Frequency of rebleeding events in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding with negative capsule endoscopy

Effect of Different Types of Antithrombotic Agents on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Small Bowel Bleeding Who Underwent Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy: A KASID Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The impact of different anti-thrombotic agents on patients with suspected small bowel bleeding (SSBB) who underwent balloon-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) is unclear. We aimed to examine the clinical effects and predictive factors of DAE based on the thromboembolic agents used.

METHODS

We enrolled 399 patients with SSBB from a web-based DAE registry across 30 medical centers in South Korea. Among them, 291 patients did not receive anti-thrombotic agents, whereas 80, 22, and 6 patients received anti-platelet agents, direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs), and warfarin, respectively.

RESULTS

Diagnostic yields were similar across groups; however, therapeutic yields differed: 25.4%, 37.5%, 63.6%, and 83.3% in patients treated with no anti-thrombotic agents, anti-platelets, DOACs, and warfarin, respectively (p < 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression revealed that patients treated with DOACs and warfarin experienced significantly higher therapeutic yields (odds ratio [OR]: 2.803 and 9.526, respectively; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.048-7.500 and 1.061-85.481, respectively; p = 0.040 and 0.044, respectively) than those treated with no anti-thrombotic agents. The re-bleeding rates in patients treated with no anti-thrombotic agents, anti-platelets, DOACs, and warfarin were 9.6%, 6.3%, 13.6%, and 50.0%, respectively (p = 0.069). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients treated with warfarin exhibited higher re-bleeding rates than those not treated with anti-thrombotic agents (OR: 9.393, 95% CI: 1.809-48.764, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of DAE did not differ based on the anti-thrombotic agent type, whereas the therapeutic yield of DAE in DOAC and warfarin users was high. Careful monitoring for re-bleeding is advised in DOAC as well as warfarin users.

Effect of antithrombotic therapies on small bowel bleeding: an European multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Small bowel bleeding (SBB) is the main indication for videocapsule endoscopy (VCE); the diagnostic yield (DY) could be influenced by antithrombotic therapies. We explored the effects of these therapies on SBB.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from two centers (Milan, Italy and Sheffield, UK) who underwent VCE between March 2001 and July 2020 were considered. Demographic data, clinical parameters, drug therapy, and technical characteristics of the procedure were collected. VCE findings and DY were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 957 patients (1,052 VCEs) underwent VCE for SBB (DY 50.6%, no retention); 27 patients (27 VCEs) received direct oral anticoagulants, 87 (88 VCEs) received other anticoagulants, 115 (135 VCEs) received antiplatelet therapy, 198 (218 VCEs) received monotherapy, and 31 (32 VCEs) received combined therapy. There were no differences in the completion rate, findings, and DYs between each subgroup or between monotherapy and combined therapy. The overt bleeding rate was similar in all groups, even when comparing antithrombotic users versus those not on therapy (p=0.59) or monotherapy versus combined therapy (p=0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

VCE is safe and has a high clinical impact on SBB. Antithrombotic therapies did not affect DY or overt bleeding rate and, consequently, can be considered safe in terms of SBB risk.

Long-term outcomes of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although small-bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) is widely used for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), long-term outcomes for OGIB patients after negative CE remain unclear. Herein, we defined negative CE as P0 (no bleeding potential) or P1 (less likely to bleed), based on the P classification using CE. We aimed to clarify long-term outcomes of patients with OGIB after negative CE.

METHODS

This single-center observational study enrolled 461 consecutive patients with OGIB who underwent CE from March 2014 to October 2021 and were followed up for >1 year. We examined rebleeding rates and predictive factors.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-four (49%) patients had P0, and 237 (51%) had P1 findings. Rebleeding occurred in 9% and 16% of patients in the P0 and P1 groups, respectively. Two patients in the P0 group and 15 in the P1 group showed rebleeding from the small bowel. The rate of small-bowel rebleeding was significantly lower in the P0 group than that in the P1 group (1% vs 6%, P = 0.002), as was the cumulative rebleeding rate (P = 0.004). In the multivariate analysis, history of endoscopic hemostasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 15.958, 95% confidence interval [CI]:4.950-51.447, P < 0.001) and P1 CE findings (HR = 9.989, 95% CI: 2.077-48.030, P = 0.004) were independently predicted small-bowel rebleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

OGIB with P0 CE findings rarely showed rebleeding from the small bowel. Rebleeding may occur in patients with OGIB. Patients with history of endoscopic hemostasis for small-bowel lesions or P1 CE findings should be followed up intensively.

Prediction models for recurrence in patients with small bowel bleeding

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) has traditionally been defined as gastrointestinal bleeding whose source remains unidentified after bidirectional endoscopy. OGIB can present as overt bleeding or occult bleeding, and small bowel lesions are the most common causes. The small bowel can be evaluated using capsule endoscopy, device-assisted enteroscopy, computed tomography enterography, or magnetic resonance enterography. Once the cause of small-bowel bleeding is identified and targeted therapeutic intervention is completed, the patient can be managed with routine visits. However, diagnostic tests may produce negative results, and some patients with small bowel bleeding, regardless of diagnostic findings, may experience rebleeding. Predicting those at risk of rebleeding can help clinicians form individualized surveillance plans. Several studies have identified different factors associated with rebleeding, and a limited number of studies have attempted to create prediction models for recurrence. This article describes prediction models developed so far for identifying patients with OGIB who are at greater risk of rebleeding. These models may aid clinicians in forming tailored patient management and surveillance.

