1
|
Sjöberg M, Carlander U, Montes AM, Lidén C, Karlsson HL. Sensitizing substances including isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) in diabetes devices are predicted as skin sensitizers by the non-animal assay KeratinoSens™-Are better preventive approaches possible? Contact Dermatitis 2024; 91:247-249. [PMID: 38725257 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Sjöberg
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Carlander
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Carola Lidén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna L Karlsson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
John SM, Bonertz A, Zimmer J, Aerts O, Bauer A, Bova M, Brans R, Del Giacco S, Dickel H, Corazza M, Crépy MN, Gallo R, Garcia-Abujeta JL, Giménez-Arnau AM, Klimek L, Lepoittevin JP, Ljubojević Hadžavdić S, Matura M, Mortz CG, Özkaya E, Pesonen M, Raison-Peyron N, Rustemeyer T, Skudlik C, Spiewak R, Stingeni L, Suomela S, Symanzik C, Taylor J, Torres M, Uter W, White I, Wilkinson M, Mahler V, Johansen JD. Severely compromised supply of patch test allergens in Europe hampers adequate diagnosis of occupational and non-occupational contact allergy. A European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD), European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) task forces 'Contact Dermatitis' and 'Occupational Skin Disease' position paper. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 91:91-103. [PMID: 38812248 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Patch testing is the only clinically applicable diagnostic method for Type IV allergy. The availability of Type IV patch test (PT) allergens in Europe, however, is currently scarce. This severely compromises adequate diagnostics of contact allergy, leading to serious consequences for the affected patients. Against this background, the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) has created a task force (TF) (i) to explore the current availability of PT substances in different member states, (ii) to highlight some of the unique characteristics of Type IV vs. other allergens and (iii) to suggest ways forward to promote and ensure availability of high-quality patch testing substances for the diagnosis of Type IV allergies throughout Europe. The suggestions of the TF on how to improve the availability of PT allergens are supported by the ESCD, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and intend to provide potential means to resolve the present medical crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swen Malte John
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Andreas Bonertz
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Allergology Division, Langen, Germany
| | - Julia Zimmer
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Allergology Division, Langen, Germany
| | - Olivier Aerts
- University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Allergy Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maria Bova
- Department of Internal Medicine, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Richard Brans
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Stefano Del Giacco
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health and Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital "Duilio Casula", University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Monica Corazza
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marie-Noëlle Crépy
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Diseases, University Hospital of Centre of Paris, Hotel-Dieu Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Rosella Gallo
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Ana Maria Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Mihaly Matura
- Department of Dermatology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Charlotte Gotthard Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Esen Özkaya
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria Pesonen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Occupational Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Nadia Raison-Peyron
- Department of Dermatology, Montpellier University Hospital and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology-Allergology and Occupational Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph Skudlik
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Luca Stingeni
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sari Suomela
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Occupational Medicine, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Cara Symanzik
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) and Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - James Taylor
- Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Maria Torres
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga, UMA, RETICS ARADyAL, BIONAND, Malaga, Spain
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ian White
- Department of Cutaneous Allergy, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Vera Mahler
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Allergology Division, Langen, Germany
| | - Jeanne Duus Johansen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
von Kobyletzki LB, Ulriksdotter J, Sukakul T, Aerts O, Agner T, Buhl T, Bruze M, Foti C, Gimenez-Arnau A, Gonçalo M, Hamnerius N, Johansen JD, Rustemeyer T, Stingeni L, Wilkinson M, Svedman C. Prevalence of dermatitis including allergic contact dermatitis from medical devices used by children and adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and questionnaire study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024; 38:1329-1346. [PMID: 38400603 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Use of medical devices (MDs), that is, glucose sensors and insulin pumps, in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) has proven an enormous advantage for disease control. Adverse skin reactions from these MDs may however hamper compliance. The objective of this study was to systematically review and analyse studies assessing the prevalence and incidence of dermatitis, including allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) related to MDs used in patients with T1D and to compare referral routes and the clinical investigation routines between clinics being part of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group (EECDRG). A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases of full-text studies reporting incidence and prevalence