1
|
Agarwal N, Fan A, Huang X, Dehkharghani S, van der Kolk A. ISMRM Clinical Focus Meeting 2023: "Imaging the Fire in the Brain". J Magn Reson Imaging 2025; 61:1580-1596. [PMID: 39193867 PMCID: PMC11896938 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 08/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Set during the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), the "Clinical Focus Meeting" (CFM) aims to bridge the gap between innovative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scientific research and daily patient care. This initiative is dedicated to maximizing the impact of MRI technology on healthcare outcomes for patients. At the 2023 Annual Meeting, clinicians and scientists from across the globe were invited to discuss neuroinflammation from various angles (entitled "Imaging the Fire in the Brain"). Topics ranged from fundamental mechanisms and biomarkers of neuroinflammation to the role of different contrast mechanisms, including both proton and non-proton techniques, in brain tumors, autoimmune disorders, and pediatric neuroinflammatory diseases. Discussions also delved into how systemic inflammation can trigger neuroinflammation and the role of the gut-brain axis in causing brain inflammation. Neuroinflammation arises from various external and internal factors and serves as a vital mechanism to mitigate tissue damage and provide neuroprotection. Nonetheless, excessive neuroinflammatory responses can lead to significant tissue injury and subsequent neurological impairments. Prolonged neuroinflammation can result in cellular apoptosis and neurodegeneration, posing severe consequences. MRI can be used to visualize these consequences, by detecting blood-brain barrier damage, characterizing brain lesions, quantifying edema, and identifying specific metabolites. It also facilitates monitoring of chronic changes in both the brain and spinal cord over time, potentially leading to better patient outcomes. This paper represents a summary of the 2023 CFM, and is intended to guide the enthusiastic MR user to several key and novel sequences that MRI offers to image pathophysiologic processes underlying acute and chronic neuroinflammation. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nivedita Agarwal
- Diagnostic Imaging and Neuroradiology UnitIRCCS Scientific Institute E. MedeaBosisio PariniLeccoItaly
| | - Audrey Fan
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of California Davis HealthSacramentoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of California DavisDavisCaliforniaUSA
| | - Xiaoqi Huang
- Department of Radiology and Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Seena Dehkharghani
- Department of RadiologyAlbert Einstein College of Medicine‐Montefiore HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toubasi AA, Cutter G, Gheen C, Vinarsky T, Yoon K, AshShareef S, Adapa P, Gruder O, Taylor S, Eaton JE, Xu J, Bagnato F. Improving the Assessment of Axonal Injury in Early Multiple Sclerosis. Acad Radiol 2025; 32:1002-1014. [PMID: 39277455 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/17/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Several quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods are available to measure tissue injury in multiple sclerosis (MS), but their pathological specificity remains limited. The multi-compartment diffusion imaging using the spherical mean technique (SMT) overcomes several technical limitations of the diffusion-weighted image signal, thus delivering metrics with increased pathological specificity. Given these premises, here we assess whether the SMT-derived apparent axonal volume (Vax) provides a better tissue classifier than the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived axial diffusivity (AD) in the white matter (WM) of MS brains. METHODS Forty-three treatment-naïve people with newly diagnosed MS, clinically isolated syndrome, or radiologically isolated syndrome and 18 healthy controls (HCs) underwent a 3.0 Tesla MRI inclusive of T1-weighted (T1-w) and T2-w fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, and multi-b shell diffusion-weighted imaging. In patients only, pre- and post-gadolinium diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid T1-w sequences were obtained for the evaluation of contrast-active lesions (CELs). Vax and AD were calculated in T2-lesions, chronic black holes (cBHs), and normal appearing (NAWM) in patients and normal WM (NWM) in HCs. Vax and AD values were compared across all the possible combinations of these regions. CELs were excluded from the analyses. RESULTS Vax differed in all comparisons (p ≤ 0.047 by paired t-test); AD differed in most comparisons (p < 0.001) except between NAWM and NWM, and between cBHs and T2-lesions. Vax had higher accuracy (p ≤ 0.029 by DeLong test) and larger effect size (p ≤ 0.038 by paired t-test) than AD in differentiating areas with even minimal tissue injury. CONCLUSIONS Vax provides a better radiological quantitative discriminator of different degrees of axonal-mediated tissue injury even between areas with expected minimal pathology. Our data support further studies to assess the readiness of Vax as a measure of outcome for clinical trials on neuroprotection in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad A Toubasi
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN (A.A.T., C.G., T.V., K.Y., S.A., P.A., F.B.)
| | - Gary Cutter
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (G.C.)
| | - Caroline Gheen
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN (A.A.T., C.G., T.V., K.Y., S.A., P.A., F.B.)
| | - Taegan Vinarsky
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN (A.A.T., C.G., T.V., K.Y., S.A., P.A., F.B.)
| | - Keejin Yoon
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN (A.A.T., C.G., T.V., K.Y., S.A., P.A., F.B.); University of Central Florida, College of Medicine, Orlando, FL (K.Y.)
| | - Salma AshShareef
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN (A.A.T., C.G., T.V., K.Y., S.A., P.A., F.B.); Department of Life and Physical Sciences, Fisk University, Nashville, TN (S.A.)
| | - Pragnya Adapa
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN (A.A.T., C.G., T.V., K.Y., S.A., P.A., F.B.); College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (P.A.)
| | - Olivia Gruder
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, VUMC, Nashville, TN (O.G., S.T., J.E.E.)
| | - Stephanie Taylor
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, VUMC, Nashville, TN (O.G., S.T., J.E.E.)
| | - James E Eaton
- Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, VUMC, Nashville, TN (O.G., S.T., J.E.E.); Cognitive Division, Department of Neurology, VUMC, Nashville, TN (J.E.E.)
| | - Junzhong Xu
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, VUMC, Nashville, TN (J.X.)
| | - Francesca Bagnato
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN (A.A.T., C.G., T.V., K.Y., S.A., P.A., F.B.); Department of Neurology, VA Medical Center, TN Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN (F.B.).
