Multi-ethnic minority nurses' knowledge and practice of genetics and genomics

Global Health and Genomics

Evidence based genomic applications improve the quality and safety of healthcare. Nurses, irrespective of their role, level of training, or clinical specialty, need to achieve genomic competency as defined internationally. This includes nursing educators who teach nurses in training as well as nursing leadership who guide policy and support infrastructure. Genomic resources are abundant to help achieve competency which in turn improves quality, safety, and outcomes of nursing care.

Incorporating Omics Nursing Literacy Into Nursing Education and Continuing Nursing Education in the Era of Precision Health

BACKGROUND

Precision health, following traditional and evidence-based medicine, marks the third revolution in medical history. Incorporating omics nursing into both education and clinical practice is important. For RNs and students, information about omics and the associated technologies remains challenging but is crucial for integrating precision health into clinical practice.

METHOD

To provide a theoretical basis for advancing nursing continuing education in omics and precision nursing in clinical settings, this review examines the origins, clinical application, and advancement status of omics education.

RESULTS

Omics nursing education is interprofessional in nature and is growing rapidly; however, this review highlights educational gaps such as poor integration and practical disconnect.

CONCLUSION

To overcome these issues, governments, hospitals, and universities should use interprofessional collaboration, advanced technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence, and policy benefits to offer multilevel omics nursing education for clinical nurses and students, which is crucial for advancing precision nursing in clinical settings. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2025;56(4):139-145.].

Factors affecting nurses' genetic nursing competency: A systematic review

AIM

This study systematically analyzes key factors influencing nurses' genetic nursing competency to inform future genetic nursing education, research and practical interventions.

BACKGROUND

The advancements in genomic technology, genetic nursing has emerged as a critical component of personalized and precision medicine. However, existing research suggests that many nurses lack adequate preparation to address genetic nursing competency effectively.

DESIGN

This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024577323) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol.

METHOD

This systematic review retrieved quantitative studies published between January 2009 and June 2024 from seven databases. The inclusion process involved initial screening, full-text assessment for inclusion criteria and methodological assessment. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and quality assessment using Zotero software, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or consultation with a third researcher. Thirteen studies included, encompassing 6816 registered nurses from multiple countries. The Joanna Briggs Institute risk of bias criteria was used for quality assessment and traditional content analysis was used to summarize quantitative findings.

RESULTS

Thirteen factors influencing genetic nursing competency were identified across three levels: individual (education, gender, work experience, basic knowledge, professional attitude, clinical skills, self-confidence, genetic awareness), environmental (unit differences, cultural and ethical cognition) and organizational (professional roles, professional development, leadership support).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study highlights individual, environmental and organizational factors affecting nurses' genetic nursing competencies. It emphasizes the need for targeted training, leadership support, policy development and international collaboration to achieve these competencies globally.

The effect of WhatsApp-based training on nurses' genetic knowledge levels and awareness in Turkey: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Genetics plays an important role in healthcare, and it is crucial for nurses to have a good understanding of this field. However, studies have shown that nurses often lack genetic knowledge and awareness. Furthermore, innovative educational approaches, such as WhatsApp-based education, have been proposed to address this knowledge gap, unlike traditional educational methods. These approaches use technology and interactive platforms to engage nurses in dynamic and immersive learning experiences.

AIM

This study aimed to examine the impact of WhatsApp-based training on nurses' genetic knowledge levels and awareness.

METHOD

A quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design was used. A total of 121 registered nurses participated in a WhatsApp-based training program comprising presentations on genetic issues. Data were collected using Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey. Values, means, percentage frequency distributions, and paired-sample t-tests were used.

RESULTS

In the pre-training period, the mean knowledge score of the nurse group was found to be 3.31 ± 1.30 in the pre-training period and 9.58 ± 1.73 in the post-training period. The applied WhatsApp-based training was found to have an effect size of 0.752 on the GGNPS (Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey) knowledge score of the sample group (F = 374.882, p = 0.000). In the post-training period, there were significant increases in all the GGNPS items.

CONCLUSION

WhatsApp-based educational programs have the potential to improve nurses' genetic knowledge and awareness. To fulfill the expanding needs of the nursing profession and to enhance patient care outcomes, this study emphasizes the importance of incorporating innovative educational tools into nursing education.

Impact of a Professional Development Course for Doctoral Nurses and Students on Genomic Conceptual Knowledge and Competencies

BACKGROUND

Universally, nurses' limited educational opportunities to expand their genomic literacy may have implications on patient care management, research, and training.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a self-paced online course on genomic knowledge and competency acquisition in a sample of nurses possessing a doctoral degree and doctoral students.

METHODS

Pre- and postcourse data were collected using the "Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory" (GNCI) (N = 129) and a self-report survey based on the Essential Genetic and Genomic Competencies for Nurses with Graduate Degrees (N = 131).

