Quality of life measurement in alopecia areata. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes

Exploring a Patient-Centered Methodology to Identify Suitable Proxy Conditions as a Source for Utility Data, Using Alopecia Areata as a Case Example

OBJECTIVES

In the absence of EQ-5D utility data, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends sourcing utility values from a proxy health condition, provided that data indicate that the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of the conditions is similar. Given that there is no standard practice for identifying proxy conditions, this study presents a patient-centered approach for selecting a proxy condition, using alopecia areata (AA) as an example.

METHODS

A structured electronic search was conducted to identify conceptual models for conditions similar to AA with overlapping HRQoL domains. Conceptual models were compared to determine the most suitable proxy condition, defined as the condition with the most overlapping domains and reported similarities between patient HRQoL. A search and comparison of utility data between AA and the selected proxy condition was conducted to validate their comparability in HRQoL impact.

RESULTS

Seven conditions with overlapping HRQoL domains with AA were identified using conceptual models. Atopic dermatitis (AD) had the most overlapping domains (n = 6) and the greatest evidence of similarities between patient HRQoL; thus, it was selected as the proxy condition. Conceptual models indicated that both conditions affected patients' physical, emotional, and functional well-being. Furthermore, AD and AA utilities were comparable, supporting the choice of AD as the proxy condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the correlation observed between AA and the selected proxy condition using this methodology, this study presents a potential approach to identify proxy conditions for diseases that may be underrepresented in terms of HRQoL data.

Responsiveness of the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Colombian Validated Version of the Skindex-29 in Scarring and Non-Scarring Alopecia

Introduction

Alopecia is a frequent reason for consultation and is often associated with psychological, self-esteem, and quality of life (QoL) impact, particularly in women. To date, QoL assessment studies including all alopecia types are lacking. This study evaluated QoL and sensitivity to change of the Skindex-29 and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in these.

Methods

This was an observational study with a longitudinal design, including two measurements over time and prospective data. It was carried out in four outpatient centers in Medellín, between 2023 and 2024. We included sociodemographic and clinical data, as well as the DLQI and Skindex-29 QoL questionnaires before and after treatment.

Results

Participation of women was 51%; the most frequent types of alopecia were androgenic alopecia (52%), alopecia areata (AA) (19%), and telogen effluvium (TE) (9%). The alopecia types with the greatest impact on QoL (pretreatment) measured through the DLQI and the Skindex-29, respectively, were TE (10.29 [±9.32] and 40.39 [±32.04]), AA (9.27 [±9.13], and 33.91 [±26.47]), dissecting cellulitis (8.67 [±8.33] and 29.6 [±15.33]), and lichen planus pilaris (6.75 [±6.55] and 6.75 [±6.55]).

Conclusion

The version validated in Colombia of the Skindex-29 and the Colombian Spanish version of the DLQI showed a moderate responsiveness when evaluating the QoL of patients with scarring and non-scarring alopecia, before and after starting specific treatment.

Quality-of-Life Measurement in Epidermolysis Bullosa. Position Statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and External Experts

In this paper, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes presents its position statements on health-related (HR) QoL assessment in epidermolysis bullosa (EB). The EADV TF on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes recommends the use of the EB-specific instrument QOLEB in patients over the age of 10 years and, in addition to the QOLEB, the use of iscorEB-p in moderate-to-severe EB; the IntoDermQoL proxy instrument with its EB-specific module should be used in children aged under 5 years. The EB-specific instrument iscorEB-p, and the dermatology-specific instrument CDLQI may measure HRQoL in children with EB aged from 5 to 10 years. Dermatology-specific and/or generic HRQoL instruments should be used to compare the impact on QoL of EB with other diseases; family QoL of patients with EB should be studied using the EB-specific EB-BoD, dermatology-specific family measures, and/or generic family QoL instruments.

