Incidence and treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The concept of immunothrombosis in pancreas transplantation

Early failure of a pancreatic allograft due to complete thrombosis has an incidence of approximately 10% and is the main cause of comorbidity in pancreas transplantation. Although several risk factors have been identified, the exact mechanisms leading to this serious complication are still unclear. In this review, we define the roles of the individual components involved during sterile immunothrombosis-namely endothelial cells, platelets, and innate immune cells. Further, we review the published evidence linking the main risk factors for pancreatic thrombosis to cellular activation and vascular modifications. We also explore the unique features of the pancreas itself: the vessel endothelium, specific vascularization, and relationship to other organs-notably the spleen and adipose tissue. Finally, we summarize the therapeutic possibilities for the prevention of pancreatic thrombosis depending on the different mechanisms such as anticoagulation, anti-inflammatory molecules, endothelium protectors, antagonism of damage-associated molecular patterns, and use of machine perfusion.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with pancreatitis: Outcome and impact of anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

Splanchnic venous thrombosis (SVT) is a frequent complication of acute pancreatitis (AP) and may worsen the prognosis. There are no definite recommendations for the management of SVT. Our objectives were to analyze the recanalization rate and short and long-term complications of SVT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study, which included patients hospitalized for AP complicated by SVT within the first 30 days. The primary endpoint was venous recanalization. Secondary endpoints were portal hypertension, gastrointestinal bleeding, complications of anticoagulation, and mortality.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2018, 711 patients were hospitalized with AP; 121 (17 %) developed SVT and 88 were included in the analysis. Venous thrombosis involved the portal vein (27 %), splenic vein (21 %), superior mesenteric vein (16 %), 2 sites (19 %) or 3 sites (14 %). Of them, 78 % of patients received anticoagulation. After a median follow-up of 30 months, thrombosed vessel(s) got recanalized in 42 % of patients within a median of 7 months. Thrombosis extension was observed in 18 % of patients. The only factor associated with non-recanalization was portal vein or multi-site involvement (p = 0.004). Anticoagulation treatment was not associated with a higher rate of recanalization. Portal hypertension developed in 56 % of patients and varices rupture occurred in 9 % of patients. The only predictive factor of portal hypertension was non-recanalization of the thrombosed vessel (p < 0,001).

CONCLUSION

Recanalization was observed in 42 % of patients with SVT complicating in AP. Non-recanalization was the only risk for portal hypertension. Our study suggests an absence of benefit of anticoagulation.

The management of splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: a global DELPHI consensus study

BACKGROUND

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) occurs in 17%-23 % of acute pancreatitis cases. Serious sequelae include hepatic and bowel ischaemia. However, management with therapeutic anticoagulation remains controversial due to potential bleeding risk. We aim to determine the level of consensus on prognosis, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of SpVT through a DELPHI process.

METHODS

Using purposive, non-probability sampling and DELPHI methodology, 173 clinicians with experience of SpVT in acute pancreatitis were approached. From April 2022 to April 2023, a three-round DELPHI process was implemented to completion. A total of 88 statements were posed for ranking via a four-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

The mean acute pancreatitis caseload per respondent per year was 68·0, 72·6 and 73·0 for DELPHI rounds 1,2 and 3 respectively. For SpVT anatomical location, there was strong consensus favouring anticoagulation for portal vein (89·1 %) and SMV thrombosis (90·9 %), and no consensus to treat splenic vein thrombosis (47·3 %). 74·1 % rejected radiological resolution as a definitive anticoagulation endpoint. Majority consensus favoured death, bleeding risk, bowel or liver ischaemia, hospital admission length and ITU admission as significant outcomes for experimental research design.

CONCLUSION

There was significant consensus for anticoagulation treatment of SpVT of the portal and superior mesenteric veins, especially with complete occlusion by thrombosis. Randomised controlled trials are required to grade management recommendations.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis: management for the thrombosis specialist

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SpVT) is an uncommon site of venous thrombosis that is associated with complications including portal hypertension and hepatic dysfunction. The evaluation and management of this patient population has evolved in recent years, but there are limited data from clinical trials to guide management. Given the various acquired and biologic risk factors leading to the development of SpVT and the potential complications that can arise from it, input from a multidisciplinary team can be valuable in managing such patients, including thrombosis specialists or hematologists, gastroenterologists or hepatologists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons. In this article, we present 4 cases that highlight important issues and considerations in the evaluation of SpVT, including initial diagnostic approach in a patient with a new diagnosis of SpVT, considerations for anticoagulant therapy, management of SpVT in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, and the role of interventional vascular procedures in the management of SpVT. By reviewing the current literature, we address clinically relevant questions that are posed to clinicians managing patients with SpVT; we also point out gaps in our current knowledge that merit future investigation.