RESULTS

GNCI scores in all 4 topical categories and in 9 of the 16 domains significantly improved. All Genetic Competency scores significantly improved. Significant correlations were observed between Genetic Competency self-ratings and GNCI scores precourse and change of scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive outcomes should encourage the development of more accessible educational opportunities for nurses and other healthcare professionals to improve genomic literacy and competency.

Nursing strategies to address health disparities in genomics-informed care: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to map the available global evidence on strategies that nurses can use to facilitate genomics-informed health care to address health disparities to inform the development of a research and action agenda.

INTRODUCTION

The integration of genomics into health care is improving patient outcomes through better prevention, diagnostics, and treatment; however, scholars have noted concerns with widening health disparities. Nurses work across the health system and can address health disparities from a clinical, research, education, policy, and leadership perspective. To do this, a comprehensive understanding of existing genomics-informed strategies is required.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Published (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods studies; systematic and literature reviews; and text and opinion papers) and unpublished (gray) literature that focused on genomics-informed nursing strategies to address health disparities over the past 10 years were included. No limitations were placed on language.

METHODS

The review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search was undertaken on May 25, 2023, across 5 databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). Gray literature was searched through websites, including the International Society of Nurses in Genetics and the Global Genomics Nursing Alliance. Abstracts, titles, and full texts were screened by 2 or more independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a data extraction tool. The coded data were analyzed by 2 or more independent reviewers using conventional content analysis, and the summarized results are presented using descriptive statistics and evidence tables.

RESULTS

In total, we screened 818 records and 31 were included in the review. The most common years of publication were 2019 (n=5, 16%), 2020 (n=5, 16%), and 2021 (n=5, 16%). Most papers came from the United States (n=25, 81%) followed by the Netherlands (n=3, 10%), United Kingdom (n=1, 3%), Tanzania (n=1, 3%), and written from a global perspective (n=1, 3%). Nearly half the papers discussed cancer-related conditions (n=14, 45%) and most of the others did not specify a disease or condition (n=12, 39%). In terms of population, nurse clinicians were mentioned the most frequently (n=16, 52%) followed by nurse researchers, scholars, or scientists (n=8, 26%). The patient population varied, with African American patients or communities (n=7, 23%) and racial or ethnic minorities (n=6, 19%) discussed most frequently. The majority of equity issues focused on inequitable access to genetic and genomics health services among ethnic and racial groups (n=14, 45%), individuals with lower educational attainment or health literacy (n=6, 19%), individuals with lower socioeconomic status (n=3, 10%), migrants (n=3, 10%), individuals with lack of insurance coverage (n=2, 6%), individuals living in rural or remote areas (n=1, 3%), and individuals of older age (n=1, 3%). Root causes contributing to health disparity issues varied at the patient, provider, and system levels. Strategies were grouped into 2 categories: those to prepare the nursing workforce and those nurses can implement in practice. We further categorized the strategies by domains of practice, including clinical practice, education, research, policy advocacy, and leadership. Papers that mentioned strategies focused on preparing the nursing workforce were largely related to the education domain (n=16, 52%), while papers that mentioned strategies that nurses can implement were mostly related to clinical practice (n=19, 61%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses in all domains of practice can draw on the identified strategies to address health disparities related to genomics in health care. We found a notable lack of intervention and evaluation studies exploring the impact on health and equity outcomes. Additional research informed by implementation science that measures health outcomes is needed to identify best practices.

SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT

A French-language version of the abstract of this review is available: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A65 .

Predictors and outcomes of genomic knowledge among nurses in a middle eastern country: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Genomics has received significant attention in recent years. Nurses can uniquely contribute to the field of genomics and improve genomic healthcare. However, they lack the necessary knowledge to accomplish this, impacting their confidence, willingness, and ability to implement genomics healthcare negatively. Given Oman's unique healthcare context, its prospective genomics application, and the global trend toward genomic competency, it is essential to gauge nurses' genomic knowledge as basis for equipping them.

AIM

This study assessed the genomic knowledge among nurses in the Sultanate of Oman. It also explored the predictors and outcomes of their genomic knowledge.

DESIGN

This study used a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design.

SETTINGS

Nurses from four public hospitals in Muscat Governorate, Sultanate of Oman were recruited to participate in the study.

METHODS

A total of 661 out of 700 nurses responded to the pen and paper self-report questionnaire (94 % response rate). Univariate, bivariate, and regression analyses were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Consistent with international studies, nurses in Oman had low to moderate genomic knowledge. Years of experience in genetics healthcare and working in either the surgical and maternity units were positively associated with higher genomic knowledge. Working in the bone marrow transplant unit and having a family history of consanguinity were associated with poorer genomic knowledge. Higher genomic knowledge was associated with an increased willingness to care for patients with genetic issues, higher confidence in providing genomic healthcare, and a lower intention to pursue continuing education on genomics.

CONCLUSION

Strategies targeting variables, particularly those that are amenable to interventions, should be developed and implemented to foster genomic knowledge in nurses.

