Effects of the oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban on routine coagulation assays and anti-FXa assays

How to deal with interference on heparin anti-Xa activity caused by oral factor FXa inhibitors: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation

Monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH) to ensure effective anticoagulation may be performed using anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) instead of the activated partial thromboplastin time. However, in patients who have been treated with oral factor (F)Xa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban) while switching to UFH therapy, there is a risk that these oral anti-FXa drugs could interfere with UFH-calibrated anti-Xa monitoring. This may lead to inappropriate anticoagulation management. This report of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation summarizes the evidence on the risk of interference from previous treatment with oral FXa inhibitors and UFH anti-Xa after heparin initiation. This communication provides pragmatic recommendations for UFH initiation and management with anti-Xa monitoring after switching from oral FXa inhibitors.

Evaluation of MRX PT DOAC as a new screening method for detecting interferences in thrombophilia analyses

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can interfere with coagulation analyses, causing erroneous results such as false-positive lupus anticoagulant and false-normal antithrombin, threatening patient safety when overlooked. A test using a prothrombin time quotient method to detect DOAC presence in plasma samples is now commercially available, the MRX PT DOAC, with the result expressed as Clot Time Ratio (CTR).

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the ability of MRX PT DOAC to identify interfering apixaban or rivaroxaban concentrations, identify non-interfering or interfering patient samples, and detect whether a patient is on DOAC treatment.

METHODS

An MRX PT DOAC reference interval was established, and MRX PT DOAC results related to FXa inhibitor concentrations. MRX PT DOAC patient plasma results were related to indications of analytical interference with lupus anticoagulant and antithrombin analyses and with the patients' anticoagulant drug use, according to medical records.

RESULTS

The MRX PT DOAC CTR reference interval was 0.98-1.38. MRX PT DOAC apixaban and rivaroxaban interference detection sensitivity was 1.00 (0.96 - 1.0). For subgroups from 315 patient plasma samples, the negative predictive values estimates were 0.84 or above (95% confidence interval minimum 0.64) for excluding analysis interference with the lupus anticoagulant and antithrombin analyses and for excluding DOAC treatment as per medical records. All 9 interference-indicating DOAC samples were identified for the lupus anticoagulant analyses, 5 out of 11 for antithrombin.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRX PT DOAC is a potential screening tool for interference. Confirming results in a larger DOAC patient group and further investigating the antithrombin interference detection uncertainty is important.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of apixaban and rivaroxaban in dogs

BACKGROUND

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of apixaban and rivaroxaban have not been studied in dogs and the propensity of these drugs to cause hypercoagulability after discontinuation is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

Compare the PK/PD of clinical dosing regimens of PO apixaban and rivaroxaban administered repeatedly to healthy dogs and assess the effect of abrupt drug discontinuation on coagulation.

ANIMALS

Six University-owned, purpose-bred, middle-aged, mixed-breed dogs (4 male, 2 female).

METHODS

Dogs were given apixaban or rivaroxaban PO at 0.5 mg/kg q12h for 7 days with a 14-day washout period between drugs. Plasma drug concentrations were quantitated, and anticoagulant effects were measured using clotting times, calibrated anti-Xa bioactivity assays, and measurements of thrombin generation. The potential for rebound hypercoagulability was assessed by measuring D-dimers, thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes, and antithrombin activity after drug discontinuation.

RESULTS

Plasma drug concentrations and anti-Xa bioactivities were closely correlated for both drugs, but drug concentrations varied considerably among dogs, despite consistent dose regimens. Thrombin generation variables were significantly correlated with the anti-Xa bioactivity of both drugs and no significant differences in the effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban on thrombin generation were observed. Drug discontinuation had no effect on D-dimer concentrations. The concentration of TAT complexes decreased after apixaban discontinuation and did not change after rivaroxaban discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Repeated PO administration of apixaban or rivaroxaban to healthy dogs produced comparable anticoagulant effects measured by inhibition of thrombin formation. Rebound hypercoagulability after drug discontinuation was not observed and weaning of these drugs in clinical patients might not be necessary.

DOAC-Remove to counteract the interference of anti-Xa oral anticoagulants on the monitoring of heparin

INTRODUCTION

The monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) by anti-factor Xa activity (AXA) is commonly used to ensure effective anticoagulation and prevent bleeding risk. However, in patients previously treated with an anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) switching to UFH therapy, there is a risk of interference that may lead to inappropriate anticoagulation. The first objective of this study was to validate DOAC-Remove to remove DOAC for measuring UFH specific AXA. The second objective was to assess the length of DOAC interference on UFH monitoring and to identify potential predictive factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This monocentric retrospective study included all patients admitted from April 2019 to April 2021 previously treated with anti-Xa DOAC, and for whom an interference on UFH monitoring was suspected. Interference was defined as a difference in the AXA measured before and after using DOAC-Remove >2.8-fold standard deviation of the method.

RESULTS

Removal with DOAC-Remove was specific of DOAC (apixaban n = 42, rivaroxaban n = 41, UFH n = 20) and sufficient to avoid interference on UFH AXA measurement. The exact interference length was 6.0 days [IQR 3.0-11.0] for apixaban (n = 26) and 4.5 days [IQR 2.0-5.8] for rivaroxaban (n = 20). Among the 89 patients sorted based on an interference length ≤ or >3 days, 74 (83.1%) presented an interference greater than 3 days. Correlations were observed with age for apixaban and creatinine for rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that DOAC-Remove could be of high interest in patients receiving UFH previously treated with an anti-Xa DOAC even if DOAC was stopped for more than 3 days.

