Real-world outcomes and drug survival of brodalumab: results from the German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest

Brodalumab, a human monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-17 receptor A (IL-17RA), is approved in the US and EU for treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although brodalumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety vs placebo in clinical trials of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), real-world evidence is needed to evaluate long-term effectiveness and safety of brodalumab in routine care. This interim analysis of the German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest examined patient profiles, treatment outcomes, and drug survival of first-time use of brodalumab for 12 months in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis (with and without PsA) (data cutoff: June 30, 2021). Clinician and patient-reported outcomes of the total cohort (n = 227; PsA, n = 38) indicated a rapid response to brodalumab treatment within the first 3 months, which was maintained up to 12 months. The overall one-year drug survival rate was 76.2%, the mean time to discontinuation was 8.3 months. Reasons for discontinuation were mainly loss/lack of effectiveness, followed by adverse events, contraindication and skin clearance. In sum, brodalumab demonstrated rapid and sustained effectiveness and was well-tolerated over 12 months in German patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and PsA in a real-world setting.

Psoriasis as a Systemic Disease

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis was long regarded as an inflammatory disease limited to the skin. Data from dermatologic, rheumatologic and cardiologic research now show it to be a systemic disease, for which the term psoriatic disease is used.

METHODS

This paper is based on a selective literature search with special attention to the findings of clinical trials and other current publications, as well as the recommendations of international guidelines.

RESULTS

Immunologically mediated inflammation of the skin, arteries, bones, and joints is a central feature of psoriatic disease. Other diseases that are known to be associated with psoriatic disease include hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and depression. The main risk factor for the development of psoriatic disease is obesity, which also increases the likelihood of psoriatic arthritis. The main known trigger factors are stress, infection, and, less commonly, medication. Psoriatic disease is characterized by complex genetics and by a characteristic pattern of inflammation that involves elements of both innate and acquired immunity and, in particular, the cytokines interleukin 17 and 23. The inflammatory processes underlying psoriatic disease can now be targeted with modern biologic and other therapies.

CONCLUSION

In view of the complexity of psoriatic disease, structured management is now recommended so that physicians and patients can work together to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Orismilast in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Efficacy and safety from a 16-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-finding, and phase 2b trial (IASOS)

BACKGROUND

Orismilast is a novel oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) B/D inhibitor being investigated as a potential treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of orismilast modified-release formulation in moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized (1:1:1:1 to 20, 30, 40 mg orismilast or placebo, twice daily), double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b, 16-week, dose-ranging study evaluated orismilast in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (NCT05190419). Efficacy end points were analyzed using multiple imputation.

RESULTS

Of 202 randomized patients, baseline characteristics were balanced across arms, except greater severe disease proportions for orismilast vs placebo. Orismilast showed significant improvements in the primary end point, percentage change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), from baseline to week 16 (orismilast -52.6% to -63.7% and placebo, -17.3%; all P <.001). Greater proportions receiving orismilast achieved PASI75 (39.5%-49.0%; P <.05) and PASI90 (22.0%-28.3%; P <.05 for 20 and 40 mg) vs placebo (PASI75, 16.5% and PASI90, 8.3%) at week 16. Safety findings were as expected with PDE4 inhibition; dose-dependent tolerability effects observed.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size, disease severity imbalance between groups, limited duration and diversity in study population.

CONCLUSION

Orismilast demonstrated greater efficacy vs placebo and a safety profile in line with PDE4 inhibition.

Implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis: An expert recommendation

Psoriasis causes detriment in a person's physical, mental and social health which impairs their quality of life (QoL). However, the current psoriasis management may not adequately address all relevant health domains. Since the goal of healthcare is to restore or maintain health, health outcomes should include all areas of the patient's overall health. Life satisfaction, QoL and patient well-being are essential to a comprehensive approach to the disease. With the inclusion of more people-centred policies, care of patients with psoriasis should evolve towards a holistic and integrated assessment of the disease impact, including subjective measures of well-being in order to encompass all aspects of health. The main objective of this expert review is to give the concept of well-being a place as an entity within the holistic therapeutic approach for patients with psoriasis. Identifying and defining common goals beyond the skin with the patient and testing them throughout the course of treatment will benefit and enhance treatment success. We propose a series of recommendations for application in clinical practice, providing tangible clinical guidance for implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis. Among the recommendations are the need to initially listen to the patient, to know their level of empowerment or what they want to achieve, their preferences in decision making, the evaluation of not only the physical but also the emotional impact of the disease (well-being), the definition of the aspects that can generate a cumulative deterioration of the disease throughout life, and a continuous assessment of the patient's preferences with the opinion of the expert clinician and the integration of the knowledge of external clinical evidence.

Characterization of patients with psoriatic arthritis in dermatologic and rheumatologic care: analysis of two registries

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease affecting the musculoskeletal system, skin and nails. The aim is to characterize sociodemographic and clinical patient profiles documented in dermatologic and rheumatologic care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 704 patients with PsA from the dermatological Psoriasis Registry PsoBest (PB) and 1066 patients from the rheumatological disease registry RABBIT-SpA (RS) were analyzed. Comparable anamnestic and clinical variables were identified and descriptively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 51.7 years in PB and 51.9 in RS. Disease duration of psoriasis was longer, mean cutaneous severity was higher in PB. However, more patients in RS vs. PB had tender joints and swollen joints. Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index was higher in PB and mean Health Assessment Questionnaire in RS. Patient reported global disease activity and pain were lower in PB. IL-23 inhibitors were used more frequently in PB, and TNF inhibitors in RS.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical specialization was associated with different clinical and treatment patterns of PsA. This may indicate a selection by dominant manifestation of psoriatic disease and potentially by effects of health care access. Psoriatic arthritis should be treated in a multidisciplinary approach considering all facets of this complex disease.