Effect of small bowel transit time on accuracy of video capsule endoscopy in evaluating suspected small bowel bleeding

BACKGROUND

Obscure small bowel bleeding is defined as gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) that is unidentifiable with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and a colonoscopy with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) being the next gold standard step for evaluation. Small bowel transit time (SBTT) is a metric of a VCE study that is defined as the time the capsule takes to travel through the small intestine.

AIM

To determine if SBTT within the VCE study, correlates to overall detection of obscure small bowel bleeds. Furthermore, we attempted to identify any existing correlation between SBTT and re-bleeding after a negative VCE study.

METHODS

This is a single center retrospective analysis of VCE studies performed for overt and occult GIB at Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, between 2015 and 2019. Inclusion criteria primarily consisted of patients 18 years or older who had a VCE study done as part of the workup for a GIB. Patients with incomplete VCEs, poor preparation, or with less than 6 mo of follow up were excluded. A re-bleeding event was defined either as overt or occult within a 6-mo timeframe. Overt re-bleeding was defined as Visible melena or hematochezia with > 2 gm/dL drop in hemoglobin defined an overt re-bleeding event; whereas an unexplained > 2 gm/dL drop in hemoglobin with no visible bleeding defined an occult re-bleed.

RESULTS

Results indicated that there was a significant and positive point biserial correlation between SBTT of 220 min and detection of a bleeding focus with a statistically significant p value of 0.008. However, the area under the curve was negligible when trying to identify a threshold time for SBTT to discriminate between risk of re-bleeding events after a negative VCE.

CONCLUSION

In terms of SBTT and association with accuracy of VCE finding a bleeding focus, 220 min was found to be adequate transit time to accurately find a bleeding focus, when present. It was found that no threshold SBTT could be identified to help predict re-bleeding after a negative VCE.

Video Capsule Endoscopy and Device-Assisted Enteroscopy

Mark Hanscom Courtney Stead Harris Feldman Neil B. Marya David Cave.

Negative Video Capsule Endoscopy Had a High Negative Predictive Value for Small Bowel Lesions, but Diagnostic Capability May Be Lower in Young Patients with Overt Bleeding

Background

Patients with potential small bowel bleeding (PSBB) who have negative results of video capsule endoscopy (VCE), clinical course, rate of rebleeding, and missed lesions with their predictors are essential for further management decision.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients presenting with PSBB who had negative VCE findings between January 2008 and December 2016. All patients had to have at least two years of follow-up data to be included. Patients with <2 years of follow-up in their medical record were interviewed by telephone to determine if any unrecorded rebleeding episodes occurred.

Results

One hundred forty-two patients were included. The mean age was 60.9 years, and 52.8% were male. Eighty-one patients presented with overt bleeding. The median duration of follow-up was 5.08 years. During the follow-up period, 30 patients experienced rebleeding. The cumulative rate of rebleeding at 1, 2, and 5 years was 10.0%, 14.3%, and 22.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and presentation of overt bleeding to be independent predictors of rebleeding. There were only nine small bowel lesions (6.3%) missed by VCE. These nine patients, compared with others, were significantly younger and tended to present with overt bleeding.

Conclusion

Rebleeding was not uncommon in PSBB after negative VCE; however, the rate of missing small bowel lesions was low. Nonetheless, further investigations may be considered in young patients who present with overt bleeding.

Clinical Outcomes between P1 and P0 Lesions for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding with Negative Computed Tomography and Capsule Endoscopy

BACKGROUND

A simple classification for the relevance of lesions (P0, P1, and P2; no bleeding potential, less likely to bleed, and more likely to bleed, respectively) based on capsule endoscopy (CE) findings has been used. This study aimed at investigating rebleeding rates and predictive factors of P0 and P1 lesions after obtaining negative findings in both, CE and computed tomography (CT), for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).

METHODS

Among 193 patients resulted in negative CE findings defined as P0 or P1 lesions, 84 patients with negative results on CT images were enrolled in this study. The rebleeding rates and predictive factors were assessed in the P0 and P1 groups.

RESULTS

Overall rebleeding rate in patients with negative CT and CE was 17.9%; 18.4% in the P0 group; 17.4% in the P1 group within a median follow-up duration of 18.5 months. In the P0 and P1 groups, the cumulative rebleeding rates were 9.2%, 25.4%, and 25.4%, and 6.9%, 11.8%, and 18.6% at 12, 24, and 60 months, respectively (p = 0.97). There were no independent rebleeding associated factors in the P0 group, whereas Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.019, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.158-3.519, p = 0.013), and initial low hemoglobin (Hb) level (<8 g/dL) (HR = 15.085, 95% CI: 1.182-192.514, p = 0.037) were independent predictive factors responsible for rebleeding in the P1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite having negative findings on CT and CE, patients with OGIB have a significant potential rebleeding risk. Although there was no significant difference in rebleeding rates between the P0 and P1 groups on CE, the P1 group, with CCI or low initial Hb level, should be cautiously observed after the first bleeding episode.

