Accuracy of the First Fully Automated Method for Anti-cardiolipin and Anti-β2 Glycoprotein I Antibody Detection for the Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Quantification of Antiphospholipid Antibodies: The Importance of Using an Appropriate Methodology for Each Clinical Profile

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) is associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), characterized by thrombosis and obstetric morbidity. aPLs included in APS classification criteria are lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I of IgG or IgM isotypes. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is the most used diagnostic technique to determine aPLs. Recently, new automated technologies mainly based in antigen-coated beads have been developed. The aim is to compare a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (M1) and an antigen-coated bead assay (M2) in obstetric and thrombotic APS patients. All samples from the first 1020 patients received in the Immune Service Laboratory (Hospital 12 de Octubre) during the recruitment period, without exclusions, were analysed for aPLs. The weighted kappa for both methods in all the patients was 0.39 (0.30-0.47). Agreement increased to 0.56 (0.38-0.73) in patients with autoimmune disease. Sensitivity and specificity obtained for M1 were 17.1% and 89.3%, respectively, and 12.7% and 91.4% for M2. The sensibility and specificity of IgG isotypes were higher than the IgM ones. Regarding obstetric patients, M1 obtained significant diagnostic performance and had more sensitivity 23.75 (14.95-34.58) compared to M2 12.50 (6.16-21.79). In conclusion, clinical suspicion-based method selection for aPLs should be considered. To identify obstetric APS patients, solid phase methods remain more preferable.

Antiphospholipid antibodies are persistently positive at high titers. Additive value of platelet-bound C4d

Background

Classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) require that antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity is confirmed after at least 12 weeks. We tested the hypothesis that aPL at high titers remain positive while low titers fluctuate over time. As both platelet-bound C4d (PC4d) and aPL are associated with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we also evaluated whether PC4d can aid in APS diagnosis.

Methods

Data from serum or plasma sent to Exagen’s laboratory for routine aPL testing were analyzed. Anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein-1 antibodies (aB2GP1) were measured by chemiluminescence or ELiA fluorescence enzyme immunoassay; anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex antibodies (aPS/PT) by ELISA; PC4d by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Pearson correlation.

Results

More than 80% of positive samples with aCL and aB2GP1 at high titers - but not low titers - were positive at a retest. Non-criteria aPL (aPS/PT) followed a similar trend. aCL and aB2GP1 measured with two different technologies were highly correlated. PC4d and IgG of the three aPL were at best moderately correlated even when only positive aPL samples were analyzed (coefficient: 0.1917 to 0.2649).

Conclusions

High titers aPL are often persistently positive, allowing an earlier diagnosis and risk assessment at the time of the initial screening. Conversely, a retest may be necessary for low titers. The high correlation between two methodologies suggests that these findings are independent of assay platform. The low to moderate correlation between PC4d and aPL might suggest a possible additive value to evaluate association with thrombosis in autoimmune diseases.

Laboratory Approaches to Test the Function of Antiphospholipid Antibodies

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder caused by the presence of aPLs (antiphospholipid antibodies, i.e., anti-β₂-glycoprotein I and anti-cardiolipin). Everyday practice in terms of laboratory diagnostics of APS includes determination of aPLs and well-known functional assays assessing for lupus anticoagulant (LA), in turn using various tests. According to recent guidelines, the recommended method for LA identification or exclusion is based on the Russell Viper Venom test and a sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time assay. Despite the fact that LA can be quantified in laboratory practice in this way, LA is still used as a binary parameter that is just one of the risk factors of thrombosis in APS. As of today, there are no other functional assays to routinely assess the risk of thrombosis in APS. It is well-known that APS patients display a wide range of clinical outcomes although they may express very similar laboratory findings. One way to solve this dilemma, could be if antibodies could be further delineated using more advanced functional tests. Therefore, we review the diagnostic approaches to test the function of aPLs. We further discuss how thrombin generation assays, and rotational thromboelastometry tests can be influenced by LA, and how experimental methods, such as flow cytometric platelet activation, surface plasmon resonance, or nano differential scanning fluorimetry can bring us closer to the puzzling interaction of aPLs with platelets as well as with their soluble protein ligand. These novel approaches may eventually enable better characterization of aPL, and also provide a better linkage to APS pathophysiology.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome is not associated with an increased risk of subclinical atherosclerosis