Charakterisierung von Patienten mit Psoriasisarthritis in der dermatologischen und rheumatologischen Versorgung: Analyse von zwei Registern: Characterization of patients with psoriatic arthritis in dermatologic and rheumatologic care: analysis of two registries

Hintergrund und Zielsetzung

Die Psoriasisarthritis (PsA) ist eine chronische systemische Entzündungskrankheit, die den Bewegungsapparat, die Haut und die Nägel betrifft. Ziel ist es, soziodemografische und klinische Patientenprofile zu charakterisieren, die in der dermatologischen und rheumatologischen Versorgung dokumentiert werden.

Patienten und Methodik

Es wurden die Daten von 704 PsA‐Patienten aus dem dermatologischen Psoriasis‐Register PsoBest (PB) und 1066 Patienten aus dem rheumatologischen Krankheitsregister RABBIT‐SpA (RS) analysiert. Vergleichbare anamnestische und klinische Variablen wurden identifiziert und deskriptiv ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse

Das Durchschnittsalter betrug 51,7 Jahre bei PB und 51,9 Jahre bei RS. Die Krankheitsdauer der Psoriasis war länger und der mittlere Schweregrad der Hauterkrankung war bei den Patienten in PB höher, jedoch hatten mehr Patienten in RS schmerzende und geschwollene Gelenke. Der mittlere Dermatology Life Quality Index war bei den Patienten in PB höher und der mittlere Health Assessment Questionnaire bei den Patienten in RS. Die von den Patienten angegebene globale Krankheitsaktivität und die Schmerzen waren in PB geringer. IL‐23‐Inhibitoren wurden in PB häufiger eingesetzt, TNF‐Inhibitoren bei RS.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die klinische Spezialisierung wurde mit unterschiedlichen Krankheitsbildern und Behandlungsmustern der PsA in Verbindung gebracht. Dies könnte auf eine Selektion nach der vorherrschenden Manifestation der Psoriasis‐Erkrankung und möglicherweise auf Auswirkungen des Zugangs zur Gesundheitsversorgung hinweisen. Die PsA sollte in einem multidisziplinären Ansatz behandelt werden, der alle Facetten dieser komplexen Erkrankung berücksichtigt.

Depression, a major comorbidity of psoriatic disease, is caused by metabolic inflammation

Psoriatic disease is a chronic, systemic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder comprising three major domains, skin, vascular and bone/joint inflammation. It is known for a long time that psoriatic disease is associated with a number of conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes (metabolic syndrome) and depression. Up to one out of five people with psoriasis show concomitant depression. In the past, this was attributed to psychological stress of suffering from a chronic condition that is often visible and itchy, leading to stigmatization and adding to a significant burden of disease. Recent data provide evidence that depression associated with psoriatic disease is linked to the specific inflammatory pattern with IL-23, IL-17 family cytokines, TNF, IL-6 and IL-8 causing neuroinflammation and subsequently depression or depressive behaviour and/or anxiety. Psoriatic disease shows a distinct pattern of immune cells (e.g. dendritic cells, Th17 cells, neutrophils), mediators (e.g. IL-17A/F, IL-23, TNF) and tissue-related factors in all major domains that is different from other inflammatory dermatoses. There is a striking similarity between the inflammatory pattern in psoriatic disease and neuroinflammation that leads to depression. A number of risk factors have been identified in psoriatic disease, the most important of which are obesity and tobacco smoking. Obesity is known as a major risk factor for depression and anxiety due to its inflammatory signature. Apart from psychotherapy and anti-depressive medication, targeted treatments for psoriasis, including TNF, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors, can improve depression/depressive symptoms. The review summarizes the current knowledge about depression as a comorbidity in psoriatic disease.

Rapid and sustained improvements in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment scores with spesolimab for treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis flares in the randomized, placebo-controlled Effisayil 1 study

BACKGROUND

Effisayil 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled study of spesolimab, which is an anti-IL-36 receptor antibody, in patients presenting with a generalized pustular psoriasis flare.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of spesolimab over the 12-week study.

METHODS

The primary endpoint of the study was Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) pustulation subscore of 0 at week 1. Patients (N = 53) were randomized (2:1) to receive a single intravenous dose of 900 mg spesolimab or placebo on day 1. Patients could receive open-label spesolimab for persistent flare symptoms on day 8.

RESULTS

Most patients receiving spesolimab achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 (60.0%) and GPPGA total score of 0 or 1 (60.0%) by week 12. In patients randomized to placebo who received open-label spesolimab on day 8, the proportion with GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 increased from 5.6% at day 8 to 83.3% at week 2. No factors predictive of spesolimab response were identified in patient demographics or clinical characteristics.

LIMITATIONS

The effect of initial randomization was not determined conventionally beyond week 1 due to patients receiving open-label spesolimab.

CONCLUSION

Rapid control of generalized pustular psoriasis flare symptoms with spesolimab was sustained over 12 weeks, further supporting its potential use as a therapeutic option for patients.

