Translating the WHA resolution in a member state: towards a German programme on 'Destigmatization' for individuals with visible chronic skin diseases

Implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis: An expert recommendation

Psoriasis causes detriment in a person's physical, mental and social health which impairs their quality of life (QoL). However, the current psoriasis management may not adequately address all relevant health domains. Since the goal of healthcare is to restore or maintain health, health outcomes should include all areas of the patient's overall health. Life satisfaction, QoL and patient well-being are essential to a comprehensive approach to the disease. With the inclusion of more people-centred policies, care of patients with psoriasis should evolve towards a holistic and integrated assessment of the disease impact, including subjective measures of well-being in order to encompass all aspects of health. The main objective of this expert review is to give the concept of well-being a place as an entity within the holistic therapeutic approach for patients with psoriasis. Identifying and defining common goals beyond the skin with the patient and testing them throughout the course of treatment will benefit and enhance treatment success. We propose a series of recommendations for application in clinical practice, providing tangible clinical guidance for implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis. Among the recommendations are the need to initially listen to the patient, to know their level of empowerment or what they want to achieve, their preferences in decision making, the evaluation of not only the physical but also the emotional impact of the disease (well-being), the definition of the aspects that can generate a cumulative deterioration of the disease throughout life, and a continuous assessment of the patient's preferences with the opinion of the expert clinician and the integration of the knowledge of external clinical evidence.

[Stigmatization and social anxiety in patients with skin diseases]

Stigmatization of patients with skin diseases has only recently attracted more attention in research. However, both external stigmatization by society and self-stigmatization by the affected patients are widespread in patients with skin diseases. Many studies show that in this group of patients, the experience of both kinds of stigmatization is associated with psychosocial burden, such as social anxiety. This is often independent of the visibility of skin lesions. The psychosocial burden of affected individuals may lead to psychological comorbidities, such as depression or anxiety disorders, making it important to screen patients in dermatologic settings for the presence of these conditions. Interventions to reduce external and self-stigmatization have been developed, but more randomized controlled trials are needed to test the effects of such interventions.

The Potential of Instagram to Reduce Stigmatization of People with Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Psoriasis is a stigmatized skin disease. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate an Instagram based stigma-reduction intervention targeting daily Instagram users aged 18 to 49 years without psoriasis. After stratification for baseline characteristics (t0), stigmatization of psoriasis was assessed using a questionnaire and a photo-rating task immediately before (t1) and after (t2) the intervention and two weeks post-intervention (t3). Data from 54 participants, recruited in a university setting and via Instagram, were analysed. For 10 min between t1 and t2, the intervention group (n = 26) and the control group (n = 28) scrolled through two different Instagram accounts. Psoriasis-sensitizing content was displayed to the intervention group while beauty-glorifying posts were shown to the control group. Results indicated significantly less Disease-related Misconceptions in the intervention group in comparison to the control group at t2 (U = 145.50, Z = -3.79, p < 0.001) and at t3 (U = 177.00, Z = -3.25, p = 0.003). Moreover, the intervention group showed a significant reduction over time in Stereotype Endorsement (F(2, 50) = 13.40, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.35) and Disease-related Misconceptions (χ2(2) = 12.64, p = 0.002). These findings suggest that addressing psoriasis on Instagram has the potential to effectively reduce the related stigmatization. Further studies are necessary to assess the impact of social media on stigmatization concerning psoriasis in more depth.

Patient Unique Stigmatization Holistic tool in dermatology (PUSH-D): Development and validation of a dermatology-specific stigmatization assessment tool

BACKGROUND

The skin plays an important role in establishing interpersonal relationships, and thus visible skin disorders, which have a significant impact on physical appearance, influence other people's behaviours and attitudes.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a dermatologic-specific questionnaire to evaluate stigmatization in individuals with visible skin conditions.

METHODS

Items were generated by a verbatim report based on qualitative interviews with patients with various dermatologic conditions. Subsequently, a study was implemented for psychometric analysis. A dermatology-specific stigmatization questionnaire (PUSH-D) was refined via item reduction according to inter-question correlations, consensus among experts and exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency was determined by calculating Cronbach's α. Concurrent validity was determined by calculating the correlation between PUSH-D and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES).

