Acute promyelocytic leukemia with i(17)(q10) on G-banding andPML/RARArearrangement by RT-PCR without evidence ofPML/RARArearrangement on FISH

Identification of a new cryptic PML-RARα fusion gene without t(15;17) and biallelic CEBPA mutation in a case of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a case detected only by RT-PCR but not cytogenetics and FISH

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by the presence of promyelocytic leukemia-retinoic acid receptor α (PML-RARα) fusion gene, which is formed following the specific chromosomal translocation t(15;17)(q22;q21). However, cases with PML-RARα generated by occult t(15;17) which are negative by both cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), are difficult to diagnose, leading to impaired treatment effectiveness. In the present study, we reported a case of a 66-year-old male patient, and bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry and cytogenetics did not support the diagnosis of APL. Molecular techniques, such as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), showed the existence of a cryptic PML-RARα fusion gene, and sequence analysis revealed a new variable isoform. Hotspot gene mutation analysis showed a biallelic CEBPA mutation. He received IA chemotherapy and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) treatment, and finally achieved complete remission. This case report provided valuable insights into the relevance of the correct identification of atypical PML-RARα fusion gene and biallelic CEBPA mutation. Moreover, combination of IA chemotherapy and ATRA treatment suggested a good clinical effect in this atypical PML-RARα.

[Cytogenetic test and clinical study on cryptic acute promyelocytic leukemia with ins (15; 17)]

Objective: To investigate the genetic screening methods for cryptic acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) to further explore its clinical prognosis. Methods: From June 2016 to November 2018, we collected 373 newly diagnosed APL cases. The patients were retrospected by the results of PML-RARα detections both by RT-PCR and i-FISH, those who harbored positive PML-RARα detection by RT-PCR and negative by i-FISH were chosen. Metaphase FISH and Sanger sequencing were further performed to verify these results. Results: A total of 7 cryptic APL cases were discovered. These cases had tiny fragment of RARα inserted into PML in chromosome 15, formed ins (15;17) . The 7 cryptic APL cases had no PML-RARα gene subtype specificity, involving 5 cases in L subtype, 1 case in S subtype and 1 case in V subtype respectively. After the treatment of retinoic acid and arsenic or anthracyclines, 6 cases achieved complete remission, 1 case died of intracranial hemorrhage on the 6th day of therapy. Conclusion: The size and covering position of PML-RARα probe should be taken into account when PML-RARα was performed by FISH on APL patients. Furthermore, combination with Metaphase FISH could improve the recognition of cryptic APL. There were no differences between the cryptic and common APL patients in terms of clinical features and treatment choices. Cryptic APL patients also had a good response to the therapy of retinoic acid and arsenic or anthracyclines.

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia with i(17)(q10)

We herein report a rare chromosomal abnormality observed in an acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patient. She had several APL derivative clones including a clone with i(17)(q10) abnormality, which consists of two kinds of structural abnormalities, a cryptic translocation of t(15;17) and an isochromosome of 17q. Although an obvious microscopic t(15;17) change was not observed on either arms of the isochromosome, PML/RARα fusion signals were detected on an interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. By several cytogenetic analyses of her bone marrow cells, it was confirmed that the i(17)(q10) clone was derived from the classic t(15;17) clone via another intervening clone, cryptic t(15;17).

Acute promyelocytic leukemia with isochromosome 17q and cryptic PML-RARA successfully treated with all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subtype of acute leukemia that is characterized by typical morphology, bleeding events and distinct chromosomal aberrations, usually the t(15;17)(q22;q21) translocation. Approximately 9% of APL patients harbor other translocations involving chromosome 17, such as the t(11;17)(q23;q21), t(5;17)(q35;q12-21), t(11;17)(q13;q21), and der(17). All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) have specific targeted activities against the PML-RARA fusion protein. The combination of ATRA and ATO is reportedly superior to chemotherapy and ATRA as induction therapy for APL. The clinical significance of non-t(15:17) APL-related aberrations is controversial, with conflicting reports regarding sensitivity to modern, targeted therapy. Isochromosome 17q (iso(17q)) is rarely associated with APL and usually occurs concurrently with the t(15:17) translocation. No published data is available regarding the efficacy of ATO-based therapy for APL patients who harbor iso(17q). We report on an APL patient with iso(17q) as the sole cytogenetic aberration and a cryptic PML-RARA transcript, who was treated with ATRA and ATO after failure of chemotherapy and achieved complete remission. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of APL associated with iso(17q) as the sole cytogenetic aberration, which was successfully treated with an ATO containing regimen.

Two distinct clonal populations in acute promyelocytic leukemia, one involving chromosome 17 and the other involving an isochromosome 17

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a t(15;17)(q22;q21) rearrangement. Additional chromosomal rearrangements have been reported in 25-40% of APL patients. The most common abnormality involving chromosome 17 is ider(17). Here we report the case of a patient with APL with isochromosome 17q combined with ider(17), confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenetic data strongly suggest that the involvement of chromosomes 15 and 17 in translocation occurs after formation of the isochromosome 17. The case reported here presents the novel finding of two separate clonal events apparently occurring at the same time in an APL patient.