Current State of Genomics in Nursing: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Provider Oriented (Clinical and Educational) Outcomes (2012-2022)

In the 20 years since the initial sequencing of the human genome, genomics has become increasingly relevant to nursing. We sought to chart the current state of genomics in nursing by conducting a systematic scoping review of the literature in four databases (2012-2022). The included articles were categorized according to the Cochrane Collaboration outcome domains/sub-domains, and thematic analysis was employed to identify key topical areas to summarize the state of the science. Of 8532 retrieved articles, we identified 232 eligible articles. The articles primarily reported descriptive studies from the United States and other high-income countries (191/232, 82%). More than half (126/232, 54.3%) aligned with the "healthcare provider oriented outcomes" outcome domain. Three times as many articles related to the "knowledge and understanding" sub-domain compared to the "consultation process" subdomain (96 vs. 30). Five key areas of focus were identified, including "nursing practice" (50/126, 40%), "genetic counseling and screening" (29/126, 23%), "specialist nursing" (21/126, 17%), "nurse preparatory education" (17/126, 13%), and "pharmacogenomics" (9/126, 7%). Only 42/126 (33%) articles reported interventional studies. To further integrate genomics into nursing, study findings indicate there is a need to move beyond descriptive work on knowledge and understanding to focus on interventional studies and implementation of genomics into nursing practice.

Genetics and genomics knowledge and competency of Chinese nurses based on the theory of diffusion of innovation: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Background

Nurses are responsible for providing genetics and genomics health care services, including disease risk assessment, medical referrals, and advocating for communities and individuals who probably benefit from genomics and genetics services.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate Chinese nurses' understanding and previous training in genomics and genetics. Additionally, we aimed to understand the degree to which Chinese nurses use genomics and genetics knowledge in their daily practice and to assess the learning needs regarding genomics and genetics.

Method

This study utilized the design of a descriptive cross-sectional study. From January 18 to March 15, 2022, 406 registered nurses from the Shandong province of China working in clinical institutions and with good English proficiency were recruited as study subjects. Nurses' demographic data and data related to genetic knowledge and competency were collected using the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) questionnaire. Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests were utilized to investigate the descriptive statistics and non-normally distributed data.

Results

There are 406 nurses from Shandong Province, China participated in the study. Among them, BSN degrees accounted for 83.7%. Female nurses accounted for 96.8%, and 40% are clinical nurses. Among such nurses, 65.5% reported that genetics was involved in their nursing courses, and 56.2% planned to study more knowledge associated with genetics. The mean knowledge score was 7.35 (out of 12). Nurses' gender, primary role, genomics education, and experience caring for patients with common diseases influenced nurses' scores on genetic and genomics knowledge.

Conclusion

The genomics knowledge and competency of Chinese nurses need to be further improved. Incorporating genomics into the standard nursing curriculum can effectively reduce the knowledge gap. Simultaneously, it is also necessary to improve the attention of senior nurses and nursing managers to genomics nursing and improve the clinical practice environment.

A Scoping Review: Do instruments measuring genomic competence in nursing incorporate ethics?

AIM

To explore the instruments used in measuring genomic competence in nursing. The objective was to understand how ethical issues are reflected in the instruments.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

METHODS

A systematically conducted scoping review was conducted by using CINAHL Complete and Medline databases covering the years from January 2010 to January 2022. Two authors inspected potentially eligible papers and assessed their quality independently using the critical appraisal tools of Joanna Briggs Institute. Twenty-five articles were eligible including 19 different instruments. Included articles answered the research question: "How ethical issues are reflected in instruments measuring genomic competence in nursing?" The inductive thematic analysis was used in this review.

RESULTS

Descriptions of ethical themes were unstructured in the scoped articles and instruments. Not all genomic competence instruments covered ethical aspects. Only three studies asked direct questions by using the word ethics or its derivates, including confidentiality in solving ethical problems, familiarity with the ethical aspects of genetic counselling and ability to identify ethical issues. Thirteen articles included ethics-related themes encompassing knowledge, skills, concerns, advantages and disadvantages.

Genetic/genomic literacy, attitudes and receptivity of nursing students and practising nurses: A cross-sectional online survey

BACKGROUND

The growing demand for personalised nursing care in the genomic era requires nursing students and practising nurses to be better prepared to apply the knowledge of genetics/genomics to nursing practice. Several studies have shown that, despite having positive attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice, nursing students and professionals report a low level of genetic/genomic literacy. However, little is known about the status in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed and compared the genetic/genomic literacy and attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice among nursing students and practising nurses in Hong Kong. We also explored the relationships between the students' background characteristics, attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice and genetic/genomic literacy.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional online survey conducted between March 2020 and January 2022.

SETTINGS

A government-funded university in Hong Kong.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited a convenience sample of 234 nursing students, 145 were final-year undergraduate students (median age = 22 years, 84.1 % female) and 89 were practising registered nurses (postgraduate students studying part-time programme, median age = 28 years, 77.5 % female).

