We have had a gutful: The need for deprescribing proton pump inhibitors

Are the deprescribing guidelines for proton pump inhibitors in palliative care applicable? A monocentric observational study

OBJECTIVES

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most commonly prescribed medications. The aim of this study was to assess the appropriateness of prescribing PPIs in the palliative care unit on admission and during hospitalisation to determine the applicability of deprescribing recommendations.

METHODS

A monocentric observational study was conducted over a 6-month period in 2020 in a university palliative care unit. Data on indication, starting date, dose and posology were collected at discharge from the medical record and by contacting the prescriber. A physician and a pharmacist evaluated PPI prescription appropriateness according to guidelines.

RESULTS

131 patients (mean age: 69.5 years; 82% with cancer) were included. Prior to admission, 41% (54/131) of patients were already prescribed PPIs. During hospitalisation, 50% of prescriptions were discontinued, while 12% were initiated. The indication was known for 50% of patients on admission and 59% during their stay. Among patients with PPI prescriptions, 56% had a relevant indication on admission, and 63% during their stay. The prevalence of potential drug interactions was low (<1/10).

CONCLUSIONS

While PPIs remain essential for specific indications, this study highlights their excessive prescription even during palliative care. Implementing deprescribing recommendations in this population is crucial to optimise treatment plans.

Forty years of Helicobacter pylori infection and changes in findings at esophagogastroduodenoscopy

BACKGROUND

It is 40 years since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori infection. Over that time major changes have occurred in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings. The aim of this review is to describe these changes, and the important role H. pylori infection has played in their evolution.

METHODS

References were identified through searches of PubMed using the search terms-endoscopy time trends, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, upper gastrointestinal cancer, gastric polyps, H. pylori, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and celiac disease, from 1970 through December 2021.

RESULTS

The prevalence of H. pylori infection has fallen and consequently, H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer disease has become rare. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is now the commonest disorder diagnosed at EGD, and Barrett's esophagus has increased in parallel. Cancer of the distal stomach has fallen while esophageal adenocarcinoma and reflux-related cardia cancer have risen. Gastric polyps have changed from hyperplastic and adenomas to sporadic fundic gland polyps. Antimicrobial resistance has made H. pylori infection more difficult to eradicate. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis, have emerged as important new allergic disorders. Celiac disease has changed and increased.

CONCLUSIONS

EGD findings appear to have changed from features suggesting a H. pylori-positive "phenotype" 40 years ago to a H. pylori-negative "phenotype" today. These changes have major implications for the management of gastrointestinal disorders.

Outcomes of de-prescribing proton pump inhibitors during acute admissions in a general medical unit: a pilot study

The study describes the feasibility and short-to-medium-term efficacy of an evidence-based proton pump inhibitor (PPI) de-prescribing initiative undertaken as part of routine clinical care during acute admissions in a general medical unit. Of the 44 (median (IQR) age 75.5 (13.75) years; females 25 (57%)) who participated in the study, de-prescription was maintained in 29 (66%) and 27 (61%) patients at 12 and 26 weeks respectively.

Trends in prescribing volumes and costs of proton pump inhibitors in three outpatient specialties: a three-year retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

The study determined a comparative three-year trend in prescribing volumes and costs of proton pump inhibitors in three outpatient specialties of a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Prescription data for three consecutive fiscal years (2016-2018) were extracted from a tertiary hospital electronic database, for the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and orthopaedic outpatient specialties. The data collected were individual proton pump inhibitors, overall and individual prescribing volumes (capsule/tablet) and costs, stratified by specialty and fiscal year.

KEY FINDINGS

Of the three specialties, the largest volume of proton pump inhibitor prescriptions, mostly for omeprazole, comes from the orthopaedic specialty (46%). In terms of prescribing costs, at the top is the cardiovascular specialty (45.75%). Lansoprazole, which is one of the proton pump inhibitors on in the national list of essential medicines, contributed most to the cost. Prescribing proton pump inhibitors that are not included in the national list of essential medicines were responsible for over 90% of the costs in the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal specialties. An escalating trend in prescribing varied proton pump inhibitors, that is, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, dexlansoprazole and rabeprazole, all of which were not on the list of essential medicines, was evident in the latter.

CONCLUSIONS

The highest volume of proton pump inhibitor prescribing-mostly of omeprazole, was issued by the orthopaedic specialty. The cardiovascular specialty was responsible for the largest amount of cost. The increases in the uses and costs of varying proton pump inhibitors which were outside the national list of essential medicines were notable in the gastrointestinal specialty.

Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding proton pump inhibitors among community pharmacists and pharmacy students

Background

There are concerns about inappropriate use and insufficient knowledge of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use among medical staff.

Aims

This study was designed to examine pharmacy students' and community pharmacists' knowledge, attitude, and practices toward PPIs and their relationship with specific sociodemographic characteristics.

Subjects and Methods

This descriptive study was conducted on the pharmacy students (first and last year) at Eastern Mediterranean University and community pharmacists in North Cyprus Data were collected by a validated questionnaire, which assessed knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding PPI use. Students were included without sampling in a volunteer-based manner. Registered community pharmacists were selected randomly.