Laboratory Evaluation of Interferences Associated with Factor XIa Inhibitors Asundexian and Milvexian in Routine Coagulation Assays

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for the treatment of thrombosis. While inhibitors of factor IIa and factor Xa have shown effectiveness, the risk of bleeding remains a significant concern. Recently, direct factor XIa inhibitors-including asundexian and milvexian-have emerged as potential anticoagulation therapies, based on clinical observations that patients with factor XIa deficiencies seldom present with spontaneous bleeding tendencies. The interferences associated with DOACs in routine and specialised coagulation assays are well-described; however, the interferences associated with emerging FXIa inhibitors are largely uncharacterised. Here, we briefly report the impact of asundexian and milvexian in routine coagulation assays using in vitro plasma-based systems. Asundexian and milvexian induce concentration-dependent prolongations in APTT-based assays with curvilinear regressions, which may be suitable for the measurement of pharmacodynamic effects at peak levels ex vivo. We also report differential sensitivities of APTT-based assays-particularly at higher FXIa inhibitor concentrations-highlighting the clinical need for an extensive evaluation of interferences associated with FXIa inhibitors in coagulation assays.

Clot time ratio (CTR) and treatment outcomes in Apixaban-treated atrial fibrillation patients

There are clinical situations where information about the anticoagulant effects of Apixaban could be useful. Specialised methods for measuring Apixaban concentrations are not available at all medical laboratories while methods for measuring the functional effects of Apixaban, using clot time ratio (CTR), can be performed in most medical laboratories around the clock using well-established measurement procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate CTR in trough and peak samples during Apixaban treatment of atrial fibrillation and to correlate the findings to bleeds and thrombotic events. Three trough- and three peak samples from 61 patients (31 on Apixaban 5 mg twice daily and 30 on Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily) were analysed with MRX PT DOAC. Patients were followed for 30 + /-15 months, and bleeds and thrombotic events were documented. The effect of Apixaban could be measured with MRX PT DOAC and there was a statistically significant difference between CTR in trough samples compared to peak samples (p < 0.001). A total of 21 patients suffered bleeds during follow-up; two patients suffered major bleeds, and 19 suffered minor bleeds. Patients with major bleeds had both mean peak- and mean trough CTR above the respective first to third quartile (Q1-Q3) range. Four patients suffered thromboembolic events. Generally, the peak CTRs were below or in the lower end of the peak Q1-Q3 for these patients. The new test MRX PT DOAC can be used to measure the effect of Apixaban during the treatment of atrial fibrillation. High mean peak- and mean trough CTR were seen in 2 patients with major bleeds, and low peak CTR was seen in 4 patients with thromboembolic events.

Elevated International Normalized Ratio and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with a prolongation of the prothrombin time and an increased international normalized ratio (INR). The clinical significance of these changes is unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between an elevated INR on admission and in-hospital death and long-term survival in patients treated with DOACs.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively retrieved from records of hospitalized patients at the Sheba Medical Center between November 2008 and July 2023. Patients were selected based on DOAC treatment, coagulation profile, and INR test done within 48 hours of hospitalization. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and mortality in the year following hospitalization.

RESULTS

The study included 11,399 hospitalized patients treated with DOACs. Patients with elevated INR had a 180% higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.30-3.39) and a 57% increased risk of death during the following year (adjusted hazard ratio 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-1.71). Similar results were observed in subgroup analyses for each DOAC.

CONCLUSIONS

An elevated INR on admission is associated with a higher risk for in-hospital death and increased risk for mortality during the first year following hospitalization in hospitalized patients treated with DOACs. This highlights that elevated INR levels in patients on DOACs should not be dismissed as laboratory variations due to DOAC treatment, as they may serve as a prognostic marker.

Apixaban overdose in children: case report and proposed management. A brief communication from the Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis SSC of ISTH

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants are commonly prescribed for adults and increasingly also for children requiring anticoagulation therapy. While household medications should not be accessible to children, accidental, and intentional overdoses occur.

Key Clinical Question

How should apixaban overdose in children be managed?.

Clinical Approach

We present a case of an accidental overdose with the factor Xa antagonist apixaban in a young child and propose an approach to the management of cases of apixaban overdose in children.

Conclusion

Given the increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants, it is important to have an approach to the management of overdose of these medications.

Removing direct oral factor Xa inhibitor interferences from routine and specialised coagulation assays using a raw activated charcoal product

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. However, DOACs are associated with extensive interference in coagulation assays. Herein, we evaluate raw activated charcoal (AC) as an adsorbent material, to minimise DOAC-associated interferences in routine and specialised coagulation parameters on CS-series analysers (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan).

METHODS

Commercial human-derived non-anticoagulated plasma materials, with or without increasing concentrations of anticoagulant, were assayed for routine and specialised coagulation parameters before and after treatment with AC.

RESULTS

Treatment of non-anticoagulated plasma with raw AC had minimal impact on routine and specialised coagulation parameters available on the CS-series; however, clinically relevant prolongations of certain activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based assays were observed after treatment. Furthermore, in apixaban- and rivaroxaban-containing plasma material, AC efficiently adsorbed therapeutic and supratherapeutic DOAC concentrations; and, treatment with raw AC resolved DOAC-associated interferences on all affected routine and specialised coagulation parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, raw AC efficiently adsorbed apixaban and rivaroxaban from human-derived plasma, without significantly affecting the majority of underlying routine and specialised coagulation parameters available on CS-series analysers.

Dental Implant Surgery for Patients Receiving Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs); Clinical Considerations and Management: A Mini-review

Background:

Dental implants are one of the most prevalent operations in dental clinics, as they are the ideal solution to replace teeth. However, many patients who need this treatment are older and suffering from heart diseases, especially atrial fibrillation, which requires anticoagulants. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are considered modern anticoagulants, and they include four common medications: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, we review the literature regarding the proper management of patients receiving NOACs in dental implant clinics based on papers published in the last decade (2010-2022). A comprehensive search on the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify articles evaluating the relationship between Non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants and dental implant surgery.

