velocity so marked as to impair predicted adult height to below the third percentile.

Precocious puberty in immigrant children: indications for treatment

Immigration from developing countries to Europe has greatly increased during the last few years. Very little information is available on children who immigrated with their biological family, thus this paper deals only with children immigrating by adoption. In recent years some studies have shown an increased incidence of precocious puberty among adopted children, but information on this issue is scanty. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain precocious puberty in adopted children, including nutritional, ethnic and/or emotional factors. Untreated precocious puberty is associated with short stature and has social and psychological consequences in addition to those related to adoption. Therefore, indications for therapy need to be carefully planned. In adopted children age estimation is a possible source of error in timing of puberty as date of birth is often missing or inaccurate. Thus each child must be carefully evaluated.

Adult height in girls with central precocious puberty treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues and growth hormone

GnRH analogues (GnRHa) represent the treatment of choice in central precocious puberty (CPP), because arresting pubertal development and reducing either growth velocity (GV) or bone maturation (BA) should improve adult height. However, in some patients, GV decrease is so remarkable that it impairs predicted adult height (PAH); and therefore, the addition of GH is suggested. Out of twenty subjects with idiopathic CPP (treated with GnRHa depot-triptorelin, at a dose of 100 microg/kg im every 21 days, for at least 2-3 yr), whose GV fall below the 25th percentile for chronological age, 10 received, in addition to GnRHa, GH at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg x week s.c., 6 days weekly, for 2-4 yr; and 10 matched for BA, chronological age, and duration of GnRHa treatment, who showed the same growth pattern but refused GH treatment, served to evaluate the efficacy of GH addition. No patient showed classical GH deficiency. Both groups discontinued treatment at a comparable BA (mean +/- SEM): 13.2 +/- 0.2 in GnRHa plus GH vs. 13.0 +/- 0.1 yr in the control group. At the conclusion of the study, all the patients had achieved adult height. Adult height was considered to be attained when the growth during the preceding year was less than 1 cm, with a BA of over 15 yr. Patients of the group treated with GH plus GnRHa showed an adult height significantly higher (P < 0.001) than pretreatment PAH (160.6 +/- 1.3 vs. 152.7 +/- 1.7 cm). Target height (TH) was significantly exceeded. The group treated with GnRH alone reached an adult height not significantly higher than pretreatment PAH (157.1 +/- 2.5 vs. 155.5 +/- 1.9 cm). TH was just reached but not significantly exceeded. The gain in centimeters obtained, calculated between pretreatment PAH and final height, was 7.9 +/- 1.1 cm in patients treated with GH combined with GnRHa; whereas in patients treated with GnRHa alone, the gain was just 1.6 +/- 1.2 cm (P = 0.001). Furthermore, no side effects have been observed either on bone age progression or ovarian cyst appearance and the gynecological follow-up in the GH-treated patients (in comparison with those treated with GnRHa alone). In conclusion, a gain of 7.9 cm in adult height represents a significant improvement, which justifies the addition of GH for 2-3 yr during the conventional treatment with GnRHa, especially in patients with CPP, and a decrease in GV so marked as to impair PAH, not allowing it to reach even the third centile.

Catch-up growth after prolonged hypothyroidism

This report presents an analysis of four patients who suffered from longstanding untreated hypothyroidism, with special attention to the phase of catch-up growth after the start of L-thyroxine treatment. Although a permanent height loss could not be prevented, the capacity to establish a remarkable catch-up growth spurt proved to be still intact, even after a long period of thyroid dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Catch-up growth in hypothyroidism may be incomplete if treatment has been started shortly before or during puberty.