Skin Colonization with S. aureus Can Lead to Increased NLRP1 Inflammasome Activation in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

The role of NLRP1 inflammasome activation and subsequent production of IL-1 family cytokines in the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) is not clearly understood. Staphylococcus aureus is known to be associated with increased mRNA levels of IL1 family cytokines in the skin and more severe AD. In this study, the altered expression of IL-1 family cytokines and inflammasome-related genes was confirmed, and a positive relationship between mRNA levels of inflammasome sensor NLRP1 and IL1B or IL18 was determined. Enhanced expression of the NLRP1 and PYCARD proteins and increased caspase-1 activity were detected in the skin of patients with AD. The genetic association of IL18R1 and IL18RAP with AD was confirmed, and the involvement of various immune cell types was predicted using published GWAS and expression quantitative trait loci datasets. In keratinocytes, the inoculation with S. aureus led to the increased secretion of IL-1β and IL-18, whereas small interfering RNA silencing of NLRP1 inhibited the production of these cytokines. Our results suggest that skin colonization with S. aureus may cause the activation of the NLRP1 inflammasome in keratinocytes, which leads to the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 and thereby may contribute to the pathogenesis of AD, particularly in the presence of genetic variations in the IL-18 pathway.

Bimekizumab maintenance of response through three years in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the BE BRIGHT open-label extension trial

Background

Given the chronic nature of psoriasis and the loss of response that can be observed with therapies over time, it is important to understand the long-;term efficacy of new treatments.

Objective

To evaluate maintenance of Week 16 responses with bimekizumab treatment through Year 3, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Methods

Data were pooled from bimekizumab-treated patients in the 52-week (BE VIVID) and 56-week (BE READY and BE SURE) phase 3 studies, and their ongoing open-label extension (OLE), BE BRIGHT. Efficacy outcomes are reported through three years of bimekizumab treatment in patients with an efficacy response at Week 16. Missing data were imputed primarily using modified non-responder imputation (mNRI), with non-responder imputation and observed case data also reported.

Results

A total of 989 patients were randomized to bimekizumab at baseline in BE VIVID, BE READY, and BE SURE. At Week 16, 693 patients achieved ≥90% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90), 503 achieved 100% reduction from baseline in PASI (PASI 100), 694 achieved absolute PASI ≤2, and 597 achieved body surface area (BSA) ≤1%, and continued into the OLE. Of these, 93.0% maintained PASI 90, 80.8% maintained PASI 100, 94.0% maintained PASI ≤2, and 90.3% maintained BSA ≤1% responses through to three years of bimekizumab treatment (mNRI). Among Week 16 PASI 90 responders, 96.8% and 72.5% also achieved Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 and PASI 100 at Week 16, respectively, and 92.2% and 73.4% achieved these responses at Year 3 (mNRI). Among Week 16 PASI 100 responders, 76.3% also achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1 at Week 16, and DLQI 0/1 response increased with continuous bimekizumab treatment to 89.0% at Year 3 (mNRI).

Conclusions

High levels of clinical response were maintained through to three years of bimekizumab treatment in the vast majority of Week 16 responders. Long-term treatment with bimekizumab was efficacious, with important benefits on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Patient-reported well-being in value-based care using tildrakizumab in a real-world setting: protocol of a multinational, phase IV, 1-cohort prospective observational study (the POSITIVE study)

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that negatively impacts the quality of life of patients and their families. However, the most commonly used decision-making tools in psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), do not fully capture the impact of psoriasis on patients' lives. In contrast, the well-established 5-item WHO Well-being Index (WHO-5) assesses the subjective psychological well-being of patients. Moreover, while drug innovations became available for psoriasis, data on the impact of these therapies on patients' lives and their closest environment (family, physicians) are limited. This study will assess the effect of tildrakizumab, an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor, on the overall well-being of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Moreover, the long-term benefit of tildrakizumab on physicians' satisfaction and partners' lives of patients with psoriasis will be evaluated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This non-interventional, prospective, observational, real-world evidence study will involve multiple sites in Europe and approximately 500 adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab. Each patient will be followed for 24 months. The primary endpoint is well-being measured by the WHO-5 questionnaire. Key secondary endpoints include Physician's Satisfaction and partner's quality of life (FamilyPso). Other endpoints will evaluate skin-generic quality of life (DLQI-R), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), Treatment-related Patient Benefit Index 'Standard', 10 items (PBI-S-10) and work productivity and activity impairment due to psoriasis (WPAI:PSO). Statistical analyses will be based on observed cases. Multiple imputations will be performed as a sensitivity analysis, and adverse events will be reported.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will be conducted according to the protocol, which received ethics committee approval and applicable regulatory requirements of each participating country. The results will be disseminated through scientific publications and congress presentations.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04823247 (Pre-results).

Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with limited skin involvement, plaque psoriasis in special areas and impaired quality of life: Results from the EMBRACE randomized trial

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Manifestations of psoriasis in special areas are difficult to treat and are associated with a high disease burden and significant quality of life (QoL) impairment. Topical therapies may be inadequate for these patients, necessitating systemic treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of EMBRACE was to evaluate the impact on QoL, efficacy and safety of apremilast 30 mg BID in patients with limited skin involvement with plaque psoriasis manifestations in special areas and impaired QoL.

METHODS

EMBRACE (NCT03774875) was a phase 4, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational study. Patients had plaque psoriasis not controlled by topical therapy; lack of response, contraindication or intolerance to conventional first-line systemic therapy; psoriasis in ≥1 special area (including visible locations, scalp, nails, genital areas or palmoplantar areas); Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥3 to ≤10; and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) >10. The primary endpoint was DLQI response (≥4-point reduction) at Week 16.

