Deciphering the risk of developing liver cancer following gastric cancer diagnosis with genetic evidence: a Mendelian randomization analysis in an East Asian population

BACKGROUND

Liver cancer is a common second primary cancer in gastric cancer patients, but whether a gastric cancer diagnosis contributes to the development of second primary liver cancer remains contentious. This study aims to utilize Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the potential causal relationship between gastric cancer and second primary liver cancer from a genetic perspective.

METHODS

We extracted single nucleotide polymorphism for gastric cancer and liver cancer in the East Asian population from the Genome-Wide Association Studies database as instrumental variables and employed univariate and multivariate MR analysis to evaluate the causal relationship between gastric cancer and liver cancer. The robustness of the findings was ensured through heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Univariate MR analysis revealed that genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer in the East Asian population was significantly associated with an increased risk of liver cancer [Inverse-variance weighted (IVW): OR = 1.252, 95% CI 1.076-1.457, P = 0.004]. Multivariate MR analysis indicated that after adjusting for confounding factors, the significant positive causal relationship between gastric cancer and liver cancer remained robust (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, no causal relationship was observed between liver cancer diagnosis and the development of gastric cancer in the East Asian population (IVW: OR = 1.111, 95% CI 0.936-1.318, P = 0.228).

CONCLUSION

Genetic prediction results suggest that gastric cancer survivors might face an increased risk of developing second primary liver cancer, implying the potential value of routine liver cancer screening for gastric cancer survivors.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics - Update 2024

This guideline was developed in close collaboration with multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma were developed on the basis of systematic literature research and consensus conferences. Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the most dangerous form of skin tumor and accounts for 90 % of skin cancer mortality. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and must always be confirmed by dermoscopy. If melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is always required. Sequential digital dermoscopy and whole-body photography can be used in high-risk patients to improve the detection of early-stage melanoma. If available, confocal reflectance microscopy can also improve the clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma is classified according to the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. For thin melanomas up to a tumor thickness of 0.8 mm, no further diagnostic imaging is required. From stage IB, lymph node sonography is recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIB/C, whole-body examinations with computed tomography or positron emission tomography CT in combination with magnetic resonance imaging of the brain are recommended. From stage IIB/C and higher, a mutation test is recommended, especially for the BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to perform a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. A stage-based follow-up regimen is proposed, which in the experience of the guideline group covers the optimal requirements, although further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2026.

Three-Dimensional Total Body Photography, Digital Dermoscopy, and in vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Follow-Up Assessments of High-Risk Patients for Melanoma: A Prospective, Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

The combination of total body photography (TBP) and digital dermoscopy (DD) for monitoring patients with a high risk for melanoma can allow early detection of melanoma. This study aimed to examine if the use of three-dimensional (3D)-TBP, DD, and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) for regular monitoring of patients at high risk for melanoma was beneficial in comparison to monitoring using dermoscopy alone.

METHODS

The intervention group (IG) underwent 3D-TBP examinations at every visit, along with DD and/or RCM for diagnosis and/or monitoring of pigmented lesions if necessary. The control group (CG) underwent dermoscopy examinations alone.

RESULTS

A total of 600 patients (324 male and 276 female) were followed up over a median period of 23 months (mean, 2.85 visits) in the IG and 22 months (mean, 2.74 visits) in the CG (p = 0.009). DD and RCM monitoring were performed for 166 and 105 lesions, respectively. The number needed to treat (NNT) to diagnose melanoma with RCM was 2.83. The IG included more second primary melanomas (22 vs. 1, p = 0.022) and more excised nevi (186 vs. 10, p < 0.001), which consisted of more dysplastic nevi (137 vs. 2, p < 0.001). Among the melanomas diagnosed in the IG, three were diagnosed directly with RCM, nine with a combination of 3D-TBP and RCM, and 10 with dermoscopy alone.

CONCLUSION

Follow-up assessments with a combination of 3D-TBP, DD, and RCM led to the detection of more melanomas in comparison to the CG. The use of RCM reduced the NNT for melanocytic lesions.

Multiple Primary Melanoma: A Five-Year Prospective Single-Center Follow-Up Study of Two MC1R R/R Genotype Carriers

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary melanoma (MPM) is a diagnostic challenge even with ancillary imaging technologies available to dermatologists. In selected patients' phenotypes, the use of imaging approaches can help better understand lesion characteristics, and aid in early diagnosis and management.

METHODS

Under a 5-year prospective single-center follow-up, 58 s primary melanomas (SPMs) were diagnosed in two first-degree relatives, with fair skin color, red hair, green eyes, and personal history of one previous melanoma each. Patients' behavior and descriptive demographic data were collected from medical records. The information on the first two primary melanomas (PMs) were retrieved from pathology reports. The characteristics of 60 melanomas were collected from medical records, video dermoscopy software, and pathology reports. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) was performed prior to excision of 22 randomly selected melanomas.