Results

First-year pharmacy students (n = 77) showed significantly lower knowledge levels than last-year students (12.00 vs. 13.65; P < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between last-year students (n = 111) and community pharmacists (n = 59). First-year pharmacy students were significantly less aware of PPIs' "dosage and administration" than the other two groups. Last-year students and community pharmacists exhibited significantly higher attitude scores regarding PPI use (24.7 and 24.6 vs. 22.7; P < 0.001). Omeprazole was found to be the most preferred PPI among the three studied populations. Community pharmacists used PPIs mainly to treat acid reflux. Gender, nationality, and pharmacy education program type did not influence pharmacy students' knowledge, attitude, or practices.

Conclusions

There was not a significant difference regarding knowledge and attitude between the last-year pharmacy students and community pharmacists. The practices of community pharmacists were significantly different from the pharmacy students. It was concluded that certain essential topics regarding PPI use should be emphasized in pharmacy education and during pharmacy practice. Further, it is essentially important for community pharmacists to continue their education through training programs after graduation to enhance their knowledge of PPI use.

Using an algorithm to assess the rate and trend over time of inappropriate proton pump inhibitors prescription upon hospital discharge

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing interest in inappropriate proton pump inhibitors prescription (InPPIp), as defined by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.

AIMS

To evaluate the rate, trend over time and factors associated with InPPIp upon discharge from internal medicine departments.

METHODS

We evaluated patients discharged from internal medicine departments with a PPI prescription in 2014 and 2017 at an academic referral center according to a developed algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 3,982 patients were included (50.8% women, 74% ≥ 65 years). The rate of InPPIp was 44.3% (95% CI 42.8-45.9) for the entire cohort; 68.1% for subjects aged < 65 years and 36.0% for those aged ≥ 65 years (p<0.001); 43.2% in 2014 and 45.6% in 2017 (p = 0.130). In a decision-tree analysis, after the exclusion of 448 patients with gastrointestinal indications, 89.4% (1,580/1,766) of all InPPIp cases were of patients without dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) and 8.6% (151/1,766) were of patients younger than 65 years, who were taking aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of InPPIp is high, especially among patients not receiving DAPT and young patients taking aspirin. Time trend analysis showed no improvement over time. Our algorithm may serve as an automated quality measuring tool to reduce InPPIp.

Inappropriate proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole prescription in older adults hospitalized in long-term care unit

Purpose

We evaluated the use of the PPI treatment by physicians in older adults hospitalized in a long-term care unit.

Methods

We included 40 patients aged 65 years or older with a lansoprazole prescription hospitalized in long-term care unit from January 2018 to January 2022. Patient characteristics, gastroduodenal history, dose of lansoprazole, indication, days of prescription, and number of medications were collected from electronic patient records.

Results

The mean age of patients was 84.2 ± 9.3. Patients were taking between 5 and 24 (mean = 12.7, SD = 4.4) medications overall with 15 patients taking low dose of aspirin (75 mg daily) and 8 patients taking an antiplatelet. Most patients (82.5%) received once-daily lansoprazole treatment, 55% of whom took a dose of 15 mg. Five patients were treated with the maximum dose of lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily. Only seven patients had an appropriate indication. The minimum of treatment time was 3 days and the maximum was 1198 days; moreover, 24 patients (60%) were still in treatment.

Conclusion

Few PPI prescriptions had an indication in the patient’s electronic record. Prescriptions were ongoing with no date of discontinuation or re-evaluation.

Quality Use of Medicines Indicators and Associated Factors in Residential Aged Care Facilities: Baseline Findings from the Pharmacists in RACF Study in Australia

Prescribing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), including antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, has been used as an indicator of the quality use of medicines in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). PIMs are associated with an increased risk of falls and hospitalisations in the elderly. The purpose of this study is to assess the extent of prescribing of PIMs in RACFs at baseline in the Pharmacists in residential aged care facilities (PiRACF) study and examine the association of resident and system factors with the number of PIMs. A cross-sectional analysis of 1368 participants from 15 Australian RACFs was performed to detect PIMs using the American Geriatrics Society 2019 Beers® criteria. Most residents (68.1%) were taking at least one regular PIM; 16.9% were taking regular antipsychotics and 11.1% were taking regular benzodiazepines. Long-term proton pump inhibitors were the most frequent class of PIMs. History of falls and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with an increased number of prescribed PIMs, while dementia diagnosis and older age (85 years or more) were associated with decreased number of PIMs (p-value <0.05). Residents in facilities with lower nurse-to-resident ratios were more likely to have an increased number of PIMs (p value = 0.001). This study indicates that potentially inappropriate prescribing is common in RACFs and interventions to target residents at highest risk are needed.

Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of hyperprolactinemia with associated sexual disorders

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most widely prescribed medications in the world. According to numerous studies, PPIs have been linked to hyperprolactinemia, which can lead to a variety of sexual and reproductive issues. This review summarizes the effects of numerous PPIs on the blood prolactin levels and associated sexual dysfunctions, which have an effect on the patient's life quality and fertility. The study is taken into account all the available resources till January 31, 2021. Out of total 364, only 27 relevant resources were involved in this review. In certain studies, short-term PPIs use has been shown to have little or no effect on the blood prolactin and other reproductive hormones levels. PPIs have been linked to the development of hyperprolactinemia in several case studies with varying degrees of the blood prolactin levels increase seen in individuals taking PPI alone or in combination with medications, like prokinetics. The relative risk of the sexual consequences development, such as gynecomastia, has been documented using lansoprazole and omeprazole in various cohort studies. On the other hand, other bits of data are insufficient to establish a definite relationship that can turn a possibility into certainty. The majority of the literature data is comprising of double-blind, randomized, crossover studies, case reports, and adverse drug reaction incidents reported to various pharmacovigilance centers. To investigate this link, high-quality studies in patients taking PPIs for a longer time period are needed. We conclude this article with a comprehensive discussion of the hyperprolactinemia clinical implications and the PPIs' function.