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dal-Bianco A, Oh J, Sati P, Absinta M. Chronic active lesions in multiple sclerosis: classification, terminology, and clinical significance. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2024; 17:17562864241306684. [PMID: 39711984 PMCID: PMC11660293 DOI: 10.1177/17562864241306684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024] Open
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis (MS), increasing disability is considered to occur due to persistent, chronic inflammation trapped within the central nervous system (CNS). This condition, known as smoldering neuroinflammation, is present across the clinical spectrum of MS and is currently understood to be relatively resistant to treatment with existing disease-modifying therapies. Chronic active white matter lesions represent a key component of smoldering neuroinflammation. Initially characterized in autopsy specimens, multiple approaches to visualize chronic active lesions (CALs) in vivo using advanced neuroimaging techniques and postprocessing methods are rapidly emerging. Among these in vivo imaging correlates of CALs, paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are defined by the presence of a perilesional rim formed by iron-laden microglia and macrophages, whereas slowly expanding lesions are identified based on linear, concentric lesion expansion over time. In recent years, several longitudinal studies have linked the occurrence of in vivo detected CALs to a more aggressive disease course. PRLs are highly specific to MS and therefore have recently been incorporated into the MS diagnostic criteria. They also have prognostic potential as biomarkers to identify patients at risk of early and severe disease progression. These developments could significantly affect MS care and the evaluation of new treatments. This review describes the latest knowledge on CAL biology and imaging and the relevance of CALs to the natural history of MS. In addition, we outline considerations for current and future in vivo biomarkers of CALs, emphasizing the need for validation, standardization, and automation in their assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assunta Dal-Bianco
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20, Vienna 1090, Austria
- Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pascal Sati
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martina Absinta
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Neuropathology Lab, Neuro Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coskun A, Ertaylan G, Pusparum M, Van Hoof R, Kaya ZZ, Khosravi A, Zarrabi A. Advancing personalized medicine: Integrating statistical algorithms with omics and nano-omics for enhanced diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2024; 1870:167339. [PMID: 38986819 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
Medical laboratory services enable precise measurement of thousands of biomolecules and have become an inseparable part of high-quality healthcare services, exerting a profound influence on global health outcomes. The integration of omics technologies into laboratory medicine has transformed healthcare, enabling personalized treatments and interventions based on individuals' distinct genetic and metabolic profiles. Interpreting laboratory data relies on reliable reference values. Presently, population-derived references are used for individuals, risking misinterpretation due to population heterogeneity, and leading to medical errors. Thus, personalized references are crucial for precise interpretation of individual laboratory results, and the interpretation of omics data should be based on individualized reference values. We reviewed recent advancements in personalized laboratory medicine, focusing on personalized omics, and discussed strategies for implementing personalized statistical approaches in omics technologies to improve global health and concluded that personalized statistical algorithms for interpretation of omics data have great potential to enhance global health. Finally, we demonstrated that the convergence of nanotechnology and omics sciences is transforming personalized laboratory medicine by providing unparalleled diagnostic precision and innovative therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdurrahman Coskun
- Acibadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Gökhan Ertaylan
- Unit Health, Environmental Intelligence, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol 2400, Belgium
| | - Murih Pusparum
- Unit Health, Environmental Intelligence, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol 2400, Belgium; I-Biostat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt 3500, Belgium
| | - Rebekka Van Hoof
- Unit Health, Environmental Intelligence, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol 2400, Belgium
| | - Zelal Zuhal Kaya
- Nisantasi University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Arezoo Khosravi
- Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul 34959, Turkey
| | - Ali Zarrabi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istinye University, Istanbul 34396, Turkey; Graduate School of Biotehnology and Bioengeneering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan; Department of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600 077, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Weijden CWJ, Pitombeira MS, Peretti DE, Campanholo KR, Kolinger GD, Rimkus CM, Buchpiguel CA, Dierckx RAJO, Renken RJ, Meilof JF, de Vries EFJ, de Paula Faria D. Unsupervised Pattern Analysis to Differentiate Multiple Sclerosis Phenotypes Using Principal Component Analysis on Various MRI Sequences. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5234. [PMID: 39274448 PMCID: PMC11396763 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) has two main phenotypes: relapse-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS), distinguished by disability profiles and treatment response. Differentiating them using conventional MRI is challenging. Objective: This study explores the use of scaled subprofile modelling using principal component analysis (SSM/PCA) on MRI data to distinguish between MS phenotypes. Methods: MRI scans were performed on patients with RRMS (n = 30) and patients with PMS (n = 20), using the standard sequences T1w, T2w, T2w-FLAIR, and the myelin-sensitive sequences magnetisation transfer (MT) ratio (MTR), quantitative MT (qMT), inhomogeneous MT ratio (ihMTR), and quantitative inhomogeneous MT (qihMT). Results: SSM/PCA analysis of qihMT images best differentiated PMS from RRMS, with the highest specificity (87%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (83%), but a lower sensitivity (67%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (72%). Conversely, T1w data analysis showed the highest sensitivity (93%) and NPV (89%), with a lower PPV (67%) and specificity (53%). Phenotype classification agreement between T1w and qihMT was observed in 57% of patients. In the subset with concordant classifications, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%, 88%, 90%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: SSM/PCA on MRI data revealed distinctive patterns for MS phenotypes. Optimal discrimination occurred with qihMT and T1w sequences, with qihMT identifying PMS and T1w identifying RRMS. When qihMT and T1w analyses align, MS phenotype prediction improves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris W J van der Weijden
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Milena S Pitombeira
- Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Oncology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, Brazil
| | - Débora E Peretti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kenia R Campanholo
- Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Oncology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, Brazil
| | - Guilherme D Kolinger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carolina M Rimkus
- Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Oncology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, Brazil
| | - Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel
- Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Oncology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, Brazil
| | - Rudi A J O Dierckx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Remco J Renken
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan F Meilof
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Martini Ziekenhuis, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik F J de Vries
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniele de Paula Faria
- Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Oncology, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Desu HL, Sawicka KM, Wuerch E, Kitchin V, Quandt JA. A rapid review of differences in cerebrospinal neurofilament light levels in clinical subtypes of progressive multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1382468. [PMID: 38654736 PMCID: PMC11035744 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1382468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is divided into three clinical phenotypes: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and primary progressive MS (PPMS). It is unknown to what extent SPMS and PPMS pathophysiology share inflammatory or neurodegenerative pathological processes. Cerebrospinal (CSF) neurofilament light (NfL) has been broadly studied in different MS phenotypes and is a candidate biomarker for comparing MS subtypes. Research question Are CSF NfL levels different among clinical subtypes of progressive MS? Methods A search strategy identifying original research investigating fluid neurodegenerative biomarkers in progressive forms of MS between 2010 and 2022 was applied to Medline. Identified articles underwent title and abstract screen and full text review against pre-specified criteria. Data abstraction was limited to studies that measured NfL levels in the CSF. Reported statistical comparisons of NfL levels between clinical phenotypes were abstracted qualitatively. Results 18 studies that focused on investigating direct comparisons of CSF NfL from people with MS were included in the final report. We found NfL levels were typically reported to be higher in relapsing and progressive MS compared to healthy controls. Notably, higher NfL levels were not clearly associated with progressive MS subtypes when compared to relapsing MS, and there was no observed difference in NfL levels between PPMS and SPMS in articles that separately assessed these phenotypes. Conclusion CSF NfL levels distinguish individuals with MS from healthy controls but do not differentiate MS subtypes. Broad biological phenotyping is needed to overcome limitations of current clinical phenotyping and improve biomarker translatability to decision-making in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haritha L. Desu