of dermatitis in persons with T1D using MDs was conducted until December 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. The inventory performed at EECRDG clinics focused on referral routes, patient numbers and the diagnostic process. Among the 3145 screened abstracts, 39 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies included data on children only, 14 studies were on adults and nine studies reported data on both children and adults. Participants were exposed to a broad range of devices. Skin reactions were rarely specified. It was found that both the diagnostic process and referral routes differ in different centres. Further data on the prevalence of skin reactions related to MDs in individuals with T1D is needed and particularly studies where the skin reactions are correctly diagnosed. A correct diagnosis is delayed or hampered by the fact that, at present, the actual substances within the MDs are not declared, are changed without notice and the commercially available test materials are not adequately updated. Within Europe, routines for referral should be made more standardized to improve the diagnostic procedure when investigating patients with possible ACD from MDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L B von Kobyletzki
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - J Ulriksdotter
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - T Sukakul
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - O Aerts
- Contact Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and Research Group Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - T Agner
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Buhl
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - M Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - C Foti
- Section of Dermatology, DIMEPREJ Department, University "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - A Gimenez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar and Research Institute de Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Gonçalo
- Clinic of Dermatology, Coimbra University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - N Hamnerius
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J D Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Rustemeyer
- Dermato-Allergology and Occupational Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Stingeni
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M Wilkinson
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - C Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kursawe Larsen C, Schwensen JFB, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Contact allergy to rubber accelerators in consecutively patch tested Danish eczema patients: A retrospective observational study from 1990 to 2019. Contact Dermatitis 2024; 90:116-125. [PMID: 37735996 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rubber accelerators are used in the production of rubber gloves and may cause contact allergy. OBJECTIVES To estimate long-term trend and prevalence of contact allergy to rubber accelerators for a 30-year period in Denmark, high-risk occupations, and exposures. METHODS Data from all patients with contact dermatitis consecutively patch tested at the department of Skin and Allergy Gentofte hospital with the rubber accelerators from the European baseline series (EBS) from 1990 to 2019, were analysed. Further, patients under suspicion of rubber accelerator contact allergy were additionally patch-tested with rubber accelerators from the specialised rubber series from 2005 to 2019 and these were additional extracted. RESULTS The overall prevalence of contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS series was 2.7% with a significant decline in the first 12-years, followed by a stable frequency in the past 18-years. Associations with occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis, and leg/foot dermatitis were found. Wet-work occupations were most often affected and gloves the most frequent exposure. CONCLUSIONS Contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS is frequent and has been unchanged for several decades, which calls for prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoffer Kursawe Larsen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob F B Schwensen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Claus Zachariae
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Jeanne D Johansen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Corazza M, Monti A, Schettini N, Pacetti L, Borghi A. Angioedema-like contact dermatitis due to methylisothiazolinone in a mouthwash. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 89:384-385. [PMID: 37538007 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Corazza
- Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alberto Monti
- Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Natale Schettini
- Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Pacetti
- Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Borghi
- Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Passanisi S, Berg AK, Chobot A, Dos Santos TJ, Piona CA, Messer L, Lombardo F. First International Survey on Diabetes Providers' Assessment of Skin Reactions in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Using Technological Devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231206155. [PMID: 37846755 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231206155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in diabetes technological devices led to optimization of diabetes care; however, long-lasting skin exposure to devices may be accompanied by an increasing occurrence of cutaneous reactions. METHODS We used an open-link web-based survey to evaluate diabetes-care providers' viewpoint on prevalence, management practices, and knowledge related to skin reactions with the use of diabetes technological devices. A post hoc analysis was applied to investigate differences in the level of awareness on this topic in relation to the experience in diabetes technology. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five responses from 39 different countries were collected. Most respondents (69%) routinely examine patients' skin at each visit. All the preventive measures are not clear and, mainly, homogenously put into clinical practice. Contact dermatitis was the most frequently reported cutaneous complication due to diabetes devices, and its most common provocative causes are not yet fully known by diabetes-care providers. Almost half of the respondents (42%) had discussed the presence of harmful allergens contained in adhesives with device manufacturers. There is general agreement on the need to strengthen knowledge on dermatological complications. CONCLUSIONS Although diabetes-care providers are quite aware of the chance to develop skin reactions in people with diabetes using technological devices, there are still some unmet needs. Large follow-up studies and further dissemination tools are awaited to address the gaps revealed by our survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Passanisi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi," University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Anna Korsgaard Berg