Timing and Use of Capsule Endoscopy in the Acute Care Setting

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a crucial adjunct to conventional endoscopy in small intestinal bleeding, with a high positive and negative predictive value. Timing is critical in VCE, with earlier deployment associated with improved diagnostic yield. VCE is also useful as a first-line diagnostic modality in the evaluation of acute gastrointestinal bleeding, with accumulating evidence demonstrating expedited VCE can increase diagnostic yield, reduce unneeded admissions, and overall improve patient care. In resource-limited settings, first-line VCE also can reduce unneeded procedures and protect staff from dangerous exposures.

Re-bleeding and its predictors after capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in long-term follow-up

Background

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the preferred diagnostic test of choice in the investigation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Although, a conservative strategy is recommended in the short-term, for cases with a negative result from CE, the impact of CE on long-term re-bleeding still remains unclear. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the long-term re-bleeding rate along with predictors after CE in patients with OGIB.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients with OGIB, whom had received a CE examination, so as to investigate the cause of obscure GI bleeding; between July 2008 and March 2018. The patient’s characteristics, medication use, CE finding, treatments strategy, re-bleeding episodes and follow-up information were collected from the institutional electronic medical chart and CE database. Re-bleeding free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log rank test, whilst predictors associated with the re-bleeding episodes were analyzed via the use of Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

One hundred and thirty-three patients with OGIB, having received CE were enrolled in the analysis. The pool rate of re-bleeding was 26.3% (35/133) during a follow-up duration of 26 months after CE. Patients with positive CE study, without specific treatment, had higher rates of re-bleeding (47.6%) than those with positive study whom received specific treatment (25.7%), and negative study (20.8%) (p = 0.042). Although, the re-bleeding free survival was not significantly different among the groups (log rank test; P = 0.10). Re-bleeding events occurring within 6, 12, and 24 months after CE were 36, 64 and 92%, respectively. The high-frequency re-bleeding etiologies were the small bowel angiodysplasias and abnormal vascular lesions. Furthermore, independent predictors for re-bleeding after CE were patients with cirrhosis (hazard ratio, HR 4.06), incomplete CE visualization (HR 2.97), and a history of previous GI bleeding (HR 2.80).

Conclusions

The likelihood of re-bleeding after CE was higher in patients with positive CE study than those with negative study. Specific treatments, or therapeutic interventions for patients with detectable lesions reduced the probability of re-bleeding episodes in long-term follow-up. Close follow-up for recurrent bleeding is recommeded for at least 2 years after CE.

Early timing of single balloon enteroscopy is associated with increased diagnostic yield in patients with overt small bowel bleeding

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Although performing balloon enteroscopy soon after the onset of small bowel bleeding appeared to enhance diagnostic rate, the optimal timing was unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study in a single referral center. Patients with overt, suspected small bowel bleeding who underwent primary single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) were evaluated to determine the association between procedure timing and diagnostic yield rates.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were enrolled (47.7% males; mean age, 65.6 ± 18.1 years). They were stratified into four groups based on the timing of SBE: emergency (<24 h after onset or continued bleeding, n = 64), 24-72 h (n = 28), 3-7 days (n = 41), and >7 days (n = 87). A significant trend of decreasing diagnostic yields was observed across the groups (90.6%, 67.9%, 68.3%, and 44.8%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield rates were different between emergency and 24-72 h groups (P < 0.0001), and between 3 and 7 days and >7 days groups (P < 0.05), but not between 24 and 72 h and 3-7 days groups (P = 0.97). In multivariate regression analysis, emergency, ≤ 3 days, and ≤7 days SBEs had greater yield rates than SBEs at later timings.

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of diagnostic yield was highest when SBE was performed during continued bleeding or within 24 h of onset, and gradually declined as waiting time increased. We therefore recommend that SBE should be performed as soon as possible, preferably no later than seven days.

Performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) together with the United European Gastroenterology (UEG) recently developed a short list of performance measures for small-bowel endoscopy (i.e. small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy) with the final goal of providing endoscopy services across Europe with a tool for quality improvement. Six key performance measures both for small-bowel capsule endoscopy and for device-assisted enteroscopy were selected for inclusion, with the intention being that practice at both a service and endoscopist level should be evaluated against them. Other performance measures were considered to be less relevant, based on an assessment of their overall importance, scientific acceptability, and feasibility. Unlike lower and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, for which performance measures had already been identified, this is the first time small-bowel endoscopy quality measures have been proposed.