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Katherine M. Sawicka
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Wuerch
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Vanessa Kitchin
- University of British Columbia Library, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jacqueline A. Quandt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang J, Chen T, Xie J, Zhao S, Jiang Y, Zhang H, Zhu W. A bibliometric analysis of international publication trends in brain atrophy research (2008-2023). Front Neurol 2024; 15:1348778. [PMID: 38356880 PMCID: PMC10864491 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1348778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Brain atrophy is a type of neurological and psychiatric disorder characterized by a decrease in brain tissue volume and weight for various reasons and can have a serious impact on the quality of life of patients. Although there are many studies on brain atrophy, there is a lack of relevant bibliometric studies. Therefore, this study aims to provide a visual analysis of global trends in brain atrophy research over the past 16 years. Methods CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to visually analyze publication output, scientific collaborations, cocitations, publishing journals, and keywords to determine the current status and future trends of brain atrophy research. Materials published from 2008 to 2023 were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. This study placed no restrictions on the types of literature and focused on English language publications. Results A total of 3,371 publications were included in the analysis. From 2008 to 2023, the number of publications increased annually. In terms of national and academic institutions, universities in the United States and University College London rank first in publication out. Barkhof Frederik and Zivadinov Robert are the most prolific researchers in this field. The publication with the highest cocitation strength is "Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis." Keyword clustering analysis showed that "Alzheimer's disease" and "multiple sclerosis" are current popular topics. The analysis of emergent words indicates that "cerebral small vessel disease," "neurodegeneration," and "cortex/gray matter volume" may become hot research topics in the coming years. Conclusion This study analyses papers on brain atrophy from the past 16 years, providing a new perspective for research in this field. In the past 16 years, research on brain atrophy has received increasing attention. The quality of articles in this field is generally high. Extensive national cooperation already exists. The statistical results indicate that a stable core author group in the field of brain atrophy has almost formed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juwei Wang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Department of Graduate College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingting Chen
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Department of Graduate College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jiayi Xie
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Department of Graduate College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sheng Zhao
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Department of Graduate College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yue Jiang
- Department of Acupuncture, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Huihe Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Wenzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wenzhou, China
| | - Wenzong Zhu
- Department of Neurology, Wenzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Siger M, Wydra J, Wildner P, Podyma M, Puzio T, Matera K, Stasiołek M, Świderek-Matysiak M. Differences in Brain Atrophy Pattern between People with Multiple Sclerosis and Systemic Diseases with Central Nervous System Involvement Based on Two-Dimensional Linear Measures. J Clin Med 2024; 13:333. [PMID: 38256467 PMCID: PMC10816254 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in systemic diseases with central nervous system involvement (SDCNS) may imitate MRI findings of multiple sclerosis (MS). In order to better describe the MRI characteristics of these conditions, in our study we assessed brain volume parameters in MS (n = 58) and SDCNS (n = 41) patients using two-dimensional linear measurements (2DLMs): bicaudate ratio (BCR), corpus callosum index (CCI) and width of third ventricle (W3V). In SDCNS patients, all 2DLMs were affected by age (CCI p = 0.005, BCR p < 0.001, W3V p < 0.001, respectively), whereas in MS patients only BCR and W3V were (p = 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). Contrary to SDCNS, in the MS cohort BCR and W3V were associated with T1 lesion volume (T1LV) (p = 0.020, p = 0.009, respectively) and T2 lesion volume (T2LV) (p = 0.015, p = 0.009, respectively). CCI was associated with T1LV in the MS cohort only (p = 0.015). Moreover, BCR was significantly higher in the SDCNS group (p = 0.01) and CCI was significantly lower in MS patients (p = 0.01). The best predictive model to distinguish MS and SDCNS encompassed gender, BCR and T2LV as the explanatory variables (sensitivity 0.91; specificity 0.68; AUC 0.86). Implementation of 2DLMs in the brain MRI analysis of MS and SDCNS patients allowed for the identification of diverse patterns of local brain atrophy in these clinical conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata Siger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego Street 22, 90-414 Lodz, Poland; (M.S.); (P.W.); (M.Ś.-M.)
| | - Jacek Wydra
- Pixel Technology LLC, Piekna 1, 93-558 Lodz, Poland; (J.W.); (M.P.); (T.P.); (K.M.)
| | - Paula Wildner
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego Street 22, 90-414 Lodz, Poland; (M.S.); (P.W.); (M.Ś.-M.)
| | - Marek Podyma
- Pixel Technology LLC, Piekna 1, 93-558 Lodz, Poland; (J.W.); (M.P.); (T.P.); (K.M.)
| | - Tomasz Puzio
- Pixel Technology LLC, Piekna 1, 93-558 Lodz, Poland; (J.W.); (M.P.); (T.P.); (K.M.)
| | - Katarzyna Matera
- Pixel Technology LLC, Piekna 1, 93-558 Lodz, Poland; (J.W.); (M.P.); (T.P.); (K.M.)
| | - Mariusz Stasiołek
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego Street 22, 90-414 Lodz, Poland; (M.S.); (P.W.); (M.Ś.-M.)
| | - Mariola Świderek-Matysiak
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego Street 22, 90-414 Lodz, Poland; (M.S.); (P.W.); (M.Ś.-M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Newsome SD, Binns C, Kaunzner UW, Morgan S, Halper J. No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as a Clinical Assessment Tool for Multiple Sclerosis: Clinician and Patient Perspectives [Narrative Review]. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1909-1935. [PMID: 37819598 PMCID: PMC10630288 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00549-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The emergence of high-efficacy therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS), which target inflammation more effectively than traditional disease-modifying therapies, has led to a shift in MS management towards achieving the outcome assessment known as no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). The most common NEDA definition, termed NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of disease activity: no clinical relapses, no disability progression, and no radiological activity. NEDA has been frequently used as a composite endpoint in clinical trials, but there is growing interest in its use as an assessment tool to help patients and healthcare professionals navigate treatment decisions in the clinic. Raising awareness about NEDA may therefore help patients and clinicians make more informed decisions around MS management and improve overall MS care. This review aims to explore the potential utility of NEDA as a clinical decision-making tool and treatment target by summarizing the literature on its current use in the context of the expanding treatment landscape. We identify current challenges to the use of NEDA in clinical practice and detail the proposed amendments, such as the inclusion of alternative outcomes and biomarkers, to broaden the clinical information captured by NEDA. These themes are further illustrated with the real-life perspectives and experiences of our two patient authors with MS. This review is intended to be an educational resource to support discussions between clinicians and patients on this evolving approach to MS-specialized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D Newsome
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Pathology 627, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Cherie Binns
- Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, 6520 N Andrews Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33309, USA
| | | | - Seth Morgan
- National Multiple Sclerosis Society, 1 M Street SE, Suite 510, Washington, DC, 20003, USA
| | - June Halper
- Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, 3 University Plaza Drive Suite A, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johnson P, Vavasour IM, Stojkova BJ, Abel S, Lee LE, Laule C, Tam R, Li DKB, Ackermans N, Schabas AJ, Chan J, Cross H, Sayao AL, Devonshire V, Carruthers R, Traboulsee A, Kolind SH. Myelin heterogeneity for assessing normal appearing white matter myelin damage in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2023; 33:227-234. [PMID: 36443960 DOI: 10.1111/jon.13069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Conventional MRI measures of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease severity, such as lesion volume and brain atrophy, do not provide information about microstructural tissue changes, which may be driving physical and cognitive progression. Myelin damage in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) is likely an important contributor to MS disability. Myelin water fraction (MWF) provides quantitative measurements of myelin. Mean MWF reflects average myelin content, while MWF standard deviation (SD) describes variation in myelin within regions. The myelin heterogeneity index (MHI = SD/mean MWF) is a composite metric of myelin content and myelin variability. We investigated how mean MWF, SD, and MHI compare in differentiating MS from controls and their associations with physical and cognitive disability. METHODS Myelin water imaging data were acquired from 91 MS participants and 31 healthy controls (HC). Segmented whole-brain NAWM and corpus callosum (CC) NAWM, mean MWF, SD, and MHI were compared between groups. Associations of mean MWF, SD, and MHI with Expanded Disability Status Scale and Symbol Digit Modalities Test were assessed. RESULTS NAWM and CC MHI had the highest area under the curve: .78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .69, .86) and .84 (95% CI: .76, .91), respectively, distinguishing MS from HC. CONCLUSIONS Mean MWF, SD, and MHI provide complementary information when assessing regional and global NAWM abnormalities in MS and associations with clinical outcome measures. Examining all three metrics (mean MWF, SD, and MHI) enables a more detailed interpretation of results, depending on whether regions of interest include areas that are more heterogeneous, earlier in the demyelination process, or uniformly injured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poljanka Johnson