Objectives

The persistent positivity of aPLs, either isolated or associated with thrombotic and/or obstetric events (APS), has been associated with the increase of intima-media thickness (IMT) and carotid plaques. Despite the fact that aPLs can promote both thrombotic and obstetric complications, some pathogenic differences have been documented between the two entities. This study aimed to evaluate whether the atherosclerotic risk differs between subjects with obstetric and thrombotic APS.

Methods

A total of 167 APS women (36 obstetric and 131 thrombotic) were compared with 250 aPLs negative controls. IMT of the common carotid artery (CCA) and of the bulb and the prevalence of carotid plaques were assessed.

Results

CCA- and bulb-IMT were significantly higher in women with thrombotic APS, while being similar between the obstetric APS and the controls [CCA-IMT: mean (s.d.) 0.97 (0.49), 0.78 (0.22) and 0.81 (0.12) mm for the thrombotic, obstetric and control groups, respectively, P < 0.001 between thrombotic and controls, P = 0.002 between thrombotic and obstetric; bulb-IMT: mean (s.d.) 1.38 (0.79), 0.96 (0.27) and 0.96 (0.51) mm for the thrombotic, obstetric and control groups, P < 0.001]. Women with thrombotic APS had significantly increased risk of presenting carotid plaques. This risk was significantly lower in obstetric APS.

Conclusion

Unlike thrombotic APS, obstetric APS is not associated with an increase of markers of subclinical atherosclerosis. If confirmed on wider populations, these results could suggest different pathogenetic role of aPLs in promoting atherosclerosis in vascular and obstetric APS, and raise questions on the risk–benefit profile of thromboprophylaxis in obstetric APS outside pregnancy periods.

Assessment of diagnostic methods for the detection of anticardiolipin and anti-βeta2 glycoprotein I antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

We assessed the performance characteristics and correlations of the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA) for detecting IgG and IgM antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) and beta₂ glycoprotein (anti-β₂GPI) antibodies in patients under routine evaluation for APS.

METHODS

Patients (n = 216) referred to ARUP Laboratories for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) and/or aCL or anti-β₂GPI IgG/IgM antibodies evaluation were assessed by ELISA and CIA methods. Diagnostic accuracies, correlations between methods and specific clinical manifestations in APS were investigated.

RESULTS

The areas under the curve (%) for APS using LAC with CIA (74, 95% CI: 65-82) or ELISA (70, 95% CI: 61-79) aPLs were comparable. The overall agreements and linear regression correlations between methods for aPL antibody of the same specificity were variable: aCL IgG 87.3%; R² = 0.7491, aCL IgM 71.6%; R² = 0.2656, anti-β₂GPI IgG 77.2%; R² = 0.7688 and anti-β₂GPI IgM 81.7%; R² = 0.3305.

CONCLUSIONS

With inclusion of LAC, the ELISA and CIA show comparable performance for the diagnosis of APS. However, correlations of APS-specific manifestations were dependent on method of detecting the aPL antibodies suggesting platforms may not be used interchangeable.

Subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic carriers of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies positivity: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Whereas the relationship between subclinical atherosclerosis and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been widely investigated, little is known about subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic carriers with isolated antiphospholipid antibodies positivity (APP).

METHODS

Consecutive APP carriers, APS subjects and matched controls were enrolled. Intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (CCA-IMT) and of the Bulb (Bulb-IMT) and the prevalence of carotid plaques were assessed in all enrolled subjects.