METHODS

The survey collected the participants' background information, attitudes/receptivity towards integrating genetics/genomics into nursing practice and levels of genetic/genomic literacy.

RESULTS

Overall, the participants reported positive attitudes/receptivity towards practice integration but had low levels of genetic/genomic literacy. Practising nurses were more likely to have lower genetic/genomic literacy, but more positive attitudes/receptivity towards practice integration, than undergraduate students. Multiple regression analysis suggested that the level of study (postgraduate/undergraduate programme) and perceptions of the disadvantages of 'needing to re-tool professionally' were significant independent factors associated with the level of genetic/genomic literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study call for the strategic integration of genetics/genomics education into all levels of nursing education in Hong Kong and across the globe. In particular, sustained efforts should be made to ensure that practising nurses receive further education in genetics/genomics.

Genetics and genomic competency of Turkish nurses: A descriptive cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Nurses have essential roles in genetic related healthcare, including risk assessment, referring individuals to genetics services, advocating for and educating individual, families, and communities who might benefit from genetic services.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the genetics and genomic competency of Turkish nurses.

DESIGN

A descriptive cross sectional research design was used to collect data.

SETTING

Totally 385 nurses working in clinical or academic settings in Turkey were recruited between 20 January and 20 April 2020.

METHODS

Data were collected using socio-demographic characteristics form and Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey on 20 January-20 April 2020. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for data analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 385 nurses participated in this study. Most, 44.9% had a BSN degree, 42.1% were clinical nurses. Of the nurses, 34.5% reported that they had genetics included in their nursing curriculum, and 74.0% intended to learn more about genetics. The mean knowledge score was 9.36/12. Gender, primary role of nurses, and whether to see patients actively in practice were the factors effecting knowledge score of nurses in genetic and genomics.

CONCLUSIONS

Turkish nurses' genomics skills need additional development and integration of genomics to the nursing curriculum can be effective to decrease their knowledge gaps. Clinical nurses' genomic competency should improve to increase the nursing care quality.

Integrating Genomic Professional Skills Into Nursing Practice: Results From a Large Cohort of Israeli Nurses

PURPOSE

To explore the association of genomic knowledge, self-epistemic authority (SEA; i.e., subjective perception of knowledge expertise), perceived importance of genomics in nursing, and the integration of genomic skills into nursing practice.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of nurses working in pediatric, obstetric, and internal wards of two medical centers in Israel between February and October 2018.

METHODS

Participants completed anonymous questionnaires about genomic knowledge, SEA, perceived importance of genomics, and the performance of genomic skills in nursing practice. Associations between variables were analyzed using Pearson correlations, and a hierarchical regression model was used to determine which variables explained the performance of genomic practices among participants.

FINDINGS

Altogether 423 nurses participated in the study. The mean genomic knowledge was low (55.05 ± 14.82%). Nurses reported a low integration of genomic skills in their practice (M = 1.90, SD = 0.71), although their overall perceived importance of genomics was positive (M = 2.88, SD = 0.68). Positive correlations were found between SEA and the integration of genomic skills in nursing practice. Obstetric nurses had more genomic knowledge, more positive perceptions about genomics, and performed more genomic skills in their nursing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nurses realized the importance of genomics to their practice, and genomics is part of the Israeli nursing core curriculum, we found disappointingly low levels of knowledge and performance of genomic skills in nursing practice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results call for action to establish ongoing education programs in genomics for nurses, which would lead to the inclusion of genomic skills into routine nursing practice, and prepare nurses for providing personalized medicine.

Current status and future directions of U.S. genomic nursing health care policy

BACKGROUND

As genomic science moves beyond government-academic collaborations into routine healthcare operations, nursing's holistic philosophy and evidence-based practice approach positions nurses as leaders to advance genomics and precision health care in routine patient care.

PURPOSE

To examine the status of and identify gaps for U.S. genomic nursing health care policy and precision health clinical practice implementation.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review and policy priorities analysis to clarify key genomic policy concepts and definitions, and to examine trends and utilization of health care quality benchmarking used in precision health.

FINDINGS

Genomic nursing health care policy is an emerging area. Educating and training the nursing workforce to achieve full dissemination and integration of precision health into clinical practice remains an ongoing challenge. Use of health care quality measurement principles and federal benchmarking performance evaluation criteria for precision health implementation are not developed.

DISCUSSION

Nine recommendations were formed with calls to action across nursing practice workforce and education, nursing research, and health care policy arenas.

CONCLUSIONS

To advance genomic nursing health care policy, it is imperative to develop genomic performance measurement tools for clinicians, purchasers, regulators and policymakers and to adequately prepare the nursing workforce.

Population Whole Exome Screening: Primary Care Provider Attitudes About Preparedness, Information Avoidance, and Nudging

Compared to clinicians previously surveyed, primary care providers employed in a health system known for clinical genomics were more likely to have ordered or referred a patient for genetic testing, but had only modestly more genetics training and reported similarly low levels of comfort answering patient questions about genetic risk. Most supported population genomic screening, reported willingness to get screened themselves, and judged a hypothetical patient's decision to be screened favorably relative to a similar patient's decision to decline screening. Stakeholder perceptions of the ethical appropriateness of nudging at-risk patients to discuss testing with counselors were mixed.