RESULTS

From a primary list of 22 items, PUSH-D was reduced to a 17-item questionnaire, covering two pertinent dimensions based on the exploratory factor analysis. Construct validity was demonstrated, and PUSH-D showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.9). PUSH-D correlated strongly with the DLQI 0.72 (p < 0.001) and moderately with the RSES 0.49 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PUSH-D allows a comprehensive view of the degree of stigmatization in visible skin disorders, as well as the comparability of stigmatization levels across various skin conditions.

Medicinal Treatment of Elderly Psoriasis Patients before and after Entering a Nursing Home

Psoriasis (PS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, and it increasingly appears also in the elderly population. There is a rising interest in drug therapy for PS, especially for people receiving care in nursing homes (NH). Which PS-related drugs are prescribed in the time before nursing home admission (NHA), and to what extent does the supply of drugs change after NHA? Which specialties prescribe PS-related drugs? Statutory health insurance data were examined for people with PS, aged ≥ 65 years, who were newly admitted to a NH in the period 2011-2014 and observed for one year before and after NHA. Changes in prescription prevalence (pre-post comparison) were examined for significant differences. Prescriptions of PS-relevant drugs were measured by defined daily dose and stratified according to the prescribing specialist group. The analysis included 718 insured persons with PS (76.2% female, mean age 83.3 years). Systemic therapeutics played a minor role (pre: 2.6% vs. post: 2.1%) in drug therapy. Topical steroids had a high share of about 40% in the pre-post comparison. Overall, the proportion of people with PS who received treatment remained at a comparable level before and after NHA. A structured assessment of the skin is crucial, specifically in people with cognitive impairment.

A Structured Intervention for Medical Students Significantly Improves Awareness for Stigmatisation in Visible Chronic Skin Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial

People with visible skin diseases often experience stigmatisation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new intervention for medical students to counter the stigmatisation of people with skin diseases. The intervention was evaluated using a randomised controlled design. Effectiveness was assessed at 3 time points. Data from 127 participants were analysed. Regarding the outcome “social distance”, a significant difference between the measurement points was observed for the intervention group (χ²(2) = 54.32, p < 0.001), which also showed a significant effect on agreement with negative stereotypes (F(1.67, 118.67) = 23.83, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.25). Regarding the outcome “agreement with disease-related misconceptions”, a significant difference between the measurement time points was observed for the intervention group (χ²(2) = 46.33, p < 0.001); similar results were found for the outcome “stigmatising behaviour” (F(1.86, 131.89) = 6.16, p = 0.003, partial η2 = 0.08). The results should encourage medical faculties to invest in such courses in order to prevent stigmatisation of people with skin diseases.

Stigmatization in Patients With Psoriasis: A Mini Review

Psoriasis is a chronic and recurrent immune-related skin disease that often causes disfigurement and disability. Due to the visibility of lesions in patients and inadequate understanding of dermatology knowledge in the general public, patients with psoriasis often suffer from stigma in their daily lives, which has adverse effects on their mental health, quality of life, and therapeutic responses. This review summarized the frequently used questionnaires and scales to evaluate stigmatization in patients with psoriasis, and recent advances on this topic. Feelings of Stigmatization Questionnaire, Questionnaire on Experience with Skin Complaints, and 6-item Stigmatization Scale have been commonly used. The relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, disease-related variables, psychiatric disorders, quality of life, and stigmatization in patients with psoriasis has been thoroughly investigated with these questionnaires. Managing the stigmatization in patients with psoriasis needs cooperation among policymakers, dermatologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, researchers, and patients. Further studies can concentrate more on these existing topics, as well as other topics, including predictors of perceived stigmatization, stigmatization from non-patient groups, influence of biologics on stigmatization, and methods of coping with stigmatization.

Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures

Misconceptions about visible skin diseases are widespread, and patients often face discrimination and stigmatization due to their condition. The associated negative health and psychosocial consequences of stigmatization in skin diseases have prompted an increase in research activity in recent times, resulting in a wide variety of assessment measures. This study aimed at aggregating and evaluating evidence of psychometric properties and methodological quality of published measures to assess stigma in visible skin diseases. Studies assessing stigmatization in visible skin diseases were searched in four databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Embase) until February 2021. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Papers regarding development and/or validation of measures were identified by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (i) quantitative studies in (ii) populations with skin diseases using (iii) questionnaires explicitly assessing (iv) perceived or public stigmatization or discrimination available in (iv) English or German language. The COnsensus-based Standards of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate their psychometric properties and risk of bias. 35 studies using 21 instruments were identified. Twenty instruments focused on assessing the perceived reality of those affected by visible skin diseases, while public stigma was only assessed by two instruments. Twelve scales could be recommended for use, while nine instruments had the potential to be recommended after further studies have assessed their quality. Some limitations are to be noted. Only studies in English and German were included. Research on self-constructed instruments can lead to new validated instruments, but they were not included in the review at this point. Several validated instruments could be recommended for use. Future research is needed regarding the assessment of stigma across different visible skin diseases, in children and adolescents, and in the general public.

Pioneering Global Best Practices in Atopic Dermatitis: Results from the Atopic Dermatitis Quality of Care Initiative

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by unrelenting pruritus and recurrent eczematous lesions. It affects up to 15% of children and adolescents and up to 5% of adults and confers a high and multifactorial burden to patients, families, and society. With increasing awareness of this substantial burden, AD has become a priority for healthcare systems.

OBJECTIVE

The Atopic Dermatitis Quality of Care (ADQoC) Initiative set out to describe good practices for addressing the challenges that impede the management of AD.

METHODS

The Initiative carried out a literature review and surveyed 32 expert care centres, catalogued findings, and analysed and elucidated global challenges to AD care along with good practice implementations that can address them.

RESULTS

The four challenges to quality care for AD are: misconceptions about AD; delayed referral and access to AD specialists; poor patient access to AD treatments and poor adherence to medications; and managing the complexity of atopic dermatitis and its comorbidities. The Initiative highlighted five of ten good practice implementations as high priority for any AD care centre to focus: clinical assessment and diagnosis; a structured multidisciplinary care team; monitoring and evaluating care quality; patient education and communication; and collaboration and exchange with patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These implementations can provide benefits for patients, healthcare providers, and the healthcare system. They directly contribute to the efficacy of treatment; improved healthcare provider efficiency; improved education; and improved costs to healthcare systems. The Initiative was launched on https://atopicdermatitiscare.kpmg.co.uk/ to provide an easy-to-use educational platform.

Effectiveness of a structured short intervention against stigmatisation in chronic visible skin diseases: Results of a controlled trial in future educators

Background

Chronic visible skin diseases are highly prevalent, and patients affected frequently report feeling stigmatised. Interventions to reduce stigmatisation are rare.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured short intervention in reducing stigmatising attitudes towards psoriasis in future educators.

Methods

The intervention consisted of four components: (1) self‐reflection, (2) education on skin diseases, (3) contact between participants and a person with psoriasis and (4) practising of knowledge via case studies. A quasi‐experimental, pre–post study design was chosen with a nonrandomized contemporaneous control group that attended regular lessons. The main outcomes were participants' desire for social distance, stereotype endorsement, illness‐related misconceptions and intended behaviour. Intervention effects were analysed using mixed repeated‐measures analysis of variance, with Bonferroni post‐hoc tests for pairwise comparisons.

Results

The sample consisted of 221 students attending vocational training as educators (n = 118 intervention group, n = 103 control group). While no effect of the intervention was found in social distance, small to large effect sizes were observed for intended behaviour (r = .14), illness‐related misconceptions (r = .28) and stereotype endorsement (r = .42). The intervention group reported significantly higher satisfaction with the seminar compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Overall, the short intervention was effective at reducing stigmatising attitudes in future educators. In perspective, revised versions could help in reducing stigmatisation in various demographics and promote patient empowerment by acknowledging and including them as experts on their own behalf.

