Characterization of the electrophysiological substrate in patients with Barlow's disease

Outcomes in Patients With Mitral Annular Disjunction and an Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) carries an increased risk of complex ventricular arrhythmias, which can lead to sudden cardiac death. Many of these patients undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, but their ICD outcomes are not known.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of ICD implantation and the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies in patients with MAD.

METHODS

The study included patients with MAD who underwent ICD implantation. Clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging, and device therapy data were collected.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with MAD and ICD were included. Median age was 49 (21) years, and 29 (59%) were female. 13 (27%) patients underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention and 36 (73%) patients for secondary prevention. Over a median follow-up of 27.3 (35.3) months, 23 (47%) patients received ICD therapies. 18 (37%) patients had appropriate ICD therapies, and 5 (10%) patients had inappropriate ICD shocks. Median time to first appropriate therapy was 22.3 (63.3) months. In patients with a secondary prevention ICD indication, the rate of appropriate ICD therapies was 44%, while in patients with a primary prevention ICD indication, it was 15%. Among patients with appropriate ICD therapies, the first therapies were delivered for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 7 (39%) patients and polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 11 (61%) patients. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more likely to have a history of SCA (p = 0.003) and/or low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p = 0.022) before ICD implantation as compared to patients without appropriate ICD therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of patients with MAD and ICD, appropriate ICD therapies were common. Most appropriate ICD therapies were delivered for polymorphic VT or VF. Larger studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of VAs and refine risk stratification in MAD.

Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Late Correct Diagnosis

Background

Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) is a relatively new entity in the field of arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death.

Case Summary

A 19-year-old female patient with a history of aborted sudden cardiac death, initially diagnosed as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in 2012 and received implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Gradual decline in left ventricular ejection fraction and receiving multiple appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks was odd for us. After review of her past medical documents and detailed cardiac imaging diagnosis of AMVP was made.

Discussion

Individuals with AMVP are prone to left ventricular mechanical dispersion, leading to an increased susceptibility to malignant ventricular arrhythmias independent of the severity of MR.

Take-Home Message

This case emphasizes the importance of reviewing old documents and consultation with multiple subspecialists. Follow-up may alter the primary suspected diagnosis.

Role of cardiac magnetic resonance in stratifying arrhythmogenic risk in mitral valve prolapse patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) features for arrhythmic risk stratification in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched for studies reporting MVP patients who underwent CMR with assessment of: left ventricular (LV) size and function, mitral regurgitation (MR), prolapse distance, mitral annular disjunction (MAD), curling, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and T1 mapping, and reported the association with arrhythmia. The primary endpoint was complex ventricular arrhythmias (co-VAs) as defined by any non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or aborted sudden cardiac death. Meta-analysis was performed when at least three studies investigated a CMR feature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023374185.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 11 studies with 1278 patients. MR severity, leaflet length/thickness, curling, MAD distance, and mapping techniques were not meta-analyzed as reported in < 3 studies. LV end-diastolic volume index, LV ejection fraction, and prolapse distance showed small non-significant effect sizes. LGE showed a strong and significant association with co-VA with a LogORs of 2.12 (95% confidence interval (CI): [1.00, 3.23]), for MAD the log odds-ratio was 0.95 (95% CI: [0.30, 1.60]). The predictive accuracy of LGE was substantial, with a hierarchical summary ROC AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: [0.69, 0.91]) and sensitivity and specificity rates of 0.70 (95% CI: [0.41, 0.89]) and 0.80 (95% CI: [0.67, 0.89]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the role of LGE as the key CMR feature for arrhythmia risk stratification in MVP patients. MAD might complement arrhythmic risk stratification.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

LGE is a key factor for arrhythmogenic risk in MVP patients, with additional contribution from MAD. Combining MRI findings with clinical characteristics is critical for evaluating and accurately stratifying arrhythmogenic risk in MVP patients.

KEY POINTS

MVP affects 2-3% of the population, with some facing increased risk for arrhythmia. LGE can assess arrhythmia risk, and MAD may further stratify patients. CMR is critical for MVP arrhythmia risk stratification, making it essential in a comprehensive evaluation.

Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: Risk Stratification and Guiding Antiarrhythmic Therapies

Electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has been utilized to induce ventricular tachycardia (VT), thereby improving risk stratification for patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and determining the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapies, especially catheter ablation. A variety of procedural aspects can be modified during PVS in order to alter the sensitivity and specificity of the test including the addition of multiple baseline pacing cycle lengths, extrastimuli, and pacing locations. The definition of a positive result is also critically important, which has varied from exclusively sustained monomorphic VT (>30 seconds) to any ventricular arrhythmia regardless of morphology. In this review, we discuss the history of PVS and evaluate its role in sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a variety of patient populations. We propose an approach to future investigations that will capitalize on the unique ability to vary the sensitivity and specificity of this test. We then discuss the application of PVS during and following catheter ablation. The strategies that have been utilized to improve the efficacy of intraprocedural PVS are highlighted during a discussion of the limitations of this probabilistic strategy. The role of noninvasive programmed stimulation is also reviewed in predicting recurrent VT and informing management decisions including repeat ablations, modifications in antiarrhythmic drugs, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. Based on the available evidence and guidelines, we propose an approach to future investigations that will allow clinicians to optimize the use of PVS for risk stratification and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with mitral annular disjunction using speckle tracking echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is a structural abnormality characterized by the systolic detachment of the posterior mitral annulus and the ventricular myocardium. It is usually observed coexistent with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and associated with a mechanical dysfunction despite preserved electrical isolation function of the mitral annulus. This study aimed to evaluate left ventricular (LV) function using speckle tracking echocardiography in MVP patients with MAD.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective, single-center study including 103 patients with MVP and 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were performed to assess LV function and MAD presence.

RESULTS

MAD (+) MVP (n = 34), MAD (-) MVP (n = 69), and control (n = 40) groups were enrolled in the study. Among the MVP patients, 34 (33%) had MAD. T-negativity in the inferior leads on electrocardiography was more frequent in the MAD (+) group than in the MAD (-) patients (4.3% vs. 20.6%, p = .014). Mitral regurgitation degree, Pickelhaube sign (17.6% vs. 1.4%, p = .005), and late gadolinium enhancement frequency (35.3% vs. 10.6%, p = .002) were significantly higher in MAD (+) patients. MAD (+) patients had significantly impaired global longitudinal strain (-23.1 ±  2.1 vs. -23.5 ± 2.3, p < .001), basal longitudinal strain (BLS) (-19.6 ±  1.5 vs. -20.5 ± 1.9, p < .001), Mid-Ventricular Longitudinal Strain (-22.2 ± 1.7 vs. -23.2 ± 2.2, p < .001) and LA strain (-24.5 ± 3.9 vs. -27.2 ± 3.6, p < .001) when compared to MAD (-) MVP patients, despite similar LV ejection fraction. All these values of MVP patients were also significantly lower than the control group. The mean MAD distance was 7.8 ± 3.2 mm in MAD (+) patients. Patients with two or more symptoms were higher in the MAD (+) group than in the MAD (-) group (4.3% vs. 44.1%, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a significant decrease in longitudinal strain in MVP patients with MAD, indicating myocardial dysfunction. These findings suggest that MAD may contribute to LV dysfunction and highlight the importance of early detection in younger patients. Further research is needed to explore the functional implications and long-term outcomes of MAD.

Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sports Activity: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Sports Eligibility Assessment

Although mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most prevalent valvular abnormality in Western countries and generally carries a good prognosis, a small subset of patients is exposed to a significant risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), the so-called arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) syndrome. Recent work has emphasized phenotypical risk features of severe AMVP and clarified its pathophysiology. However, the appropriate assessment and risk stratification of patients with suspected AMVP remains a clinical conundrum, with the possibility of both overestimating and underestimating the risk of malignant VAs, with the inappropriate use of advanced imaging and invasive electrophysiology study on one hand, and the catastrophic occurrence of SCD on the other. Furthermore, the sports eligibility assessment of athletes with AMVP remains ill defined, especially in the grey zone of intermediate arrhythmic risk. The definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and treatment of AMVP are covered in the present review. Considering recent guidelines and expert consensus statements, we propose a comprehensive pathway to facilitate appropriate counseling concerning the practice of competitive/leisure-time sports, envisioning shared decision making and the multidisciplinary "sports heart team" evaluation of borderline cases. Our final aim is to encourage an active lifestyle without compromising patients' safety.