Incidence and Management of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Pancreatic Diseases

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in pancreatic disease has a 20%-30% incidence rate, leading to increased mortality and complication rates. Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize recent evidence about the incidence, risk factors, and management of pancreatic cancer, pancreatic cystic neoplasm-, and pancreatitis-related SVT. Doppler ultrasound should be the first imaging choice, followed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Data regarding SVT treatment in acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer are scarce; however, for venous thromboembolism treatment, direct oral anticoagulants and low molecular weight heparin have been effective. Further trials must investigate the length of anticoagulant treatment and the need for interventional radiological procedures.

Incidence and impact of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain common and potentially lethal disease entities. AP might be an important trigger of systemic inflammtion and may activate the coagulation system with increased VTE risk.

METHODS

The German nationwide inpatient sample was screened for patients admitted due to AP (ICD-code K85) 2005-2019. AP hospitalizations were stratified for VTE as well as risk-factors and the impact of VTE on in-hospital case-fatality rate were investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 797,364 hospitalizations of patients due to AP (aged in median 56.0 [IQR 44.0-71.0] years), 39.2 % females) were detected in Germany 2005-2019. Incidence of VTE in hospitalized AP patients was 1764.8 per 100,000 hospitalizations (1.8 %) with highest VTE rate between 5th and 6th decade. Cancer (OR 1.656 [95 %CI 1.513-1.812], P < 0.001), any surgery (OR 4.063 [95 %CI 3.854-4.284], P < 0.001), and heart failure (OR 1.723 [95 %CI 1.619-1.833], P < 0.001) were independently associated with VTE occurrence. Case-fatality (8.8 % vs. 2.7 %, P < 0.001) was more than 3-fold higher in AP patients with than without VTE. VTE was associated with increased case-fatality in AP patients (OR 3.925 [95 %CI 3.684-4.181], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

VTE is a life-threatening event in hospitalized AP patients associated with an almost 4-fold increased case-fatality rate. Cancer, any surgery, thrombophilia and heart failure were important risk factors for occurrence of VTE in AP.

Development of a nomogram for predicting pancreatic portal hypertension in patients with acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic portal hypertension (PPH) is a rare complication of acute pancreatitis (AP) that can lead to severe gastrointestinal bleeding. The risk factors associated with PPH, as well as the overall prognosis, warrant further investigation. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram to predict PPH in patients with AP.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with AP from 2015 to 2023 were retrospectively included in the study. Demographic data, clinical manifestations within the first week of AP onset, and initial contrast-enhanced CT findings were used to develop the predictive model. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for PPH. Based on the results of the multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. The accuracy and discriminative power of the predictive model were assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operating characteristic curve and the calibration curve.

RESULTS

Of the 1473 patients with AP, 107 (7.3%) developed PPH within 6 months (range: 2-22 months) during follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) (HR, 1.10; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.16; p=0.001), moderately severe grade (HR, 9.36; 95% CI 4.58 to 19.13; p<0.001), severe grade (HR, 12.95; 95% CI 6.22 to 26.94; p<0.001), diabetes (HR, 2.26; 95% CI 1.47 to 3.47; p<0.001), acute fluid accumulation (HR, 2.13; 95% CI 1.31 to 3.47; p=0.002), and necrosis (HR, 3.64; 95% CI 2.30 to 5.78; p<0.001) were independent risk factors for PPH. A nomogram for predicting PPH was developed, with the predictive curves showing an AUC of 0.859 at 6 months and 0.846 at 9 months. In the validation set, the AUC at both time points was 0.812.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we identified BMI, moderately severe or severe AP, diabetes, acute fluid accumulation, and necrosis as risk factors for AP-related PPH. Using the largest cohort of patients with AP to date, we developed a highly accurate nomogram with strong discriminative ability for predicting PPH. Future studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our findings and conduct external validation.