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Irene M Vavasour
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,International Collaboration on Repair and Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Shawna Abel
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lisa Eunyoung Lee
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cornelia Laule
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,International Collaboration on Repair and Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Roger Tam
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David K B Li
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nathalie Ackermans
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alice J Schabas
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jillian Chan
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Helen Cross
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ana-Luiza Sayao
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Virginia Devonshire
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert Carruthers
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anthony Traboulsee
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shannon H Kolind
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,International Collaboration on Repair and Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kuhlmann T, Moccia M, Coetzee T, Cohen JA, Correale J, Graves J, Marrie RA, Montalban X, Yong VW, Thompson AJ, Reich DS. Multiple sclerosis progression: time for a new mechanism-driven framework. Lancet Neurol 2023; 22:78-88. [PMID: 36410373 PMCID: PMC10463558 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00289-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 273] [Impact Index Per Article: 136.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Traditionally, multiple sclerosis has been categorised by distinct clinical descriptors-relapsing-remitting, secondary progressive, and primary progressive-for patient care, research, and regulatory approval of medications. Accumulating evidence suggests that the clinical course of multiple sclerosis is better considered as a continuum, with contributions from concurrent pathophysiological processes that vary across individuals and over time. The apparent evolution to a progressive course reflects a partial shift from predominantly localised acute injury to widespread inflammation and neurodegeneration, coupled with failure of compensatory mechanisms, such as neuroplasticity and remyelination. Ageing increases neural susceptibility to injury and decreases resilience. These observations encourage a new consideration of the course of multiple sclerosis as a spectrum defined by the relative contributions of overlapping pathological and reparative or compensatory processes. New understanding of key mechanisms underlying progression and measures to quantify progressive pathology will potentially have important and beneficial implications for clinical care, treatment targets, and regulatory decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Kuhlmann
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; Neuroimmunology Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Marcello Moccia
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Centre, Department of Neurosciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Timothy Coetzee
- National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA), New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Cohen
- Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jorge Correale
- Fleni, Department of Neurology, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Institute of Biological Chemistry and Biophysics (IQUIFIB), CONICET/UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jennifer Graves
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Ruth Ann Marrie
- Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia and Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Wee Yong
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alan J Thompson
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Buyukturkoglu K, Dworkin JD, Leiva V, Provenzano FA, Guevara P, De Jager PL, Leavitt VM, Riley CS. Brain volumetric correlates of remotely versus in-person administered symbol digit modalities test in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 68:104247. [PMID: 36274283 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies in multiple sclerosis (MS) support reliability of telehealth-delivered cognitive batteries, although, to date, none have reported relationships of cognitive test performance to neural correlates across administration modalities. In this study we aimed to compare brain-behavior relationships, using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), the most reliable and sensitive cognitive measure in MS, measured from patients seen via telehealth versus in-person. METHODS SDMT was administered to individuals with MS either in-person (N=60, mean age=39.7) or remotely via video conference (N=51, mean age=47.4). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was collected in 3-Tesla scanners. Using 3-dimensional T1 images cerebral, cortical, deep gray, cerebral white matter and thalamic nuclei volumes were calculated. Using a meta-analysis approach with an interaction term for participant group, individual regression models were run for each MRI measure having SDMT scores as the outcome variable in each model. In addition, the correlation and average difference between In-person and Remote group associations across the MRI measures were calculated. Finally, for each MRI variable I2 score was quantified to test the heterogeneity between the groups. RESULTS Administration modality did not affect the association of SDMT performance with MRI measures. Brain tissue volumes showing high associations with the SDMT scores in one group also showed high associations in the other (r = 0.83; 95% CI = [0.07, 0.86]). The average difference between the In-person and the Remote group associations was not significant (βRemote - βIn-person = 0.14, 95% CI = [-0.04, 0.34]). Across MRI measures, the average I2 value was 14%, reflecting very little heterogeneity in the relationship of SDMT performance to brain volume. CONCLUSION We found consistent relationships to neural correlates across in-person and remote SDMT administration modalities. Hence, our study extended the findings of the previous studies demonstrating the feasibility of remote administration of the SDMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korhan Buyukturkoglu
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, PH 18-324, New York, NY 10032, USA; The Center for Translational and Computational Neuroimmunology, NY, USA; Columbia University MS Center, NY, USA.
| | - Jordan D Dworkin
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, NY, USA
| | - Victor Leiva
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Santiago, Chile
| | - Frank A Provenzano
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, PH 18-324, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Pamela Guevara
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Santiago, Chile
| | - Philip L De Jager
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, PH 18-324, New York, NY 10032, USA; The Center for Translational and Computational Neuroimmunology, NY, USA; Columbia University MS Center, NY, USA
| | - Victoria M Leavitt
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, PH 18-324, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Claire S Riley
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W. 168th Street, PH 18-324, New York, NY 10032, USA; The Center for Translational and Computational Neuroimmunology, NY, USA; Columbia University MS Center, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Individual differences in visual evoked potential latency are associated with variance in brain tissue volume in people with multiple sclerosis: An analysis of brain function-structure correlates. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 68:104116. [PMID: 36041331 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Visual evoked potentials (VEP) index visual pathway functioning, and are often used for clinical assessment and as outcome measures in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). VEPs may also reflect broader neural disturbances that extend beyond the visual system, but this possibility requires further investigation. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that delayed latency of the P100 component of the VEP would be associated with broader structural changes in the brain in PwMS. We obtained VEP latency for a standard pattern-reversal checkerboard stimulus paradigm, in addition to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measures of whole brain volume (WBV), gray matter volume (GMV), white matter volume (WMV), and T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) white matter lesion volume (FLV). Correlation analyses indicated that prolonged VEP latency was significantly associated with lower WBV, GMV, and WMV, and greater FLV. VEP latency remained significantly associated with WBV, GMV, and WMV even after controlling for the variance associated with inter-ocular latency, age, time between VEP and MRI assessments, and other MRI variables. VEP latency delays were most pronounced in PwMS that exhibited low volume in both white and gray matter simultaneously. Furthermore, PwMS that had delayed VEP latency based on a clinically relevant cutoff (VEP latency ≥ 113 ms) in both eyes had lower WBV, GMV, and WMV and greater FLV in comparison to PwMS that had normal VEP latency in one or both eyes. The findings suggest that PwMS that have delayed latency in both eyes may be particularly at risk for exhibiting greater brain atrophy and lesion volume. These analyses also indicate that VEP latency may index combined gray matter and white matter disturbances, and therefore broader network connectivity and efficiency. VEP latency may therefore provide a surrogate marker of broader structural disturbances in the brain in MS.