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Agata Chobot
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland
| | | | - Claudia Anita Piona
- Pediatric Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Unit, Regional Center for Pediatric Diabetes, University City Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laurel Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Fortunato Lombardo
- Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi," University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berg AK, Grauslund AC, Sørensen F, Thorsen SU, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C, Svensson J. A Skin Care Program to Prevent Skin Problems due to Diabetes Devices in Children and Adolescents: A Cluster-Controlled Intervention Study. Diabetes Care 2023; 46:1770-1777. [PMID: 37478335 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-0462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diabetes devices that deliver insulin and measure blood glucose levels are cornerstones in modern treatment of type 1 diabetes. However, their use is frequently associated with the development of skin problems, particularly eczema and wounds. Proper skin care may prevent skin problems, yet evidence-based information from interventional studies is missing. Providing this information is the aim of this study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This cluster-controlled intervention study tested the efficacy of a basic skin care program (including use of lipid cream, removal, and avoidance of disinfection). A total of 170 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes were included and assigned either to the intervention group (n = 112) or the control group (n = 58). Participants were seen quarterly the first year after device initiation, with clinical assessment and interview in an unblinded setting. RESULTS Eczema or wounds were observed in 33.6% of the intervention group compared with 46.6% of control participants (absolute difference, 12.9% [95% CI -28.7%, 2.9%]; P = 0.10). The adjusted odds of wound development were decreased by 71% in the intervention compared with control group (for wounds, odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.12, 0.68]; P = 0.005). In total, only eight infections were seen, without a higher frequency in the intervention group, despite advice to omit disinfection. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate our basic skin care program partially prevented diabetes device-induced skin reactions. However, more preventive strategies with other adhesives, patches, and/or types of lotions are needed for optimized prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Korsgaard Berg
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Pediatrics, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Fiona Sørensen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Pediatrics, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Steffen Ullitz Thorsen
- Department of Pediatrics, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob P Thyssen
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Zachariae
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Jannet Svensson
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Pediatrics, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Significance: Healthy skin provides a barrier to contaminants. Breaches in skin integrity are often encountered in the patient health care journey, owing to intrinsic health issues or to various procedures and medical devices used. The time has come to move clinical practice beyond mere awareness of medical adhesive-related skin injury and toward improved care and outcomes. Recent Advances: Methods developed in research settings allow quantitative assessments of skin damage based on the measurement of baseline skin properties. These properties become altered by stress and over time. Assessment methods typically used by the cosmetic industry to compare product performance could offer new possibilities to improve clinical practice by providing better information on the status of patient skin. This review summarizes available skin assessment methods as well as specific patient risks for skin damage. Critical Issues: Patients in health care settings may be at risk for skin damage owing to predisposing medical conditions, health status, medications taken, and procedures or devices used in their treatment. Skin injuries come as an additional burden to these medical circumstances and could be prevented. Technology should be leveraged to improve care, help maintain patient skin health, and better characterize functional wound closure. Future Directions: Skin testing methods developed to evaluate cosmetic products or assess damage caused by occupational exposure can provide detailed, quantitative information on the integrity of skin. Such methods have the potential to guide prevention and treatment efforts to improve the care of patients suffering from skin integrity issues while in the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphanie F. Bernatchez