Results:

Despite the limitations of this study, it has been found that dental implants require discontinuation of NOACs for 24 hours or more prior to implant surgery. This depends on the type of anticoagulant and the creatinine clearance (CrCl).

Conclusion:

Implant surgery requires interruption of NOACs ≥24 hours preoperatively. However, there is a need for further clinical studies in order to establish more evidence-based guidelines.

Pitfalls in Coagulation Testing

Assays in the coagulation laboratory are affected by numerous variables. Variables which have impact on the test result can lead to incorrect results, and potentially to consequences for further diagnostic and therapeutic decisions made by the clinician. The interferences can be separated into three main groups: biological interferences, with an actual impairment of the patient's coagulation system (congenital or acquired); physical interferences, which usually occur in the pre-analytical phase; and chemical interferences, because of the presence of drugs (mainly anticoagulants) in the blood to be tested. This article discusses some of these interferences in seven instructive cases of (near) miss events as an approach to generate more attention to these issues.

Testing for Lupus Anticoagulants

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is one of the three criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) employed in classification, and by default diagnosis, of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Detection of LA is not via calibrated assays but is based on functional behavior of the antibodies in a medley of coagulation assays. A prolonged clotting time in a screening test is followed by demonstration of phospholipid dependence and inhibitory properties in confirmatory and mixing tests, respectively, which are modifications of the parent screening test. Complications arise because no single screening test is sensitive to every LA, and no test is specific for LA, because they are prone to interference by other causes of elevated clotting times. Several screening tests are available but the pairing of dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) with LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is widely used and recommended because it is proven to have good detection rates. Nonetheless, judicious use of other assays can improve diagnostic performance, such as dilute prothrombin time to find LA unreactive with dRVVT and aPTT, and the recently validated Taipan snake venom time with ecarin time confirmatory test that are unaffected by vitamin K antagonist and direct factor Xa inhibitor anticoagulation. Expert body guidelines and their updates have improved harmonization of laboratory practices, although some issues continue to attract debate, such as the place of mixing tests in the medley hierarchy, and areas of data manipulation such as assay cut-offs and ratio generation. This article reviews current practices and challenges in the laboratory detection of LA.

Inherited Thrombophilia in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Severe inherited thrombophilia includes rare deficiencies of natural anticoagulants (antithrombin and proteins C and S) and homozygous or combined factor V Leiden and FII G20210A variants. They are associated with a high thrombosis risk and can impact the duration of anticoagulation therapy for patients with a venous thromboembolism (VTE) event. Therefore, it is important to diagnose thrombophilia and to use adapted anticoagulant therapy. The widespread use of direct anticoagulants (DOACs) for VTE has raised new issues concerning inherited thrombophilia. Concerning inherited thrombophilia diagnosis, DOACs are directed toward either FIIa or FXa and can therefore interfere with coagulation assays. This paper reports DOAC interference in several thrombophilia tests, including the assessment of antithrombin, protein S, and protein C activities. Antithrombin activity and clot-based assays used for proteins C and S can be overestimated, with a risk of missing a deficiency. The use of a device to remove DOACs should be considered to minimize the risk of false-negative results. The place of DOACs in the treatment of VTE in thrombophilia patients is also discussed. Available data are encouraging, but given the variability in thrombosis risk within natural anticoagulant deficiencies, evidence in patients with well-characterized thrombophilia would be useful.

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) interference in hemostasis assays

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a group of direct coagulation factor inhibitors including both direct thrombin inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors. These medications may cause hemostasis assay interference by falsely increasing or decreasing measured values, depending on the analyte. Considering the potential for DOAC interference in a variety of hemostasis assays is essential to avoid erroneous interpretation of results. Preanalytic strategies to avoid DOAC interference include selecting alternatives to clot-based hemostasis assays in patients taking DOACs when possible and sample collection timed when the patient is off anticoagulant therapy or at the expected drug trough. Clinical laboratories may also provide educational materials that clearly describe possible interferences from DOAC, develop testing algorithms to aid in detection of DOAC in submitted samples, use DOAC-neutralizing agents to remove DOACs before continuing with testing, and write interpretive comments that explain the effects of DOAC interference in hemostasis tests. Using a combination of the described strategies will aid physicians and laboratorians in correctly interpreting hemostasis and thrombosis laboratory tests in the presence of DOACs.

Comprehensive review of the impact of direct oral anticoagulants on thrombophilia diagnostic tests: Practical recommendations for the laboratory

There is a laboratory and clinical need to know the impact of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on diagnostic tests to avoid misinterpretation of results. Although the regulatory labelling documents provide some information about the influences of each DOAC on diagnostic tests, these are usually limited to some of the most common tests and no head to head comparison is available. In this paper, we report the impact of DOACs on several thrombophilia tests, including assessment of antithrombin, protein S and protein C activity assays, detection of activated protein C resistance and assays used for lupus anticoagulant. Results are compared and discussed with data obtained from literature. The final goal of this comprehensive review is to provide practical recommendations for laboratories to avoid misdiagnosis due to oral direct factor Xa (FXa) or IIa (FIIa) inhibitors. Overall, oral direct FXa (apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) and FIIa (dabigatran) antagonists may affect clot-based thrombophilia diagnostic tests resulting in false-positive or false-negative results. An effect on FIIa-based thrombophilia diagnostic tests is observed with dabigatran but not with anti-FXa DOACs and conversely for FXa-based thrombophilia diagnostic tests. No impact was observed with antigenic/chromogenic methods for the assessment of protein S and C activity. In conclusion, interpretation of thrombophilia diagnostic tests results should be done with caution in patients on DOACs. The use of a device/chemical compound able to remove or antagonize the effect of DOACs or the development of new diagnostic tests insensitive to DOACs should be considered to minimize the risk of false results.