RESULTS

A total of 104 APP carriers, 221 APS subjects, and 325 matched controls were recruited. As compared with controls, APP carriers and APS subjects showed a higher CCA-IMT (0.90 ± 0.24 vs 0.82 ± 0.12, p = 0.014 and 0.93 ± 0.42 vs 0.82 ± 0.12, p < 0.001, respectively), Bulb-IMT (1.10 ± 0.44 vs 0.95 ± 0.18, p = 0.006 and 1.22 ± 0.68 vs 0.95 ± 0.18, p < 0.001, respectively) and an increased prevalence of carotid plaques (33.7% vs 10.2%, p < 0.001 and 38.5% vs 10.2%, p < 0.001, respectively). These results were confirmed stratifying for antibody isotype, after excluding subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus or other autoimmune diseases and after adjusting for major clinical and demographic variables. CCA-IMT, Bulb-IMT and the prevalence of carotid plaques were higher in subjects with high-titer antibodies and progressively increased for an increasing number of positive antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to APS subjects, APP carriers have enhanced subclinical atherosclerosis, a more severe disease being observed in the presence of high-titer antibodies and multiple antibodies positivity. These data argue for a strict monitoring of subclinical signs of atherosclerosis and of cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic APP carriers.

Revisiting the Phadia/EliA cut-off values for anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies: a systematic evaluation according to the guidelines

Background Phadia/EliA fluorescence enzyme immunoassays are widely used automated assays for anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies. To date, cut-off values for these assays have not been evaluated systematically and the evidence behind manufacturer's recommended cut-off values is not clear. Objective To determine Phadia/EliA cut-off values for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) according to the procedures suggested by guidelines. Methods A total of 266 blood donors (135 females and 131 males) were included. The pre-handling and analysis of the samples were performed according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) guideline for solid phase aPL assays. Cut-off values and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CI) for each antibody were established and outliers were handled according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline for reference intervals. Samples from 377 consecutive patients, referred to our thrombophilia center with evidence of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity were included for aPL testing. Results The in-house 99th (97.5th) percentile cut-off values were 11 (8.7), 12 (6.9) 8.5 (5.0) AU/mL for aβ2GPI IgG, IgM and IgA, and 21 (13) GPL-U/mL and 41 (25) MPL-U/mL for aCL IgG and IgM, respectively. The prevalence of positive results (%) defined by these cut-off values in patients with evidence of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity was 9.5 (12.2), 1.6 (2.9), and 7.0 (9.9), and 0.8 (3.8) for aβ2GPI IgG, IgM, and aCL IgG and IgM respectively. The use of in-house 99th percentile cut-off values compared to the manufacturer suggested cut-off values resulted in 1 and 39 fewer samples for aβ2GPI and aCL to be classified as positive for aPL, respectively. Conclusions We present Phadia/EliA cut-off values with 90% CI for aPL determined systematically according to the ISTH and CLSI guidelines. These values are different from values previously determined, suggesting variation of aPLs in different populations. Our findings indicate the need for each laboratory to determine/validate assay specific cut-off values for aPL.

Evaluation of antiphospholipid antibody assays using latent class analysis to address the lack of a reference standard

BACKGROUND

Method evaluation of new assays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as anti-cardiolipin (aCL) or anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2-GPI) is challenging, as no internationally accepted reference material is available yet. Besides a lack of standardization, unacceptable inter-laboratory comparability of established tests is regularly observed. Owing to the absence of a commonly accepted reference standard, the evaluation of two research surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor assays was performed using statistical methods from latent class analysis (LCA).

METHODS

aCL and aβ2-GPI IgG and IgM were measured in sera from 63 antiphospholipid syndrome patients, fulfilling the Sydney criteria, and in 34 healthy controls with four commercial assays. LCA was performed on the results and sera were assigned to the antibody-positive or antibody-negative group. Sera were subsequently evaluated in the SPR assays for aCL and aβ2-GPI. Optimal cutoffs and diagnostic performances of the research systems were established employing the LCA-derived gold standard.

RESULTS

With area under the curve results of 0.96 and 0.89 for the detection of aCL and aβ2-GPI, the research SPR assays discriminated well between antibody-positive and antibody-negative sera. Their sensitivities and specificities were comparable to the investigated commercial immunoassays.

CONCLUSIONS

SPR assays are a suitable tool for the detection of aCL and aβ2-GPI with diagnostic performances not different from currently available commercial tests. LCA enabled the calculation of sensitivities and specificities for aPL assays in absence of a reference standard.