RESULTS

Of 277 randomized patients (apremilast: n = 185; placebo: n = 92), 221 completed Week 16 (apremilast: n = 152; placebo: n = 69). The primary endpoint (≥4-point reduction in DLQI at Week 16) was met by significantly more patients receiving apremilast (73.3%) versus placebo (41.3%; p < 0.0001). Significantly greater improvement in affected body surface area (BSA) and PASI was observed with apremilast versus placebo at Week 16. There were also significantly greater improvements with apremilast versus placebo in itch numeric rating scale (-2.5 vs. -0.9, p < 0.0001) and skin discomfort/pain visual analog scale (-21.5 vs. -5.4, p = 0.0003) and greater achievement of Patient Benefit Index ≥1 (77% vs. 40%, p < 0.0001) at Week 16. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast significantly improved skin-related QoL in patients with limited skin involvement with plaque psoriasis in special areas and highly impaired QoL. The safety profile was consistent with prior apremilast studies.

Response to fumaric acid esters for plaque type psoriasis in real-world practice is largely independent of patient characteristics at baseline - a multivariable regression analysis from the German psoriasis registry PsoBest

OBJECTIVES

Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) are a well-established treatment option for long-term therapy of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This study examines effectiveness of FAEs for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in real-world practice at 12 months and if patient characteristics affect the odds of clinical response.

METHODS

A descriptive, multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted in a cohort drawn from the German registry PsoBest. Baseline patient characteristics were assessed as potential treatment effect modifiers.

RESULTS

444 patients (mean age 47.0 years, 39.0% female) were eligible for response analysis using nonresponder imputation at month 12. Of these, 39.6% achieved clinical response, i.e., Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤3 or skin clearance. In logistic regression analysis (R² = 0.114), only baseline PASI was a significant factor: patients with PASI <10 had a 4 times higher odds (p ≤ 0.001, OR 4.088), patients with PASI of 10-20 a twofold higher odds of response (p ≤ 0.044, OR 1.961) compared to those with PASI >20. Neither sex, age, body weight, disease duration, comorbidity nor pre-treatment had an impact on the odds of response (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

FAEs showed a favorable response at 12 months, largely independent of patient characteristics.

AB0952 Characterization of patients with psoriatic arthritis in dermatologic and rheumatologic care: an analysis of two disease registries

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the musculoskeletal system, skin and nails. Therapeutic management in Germany is usually provided by a dermatologist or rheumatologist.

Objectives

The aim is to characterize the socioeconomic and clinical patient profiles in dermatologic and rheumatologic settings.

Methods

Baseline data of patients with PsA from [1] the dermatological German Psoriasis Registry PsoBest (PB) and [2] the rheumatological German disease register RABBIT-SpA (RS) [2] were analyzed. For this purpose, comparable anamnestic and clinical variables collected in the period 10/2017 to 12/2020 were identified and descriptively analyzed. The analysis was carried out in each of the data-holding registers.

Results

1066 RS patients and 704 PB patients were included in the analysis (Table 1). The proportion of women was higher in the rheumatology setting (RS) (60% vs. 49%). Disease duration of psoriasis was longer in the dermatology setting (PB). Cutaneous severity was higher in PB, including affected body surface area and nail psoriasis. However, more patients in RS had tender joints and swollen joints. The physician-reported global disease activity was higher in RS. The mean DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) was higher in PB and the mean HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire) was higher in RS. Patient reported global disease activity and pain were lower in PB.

Table 1.

Baseline data of patients with PsA from the registers PsoBest and RABBIT-SpA included 10/2017 to 12/2020.

RABBIT-SpA(Rheumatology setting)PsoBest(Dermatology setting)N1066704Age, mean (SD)51.9 (12.2)51.7 (13.2)Female, n (%)637 (60)346 (49)Disease duration skin, mean (SD)14.3 (13.9)21.6 (16.0)Body surface area, mean (SD)8.5 (15.0)20.8 (19.8)Nail psoriasis, n (%)434 (41)407 (58)Tender joints, n (%)905 (85)498 (71)Swollen joints, n (%)708 (67)387 (55)Physician reported disease activity, mean (SD)5.2 (1.9)4.6 (2.7)DLQI, mean (SD)5.6 (6.2)12.2 (7.6)HAQ, mean (SD)0.9 (0.7)0.7 (0.6)Patient reported disease activity, mean (SD)5.7 (2.4)4.9 (2.9)Patient reported pain, mean (SD)5.5 (2.4)5.2 (2.8)bDMARD, n (%)751 (71)514 (73)TNF, n (%)346 (46)117 (23)IL17, n (%)351 (47)246 (48)IL23, n (%)54 (7)151 (29)tsDMARD, n (%)109 (10)47 (7)csDMARD, n (%)195 (18)142 (20)

Most of the patients received biologics at inclusion (RS: 71% and PB: 73%). In the dermatology setting IL23 inhibitors were used more frequently, whereas TNF inhibitors were used more frequently in the rheumatology setting.

Conclusion

The clinical specialization of the treating physician was associated with a different treatment and clinical status of patients with PsA. Our analysis showed that patients in the rheumatology setting more frequently had joint affections and lower functional status, whereas skin severity was worse in the dermatology setting, indicating selection effects of health care access. We hypothesize out that these differences may be biased due to different diagnostic and therapeutic routines in the specialized health care settings. Psoriatic arthritis should be treated in a multidisciplinary approach to take into account all facets of this complex disease.

