Neonatal treatment of BB rats with sulphatide delays development of diabetes but does not change incidence

Uptake of the glycosphingolipid sulfatide in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas in vivo and in isolated islets of Langerhans

Background

The glycosphingolipid sulfatide has previously been found in several mammalian tissues, but information on the uptake of exogenously administered sulfatide in different organs in vivo is limited. In pancreatic beta cells, sulfatide has been shown to be involved in insulin processing and secretion in vitro. In this study, we examined the uptake of exogenously administered sulfatide and its distribution to the pancreatic beta cells. This might encourage future studies of the function(s) of sulfatide in beta cell physiology in vivo. Radioactive sulfatide was given orally to mice whereafter the uptake of sulfatide in the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent delivery to the pancreas was examined. Sulfatide uptake in pancreas was also studied in vivo by i.p. administration of radioactive sulfatide in mice, and in vitro in isolated rat islets. Isolated tissue/islets were analysed by scintillation counting, autoradiography and thin-layer chromatography-ELISA.

Results

Sulfatide was taken up in the gastrointestinal tract for degradation or further transport to other organs. A selective uptake of short chain and/or hydroxylated sulfatide fatty acid isoforms was observed in the small intestine. Exogenously administered sulfatide was found in pancreas after i.p, but not after oral administration. The in vitro studies in isolated rat islets support that sulfatide, independently of its fatty acid length, is endocytosed and metabolised by pancreatic islets.

Conclusion

Our study supports a selective uptake and/or preservation of sulfatide in the gastrointestinal tract after oral administration and with emphasises on pancreatic sulfatide uptake, i.p. administration results in sulfatide at relevant location.

Developmental expression of the type I diabetes related antigen sulfatide and sulfated lactosylceramide in mammalian pancreas

Previous studies have shown that sulfatide is present and functionally involved in beta cells, and that anti-sulfatide antibodies (ASA) exist during development of type I diabetes mellitus. To further explore the possible role of sulfatide in type I diabetes, developmental expression was examined in human pancreas and in pancreas of the type I diabetes models BB rat and NOD mouse compared to Lewis rat and BALB/c mouse, respectively. Sulfatide was not only expressed in adult pancreas, but also in human fetal and rodent neonatal pancreas, i.e., during the growing period of the immunological self. Sulfatide had a different expression pattern in human beings and rodents, concerning both the amounts of sulfatide and expression during development. There was no change in the sulfatide fatty acid isoform expression during development. The pancreatic expression of another sulfated glycosphingolipid, sulfated lactosylceramide, indicated that this molecule is a potential fetal/neonatal marker, which was further expressed in the type I diabetic models. In conclusion, these findings give further support to the possibility that sulfatide is a relevant autoantigen in type I diabetes and that sulfated lactosylceramide might function as a potential risk factor for disease development, at least in the animal models.

Treatment with sulfatide or its precursor, galactosylceramide, prevents diabetes in NOD mice

Sulfatide (3'sulfogalactosylceramide) is a glycosphingolipid present within the nervous system and in the islets of Langerhans. Anti-sulfatide antibodies have been observed in both pre-diabetic and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to test in vivo, the therapeutic effect of sulfatide on the development of diabetes in the NOD mouse. In four separate experiments diabetogenic splenocytes from newly diabetic NOD mice were injected iv into 7-8 week old irradiated (700R) female NOD mice (4-10 million cells/mouse). Each experiment consisted of four treatment groups to which the mice were randomly divided: 1) sulfatide; 2) galactosylceramide (the precursor to sulfatide without sulfate); 3) GM1, a glycosphingolipid negatively charged as sulfatide but with a different sugar composition; and 4) phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The mice received 100 microg glycosphingolipid iv on the day of cell transfer and 1-3 times thereafter at four day intervals, and were screened for diabetes three times a week the next 52 days. Among all the 35 sulfatide-treated mice 54% became diabetic compared to 93 % of 43 PBS-treated animals (p < 0.00001). Correspondingly, galactosylceramide reduced diabetes incidence to 52% (25 mice, p < 0.00001). On the other hand, 86% of GM1-treated mice (n=28) became diabetic indicating that no effect was obtained by this glycosphingolipid. In two experiments in which less spleen cells were transferred (4-5 mill.) and glycosphingolipids were given 4 times, 35% of the sulfatide-treated animals (n = 17) developed diabetes compared to 85% of PBS-treated mice (n = 20, p < 0.001). A robust proliferative response to sulfatide, but none to GM1, was observed when spleen cells were rechallenged with glycosphingolipid in vitro. Thus, like insulin and GAD, sulfatide is able to prevent diabetes in NOD mice.

Effect of intrathymic administration of mycobacterial heat shock protein 65 and peptide p277 on the development of diabetes in NOD mice: caution required in vaccination studies

Heat shock protein 65 (hsp65) and a derived peptide, p277, are autoantigens reported in IDDM. I.p. injection of hsp65 reduced diabetes incidence in NOD mice and administration of p277 cured already diabetic mice. Also, intrathymic (i.t.) administration of whole islets or GAD65 prevented diabetes in NOD mice. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether i.t. injection of mycobacterial hsp65 or p277 can prevent diabetes in NOD mice. Three-week-old NOD female mice were injected intrathymically with 50 microg of hsp65 (n=30), 5 microg of p277 (n=30), and PBS (n=29). Diabetes incidence was observed for the following 300 days. Pancreas was then used for histological and immunohistological evaluation. No significant differences in diabetes incidence were observed among the three groups of mice. Interestingly, hsp65-treated mice developed diabetes slightly faster at 177+/-6 days compared to 202+/-8 days (p=0.015) for the p277-treated group and 197+/-7 days (p=0.033) for controls. The insulitis score and average islet size did not differ significantly among the three groups of diabetic mice. Scattered TCR-gamma/delta positive cells were found in the pancreas of all groups of mice. In contrast, a huge infiltrate of TCR-gamma/delta positive cells was detected in four out of eight (50%) p277-diabetic NOD mice. Thus, our data show an earlier onset of diabetes in hsp65-treated mice and no improvement in the incidence with either hsp65 or p277, suggesting that hsp65 acts in a different way from what was reported with GAD65. Caution is advised in future vaccination studies as hsp65 poses a potential danger.

Diabetic animal models

Insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes is a frequent disease with an incidence of up to about 1%. It requires daily treatment and serious late complications are observed. Good animal models exist for studying diabetes. These can be categorized as animals with spontaneously developing diabetes (BB rats, NOD mice) and as animals with induced diabetes (e.g. by virus). Immunodeficient nude mice have also been widely used. None of the models is perfect, but each has contributed to our present knowledge of the disease. Studies on the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes are given as an example. Recently, experience with prophylactic treatment of animals in order to prevent diabetes has been applied to humans with promising results.