Collapse
|
14
|
Oladosu O, Liu WQ, Brown L, Pike BG, Metz LM, Zhang Y. Advanced diffusion MRI and image texture analysis detect widespread brain structural differences between relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:944908. [PMID: 36034111 PMCID: PMC9413838 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.944908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Disease development in multiple sclerosis (MS) causes dramatic structural changes, but the exact changing patterns are unclear. Our objective is to investigate the differences in brain structure locally and spatially between relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and its advanced form, secondary progressive MS (SPMS), through advanced analysis of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and image texture. Methods A total of 20 patients with RRMS and nine patients with SPMS from two datasets underwent 3T anatomical and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The DTI was harmonized, augmented, and then modeled, which generated six voxel- and sub-voxel-scale measures. Texture analysis focused on T2 and FLAIR MRI, which produced two phase-based measures, namely, phase congruency and weighted mean phase. Data analysis was 3-fold, i.e., histogram analysis of whole-brain normal appearing white matter (NAWM); region of interest (ROI) analysis of NAWM and lesions within three critical white matter tracts, namely, corpus callosum, corticospinal tract, and optic radiation; and along-tract statistics. Furthermore, by calculating the z-score of core-rim pathology within lesions based on diffusion measures, we developed a novel method to define chronic active lesions and compared them between cohorts. Results Histogram features from diffusion and all but one texture measure differentiated between RRMS and SPMS. Within-tract ROI analysis detected cohort differences in both NAWM and lesions of the corpus callosum body in three measures of neurite orientation and anisotropy. Along-tract statistics detected cohort differences from multiple measures, particularly lesion extent, which increased significantly in SPMS in posterior corpus callosum and optic radiations. The number of chronic active lesions were also significantly higher (by 5-20% over z-scores 0.5 and 1.0) in SPMS than RRMS based on diffusion anisotropy, neurite content, and diameter. Conclusion Advanced diffusion MRI and texture analysis may be promising approaches for thorough understanding of brain structural changes from RRMS to SPMS, thereby providing new insight into disease development mechanisms in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olayinka Oladosu
- Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Wei-Qiao Liu
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lenora Brown
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Bruce G. Pike
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Luanne M. Metz
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Yunyan Zhang
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tagge IJ, Leppert IR, Fetco D, Campbell JS, Rudko DA, Brown RA, Stikov N, Pike GB, Giacomini PS, Arnold DL, Narayanan S. Permanent tissue damage in multiple sclerosis lesions is associated with reduced pre-lesion myelin and axon volume fractions. Mult Scler 2022; 28:2027-2037. [PMID: 35903888 PMCID: PMC9574230 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221110585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in MS research has led to new insights in lesion evolution and disease outcomes. It has not yet been determined if, or how, pre-lesional abnormalities in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) relate to the long-term evolution of new lesions. OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between abnormalities in MRI measures of axonal and myelin volume fractions (AVF and MVF) in NAWM preceding development of black-hole (BH) and non-BH lesions in people with MS. METHODS We obtained magnetization transfer and diffusion MRI at 6-month intervals in patients with MS to estimate MVF and AVF during lesion evolution. Lesions were classified as either BH or non-BH on the final imaging visit using T1 maps. RESULTS Longitudinal data from 97 new T2 lesions from 9 participants were analyzed; 25 lesions in 8 participants were classified as BH 6-12 months after initial appearance. Pre-lesion MVF, AVF, and MVF/AVF were significantly lower, and T1 was significantly higher, in the lesions that later became BHs (p < 0.001) compared to those that did not. No significant pre-lesion abnormalities were found in non-BH lesions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The present work demonstrated that pre-lesion abnormalities are associated with worse long-term lesion-level outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J Tagge
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ilana R Leppert
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Dumitru Fetco
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jennifer Sw Campbell
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David A Rudko
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Robert A Brown
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nikola Stikov
- Electrical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - G Bruce Pike
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Paul S Giacomini
- Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Douglas L Arnold
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sridar Narayanan
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute & Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yoon K, Archer DB, Clarke MA, Smith SA, Oguz I, Cutter G, Xu J, Bagnato F. Transcallosal and Corticospinal White Matter Disease and Its Association With Motor Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 2022; 13:811315. [PMID: 35785345 PMCID: PMC9240189 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.811315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In this cross-sectional, proof-of-concept study, we propose that using the more pathologically-specific neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) method, in conjunction with high-resolution probabilistic tractography, white matter tract templates can improve the assessment of regional axonal injury and its association with disability of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Methods Parametric maps of the neurite density index, orientation dispersion index, and the apparent isotropic volume fraction (IVF) were estimated in 18 pwMS and nine matched healthy controls (HCs). Tract-specific values were measured in transcallosal (TC) fibers from the paracentral lobules and TC and corticospinal fibers from the ventral and dorsal premotor areas, presupplementary and supplementary motor areas, and primary motor cortex. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test assessed group differences in the NODDI-derived metrics; the Spearman's rank correlation analyses measured associations between the NODDI metrics and other clinical or radiological variables. Results IVF values of the TC fiber bundles from the paracentral, presupplementary, and supplementary motor areas were both higher in pwMS than in HCs (p ≤ 0.045) and in pwMS with motor disability compared to those without motor disability (p ≤ 0.049). IVF in several TC tracts was associated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale score (p ≤ 0.047), while regional and overall lesion burden correlated with the Timed 25-Foot Walking Test (p ≤ 0.049). Conclusion IVF alterations are present in pwMS even when the other NODDI metrics are still mostly preserved. Changes in IVF are biologically non-specific and may not necessarily drive irreversible functional loss. However, by possibly preceding downstream pathologies that are strongly associated with disability accretion, IVF changes are indicators of, otherwise, occult prelesional tissue injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keejin Yoon
- Neuroimaging Unit, Division of Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
- College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Derek B. Archer
- Vanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Margareta A. Clarke
- Neuroimaging Unit, Division of Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Seth A. Smith
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Ipek Oguz
- Department of Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Gary Cutter
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Junzhong Xu
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Francesca Bagnato
- Neuroimaging Unit, Division of Neuroimmunology, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
- Department of Neurology, VA Medical Center, TN Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cohen-Adad J, Alonso-Ortiz E, Abramovic M, Arneitz C, Atcheson N, Barlow L, Barry RL, Barth M, Battiston M, Büchel C, Budde M, Callot V, Combes AJE, De Leener B, Descoteaux M, de Sousa PL, Dostál M, Doyon J, Dvorak A, Eippert F, Epperson KR, Epperson KS, Freund P, Finsterbusch J, Foias A, Fratini M, Fukunaga I, Wheeler-Kingshott CAMG, Germani G, Gilbert G, Giove F, Gros C, Grussu F, Hagiwara A, Henry PG, Horák T, Hori M, Joers J, Kamiya K, Karbasforoushan H, Keřkovský M, Khatibi A, Kim JW, Kinany N, Kitzler H, Kolind S, Kong Y, Kudlička P, Kuntke P, Kurniawan ND, Kusmia S, Labounek R, Laganà MM, Laule C, Law CS, Lenglet C, Leutritz T, Liu Y, Llufriu S, Mackey S, Martinez-Heras E, Mattera L, Nestrasil I, O'Grady KP, Papinutto N, Papp D, Pareto D, Parrish TB, Pichiecchio A, Prados F, Rovira À, Ruitenberg MJ, Samson RS, Savini G, Seif M, Seifert AC, Smith AK, Smith SA, Smith ZA, Solana E, Suzuki Y, Tackley G, Tinnermann A, Valošek J, Van De Ville D, Yiannakas MC, Weber KA, Weiskopf N, Wise RG, Wyss PO, Xu J. Generic acquisition protocol for quantitative MRI of the spinal cord. Nat Protoc 2021; 16:4611-4632. [PMID: 34400839 PMCID: PMC8811488 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00588-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative spinal cord (SC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) presents many challenges, including a lack of standardized imaging protocols. Here we present a prospectively harmonized quantitative MRI protocol, which we refer to as the spine generic protocol, for users of 3T MRI systems from the three main manufacturers: GE, Philips and Siemens. The protocol provides guidance for assessing SC macrostructural and microstructural integrity: T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging for SC cross-sectional area computation, multi-echo gradient echo for gray matter cross-sectional area, and magnetization transfer and diffusion weighted imaging for assessing white matter microstructure. In a companion paper from the same authors, the spine generic protocol was used to acquire data across 42 centers in 260 healthy subjects. The key details of the spine generic protocol are also available in an open-access document that can be found at https://github.com/spine-generic/protocols . The protocol will serve as a starting point for researchers and clinicians implementing new SC imaging initiatives so that, in the future, inclusion of the SC in neuroimaging protocols will be more common. The protocol could be implemented by any trained MR technician or by a researcher/clinician familiar with MRI acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Cohen-Adad
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Mila-Quebec AI Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Eva Alonso-Ortiz