Precision health research and implementation reviewed through the conNECT framework

BACKGROUND

Precision health is a population-based approach that incorporates big-data strategies to understand the complex interactions between biological, environmental, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors that influence health.

PURPOSE

A promising tool to facilitate precision health research and its dissemination is the ConNECT Framework.

METHODS

Here, we discuss the relationship of the five broad and synergistic principles within the ConNECT Framework as they may apply to nursing science research: (1) Integrating Context, (2) Fostering a Norm of Inclusion, (3) Ensuring Equitable Diffusion of Innovations, (4) Harnessing Communication Technology, and (5) Prioritizing Specialized Training.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The principles within this framework can be used by nurse scientists and educators to guide and disseminate precision health research.

Knowledge development, technology and questions of nursing ethics

This article explores emerging ethical questions that result from knowledge development in a complex, technological age. Nursing practice is at a critical ideological and ethical precipice where decision-making is enhanced and burdened by new ways of knowing that include artificial intelligence, algorithms, Big Data, genetics and genomics, neuroscience, and technological innovation. On the positive side is the new understanding provided by large data sets; the quick and efficient reduction of data into useable pieces; the replacement of redundant human tasks by machines, error reduction, pattern recognition, and so forth. However, these innovations require skepticism and critique from a profession whose mission is to care for and protect patients. The promise of technology and the new biological sciences to radically and positively transform healthcare may seem compelling when couched in terms of safety, efficiency, and effectiveness but their role in the provision of ethical nursing care remains uncertain. Given the profound moral and clinical implications of how today's knowledge is developed and utilized, it is time to reconsider the relationship between ethics and knowledge development in this new uncharted area.

Genomic Literacy of Registered Nurses and Midwives in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Survey

PURPOSE

Registered nurses and midwives require a degree of genomic literacy if they are to adequately communicate with other healthcare professionals and provide optimal care to patients, their families, and the community. Several studies have been conducted internationally to assess the genomic literacy of nurses; however, the genomic literacy of Australian registered nurses and midwives has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to measure the genomic literacy of Australian registered nurses and midwives through assessing participants' understandings of genomic concepts most critical to nursing and midwifery practice, as well as their perceived knowledge and attitude towards genomics in nursing and midwifery practice.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of Australian registered nurses and midwives using the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI^© ), a 31 multiple-choice question survey instrument. Participants were recruited via two key Australian nursing and midwifery organizations over an 8-month period in 2016.

METHODS

Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were used to calculate the total GNCI^© score and scores on individual subcategories, as well as relationships between demographic variables and GNCI^© scores.

FINDINGS

Most respondents worked as clinicians (71.4%) in a hospital or hospital-based setting (61.8%). Most registered nurses (80.5%) and midwives (97.2%) reported that genetics was relevant to clinical practice; however, over 80% of registered nurses and midwives believed their knowledge of genetics was poor or average. Genomic knowledge was assessed using the GNCI^© . Scores ranged from 3 to 29 (out of a possible 31), with a mean score of 13.3 (SD 4.559) based on 253 (N = 253) respondents, indicating that genomic literacy is low. There was a significant difference between genomic knowledge scores and education and training level (p = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

The genomic literacy of registered nurses and midwives in Australia is low. More must be done to ensure Australian registered nurses and midwives have an adequate level of genomic literacy to provide optimal care to patients, their families, and the community.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Modern medicine requires a healthcare workforce that is literate in genomics. Findings from this study may serve as the catalyst to improve the genomic literacy of the Australian nursing and midwifery workforce, allowing for improved health outcomes for individuals and the wider Australian public.

Genomics Education: Knowledge of Nurses Across the Profession and Integration Into Practice

BACKGROUND

Since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, the implications of genetics and genomics for health and illness have become clearer. All nurses, at all levels and across all specialties, must have a basic understanding of genetics and genomics to provide appropriate care. 
.

OBJECTIVES

This article provides an overview of the integration of genetics and genomics into nursing education, as well as continued barriers to nursing knowledge of genetics and genomics.
.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted using CINAHL®, PubMed, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Databases were reviewed for literature published from January 1962 to November 2017.
.

FINDINGS

Although genetic and genomic education has been integrated into undergraduate and graduate nursing curricula, a gap exists in this knowledge among student nurses, practicing nurses, and nursing faculty.

Nursing genetics and genomics: The International Society of Nurses in Genetics (ISONG) survey

BACKGROUND

The International Society of Nursing in Genetics (ISONG) fosters scientific and professional development in the discovery, interpretation, and application of genomic information in nursing research, education, and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

Assess genomic-related activities of ISONG members in research, education and practice, and competencies to serve as global leaders in genomics.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey (21-items) assessing genomic-related training, knowledge, and practice.