Effectiveness and safety of low molecular weight heparin in the management of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may play a role in mitigating the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesise existing evidence on the effectiveness and safety of LMWH in the treatment of moderately-severe and severe AP.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 update of the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and EMBASE, covering studies published up to February 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (n-RCTs) that reported the differences in the outcomes of AP for patients receiving LMWH in addition to the standard treatment (Intervention), compared to patients managed by standard treatment without LMWH (Control) were eligible. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) and mean differences (MD) with the corresponding 95% CI.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, all published between 2004 and 2022. Eight studies were RCTs, and five were n-RCTs. Data from 13,709 patients (6.971 Interventions and 6.738 Controls) were analysed. The comparison of Intervention and Control groups showed the superiority of LMWH to standard treatments in terms of overall mortality (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.31; 0.64, P < 0.0001, I2 = 51%), acute necrotic collections (RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.09; 0.62, P = 0.003, I2 = 0%), and organ failure (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48; 0.93, P = 0.02, I2 = 78%). The Intervention group showed superior outcomes compared with the Control group for gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44; 0.94, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%), length of hospital stay (MD= - 6.08, 95% CI = - 10.08; - 2.07, P = 0.003, I2 = 98%), need for operative interventions (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.29; 0.87, P = 0.01, I2 = 61%), and vascular thrombosis (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.31; 0.61, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate to high-quality evidence suggests that early intervention with LMWH could improve the prognosis of non-mild AP in terms of mortality, organ failure, and decreased incidence of vascular thrombosis. In light of our findings, integrating LMWH into the treatment regimen for moderate-severe to severe AP is advocated.

Endoscopic management of pancreatic collections. Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) Clinical Guidelines

Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can develop complications such as fluid collections and necrosis. Infection of necrosis occurs in about 20-40 % of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with organ failure and worse prognosis. In the past few years the treatment of pancreatic collections has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. These guidelines from a selection of experts among the Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) are intended to provide advice on the management of pancreatic collections based on a thorough review of the available scientific evidence. It also reflects the experience and clinical practice of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or clinical pancreatologists with extensive experience in managing patients with acute pancreatitis.

Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: The State-of-the-Art on Anticoagulant Treatment

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a rare type of venous thromboembolism occurring within the splanchnic venous system. Portal vein thrombosis is the most common presentation, while Budd-Chiari syndrome is the least common. Liver cirrhosis and abdominal solid cancer are the main local risk factors for SVT, whereas myeloproliferative neoplasms are the predominant systemic risk factors. Signs and symptoms of SVT are nonspecific and include abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. Asymptomatic SVT is not uncommon, and the majority would be detected incidentally on routine abdominal imaging performed for the follow-up of liver diseases and tumors. The management of SVT aims to prevent thrombus progression, promote vessel recanalization, and prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulation should be started early in order to increase the chances of vessel recanalization and reduce the risk of portal hypertension-related complications. Direct oral anticoagulants have been included in recent guidelines, as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists, after clinical stability has been reached; however, caution is required in patients with liver or kidney dysfunction. Treatment duration is based on the presence (or absence) and type (transient vs. permanent) of risk factors. This narrative review aims to summarize the latest evidence on SVT, with a particular focus on the anticoagulant treatment in special categories of patients (e.g., liver cirrhosis, solid cancer, myeloproliferative neoplasms, pancreatitis, incidentally detected SVT, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and chronic SVT).