Repeat capsule endoscopy in suspected gastrointestinal bleeding

Objectives: This study aims to review the utility of repeat capsule endoscopy (CE) with on-going concern of small bowel (SB) bleeding following initial SB investigation with CE. Materials and methods: A specifically designed database of CE examinations performed over 13 years, with hospital records, was retrospectively interrogated for patients undergoing multiple CEs to investigate iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) or suspected SB bleeding. Results: 1335/2276 (58.7%) of CEs were performed to investigate IDA or SB bleeding; 92 were repeat CEs carried out for ongoing clinical concern. The median time interval between initial and repeat CE procedures was 466.5 (range 1-3066) days. Twenty-four patients had initially normal CE; on repeat examination, abnormalities were detected in 11/24 (45.8%). 3/21 (14.2%) of patients with angioectasia on first CE had alternative causes for IDA or GI bleeding detected on repeat CE. Six patients with active bleeding, without an identifiable source on initial CE, undergoing repeat CE had a cause isolated in 5/6 (83.3%). Changing CE device did not affect diagnostic yield (DY) compared to repeat CE using the same device (27.5% to 26.8%). Conclusions: It is known that CE can miss clinically relevant and serious lesions. Our results suggest that patients with an initially negative or inconclusive CE frequently have a cause of SB bleeding detected on repeat CE. The DY of repeat CE is highest in those with bleeding on their initial CE (83.3%) and lower in those with initially normal examinations (45.8%) or when an alternative cause, such as angioectasia is seen (14.2%).

Diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy for small bowel arteriovenous malformations in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Small bowel arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) pose a bleeding risk and have traditionally been diagnosed by invasive enteroscopic procedures in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Capsule endoscopy (CE) is emerging as a safe and non-invasive alternative for small intestinal evaluation, but its diagnostic yield and utility in diagnosing small bowel AVMs in HHT patients are understudied. The aim of this study was to meta-analyze the utility of CE for diagnosing AVMs in HHT patients. Methods  A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature on CE in HHT patients identified in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to March 2018 were conducted. Summary effects were estimated using a random effects model. Results  After applying exclusion criteria, five studies (n = 124 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled diagnostic yield for visualization of small bowel AVMs by CE was 77.0 % (95 % CI 65.8 - 85.4 %, P  < 0.001). Conclusions  CE has a good diagnostic yield for small bowel AVMs in HHT. It can be regarded as a sufficient, noninvasive diagnostic modality for identifying small bowel AVMs in HHT patients.

Antithrombotic Treatment Is Associated with Small-Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy Positive Findings in Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The impact of antithrombotic treatment on the findings of small-bowel capsule endoscopy for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding remains contentious. We aimed to determine the effect of these agents on small-bowel video capsule endoscopy positive findings.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting on patients receiving concurrent antithrombotic treatment, while undergoing capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Outcomes were the effect of antithrombotic therapy-overall and per type of antithrombotic agent-on the examination's positive findings and re-bleeding risk. The effect size of study outcomes is presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 1023 patients were included. We detected significant heterogeneity with no evidence of publication bias. Compared to antithrombotic drug nonusers, antithrombotic treatment was associated with an increased prevalence of positive findings [OR 1.98 (95% CI 1.34-2.93); P = 0.0006]. This effect did not differ between antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments [OR 2.22 (95% CI 1.28-3.84); P = 0.005 and 2.53 (95% CI 1.66-3.87); P < 0.0001, respectively]. Antithrombotic use over no use was not associated either with overt [OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.51-2.66); P = 0.71] or with occult [OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.38-1.95); P = 0.71] bleeding pattern. However, concurrent antithrombotic treatment was associated with higher odds for re-bleeding compared to no treatment [OR 2.53 (95% CI 1.46-4.37); P = 0.0009].

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic treatment is associated with more positive findings in small-bowel video capsule endoscopy in OGIB as well as higher odds of re-bleeding.

Rebleeding rate and risk factors in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy

OBJECTIVE

Limited evidence is available on rebleeding due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-induced enteropathy. Previous studies have primarily analyzed endoscopic findings. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate their clinical implications for patients. This study aimed to evaluate the rebleeding rate and its related risk factors in patients with NSAIDs-induced enteropathy.

METHODS

Of 402 patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding who were evaluated with capsule endoscopy, 49 were diagnosed with NSAIDs-induced enteropathy. The clinical characteristics of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. The Charlson comorbidity index was used to stratify the comorbidities. For patients who used additional drugs that influenced their tendency to bleeding, the odds ratio was calculated and used for a quantitative comparison.

RESULTS

The rebleeding rate in patients with NSAIDs-induced enteropathy was 20.4%, within a mean duration of 23.4 months. Age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR] 8.628, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.152-64.625), no additional use of mucoprotective agents (HR 11.712, 95% CI 1.278-76.098) and the continuation of NSAIDs after the first bleeding episode (HR 9.861, 95% CI 1.395-98.344) were independently related to rebleeding due to NSAIDs-induced enteropathy. The underlying comorbidities, drug-related rebleeding risk scores and therapeutic use of proton pump inhibitors were not significantly different (P = 0.209, 0.212 and 0.720, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-fifth of patients with NSAIDs-induced enteropathy showed rebleeding within 2 years. A careful long-term follow-up should be offered to elderly patients with NSAIDs-induced enteropathy who need continuous NSAID treatment without the additional use of mucoprotective medications.