Gastric Hyperplastic Polyps Can Shrink After Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Case Series Compared With Continuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors

GOAL

This study investigated whether gastric hyperplastic polyps (GHPs) shrink after discontinuation of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) alone.

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of PPIs has been reported to increase the incidence of GHPs, which sometimes bleed and cause anemia. We experienced a patient whose recurrent hemorrhagic GHPs associated with long-term use of PPIs had disappeared after discontinuation of PPIs.

STUDY

This study was conducted retrospectively at Kyoto University Hospital. Patients with histologically confirmed GHPs who had been taking PPIs for >6 months and who had undergone a repeat endoscopy within 2 years were included. Polyp shrinkage was defined as the disappearance of polyps or a reduction of >50% in the long diameter of the largest polyp.

RESULTS

Six patients who discontinued PPIs were compared with 17 patients who continued PPIs. Polyp shrinkage was significantly more frequent in the PPI-discontinuation group (5/6, 83%) than in the PPI continuation group (0/17, 0%) (P<0.001). In 2 patients in the PPI-discontinuation group, the polyps completely disappeared finally.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that discontinuation of PPIs can shrink GHPs in patients using PPIs.

Who gets prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors and why? A drug-utilization study with claims data in Bavaria, Germany, 2010-2018

PURPOSE

The German annual drug prescription-report has indicated overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for many years; however, little was known about the characteristics of people using PPIs. This study aimed to provide comprehensive utilization data and describe frequencies of potential on- and off-label PPI-indications in Bavaria, Germany.

METHODS

Claims data of statutorily insured people from 2010 to 2018 were used. Defined daily doses (DDDs) of PPIs by type of drug, prevalence of PPI-use and DDDs prescribed per 1000 insured people/day were analyzed. For 2018, proportions of users and DDDs per 1000 insured people were calculated by age and sex. To elucidate changes in prescribing practices due to a suspected drug-drug interaction, we examined co-prescribing of clopidogrel and PPIs between 2010 and 2018. For PPI new users, sums of DDDs and frequencies of potential indications were examined.

RESULTS

PPI prescribing increased linearly from 2010 to 2016 and gradually decreased from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 14.7% of women and 12.2% of men received at least one prescription, and 64.8 DDDs (WHO-def.) per 1000 insured people/day were prescribed. Overall, omeprazole use decreased over the observation period and was steadily replaced by pantoprazole, especially when co-prescibed with clopidogrel. An on-label PPI-indication was not reported at first intake in 52.0% of new users.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of prescribed PPIs has decreased since 2016. However, a large proportion of new PPI-users had no documentation of a potential indication, and the sums of DDDs prescribed often seemed not to comply with guidelines.

Assessment of proton-pump inhibitor use at a tertiary teaching hospital in Nigeria

Background:

Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) is a widely used medication class globally. Because of its good safety profile, there is a huge likelihood of inappropriate use.

Objectives:

To determine the prevalence of PPI use and indications, describe its pattern of usage, and identify factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions at a federal tertiary teaching hospital in Maiduguri, Nigeria.

Methods:

PPI prescriptions were retrospectively assessed in the General Outpatients’ Department (GOPD) and Gastroenterology Unit (GITU) of a teaching hospital. Relevant data for the study were extracted from the patients’ medical records. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests where appropriate were used to identify factors associated with inappropriate PPI prescriptions. A p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results:

PPIs were prescribed to 73.3% (220/300) of patients, while inappropriate prescriptions were noted in 91.4% (201/220) of these patients. Epigastric pain (49.5%) was the most common PPI indication, while omeprazole was the highest prescribed (53.4%). Nearly all inpatients (98.2%), those with epigastric pain (95.7%), and patients who were prescribed intravenous PPIs had more inappropriate PPI prescriptions compared to others.

Conclusion:

This study revealed a high prevalence of PPI use and inappropriate prescriptions at the study hospital. As a result, these findings highlight the importance PPI-based stewardship program at the study hospital.

[Proton-pump inhibitors treatment. Does your patient really need it?]

INTRODUCTION

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently prescribed for wide gastrointestinal disorders. The indications are well established, although a high rate of misuse has been reported.

METHODS

Observation cross-sectional study conducted a tertiary hospital. Adult patients who attended the emergency department were eligible. The appropriate indication was evaluated. Also, the prescription period, dosage and the prescribing clinician were reviewed.