The risk of developing splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis increases 3 days after symptom onset: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Splanchnic vein thrombosis is a complication of acute pancreatitis (AP) and is likely often underdiagnosed.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to understand the time course and risk factors of splanchnic vein thrombosis in the early phase of AP.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42022367578). Inclusion criteria were appropriate imaging techniques in adult AP patients, studies that reported splanchnic vein thrombosis data from the early phase, and reliable information on the timing of imaging in relation to the onset of pancreatitis symptoms or hospital admission. The proportion of patients with thrombosis with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using random-effects meta-analyses, and multiple subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Data from 1951 patients from 14 studies were analyzed. The proportion of patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis within 12 days after symptom onset was 0.13 (CI 0.07-0.23). The occurrence was lowest at 0.06 (CI 0.03-0.1) between 0 and 3 days after symptom onset, and increased fourfold to 0.23 (CI 0.16-0.31) between 3 and 11 days. On hospital admission, the proportion of patients affected was 0.12 (CI 0.02-0.49); it was 0.17 (CI 0.03-0.58) 1-5 days after admission. The prevalence in mild, moderate, and severe AP was 0.15 (CI 0.05-0.36), 0.26 (CI 0.15-0.43), and 0.27 (CI 0.17-0.4), respectively. Alcoholic etiology (0.31, CI 0.13-0.58) and pancreatic necrosis (0.55, CI 0.29-0.78, necrosis above 30%) correlated with increased SVT prevalence.

CONCLUSION

The risk of developing splanchnic vein thrombosis is significant in the early stages of AP and may affect up to a quarter of patients. Alcoholic etiology, pancreatic necrosis, and severity may increase the prevalence of splanchnic vein thrombosis.

Splanchnic vein thrombosis in necrotizing pancreatitis: a post-hoc analysis of a nationwide prospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines for splanchnic vein thrombosis in necrotizing pancreatitis are lacking due to insufficient data on the full clinical spectrum.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc analysis of a nationwide prospective necrotizing pancreatitis cohort. Multivariable analyses were used to identify risk factors and compare the clinical course of patients with and without SVT.

RESULTS

SVT was detected in 97 of the 432 included patients (22%) (median onset: 4 days). Risk factors were left, central, or subtotal necrosis (OR 28.52; 95% CI 20.11-40.45), right or diffuse necrosis (OR 5.76; 95% CI 3.89-8.51), and younger age (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.97). Patients with SVT had higher rates of bleeding (n = 10,11%) and bowel ischemia (n = 4,4%) compared to patients without SVT (n = 14,4% and n = 2,0.6%; OR 3.24; 95% CI 1.27-8.23 and OR 7.29; 95% CI 1.31-40.4, respectively), and were independently associated with ICU admission (adjusted OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.37-4.68). Spontaneous recanalization occurred in 62% of patients (n = 40/71). Radiological and clinical outcomes did not differ between patients treated with and without anticoagulants.

DISCUSSION

SVT is a common and early complication of necrotizing pancreatitis, associated with parenchymal necrosis and younger age. SVT is associated with increased complications and a worse clinical course, whereas anticoagulant use does not appear to affect outcomes.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of acute pancreatitis: a review of current practices and future directions

Acute pancreatitis is a condition marked by inflammation of the pancreas and surrounding tissues. While the majority of cases of acute pancreatitis are mild, a minority of severe cases are the primary contributors to the morbidity and mortality attributed to this condition. Retroperitoneal morphologic changes can be detected by utilization of various imaging modalities, and their accurate evaluation is crucial for effective management. Acute pancreatitis is commonly diagnosed using computed tomography (CT). However, there are certain clinical scenarios where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may have superiority over CT. In particular, MRI is useful in cases where patients cannot receive iodinated CT contrast, or where there is a need to investigate the underlying cause of acute pancreatitis. Additionally, MRI can be utilized to evaluate ductal disconnection and guide interventions for necrotic collections. The unique features of MRI can be particularly useful, including its ability to provide superior contrast resolution and to offer greater functional information through techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging. The aim of this review is to discuss the MRI assessment of individuals with acute pancreatitis. Additionally, the recent advances in MRI for evaluation of acute pancreatitis will also be introduced.

Therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with acute pancreatitis and splanchnic vein thrombosis: a best evidence topic

A best evidence topic in general surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The clinical question addressed was: in adult patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis, would administration of therapeutic anticoagulation be advisable considering the rates of vessel recanalization and bleeding complications? Four hundred twenty-four papers were found on Ovid Embase and Medline whilst 222 were found on PubMed using the reported literature search. From these, five articles represented the best evidence to the clinical question. The authors, publication dates, countries, patient groups, study outcomes, and results of these papers were tabulated. There were three systematic reviews with meta-analyses, one systematic review without meta-analysis and one randomized, retrospective study. The authors conclude that among patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis in the context of acute pancreatitis, therapeutic anticoagulation improved the rates of recanalization without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. However, there remains a need for randomized studies to address this clinical dilemma to further increase the quality of available evidence.