Meta-analysis shows similar re-bleeding rates among Western and Eastern populations after index video capsule endoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is the first-line diagnostic procedure for investigating obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Different re-bleeding rates following index VCE have been reported among Western and Eastern studies.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies examining re-bleeding rates after VCE for OGIB. Meta-analysis assessed the pooled proportion of re-bleeding events after VCE for OGIB according to study's origin (Western vs. Eastern) and according to the length of follow-up (≥24 months vs. <24 months). We also calculated the re-bleeding odds ratios (OR; 95% CI) after positive vs. negative index VCE, overt vs. occult initial presentation of bleeding and after interventional treatment for positive index cases, according to the study's origin.

RESULTS

We included 46 (30 Western and 16 Eastern) studies with 5796 patients. Significant heterogeneity was detected among meta-analyzed studies. Overall, the pooled re-bleeding rate was similar between Western (29%; 95% CI: 23-34) and Eastern (21%; 95% CI: 15-27) populations, irrespective of the length of follow-up. The odds of re-bleeding was significantly higher after positive as compared to negative index VCE in Eastern studies (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.07-2.94). Application of specific treatment after positive index VCE was associated with lower re-bleeding odds in both Western (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16-0.87) and Eastern (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.72) populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing VCE for OGIB have similar re-bleeding rates in the East and the West, regardless of the length of follow-up. However, increased re-bleeding odds after positive index VCE is observed in Eastern studies.

Clinical outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding during antithrombotic drug therapy

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) during antithrombotic drug therapy has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

Patients who underwent video capsule endoscopy (VCE) for the investigation of OGIB at Okayama University Hospital from January 2009 to March 2016 were enrolled. We evaluated the VCE findings, the patterns of OGIB, and the rate of rebleeding within 1 year in antithrombotic drug users and antithrombotic drug nonusers.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were enrolled. Among the antithrombotic drug users, the rate of VCE positivity in the patients with overt OGIB was significantly higher in comparison with patients with occult OGIB (45% versus 16%, p = 0.014), whereas there was no significant difference among the antithrombotic drug nonusers (27% versus 26%, p = 1.0). Among the antithrombotic drug users, the rate of rebleeding among the VCE-positive patients was significantly higher in comparison with the VCE-negative patients (50% versus 5.9%, p = 0.011). Moreover, among antithrombotic drug users who did not receive therapeutic intervention, the rate of rebleeding among the VCE-positive patients was significantly higher in comparison with the VCE-negative patients (75% versus 6.3%, p = 0.001). However, among the antithrombotic drug nonusers who did not receive therapeutic intervention, the rebleeding rate of the VCE-positive patients was not significantly different from that of the VCE-negative patients (20% versus 9.4%, p = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic intervention should be considered for patients with overt OGIB who are VCE positive and who use antithrombotic drugs due to the high risk of rebleeding.

Lanreotide in the management of small bowel angioectasias: seven-year data from a tertiary centre

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Haemorrhage from small bowel angioectasias (SBAs) can be debilitating to patients who are very often elderly and have multiple comorbidities. Our aim was to assess the use of lanreotide in addition to endotherapy in patients with SBAs.

METHOD

Patients with SBAs on capsule endoscopy (CE) who received lanreotide injections from January 2010 to till the present day at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield were included. Baseline demographics were recorded. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of improvement in mean haemoglobin, transfusion requirements and bleeding episodes.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (67% males, mean age 74 SD ± 15.5 years) were included. All patients had multiple comorbidities. Lanreotide was given at a dosage of 60 mg (42%), 90 mg (33%) or 120 mg (25%). It was given at a four-week interval in 75% of patients and at a six-week interval in 17% of patients. One patient (8%) received a single dose. The mean duration of treatment was 19 months SD ± 14.5. Only 17% of patients had their lanreotide stopped due to cholelithiasis. There was a significant improvement in mean haemoglobin: 86.8 versus 98.0 (131-166 g/L, p = .012). The mean number of bleeding episodes (4.18 versus 1.09, p = .010) and packed red cells (323 versus 152, p = .006) received improved. Patients required less DBEs ± APCs after starting lanreotide (19 versus 11 p = .048).

CONCLUSION

Lanreotide is a useful adjuvant treatment to therapeutic enteroscopy in patients with refractory obscure gastrointestinal bleeding due to SBAs. It improves haemoglobin levels, reduces transfusion requirements, bleeding episodes and number of DBEs. Overall, it has a good safety profile.

Long-term effects of video capsule endoscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) accounts for approximately 5% of all gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhages. It usually arises from a small bowel lesion beyond the reach of conventional endoscopy including esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) revolutionized the evaluation of OGIB patients since it allows reliable and noninvasive visualization of the small bowel mucosal surface. Since 2001, VCE has evolved into an efficient technology integrated in clinical practice. It is the cornerstone in the algorithm of OGIB investigation given its high diagnostic yield, which compares favorably to that of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). In terms of outcomes, a positive index VCE examination usually correlates to a high re-bleeding rate, while a negative one provides adequate evidence of low re-bleeding risk, suggesting a wait and watch approach in this subset of patients. Additionally, a variety of factors has been acknowledged as significant predictors of re-bleeding episodes. While research data regarding immediate endoscopic findings have matured, data concerning the clinical utility of VCE in patients with OGIB on the long-term remain sparse. This manuscript reviews the current literature, aiming to highlight the role of VCE in the long-term management of OGIB.