RESULTS

From February 2018 to May 2023, two patients underwent a pooled total of 214 excisional biopsies of suspect lesions, resulting in a combined benign versus malignant treatment ratio (NNT) of 2.0:1.0. The number of moles excised for each melanoma diagnosed (NNE) was 1.7:1.0 and 6.9:1.0 for the female and male patient respectively. The in-situ melanoma/invasive melanoma ratio (IIR) demonstrated a higher proportion of in-situ melanomas for both patients. From June 2018 to May 2023, a total of 58 SPMs were detected by the combination of total body skin exam (TBSE), total body skin photography (TBSP), digital dermoscopy (DD), and sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI) via comparative approach. The younger patient had her PM one month prior to the second and third cutaneous melanomas (CMs), characterizing a case of synchronous primary CM. The male older relative had a total of 7 nonsynchronous melanomas.

CONCLUSIONS

This CM cohort is composed of 83.3% in-situ melanoma and 16.7% invasive melanoma. Both patients had a higher percentage of SPM with clinical nevus-like morphology (84.5%), global dermoscopic pattern of asymmetric multiple component (60.3%) and located on the lower limbs (46.6%). When RCM was performed prior to excision, 81% of SPM had features suggestive of malignancy. As well, invasive melanomas were more frequent in the lower limbs (40%). In the multivariate model, for the two high-risk patients studied, the chance of a not associated with nevus ("de novo") invasive SPM diagnosis is 25 times greater than the chance of a diagnosis of a nevus-associated invasive SPM.

Surveillance After a Previous Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis: A Scoping Review of Melanoma Follow-Up Guidelines

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous melanoma accounts for more than 70% of all skin cancer deaths. Follow-up surveillance is an integral part of melanoma patient care, to facilitate early detection of recurrences and subsequent primary melanomas. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of recently published melanoma surveillance guidelines from regional and national melanoma working groups.

METHODS

A systematic search for relevant studies in MEDLINE and Embase was conducted in September 2022 and was limited to publications from 2010 or later.

RESULTS

A total of 1047 articles were retrieved, and after abstract and full text review, 26 articles from 19 different organizations met inclusion criteria. Life-long annual skin surveillance with a physician was recommended by 53% (9/17) of guidelines. Routine laboratory investigations were recommended by 7/19 guidelines. Regional lymph node ultrasound was recommended by 9/16 guidelines, most often in stage IB or higher, and was optional in 7/16 for patients who met specific criteria. Surveillance with PET-CT or CT and MRI was recommended by 15 and 11 guidelines, respectively, most commonly in stage IIC or higher, with a variable frequency and total duration. Five out of 9 guidelines indicated a preference for skin surveillance to be completed with a dermatologist.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines were highly variable for many aspects of melanoma surveillance, which may be partly attributed to regional differences in healthcare workforce distribution and availability of imaging technologies. Further high-level studies are recommended to provide more evidence on the most effective clinical and imaging follow-up surveillance protocols.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is potentially the most dangerous form of skin tumor and causes 90% of skin cancer mortality. A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on CM diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and shall always be confirmed with dermatoscopy. If a melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is always required. Sequential digital dermatoscopy and full body photography can be used in high-risk patients to improve the detection of early melanoma. Where available, confocal reflectance microscopy can also improve clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma shall be classified according to the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Thin melanomas up to 0.8 mm tumor thickness do not require further imaging diagnostics. From stage IB onwards, examinations with lymph node sonography are recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIC onwards whole-body examinations with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) in combination with brain magnetic resonance imaging are recommended. From stage III and higher, mutation testing is recommended, particularly for BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to provide a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. There is no evidence to define the frequency and extent of examinations. A stage-based follow-up scheme is proposed which, according to the experience of the guideline group, covers the optimal requirements, but further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2024.

Incidence and Mortality of Malignant Melanoma in Relation to Dermatologist Density in Bavaria

INTRODUCTION

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive skin tumor with a good prognosis when treated in an early tumor stage, but has a poor prognosis with distant metastases. The incidence of malignant melanoma has increased continuously over the last decades, with little change in mortality. One explanation for this is that melanomas are increasingly detected in early stages, especially after the establishment of statutory skin cancer screening in 2008, which allows a free skin examination every 2 years for people older than 35 years.

METHODS

In this study incidence and mortality of malignant melanoma were correlated with the dermatologist density in Bavarian administrative regions. In addition, the incidence data were compared before and after the introduction of statutory skin cancer screening.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the incidence of malignant melanoma and dermatologist density (r = 0.258, p = 0.044), but no correlation between mortality and dermatologist density (r = 0.201, p = 0.121). Similarly, the increase of malignant melanoma incidence following the introduction of statutory skin cancer screening in 2008 was independent of dermatologist density (r = 0.021, p = 0.873).