A narrative review of acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis: from pathogenesis to clinical management

Acute pancreatitis-induced splanchnic vein thrombosis (APISVT) is an important sequela complication of acute pancreatitis, which may cause poor prognosis, such as severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage, bowel ischemic necrosis and liver failure. However, its mechanism remains uncertain, and there is not a general consensus on the management. In this study, we reviewed the latest academic publications in APISVT, and discussed its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, adverse outcome and treatment, especially focused on the role of anticoagulant therapy. It was indicated that anticoagulation therapy can significantly elevate thrombus recanalization and reduce the incidence of complications and mortality with no increase of bleeding. Actually, as most of these studies were retrospective analyses and prospective studies included small samples, the conclusion remains controversial. Thus, well-designed randomized controlled trials are urged to verify the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy for APISVT.

Determinants and impact of splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a well-recognised though little-studied complication in acute pancreatitis (AP). SVT risk factors, its clinical consequences and the role of anticoagulation (AC) therapy is scarce.

AIMS

To evaluate the incidence and natural history of SVT in AP.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study involving 23 hospitals in Spain. AP complications were identified by computer tomography, and patients with SVT were re-evaluated after two years.

RESULTS

A total of 1655 patients with AP were included. The overall incidence of SVT was 3.6%. SVT was significantly associated with male gender, younger age and alcoholic aetiology. Every local complication increased SVT incidence, and this risk rose gradually with larger extension and infection of necrosis. These patients had a longer hospital stay and underwent a greater number of invasive treatments, regardless of AP severity. Forty-six patients with SVT were followed up. SVT resolution rate was 54.5% in the AC group and 30.8% in the non-AC group with lower thrombotic complications in the SVT resolution group (83.3% vs 22.7%; p<0.001). No AC-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies the risk factors and negative clinical impact of SVT in AP. Our results justify future trials to demonstrate the role of AC in this clinical scenario.

Predictive value of D-dimer and fibrinogen degradation product for splanchnic vein thrombosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Early diagnosis of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) after severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remains difficult because of its insidious onset. Common serum markers for thrombosis such as D-dimer (D-D) have lost their diagnostic value due to their elevation in non-thrombotic patients with SAP. The aim of this study is to predict SVT after SAP using common serum indicators of thrombosis by establishing a new cut-off value.

METHODS

177 SAP patients were included in a retrospective cohort study from September 2019 to September 2021. Patient demographics, dynamic changes of coagulation and fibrinolysis indicators were collected. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were applied to assess potential risk factors for the development of SVT in SAP patients. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to assess the predictive value of independent risk factors. Moreover, clinical complications and outcomes were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Among 177 SAP patients, 32 (18.1%) developed SVT. The most common cause of SAP was biliary (49.8%), followed by hypertriglyceridemia (21.5%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that D-D (OR, 1.135; 95%CI, 1.043-1.236; p = 0.003) and fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) (OR, 1.037; 95%CI, 1.015-1.060; p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for SVT development in patients with SAP. The area under ROC curve for D-D was 0.891 (p = 0.003, sensitivity= 95.3%, specificity = 74.1%) at a cut-off value of 6.475, and the area under ROC curve for FDP was 0.858 (p = 0.001, sensitivity = 89.4%, specificity = 72.4%) at a cut-off value of 23.155.

CONCLUSION

D-D and FDP are significant independent risk factors with high predictive value for SVT in patients with SAP.

Therapeutic anticoagulation for splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: A national survey and case-vignette study

BACKGROUND

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a major complication of moderate and severe acute pancreatitis. There is no consensus on whether therapeutic anticoagulation should be started in patients with acute pancreatitis and SVT.

AIM

To gain insight into current opinions and clinical decision making of pancreatologists regarding SVT in acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

A total of 139 pancreatologists of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group and Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group were approached to complete an online survey and case vignette survey. The threshold to assume group agreement was set at 75%.