Unveiling the complex effects of direct oral anticoagulants on dilute Russell's viper venom time assays

INTRODUCTION

Dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) assays can be affected by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which may cause false-positive results. However, there are conflicting results indicating significant differences between different reagents and DOACs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of DOACs on dRVVT assays.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples were prepared by adding DOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) to pooled normal plasma in the concentration range 0 to 800 µg/L. Six integrated dRVVT reagents were used, all composed of a screen assay (low phospholipid content) and a confirm assay (high phospholipid content). The screen/confirm dRVVT results were expressed as normalized ratios. To further evaluate the observed differences between tests and DOACs, addition of synthetic phospholipids was used.

RESULTS

The dRVVT ratios increased dose dependently for all DOACs, with four of the six tests and the DOAC rivaroxaban having the greatest effect. With one test, the ratios were almost unaffected with increasing DOAC concentration, whereas another test revealed a negative dose dependency for all DOACs. Variable DOAC effects can be explained by different effects on dRVVT screen and confirm clotting time. Adding synthetic phospholipids to samples containing rivaroxaban resulted in greatly reduced screen clotting times and thereby lower calculated dRVVT ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a great variability in the dRVVT test result with different DOACs. The dRVVT ratios are unaffected for some reagents and this can be explained by an equal dose-dependent effect on both screen and confirm assays. The phospholipid type and content of the different reagents may contribute to the observed differences.

Functional lupus anticoagulant testing in a large retrospective cohort of thrombosis patients with direct oral anticoagulants

Functional tests for lupus anticoagulants (LA) as part of a thrombophilia workup are commonly performed in patients under anticoagulant therapy that may interfere with assay results. There is no consensus on how these tests should be assessed in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed data from patients with a history of thrombosis in whom dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT), LA-sensitive aPTT, and solid phase assays for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were performed (n = 3,147, thereof 588 on rivaroxaban, 144 on apixaban, 1,179 on other anticoagulant drugs). The dRVVT ratio was correlated with rivaroxaban (r = 0.30, P < 10^-4) but not with apixaban plasma levels. The LA-sensitive aPTT/aPTT ratio showed no correlation with DOAC levels. Correspondingly, the rate of patients with abnormal dRVVT test was significantly higher (P < 10^-4) under rivaroxaban (88%) than in thrombosis patients without anticoagulant medication (6%), independent from their aPL plasma levels. No isolated positive results of functional LA testing in patients on anticoagulants could be confirmed in repeated testing after discontinuation of the medication (n = 40). These data indicate that rivaroxaban should be discontinued before functional LA testing is performed. However, viable interpretation of these tests appears to be less affected in patients on apixaban.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology position statement on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

BACKGROUND

The term Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) refers to a group of drugs that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. Even though their use for treating different thrombotic or prothrombotic conditions is increasing recently, there is no compelling evidence indicating that those medications are safe in all antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients.

METHODOLOGY

To address this issue, specialists from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding DOACs use in APS to answer the three following questions: (1) potential mechanisms of action of these drugs that could be relevant to APS pathogenesis, (2) DOACs interference on lupus anticoagulant testing, and (3) the efficacy of DOACs in APS.

POSITION STATEMENT

After critically reviewing the relevant evidence, the authors formulated 8 Position Statements about DOACs use in APS.

CONCLUSION

DOACs should not be routinely used in APS patients, especially in those with a high-risk profile (triple positivity to aPL, arterial thrombosis, and recurrent thrombotic events). In addition, DOACs interferes with LA testing, leading to false-positive results in patients investigating APS.

Interindividual Variability of Apixaban Plasma Concentrations: Influence of Clinical and Genetic Factors in a Real-Life Cohort of Atrial Fibrillation Patients

(1) Background: Prescribing apixaban for stroke prevention has significantly increased in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The ABCB₁ genotype can influence apixaban absorption and bioavailability. The aim of the present study was to assess the factors that influence apixaban’s plasma level and to establish if a certain relationship has clinical relevance. (2) Methods: Fifty-three NVAF patients were treated with 5 mg apixaban twice/day (70.0 years, range: 65–77, 60.4% men). Trough and peak plasma concentrations of apixaban were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and ABCB₁ genotyping was performed. (3) Results: Apixaban plasma concentrations varied considerably. They were higher in women than in men (311.2 ng/dL vs. 252.2 ng/dL; p = 0.05) and were lower in patients with heart failure (149.4 ng/dL vs. 304.5 ng/dL; p < 0.01). Creatinine clearance was inversely correlated with the apixaban plasma level (Spearman correlation: r = −0.365; p = 0.007 for trough concentrations). No statistically significant differences between the genotypic groups of ABCB₁ rs1045642 and ABCB₁ rs4148738 were found in the trough or peak apixaban plasma concentrations. (4) Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic parameters are influenced by several clinical factors of which renal function is the major determinant. Plasma concentrations measured in women had higher values than those measured in men, and heart failure was associated with decreased plasma levels of apixaban.

Assessing and Reversing the Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Coagulation

This article presents a focused review of the available tests to assess the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on coagulation and the use of reversal agents in the perioperative setting for practicing anesthesiologists.

