Systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome (SHATS): Diagnosis and severity assessment score

Systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome: from hypothesis to evidence

Hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association between blood pressure (BP) and CVD events has been based on mean BP alone. BP variability (BPV) is associated with increased organ damage and CVD events independently or beyond average home BP. To explain this association, we propose the systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome (SHATS) hypothesis. The SHATS hypothesis indicates that hemodynamic stress increases vascular disease and vice versa, leading to a vicious cycle of the association between hemodynamic stress and a vascular disease; this association provides not only the risk but also the trigger for CVD events. The evidences of SHATS were gradually accumulating. We showed arterial stiffness synergistically amplified the association between hemodynamic stress and cardiac overload / CVD events in patients with at least one CVD risk factor.

Maximum home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: KAMOGAWA-HBP study

OBJECTIVE

The maximum blood pressure was reported as a possible marker of organ damage. We previously showed that maximum home blood pressure was significantly associated with development of diabetic nephropathy. In the same cohort of patients with diabetes as in the previous study, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic blood pressure values for the onset of first cardiovascular events.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 1082 patients with type 2 diabetes (47.0% female, median age 65.0) without a history of macrovascular complications. Blood pressure measurements were performed in triplicates every morning and evening for 14 consecutive days from the start of the study. Cox hazards model was used to evaluate the risk of primary endpoint, which was defined as the onset of first major cardiovascular event.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint occurred in 119 patients (incidence rate, 15.7/1000 person-years) during an average of 7.0-year follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) of maximum morning systolic blood pressure (SBP) and maximum evening SBP for cardiovascular events were 1.12 (1.01-1.24) and 1.19 (1.07-1.31), respectively, adjusted by sex, duration of diabetes, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking status, and use of antihypertensive medications. The cutoff values of maximum blood pressure for the events were 150 mmHg in the morning (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.07-2.81) and 157 mmHg in the evening (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.61), using the Youden's index.

CONCLUSION

Maximum home blood pressure is a predictor of subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Seasonal Variation in Day-by-Day Home Blood Pressure Variability and Effect on Cardiovascular Disease Incidence

BACKGROUND

Although day-by-day home blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, it remains unclear whether this association differs from season to season. The present study aimed to assess seasonal variation in day-by-day home BP variability and its association with CVD risk.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from a nationwide, prospective observational study, the J-HOP study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure), in which 14 consecutive days of home BP monitoring were conducted. The values of SD (SD_{systolic BP [SBP]}), coefficient of variation_SBP, and average real variability_SBP of home SBP were used as indices of day-by-day home BPV.

RESULTS

Among 4231 participants (mean age, 64.9±10.9 years, 46.7% male, 91.5% hypertensives), all 3 day-by-day home BPV indices were lower in summer than winter after adjusting for confounding factors. In winter, SD_SBP, coefficient of variation_SBP, and average real variability_SBP were significantly associated with increased risk of CVD events (coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, and aortic dissection; adjusted hazard ratio [95%CI] per 1-SD of SD_SBP, 1.26 [1.02-1.54]; coefficient of variation_SBP, 1.24 [1.02-1.52]; average real variability_SBP, 1.44 [1.17-1.77]). These relationships were also observed in the analysis of quartiles of BPV parameters (adjusted hazard ratio [95%CI] compared to the first quartile, fourth quartile of SD_SBP 2.26 [1.06-4.85]; coefficient of variation_SBP 2.96 [1.43-6.15]; average real variability_SBP 2.73 [1.25-5.93]). In other seasons, however, there were no significant associations between day-by-day home BPV and CVD event risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that day-by-day home BPV measured in winter is more strongly associated with future CVD incidence than that measured in other seasons.

Impact of home blood pressure variability on cardiovascular outcome in patients with arterial stiffness: Results of the J-HOP study

This study sought to investigate whether the relation between increased blood pressure (BP) variability and increased arterial stiffness confers a risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. We analyzed 2648 patients from a practitioner‐based population (mean ± SD age 64.9 ± 11.4 years: 75.8% taking antihypertensive medication) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor who underwent home BP monitoring in the Japan Morning Surge‐Home Blood Pressure Study. The standard deviation (SD_SBP), coefficient of variation (CV_SBP), and average real variability (ARV_SBP) were assessed as indexes of day‐by‐day home systolic BP (SBP) variability. The authors assessed arterial stiffness by brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and divided patients into lower (< 1800 cm/s, n = 1837) and higher (≥1800 cm/s, n = 811) baPWV groups. During a mean follow‐up of 4.4 years, 95 cardiovascular events occurred (8.1 per 1000 person‐years). In Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors including average home SBP, the highest quartiles of SD_SBP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23‐4.32), CV_SBP (HR, 2.89; 95%CI, 1.59‐5.26) and ARV_SBP (HR, 2.55; 95%CI, 1.37‐4.75) were predictive of CVD events compared to the other quartiles in the higher baPWV group. Moreover, 1SD increases in SD_SBP (HR, 1.44; 95%CI, 1.13‐1.82), CV_SBP (HR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.16‐1.90) and ARV_SBP (HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 1.09‐1.73) were also predictive of CVD events. These associations remained even after N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide was added to the models. However, these associations were not observed in the lower baPWV group. We conclude that arterial stiffness contributes to the association between home BP variability and CVD incidence.