Re-bleeding events in patients with small intestinal vascular malformation: Risk factors and effect of treatment with thalidomide

AIM

To investigate the risk factors for re-bleeding events in patients with small intestinal vascular malformation and assess the influence of thalidomide on the re-bleeding rate.

METHODS

This study involved patients with gastrointestinal bleeding referred to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University for capsule endoscopy (CE) and enteroscopy between January 2012 and December 2014. Only patients with small intestinal vascular malformation were included in the study. Follow-up data were obtained through medical records review, telephone interviews or follow-up clinic visits to identify the risk factors associated with re-bleeding. Based on the follow-up data, the re-bleeding rate was compared between patients who had been treated with thalidomide and those who had not.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were included in the study, and all of them completed the follow-up, with a mean follow-up duration of 10.78 ± 7.64 mo. Multiple regression analysis identified that presence of hypertension (HR = 1.994, 95%CI: 1.236-3.125, P = 0.005), multiple lesions (≥3) (HR = 1.644, 95%CI: 1.002-2.703, P = 0.049) and liver cirrhosis (HR = 2.116, 95%CI: 1.063-4.212, P = 0.033) were significant independent predictors of re-bleeding, while treatment with thalidomide was a protecting factor (HR = 0.497, 95%CI: 0.303-0.816, P = 0.006). The cumulative re-bleeding rates in patients who were treated with thalidomide and those who were not were 35.71% and 54.65%, respectively, and the difference reached statistical significance (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The re-bleeding rate in patients with small bowel vascular malformation is relatively high, especially those with hypertension, multiple lesions (≥3) and liver cirrhosis. Repeated CE or enteroscopy is recommended for those patients with risk factors for re-bleeding within 2 years. Treatment with thalidomide for patients without contraindication can reduce the re-bleeding rate.

Clinical outcomes of negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy for small-bowel bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Small-bowel bleeding is the primary indication for capsule endoscopy (CE). Many experts advocate a "watch-and-wait" policy in negative CE. This meta-analysis examines the odds of rebleeding after negative index CE and the impact on long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search identified articles examining the rebleeding rate after negative CE. Demographic and clinical information with emphasis on outcomes was retrieved, pooled, and analyzed. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. A random effects model was used as the pooling method because of high heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The primary outcome evaluated was the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for rebleeding after a negative CE for obscure GI bleeding (OGIB).

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies with 3657 patients were included. The pooled rate of rebleeding after negative CE was .19 (95% CI, .14-.25; P < .0001). The pooled OR of rebleeding was .59 (95% CI, .37-.95; P < .001). The effect was more pronounced in studies with a short follow-up (OR, .47; 95% CI, .24-.94; P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in rebleeding after CE for occult and overt OGIB. Prospective studies showed a lower OR of rebleeding of .24 (95% CI, .08-.73; P = .01). Most studies were high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that negative CE provides adequate evidence of a subsequently low risk of rebleeding. Such patients can therefore be safely managed with watchful waiting. However, patients who rebleed after 2 years may need to be investigated for a new source of blood loss.

The role of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in older individuals

BACKGROUND/AIM

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is currently recommended as the first-line diagnostic modality for the investigation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CE and to determine the subsequent impacts on the treatment of the OGIB episode in older individuals.

METHODS

Eight hundred and fifty-three patients who underwent CE for the indication of OGIB were investigated in a single center between January 2004 and December 2015. Patients were divided into two groups: those 65 years of age and older and those younger than 65 years of age.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between older patients and younger patients with respect to the CE completion rate. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher in older patients than in younger patients (55.1 vs. 46.6%, P=0.021). Vascular lesions were the main cause of bleeding in the elderly, whereas ulcerated/erosive lesions were found most frequently in younger patients. Furthermore, 56.0% of older patients with positive CE results had relevant changes in their management plans and received specific treatment on the basis of CE findings.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the important role of CE in the diagnosis of OGIB and its huge impact on decision making in the management plan for older patients.

Detection of suspected small bowel bleeding: challenges and controversies

Detection of small bowel (SB) bleeding remains a challenge to gastroenterologists, with a dearth of standardized recommendations regarding evaluation and management. Areas covered: A recursive literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane and Medline databases for original and review articles on SB and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Based upon the available literature, this review outlines the main challenges and controversies, and provides a practical and cost-effective approach towards SB bleeding. Expert commentary: SB bleeding is suspected in patients with persistent or recurrent bleeding after negative bidirectional endoscopy, and unexplained iron deficiency anemia. Selection of test(s) should be individualized based upon patient presentation and suspicion for type of underlying lesion. Endoscopic or radiologic evaluation and treatment is the mainstay in the majority of patients, while pharmacologic agents may have a role in patients with refractory bleeding, and those unable to undergo evaluation.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Bleeding