Performance Characteristics of Commercial Immunoassays for the Detection of IgG and IgM Antibodies to β2 Glycoprotein I and an Initial Assessment of Newly Developed Reference Materials for Assay Calibration

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the performance characteristics and impact of newly developed reference calibrators on the commutability between anti-β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2 GPI) immunoassays in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-β2 GPI immunoassays from four manufacturers were evaluated. Serum samples from 269 patients (APS only, n = 31; SLE and APS, n = 83; SLE only, n = 129; pregnancy-related clinical manifestations without APS, n = 26) and 162 women with histories of successful pregnancies were tested. Results were expressed in kit-specific arbitrary units and in the calibrator reference units (RUs) based on 99th percentile cutoff values. Diagnostic accuracies, correlation between kits, and specific clinical manifestations in APS were investigated.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of the assays ranged from 15.8% to 27.2% (IgG) and 12.3% to 15.8% (IgM) while specificities ranged from 79.4% to 86.5% (IgG) and 80.6% to 84.5% (IgM). There was moderate to almost perfect interassay reliability (Cohen κ, 0.69-0.98), and Spearman correlation coefficients were generally improved when results of the IgG determinations were expressed in RUs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although qualitative agreements between immunoassays for both antibody isotypes are acceptable, correlations with APS clinical manifestations were kit dependent. Only the use of IgG reference material improved quantitative correlations between assays.

A contribution to detection of anticardiolipin and anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies: Comparison between a home-made ELISA and a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay

BACKGROUND

Currently, ELISA for detection of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) antibodies is not standardized. Recently, few studies have compared the performance of ELISA with that of fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA), but they have produced debatable results. The aim of this investigation was to compare ELISA with FEIA results in detecting aCL and anti-β2GPI antibodies.

METHODS

The study cohort included 94 primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) patients, 65 subjects with the clinical criteria for PAPS classification but ELISA negative for the laboratory criteria and 165 control subjects. Serum IgG/IgM aCL/anti-β2GPI antibodies were determined using FEIA-EliA™ and a home-made ELISA.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of the two methods were similar with the exception of IgM aCL which was found to be significantly higher in the PAPS patients using the ELISA method, even if IgM aCL was detected at a low level by both techniques. The two assays had a comparable specificity, a high/significant agreement and a significant correlation between the antibody levels. FEIA testing uncovered no significant prevalence of any antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody in the ELISA negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that FEIA is comparable to a home-made ELISA.

Clinical manifestations and anti-phospholipid antibodies in 712 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: evaluation of two diagnostic assays

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the agreement and performance of two tests for aPLs with regard to association with manifestations of the APS in patients with SLE.

METHODS

We investigated 712 SLE patients and 280 population controls. Cardiolipin and β(2) glycoprotein-I antibodies were measured with routine ELISA and a new automated method. Three positivity cut-offs (99%, 90% of controls and recommended cut-off by manufacturers) were used. Associations with previous thrombotic events, thrombocytopenia and, in a subgroup of patients, obstetric morbidity (n = 296) were evaluated. Results were compared with the LA test, performed in 380 patients.

RESULTS

Inter-test agreement was moderate (demonstrated by κ-values 0.16-0.71). Performance of the two tests was similar: at the 99th percentile cut-off, sensitivity for any thrombotic event ranged from 3.7% to 24.8%, while specificity was 84.7-97.7%. Regardless of assay, IgG isotypes were associated with venous thrombosis and ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, whereas aPLs of IgM isotype were weakly associated with ischaemic heart disease. Associations were greatly affected by aPL level. LA performed better than the specific aPL tests. LA was associated with any thrombotic event, odds ratio 5.4 (95% CI 3.1, 9.4), while the specific aPL tests ranged from non-significant to an odds ratio of 1.9 (95% CI 1.03, 3.4) using criteria cut-off. LA was also convincingly associated with other APS manifestations.

CONCLUSION

In relation to thrombotic manifestations, there was moderate agreement but no clear advantages when comparing a routine aPL ELISA with an automated method. APL isotype and titre as well as LA positivity are important for risk assessment in SLE patients.