Characteristics of hypertension in obstructive sleep apnea: An Asian experience

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a risk of hypertension and is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence. In Asian countries, the prevalence of OSA is high, as in Western countries. When blood pressure (BP) is evaluated in OSA individuals using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), the BP phenotype often indicates abnormal BP variability, such as increased nighttime BP or abnormal diurnal BP variation, that is, non‐dipper pattern, riser pattern, and morning BP surge, and all these conditions have been associated with increased CVD events. Asians have a higher prevalence of increased nighttime BP or morning BP surge than Westerners. Therefore, this review paper focused on OSA and hypertension from an Asian perspective to investigate the importance of the association between OSA and hypertension in the Asian population. Such abnormal BP variability has been shown to be associated with progression of arterial stiffness, and this association could provoke a vicious cycle between abnormal BP phenotypes and arterial stiffness, a phenomenon recognized as systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome (SHATS). OSA may be one of the background factors that augment SHATS. An oxygen‐triggered nocturnal oscillometric BP measurement device combined with a pulse oximeter for continuous SpO₂ monitoring could detect BP variability caused by OSA. In addition to treating the OSA, accurate and reliable detection and treatment of any residual BP elevation and BP variability caused by OSA would be necessary to prevent CVD events. However, more detailed detection of BP variability, such as beat‐by‐beat BP monitoring, would further help to reduce CV events.

High prevalence of masked uncontrolled morning hypertension in elderly non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: Home blood pressure substudy of the ANAFIE Registry

In the ANAFIE Registry home blood pressure subcohort, we evaluated 5204 patients aged ≥75 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to assess blood pressure (BP) control, prevalence of masked hypertension, and anticoagulant use. Mean clinic (C) and home (H) systolic/diastolic BP(SBP/DBP) was 128.5/71.3 and 127.7/72.6 mm Hg, respectively. Overall, 77.5% of patients had hypertension; of these, 27.7%, 13.4%, 23.4%, and 35.6% had well-controlled, white coat, masked, and sustained hypertension, respectively. Masked hypertension prevalence increased with diabetes, decreased renal function, age ≥80 years, current smoker status, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. By morning/evening average, 59.0% of patients had mean H-SBP ≥ 125 mm Hg; 48.9% had mean C-SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg. Early morning hypertension (morning H-SBP ≥ 125 mm Hg) was found in 65.9% of patients. Although 51.1% of patients had well-controlled C-SBP, 52.5% of these had uncontrolled morning H-SBP. In elderly NVAF patients, morning H-BP was poorly controlled, and masked uncontrolled morning hypertension remains significant.

Effects of luseogliflozin on arterial properties in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The multicenter, exploratory LUSCAR study

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular and renal complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and represent guideline-recommended therapy in this indication. However, precise mechanisms underlying the beneficial cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are not fully understood. This study investigated the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor, luseogliflozin, on arterial properties and home blood pressure (BP) in patients with T2DM. This multicenter, single-arm study enrolled adults with T2DM, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5%-8.9% in the previous 4 weeks, and an indication for new/additional antidiabetic therapy. Luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/d was given for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was change in cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) from baseline to Week 4 and Week 12. Home and office BP, BP variability, and metabolic parameters were secondary endpoints. Forty-seven patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10.7 years) treated with luseogliflozin were included in the full analysis set. CAVI did not change significantly from baseline (mean [95% confidence interval] 8.67 [8.37-8.97]) to Week 12 (8.64 [8.38-8.91]; P = .750), but there were significant reductions from baseline in morning home BP, HbA1c, body weight, body mass index, and serum uric acid levels during luseogliflozin therapy. The reduction in morning home systolic BP was ≥ 5 mm Hg and was independent of baseline BP and BP control status. In conclusion, there was no change in arterial stiffness (based on CAVI) during treatment with luseogliflozin, but changes in BP and metabolic parameters were consistent with the known beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM.