Bleeding from the small intestine remains a relatively uncommon event, accounting for ~5-10% of all patients presenting with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Given advances in small bowel imaging with video capsule endoscopy (VCE), deep enteroscopy, and radiographic imaging, the cause of bleeding in the small bowel can now be identified in most patients. The term small bowel bleeding is therefore proposed as a replacement for the previous classification of obscure GI bleeding (OGIB). We recommend that the term OGIB should be reserved for patients in whom a source of bleeding cannot be identified anywhere in the GI tract. A source of small bowel bleeding should be considered in patients with GI bleeding after performance of a normal upper and lower endoscopic examination. Second-look examinations using upper endoscopy, push enteroscopy, and/or colonoscopy can be performed if indicated before small bowel evaluation. VCE should be considered a first-line procedure for small bowel investigation. Any method of deep enteroscopy can be used when endoscopic evaluation and therapy are required. VCE should be performed before deep enteroscopy if there is no contraindication. Computed tomographic enterography should be performed in patients with suspected obstruction before VCE or after negative VCE examinations. When there is acute overt hemorrhage in the unstable patient, angiography should be performed emergently. In patients with occult hemorrhage or stable patients with active overt bleeding, multiphasic computed tomography should be performed after VCE or CTE to identify the source of bleeding and to guide further management. If a source of bleeding is identified in the small bowel that is associated with significant ongoing anemia and/or active bleeding, the patient should be managed with endoscopic therapy. Conservative management is recommended for patients without a source found after small bowel investigation, whereas repeat diagnostic investigations are recommended for patients with initial negative small bowel evaluations and ongoing overt or occult bleeding.

Re-bleeding events in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy

AIM: To investigate long-term re-bleeding events after a negative capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) and the risk factors associated with the procedure.

METHODS: Patients referred to Hospital Egas Moniz (Lisboa, Portugal) between January 2006 and October 2012 with OGIB and a negative capsule endoscopy were retrospectively analyzed. The following study variables were included: demographic data, comorbidities, bleeding-related drug use, hemoglobin level, indication for capsule endoscopy, post procedure details, work-up and follow-up. Re-bleeding rates and associated factors were assessed using a Cox proportional hazard analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of re-bleeding at 1, 3 and 5 years, and the differences between factors were evaluated.

RESULTS: The study population consisted of 640 patients referred for OGIB investigation. Wireless capsule endoscopy was deemed negative in 113 patients (17.7%). A total of 64.6% of the population was female, and the median age was 69 years. The median follow-up was forty-eight months (interquartile range 24-60). Re-bleeding occurred in 27.4% of the cases. The median time to re-bleeding was fifteen months (interquartile range 2-33). In 22.6% (n = 7) of the population, small-bowel angiodysplasia was identified as the culprit lesion. A univariate analysis showed that age > 65 years old, chronic kidney disease, aortic stenosis, anticoagulant use and overt OGIB were risk factors for re-bleeding; however, on a multivariate analysis, there were no risk factors for re-bleeding. The cumulative risk of re-bleeding at 1, 3 and 5 years of follow-up was 12.9%, 25.6% and 31.5%, respectively. Patients who presented with overt OGIB tended to re-bleed sooner (median time for re-bleeding: 8.5 mo vs 22 mo).

CONCLUSION: Patients with OGIB despite a negative capsule endoscopy have a significant re-bleeding risk; therefore, these patients require an extended follow-up strategy.

Long-term outcome in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with rebleeding and long-term outcomes after capsule endoscopy (CE) for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) in a follow-up study.

METHODS

Data of consecutive patients who underwent CE due to OGIB from June 2002 to January 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with rebleeding, while Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test were used to analyze cumulative rebleeding rates.

RESULTS

The overall rebleeding rate after CE in patients with OGIB was 28.6% (97/339) during a median follow-up of 48 months (range 12-112 months). Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.473, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.576-3.881, P = 0.000), positive CE findings (HR 3.393, 95% CI 1.931-5.963, P = 0.000), hemoglobin ≤70 g/L before CE (HR 2.010, 95% CI 1.261-3.206, P = 0.003), nonspecific treatments (HR 2.500, 95% CI 1.625-3.848, P = 0.000) and the use of anticoagulants, antiplatelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after CE (HR 2.851, 95% CI 1.433-5.674, P = 0.003) were independent risk factors associated with rebleeding. Univariate analysis showed that chronic hepatitis was independently associated with rebleeding in CE-negative patients (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

CE has a significant impact on the long-term outcome of patients with OGIB. Further investigation and close follow-up in patients with OGIB and those with negative CE findings are necessary.

Video capsule endoscopy: perspectives of a revolutionary technique

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) was launched in 2000 and has revolutionized direct endoscopic imaging of the gut. VCE is now a first-line procedure for exploring the small bowel in cases of obscure digestive bleeding and is also indicated in some patients with Crohn's disease, celiac disease, and polyposis syndrome. A video capsule has also been designed for visualizing the esophagus in order to detect Barrett's esophagus or esophageal varices. Different capsules are now available and differ with regard to dimensions, image acquisition rate, battery life, field of view, and possible optical enhancements. More recently, the use of VCE has been extended to exploring the colon. Within the last 5 years, tremendous developments have been made toward increasing the capabilities of the colon capsule. Although colon capsule cannot be proposed as a first-line colorectal cancer screening procedure, colon capsule may be used in patients with incomplete colonoscopy or in patients who are unwilling to undergo colonoscopy. In the near future, new technological developments will improve the diagnostic yield of VCE and broaden its therapeutic capabilities.