References

[1]PMID: 24393314

[2]PMID: 30874933

Disclosure of Interests

Lisa Lindner Grant/research support from: RABBIT-SpA is supported by a joint, unconditional grant from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris., Matthias Augustin Grant/research support from: The PsoBest registry is/was supported by AbbVie, Almirall Hermal, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris. These companies do not have influence on the design of the registry, data collection, analyses, the publication decisions or development., Laura Kühl Grant/research support from: The PsoBest registry is/was supported by AbbVie, Almirall Hermal, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris. These companies do not have influence on the design of the registry, data collection, analyses, the publication decisions or development., Anja Weiß Grant/research support from: RABBIT-SpA is supported by a joint, unconditional grant from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris., Stephan Jeff Rustenbach Grant/research support from: The PsoBest registry is/was supported by AbbVie, Almirall Hermal, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris. These companies do not have influence on the design of the registry, data collection, analyses, the publication decisions or development., Frank Behrens: None declared, Martin Feuchtenberger: None declared, Ilka Schwarze: None declared, Ulrich Mrowietz: None declared, Diamant Thaçi: None declared, Kristian Reich Grant/research support from: The PsoBest registry is/was supported by AbbVie, Almirall Hermal, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris. These companies do not have influence on the design of the registry, data collection, analyses, the publication decisions or development., Anja Strangfeld Grant/research support from: RABBIT-SpA is supported by a joint, unconditional grant from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris., Anne Regierer Grant/research support from: RABBIT-SpA is supported by a joint, unconditional grant from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Viatris.

Zugang und Inanspruchnahme psychosomatischer Versorgung aus ärztlicher Sicht: Eine qualitative Interviewstudie

Hintergrund Chronisch entzündliche Hauterkrankungen sind häufig mit psychosozialen Beeinträchtigungen und einer reduzierten Lebensqualität vergesellschaftet. Ziel dieser Studie war es zu erfassen, wie spezialisiertes medizinisches Personal eines universitären Haut-Entzündungszentrums die Zugangswege und die Inanspruchnahme psychosomatischer Sondierungsgespräche oder Kurzzeitinterventionen bei PatientInnen mit chronisch entzündlichen Hauterkrankungen wahrnimmt.

Methoden Es wurden qualitative Erhebungen in Form von 10 Einzelinterviews mit medizinischem Personal durchgeführt, das zum Zeitpunkt der Befragung im Zentrum für entzündliche Hauterkrankungen der Uni-Hautklinik tätig war. Die Daten wurden inhaltsanalytisch mithilfe einer qualitativen Analysesoftware ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse Die Ergebnisse aus den geführten Einzelinterviews ergaben, dass die Einbindung einer psychosomatischen Versorgung innerhalb eines dermatologischen Entzündungszentrums vom ärztlichen Personal als durchweg positiv bewertet wurde. Die Option auf ein zeit- und zentrumsnahes Gesprächsangebot nimmt dabei eine besondere Rolle ein. Experten fühlen sich mit der ortsnahen Einbindung psychosomatischer Expertise sicherer im Umgang mit belasteten Patient*innen. Der holistische Ansatz scheint einen positiven Einfluss auf die individuelle Behandlung und die Beziehungsgestaltung mit den Patient*innen zu nehmen. Dabei zeigten sich keine wesentlichen Unterschiede im Geschlecht und über verschiedene Altersgruppen hinweg.

Diskussion Die Möglichkeit zur zentrumsnahen Anbindung von belasteten Patient*innen in Form von zusätzlichen psychosomatischen Sondierungsgesprächen wie auch dem Einsatz von adaptierten Kurzzeitinterventionen trägt zur holistischen Behandlung bei, scheint einen günstigen Einfluss auf den somatischen Behandlungsverlauf zu nehmen und unterstützt Ärzt*innen in ihrer Behandlung.

Generalized pustular psoriasis: overview of the status quo and results of a panel discussion

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, severe, potentially life-threatening, autoinflammatory, neutrophilic skin disease that may be accompanied by fever and leukocytosis. This paper describes the current state of knowledge on GPP in terms of classification, (differential) diagnosis and prevalence. We present a comparison of the genetics and pathoimmunology of GPP and psoriasis vulgaris with the central mechanisms of autoimmunology and autoinflammation. The currently available therapeutic options, expert recommendations for therapy, and data from early clinical trials investigating targeted therapies will be summarized. We present the results of our discussion with 13 experts for psoriasis vulgaris and GPP and give an integrated overview of indication and therapy based on our personal experience and present an outlook on further research questions. Collectively, this article highlights the high unmet need in GPP, as there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis or treatment to date and new treatment options will be of great therapeutic benefit to those affected.

Symptom Experience and Content Validity of the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP)

Introduction

We sought to understand key symptoms of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and to confirm the relevance to patients and content validity of the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) in GPP.

Methods

A targeted literature review and clinical expert interviews were conducted as background research. Patients were interviewed individually (involving concept elicitation and cognitive interviews), and a separate patient workshop was conducted to determine disease-specific symptoms of importance.

Results

Seven participants with moderate (n = 4), severe (n = 2), and mild (n = 1) GPP and clinician diagnosis were interviewed. During concept elicitation, all participants indicated that pustules may underlie other symptoms. Symptoms reported by all patients were pain, redness, itch, burning, and discomfort. The PSS symptoms of pain, itching, burning, and redness were reported by ≥ 86% of patients as most frequently experienced. Upon debriefing, the PSS was well understood. Relevance and importance of these symptoms was confirmed in the GPP patient workshop.