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mihael Abramovic
- Department of Radiology, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Carina Arneitz
- Department of Radiology, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Atcheson
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Laura Barlow
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert L Barry
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Health Sciences & Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Markus Barth
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marco Battiston
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christian Büchel
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthew Budde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Virginie Callot
- Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France
- APHM, Hopital Universitaire Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France
| | - Anna J E Combes
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Benjamin De Leener
- Department of Computer and Software Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maxime Descoteaux
- Centre de Recherche CHUS, CIMS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Lab (SCIL), Computer Science department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Marek Dostál
- UHB - University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Julien Doyon
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Adam Dvorak
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Falk Eippert
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karla R Epperson
- Richard M. Lucas Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kevin S Epperson
- Richard M. Lucas Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Freund
- Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Finsterbusch
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexandru Foias
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michela Fratini
- Institute of Nanotechnology, CNR, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Issei Fukunaga
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Germani
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Federico Giove
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
- CREF - Museo storico della fisica e Centro studi e ricerche Enrico Fermi, Rome, Italy
| | - Charley Gros
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Francesco Grussu
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Radiomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pierre-Gilles Henry
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Tomáš Horák
- Multimodal and functional imaging laboratory, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Masaaki Hori
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - James Joers
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kouhei Kamiya
- Department of Radiology, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haleh Karbasforoushan
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Miloš Keřkovský
- UHB - University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ali Khatibi
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joo-Won Kim
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nawal Kinany
- Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hagen Kitzler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Shannon Kolind
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Yazhuo Kong
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Wellcome Centre For Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Petr Kudlička
- Multimodal and functional imaging laboratory, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Paul Kuntke
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nyoman D Kurniawan
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Slawomir Kusmia
- CUBRIC, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, University College London, London, UK
- Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK
| | - René Labounek
- Division of Clinical Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Departments of Neurology and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | | | - Cornelia Laule
- Departments of Radiology, Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Physics & Astronomy; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christine S Law
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Christophe Lenglet
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Tobias Leutritz
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Yaou Liu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Tiantan Image Research Center, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Sara Llufriu
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sean Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eloy Martinez-Heras
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Loan Mattera
- Fondation Campus Biotech Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Igor Nestrasil
- Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Division of Clinical Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristin P O'Grady
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nico Papinutto
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Papp
- NeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Wellcome Centre For Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Neuroradiology Section, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Todd B Parrish
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Anna Pichiecchio
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ferran Prados
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, University College London, London, UK
- E-health Centre, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Neuroradiology Section, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc J Ruitenberg
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca S Samson
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Giovanni Savini
- Brain MRI 3T Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maryam Seif
- Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alan C Seifert
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex K Smith
- Wellcome Centre For Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Seth A Smith
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Zachary A Smith
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Elisabeth Solana
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yuichi Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Alexandra Tinnermann
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Valošek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Dimitri Van De Ville
- Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marios C Yiannakas
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kenneth A Weber
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nikolaus Weiskopf
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Richard G Wise
- CUBRIC, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio University" of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Patrik O Wyss
- Department of Radiology, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Junqian Xu
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute (BMEII), Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maggi P, Kuhle J, Schädelin S, van der Meer F, Weigel M, Galbusera R, Mathias A, Lu PJ, Rahmanzadeh R, Benkert P, La Rosa F, Bach Cuadra M, Sati P, Théaudin M, Pot C, van Pesch V, Leppert D, Stadelmann C, Kappos L, Du Pasquier R, Reich DS, Absinta M, Granziera C. Chronic White Matter Inflammation and Serum Neurofilament Levels in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 2021; 97:e543-e553. [PMID: 34088875 PMCID: PMC8424501 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether chronic white matter inflammation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as detected in vivo by paramagnetic rim MRI lesions (PRLs) is associated with higher serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels, a marker of neuroaxonal damage. METHODS In 118 patients with MS with no gadolinium-enhancing lesions or recent relapses, we analyzed 3D-submillimeter phase MRI and sNfL levels. Histopathologic evaluation was performed in 25 MS lesions from 20 additional autopsy MS cases. RESULTS In univariable analyses, participants with ≥2 PRLs (n = 43) compared to those with ≤1 PRL (n = 75) had higher age-adjusted sNfL percentiles (median, 91 and 68; p < 0.001) and higher Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale scores (MSSS median, 4.3 and 2.4; p = 0.003). In multivariable analyses, sNfL percentile levels were higher in PRLs ≥2 cases (βadd, 16.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-28.0; p < 0.01), whereas disease-modifying treatment (DMT), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and T2 lesion load did not affect sNfL. In a similar model, sNfL percentile levels were highest in cases with ≥4 PRLs (n = 30; βadd, 30.4; 95% CI, 15.6-45.2; p < 0.01). Subsequent multivariable analysis revealed that PRLs ≥2 cases also had higher MSSS (βadd, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.3-1.9; p < 0.01), whereas MSSS was not affected by DMT or T2 lesion load. On histopathology, both chronic active and smoldering lesions exhibited more severe acute axonal damage at the lesion edge than in the lesion center (edge vs center: p = 0.004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). CONCLUSION Chronic white matter inflammation was associated with increased levels of sNfL and disease severity in nonacute MS, suggesting that PRL contribute to clinically relevant, inflammation-driven neurodegeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Maggi
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jens Kuhle
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sabine Schädelin
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Franziska van der Meer
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Matthias Weigel
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Riccardo Galbusera
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amandine Mathias
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Po-Jui Lu
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Reza Rahmanzadeh
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pascal Benkert
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Francesco La Rosa
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Meritxell Bach Cuadra
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Pascal Sati
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Marie Théaudin
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Caroline Pot
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vincent van Pesch
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - David Leppert
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christine Stadelmann
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Renaud Du Pasquier
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel S Reich
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martina Absinta
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cristina Granziera