Quality of life measurement in assessing treatment effectiveness in urticaria: European experts position statement

In this study, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Urticaria and Angioedema has examined the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measurement in the treatment of urticaria. The Dermatology Life Quality Index was the most frequently used HRQoL instrument in clinical trials on urticaria. Many reports of clinical trials of urticaria gave no exact numeric results related to HRQoL changes, making clear conclusions and comparisons with other studies impossible. The interpretation of HRQoL impairment data is more difficult when assessed by instruments without severity stratification systems. The minimal clinically significant difference (MCID) is a more clinically oriented and relevant parameter than depending on statistically significant changes in HRQoL scores. Therefore, using HRQoL instruments with established MCID data in clinical trials and clinical practice is preferred.

Identification and characterization of alopecia areata subgroups regarding quality of life impairment based on demographic, clinical, psychological, and social factors

The benign dermatological hair condition Alopecia Areata (AA) is known to impair Quality of Life (QoL), especially mental and social health, due to the accompanying visible appearance changes. Previous studies have identified demographic, clinical, social, and psychological variables related to QoL. Yet, the novelty of this study lies in examining how QoL differences in AA relate to (combinations of) these variables. The aim of the current study is to identify and characterize subgroups of AA persons with less or more QoL impairment by means of (combinations of) demographic, clinical, psychological, and social factors, including both potential risk (perceived stigmatization, avoidant coping, physical identity definition) and protective factors (disclosure, social support, emotion-focused coping and non-physical identity definition). An online questionnaire was filled out by 322 persons with AA, including the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) as QoL measure, Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire (FSQ), brief COPE, Social Support Survey, a newly developed identity-definition measure, clinical characteristics, and demographics. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis identified subgroups based on QoL outcome. Lowest QoL impairment was found in persons with low feelings of being flawed combined with low secretiveness. Low QoL impairment was also found in persons feeling flawed combined with low avoidant coping, low sensitivity to others' opinions and older age. QoL impairment was intermediate in persons perceiving more social support in those with a younger age, and defining identity less on physical appearance in those sensitive to others' opinions. Highest QoL impairment was characterized by feeling flawed combined with an avoidant coping style. Current findings provide indications for the identification of risk and protective profiles for QoL impairment and which factors to address in interventions to improve QoL in AA.

Quality of life measurement in urticaria: Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Urticaria and Angioedema

The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces on quality of life (QoL) and patient-oriented outcomes and on urticaria and angioedema recommendations for the assessment of Health-related (HR) QoL in all patients with urticaria in research and practice are as follows: to use the DLQI for adults and the CDLQI for children as dermatology-specific and the CU-Q2oL as a disease-specific HRQoL instruments in urticaria; to use generic instruments to provide comparison of data on urticaria with non-dermatologic diseases, or to compare with healthy volunteers or the general population; to select validated HRQoL instruments with appropriate age limits; to present exact numeric data for HRQoL results; correct title of any HRQoL instrument should be used, along with its correct abbreviation and the reference to its original publication, where possible. The EADV TFs discourage the use of non-validated HRQoL instruments and modified HRQoL instruments that have not undergone standard validation.

Assessing a measure for Quality of Life in patients with severe Alopecia Areata: a multicentric Italian study

Objective

The prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients diagnosed with Alopecia Areata (AA) is very high and this significant burden of psychological symptoms threatens the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of affected patients. Indeed, AA often does not produce significant physical symptoms, but it nonetheless disrupts many areas of mental health. Clinical assessment of disease severity may not reliably predict patient's HRQoL, nor may it predict the patient's perception of illness. For this reason, considerable effort has been made to apply and develop measures that consider patient's perception and assess the HRQoL of individuals affected by AA. The aim of this multicentric study was to provide the Italian version of the Skindex-16AA and to evaluate its psychometric properties in a clinical sample of consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe AA.

Methods

This is a longitudinal, multicenter, observational study. Patients returned for follow-up visits at 4-, 12-, and 24-weeks. The analyses of the current work aimed to confirm the factorial structure of the Skindex-16AA. In the case of non-fit, an alternative structure for the model was proposed, using an Exploratory Graph Analysis and the Bayesian approach.

Results

The sample was composed of 106 patients with AA. Alopecia Universalis was the most frequently diagnosed type of alopecia at all time points. The analyses on the Skindex-16AA revealed that a two-factor structure with eight items fit the data best (Bayesian Posterior Predictive Checking using 95% Confidence Interval for the Difference Between the Observed and the Replicated Chi-Square values = -6.246/56.395, Posterior Predictive P-value = 0.06), and reported satisfactory psychometric properties (i.e., internal consistency and convergent validity).