CONCLUSION

The dermatologist density in Bavaria correlates positively with the incidence of malignant melanoma. Despite an increased incidence, mortality was not elevated in the respective administrative regions.

Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up

Cancer staging is the process determining to which extent a cancer has spread and where it is located in the body. A thorough staging is of utmost importance, not only because it provides the most accurate prognostic estimation, but also because several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choice and the follow-up strategy, vary according to the tumor's stage. The current staging system for melanoma is based on the 8^th edition of TNM classification issued by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) in 2017. It includes a clinical and a pathological staging, both consisting of 5 stages (0-IV). The stage of a melanoma is determined by several factors, among which the Breslow thickness, the pathological presence or absence of ulceration in the primary tumor, the presence and the number of tumor-involved regional lymph nodes, the presence or absence of in-transit, satellite and/or microsatellite metastases, and the presence of distant metastases. Following melanoma diagnosis, an accurate medical workup, in line with the stage and the physical examination, should be performed. A continuous patient monitoring is fundamental to detect a potential relapse or a second primary melanoma and should be lifelong. However, there is still no universally adopted follow-up strategy program and different follow-up schemes have been suggested. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate different follow-up protocols according to the adopted therapy, as novel recent therapies (targeted and immunotherapies) are being increasingly used. Key MessagesProper staging is of utmost importance because it provides accurate prognostic estimation. Several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choice and the follow up strategy, are based on the tumor stage.Physical examination during staging procedure and follow-up visits are important to avoid unnecessary imaging and laboratory tests that could increase the patients' anxiety. A personalized approach taking into consideration the patient's risk factors, is strongly recommended.Melanoma patients should be kept under surveillance lifelong due to an increased risk of developing a second primary melanoma and the risk of recurrence. Higher intensity follow-up strategies during the first 5 years are recommended due to higher rates of regional or distant relapse.

Canadian Melanoma Conference Recommendations on High-Risk Melanoma Surveillance: A Report from the 14th Annual Canadian Melanoma Conference; Banff, Alberta; 20-22 February 2020

Introduction: There are a lack of established guidelines for the surveillance of high-risk cutaneous melanoma patients following initial therapy. We describe a novel approach to the development of a national expert recommendation statement on high-risk melanoma surveillance (HRS). Methods: A consensus-based, live, online voting process was undertaken at the 13th and 14th annual Canadian Melanoma Conferences (CMC) to collect expert opinions relating to “who, what, where, and when” HRS should be conducted. Initial opinions were gathered via audience participation software and used as the basis for a second iterative questionnaire distributed online to attendees from the 13th CMC and to identified melanoma specialists from across Canada. A third questionnaire was disseminated in a similar fashion to conduct a final vote on HRS that could be implemented. Results: The majority of respondents from the first two iterative surveys agreed on stages IIB to IV as high risk. Surveillance should be conducted by an appropriate specialist, irrespective of association to a cancer centre. Frequency and modality of surveillance favoured biannual visits and Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (PET/CT) with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among the systemic imaging modalities available. No consensus was initially reached regarding the frequency of systemic imaging and ultrasound of nodal basins (US). The third iterative survey resolved major areas of disagreement. A 5-year surveillance schedule was voted on with 92% of conference members in agreement. Conclusion: This final recommendation was established following 92% overall agreement among the 2020 CMC attendees.

Measuring the horizontal and vertical growth rates of superficial spreading melanoma: a pilot study with sequential digital dermoscopy

BACKGROUND

Some authors have hypothesized that the initial kinetics of the primary melanoma (MM) growth could reflect its biologic aggressiveness. The aim of this study was to pilot a measure of the horizontal vs. vertical growth of superficial spreading melanomas (SSM).

METHODS

The dermoscopic images of twenty-three consecutive MMs (17 SSMs and 6 MMs in situ), excised after digital sequential dermoscopy, were reviewed. We built up two indexes: 1) dROG (digital Rate of Growth) defined as Breslow thickness/(t1-tR), where t1 was the reported time of the first dermoscopic image acquisition and tR was the reported time of the acquisition before the lesion excision; 2) lHGR (linear Horizontal Growth Rate) took into account the greater axis of the lesion at two time points, at the time (t1) of the first image acquisition (D1) and before (tR) lesion excision (DR). The index was computed as (DR-D1)/(t1-tR). We built up the Composite Rate of Growth index (cROG) calculated as dROG/lHRG. If the value of cROG is <1 the superficial growth is prevalent on the vertical growth, and if the value is >1 the vertical growth is prevalent on the superficial growth.

RESULTS

In 82.6% of lesions the horizontal growth was prevalent on the vertical growth, and in 17.4% of cases the vertical growth was equal or prevalent on the superficial growth.

CONCLUSIONS

A small proportion of SSMs with a slow horizontal growth could have a precocious vertical growth. Other larger studies are needed to confirm this observation.