RESULTS

300 patients were included. The indication was adequate in 142 patients (47.3%). The main indication was the primary prophylaxis for NSAIDs/ASA-induced enteropathy (n=95 patients, 31.7%). Polypharmacy was the main misuse indication (n=82 patients, 27.3%). The median prescription duration was 31 months (IQR 9-72), ranging from one month to 360 months. The duration was lower in those with correct indication (42.3 vs 59.6 months, P=.02). The primary care physician was the main responsible for prescription (n=165 patients, 55%), followed by gastroenterologist (n=38 patients, 12.7%) without significant differences in appropriateness by speciality.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies like this raise awareness about the PPI overuse and misuse. Deprescribing should be considered as essential to reduce iatrogenic risk and redundant health expenditure.

Successful deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors with a patient-centered process: the DESPIBP Project

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs, but they are being overprescribed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the applicability of a deprescription algorithm in hospitalized patients with chronic PPI use.

METHODS

A prospective study including consecutive gastroenterology department hospitalized patients with chronic PPI use. The prescription was reassessed and a deprescribing algorithm was applied. Follow-up was carried out at 4, 12, and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 513 (44.22%) of 1160 had chronic PPI use; 371 met inclusion criteria and were evaluated: 285 (76.82%) with appropriate prescription and 86 (23.18%) with inappropriate, mainly (52.30%) due to polypharmacy. Seventy-five patients accepted the deprescribing process. Sixty-one (81.33%) maintained deprescription at week 4, 56 (74.66%) at week 12, and 54 (72.00%) at week 24. Eleven of 21 restarted the PPI because of symptoms. No differences were found between the successful deprescription group and the unsuccessful one, regarding sex (p = 0.877), age (p = 0.635), PPI indication (p = 0.663), or deprescription regimen (p = 0.805). No patient had any adverse event attributable to deprescription.

CONCLUSION

There is a high inappropriate indication for PPIs in patients admitted to the gastroenterology department. The application of a patient-centered deprescribing algorithm is a safe and effective strategy to reduce their inappropriate consumption in the medium term.

Potentially inappropriate proton-pump inhibitor prescription in the general population: a claims-based retrospective time trend analysis

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide, and a large body of evidence raises concerns about their inappropriate use. Previous estimates of inappropriate use varied due to different definitions and study populations.

AIMS

We aimed to measure the population-based incidence and time trends of PPI and potentially inappropriate PPI prescriptions (PIPPI) with a novel method, continuously assessing excessive cumulative doses based on clinical practice guidelines. We also assessed association of patient characteristics with PPI prescriptions and PIPPI.

METHODS

This was an observational study based on a large insurance claims database of persons aged >18 years with continuous claims records of ⩾12 months. The observation period was January 2012 to December 2017. We assessed the incidence and time trends of PPI prescriptions and PIPPI based on doses prescribed, defining ⩾11.5 g of pantoprazole dose equivalents during any consecutive 365 days (average daily dose >31 mg) as inappropriate.

RESULTS

Among 1,726,491 eligible persons, the annual incidence of PPI prescriptions increased from 19.7% (2012) to 23.0% (2017), (p = <0.001), and the incidence of PIPPI increased from 4.8% (2013) to 6.4% (2017), (p = <0.001). Age, male gender, drugs with bleeding risk and multimorbidity were independent determinants of PIPPI (p = <0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that one of the most prescribed drug groups is commonly prescribed inappropriately in the general population and that this trend is increasing. Multimorbidity and drugs with bleeding risks were strong determinants of PIPPI. Addressing PPI prescriptions exceeding guideline recommendations could reduce polypharmacy and improve patient safety.

Proton-pump inhibitors and chronic kidney disease: Hidden consequences of an inappropriate drug use?

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective therapy for gastric acid- related diseases. They are generally well tolerated with rare, often self-limiting adverse reactions. On the other hand, there is growing concern regarding the increased public access and inappropriate PPI use. This review aims to give a critical appraisal of current literature and to analyze a possible relationship between renal disorders and PPI use. A plethora of observational pharmacoepidemiological studies link PPI therapy to the development of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). Most of these studies show a higher risk for acute kidney injury, de novo chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease. However, current evidence is inadequate to establish a causal relationship between PPI use and many of the proposed renal syndromes. Residual confounding and bias related to study design and the over extrapolation of quantitatively small treatment effects contributed to the unnecessary controversy about PPI safety. Undoubtedly, PPI use may rarely induce AIN. Given the worldwide use of PPIs, the number of patients with biopsy- proven AIN is extremely small. However, more research is required to explore the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and possible differences between commercially available PPIs regarding adverse renal effects. Till then, the PPIs should be used in the lowest effective dose, and inappropriate use should be avoided.

Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a high worldwide prevalence in adults and children. There is uncertainty regarding medical versus surgical therapy and different surgical techniques. This review assessed outcomes of antireflux surgery versus medical management of GERD in adults and children, robotic versus laparoscopic fundoplication, complete versus partial fundoplication, and minimal versus maximal dissection in pediatric patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched (2004-2019) to identify randomized control and non-randomized comparative studies. Two independent reviewers screened for eligibility. Random effects meta-analysis was performed on comparative data. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

From 1473 records, 105 studies were included. Most had high or uncertain risk of bias. Analysis demonstrated that anti-reflux surgery was associated with superior short-term quality of life compared to PPI (Std mean difference =  - 0.51, 95%CI  - 0.63, - 0.40, I² = 0%) however short-term symptom control was not significantly superior (RR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.47, 1.21, I² = 82%). A proportion of patients undergoing operative treatment continue PPI treatment (28%). Robotic and laparoscopic fundoplication outcomes were similar. Compared to total fundoplication, partial fundoplication was associated with higher rates of prolonged PPI usage (RR = 2.06, 95%CI 1.08, 3.94, I² = 45%). There was no statistically significant difference for long-term symptom control (RR = 0.94, 95%CI 0.85, 1.04, I² = 53%) or long-term dysphagia (RR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.52, 1.02, I² = 0%). Ien, minimal dissection during fundoplication was associated with lower reoperation rates than maximal dissection (RR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.06, 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence regarding the optimal treatment of GERD often suffers from high risk of bias. Additional high-quality randomized control trials may further inform surgical decision making in the treatment of GERD.