Conclusion

The Skindex-8AA demonstrated optimal psychometric properties (i.e., convergent and construct validity, and test-retest reliability) measured in a sample of patients with AA, that may suggest that it is an appropriate tool to measure the HRQoL in AA patients. However, further studies are needed in order to confirm and tested other psychometric features of this tool.

Estimation of health utility values for alopecia areata

PURPOSE

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune-mediated inflammatory dermatological disease characterised by non-scarring hair loss affecting the scalp and sometimes other hair-bearing sites. This study aimed to elicit health state utility values (HSUVs) from the UK general population for AA using time trade off (TTO) interviews.

METHODS

Vignette descriptions of health states defined by the extent of hair loss were developed (as well as one describing caregiver burden). These were developed using data from standardised patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, a literature review and qualitative interviews. Health states were defined based on the severity of alopecia tool (SALT), which assesses extensiveness of scalp hair loss. HSUVs were then elicited for each health state in TTO interviews with the UK public.

RESULTS

One caregiver and five patient health states were developed based on the literature review findings, clinical trial PRO (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes Questionnaire) data and qualitative interviews with patients (N = 11), clinical experts (N = 4) and caregivers of adolescents with AA (N = 10). These data showed a more severe impact among patients with more extensive hair loss. One hundred and twenty participants evaluated the vignettes in TTO interviews. Patient HSUVs ranged from 0.502 for the most extensive hair loss health state (SALT 50-100 + eyebrow and eyelash loss) to 0.919 (SALT 0-10) for the mildest health state. The caregiver HSUV was 0.882.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative and qualitative data sources were used to develop and validate vignettes describing different AA health states. Patient and caregiver HSUVs demonstrate a large impact associated with AA, especially for states defined by more extensive hair loss.

Bullying in persons with skin diseases

BACKGROUND

There are few studies on bullying in skin diseases. Persons with skin diseases are especially prone to bullying.

OBJECTIVES

This component of the project 'Bullying among Dermatologic Patients' aimed to study the prevalence and nature of bullying in patients with skin diseases from different countries and age groups.

METHODS

Data were collected from participants of international social media groups for patients with skin diseases, in-patients and out-patients with skin diseases, and parents of children with skin diseases from six European countries. School and university students from Poland and Ukraine were asked to answer the question: Have you been bullied because of skin problems?

RESULTS

Bullying was reported in 1016 patients with 36 different skin diseases. Prevalence of self-reported and parental-reported bullying was quite heterogeneous among different countries In total, self-reported bullying was noted by 25.6% of patients with skin diseases during face-to-face consultations, by 63.7% of respondents from international patients' groups and by 12.2% of school and university students. Parental-reported bullying was detected in 34.5% of 3-4 years old children with skin diseases. The peak of bullying prevalence occurred between the ages of 13 and 15. The most prevalent forms of bullying were verbal abuse and social isolation. Physical abuse was the least often reported form of bullying. Only 33.2% of participants talked to anyone about being bullied. Negative long-term effects of bullying were reported by 63% of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin disease-related bullying was reported by patients in all centres of the project. The main manifestations of bullying were similar in different countries and among patients with different skin diseases. International activities aimed to decrease or prevent skin disease-related bullying in different age groups are needed. These activities should be multidirectional and target teachers, parents of classmates and classmates of children with skin diseases, patients' parents and patients themselves.

Epidemiology of alopecia areata and population-wide comorbidities in Germany: analysis of longitudinal claims data

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by acute-onset hair loss. The hair loss can range from small, circumscribed hairless areas on the scalp to complete loss of hair on the head and body hair. However, data on the epidemiology of AA are limited. Current evaluations are lacking in Germany. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and comorbidity of AA in Germany based on claims data.

METHODS

A representative 40% sample of all adults who were insured with a German statutory health insurance company (DAK-Gesundheit) between 2016 and 2020 was evaluated (n = 2.88 million). Based on at least one relevant outpatient or inpatient diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 L63, the annual AA prevalence and incidence (ICD-10 L63) were calculated for 2016 to 2020. Different case definitions were used for diagnosis validation. In addition, the occurrence of comorbidities in patients with AA was investigated.