- 3M Health Care, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.,Correspondence: 3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN 55144-1000, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bauer A, Pesonen M, Brans R, Caroppo F, Dickel H, Dugonik A, Larese Filon F, Geier J, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Napolitano M, Patruno C, Rustemeyer T, Simon D, Schuttelaar MLA, Spiewak R, Stingeni L, Vok M, Weisshaar E, Wilkinson M, Valiukeviciene S, Uter W. Occupational contact allergy: The European perspective-Analysis of patch test data from ESSCA between 2011 and 2020. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 88:263-274. [PMID: 36694979 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Occupational skin diseases have led the occupational disease statistics in Europe for many years. Especially occupational allergic contact dermatitis is associated with a poor prognosis and low healing rates leading to an enormous burden for the affected individual and for society. OBJECTIVES To present the sensitization frequencies to the most relevant allergens of the European baseline series in patients with occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) and to compare sensitization profiles of different occupations. METHODS The data of 16 022 patients considered having OCD after patch testing within the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network between January 2011 and December 2020 were evaluated. Patients (n = 46 652) in whom an occupational causation was refuted served as comparison group. RESULTS The highest percentages of OCD were found among patients working in agriculture, fishery and related workers, metal industry, chemical industry, followed by building and construction industry, health care, food and service industry. Sensitizations to rubber chemicals (thiurams, carbamates, benzothiazoles) and epoxy resins were associated with at least a doubled risk of OCD. After a decline from 2014 onwards, the risks to acquire an occupation-related sensitization to methyl(chloro)isothiazolinone (MCI/MI) and especially to methylisothiazolinone (MI) seem to increase again. Sensitization rates to formaldehyde were stable, and to methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) slightly decreasing over time. CONCLUSIONS Among allergens in the European Baseline Series, occupational relevance is most frequently attributed to rubber accelerators, epoxy resins and preservatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maria Pesonen
- Occupational Health Unit, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Richard Brans
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Germany and Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Francesca Caroppo
- Unit of Clinic Dermatology, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Francesca Larese Filon
- Department of Public Health, Occupational Medicine, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Department of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Maddalena Napolitano
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences Vincenzo Tiberio, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Cataldo Patruno
- Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marie L A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Luca Stingeni
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marko Vok
- Dermatovenerološka ambulanta, Izola, Slovenia
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Skaidra Valiukeviciene
- Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shawa H, Wu PA, Dahle S, Isseroff RR, Sood A. Potential Allergens in Wound Care Products. Dermatitis 2023; 34:51-55. [PMID: 36705648 DOI: 10.1089/derm.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic wounds have an increased risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Reports of ACD to wound care products are not uncommon. To minimize contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds, allergenic ingredients should be avoided when possible. Objective: With more than 5000 wound care products available in the United States, it is essential to understand which products can be chosen to minimize allergen exposures. Methods: Ingredients in wound care products in 5 wound care clinics across 2 institutions were cross-referenced with the American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series 2020. Results: Of the 267 wound care products included, 97 (36.3%) contained at least one allergen, including 31 dressings/wraps (22.3%), 25 medications (69.4%), 12 cleaning supplies (36.3%), 16 tapes/glues (80%), 2 instruments (14.3%), 8 emollients and vehicles (61.5%), 1 ostomy product (11.1%), and 2 odor-eliminating products (66.7%). Thirty-four different allergens were identified across all products. The most common allergens present in the included items were acrylates and propylene glycol, followed by parabens, cetyl stearyl alcohol, tocopherol, fragrance, and phenoxyethanol. Conclusions: Many wound care products contain at least one contact allergen, highlighting the importance of clinician education on ACD in the context of wound care product selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harrison Shawa
- From the ∗Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis.,Section of Dermatology
| | - Peggy A Wu
- From the ∗Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis.,Section of Dermatology
| | - Sara Dahle
- From the ∗Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis.,Section of Podiatry, Veterans Affairs Northern California Healthcare System, Sacramento
| | - R Rivkah Isseroff
- From the ∗Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis.,Section of Dermatology
| | - Apra Sood
- From the ∗Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis.,Section of Dermatology
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tauschmann M, Forlenza G, Hood K, Cardona-Hernandez R, Giani E, Hendrieckx C, DeSalvo DJ, Laffel LM, Saboo B, Wheeler BJ, Laptev DN, Yarhere I, DiMeglio LA. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring. Pediatr Diabetes 2022; 23:1390-1405. [PMID: 36537528 PMCID: PMC10107687 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Tauschmann
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregory Forlenza
- Pediatric Diabetes Division, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Korey Hood
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | - Elisa Giani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Christel Hendrieckx
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Australia Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel J DeSalvo
- Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lori M Laffel
- Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Banshi Saboo
- Department of Diabetology, Diabetes Care and Hormone Clinic, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Benjamin J Wheeler
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.,Paediatrics Department, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Iroro Yarhere
- Endocrinology Unit, Paediatrics Department, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | - Linda A DiMeglio