Curbing proton pump inhibitor overprescribing: Multifaceted strategies in an academic hospital

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have become essential in the management of upper gastrointestinal disorders, yet they are prescribed without an indication in up to 89% of cases and the number of prescribed PPIs is on the rise. A working group developed several multifaceted strategies in our multihospital trust to curb inappropriate PPI use. We describe herein these strategies and assess their impact on PPI consumption in a hospital belonging to this trust.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2019, our actions included the publication and presentation of a review of emergent PPI side effects, the development of an appropriate use leaflet, medication audits, journal club meetings, and prescription analysis. We considered that a decrease in PPI consumption could be a relevant surrogate criterion for the appropriation and acceptance of these interventions; this was assessed from 2012 to 2019 and expressed as defined daily dose (DDD)/1000 patient-days.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There was a clear downward trend in the consumption of PPIs, both in medical and surgical wards. The overall PPI use decreased by 17.1% (from 566 to 468 DDD/1000 patient-days). IV PPI consumption dropped by 37.7% (from 146 to 91 DDD/1000 patient-days), while oral PPIs consumption decreased by 10% (from 420 to 378 DDD/1000 patient-days).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Sustained strategies aimed at curbing PPI overprescribing led to a sustained decrease in PPI consumption in our hospital. This decrease encourages us to pursue this strategy and to diversify our actions.

Identification of high-impact gene-drug pairs for pharmacogenetic testing in Alberta, Canada

OBJECTIVES

To facilitate decision-making and priority-setting related to Alberta's Pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing implementation strategy by identifying gene-drug pairs with the highest potential impact on prescribing practices in Alberta.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Annual drug dispensing data for Alberta from 2012 to 2016 for 57 medications with PGx-based prescribing guidelines were obtained, along with population estimates and demographics (age and ethnicity). Frequencies of actionable PGx genotypes by ethnicity were obtained from the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB). Annual dispensing activity for each of the 57 medications was calculated for the full population (all ages) and children/youth (0-19 years). Alberta ethnicity data were cross-referenced with genetic frequency data for each of the main ethnic groups from PharmGKB to estimate the proportion of individuals with actionable genotypes. Actionable genotype proportions and drug dispensing frequencies were collectively used to identify high impact gene-drug pairs.

RESULTS

We found (a) half of the drugs with PGx-based prescribing guidelines, namely, analgesics, proton pump inhibitors, psychotropics, and cardiovascular drugs, were dispensed at high frequencies (>1% of the entire population), (b) the dispensing rate for about one-third of these drugs increased over the 5-year study period, (c) between 1.1 and 45% of recipients of these drugs carried actionable genotypes, and (d) the gene-drug pairs with greatest impact in Alberta predominatly included CYP2C19 or CYP2D6.

CONCLUSIONS

We uncovered specific patterns in drug dispensing and identified important gene-drug pairs that will inform the planning and development of an evidenced-based PGx testing service in Alberta, Canada. Adaptation of our approach may facilitate the process of evidence-based PGx testing implementation in other jurisdictions.

Effect of PPIs on symptomatic hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in incidence and duration of postoperative symptomatic hypocalcemia between those taking and those not taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at the time of total or completion thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent total or completion thyroidectomy at a tertiary medical center between January 2013 and January 2018 was performed. Development of symptomatic hypocalcemia, duration of symptoms, postoperative parathyroid hormone levels, PPI usage and emergency department (ED) visits were recorded.

RESULTS

Data from 371 patients were analyzed. Sixty of 371 (16.2%) patients developed symptomatic hypocalcemia. Sixteen of 89 (18.0%) patients on a PPI developed symptomatic hypocalcemia compared to 44 of 282 (15.6%) not on a PPI (P = .63). The overall average duration of symptoms was 4.3 days (SD [SD] 3.77 days). The average duration of symptoms in those on a PPI was 4.8 days (SD 2.8 days) compared to 4.2 days (SD 4.1 days) in those not on a PPI (P = 0.16). Six of 282 patients (2.1%) not taking a PPI had a postoperative ED visit, compared to two of the 89 patients (2.3%) taking a PPI (P = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no clinically significant difference in incidence and duration of symptomatic hypocalcemia or ED visits after total or completion thyroidectomy between patients that were and were not taking PPIs perioperatively. While the decision to continue PPI should be made on an individual basis, these data suggest that patients may be counseled to continue their PPI perioperatively without increased risk of symptomatic hypocalcemia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Impact of pharmacy-supported interventions on proportion of patients receiving non-indicated acid suppressive therapy upon discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the impact of pharmacy-supported interventions on the proportion of patients discharged from the hospital on inappropriate acid suppressive therapy (AST).