[Anticoagulant activity of direct factor Xa inhibitors as a tool to ensure the effectiveness and safety of drugs intake]

The thematic review presents modern solutions using oral anticoagulants with a focus on direct coagulation factor X inhibitors. It contains information about the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of apixaban and rivaroxaban against the background of different drug intake regimens - twice and once per day. There are shown studies of concentration dynamics and the corresponding functional response, measured using the integral method - the thrombin generation test, which is widely used in scientific research to describe hemostatic processes based on an objective quantitative assessment of the thrombin formation - a key coagulation cascade serine protease. The logical relationship between the pharmacodynamics of anticoagulant action and the clinical presentation of the effectiveness and safety of drugs is traced. The review provides links to actual literature and current clinical guidelines.

Standard coagulation assays alone are not sufficient to exclude surgically relevant rivaroxaban plasma concentrations

Background

While mainly larger hospitals have introduced routine anti-Xa assays for rivaroxaban (RXA), these are not readily available to smaller hospitals often relying on routine coagulation tests such as prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of RXA plasma concentration on the standard coagulation tests PT (Quick test and INR) and aPTT in a large group of real-life patients. We further assessed whether normal results of these standard coagulation assays are sufficient to exclude surgically relevant RXA plasma concentration, defined as > 50 mcg/l.

Methods

This retrospective study included all patients between 2012 and 2016 where anti-Xa (calibrated for RXA), PT (Quick test and INR), and/or aPTT were determined from the same sample. PT is expressed as Quick value (% of normal plasma pool). In total, 1027 measurements in 622 patients were eligible for analysis: 752 measurements of 505 patients for Quick/INR and 594 measurements of 417 patients for aPTT.

Results

A moderate correlation of PT/Quick (Pearson's correlation coefficient − 0.59; p < 0.001), INR (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.5; p < 0.001), and aPTT (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.53; p < 0.001) with RXA plasma concentration was observed. However, in 50% of all samples with a normal PT/Quick, in 25% of all samples with a normal INR and in 80% of all samples with a normal aPTT residual RXA plasma concentration was surgically relevant.

Conclusion

Although a moderate correlation of RXA plasma concentration with PT/Quick, INR, and aPTT was observed, standard coagulation assays are not sufficient to exclude surgically relevant RXA plasma concentrations.

Limitations of Specific Coagulation Tests for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Critical Analysis

Background

During treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), coagulation assessment is required before thrombolysis, surgery, and if anticoagulation reversal is evaluated. Limited data support the accuracy of DOAC‐specific coagulation assays around the current safe‐for‐treatment threshold of 30 ng/mL.

Methods and Results

In 481 samples obtained from 96 patients enrolled at a single center, DOAC concentrations were measured using Hemoclot direct thrombin inhibitor assay, Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor assay or ecarin clotting time for dabigatran, chromogenic anti‐Xa assay (AXA) for factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban) and ultraperformance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry as reference. All dabigatran‐specific assays had high sensitivity to concentrations >30 ng/mL, but specificity was lower for Hemoclot direct thrombin inhibitor assay (78.2%) than for Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor assay (98.9%) and ecarin clotting time (94.6%). AXA provided high sensitivity and specificity for rivaroxaban, but low sensitivity for apixaban (73.8%; concentrations up to 82 ng/mL were misclassified as <30 ng/mL). If no DOAC‐specific calibration for AXA is available, results 2‐fold above the upper limit of normal indicate relevant rivaroxaban concentrations. For apixaban, all elevated results should raise suspicion of relevant anticoagulation.

Conclusions

DOAC‐specific tests differ considerably in diagnostic performance for concentrations close to the currently accepted safe‐for‐treatment threshold. Compared with Biophen direct thrombin inhibitor assay and ecarin clotting time, limited specificity of Hemoclot direct thrombin inhibitor assay poses a high risk of unnecessary anticoagulation reversal or treatment delays in patients on dabigatran. While AXA accurately detected rivaroxaban, the impact of low apixaban levels on the assay was weak. Hence, AXA results need to be interpreted with extreme caution when used to assess hemostatic function in patients on apixaban.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02371044, NCT02371070.

Evaluation of biomarkers for monitoring thrombogenic potential of FXaI16L

: A zymogen-like activated factor X variant (FXa) is being developed for treating acute bleeding conditions. Activated factor V is an essential cofactor to FXa for activating prothrombin to thrombin. Thrombi/emboli formation was observed microscopically in FXa toxicity studies in animals. The objective of this research was to evaluate candidate biomarkers for FXa-induced thrombi/emboli formation to inform safety monitoring and dose-escalation decisions in FXa clinical trials. Effects of intravenous FXa administration on platelets, fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), D-dimer, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, thrombin : antithrombin complex, antithrombin, and factor V, and protein C (PC) activities were evaluated in mice, rats, and monkeys. Mice had endogenous factor V activity 10× that of monkeys and were overly sensitive to FXa-induced thrombi/emboli formation. In monkeys, decreases in fibrinogen and prolongation in aPTT and PT emerged as potential biomarkers for impending FXa-induced thrombi/emboli formation, based on association of changes with microscopically observable thrombi/emboli (0-97 thrombi/emboli per monkey). PC decreases, measured by a clot-based assay, were also observed. A similar reduction in PC activity, when measured by clot-based assay, was observed in a phase 1 clinical trial. However, an in-vitro experiment with human plasma spiked with increasing concentrations of FXa indicated dose-dependent FXa-induced interference with clot-based assays and no depletion of PC or S by FXa in non-clot-based assays. Nonclinical biomarker studies identified fibrinogen, aPTT and PT as potential biomarkers for monitoring the clinical safety of FXa. Results of clot-based assays with FXa treatment should be interpreted with caution.

