Lactate levels in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin and its association with dose of metformin and renal function

Rationale and Design of a Phase 2, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial Evaluating AMP Kinase-Activation by Metformin in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Introduction

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), the most common primary glomerular disease leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), is characterized by podocyte injury and depletion, whereas minimal change disease (MCD) has better outcomes despite podocyte injury. Identifying mechanisms capable of preventing podocytopenia during injury could transform FSGS to an "MCD-like" state. Preclinical data have reported conversion of an MCD-like injury to one with podocytopenia and FSGS by inhibition of AMP-kinase (AMPK) in podocytes. Conversely, in FSGS, AMPK-activation using metformin (MF) mitigated podocytopenia and azotemia. Observational studies also support beneficial effects of MF on proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcomes in diabetes. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test MF in podocyte injury with FSGS has not yet been conducted.

Methods

We report the rationale and design of phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT evaluating the efficacy and safety of MF as adjunctive therapy in FSGS. By randomizing 30 patients with biopsy-confirmed FSGS to MF or placebo (along with standard immunosuppression), we will study mechanistic biomarkers that correlate with podocyte injury or depletion and evaluate outcomes after 6 months. We specifically integrate novel urine, blood, and tissue markers as surrogates for FSGS progression along with unbiased profiling strategies.

Results and Conclusion

Our phase 2 trial will provide insight into the potential efficacy and safety of MF as adjunctive therapy in FSGS-a crucial step to developing a larger phase 3 study. The mechanistic assays here will guide the design of other FSGS trials and contribute to understanding AMPK activation as a potential therapeutic target in FSGS. By repurposing an inexpensive agent, our results will have implications for FSGS treatment in resource-poor settings.

Effect of continuous use of metformin on kidney function in diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Diabetes patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of contrast induced-acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). The effects of continuous use of metformin on kidney function are still controversial in patients submitted to primary PCI. This study aimed to assess continuous metformin therapy on kidney function in diabetic patients undergoing coronary intervention.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-four patients with metformin-treated diabetes, who underwent coronary intervention within 24 h for STEMI, were enrolled in the retrospective study. All the patients had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. According to the physicians' decisions after admission, 119 patients continued metformin treatment after primary PCI, while 165 patients discontinued it > 48 h after the procedure. Serum creatinine was collected at admission and within 48 h post primary PCI to evaluate the incidence of CI-AKI. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the determinants of CI-AKI.

RESULTS

No statistical difference in CI-AKI incidence between the continuous and the discontinuous metformin group (12.6%vs10.3%, p = 0.545). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated eGFR ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2[p = 0.025, OR: 3.131; 95% CI (1.156-8.482)] and contrast volume [p = 0.002, OR: 1.010; 95% CI (1.004-1.016)] were predictive factors of CI-AKI. Metformin therapy was irrelevant to CI-AKI [p = 0.365, OR: 0.698; 95% CI (0.320-1.521)]. No case of lactic acidosis was found in this study. Besides, the study supported discontinuation of metformin was not beneficial for patients' blood glucose control after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicated that the metformin continuation after primary PCI for STEMI in diabetic patients with eGFR > 30 ml/min / 1.73 m2 did not increase the risk of CI-AKI.

Are patients with mild to moderate renal impairment on metformin or other oral anti-hyperglycaemic agents at increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and metabolic acidosis after radiocontrast exposure?

AIM

To investigate whether the use of metformin during computed tomography (CT) with radiocontrast agents increases the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and metabolic acidosis after CT in type 2 diabetes patients with mild to moderate renal failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient records from January 2015 to December 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 374 patients were included in the final analysis. Of them, 157 patients received metformin, and 217 patients were taking other oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) during radiocontrast administration.

RESULTS

No significant difference in CIN incidence was observed between the metformin use group and the other OHAs group (p=0.085). Metabolic acidosis after CT was seen in 91 (58%) patients who used metformin and 141 (65%) patients who were taking other OHAs. There was no relationship between metabolic acidosis after CT and the use of metformin (p=0.195). Metabolic acidosis after radiocontrast agent exposure was associated with malignant disease, low serum albumin level, and low serum total CO₂ level at baseline.

CONCLUSION

These data show that other factors, but not metformin use, are associated with metabolic acidosis after radiocontrast agent exposure in patients with reduced renal function. These data support current recommendations that there is no need to discontinue metformin before CT using radiocontrast agents in patients with mild to moderate renal failure.

Is metformin poised for a second career as an antimicrobial?