Evaluation and outcomes of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is defined as recurrent or persistent bleeding or presence of iron deficiency anaemia after evaluation with a negative bidirectional endoscopy. OGIB accounts for 5% of gastrointestinal bleeding and presents a diagnostic challenge. Current modalities available for the investigation of OGIB include capsule endoscopy, balloon assisted enteroscopy, spiral enteroscopy and computed tomography enterography. These modalities overcome the limitations of previous techniques. Following a negative bidirectional endoscopy, capsule endoscopy and double balloon enteroscopy remain the cornerstone of investigation in OGIB given their high diagnostic yield. Long-term outcome data in patients with OGIB is limited, but is most promising for capsule endoscopy. This article reviews the current literature and provides an overview of the clinical evaluation of patients with OGIB, available diagnostic and therapeutic modalities and long-term clinical outcomes.

New evidence on the impact of antithrombotics in patients submitted to small bowel capsule endoscopy for the evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Objectives. Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) plays a decisive role in the obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) diagnosis. Antithrombotics may increase bleeding risk in patients with preexistent lesions or through direct mucosal aggression. We aimed to correlate antithrombotics usage with lesions with bleeding potential found in SBCE. Methods. Retrospective single-center study including 274 consecutive SBCE performed over 7 years for OGIB. The lesions were classified as P0 (no bleeding potential), P1 (uncertain bleeding potential: erosions), and P2 (high bleeding potential: angioectasias, ulcers, and tumors). We assessed antiplatelet and anticoagulant drug use during the 60 days preceding SBCE. Results. One-third of the patients were under antithrombotic therapy. The diagnostic yield of SBCE for P2 lesions was 30.0%. Angioectasias (20.4%) were the most frequently observed lesions. There was a significant correlation between anticoagulant drug use and a higher incidence of P2 lesions in the small bowel (43.2% versus 26.5%; OR = 2.11, P = 0.026). We found no significant correlation between antiplatelets and lesions with bleeding potential in SBCE. Conclusions. Small bowel lesions with high bleeding potential were more frequently detected when the patient was on anticoagulant drugs, resulting in a twofold risk. Antiplatelet drugs were not associated with small bowel lesions.

Predictive factor of re-bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: over 1-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is now widely accepted as a first-line diagnostic modality for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), with a high diagnostic yield compared to other modalities. However, even after negative CE examination, re-bleeding is often known to occur. The aim of the present study was to identify predictive factors of re-bleeding after negative CE, and to clarify the clinical utility of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) after negative CE for OGIB.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixty patients who underwent CE for OGIB between October 2007 and September 2012 were included, and followed up for at least 1 year after CE examination. Demographic and clinical parameters associated with re-bleeding after negative CE were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients (59.2%) had negative findings. Thirteen of those patients (8.4%) had one or more re-bleeding episodes during the follow-up period. In comparing patients with and without re-bleeding, Cox hazard regression analysis revealed that advanced age was a predictive factor for re-bleeding after negative CE (hazard ratio 1.05 [1.01-1.10], P = 0.03). Subsequent DBE for reasons other than re-bleeding was carried out in 51 patients (33.1%). Mucosal lesions (ulcer or multiple erosions) were subsequently detected in seven patients (13.7%), and endoscopic therapies were carried out in two patients (3.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients of advanced age, more extensive follow up is needed, even if the CE result is negative. In addition, DBE subsequent to negative CE may be useful to detect lesions that were overlooked on CE.

Negative capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding reliable: recurrence of bleeding on long-term follow-up

AIM

To assess the rate of recurrent bleeding of the small bowel in patients with obscure bleeding already undergone capsule endoscopy (CE) with negative results.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records related to 696 consecutive CE performed from December 2002 to January 2011, focusing our attention on patients with recurrence of obscure bleeding and negative CE. Evaluating the patient follow-up, we analyzed the recurrence rate of obscure bleeding in patient with a negative CE. Actuarial rates of rebleeding during follow-up were calculated, and factors associated with rebleeding were assessed through an univariate and multivariate analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of negative CE were calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seven out of 696 (29.7%) CE studies resulted negative in patient with obscure/overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, 489 CE (70.2%) were positive studies. The median follow-up was 24 mo (range 12-36 mo). During follow-up, recurrence of obscure bleeding was observed only in 34 out of 207 negative CE patients (16.4%); 26 out of 34 with obscure overt bleeding and 8 out of 34 with obscure occult bleeding. The younger age (< 65 years) and the onset of bleeding such as melena are independent risk factors of rebleeding after a negative CE (OR = 2.6703, 95%CI: 1.1651-6.1202, P = 0.0203; OR 4.7718, 95%CI: 1.9739-11.5350, P = 0.0005). The rebleeding rate (CE+ vs CE-) was 16.4% vs 45.1% (χ(2) test, P = 0.00001). The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV were 93.8%, 100%, 100%, 80.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and negative CE had a significantly lower rebleeding rate, and further invasive investigations can be deferred.