DOAC-Remove abolishes the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on activated protein C resistance testing in real-life venous thromboembolism patients

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may cause false results of activated protein C resistance (APC-R) ratio. DOAC-Remove, a new reagent based on activated carbon, has been designed to eliminate the interference of DOACs on coagulation assays. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the use of DOAC-Remove enables to determine APC-R in patients treated with DOACs.

Methods

We assessed 74 venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients, including 25 on rivaroxaban, 25 on apixaban and 24 taking dabigatran. APC-R was determined using the Russell Viper Venom Time (RVVT)-based clotting test. APC-R and DOAC concentrations were tested at baseline and following DOAC-Remove. Thrombophilia, including factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation was tested.

Results

FVL mutation was found in 20 (27%) patients. The APC-R ratio at baseline was measurable in 43 patients (58.1%), including 20 (80%) on rivaroxaban, 19 (76%) on apixaban and four (16.7%) on dabigatran. In patients with measurable APC-R at baseline, the ratio >2.9 was found in 23 patients (53.5%). In 16 (37.2%) subjects APC-R ratio <1.8 suggested FVL mutation which was genetically confirmed. Four (9.3%) FVL carriers on dabigatran showed negative/equivocal APC-R results. In 11 (14.9%) patients taking rivaroxaban or apixaban, in whom blood was collected 2–5 h since the last dose, we observed unmeasurable APC-R. DOAC-Remove almost completely eliminated all plasma DOACs. After addition of DOAC-Remove all APC-R ratios were measurable. In four FVL carriers on dabigatran with false negative APC-R, DOAC-Remove resulted in APC-R ratios <1.8.

Conclusions

DOAC-Remove effectively reduces DOACs concentration in plasma, which enables FVL testing using APC-R.

The effect of DOAC-Stop on lupus anticoagulant testing in plasma samples of venous thromboembolism patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) cause false positive lupus anticoagulant (LA) results. We assessed the impact of DOAC-Stop, reversing in vitro effects of DOACs, on LA testing in anticoagulated patients.

Methods

We assessed 75 venous thromboembolism patients aged 44.5±14.6 years. Blood samples were collected 2–28 h since intake of DOACs, including 50 patients on rivaroxaban, 20 on dabigatran and five on apixaban. LA testing was performed at baseline and after DOAC-Stop treatment. Positive LA was defined as the normalized (patient/standard plasma clotting time) LA screening and screening (LA1)/confirmation (LA2) ratios exceeding 1.2.

Results

LA diluted Russell’s viper venom time (dRVVT) normalized screening test revealed abnormal results in 73 (97.3%) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-LA in 49 (65.3%) patients. In six (8%) patients, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was diagnosed. dRVVT LA1/LA2 was abnormal in 35 (50.7%) patients taking DOACs. The APTT ratio was normal in all studied subjects. DOAC-Stop completely removed dabigatran and reduced by 98% rivaroxaban and by 92.3% apixaban concentrations (all p<0.05). After DOAC-Stop screening dRVVT remained prolonged in 34 (49.3%) patients (p<0.001), while dRVVT LA1/LA2 was abnormal in six (8.7%) subjects, with no association with DOAC concentrations at baseline and after DOAC-Stop. The APTT-LA screening test remained prolonged in five (7.2%) patients, while the APTT LA1/LA2 ratio was normal in those subjects. DOAC-Stop did not influence LA testing in APS patients.

Conclusions

Application of DOAC-Stop effectively reduced plasma DOAC concentrations leading to appropriate dRVVT results in up to 97% of VTE patients.

Exploring the effect of factor Xa inhibitors on rotational thromboelastometry: a case series of bleeding patients

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the standard for thromboembolic risk management. In cases of major bleeding, trauma, or urgent surgery, accurate monitoring of DOAC activity is desirable; however, there is often no rapid, readily available test. We therefore explored the degree to which DOAC activity correlated with two coagulation assays: rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and a standard coagulation assay in bleeding patients. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who experienced bleeding while on DOAC therapy from 2015 to 2017 at a Level 1 trauma center. ROTEM (EXTEM-clotting time {CT} in seconds), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (in seconds), prothrombin time (PT) (in seconds), DOAC specific drug test (anti-Xa and Hemoclot in ng/mL), and relevant clinical parameters were recorded. Descriptive statistics (median, range) and Spearman correlation coefficients were estimated. Differences between correlations were tested using Williams' t test. Twelve cases were reviewed (13 separate bleeding episodes). Sixteen measurements of DOAC activity, EXTEM-CT, and PT were obtained. The correlations with rivaroxaban activity were 0.96 and 0.86 (p = 0.2062) for PT and EXTEM-CT, respectively. The correlations with apixaban activity were 0.63 and 0.56 (p = 0.7175) for PT and EXTEM-CT, respectively. Analyses were not conducted for dabigatran due to limited data. Although not statistically significant, PT appears to have a higher correlation with direct Xa inhibitor activity than EXTEM-CT. Further research with larger samples is necessary to clarify the differences between ROTEM and standard assays in detecting DOAC activity.

Evaluation of global laboratory methods and establishing on-therapy ranges for monitoring apixaban and rivaroxaban: Experience at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. The aim of this study was to find appropriate methods of monitoring the anticoagulant effects of are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and establish on-therapy ranges using conventional tests.

METHODS

A total of 184 samples were collected from 91 patients receiving DOACs. Concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban in plasma were accessed by an anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay. PT, APTT, antithrombin, D-dimer, dRVVT screen/confirm, FDP, and fibrinogen levels were measured. On-therapy ranges were calculated by substituting previously reported trough plasma concentrations of DOACs.