Increased Arterial Stiffness Amplifies the Association Between Home Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiac Overload

Increased blood pressure (BP) variability, an index of hemodynamic stress, leads to cardiac overload and worse cardiovascular prognosis. The association between day-by-day home BP variability and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) as an index of cardiac overload may be amplified by increased arterial stiffness as assessed by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) Study participants who were selected from a practitioner-based population with at least one cardiovascular risk factor underwent home BP monitoring, and their BP levels and SD, coefficient of variation, and average real variability as indexes of systolic BP variability were assessed. We analyzed 2115 individuals without prevalent heart failure and divided them into lower (<1800 cm/s, n=1464) and higher (≥1800 cm/s, n=651) baPWV groups. The higher baPWV group had significantly higher SD SBP , CV SBP , ARV SBP values, and NT-proBNP levels than the lower baPWV group (all P <0.001). In the higher baPWV group, a multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the SD SBP was associated with the NT-proBNP level after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors including the average home systolic BP (coefficient per 1 SD increase, 0.049 [95% CI, 0.018–0.081]; P =0.002). Similar trends were found for CV SBP ( P =0.003) and ARV SBP ( P =0.004). However, these associations were not found in the lower baPWV group. There was an interaction between all indexes of systolic BP variability and the NT-proBNP level according to lower or higher baPWV group (all P <0.05). Arterial stiffness amplified the association between home BP variability and cardiac overload.

Single-pill combination of cilnidipine, an L-/N-type calcium channel blocker, and valsartan effectively reduces home pulse pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and sympathetic hyperactivity: The HOPE-Combi survey

The home blood pressure (BP) control by a single-pill combination of cilnidipine (an L-/N-type calcium channel blocker; CCB) and valsartan (HOPE-Combi) survey is a multicenter, post-marketing, prospective observational study of a single-pill combination of cilnidipine 10 mg and valsartan 80 mg (SPC of Cil/Val) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. We examined the effects of the SPC of Cil/Val on morning home systolic BP (MHSBP) and morning home pulse pressure (MHPP) of 1036 patients with hypertension over 12 months. MHSBP decreased by 14.0 mm Hg (P < .01), and MHPP decreased by 6.6 mm Hg (P < .01). Moreover, morning home pulse rate (MHPR) decreased by 2.1 bpm (P < .01). A more progressive and greater decrease in MHSBP (-17.2 vs -10.3 mm Hg, P < .01) and MHPP (-7.6 vs -4.9 mm Hg, P < .01) was observed in patients with higher MHPR (≥70 bpm) than in those with lower MHPR (<70 bpm) over the treatment period. In particular, in patients with a wide MHPP (≥70 mm Hg), the difference in the MHPP reduction was greater in patients with higher MHPR than in those with lower MHPR (-17.9 vs -13.6 mm Hg, P < .01). These results suggested that the SPC of Cil/Val, which possesses the unique sympatholytic characteristics of an L-/N-type CCB, was particularly effective in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and sympathetic hyperactivity.

The HOPE Asia Network activity for "zero" cardiovascular events in Asia: Overview 2020

The impact of hypertension-related cardiovascular disease and target organ damage, and therefore the benefits of blood pressure (BP) control, is greater in Asian than in Western countries. Asia-specific features of hypertension and its effective management are important and active areas of research. The Hypertension Cardiovascular Outcome Prevention and Evidence in Asia (HOPE Asia) Network was formed in 2016 and is now a member of the World Hypertension League. The main goal of the HOPE Asia Network is to improve the management of hypertension and organ protection toward achieving "zero" cardiovascular events in Asia. Considerable work has already been done on the journey to achieving this goal. We have shown that BP control status in Asia differs between countries, and even between regions within the same country. Several expert panel consensus recommendations and clinical guidance papers are available to support the use of home and ambulatory BP monitoring in the region. In addition, the AsiaBP@Home study prospectively investigated home BP control status across 15 specialist centers using the same validated device and measurement schedule. We have also proposed the concept of systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome (SHATS), a vicious cycle of BP variability and vascular disease on cardiovascular events and organ damage, and suggested a SHATS score for risk stratification for clinical practice. This special issue of the journal collates Asia-specific resources and data, contributing to advances in hypertension management and cardiovascular disease prevention in the region.

Highly precise risk prediction model for new-onset hypertension using artificial intelligence techniques

Hypertension is a significant public health issue. The ability to predict the risk of developing hypertension could contribute to disease prevention strategies. This study used machine learning techniques to develop and validate a new risk prediction model for new-onset hypertension. In Japan, Industrial Safety and Health Law requires employers to provide annual health checkups to their employees. We used 2005-2016 health checkup data from 18 258 individuals, at the time of hypertension diagnosis [Year (0)] and in the two previous annual visits [Year (-1) and Year (-2)]. Data were entered into models based on machine learning methods (XGBoost and ensemble) or traditional statistical methods (logistic regression). Data were randomly split into a derivation set (75%, n = 13 694) used for model construction and development, and a validation set (25%, n = 4564) used to test performance of the derived models. The best predictor in the XGBoost model was systolic blood pressure during cardio-ankle vascular index measurement at Year (-1). Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve values in the validation cohort were 0.877, 0.881, and 0.859 for the XGBoost, ensemble, and logistic regression models, respectively. We have developed a highly precise prediction model for future hypertension using machine learning methods in a general normotensive population. This could be used to identify at-risk individuals and facilitate earlier non-pharmacological intervention to prevent the future development of hypertension.