Twenty-five years of research in cardiac imaging in electrophysiology procedures for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias

Catheter ablation is nowadays considered the treatment of choice for numerous cardiac arrhythmias in different clinical scenarios. Fluoroscopy has traditionally been the primary imaging modality for catheter ablation, providing real-time visualization of catheter navigation. However, its limitations, such as inadequate soft tissue visualization and exposure to ionizing radiation, have prompted the integration of alternative imaging modalities. Over the years, advancements in imaging techniques have played a pivotal role in enhancing the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of catheter ablation procedures. This manuscript aims to explore the utility of imaging, including electroanatomical mapping, cardiac computed tomography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and nuclear cardiology exams, in helping electrophysiology procedures. These techniques enable accurate anatomical guidance, identification of critical structures and substrates, and real-time monitoring of complications, ultimately enhancing procedural safety and success rates. Incorporating advanced imaging technologies into routine clinical practice has the potential to further improve clinical outcomes of catheter ablation procedures and pave the way for more personalized and precise ablation therapies in the future.

Mitral Annular Substrate and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse With Mitral Annular Disjunction

BACKGROUND

In patients with bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP), mitral annular disjunction (MAD) is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death via incompletely understood mechanisms.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the substrate for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with bileaflet MVP and MAD as well as outcomes of catheter ablation with an emphasis on sustained, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT).

METHODS

A total of 18 consecutive patients (11 women, mean age 54 ± 15 years) with bileaflet MVP and MAD underwent catheter ablation for VT, and/or premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Eight patients had a prior cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

PVCs were targeted for ablation in all 18 patients (symptomatic PVCs n = 15, PVC-induced ventricular fibrillation n = 3). Sustained monomorphic VT was targeted in 7 of 18 patients. Electroanatomic mapping showed low voltage in the area of the mitral annulus corresponding to VT target sites in 6 of 7 patients with sustained VT. Four of 7 patients had low voltage in the areas of MAD. Six of 7 patients with VT were rendered noninducible post-ablation. The PVC burden was reduced from 11.0% ± 10.4% to 4.0% ± 5.5% (P = 0.004). Over a mean follow-up of 33.9 ± 43.4 months, no VTs recurred. There were no major complications. No repeat ablations for VT occurred. Five of 18 patients required repeat ablation for PVCs.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with bileaflet MVP and MAD undergoing catheter ablation, the mitral valve annulus often contains low-voltage areas harboring the substrate for monomorphic VT and PVCs. Ablation in these patients was safe and improved arrhythmia control.

Mitral Annular Disjunction: Associated Pathologies and Clinical Consequences

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of mitral annular disjunction (MAD) and to discuss important challenges in diagnosis and management of MAD.

RECENT FINDINGS

MAD has regained interest in the context of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP), coined as the "arrhythmic" MVP syndrome. In addition, MAD in isolation was recently suggested to be associated with severe arrhythmia and SCD. There is a lack of consensus on the definition of MAD and the imaging modality to be used for diagnosing MAD, and the therapeutic implications of MAD remain uncertain. Furthermore, the exact mechanism underlying the association of MAD with SCD remains largely unexplored.

Developing a Mechanistic Approach to Sudden Death Prevention in Mitral Valve Prolapse

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular fibrillation (VF) can occur in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in the absence of other comorbidities including mitral regurgitation, heart failure or coronary disease. Although only a small proportion with MVP are at risk, it can affect young, otherwise healthy adults, most commonly premenopausal women, often as the first presentation of MVP. In this review, we discuss arrhythmic mechanisms in MVP and mechanistic approaches for sudden death risk assessment and prevention. We define arrhythmogenic or arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) as MVP associated with complex and frequent ventricular ectopy, and malignant MVP (MMVP) as MVP with high risk of SCD. Factors predisposing to AMVP are myxomatous, bileaflet MVP and mitral annular disjunction (MAD). Data from autopsy, cardiac imaging and electrophysiological studies suggest that ectopy in AMVP is due to inflammation, fibrosis and scarring within the left ventricular (LV) base, LV papillary muscles and Purkinje tissue. Postulated mechanisms include repetitive injury to these regions from systolic papillary muscle stretch and abrupt mitral annular dysmotility (excursion and curling) and diastolic endocardial interaction of redundant mitral leaflets and chordae. Whereas AMVP is seen relatively commonly (up to 30%) in those with MVP, MVP-related SCD is rare (2-4%). However, the proportion at risk (i.e., with MMVP) is unknown. The clustering of cardiac morphological and electrophysiological characteristics similar to AMVP in otherwise idiopathic SCD suggests that MMVP arises when specific arrhythmia modulators allow for VF initiation and perpetuation through action potential prolongation, repolarization heterogeneity and Purkinje triggering. Adequately powered prospective studies are needed to assess strategies for identifying MMVP and the primary prevention of SCD, including ICD implantation, sympathetic modulation and early surgical mitral valve repair. Given the low event rate, a collaborative multicenter approach is essential.