RESULTS

In 2020, AA prevalence was 210 cases per 100 000 and incidence 72 cases per 100 000. Compared with persons without AA, those with AA significantly more often had atopic dermatitis [rate ratio (RR) 2.9], pruritus (RR 2.7), lupus erythematosus (RR 2.4), urticaria (RR 2.3) and psoriasis (RR 2.2). Women were affected slightly more often than men (0.2% vs. 0.1%). On a regional level, higher prevalence and incidence rates were found in Brandenburg (prevalence 332 cases per 100 000; incidence 116 cases per 100 000), Hesse (prevalence 344 cases per 100 000; incidence 124 cases per 100 000) and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (prevalence 303 cases per 100 000; incidence 111 per 100 000).

CONCLUSIONS

AA is a common immune-mediated skin condition with marked regional variations in Germany. For a complete understanding of epidemiology, complementary population-based studies including clinical characteristics of AA are useful.

Quality of life measurement in teledermatology. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Teledermatology

Many events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, have accelerated the implementation of teledermatology pathways within dermatology departments and across healthcare organizations. Quality of Life (QoL) assessment in dermatology is also a rapidly developing field with a gradual shift from theory to practice. The purpose of this paper organized jointly by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force (TF) on QoL and patient-oriented outcomes and the EADV TF on teledermatology is to present current knowledge about QoL assessment during the use of teledermatology approaches, including data on health-related (HR) QoL instruments used in teledermatology, comparison of influence of different treatment methods on HRQoL after face-to-face and teledermatology consultations and to make practical recommendations concerning the assessment of QoL in teledermatology. The EADV TFs made the following position statements: HRQoL assessment may be an important part in most of teledermatology activities; HRQoL assessment may be easily and effectively performed during teledermatology consultations. It is especially important to monitor HRQoL of patients with chronic skin diseases during lockdowns or in areas where it is difficult to reach a hospital for face-to-face consultation; regular assessment of HRQoL of patients with skin diseases during teledermatology consultations may help to monitor therapy efficacy and visualize individual patient's needs; we recommend the use of the DLQI in teledermatology, including the use of the DLQI app which is available in seven languages; it is important to develop apps for dermatology-specific HRQoL instruments for use in children (for example the CDLQI and InToDermQoL) and for disease-specific instruments.

Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare ultimately aims to eradicate diseases and restore normality to people's lives. However, until this is achieved for every person, there is a need to support and assist patients with psoriasis using non-pharmacological interventions. These 'adjuvant' approaches have received little attention, whereas dermatologists and researchers strive for better pharmacological therapy. Here, we aimed to perform a scoping review to identify and catalogue non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

SETTING

All healthcare settings.

SEARCH STRATEGY

EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus databases were searched from their inception to June 2022. Irrespective of the study type, the studies included non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis. This theme was extracted from the included articles. Two reviewers independently screened and analysed the data.

RESULTS

From 1322 initial records, 71 studies were identified and analysed. Non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis include two levels: organisational and individual. The organisational non-pharmacological interventions included the nationwide healthcare model (PsPSP, ProvenCare, German PsoHealth and Psoriasis Network, IMPROVE model and PsoWell clinic), innovative teledermatology models (mHealth app, electronic Targeted Intervention for Psoriasis study and therapist-guided internet-based cognitive and behavioural treatments) and multidisciplinary interventions. The individual non-pharmacological interventions included educational interventions (therapeutic patient education, psychoeducational intervention and self-management education), psychosocial interventions (cognitive and behavioural treatments, self-help and peer-to-peer support programmes) and others (happify and motivational interviewing-based training).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on previous literature, a nationwide healthcare model protocol was constructed for patients with psoriasis. This provided the direction for developing a new psoriasis healthcare model and a basis for summarising the non-pharmacological interventions for patients with psoriasis, which helps them adjust to changes in the skin disease.

Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The Infants and Toddlers Dermatology Quality of Life (InToDermQoL) is the dermatology-specific proxy health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument for children from birth to 4 years. The aim of the present study was to confirm the responsiveness and establish minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the InToDermQoL.