Conclusion

Participant feedback found the PSS measure to be relevant and easy to understand. The symptoms included in the instrument, pain, redness, itch, and burning, were most frequently reported, important, and well understood by patients. Study results provided support for the content validity of the PSS for use as endpoints in GPP clinical trials.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe rare disease, including redness and boils that sometimes come with fever and other general symptoms. This study asked patients with GPP about their key symptoms, and whether the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) is relevant to them as patients. The PSS is a questionnaire with the symptoms pain, itching, burning, and redness. We searched the literature and interviewed clinical experts to guide the patient interviews. Patients were recruited through clinical sites and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF). The interviews discussed GPP symptoms and the PSS questionnaire. Patients with GPP were also asked about commonly experienced symptoms in a workshop. Most patients had moderate to severe GPP. Patients in both the interviews and workshop described experiencing pain, redness, itch, burning, and discomfort with their boils. During interviews, the patients said the PSS questionnaire was easy to understand. Patients in the workshop also found the PSS to be relevant and easy to understand. Patients agreed the symptoms in the PSS, pain, redness, itch, and burning, were common and important. Study results support the PSS for use with patients in clinical trials.

Time to Loss of Response following Withdrawal of Ixekizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

In clinical practice, interruption of treatment may not result in immediate cessation of disease control, and some patients even experience sustained treatment response following treatment interruption. This post hoc analysis of UNCOVER-1 and -2 Phase 3 clinical trials characterized the time to loss of treatment response in patients with psoriasis who responded to ixekizumab through a 12-week treatment period, and who were then re-randomized to placebo for the following 48 weeks. For those with static Physician Global Assessment [sPGA]0/1 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]90 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI90 was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 12.7–16.4). For those with PASI100 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI100 was 12.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 9.0–13.0). A small subset of patients maintained high levels of disease control through Week 60. This study adds to the growing body of evidence on sustained treatment response following treatment interruption.

A Practical Guide to the Management of Oral Candidiasis in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis Receiving Treatments That Target Interleukin-17

Plaque psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease associated with the dysregulation of cytokines, especially those involved in the interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 pathways. In recent years, there has been growing interest in developing biologic therapies that target these pathways. However, inhibition of the cytokines of the IL-23/IL-17 pathways may increase patients' risk of developing fungal infections, particularly oral candidiasis. Therefore, it is important that dermatology practitioners can effectively diagnose and treat oral candidiasis. In this review, we examine the role of the IL-23/IL-17 pathways in antifungal host defense, and provide a practical guide to the diagnosis and treatment of oral candidiasis in patients with psoriasis. Overall, while treatment with anti-IL-17 medications leads to an increased incidence of oral candidiasis in patients with psoriasis, these cases are typically mild or moderate in severity and can be managed with standard antifungal therapy without discontinuing treatment for psoriasis. If applicable, patients with psoriasis should also be advised to practice good oral hygiene and manage or control co-existing diabetes, and should be provided with information on smoking cessation to prevent oral candidiasis.

Application of the Statistical Method to Convert Published PASI 50/75/90/100 into Absolute PASI Response Rate in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Tildrakizumab Based on Data from the Two Pivotal Phase 3 Studies reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2

BACKGROUND

Absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a key endpoint in psoriasis management. Petto et al. [Pharm Stat. 2019;18(1):4-21] developed a statistical method to estimate the proportion of patients reaching absolute PASI response given baseline PASI score and proportion of patients achieving relative improvements at predefined time points.

OBJECTIVES

To test this method on clinical data from two phase 3 tildrakizumab trials (reSURFACE 1/2) comparing estimated absolute PASI ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 responses with reference responses from clinical databases.

METHODS

Reference PASI responses of ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 were extracted from clinical databases. Estimation of absolute PASI ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 response rates at week (W) 12 and W28 by treatment and trial were performed. Differences between estimated and reference responses were analysed. Bland-Atman limits of agreement and Passing-Bablok regression to assess variations between estimated and reference responses were performed.

RESULTS

Differences between estimated and reference absolute PASI ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 responses at W12 and W28 by treatment and trial were of little clinical relevance with an overall mean difference in PASI response proportion of -2.2% (e.g., for the tildrakizumab 100-mg arm, original proportions of patients achieving PASI of ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 at W28 were 38.5%/52.2%/63.5%/73.9% and 39.8%/54.8%/63.6%/76.9% [reSURFACE 1 and 2, respectively] vs. estimated proportions of 33.2%/49.8%/62.5%/78.3% and 34.3%/51.6%/64.5%/79.9%). Limits of agreement were -7.1% to 1.4% at W12 and -6.8% to 4.3% at W28. Scatterplots revealed linearity that stood the cusum test in Passing-Bablok regression with slope 1.14 (95% confidence intervals: 1.06 to 1.20).

CONCLUSION

Good estimates of absolute PASI response rates were achieved with the application of the statistical method to tildrakizumab data reported in the phase 3 studies, in particular in the verum study arms. Our data support the method provided by Petto et al. [2019] to estimate proportions of psoriasis patients reaching absolute PASI value thresholds using relative PASI improvements.

Tepilamide Fumarate (PPC-06) Extended Release Tablets in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Safety and Efficacy Results from the Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled AFFIRM Study

OBJECTIVE

Safe, effective, long-term oral therapies are needed for plaque psoriasis. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of tepilamide fumarate (a fumaric acid ester) extended-release tablets.

METHODS

This Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week, multicenter study treated adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with tepilamide fumarate 400 mg once (QD) or twice daily (BID), 600 mg BID, or placebo. Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of clear or almost clear (≥2 points' reduction).