SETTINGS

An email invitation included a link to the anonymous online survey.

PARTICIPANTS

All ISONG members (n = 350 globally) were invited to partake.

METHODS

Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for between-group comparisons.

RESULTS

Respondents (n = 231, 66%), were mostly Caucasian, female, with a master's degree or higher. Approximately 70% wanted to incorporate genomics in research, teaching, and practice. More than half reported high genomic competency, and over 95% reported that genomics is relevant the next 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide a foundation for developing additional educational programs for an international nursing workforce in genomics.

Current practice for genetic counselling by nurses: An integrative review

AIM

To examine current practice of genetic counselling by nurses.

BACKGROUND

Recent debate argues that genetic counselling is a specialist advanced practice role, whilst others argue it is the role of all nurses. Current evidence is required to determine if genetic counselling could be included in all nurses' scope of practice.

DESIGN

Integrative literature review.

DATA SOURCES

A search of electronic databases (CINHAL, Medline, PubMed, Scopus), and reference lists published between January 2012 and March 2017, was undertaken.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies were critically appraised for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Data from each study were extracted and categorized according to their primary findings.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met in 10 studies. Main findings were identified: role of genetic counselling, current knowledge, need for further education, and client satisfaction with nurse genetic counsellors.

CONCLUSION

This paper concludes that some nurses do engage in genetic counselling, but how they engage is not consistent, nor is there consensus about what should be the scope of practice. Further investigation into credentialing, role recognition support and education for nurse genetic counselling are strongly recommended. As nurses are widely available, nurses can make a significant contribution to supporting those affected by genetic problems.

Hospital nursing leadership-led interventions increased genomic awareness and educational intent in Magnet settings

BACKGROUND

The Precision Medicine Initiative will accelerate genomic discoveries that improve health care, necessitating a genomic competent workforce.

PURPOSE

This study assessed leadership team (administrator/educator) year-long interventions to improve registered nurses' (RNs) capacity to integrate genomics into practice.

METHODS

We examined genomic competency outcomes in 8,150 RNs.

FINDINGS

Awareness and intention to learn more increased compared with controls. Findings suggest achieving genomic competency requires a longer intervention and support strategies such as infrastructure and policies. Leadership played a role in mobilizing staff, resources, and supporting infrastructure to sustain a large-scale competency effort on an institutional basis.

DISCUSSION

Results demonstrate genomic workforce competency can be attained with leadership support and sufficient time. Our study provides evidence of the critical role health-care leaders play in facilitating genomic integration into health care to improve patient outcomes. Genomics' impact on quality, safety, and cost indicate a leader-initiated national competency effort is achievable and warranted.

Expanding RN Scope of Knowledge-Genetics/Genomics: The New Frontier

Introducing a new competency into nursing practice requires the support of nursing leadership. A knowledge survey was used to assess nurses' knowledge following a yearlong genomics education initiative. Findings indicate that nurses benefit from repeated exposure to genetics-related content. Recommendations from this study include development and implementation of strategies that can be used to prepare nurses at all levels for the application of genetics and genomics. Clinical nurses with knowledge of genetics will be able to implement evidence-based interventions to manage acute and chronic illnesses. These nurses will then be able to engage patients more fully, thereby helping them to understand the relationship of genetics to healthy outcomes.

Self-reported race and ethnicity of US biobank participants compared to the US Census

Precision medicine envisions a future of effective diagnosis, treatment, and prevention grounded in precise understandings of the genetic and environmental determinants of disease. Given that the original genome-wide association studies represented a predominately European White population, and that diversity in genomic studies must account for genetic variation both within and across racial categories, new research studies are at a heightened risk for inadequate representation. Currently biological samples are being made available for sequencing in biobanks across the USA, but the diversity of those samples is unknown. The aims of this study were to describe the types of recruitment and enrollment materials used by US biobanks and the diversity of the samples contained within their collection. Biobank websites and brochures were evaluated for reading level, health literacy, and factors known to encourage the recruitment of minorities, such as showing pictures of diverse populations. Biobank managers were surveyed by mail on the methods and materials used for enrollment, recruitment, consent, and the self-reported race/ethnicity of biobank participants. From 51 US biobanks (68% response rate), recruitment and enrollment materials were in English only, and most of the websites and brochures exceeded a fifth-grade reading level. When compared to the 2015 US Census, self-reported race/ethnicity of participants was not significantly different for Whites (61%) and blacks (13%). The percentages were significantly lower for Hispanics and Latinos (18 vs. 7%, p = 0.00) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders (0.2 vs. 0.01%; p = 0.01) and higher for Asians (13 vs. 5%, p = 0.01). Materials for recruitment predominantly in English may limit participation by underrepresented populations.