Patient or Public Contribution

Patient advocate groups were consulted and involved in the superordinate destigmatization research programme and intervention.

ActiPso: definition of activity types for psoriatic disease: A novel marker for an advanced disease classification

BACKGROUND

Assessment of psoriasis is exclusively done measuring severity using somatic scores such as the psoriasis area and severity index or patient-reported outcomes such as the dermatology life quality index. There is no established tool to measure a patient's individual psoriasis activity over time.

OBJECTIVES

Development of a new tool to classify psoriasis activity types.

METHODS

Open patient interviews were performed and adapted in several steps and by using different groups of patients. Wording of the tool's axis and description how to use it was optimized with the input of patients. The final ActiPso tool was used in a prospective study in psoriasis patients.

RESULTS

Four activity types could be identified describing psoriasis intensity (e.g. severity, itch, pain) over one typical year and an event/trigger type describing flares. In the study in 586 psoriasis patients of the 536 patients eligible for analysis 40.9% self-classified as type 1 ('stable'), 22.6% as type 2 ('unstable'), 30.6% as type 3 ('winter type') and 6.0% as type 4 ('summer type'), respectively. Flares of psoriasis as identified by the event/trigger type were reported in 36.1% of patients with activity type 1, 67.8% with type 2, 73.8% of type 3 and 59.4% of type 4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Interviewed patients were able to describe their course of psoriatic disease and to name potential triggering factors. By doing so, activity types of psoriasis were defined for the first time and the importance of events/triggers for flares described and integrated into ActiPso types as a basis for advanced patient-centric management. A limitation of ActiPso is that in regions with no seasonal variations types 3 and 4 may not apply.

Quality of psoriasis care in Germany - results from the nationwide health care studies PsoHealth 2004-2017

BACKGROUND

In the study series PsoHealth first data from 2004/05 showed a poor quality of health care for psoriasis in Germany. Most patients lacked sufficient care and only a minor proportion received systemic drugs. Since 2007, a national psoriasis programme has been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To analyse the quality of health care for psoriasis in the most recent PsoHealth4 survey 2016/17, (2) to compare health care quality indicators with prior assessments since 2004/05.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The recent cross-sectional PsoHealth4 survey was conducted 2016/17, and three preceding studies were performed in 2004/05, 2007 and 2013/14, each including at least 1500 patients. The common set of quality indicators included disease severity (PASI and proportion of patients with PASI > 20, indicating high severity), quality of life (DLQI and proportion of patients with DLQI > 10, indicating strong impairments in quality of life), systemic therapy and inpatient treatment of the last five years.

RESULTS

Between December 2015 and December 2017, n = 1827 patients from 93 dermatological centres were included in the most recent survey (mean age: 50.8 ± 14.6 years, 45.2% female). 7.3% showed a PASI > 20, compared to 17.8% in 2004/05. 21.4% reported a DLQI > 10, compared to 34.0% in 2004/05. 57.6% of all participants stated to have received a systemic therapy at least once within the last five years, compared to 32.9% in 2004/05. 18.0% received inpatient hospital treatment at least once within the last five years, compared to 26.9% in 2004/05.

CONCLUSION

A remarkable improvement in the health care quality for psoriasis patients in Germany within the past 12 years can be assumed. Major determinants could be the innovation shift which included programmes such as the S3 guideline, a consensus on treatment goals, national health care goals for psoriasis and higher utilisation of innovative drugs.