RESULTS

A total of 426 patients were randomized (mean age 49.6 [±13.0] years). There was a ≥75% PASI reduction in 39.7%, 47.2%, 44.3%, and 20.0% in the 400 mg QD, 400 mg BID, 600 mg BID, and placebo groups, respectively; IGA treatment success was 35.7%, 41.4%, 44.4%, and 22.0%, respectively. Between 50%-66% of tepilamide fumarate and 48% of placebo patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event. Gastrointestinal intolerance (20%-42%), infection (6%-18%), and decreased lymphocyte count (4%-9%) were more common with tepilamide fumarate.

LIMITATIONS

High placebo response somewhat limits the utility of these findings.

CONCLUSION

Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with oral tepilamide fumarate demonstrated positive response.

A Structured Intervention for Medical Students Significantly Improves Awareness for Stigmatisation in Visible Chronic Skin Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial

People with visible skin diseases often experience stigmatisation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new intervention for medical students to counter the stigmatisation of people with skin diseases. The intervention was evaluated using a randomised controlled design. Effectiveness was assessed at 3 time points. Data from 127 participants were analysed. Regarding the outcome “social distance”, a significant difference between the measurement points was observed for the intervention group (χ²(2) = 54.32, p < 0.001), which also showed a significant effect on agreement with negative stereotypes (F(1.67, 118.67) = 23.83, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.25). Regarding the outcome “agreement with disease-related misconceptions”, a significant difference between the measurement time points was observed for the intervention group (χ²(2) = 46.33, p < 0.001); similar results were found for the outcome “stigmatising behaviour” (F(1.86, 131.89) = 6.16, p = 0.003, partial η2 = 0.08). The results should encourage medical faculties to invest in such courses in order to prevent stigmatisation of people with skin diseases.

Effective and Safe Treatment of Psoriatic Disease with the Anti-IL-23p19 Biologic Tildrakizumab: Results of a Real-World Prospective Cohort Study in Nonselected Patients

Background

After registration of drugs, evidence about efficacy and safety is solely based on data of phase 2/3 clinical trial programs. A major drawback is the selection of patients following inclusion/exclusion criteria. There is a considerable time and knowledge gap between study and registry data that evaluate real-world evidence (RWE). To close this gap, prospective cohort data are helpful.

Objectives

Soon after tildrakizumab, an interleukin 23p19-inhibitor, was registered for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, a prospective single-center cohort study was established to evaluate efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in daily practice.

Methods

Following approval of tildrakizumab, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic treatment were included into the Kiel Tildra Cohort (KTC) and followed using routine assessments of efficacy, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), dermatology life quality index (DLQI), itch (visual analog scale), and safety. Data of the KTC were compared to the respective phase 3 clinical trials.

Results

The KTC included 150 patients differing substantially from those in the trial program. There was a high rate of previous systemic (87.3%) and biologic (31.8%) therapy and of comorbidity in the KTC as compared to the phase 3 studies. Due to the best practice approach, baseline PASI was lower in the KTC, but DLQI was similar in both groups. At the time of this analysis, 126 patients completed week 28, 92 patients week 52, and 58 patients week 76, respectively. There was a constant improvement in PASI, BSA, DLQI, and itch from baseline until week 76. There was no clinically meaningful laboratory abnormality.

Conclusions

Patients treated in routine practice with tildrakizumab differed substantially from the phase 3 studies. Despite systemic pre-treatment and increased comorbidity, tildrakizumab showed comparable efficacy and safety in the KTC. Prospective cohort studies are a suitable tool to generate RWE before registry data become available.

Absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index as a valuable marker to determine initial treatment response in psoriasis patients treated with guselkumab in routine clinical care

Guselkumab is an anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody approved as a first-line medication in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis and second-line in active psoriatic arthritis. In the clinic, patients who have shown a lack of previous treatment efficacy and/or tolerability are often prescribed guselkumab. These patients generally have less severe psoriasis compared to clinical trial cohorts, reflected in lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). To evaluate treatment response in a real-world setting, we conducted a multicenter-retrospective chart review in three specialized dermatological centers. Seventy-four patients who received guselkumab treatment were included in the study and baseline characteristics were described. The mean PASI at baseline was 13.0 (± 6.7). After 12 weeks of treatment 40 patients could be followed up at the participating centers and efficacy was assessed: 72.5% of these patients achieved an absolute PASI ≤5 (55.0% ≤3; 42.5% ≤2) whereas only 57.5% of patients were able to gain a delta PASI reduction of at least 75%. Using the absolute PASI as a treatment goal rather than response rate revealed that guselkumab was highly effective in this real-world setting. In conclusion, the absolute PASI proved to be a more valuable tool to measure treatment outcome.

Documentation of psoriasis in routine care - expert consensus on a German data set

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Documenting patient data in psoriasis clinical practice can improve care, but standardized and transparent documentation is rare. The current project aimed to develop a data set for the documentation of psoriasis in daily practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In four online Delphi rounds and one in-person meeting, 27 psoriasis experts allocated variables to a standard, an optimal and an optional data set. Most of the questions were standardized. Open questions were included to allow for the provision of reasons and to enlarge the data sets. Furthermore, in the in-person meeting we considered a) patients' attitudes and b) dermatologists' information on the current usage and acceptability in Germany.

RESULTS

The consensus approach resulted in a data set with 69 variables. The standard data set includes 20, the optimal data set 31 and the optional data set 18 variables. In summary, the data set can mainly be grouped into master data, general status and medical history data, medical history of psoriasis, status of psoriasis, diagnostics and comorbidity, therapies and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus recommendation of a standard, an optimal and an optional data set for routine care of psoriasis intends to be a decision-making aid and an orientation for both daily practice and further development of documentation systems.