Primer in Genetics and Genomics, Article 4—Inheritance Patterns

Since the completion of the Human Genome Project, much has been uncovered about inheritance of various illnesses and disorders. There are two main types of inheritance: Mendelian and non-Mendelian. Mendelian inheritance includes autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, X-linked, and Y-linked inheritance. Non-Mendelian inheritance includes mitochondrial and multifactorial inheritance. Nurses must understand the types of inheritance in order to identify red flags that may indicate the possibility of a hereditary disorder in a patient or family.

Genetics and Genomics in Oncology Nursing: What Does Every Nurse Need to Know?

In addition to the need for basic education about genetics/genomics, other approaches are suggested to include awareness campaigns, continuing education courses, policy review, and onsite clinical development. These alternative learning strategies encourage oncology nurses across the continuum of care, from the bedside/seatside to oncology nurse research, to integrate genomics into all levels of practice and research in the specialty of oncology nursing. All nurses are warriors in the fight against cancer. The goal of this article is to identify genomic information that oncology nurses, at all levels of care, need to know and use as tools in the war against cancer.

Nurses' Use of Race in Clinical Decision Making

PURPOSE

To examine nurses' self-reported use of race in clinical evaluation.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study analyzed data collected from three separate studies using the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey, which includes items about use of race and genomic information in nursing practice. The Racial Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE) scale was used to measure explicit clinical use of race among nurses from across the United States.

METHODS

Multivariate regression analysis was used to examine associations between RACE score and individual-level characteristics and beliefs in 5,733 registered nurses.

FINDINGS

Analysis revealed significant relationships between RACE score and nurses' race and ethnicity, educational level, and views on the clinical importance of patient demographic characteristics. Asian nurses reported RACE scores 1.41 points higher than White nurses (p < .001), and Black nurses reported RACE scores 0.55 points higher than White nurses (p < .05). Compared to diploma-level nurses, the baccalaureate-level nurses reported 0.69 points higher RACE scores (p < .05), master's-level nurses reported 1.63 points higher RACE scores (p < .001), and doctorate-level nurses reported 1.77 points higher RACE scores (p < .01). In terms of clinical importance of patient characteristics, patient race and ethnicity corresponded to a 0.54-point increase in RACE score (p < .001), patient genes to a 0.21-point increase in RACE score (p < .001), patient family history to a 0.15-point increase in RACE score (p < .01), and patient age to a 0.19-point increase in RACE score (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher reported use of race among minority nurses may be due, in part, to differential levels of racial self-awareness. A relatively linear positive relationship between level of nursing degree nursing education and use of race suggests that a stronger foundation of knowledge about genetic ancestry, population genetics and the concept "race" and genetic ancestry may increase in clinical decision making could allow nurses to more appropriately use of race in clinical care. Integrating patient demographic characteristics into clinical decisions is an important component of nursing practice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Registered nurses provide care for diverse racial and ethnic patient populations and stand on the front line of clinical care, making them essential for reducing racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare delivery. Exploring registered nurses' individual-level characteristics and clinical use of race may provide a more comprehensive understanding of specific training needs and inform nursing education and practice.

Increasing importance of genetics in nursing

OBJECTIVES

To examine the empirical literature related to the incorporation of genetic research and genetic competency needed by the nurse in practice.

DESIGN

Literature review.

DATA SOURCES

This article will explore published research within the past seven years of 2008-2015 that address the need for the increased incorporation of genetic content in nursing practice in addition to the need for the nurse to effectively screen the patient at risk of a genetic disorder. This literature review specifically focuses on the inadequacy of nurses in addressing genomic health compromise and serving as advocates for patients and families facing genetic disorders.

METHODS

A review of the literature published from 2008 to 2015 related to the incorporation of genetics in nursing practice and the role of the nurse as a patient advocate for families facing genetic disorders with resulting genomic health compromise.

RESULTS

The research exposes the lack of adequate preparation of nurses to incorporate and utilize the recent advances in genomic healthcare. Practicing nurses lack understating and skill in the application of genetics and genomic technologies to patient care. The nursing profession, including nursing academia, need to enhance the integration of genetic and genomic content into nursing curriculum and practice.

CONCLUSION

Practicing nurses are inadequately prepared to apply genetic advancements in screening at risk patients and addressing the needs of the patient or family facing a genomic health compromise.

Implementation science, genomic precision medicine, and improved health: A new path forward?

Implementation of genomic discoveries into health care optimally includes evaluation of outcomes for recipients of care, providers, payers, and health care systems. However, the influence of specific aspects of the implementation process on observed outcomes may be missed if assessment of implementation success is not built into the implementation design. The intersection of implementation science with genomics may provide new insights on how to maximize the benefits of emerging genomic technologies in health care. In this summary, members of the Roundtable on Genomics and Precision Health, formerly the Roundtable on Translating Genomic-Based Research for Health, of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the American Academy of Nursing explore challenges and opportunities for nurses to participate in implementing genomic discoveries into their practice informed by the principles of implementation science. Implementation requires collaboration across disciplines. Nurses can take leadership roles in engaging key stakeholders in health care organizations, assuring that communications regarding implementation are consistent with genomic literacy for each group of stakeholders, and planning for evaluation of data to assess how each component of the implementation process affected the overall outcome for health care.