Methods

To identify studies, the following databases were systematically searched on October 14^th, 2018 and repeated on September 12^th, 2019: Ovid MEDLINE(R) and In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Embase.com, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL (EBSCO), and ClinicalTrials.gov. Eligible studies consisted of adults, intervention and historical/usual care groups, description of active pharmacy-supported intervention, and proportion of patients discharged on inappropriate AST. Qualitative assessments and quantitative analyses were performed. Modified funnel plot analysis assessed heterogeneity. Preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology was used to evaluate studies in this review.

Results

Seventeen publications resulting in 16 studies were included in the review. Using random effects model, meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in the odds of being discharged on inappropriate AST from the hospital in the pharmacist-supported intervention arm versus comparator (Odds Ratio 0.33 [95%CI 0.20 to 0.53]), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 86%). Eleven studies favored pharmacy-supported interventions, four were inconclusive and one favored usual care. Using modified funnel plot analysis, our final evaluation was distilled to 11 studies and revealed a similar outcome (OR 0.36 [95%CI 0.27 to 0.48]), but with less heterogeneity (I² = 36%).

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that pharmacy-supported interventions were associated with a significantly reduced probability of patients discharged on inappropriate AST. However, heterogeneity was high and may affect interpretation of results. Using funnel plot optimization method, three positive and two negative studies were objectively removed from analyses, resulting in a similar effect size, but with less heterogeneity. To improve study quality, future researchers should consider utilizing a pre-post, multi-arm, prospective design with sampling randomization, training of data extractors (preferably two extractors), re-evaluating a small dataset to check for agreement and providing a comprehensive methodology in subsequent publications.

Investigation of drugs affecting hypertension in bevacizumab-treated patients and examination of the impact on the therapeutic effect

Background

In patients treated with bevacizumab, hypertension may be a biomarker of therapeutic efficacy. However, it is not clear whether drugs that control blood pressure influence bevacizumab's efficacy. In this study, we investigated drugs that may affect hypertension in bevacizumab‐treated patients and examined the impact on the therapeutic effect.

Patients and methods

We analyzed 3,724,555 reports from the third quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of 2015. All data were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) analysis. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated a total of 58 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and treated for the first time with bevacizumab containing XELOX or mFOLFOX6 at The University of Tokushima Hospital between January 2010 and December 2015. The effect of the treatment was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Thereafter, the effect was confirmed using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and cultured cells.

Results

There are few reports in FAERS of hypertension in patients treated with omeprazole on bevacizumab. Based on the chart review, patients who used proton pump inhibitors (PPI) had a lower response to treatment than those who did not (response rate: 25% vs 50%). Furthermore, experiments on GEO and cell lines suggested that induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene expression by PPIs is the cause of the reduced therapeutic effect.

Conclusion

PPIs prevent hypertension in bevacizumab‐treated patients but may reduce bevacizumab's anti‐tumoral effects by inducing VEGF expression.

Patient and Provider Perspectives on Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors

The aim of the current study is to describe proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing trends in an older adult population and elucidate perspectives regarding PPI deprescribing. A retrospective chart review and a prospective cross-sectional analysis of provider and patient surveys were conducted. The retrospective chart review identified 107 patients age ≥65 who were prescribed PPI therapy. Nineteen patients on PPI therapy and 74 providers completed surveys regarding their perspectives on PPI deprescribing. PPI therapy was potentially inappropriate for 66% of patients based on dose, duration, and/or indication. Provider barriers to deprescribing included fear of outcomes, access to documentation, and uncertainty of current guidelines. This study illustrates the prevalence of long-term PPI use in geriatric patients without associated clinical indications, as well as perceived barriers to deprescribing. Long-term PPI use is associated with significant side effects; therefore, successful deprescribing must address these perceived barriers. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(10), 9-17.].

Peer-Led Education Expedites Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors for Appropriate Veterans

Costly proton pump inhibitors have been widely prescribed since the 1990s for prevention and treatment of ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evidence published since 2012 demonstrates risks associated with taking proton pump inhibitors for longer than 8 weeks. Primary care providers mostly deprescribe proton pump inhibitors for persons not meeting criteria for long-term use. Many patients resist discontinuation.A 3-month evidence-based practice education project was conducted by a nurse practitioner to improve primary care provider peer deprescribing successes with appropriate patients in an outpatient California-based veteran primary care clinic. Fifteen primary care providers were pretested about usual care practices between 2 comparable clinics. Five primary care providers at the smaller clinic location were educated about long-term proton pump inhibitor use risks and introduced to 3 evidence-based practice guidelines using tapering techniques with follow-up care.A Canadian 2017 evidence-based practice proton pump inhibitor deprescribing guideline was proposed for translation into practice. Primary care providers voted to pilot this guideline, dependent upon nursing support. Primary care providers denied frustration with usual care practices, even as all were willing to try an evidence-based practice change between pre- and post-test surveys. Support for peer-led evidence-based practice on-site coaching increased from 87% to 100%. Tapering behavior increased from 67% to 100%, expediting improved long-term medication cessation.

Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Elderly Hospitalized Patient: Evaluating Appropriate Use and Deprescribing

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed for elderly patients without appropriate indication, or for longer durations than recommended. Objective: To review appropriateness of PPI use prior to and in hospital, and deprescribing rates across different hospital units. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients ≥65 years admitted to 5 acute care units: intensive care unit, acute care for elderly, orthopedics, surgery, and medicine. Patients who were "non-naive" (prehospital PPI use) or "naive" (new PPI initiated in hospital) users were included. For both groups, demographics, reason for admission, length of stay, comorbidities, name and number of home medications, PPI name, dose and indication, and PPI discharge instructions were collected. For naive patients, duration of in-hospital use and prescriber specialty was recorded. Results: Among non-naive patients (n = 377), for 37 patients (10%), the indication for a PPI was not appropriate, and for 92 patients (24%), the indication was unclear. Most patients had their home PPI continued while in hospital (87%) and at discharge (90%). Among naive (n = 93) patients, for 8 patients (9%), the indication for a PPI was not appropriate, and for 25 (27%) patients, the indication was unclear. PPI was prescribed to only 16 (18%) by the gastrointestinal consult service. Most patients had their new PPI continued at discharge (74%); only 7 (9%) were discharged with a plan to reassess PPI indication. Conclusion: PPIs are infrequently deprescribed during hospital admission, despite inappropriate or unclear indications for use. Thorough medication reconciliation, documentation of PPI indication and duration, and institutional focus on deprescribing are encouraged.

Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in an Academic, Primary Care Clinic: Quality Improvement Project

GOAL

The goal of this study was to reduce the percentage of inappropriately prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients aged 50 and older from 80% (baseline) to 60% within 12 months in an academic, internal medicine clinic.

BACKGROUND

The use of PPIs has increased drastically worldwide. Internal medicine clinic patients had inappropriate use of PPIs for an average of 4 to 5 years.

STUDY

A multidisciplinary quality improvement team used the Plan-Do-Study-Act Model of health care improvement and performed a root cause analysis to identify barriers to inappropriate use of PPIs. The outcome measure was the percentage of patients inappropriately prescribed PPI. Process measures were completion rates of PPI risk assessment and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Interventions included the creation of customized electronic health record templates and education to providers and patients. Analysis was performed using monthly statistical process control charts.

RESULTS

The average rate of PPI discontinuation was 51.1% (n=92/180), which corresponds to 30.0% inappropriate PPI usage within 12 months. The mean PPI discontinuation rate in the 1-year prestudy, study and 6 months poststudy period was 2.0%, 32.0%, and 49.7%, respectively. The mean esophagogastroduodenoscopy completion rate was 49.8% from the baseline of <30%.

CONCLUSIONS

We achieved a statistically significant and sustainable reduction of inappropriate PPI use to 30% from the baseline rates of 80% and surpassed our goal within 12 months. This quality improvement was unique as no pharmacy personnel was utilized in this process. The multifaceted strategies in a safety-net internal medicine clinic resulted in successful deprescribing of PPI and can be replicated in other setting.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Kidney: Implications of Current Evidence for Clinical Practice and When and How to Deprescribe

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), long thought to be safe, are associated with a number of nonkidney adverse health outcomes and several untoward kidney outcomes, including hypomagnesemia, acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, incident chronic kidney disease, kidney disease progression, kidney failure, and increased risk for all-cause mortality and mortality due to chronic kidney disease. PPIs are abundantly prescribed, rarely deprescribed, and frequently purchased over the counter. They are frequently used without medical indication, and when medically indicated, they are often used for much longer than needed. In this In Practice review, we summarize evidence linking PPI use with adverse events in general and adverse kidney outcomes in particular. We review the literature on the association of PPI use and risk for hypomagnesemia, acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, incident chronic kidney disease, kidney disease progression, end-stage kidney disease, and death. We provide an assessment of how this evidence should inform clinical practice. We review the impact of this evidence on patients' perception of risk, synthesize PPI deprescription literature, and provide our recommendations on how to approach PPI use and deprescription.

Health professionals' and researchers' opinions on conducting clinical deprescribing trials

While clinical deprescribing trials are increasingly being performed, there is no guidance on the optimum conduction of such studies. The aim of this survey was to explore the perspectives, attitudes, interests, barriers, and enablers of conducting clinical deprescribing trials among health professionals and researchers. An anonymous survey was developed, reviewed, and piloted by all investigators and informed by consultation with experts, as well as current deprescribing guidelines. The questions were formulated around current clinical trial frameworks and incorporated identified enablers and barriers of performing deprescribing studies. The survey was sent to members of Australian and international deprescribing, pharmacological, and pharmacy organizations, and other researchers published in deprescribing. A total of 96 respondents completed the survey (92.3% completion rate). Respondents indicated the main deprescribing trial rationale is to generate evidence to optimize patient-centered outcomes (79.2%). Common barriers identified included the time and effort required (18.2%), and apprehension of health professionals involved in trials (17.1%). Studies are enabled by positive attitudes toward deprescribing of treating prescribers (24.4%) and patients (20.9%). Classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were deemed the most appropriate methodology (93.2%). Sixty percent of participants indicated a good clinical practice framework is required to guide the conduct of deprescribing trials. There were no significant differences in responses based on previous experience in conducting clinical deprescribing trials. In conclusion, clinical deprescribing trials should be conducted to investigate whether deprescribing medications improves patient care. A future deprescribing trial framework should use classical RCTs as a model, ensure participant safety, and target patient-centered outcomes.