RESULTS

The response rate was 67% (n = 93). Seventy-one pancreatologists (77%) regularly prescribed therapeutic anticoagulation in case of SVT, and 12 pancreatologists (13%) for narrowing of splanchnic vein lumen. The most common reason to treat SVT was to avoid complications (87%). Acute thrombosis was the most important factor to prescribe therapeutic anticoagulation (90%). Portal vein thrombosis was chosen as the most preferred location to initiate therapeutic anticoagulation (76%) and splenic vein thrombosis as the least preferred location (86%). The preferred initial agent was low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; 87%). In the case vignettes, therapeutic anticoagulation was prescribed for acute portal vein thrombosis, with or without suspected infected necrosis (82% and 90%), and thrombus progression (88%). Agreement was lacking regarding the selection and duration of long-term anticoagulation, the indication for thrombophilia testing and upper endoscopy, and about whether risk of bleeding is a major barrier for therapeutic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

In this national survey, the pancreatologists seemed to agree on the use of therapeutic anticoagulation, using LMWH in the acute phase, for acute portal thrombosis and in the case of thrombus progression, irrespective of the presence of infected necrosis.

Acute pancreatitis induces a transient hypercoagulable state in murine models

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Although understudied, risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) appears to be increased during acute pancreatitis (AP). We aimed to further characterize a hypercoagulable state associated with AP utilizing thromboelastography (TEG), a readily available, point of care test.

METHODS

AP was induced in C57/Bl6 mice using l-arginine and caerulein. TEG was performed with citrated native samples. The maximum amplitude (MA) and coagulation index (CI), a composite marker of coagulability, were evaluated. Platelet aggregation was assessed using whole blood collagen-activated platelet impedance aggregometry. Circulating tissue factor (TF), the initiator of extrinsic coagulation, was measured with ELISA. A VTE model using IVC ligation followed by measurement of clot size and weight was evaluated. After IRB approval and consent, blood samples from patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of AP were evaluated by TEG.

RESULTS

Mice with AP displayed a significant increase in MA and CI, consistent with hypercoagulability. Hypercoagulability peaked at 24 h after induction of pancreatitis, then returned to baseline by 72 h. AP resulted in significantly increased platelet aggregation and elevated circulating TF. Increased clot formation with AP was observed in an in vivo model of deep vein thrombosis. In a proof of concept, correlative study, over two thirds of patients with AP demonstrated an elevated MA and CI compared to the normal range, consistent with hypercoagulability.

CONCLUSIONS

Murine acute pancreatitis results in a transient hypercoagulable state that can be assessed by TEG. Correlative evidence for hypercoagulability was also demonstrated in human pancreatitis. Further study to correlate coagulation measures to incidence of VTE in AP is warranted.

Establishment and verification a nomogram for predicting portal vein thrombosis presence among admitted cirrhotic patients

Background

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an increasingly recognized complication of cirrhosis and possibly associated with mortality. This study aims to evaluate provoking factors for PVT, then establish a concise and efficient nomogram for predicting PVT presence among admitted cirrhotic patients.

Materials and methods

All cirrhotic patients admitted in Hunan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2010 and September 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, the clinical and laboratory data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression method were used for screening the independent predictors and constructing the nomogram. The calibration curve was plotted to evaluate the consistent degree between observed outcomes and predicted probabilities. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was used to assess the discriminant performance. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was carried out to evaluate the benefits of nomogram.

Results

A total of 4,479 patients with cirrhosis were enrolled and 281 patients were identified with PVT. Smoking history, splenomegaly, esophagogastric varices, surgical history, red blood cell transfusion, and D-dimer were independent risk factors for PVT in cirrhosis. A nomogram was established with a good discrimination capacity and predictive efficiency with an the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.664-0.745) in the training set and 0.685 (95% CI: 0.615-0.754) in the validation set. DCA suggested the net benefit of nomogram had a superior risk threshold probability.

Conclusion

A concise and efficient nomogram was established with good performance, which may aid clinical decision making and guide best treatment measures.

Vascular complications of pancreatitis

More than 200000 hospital admissions happen per year for acute pancreatitis and more than 50000 for chronic pancreatitis in the United States of America. Necrotizing pancreatitis accounts for 20%-30% of the cases. One-quarter of the patients with pancreatitis develop vascular complications, which carries a high mortality. This mini-review will address these complications that can help primary care physicians and hospitalists in managing their patients effectively.