- From the Department of Neurology (P.M., V.v.P.), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Departments of Neurology (P.M., A.M., M.T., C.P., R.D.P.) and Radiology (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.), Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University; Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedical Engineering (J.K., M.W., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., D.L., L.K., C.G.) and Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk), Department of Biomedical Engineering Basel (M.W., R.G., R.G., P.-J.L., R.R., C.G.), Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, MS Center and Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), and Clinical Trial Unit, Department of Clinical Research (S.S., P.B.), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Neuropathology (F.v.d.M., C.S.), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany; Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology (M.W.), University Hospital Basel; Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5) (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging (F.L.R., M.B.C.), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (P.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R., M.A.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda; and Department of Neurology (D.S.R., M.A.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen A, Wen S, Lakhani DA, Gao S, Yoon K, Smith SA, Dortch R, Xu J, Bagnato F. Assessing brain injury topographically using MR neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2021; 31:1003-1013. [PMID: 34033187 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Axonal injury is a key player of disability in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Yet, detecting and measuring it in vivo is challenging. The neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) proposes a novel framework for probing axonal integrity in vivo. NODDI at 3.0 Tesla was used to quantify tissue damage in pwMS and its relationship with disease progression. METHODS Eighteen pwMS (4 clinically isolated syndrome, 11 relapsing remitting, and 3 secondary progressive MS) and nine age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent a brain MRI, inclusive of clinical sequences and a multi-shell diffusion acquisition. Parametric maps of axial diffusivity (AD), neurite density index (ndi), apparent isotropic volume fraction (ivf), and orientation dispersion index (odi) were fitted. Anatomically matched regions of interest were used to quantify AD and NODDI-derived metrics and to assess the relations between these measures and those of disease progression. RESULTS AD, ndi, ivf, and odi significantly differed between chronic black holes (cBHs) and T2-lesions, and between the latter and normal appearing white matter (NAWM). All metrics except ivf significantly differed between NAWM located next to a cBH and that situated contra-laterally. Only NAWM odi was significantly associated with T2-lesion volume, the timed 25-foot walk test and disease duration. CONCLUSIONS NODDI is sensitive to tissue injury but its relationship with clinical progression remains limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalie Chen
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Neurology Residency, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sijin Wen
- Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Dhairya A Lakhani
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Si Gao
- Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Keejin Yoon
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Vanderbilt University College of Arts and Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Seth A Smith
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, VUMC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Richard Dortch
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, VUMC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Junzhong Xu
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, VUMC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Francesca Bagnato
- Neuroimaging Unit, Neuroimmunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Neurology, VA Hospital, TN Valley Healthcare System (TVHS) Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tagge IJ, Kohama SG, Sherman LS, Bourdette DN, Woltjer R, Wang P, Wong SW, Rooney WD. MRI characteristics of Japanese macaque encephalomyelitis: Comparison to human diseases. J Neuroimaging 2021; 31:480-492. [PMID: 33930224 PMCID: PMC8722403 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To describe MRI findings in Japanese macaque encephalomyelitis (JME) with emphasis on lesion characteristics, lesion evolution, normal-appearing brain tissue, and similarities to human demyelinating disease. METHODS MRI data were obtained from 114 Japanese macaques, 30 presenting neurological signs of JME. All animals were screened for presence of T2 -weighted white matter signal hyperintensities; animals with behavioral signs of JME were additionally screened for contrast-enhancing lesions. Whole-brain quantitative T1 maps were collected, and histogram analysis was performed with regression across age to evaluate microstructural changes in normal appearing brain tissue in JME and neurologically normal animals. Quantitative estimates of blood-brain-barrier (BBB) permeability to gadolinium-based-contrast agent (GBCA) were obtained in acute, GBCA-enhancing lesions. Longitudinal imaging data were acquired for 15 JME animals. RESULTS One hundred and seventy-three focal GBCA-enhancing lesions were identified in 30 animals demonstrating behavioral signs of neurological dysfunction. JME GBCA-enhancing lesions were typically focal and ovoid, demonstrating highest BBB GBCA permeability in the lesion core, similar to acute, focal multiple sclerosis lesions. New GBCA-enhancing lesions arose rapidly from normal-appearing tissue, and BBB permeability remained elevated for weeks. T1 values in normal-appearing tissue were significantly associated with age, but not with sex or disease. CONCLUSIONS Intense, focal neuroinflammation is a key MRI finding in JME. Several features of JME compare directly to human inflammatory demyelinating diseases. Investigation of JME combined with the development and validation of noninvasive imaging biomarkers offers substantial potential to improve diagnostic specificity and contribute to the understanding of human demyelinating diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J. Tagge
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 Rue University, Montréal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Steven G. Kohama
- Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 505 NW 185th Ave, Beaverton, OR 97006, United States
| | - Larry S. Sherman
- Division of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 505 NW 185th Ave, Beaverton, OR 97006, United States
| | - Dennis N. Bourdette
- Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
| | - Randall Woltjer
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
| | - Paul Wang
- Department of Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
| | - Scott W. Wong
- Division of Pathobiology & Immunology, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 505 NW 185th Ave, Beaverton, OR 97006, United States
- Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 505 NW 185th Ave, Beaverton, OR 97006, United States
| | - William D. Rooney
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
- Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cooper G, Chien C, Zimmermann H, Bellmann-Strobl J, Ruprecht K, Kuchling J, Asseyer S, Brandt AU, Scheel M, Finke C, Paul F. Longitudinal analysis of T1w/T2w ratio in patients with multiple sclerosis from first clinical presentation. Mult Scler 2021; 27:2180-2190. [PMID: 33856249 PMCID: PMC8597181 DOI: 10.1177/13524585211003479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background: Cross-sectional studies suggest normal appearing white matter (NAWM) integrity loss may lead to cortical atrophy in late-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: To investigate the relationship between NAWM integrity and cortical thickness from first clinical presentation longitudinally. Methods: NAWM integrity and cortical thickness were assessed with 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 102 patients with clinically isolated syndrome or early MS (33.2 (20.1–60.1) years old, 68% female) from first clinical presentation over 2.8 ± 1.6 years. Fifty healthy controls (HCs) matched for age and sex were included. NAWM integrity was evaluated using the standardized T1w/T2w ratio (sT1w/T2w). The association between sT1w/T2w and cortical thickness was assessed using linear mixed models. The effect of disease activity was investigated using the No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3) criteria. Results: At baseline, sT1w/T2w (p = 0.152) and cortical thickness (p = 0.489) did not differ from HCs. Longitudinally, decreasing sT1w/T2w was associated with cortical thickness and increasing lesion burden (marginal R2 = 0.061). The association was modulated by failing NEDA-3 (marginal R2 = 0.097). Conclusion: sT1w/T2w may be a useful MRI biomarker for early MS, detecting relevant NAWM damage over time using conventional MRI scans, although with less sensitivity compared to quantitative measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Cooper
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/ Department of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research, Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany/ Einstein Center for Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Chien
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/ Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy-Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hanna Zimmermann
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/ NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/ NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Ruprecht
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joseph Kuchling
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanna Asseyer
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander U Brandt
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Michael Scheel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/Department of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Finke
- Einstein Center for Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany/Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/ NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany/Einstein Center for Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany/Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Petracca M, Pontillo G, Moccia M, Carotenuto A, Cocozza S, Lanzillo R, Brunetti A, Brescia Morra V. Neuroimaging Correlates of Cognitive Dysfunction in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis. Brain Sci 2021; 11:346. [PMID: 33803287 PMCID: PMC8000635 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11030346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a frequent and meaningful symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS), caused by the accrual of brain structural damage only partially counteracted by effective functional reorganization. As both these aspects can be successfully investigated through the application of advanced neuroimaging, here, we offer an up-to-date overview of the latest findings on structural, functional and metabolic correlates of cognitive impairment in adults with MS, focusing on the mechanisms sustaining damage accrual and on the identification of useful imaging markers of cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Petracca
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.P.); (M.M.); (A.C.); (V.B.M.)
| | - Giuseppe Pontillo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.P.); (S.C.); (A.B.)