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Elbarbary NS, Simmons K, Buckingham B, Humayun KN, Johannsen J, Holl RW, Betz S, Mahmud FH. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Other complications and associated conditions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2022; 23:1451-1467. [PMID: 36537532 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Kimber Simmons
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Khadija N Humayun
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Jesper Johannsen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Reinhard W Holl
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Shana Betz
- Parent/Advocate for people with diabetes, Markham, Canada
| | - Farid H Mahmud
- Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shawa H, Wu PA, Dahle S, Isseroff RR, Sood A. Potential Allergens in Wound Care Products. Dermatitis 2022; Publish Ahead of Print:01206501-990000000-00064. [PMID: 36136000 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic wounds have an increased risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Reports of ACD to wound care products are not uncommon. To minimize contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds, allergenic ingredients should be avoided when possible. OBJECTIVE With more than 5000 wound care products available in the United States, it is essential to understand which products can be chosen to minimize allergen exposures. METHODS Ingredients in wound care products in 5 wound care clinics across 2 institutions were cross-referenced with the American Contact Dermatitis Society core allergen series 2020. RESULTS Of the 267 wound care products included, 97 (36.3%) contained at least one allergen, including 31 dressings/wraps (22.3%), 25 medications (69.4%), 12 cleaning supplies (36.3%), 16 tapes/glues (80%), 2 instruments (14.3%), 8 emollients and vehicles (61.5%), 1 ostomy product (11.1%), and 2 odor-eliminating products (66.7%). Thirty-four different allergens were identified across all products. The most common allergens present in the included items were acrylates and propylene glycol, followed by parabens, cetyl stearyl alcohol, tocopherol, fragrance, and phenoxyethanol. CONCLUSIONS Many wound care products contain at least one contact allergen, highlighting the importance of clinician education on ACD in the context of wound care product selection.
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel K, Flanders B, Kolawole H, Nixon R. Allergic contact dermatitis to an epidural catheter but what's the allergen?: A case report. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 87:462-464. [PMID: 35908209 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
15
|
Johansen JD, Bonefeld CM, Schwensen JFB, Thyssen JP, Uter W. Novel insights into contact dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149:1162-1171. [PMID: 35183605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Contact dermatitis is a common disease, caused by repeated skin contact to contact allergens or irritants, resulting in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and/or irritant contact dermatitis. Attempts have been made to identify biomarkers to distinguish irritant and allergic patch test reactions, which could aid diagnosis. Some promising candidates have recently been identified, but verification and validation in clinical cases still need to be done. New causes of ACD are constantly recognized. In this review, 10 new contact allergens from recent years, were identified, several relating to anti-age products. Frequent allergens causing considerable morbidity in the population such as the preservative methylisothiazolinone (MI) have been regulated in EU. A significant drop in cases has been seen, while high rates are still occurring in other areas such as North America. Other frequent causes are fragrance allergens especially widely used terpenes and acrylates used in medical devises for control of diabetes. These represent unsolved problems. Recent advances in immunology have opened for a better understanding of the complexity of contact dermatitis, especially ACD. The disease may be more heterogenous that previous understood with several subtypes. With the rapidly evolving molecular understanding of the disease, the potential for development of new drugs for personalized treatment of contact dermatitis is considerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Johansen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy. Gentofte Hospital University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
| | - C M Bonefeld
- The LEO Foundation Skin Immunology Research Center, Department of Immunology & Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - J F B Schwensen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy. Gentofte Hospital University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - J P Thyssen
- National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Skin and Allergy. Gentofte Hospital University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - W Uter
- Dept. of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Univ. Erlangen / Nürnberg; Waldstr. 6 91054 Erlangen, GERMANY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Uter W, Wilkinson SM, Aerts O, Bauer A, Borrego L, Buhl T, Cooper SM, Dickel H, Gallo R, Giménez-Arnau AM, John SM, Navarini AA, Pesonen M, Pónyai G, Rustemeyer T, Schliemann S, Schubert S, Schuttelaar MLA, Valiukevičienė S, Wagner N, Weisshaar E, Gonçalo M. European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European Baseline Series, 2019/20 - Joint results of the ESSCA A and the EBS B working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC C. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 86:379-389. [PMID: 35099073 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2019, a number of allergens (haptens), henceforth, 'the audit allergens,' were considered as potential additions to the European baseline series (EBS), namely, sodium metabisulfite, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, Compositae mix II (2.5 or 5% pet), linalool hydroperoxides (lin-OOH), limonene hydroperoxides (lim-OOH), benzisothiazolinone (BIT), octylisothiazolinone (OIT), decyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside; Evernia furfuracea (tree moss), was additionally tested by some departments, too. OBJECTIVES To collect further data on patch test reactivity and clinical relevance of the audit allergens in consecutive patients across Europe. METHODS Patch test data covering the audit allergens in 2019 and 2020 were collected by those departments of the ESSCA testing these, as well as further collaborators from the EBS working group of the ESCD, and the Spanish GEIDAC. As patch test outcome, reactions between day (D) 3 and D5 were considered. RESULTS Altogether n=12403 patients were tested with any of the audit allergen. Positive reactions were most common to lin-OOH 1% pet. (8.74 (8.14-9.37)), followed by lin-OOH 0.5% pet., and lim-OOH 0.3% pet (5.41 (4.95-5.89)). Beyond these terpene hydroperoxides, BIT 0.1% pet. was the second most common allergen with 4.72 (4.2-5.28), followed by sodium metabisulfite 1% pet. (3.75 (3.32-4.23)) and Compositae mix 5% pet. (2.31 (1.84-2.87). For some allergens, clinical relevance was frequently difficult to ascertain. CONCLUSIONS Despite many positive patch test reactions, it remains controversial whether lin- and lim-OOH should be tested routinely, while at least the two preservatives BIT and sodium metabisulfite appear suitable. The present results are a basis for further discussion among the ESCD members and ultimately decision on their implementation into routine testing. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Mark Wilkinson
- Dermatology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Olivier Aerts
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Antwerp (UZA) and Research group Immunology, Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Allergy Centre, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Leopoldo Borrego
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil. Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Timo Buhl
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Susan M Cooper
- Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Rosella Gallo
- Clinica Dermatologica, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ana M Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Swen M John
- Department of Dermatology and Environmental Medicine, Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.,Lower Saxony Institute for Occupational Dermatology (NIB), Osnabrück, Germany
| | | | - Maria Pesonen
- Occupational Health Unit, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Györgyi Pónyai
- Semmelweis University, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Dermatooncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology-Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Steffen Schubert
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology, Institute at the University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Skaidra Valiukevičienė
- Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Nicola Wagner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Erlangen, University of Erlangen-, Nuremberg, (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Malvehy J, Ginsberg R, Sampietro-Colom L, Ficapal J, Combalia M, Svedenhag P. New regulation of medical devices in the EU: impact in dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 36:360-364. [PMID: 34816498 PMCID: PMC9299790 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Medical device (MD) is a broad term that encompasses products ranging from, for example, examination gloves to digital dermoscopy systems; all of which are regulated by a new regulatory framework in the EU from May 2021. The new Medical Device Regulation (MDR) (Regulation EU 2017/745) will have a significant effect on suppliers of MD and will have subsequent effects also for dermatologists and other clinicians. Medical device software and apps are reclassified leading to more stringent requirements on documentation within, e.g. clinical evidence, as well as regulatory authority control. The changes will likely have positive effects on quality, to the benefit of patients. There will, however, be implications affecting the availability and support of existing devices and the introduction of new devices, as well as a likely price increase due to the higher costs for suppliers. Dermatologists, other clinicians and administrators need to be aware of the effects of MDR to ensure that existing devices and new purchases can be used as planned. Specifically, clinicians need to be aware of the following: (i) improved quality of MD and follow‐up of incidents can be expected. (ii) Only ‘non‐significant’ updates will be permitted after May 2021 to many existing systems and devices unless approved under the new MDR. (iii) Existing devices that do not achieve approval under the new regulation will no longer be manufactured after May 2024. (iv) New products and methods will take longer time to be approved and available. (v) Prices will likely increase. (vi) Suppliers of products that do not fulfil the new regulation will disappear, and the availability of consumables, spare parts or upgrades might be discontinued. (vii) A trend to oligopoly may appear in the market. It is therefore important to check with your suppliers as to how and when they will adhere to the new MDR regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Malvehy
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - L Sampietro-Colom
- Research & Innovation Directorate, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Ficapal
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Combalia
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schwensen JF, Simonsen AB, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Facial dermatoses in healthcare professionals induced by the use of protective masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85:710-711. [PMID: 34296441 PMCID: PMC8444920 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Fb Schwensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Copenhagen - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Anne Birgitte Simonsen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Copenhagen - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Claus Zachariae
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Copenhagen - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanne D Johansen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Copenhagen - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lidén C, White IR. Comment on MDBGN/DBDCB, the European baseline series, and EU legislation. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85:607-610. [PMID: 34250623 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carola Lidén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ian R White
- Cutaneous Allergy Team, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|