Human erythrocytes, nuclear factor kappaB (NFκB) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) - from non-genomic to genomic research

Enucleated mature human erythrocytes possess NFĸBs and their upstream kinases. There is a negative correlation between eryptosis (cell death of erythrocytes) and the amount of NFĸB subunits p50 and Rel A (p65). This finding is based on the fact that young erythrocytes have the highest levels of NFĸBs and the lowest eryptosis rate, while in old erythrocytes the opposite ratio prevails. Human erythrocytes (hRBCs) effectively control the homeostasis of the cell membrane permeable anti-inflammatory signal molecule hydrogen sulfide (H2S). They endogenously produce H2S via both non-enzymic (glutathione-dependent) and enzymic processes (mercaptopyruvate sulfur transferase-dependent). They uptake H2S from diverse tissues and very effectively degrade H2S via methemoglobin (Hb-Fe3+)-catalyzed oxidation. Interestingly, a reciprocal correlation exists between the intensity of inflammatory diseases and endogenous levels of H2S. H2S deficiency has been observed in patients with diabetes, psoriasis, obesity, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, endogenous H2S deficiency results in impaired renal erythropoietin (EPO) production and EPO-dependent erythropoiesis. In general we can say: dynamic reciprocal interaction between tumor suppressor and oncoproteins, orchestrated and sequential activation of pro-inflammatory NFĸB heterodimers (RelA-p50) and the anti-inflammatory NFĸB-p50 homodimers for optimal inflammation response, appropriate generation, subsequent degradation of H2S etc., are prerequisites for a functioning cell and organism. Diseases arise when the fragile balance between different signaling pathways that keep each other in check is permanently disturbed. This work deals with the intact anti-inflammatory hRBCs and their role as guarantors to maintain the redox status in the physiological range, a basis for general health and well-being.

Effectiveness of a structured short intervention against stigmatisation in chronic visible skin diseases: Results of a controlled trial in future educators

Background

Chronic visible skin diseases are highly prevalent, and patients affected frequently report feeling stigmatised. Interventions to reduce stigmatisation are rare.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured short intervention in reducing stigmatising attitudes towards psoriasis in future educators.

Methods

The intervention consisted of four components: (1) self‐reflection, (2) education on skin diseases, (3) contact between participants and a person with psoriasis and (4) practising of knowledge via case studies. A quasi‐experimental, pre–post study design was chosen with a nonrandomized contemporaneous control group that attended regular lessons. The main outcomes were participants' desire for social distance, stereotype endorsement, illness‐related misconceptions and intended behaviour. Intervention effects were analysed using mixed repeated‐measures analysis of variance, with Bonferroni post‐hoc tests for pairwise comparisons.

Results

The sample consisted of 221 students attending vocational training as educators (n = 118 intervention group, n = 103 control group). While no effect of the intervention was found in social distance, small to large effect sizes were observed for intended behaviour (r = .14), illness‐related misconceptions (r = .28) and stereotype endorsement (r = .42). The intervention group reported significantly higher satisfaction with the seminar compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Overall, the short intervention was effective at reducing stigmatising attitudes in future educators. In perspective, revised versions could help in reducing stigmatisation in various demographics and promote patient empowerment by acknowledging and including them as experts on their own behalf.

Patient or Public Contribution

Patient advocate groups were consulted and involved in the superordinate destigmatization research programme and intervention.

Effect of baseline disease severity on achievement of treatment target with apremilast: results from a pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Treating to absolute treatment targets rather than relative measures such as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-75 is emerging as an important clinical concept included in psoriasis guidelines and clinical practice. Achieving treatment targets is associated with achievement of long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between psoriasis severity, disease characteristics and achievement of PASI ≤2 with apremilast in a pooled analysis of the phase 3 ESTEEM 1 and 2 (NCT01194219 and NCT01232283), phase 3b LIBERATE (NCT01690299) and phase 4 UNVEIL (NCT02425826) clinical trials.

METHODS

Pooled data from patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis randomized to apremilast 30 mg BID were analysed by baseline PASI quartiles (Q1: 2.4-13.1; Q2: 13.2-15.9; Q3: 16.0-20.0; Q4: 20.1-57.8). Assessments included PASI, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Scalp Physician's Global Assessment (ScPGA; ScPGA ≥1) and target (worst) Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI; NAPSI ≥1).

RESULTS

Of 1062 patients, 963 had ScPGA ≥1 and 643 had NAPSI ≥1; 771 patients with baseline and Week 32 PASI assessments were included in analyses of Week 32 PASI target achievement. Rates of PASI ≤2 at Week 32 were greater in lower PASI quartiles (Q1: 43.5%; Q2: 31.2%; Q3: 26.8%; Q4: 18.4%). Most patients achieving PASI ≤2 target (83.6%) achieved DLQI ≤5 at Week 32; 59.3% of patients who did not achieve PASI ≤2 target achieved DLQI ≤5. At Week 32, mean improvements in ScPGA and NAPSI were similar with more moderate vs. more severe disease (ScPGA, range: 1.1-1.4; NAPSI, range: 1.6-2.5). In a subgroup analysis, achievement of PASI ≤2 target was higher in the lowest PASI quartile and with disease duration <5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater achievement of PASI ≤2 was observed in patients with more moderate vs. more severe skin disease. Apremilast may be particularly beneficial in more moderate disease early in the treatment paradigm.