METHODS

Parents of children with skin diseases were asked to fill in the InToDermQoL at the initial visit (T1) and subsequent consultation (T2). We hypothesized that correlations between change scores of the InToDermQoL and change scores of global assessment of clinical severity by dermatologists and by patients' parents should be above 0.3. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves method was also used for confirmation of responsiveness and determination of MCIDs of the InToDermQoL. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used as an indicator of responsiveness.

RESULTS

Results of 442 patients were included. Correlations between change scores of age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL and change scores of global assessment of clinical severity by dermatologists and by patients' parents were above 0.3 (0.46-0.74). AUCs for age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL were acceptable (above 0.7) or excellent (above 0.8). Estimated MCIDs for the InToDermQoL were as follows: 3 points of total score change for 0-11 months, 5 for 1-2 years and 3 or 4 for 3-4 years version. Estimated MCIDs for the InToDermQoL version for 1-2-year-old children was higher than MCIDs for the 3-4-year-old version despite the higher number of items in the latter. Therefore a MCID of 5 was recommended for both these versions.

CONCLUSIONS

Responsiveness for all age-specific versions of the InToDermQoL questionnaire was confirmed. MCIDs for the InToDermQoL are proposed as follows: 3-point change of the total score for age version 0-11 months and 5-point for the age versions 1-2 years and 3-4 years.

Beyond health-related quality of life: initial psychometric validation of a new scale for addressing the gap in assessing the full range of alopecia areata psychosocial burden

BACKGROUND

Patients with alopecia areata (AA) report a broad range of psychosocial outcomes beyond those assessed in existing health-related quality of life measures. Yet, to date, no psychometrically validated scale based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) appears to exist to comprehensively measure these AA-specific psychosocial outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop such a scale, the Scale of Alopecia Areata Distress (SAAD), and to provide its initial validation evidence.

METHODS

Using existing qualitative research on PROs for patients with AA, a pool of 144 items was generated and subsequently reviewed for relevance, redundancy, clarity and comprehensiveness by subject matter experts in AA psychosocial impacts and the research team. This review resulted in a reduced pool of 122 items, which was then administered to adult patients with AA residing in the USA. Exploratory Factor Analysis using Principal Axis Factoring extraction with oblique rotation identified the SAAD's underlying factor structure. To reduce the SAAD item length, additional item-reduction strategies were used.

RESULTS

There were 392 participants who responded to the 122 items, each with four or fewer missing item responses. Three iterations of the data analysis plan resulted in a 41-item SAAD with seven underlying factors of psychosocial impact: Emotional and Cognitive Functioning, Romantic Relationships, Family Relationships, Primary Life Responsibilities, Non-Primary Life Responsibility Activities, Stigma, and Self-Perception Change. Each factor demonstrated acceptable to high levels of internal consistency reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial validation evidence of the SAAD-41 scale supports its potential as a comprehensive measure of AA-related psychosocial distress for US-based adults. Further scale validation is needed.

The Hairdex quality of life instrument-A translation and psychometric validation in patients with alopecia areata

Background

The German Hairdex quality of life (QoL) instrument is specific to hair and scalp diseases, developed for self-rating and consists of 48 statements divided into five domains: Symptoms, Functioning, Emotions, Self-confidence and Stigmatisation. There was a need of a Swedish reliability tested, validated hair and scalp specific QoL instrument why the German Hairdex was chosen to be translated and reliability tested in a systematic way.

Objectives

To make a translation, a reliability test of stability, and validation of the German Hairdex QoL instrument among 100 Swedish patients with a dermatological ICD-10 diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA).

Methods

An eight-step method by Gudmundsson was used as a model with a forward and backward translation and with comments from an expert panel. A statistical test-retest (ICC (2,1)) analysis was made, followed by an internal consistency analysis. A comparison between the German and Swedish Hairdex-S constructs by a principal component analysis was performed.