RESULTS

Anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay-based DOACs levels were 26.0-279.5 (115.9 ± 56.5) ng/mL for apixaban at 2.5 mg BID, 19.9-565.1 (205.3 ± 162.4) ng/mL for apixaban at 5 mg BID, 2.3-395.3 (205.3 ± 162.4) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 15 mg OD, 3.6-494.8 (119.6 ± 95.1) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 20 mg OD, and 9.6-431.4 (140.8 ± 113.6) ng/mL for rivaroxaban at 15 mg BID. PT (%), antithrombin, and dRVVT confirm tests showed good correlation with plasma apixaban levels. Plasma rivaroxaban concentrations were correlated well with PT (sec), PT (%),and dRVVT confirm results. On-therapy ranges established for dRVVT confirm test by linear regression were as follows: 1.32-1.52 for apixaban 2.5 mg BID, 1.12-1.75 for apixaban 5 mg BID, 1.11-1.78 for rivaroxaban 15 mg OD, 1.09-1.64 for rivaroxaban 20 mg OD, and 1.22-1.81 for rivaroxaban 20 mg BID.

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban concentrations were well correlated with PT (%), antithrombin, and dRVVT confirm test. Rivaroxaban concentrations showed good correlation with PT (sec), PT (%), and dRVVT confirm test.

Quantification of apixaban in human plasma using ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

Apixaban, an inhibitor of direct factor Xa, is used for the treatment of venous thromboembolic events or prevention of stroke. Unlike many other anticoagulant agents, it does not need periodic monitoring. However, monitoring is still required to determine the risk of bleeding due to overdose or surgery. Usually, apixaban concentrations are indirectly quantified using an anti-factor Xa assay. However, this method has a relatively narrow analytical concentration range, poor selectivity, and requires an external calibrator. Therefore, the goal of current study was to establish an analytical method for determining plasma levels of apixaban using ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). To this end, apixaban was separated using 2.5 mM ammonium formate (pH 3.0) (A) and 100% methanol containing 0.1% formic acid (B) using the gradient method with a Thermo hypersil GOLD column. The mass detector condition was optimized using the electrospray ionization (ESI) positive mode for apixaban quantification. The developed method showed sufficient linearity (coefficient of determination [r2 ≥ 0.997]) at calibration curve ranges. The percentage (%) changes in accuracy, precision, and all stability tests were within 15% of the nominal concentration. Apixaban concentration in plasma from healthy volunteers was quantified using the developed method. The mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 371.57 ng/mL, and the median time to achieve the Cmax (Tmax) was 4 h after administration of 10 mg apixaban alone. Although the results showed low extraction efficiency (~16%), the reproducibility (% change was within 15% of nominal concentration) was reliable. Therefore, the developed method could be used for clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Testing and monitoring direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significantly improved the care of patients requiring anticoagulation. With similar or better efficacy and safety outcomes and easier use in the outpatient setting compared with the standard-of-care vitamin K antagonists and low molecular weight heparin, DOACs are now endorsed as first-line treatment of indications including prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism. DOACs are easy-to-use oral agents that offer simple dosing and short half-lives, with no need to test levels because of the wide therapeutic window and limited drug-drug interactions. After almost a decade of DOAC use, the question of testing DOAC levels in certain clinical situations has become the focus of debate. Although guidance for using routine coagulation tests is available, these tests are inadequate for optimal care. DOAC-specific tests have been developed but have limited availability in Europe and less availability in the United States. None are licensed. DOAC testing may be useful in the setting of critical clinical situations such as life-threatening bleeding or need for emergent surgery, especially with the availability of DOAC reversal agents. Patients with characteristics that fall outside the normal range may benefit from the guidance that DOAC testing could offer. Obstacles to adopting DOAC testing have been raised, such as test reliability and staffing costs; however, these problems are rapidly being resolved. Further investigation of the role of DOAC testing is needed to explore its full potential and role in clinical practice.

Laboratory measurement of apixaban using anti-factor Xa assays in acute ischemic stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Apixaban is effective and safe for preventing stroke, and its usage has increased exponentially in recent years. However, data concerning the therapeutic range of apixaban is limited. This study determined the trough and peak levels of apixaban-specific anti-factor Xa activity (AFXaA) in acute ischemic stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Korea. The study included 85 patients who received apixaban. Blood samples were taken to measure the trough and peak levels of AFXaA using a chromogenic anti-factor assay, as well as prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). We also reviewed complications such as major bleeding of patients treated with apixaban. In patients given a 5.0-mg apixaban dose, the median trough and peak levels of AFXaA were 104.5 and 202.0 ng/mL. In patients given a 2.5-mg apixaban dose, the median trough and peak AFXaA levels were 76.0 and 151.0 ng/mL. The PT showed a positive correlation with increased AFXaA activity at both levels (Trough R = 0.486, Peak R = 0.592), but the aPTT had no relationship with AFXaA activity at both levels (Trough R = 0.181, Peak R = 0.129). Two cases with intracranial bleeding belonged to the highest AFXaA quartile (Trough, p = 0.176; Peak, p = 0.053). In conclusion, we determined the trough and peak levels of AFXaA in patients with NVAF while being treated with the apixaban in Korea. Our results could be used as a starting point when setting the reference ranges for laboratories using anti-Xa assay. Large-scale studies are needed to establish the reference range for AFXaA in patients with NVAF.

Position Paper on laboratory testing for patients on direct oral anticoagulants. A Consensus Document from the SISET, FCSA, SIBioC and SIPMeL

Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) do not require dose-adjustment on the basis of laboratory test results, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect is useful in special situations. This position paper issued by the Italian Scientific Societies that are mainly involved in the management of patients on DOAC is aimed at providing guidance to care-givers on which tests should be used and the situations in which testing is useful. The guidance is based on the data from the literature so far available and/or on consensus among experts.