Metformin, a widely used antihyperglycaemic, has a good safety profile, reasonably manageable side-effects, is inexpensive, and causes a desirable amount of weight loss. In 4 studies of patients with tuberculosis (1 prospective and 3 retrospective), metformin administration resulted in better outcomes. In mice with several models of endotoxemia, metformin diminished levels of proinflammatory cytokines and improved survival. Laboratory studies showed effectiveness of the drug on multiple pathogens, including Trichinella spiralis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Metformin administration in humans and mice produced major changes in the composition of the gut microbiota. These recently discovered microbe-modulating properties of the drug have led investigators to predict wide therapeutic utility for metformin. The recent easing in United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines regarding administration of metformin to patients with kidney disease, and reduced anxiety about patient safety in terms of lactic acidosis, increase the probability of broadening of metformin's usage as a treatment of infectious agents. In this text we review articles pertinent to metformin's effects on microorganisms, both pathogens and commensals. We highlight the possible role of metformin in a wide range of infectious diseases and a possible expansion of its therapeutic profile in this field. A systematic review was done of PubMed indexed articles that examined the effects of metformin on a wide range of pathogens. Metformin was found to have efficacy as an antimicrobial agent in patients with tuberculosis. Mice infected with Trypanosomiasis cruzi had higher survival when also treated with metformin. The drug in vitro was active against T. spiralis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and hepatitis B virus. In addition there is emerging literature on its role in sepsis. We conclude that metformin may have a potential role in the therapy for multiple infectious diseases. Metformin, in addition to its traditional effects on glucose metabolism, provides anti-microbial benefits in patients with tuberculosis and in a very wide range of other infections encounters in vitro and in vivo.

Lactate Levels with Chronic Metformin Use: A Narrative Review

Metformin has been associated with lactic acidosis. Lactate levels are not commonly tested in clinical practice, and it is unclear to what extent metformin would typically increase lactate levels with chronic use. The aim of this review was to determine whether regular monitoring of the plasma lactate level would be beneficial in avoiding lactate accumulation and, ultimately, minimising the incidence of lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients.A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases covering the period up to 30 May 2017 was performed. Search terms included combinations of terms and keywords, including "metformin", "lactate", "lactic acid" and "lactic acidosis". Cases series of lactic acidosis or metformin-associated lactic acidosis were excluded.Of 1539 potentially relevant articles, a total of 52 reported lactate levels from routine/regular pathological tests in metformin users. The studies were subdivided into four themes, regarding metformin usage and the reported lactate levels in patients who: (1) did not have contraindications to the use of metformin; (2) had contraindications, or renal impairment but without other contraindications; (3) exercised; or (4) also received any nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Studies have reported that metformin treatment could increase lactate level of users. However, most results showed that the lactate level remained in the normal range.No definitive conclusions on the benefits of regular lactate monitoring in patients taking metformin can be made. Future research on larger populations focusing on the measurement of lactate levels with continuous metformin use is warranted.

Association between Metformin Use and Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Elevated Lactate Concentration in Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE

Metformin can reduce diabetes-related complications and mortality. However, its use is limited because of potential lactic acidosis-associated adverse effects, particularly in renal impairment patients. We aimed to investigate the association of metformin use with lactic acidosis and hyperlactatemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study from a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. A total of 1954 type 2 diabetes patients were recruited in 2007-2011, and stratified according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Lactic acidosis was defined as plasma lactate levels >5 mmol/L and arterial pH <7.35.

RESULTS

Metformin was used in 61.4% of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Plasma lactate levels were not different in the patients with and without metformin use. There was no difference in prevalence of hyperlactatemia and lactic acidosis between the patients with and without metformin use (18.9% vs. 18.7%, p=0.905 for hyperlactatemia and 2.8% vs. 3.3%, p=0.544 for lactic acidosis). Similar results were observed in the patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m². Most patients with lactic acidosis had at least one condition related to hypoxia or poor tissue perfusion. Multiple regression analysis indicated no association between metformin use and lactic acidosis, whereas tissue hypoxia was an independent risk factor for lactic acidosis [odds ratio 4.603 (95% confidence interval, 1.327-15.965)].