Results

The Hairdex-S was very well accepted by patients. The ICC(2,1) test-retest showed a good to excellent correlation of 0.91 (CI [0.85-0.95]). Internal consistency was α = 0.92. Like the original Hairdex, Hairdex-S showed good factorability with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of 0.82 and with one component explaining 70% of the variance: original Hairdex instrument (69%). When tested on patients with AA, the domains Functioning and Emotions had the strongest loadings, followed by Stigmatisation and Self-confidence. Younger AA patients at self-assessment and patients who reported to be younger at the onset of AA, scored statistically significantly higher on the Hairdex-S, indicating an overall lower QoL on domains Emotions and Functioning, respectively.

Conclusions

The Hairdex-S is very well accepted by AA patients, shows very good psychometric properties, and a very good agreement with the original Hairdex. The Swedish Hairdex instrument can be recommended for evaluation of patients QoL as well as for research purposes.

Quality of life measurement in rosacea. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces (TFs) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (ARHS) do not recommend the use of any generic instrument as a single method of Health Related (HR) QoL assessment in rosacea, except when comparing quimp (quality of life impairment) in rosacea patients with that in other non-dermatologic skin diseases and/or healthy controls. The EADV TFs on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and ARHS recommend the use of the dermatology-specific HRQoL instrument the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the rosacea-specific HRQoL instrument RosaQoL in rosacea patients. The DLQI minimal clinically important difference may be used as a marker of clinical efficacy of the treatment and DLQI score banding of 0 or 1 corresponding to no effect on patients' HRQoL could be an important treatment goal. This information may be added to consensuses and guidelines for rosacea.

Quality of life measurement in vitiligo. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes with external experts

Members of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient Oriented Outcomes reviewed the instruments available for health-related (HR) QoL assessment in vitiligo and together with external vitiligo experts (including representatives of the EADV Vitiligo Task Force) have made practical recommendations concerning the assessment of QoL in vitiligo patients. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was the most frequently used HRQoL instrument, making comparison of results between different countries possible. Several vitiligo-specific instruments were identified. The vitiligo Impact Scale (VIS) is an extensively validated vitiligo-specific HRQoL instrument with proposed minimal important change and clinical interpretation for VIS-22 scores. VIS-22 was developed for use in India, where there are some specific cultural beliefs concerning vitiligo. The EADV Task Force on QoL and Patient Oriented Outcomes recommends use of the DLQI and the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) as dermatology-specific instruments in vitiligo. There is a strong need for a valid (including cross-cultural validation) vitiligo-specific instrument that can be either a new instrument or the improvement of existing instruments. This validation must include the proof of responsiveness.

Health-related quality of life in patients with alopecia areata: Results of a Japanese survey with norm-based comparisons

Alopecia areata (AA) is a non-scarring hair loss disorder affecting approximately 2% of the global population. AA is reported to have a significant negative impact on the emotional and psychological well-being of the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Japanese patients with AA in comparison to the Japanese population norms (national standard values for Japanese) using Short Form Health Survey 36 Item Version 2.0 (SF-36v2). The study also aimed to access the negative effect of AA on patients' daily lives and the proportion of patients having anxiety and/or depression. This cross-sectional, non-interventional web-based survey study included 400 participants aged 17-84 years currently suffering from medically diagnosed AA. The assessment tools integrated in the online questionnaire included SF-36v2, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). All outcome measures from the tools were evaluated across the study population. SF-36v2 subscale scores for patients with AA revealed lower scores specifically for mental health (45.7 ± 10.1 points), social functioning (45.8 ± 10.9 points), vitality (46.2 ± 9.8 points), and role emotional (46.9 ± 11.6 points) as compared to the Japanese population norms of 50 ± 10 points each. The DLQI questionnaire-based analysis indicated that 32.1% of respondents showed a moderate to extremely large effect on their lives; and HADS-A (anxiety) and HADS-D (depression) scores categorized 46.0% and 41.8% respondents as doubtful-to-definite cases, respectively. Multivariate linear regression revealed that hair loss range, age, comorbidities, and depression significantly worsened DLQI scores. In conclusion, the results of this survey demonstrated that a significant decrease in the HRQoL scores was observed in Japanese patients with AA in comparison with the national norms. Hence, emphasis on mental health is crucial for AA management.