Enfermería Genética y Genómica: una trilogía actual y del futuro

<p>La Genética y Genómica (GG) como área de investigación se identifica como un cuerpo de conocimiento emergentea lo largo y ancho del mundo,pues presenta un crecimiento exponencial  en la literatura científica, al alcanzar un incremento del 70% después del año 2006.Es,por tanto, un acontecimiento prioritario en las agendas de Enfermería y otras disciplinas de la Salud.  Se ha dicho  en la última década que la Genética y Genómicaes una experiencia nueva  para los clínicos y para los académicos  y  arrastra la integración deaspectos bio-clínicos, moleculares y de probabilidades para portadores y casos.</p>

Nurses' communication of pharmacogenetic test results as part of discharge care

As pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing is becoming integrated into routine clinical procedures for admitted hospital patients, consideration is needed as to when test results will be communicated to patients and by whom. Given the implications of PGx test results for current and future care, we propose that if results are not promptly discussed with patients when testing is completed, results should be discussed with patients during discharge care when possible, included in the printed or electronic discharge summary and a copy of the results sent to their primary provider. Nurses play an important role in discharge planning and care by providing patients with the necessary information and support to transfer from the hospital setting to an outpatient setting or to return to home and work. To promote nurses' ability to fulfill the role of communicating PGx test results, revised curricula and interprofessional and clinical decision support are needed.

Nurses' knowledge and educational needs regarding genetics

BACKGROUND

Nurses now require a basic knowledge of genetics to provide patient care in a range of settings.

OBJECTIVES

To determine Turkish registered nurses' current knowledge and educational needs in relation to genetics.

DESIGN

A descriptive, cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

Turkish registered nurses working in a university hospital in Turkey were recruited.

PARTICIPANTS

All registered nurses were invited to participate and 175 completed the study.

METHODS

The survey instrument, basic knowledge of health genetics, confidence in knowledge and the nurses' need for genetics education were used to collect data.

RESULTS

The majority (81.1%, n=142) of participants indicated that genetics was not taught during their degree program, although 53.1% to 96% of respondents felt confident in defining different genetic concepts. The average genetics knowledge score was 6.89±1.99 of a possible 11 (range 0-11). The majority (70.3%) expressed a strong wish to attend a continuing nursing education program in genetics.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that although Turkish nurses are not sufficiently knowledgeable to apply genetics in practice, they are willing to have more education to support their care of patients. Nurses need to have more education related to genetics in accordance with advances in human genetics to optimize health care.

Non-Biological (Fictive Kin and Othermothers): Embracing the Need for a Culturally Appropriate Pedigree Nomenclature in African-American Families

Although the Family Health History (FHH) is the most cost-effective tool in the staratification of disense risk, it is not designed to collect information from non-biological family members (NBFM). Significant NBFM, defined as "fictive kin and othermothers," tend to play a major role in the transmission of culture, health promotion, and decision-making; yet, their influence cannot be captured using the standard FHH. Participants attending the National Black Nurses Association (NBNA) 2012 genetic workshop were divided into groups to role-play FHH. All participants (N = 50) indicated difficulties with the standard FHH, ranking collection of sensitive data as the number 1 challenge. Consequently, a new symbol was developed with support from NBNA genetics workshop participants. Having such a symbol afforts an apportunity for inclusion of all NBFM to help guide risk-specific recommendations for disense management, prevention, and health promotion of common chronic diseases. This report will describe the process, presentation, and adoption of the symbol.

Filipino-American Nurses' Knowledge, Perceptions, Beliefs and Practice of Genetics and Genomics

INTRODUCTION

There is limited information on the knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and practice, about genetics and genomics among Filipino-American nurses. The National Coalition of Ethnic Minority Organizations (NCEMNA), in which the Philippine Nurses Association of America (PNAA) is a member organization, conducted an online survey to describe the genomic knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and practice of minority nurses. This study reports on responses from Filipino-American survey participants, which is a subset analysis of the larger NCEMNA survey.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore the knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, practice and genomic education of Filipino-American nurses.

METHOD

An online survey of 112 Filipino-American nurses was conducted to describe the knowledge, perceptions, beliefs, and practice of genetics/genomics. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Most (94%) Filipino-American nurses wanted to learn more about genetics. Although 41% of the respondents indicated good understanding of genetics of common diseases, 60% had not attended any related continuing education courses since RN licensure, and 73% reported unavailability of genetic courses to take. The majority (83%) of PNAA respondents indicated that they would attend genetics/genomics awareness training if it was offered by their national organization during their annual conference, and 86% reported that the national organization should have a visible role in genetics/genomics initiatives in their community.

CONCLUSION

Filipino-American nurses wanted to learn more about genetics and were willing to attend genetics/genomics trainings if offered by PNAA. The study findings can assist PNAA in planning future educational programs that incorporates genetics and genomics information.