The effect of hospitalization on potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is a paucity of data on how hospitalization affects PIM use in older adults with CKD. Therefore, we aimed to measure the impact of hospitalization on PIM use in older CKD patients, and identify factors predicting PIM use.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in older adults (≥65 years) with CKD admitted to an Australian tertiary care hospital over a 6 month period. PIM use was measured, upon admission and at discharge, using the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and Beers criteria (2015 version) for medications recommended to be avoided in older adults and under certain conditions.

RESULTS

The median age of the 204 patients was 83 years (interquartile range (IQR): 76-87 years) and most were men (61%). Overall, the level of PIM use (MAI) decreased from admission to discharge (median [IQR]: 6 [3-12] to 5 [2-9]; p < .01]). More than half of the participants (55%) had at least one PIM per Beers criterion on admission, which was reduced by discharge (48%; p < .01). People admitted with a higher number of medications (β 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.88) and lower eGFR values (β - 0.11, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.04) had higher MAI scores after adjusting for age, sex and Charlson's comorbidity index.

CONCLUSIONS

PIMs were commonly used in older CKD patients. Hospitalization was associated with a reduction in PIM use, but there was considerable scope for improvement in these susceptible individuals.

Fracture risk of young adults receiving proton-pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists

INTRODUCTION

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine (type 2) receptor antagonists (H2RA) have the potential to interfere with calcium metabolism. Several authors have evaluated the effect of these medications on fracture incidence in older adults. A recent large epidemiologic study demonstrated a higher risk of fractures in young adults receiving PPI.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of PPI and H2RA use on fracture incidence in a large retrospective cohort of military recruits representative of general population of young adults.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 254 265 male and 234 670 female non-combat military conscripts ages 18-25. Subjects were divided into three groups by PPI use (no PPI use, 1-100 tablets and more than 100 tablets) and two groups by H2RA use (no H2RA use, any H2RA use). Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust fracture risk for age, BMI, education level, socio-economic level, ethnic origin, occupation and duration of follow-up in months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

At least one fracture during the study period.

RESULTS

Use of PPI and H2RA was not associated with an increased risk of fractures. In men, the predictors of an increased fracture risk were higher BMI (OR = 1.007, P < 0.001), origin from a developing country (OR = 1.15, P < 0.001) and service as a driver (OR = 1.11, P < 0.001). Higher education, higher socioeconomic status and service as an officer or as an administrative worker had a protective effect on fracture incidence. In women, fractures were associated with higher BMI (OR = 1.035, P < 0.001). Origin from a developed country, as well as service as an officer or an administrative worker was associated with lower fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between the use of PPI or H2-antagonists and fracture incidence in this retrospective cohort of healthy young military recruits.

Use of gastric-acid suppressants may be a risk factor for enteric peritonitis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Mounting evidence suggests that long-term use of gastric-acid suppressants (GASs) may be associated with adverse effects. Whether GAS use increases the risk of enteric peritonitis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) is not known. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between GAS use and enteric peritonitis in PD patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 23 January 2018 to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was an association between GAS use and enteric peritonitis in PD patients.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Six studies involving 829 people were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data showed that GAS use in PD patients was associated with an increased risk of enteric peritonitis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.57, I²  = 48%). Subgroup analyses based on GAS type revealed that histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H₂ RAs) might increase the risk of enteric peritonitis in PD patients (OR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.01-1.93; I²  = 8%), but proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might not (1.13; 0.72-1.77; 6; 34%).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Gastric-acid suppressants use might be a risk factor for enteric peritonitis in PD patients. In particular, H₂ RAs increased the risk of enteric peritonitis, but PPIs did not. Therefore, to prevent enteric peritonitis, H₂ RAs should probably be prescribed with caution for PD patients.

Proton Pump Inhibitors: What the Internist Needs to Know

This report reviews the physiology of gastric acid suppression by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and anti-inflammatory effects of PPIs that are independent of their acid-suppressive effects. Valid indications for PPI use are discussed, as are putative adverse effects of PPIs that have been identified through weak associations in observational studies that cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships. Although evidence supporting the validity of these adverse effects is weak, there is also insufficient evidence to dismiss the risks. The report emphasizes how PPIs frequently are prescribed inappropriately and encourages physicians to carefully consider the indication for PPI therapy in their patients.

Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a pharmacist's perspective

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal diagnosis, a leading reason for endoscopy and cause of potentially serious complications, resulting in significant individual and system-wide health burden. Approximately one quarter of people living in western countries have experienced GERD, and the prevalence appears to be on the rise. Risk factors for GERD include hiatus hernia, obesity, high-fat diet, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, pregnancy, genetics, and some medications. The cardinal symptoms of GERD are troublesome heartburn and regurgitation. GERD is identified by taking a patient-centered history and if necessary can be classified by endoscopic investigation. The role of the pharmacist in the management of GERD is to confirm the diagnosis by history taking, confirm there are no alarming signs or symptoms that require referral to a doctor, and recommendation of short-term therapy to control symptoms. Effective pharmacological treatments for GERD include antacids, alginate, histamine H2 receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors. This narrative review includes a comparison of the efficacy and safety of these treatments and pertinent information to help pharmacists advise patients with GERD on their appropriate use.