CONCLUSION

Metformin use was not associated with hyperlactatemia or lactic acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Investigation of Risk Factors Affecting Lactate Levels in Japanese Patients Treated with Metformin

Metformin is a biguanaide antidiabetic drug used worldwide, and its effectiveness and benefits have already been established. However, the safety of high doses of metformin in Japanese patients, especially in elderly patients with a decreased renal function, remains unclear. Among the side effects of metformin, lactate acidosis is the most problematic due to a high mortality rate. Therefore, we assessed plasma lactate levels in metformin-treated patients to identify independent risk factors for hyperlactemia. 290 outpatients receiving various doses of metformin at our hospital were enrolled between March and July 2014. Serum electrolytes, Cre (creatinine), BUN (blood urea nitrogen), UA (uric acid), HbA1c (hemoglobin A1c), and lactate levels were investigated. Lactate levels did not significantly differ between the elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly (<75 years) groups. Patients in the elderly group had a significantly lower daily metformin dose and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), compared with the non-elderly group (both p<0.005). Between with and without hyperlactemia groups, no significant differences were observed in either Cre or age. On the other hand, patients with hyperlactemia had a significantly higher dose of metformin than those without hyperlactemia (p<0.05). In this study, we found that old age and mildly impaired kidney function were not associated with increased lactate levels, and that a higher dose of metformin may be an independent risk factor for elevated lactate levels in Japanese patients.

Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

To achieve good metabolic control in diabetes and keep long term, a combination of changes in lifestyle and pharmacological treatment is necessary. Achieving near-normal glycated hemoglobin significantly, decreases risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications. At present there are different treatments, both oral and injectable, available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Treatment algorithms designed to reduce the development or progression of the complications of diabetes emphasizes the need for good glycaemic control. The aim of this review is to perform an update on the benefits and limitations of different drugs, both current and future, for the treatment of T2DM. Initial intervention should focus on lifestyle changes. Moreover, changes in lifestyle have proven to be beneficial, but for many patients is a complication keep long term. Physicians should be familiar with the different types of existing drugs for the treatment of diabetes and select the most effective, safe and better tolerated by patients. Metformin remains the first choice of treatment for most patients. Other alternative or second-line treatment options should be individualized depending on the characteristics of each patient. This article reviews the treatments available for patients with T2DM, with an emphasis on agents introduced within the last decade.

Hyperlactatemia in type 2 diabetes: Can physical training help?

Type 2 diabetic patients often exhibit hyperlactatemia in association with a reduced aerobic-oxidative capacity and a restricted lactate transport. Studies suggest a link between increased lactate levels and the manifestation and progression of insulin resistance. However, the specificities of molecular mechanisms remain unclear, and it is not entirely clear whether elevated lactate levels are a cause or consequence of type 2 diabetes. This review focuses on lactate as a key molecule in diabetes and provides an overview of how regular physical activity can be helpful in normalizing elevated lactate levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Physical training may reduce lactate production and reinforce lactate transport and clearance among this particular patient group. We emphasize the crucial role physical training plays in the therapy of type 2 diabetes due to evidence that pharmacological treatment with metformin, which is commonly used in the first-line therapy of type 2 diabetes, does not help reducing lactate levels.

Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Metformin is widely viewed as the best initial pharmacological option to lower glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the drug is contraindicated in many individuals with impaired kidney function because of concerns of lactic acidosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of lactic acidosis associated with metformin use in individuals with impaired kidney function.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In July 2014, we searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for English-language articles pertaining to metformin, kidney disease, and lactic acidosis in humans between 1950 and June 2014. We excluded reviews, letters, editorials, case reports, small case series, and manuscripts that did not directly pertain to the topic area or that met other exclusion criteria. Of an original 818 articles, 65 were included in this review, including pharmacokinetic/metabolic studies, large case series, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, and a clinical trial.

RESULTS

Although metformin is renally cleared, drug levels generally remain within the therapeutic range and lactate concentrations are not substantially increased when used in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rates, 30-60 mL/min per 1.73 m2). The overall incidence of lactic acidosis in metformin users varies across studies from approximately 3 per 100,000 person-years to 10 per 100,000 person-years and is generally indistinguishable from the background rate in the overall population with diabetes. Data suggesting an increased risk of lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients with chronic kidney disease are limited, and no randomized controlled trials have been conducted to test the safety of metformin in patients with significantly impaired kidney function. Population-based studies demonstrate that metformin may be prescribed counter to prevailing guidelines suggesting a renal risk in up to 1 in 4 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus--use which, in most reports, has not been associated with increased rates of lactic acidosis. Observational studies suggest a potential benefit from metformin on macrovascular outcomes, even in patients with prevalent renal contraindications for its use.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Available evidence supports cautious expansion of metformin use in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease, as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate, with appropriate dosage reductions and careful follow-up of kidney function.

Risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in metformin users with renal impairment: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether treatment with metformin in patients with renal impairment is associated with a higher risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations compared with users of a noninsulin antidiabetic drug (NIAD) who had never used metformin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A cohort of 223,968 metformin users and 34,571 diabetic patients who had never used metformin were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).The primary outcome was defined as either a CPRD READ code lactic acidosis or a record of a plasma lactate concentration >5 mmol/L. The associations between renal impairment, dose of metformin, and the risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations were determined with time-dependent Cox models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

The crude incidence of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current metformin users was 7.4 per 100,000 person-years (vs. 2.2 per 100,000 person-years in nonusers). Compared with nonusers, risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current metformin users was significantly associated with a renal function <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (adjusted HR 6.37 [95% CI 1.48-27.5]). The increased risk among patients with impaired renal function was further increased in users of ≥730 g of metformin in the preceding year (adjusted HR 11.8 [95% CI 2.27-61.5]) and in users of a recent high daily dose (>2 g) of metformin (adjusted HR 13.0 [95% CI 2.36-72.0]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is consistent with current recommendations that the renal function of metformin users should be adequately monitored and that the dose of metformin should be adjusted, if necessary, if renal function falls below 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).

Fasting plasma lactate concentrations in ambulatory elderly patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin therapy: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Metformin is a worldwide accepted biguanide antidiabetic agent, and its effectiveness and benefit have already been well established. Among the side effects of metformin, lactate acidosis is the most problematic because of a high mortality rate, which impedes its use in clinical practice, especially in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Aging is associated with a decreased renal function and increasing comorbidities, but few data are available regarding plasma lactate levels in this unique population. In this study, we assessed fasting plasma lactate levels in ambulatory, elderly Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes, who were taking the drug, metformin, to identify independent risk factors for hyperlactemia in this group.

METHODS

Sixty-six ambulatory type 2 diabetic patients, > 80 years of age (mean, 83.6 years; range, 80-90 years), receiving metformin therapy, were enrolled, from January 2005 to September 2009, in the Diabetes Case Management Program. A further 79 younger patients (also type 2 diabetics on metformin) served as controls (mean age, 59.9 years; range, 37-79 years). Fasting serum electrolytes, creatinine, bicarbonate, glycated hemoglobin, plasma glucose and lactate levels were determined.

RESULTS

Lactate levels did not differ between the elderly and control groups (13.2 +/- 5.2 mg/dL and 13.5 +/- 4.8 mg/dL, respectively). None of the patients fulfilled the lactic acidosis criteria. Patients in the elderly group had a significantly lower daily metformin dose, higher creatinine levels, and lower estimated creatinine clearance, compared with the control group (all p < 0.05). Estimated creatinine clearance was negatively associated with lactate levels in the elderly group (p < 0.05, r = -0.27), but not in the control group. Patients with fasting plasma glucose levels > 130 mg/dL had a 2.8-fold increased risk of developing hyperlactemia.

CONCLUSION

Plasma lactate levels in ambulatory elderly patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin therapy did not differ from those in a younger age group. Patients with fasting plasma glucose levels > 130 mg/dL had a 2.8-fold risk of developing hyperlactemia, but none of them developed lactate acidosis.

Metformin and lactic acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes--from pride and prejudice to sense and sensibility

AIM

To present the cases of lactic acidosis encountered in our department among metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients and to investigate the role of contraindications to metformin use.

METHODS

A survey of medical records of metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients hospitalised for various medical conditions during the years 2004-2005 who exhibited elevated serum concentrations of lactic acid.

RESULTS

Seven metformin-treated type 2 diabetic patients were identified who were not attending our department and were hospitalised with elevated serum lactic acid levels (6 developed lactic acidosis). All patients had one or more contraindications to metformin use. Outcome was favourable in 6 patients, while 1 patient with hepatocellular carcinoma died of liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

So far, metformin is one of the safest first-line oral hypoglycaemic agents. However, caution is needed to avoid patients with evident contraindications. This highlights the need for the practitioner to possess sound clinical judgement when prescribing metformin.

Metformin use in decompensated heart failure

Metformin is associated with decreased mortality and morbidity in stable heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus type II. Diabetic heart failure patients with elevated systolic blood pressure are at increased risk for developing acute decompensated heart failure, which is often associated with decreased kidney function. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis is a rare but fatal side effect that may occur when kidney function is decreased. During acute decompensated heart failure, timely treatment may prevent the decrease in kidney function to the threshold associated with an increased risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Metformin should not be withheld in diabetic patients with stable heart failure who do not have other risk factors for acute decompensated heart failure or lactic acidosis.