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Moccia
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.P.); (M.M.); (A.C.); (V.B.M.)
| | - Antonio Carotenuto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.P.); (M.M.); (A.C.); (V.B.M.)
| | - Sirio Cocozza
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.P.); (S.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Roberta Lanzillo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.P.); (M.M.); (A.C.); (V.B.M.)
| | - Arturo Brunetti
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.P.); (S.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Brescia Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.P.); (M.M.); (A.C.); (V.B.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Inojosa H, Proschmann U, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression? Front Neurol 2021; 11:628542. [PMID: 33551982 PMCID: PMC7859270 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.628542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The presence of disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important hallmark for MS patients in the course of their disease. The transition from relapsing remitting (RRMS) to secondary progressive forms of the disease (SPMS) represents a significant change in their quality of life and perception of the disease. It could also be a therapeutic key for opportunities, where approaches different from those in the initial phases of the disease can be adopted. The characterization of structural biomarkers (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging or neurofilament light chain) has been proposed to differentiate between both phenotypes. However, there is no definite threshold between them. Whether the risk of clinical progression can be predicted by structural markers at early disease phases is still a focus of clinical research. However, several theories and pathological evidence suggest that both disease phenotypes are part of a continuum with common pathophysiological mechanisms. In this case, the clinical evaluation of the patients would play a preponderant role above destruction biomarkers for the early identification of disability progression and SPMS. For this purpose, the use of clinical tools beyond the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) should be considered. Besides established functional tests such as the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), patient's neurological history or digital resources may help neurologists in the decision-taking. In this article, we discuss arguments for the use of clinical markers in the detection of secondary progressive MS and the characterization of progressive disease activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hernan Inojosa
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Undine Proschmann
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cooper G, Hirsch S, Scheel M, Brandt AU, Paul F, Finke C, Boehm-Sturm P, Hetzer S. Quantitative Multi-Parameter Mapping Optimized for the Clinical Routine. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:611194. [PMID: 33364921 PMCID: PMC7750476 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.611194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Using quantitative multi-parameter mapping (MPM), studies can investigate clinically relevant microstructural changes with high reliability over time and across subjects and sites. However, long acquisition times (20 min for the standard 1-mm isotropic protocol) limit its translational potential. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity gain of a fast 1.6-mm isotropic MPM protocol including post-processing optimized for longitudinal clinical studies. 6 healthy volunteers (35±7 years old; 3 female) were scanned at 3T to acquire the following whole-brain MPM maps with 1.6 mm isotropic resolution: proton density (PD), magnetization transfer saturation (MT), longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), and transverse relaxation rate (R2*). MPM maps were generated using two RF transmit field (B1+) correction methods: (1) using an acquired B1+ map and (2) using a data-driven approach. Maps were generated with and without Gibb's ringing correction. The intra-/inter-subject coefficient of variation (CoV) of all maps in the gray and white matter, as well as in all anatomical regions of a fine-grained brain atlas, were compared between the different post-processing methods using Student's t-test. The intra-subject stability of the 1.6-mm MPM protocol is 2–3 times higher than for the standard 1-mm sequence and can be achieved in less than half the scan duration. Intra-subject variability for all four maps in white matter ranged from 1.2–5.3% and in gray matter from 1.8 to 9.2%. Bias-field correction using an acquired B1+ map significantly improved intra-subject variability of PD and R1 in the gray (42%) and white matter (54%) and correcting the raw images for the effect of Gibb's ringing further improved intra-subject variability in all maps in the gray (11%) and white matter (10%). Combining Gibb's ringing correction and bias field correction using acquired B1+ maps provides excellent stability of the 7-min MPM sequence with 1.6 mm resolution suitable for the clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Cooper
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hirsch
- Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Scheel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander U Brandt
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Finke
- Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Boehm-Sturm
- Department of Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence and Charité Core Facility 7T Experimental MRIs, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Hetzer
- Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jelescu IO, Palombo M, Bagnato F, Schilling KG. Challenges for biophysical modeling of microstructure. J Neurosci Methods 2020; 344:108861. [PMID: 32692999 PMCID: PMC10163379 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The biophysical modeling efforts in diffusion MRI have grown considerably over the past 25 years. In this review, we dwell on the various challenges along the journey of bringing a biophysical model from initial design to clinical implementation, identifying both hurdles that have been already overcome and outstanding issues. First, we describe the critical initial task of selecting which features of tissue microstructure can be estimated using a model and which acquisition protocol needs to be implemented to make the estimation possible. The model performance should necessarily be tested in realistic numerical simulations and in experimental data - adapting the fitting strategy accordingly, and parameter estimates should be validated against complementary techniques, when/if available. Secondly, the model performance and validity should be explored in pathological conditions, and, if appropriate, dedicated models for pathology should be developed. We build on examples from tumors, ischemia and demyelinating diseases. We then discuss the challenges associated with clinical translation and added value. Finally, we single out four major unresolved challenges that are related to: the availability of a microstructural ground truth, the validation of model parameters which cannot be accessed with complementary techniques, the development of a generalized standard model for any brain region and pathology, and the seamless communication between different parties involved in the development and application of biophysical models of diffusion.
Collapse
|
26
|
Zeng Y, Li Z, Zhu H, Gu Z, Zhang H, Luo K. Recent Advances in Nanomedicines for Multiple Sclerosis Therapy. ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS 2020; 3:6571-6597. [PMID: 35019387 DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.0c00953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yujun Zeng
- Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zhiqian Li
- Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hongyan Zhu
- Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zhongwei Gu
- Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hu Zhang
- Amgen Bioprocessing Centre, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, California 91711, United States
| | - Kui Luo
- Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Optimization and numerical evaluation of multi-compartment diffusion MRI using the spherical mean technique for practical multiple sclerosis imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 74:56-63. [PMID: 32898649 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The multi-compartment diffusion MRI using the spherical mean technique (SMT) has been suggested to enhance the pathological specificity to tissue injury in multiple sclerosis (MS) imaging, but its accuracy and precision have not been comprehensively evaluated. METHODS A Cramer-Rao Lower Bound method was used to optimize an SMT protocol for MS imaging. Finite difference computer simulations of spins in packed cylinders were then performed to evaluate the influences of five realistic pathological features in MS lesions: axon diameter, axon density, free water fraction, axonal crossing, dispersion, and undulation. RESULTS SMT derived metrics can be biased by some confounds of pathological variations, such as axon size and free water fraction. However, SMT in general provides valuable information to characterize pathological features in MS lesions with a clinically feasible protocol. CONCLUSION SMT may be used as a practical MS imaging method and should be further improved in clinical MS imaging.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kipp M. Does Siponimod Exert Direct Effects in the Central Nervous System? Cells 2020; 9:cells9081771. [PMID: 32722245 PMCID: PMC7463861 DOI: 10.3390/cells9081771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The modulation of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor is an approved treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis because of its anti-inflammatory effect of retaining lymphocytes in lymph nodes. Different sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor subtypes are expressed in the brain and spinal cord, and their pharmacological effects may improve disease development and neuropathology. Siponimod (BAF312) is a novel sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator that has recently been approved for the treatment of active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). In this review article, we summarize recent evidence suggesting that the active role of siponimod in patients with progressive MS may be due to direct interaction with central nervous system cells. Additionally, we tried to summarize our current understanding of the function of siponimod and discuss the effects observed in the case of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Kipp
- Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenstrasse 9, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|