Validation of the Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) Questionnaire in Adults and Adolescents with Alopecia Areata

Introduction

Individuals with alopecia areata (AA) may experience significant impacts on their health-related quality of life. The novel Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) questionnaire has been developed to assess hair loss signs, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations associated with AA. The objective of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties and establish scoring of the AAPPO in adults and adolescents with AA.

Methods

Scoring and measurement properties of the AAPPO were examined using baseline and 2-week follow-up data from a prospective, noninterventional, web-based study of 121 patients with AA (85 adults aged ≥ 18 years, 36 adolescents aged 12–17 years) with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) ≥ 25% scalp hair loss.

Results

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported four single Hair Loss (HL) items, an Emotional Symptoms domain (ES; 4 items), and an Activity Limitations domain (AL; 3 items). Among all patients, the multi-item ES and AL domains had strong internal consistency (α ≥ 0.87); all HL items and domain scores had strong test-retest reliability (weighted kappa or intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.78). All HL item scores demonstrated strong construct validity (r ≥ 0.52) compared with the patient-reported Alopecia Areata Symptom and Impact Scale (AASIS) hair loss subscale score; ES and AL domain scores exhibited strong construct validity (r ≥ 0.66) compared with the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Using SALT scores, HL mean item scores were better (lower) in the 25–49% SALT subgroup versus those with highest SALT scores (76–100%); however, ES mean domain scores were better in the SALT 76–100% subgroup in the same comparison (p < 0.0001). Using AASIS and MCS score–created subgroups, ES and AL mean domain scores demonstrated hypothesized differences across subgroups (all p values < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The AAPPO questionnaire is a reliable, valid disease-specific measure of hair loss severity and impact in individuals with AA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00648-z.

Alopecia areata: Current understanding of the pathophysiology and update on therapeutic approaches, featuring the Japanese Dermatological Association guidelines

Alopecia areata (AA) is a relatively common nonscarring hairloss disease characterized by an autoimmune response to anagen hair follicles (HFs). Accumulated evidence suggests that collapse of the HF immune privilege subsequent to triggering events, represented by viral infection, leads to autoimmune response in which autoreactive cytotoxic CD8+NKG2D+ T cells mainly target exposed HF autoantigens. AA had been recognized as type 1 inflammatory disease, but recent investigations have suggested some roles of type 2- and Th17-associated mediators in AA pathogenesis. The significance of psychological stress in AA pathogenesis is less emphasized nowadays, but psychological comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety, attract greater interest in AA management. In this regard, the disease severity may not solely be evaluated by the extent of hair loss. Use of trichoscopy markedly improved the resolution of the diagnosis and evaluation of the phase of AA, which is indispensable for the optimization of treatment. For the standardization of AA management, the establishment of guidelines/expert consensus is pivotal. Indeed, the Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) and other societies and expert groups have published guidelines/expert consensus reports, which mostly recommend intralesional/topical corticosteroid administration and contact immunotherapy as first-line treatments, depending on the age, disease severity, and activity of AA. The uniqueness of the JDA guidelines can be found in their descriptions of intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy, antihistamines, and other miscellaneous domestically conducted treatments. Considering the relatively high incidence of spontaneous regression in mild AA and its intractability in severe subsets, the importance of course observation is also noted. Evidenced-based medicine for AA is currently limited, however, novel therapeutic approaches, represented by JAK inhibitors, are on their way for clinical application. In this review, the latest understanding of the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology, and update on therapeutic approaches with future perspectives are summarized for AA, following the current version of the JDA AA management guidelines.

Quality of life assessment in core outcome sets: A position statement of the EADV Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes

Core outcome sets (COSs) are an agreed standardized collection of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific clinical condition. Tsekhe aim of our position paper by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes was to identify the challenges and Patient Oriented Outcomes advantages in the development of COSs within dermatological QoL research. Twelve EADV Task Force multidisciplinary team members presented a total of 101 items (51 advantages and 50 disadvantages). All participants considered that COS are beneficial for comparison between different studies, treatments, dermatological diseases, geographical location and ethnicities. In conclusion, the EADV Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes has recognized the primacy of advantages of COS and deliberated that the disadvantages in COS are related to development process and use of COS.