Stigma in visible skin diseases - a literature review and development of a conceptual model

The burden of visible skin diseases (VSDs) includes not only physical symptoms but also psychosocial consequences such as depression, anxiety, impaired quality of life and low self-esteem. Stigmatization was shown to play a major role in people with skin diseases. The aim of the study was to review the evidence for the components, drivers and impacts of (self-)stigma, and to organize the data into a series of conceptual models. A targeted literature search was conducted to identify studies on (self-)stigma in relation to VSD. Conceptual models of stigma in VSDs were developed from existing generic conceptual models for VSD and of generic conceptual models of stigma and were refined after discussion with a board of experts, patient advocacy groups, clinicians and researchers. A total of 580 references were identified, of which 56 references were analysed and summarized. Two conceptual models of stigma were identified: one with external stigma and self-stigma dimensions, the other for self-stigma in mental health. These models were adapted to allow a complete description of stigma in VSDs. For this, a distinction was made between 'discrimination' and 'impact'. Finally, five models were developed: macro-overview; stigma, impact and socio-demographics; stigma, impact and disease characteristics; stigma, impact and quality of life; and stigma, impact and coping. Gaps were identified in available quantitative evidence. To our knowledge, this is the first conceptual model of stigma in VSDs. The model will help to standardize evaluation of stigma and to enhance empirical evaluation of anti-stigma interventions in VSDs. Further research should be conducted to develop a more complete model in stigma due to significant gaps in existing evidence, particularly including the stigma in others (external stigma) and also to cover a broader range of VSDs as their impact on particular dimensions of stigma differs.

Always Online? Internet Addiction and Social Impairment in Psoriasis across Germany

With the World Health Organization (WHO) demanding further investigation of the social impairment and psychosocial burden of psoriasis, a first study identified a high prevalence of Internet addiction. The aim of this study was to assess social impairment and estimate the occurrence of Internet addiction along with depression, cigarette smoking, and alcohol dependency in individuals with psoriasis recruited online in a people-centered care approach. A cross-sectional online survey was carried out across Germany between March 2019 and June 2019. The questionnaire contained information on social impairment, smoking habits, as well as validated questionnaires on Internet addiction, depression, and alcohol dependency. Overall, 460 individuals (62.4% female; mean age: 45.9 ± 13.7 years) with psoriasis were included. Of those, 406 (88.3%) stated to be at least rarely socially impaired. The positive screening rate for Internet addiction was 8.5%. Furthermore, 40.0% had positive screenings for depression, 17.1% for alcohol dependency, and 32.6% for daily smoking. Positive screenings for Internet addiction and alcohol dependency were substantially more frequent in individuals with psoriasis than in the German general population. In order to meet the demands of the WHO, Internet addiction could be considered as a potential comorbidity in psoriasis and a focus on people-centered care is advisable for further research.

Perception and determinants of stigmatization of people with psoriasis in the German population

BACKGROUND

Perception of psoriasis in the general population is characterized by knowledge deficits and prejudice against those affected. The extent and possible predictors of stigmatizing attitudes remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to assess prejudices and stigmatization of people with psoriasis and to identify sociodemographic and attitude-related variables accounting for stigmatization.

METHODS

Representative telephone surveys of 2004 (in 2017) and 2001 (in 2018) adults using a standardized questionnaire. Descriptive analyses were applied to living area, age, gender, educational status, general knowledge and attitudes about psoriasis. Logistic regression analyses were carried out to determine which variables are associated with the assessment of prejudices of 'others' against people with psoriasis. Those prejudices were specified by the following statements: 'they should take better care of themselves', 'don't want to touch people with psoriasis' and 'disgusted by psoriasis'.

RESULTS

The majority of those surveyed (74%) believe that people with psoriasis are disadvantaged. Similarly, a majority (69%) said that most people find psoriasis disgusting, do not want to touch people with psoriasis (59%) and think that people with psoriasis need to take better care of themselves (45%). 'Willing to enter a relationship with an affected person' (OR = 0.330, P = 0.029), higher age (OR = 1.027, P <0.001) and male gender (OR = 1.263, P = 0.034) proved to be significantly associated with 'psoriasis is disgusting'. Education (OR = 1.648, P = 0.016) and lower age (OR = 0.847, P  <0.001) are significantly associated with 'they need to take better care of themselves'.

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that stigmatization of skin diseases is still entrenched. This overview shows the need for interventions against stigmatization of those affected. Results imply that gender, age and education level and related health literacy of the target groups of respective interventions should be taken into account.