Mechanistic Basis for the Differential Effects of Rivaroxaban and Apixaban on Global Tests of Coagulation

Rivaroxaban and apixaban are both small molecules that reversibly inhibit factor Xa. Compared with rivaroxaban, apixaban has minimal effects on the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. To investigate this phenomenon, we used a factor Xa-directed substrate in a buffer system. Although rivaroxaban and apixaban inhibited factor Xa with similar K _i values at equilibrium, kinetic measurements revealed that rivaroxaban inhibited factor Xa up to 4-fold faster than apixaban ( p  < 0.001). Using a discontinuous chromogenic assay to monitor thrombin production by prothrombinase in a purified system, rivaroxaban was 4-fold more potent than apixaban (K _i values of 0.7 ± 0.3 and 2.9 ± 0.5 nM, respectively; p  = 0.02). Likewise, in thrombin generation assays in plasma, rivaroxaban prolonged the lag time and suppressed endogenous thrombin potential to a greater extent than apixaban. To characterize how the two inhibitors differ in recognizing factor Xa, inhibition of prothrombinase was monitored in real-time using a fluorescent probe for thrombin. The data were fit using a mixed-inhibition model and the individual association and dissociation rate constants were determined. The association rates for the binding of rivaroxaban to either free factor Xa or factor Xa incorporated into the prothrombinase complex were 10- and 1,193-fold faster than those for apixaban, respectively, whereas dissociation rates were about 3-fold faster. Collectively, these findings suggest that rivaroxaban and apixaban differ in their capacity to inhibit factor Xa and provide a plausible explanation for the observation that rivaroxaban has a greater effect on global tests of coagulation than apixaban.

Lupus-anticoagulant testing at NOAC trough levels

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC), including rivaroxaban, apixaban or dabigatran, regularly show relevant effects on coagulation tests, making the interpretation of results difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible interferences of NOACs in trough level concentrations in lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. Citrate plasma specimens of 30 healthy volunteers were spiked with rivaroxaban, apixaban or dabigatran in four plasma concentration levels at or below trough NOAC levels. The NOAC concentration was measured using dedicated surrogate concentration tests and a stepwise diagnostic procedure for LA-testing was applied using screening, mixing and confirmatory testing. Results were compared to NOAC-free specimens. Starting with a plasma concentration of 12.5 ng/ml, dabigatran-spiked specimens showed significant prolongations in the lupus anticoagulant-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT-LA) as well as in the Dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT), leading to 43.3% false positives in confirmatory testing in the dRVVT. In contrast, rivaroxaban, beginning with 7.5 ng/ml, exclusively affected dRVVT-based tests. In confirmatory tests, 30.0% of rivaroxaban-spiked specimens showed false positive results. Starting with 18.75 ng/ml apixaban, a significant prolongation of the dRVVT and up to 20.7% false positives in confirmatory tests were found. In contrast to other NOACs tested, apixaban did not present with a dose-dependent increase of the dRVVT ratio. In conclusion, the rate of false positive results in LA-testing is unacceptably high at expected trough levels of NOACs. Even at plasma concentrations below the LLOQ of commercially available surrogate tests, LA testing is best avoided in patients with NOAC therapy.

Pharmacologic Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants are becoming increasingly popular in outpatient use. These medications have lacked specific reversal agents. However, this is changing. The Federal Food and Drug Administration approved idarucizumab for reversal of dabigatran in 2016, and another agent, andexanet alfa, is currently in clinical trials for reversal of rivaroxaban and apixaban. This article examines the efficacy and safety of these emerging reversal agents, as well as other historical agents for reversal of direct oral anticoagulants.

Practical guidance on the use of laboratory testing in the management of bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated a favorable benefit–risk profile in several thromboembolic disorders and are increasingly used in routine clinical practice. A number of real-world studies on DOACs are ongoing, and data published so far have shown broadly similar outcomes to those demonstrated in the respective phase III trials. Despite their beneficial attributes, bleeding risk (as with any other anticoagulants) is often a concern for physicians when prescribing DOACs, particularly in elderly patients, those with significant comorbidities, and other high-risk patient populations. Although the absence of routine coagulation monitoring is an advantage of the DOACs, measuring their anticoagulant effect and/or plasma drug levels may be helpful in certain clinical scenarios to help patient management and improve outcomes. In this paper, practical guidance and recommendations are provided for clinical situations in which the test results may aid clinical decision-making, including patients with life-threatening bleeding events, patients without bleeding but with test results indicating a risk of bleeding, for those patients with a suspected thromboembolism while receiving a DOAC, or prior to patients undergoing elective or urgent surgical procedures. Finally, appropriate monitoring of the DOACs could be of substantial benefit to patients, and there is a high potential for development in this area in the future.

Effects of direct oral anticoagulants on lupus anticoagulant assays in a real-life setting

Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant (LA) is based on prolongation in at least one coagulation assay (diluted Russell’s viper venom time – dRVVT or activated partial thromboplastin time – aPTT), which normalises after addition of phospholipids. Both assays may be influenced by anticoagulants and therefore LA should not be tested during warfarin or heparin treatment. It has been shown (primarily in vitro) that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs – dabigatran [DAB], rivaroxaban [RIV] and apixaban [API]) may also influence LA testing. We tested the effects of DOACs on assays routinely used for the diagnosis of LA in patients treated with these drugs in a real-life setting. Plasma from patients with atrial fibrillation treated with DAB (n=30), RIV (n=20) and API (n=17) and not known to have LA were tested using dRVVT (LA-screen and LA-confirm, Life Diagnostics) and aPTT (PTT-LA, Diagnostica Stago and aPTT Actin FS, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) assays. According to the diagnostics algorithm, dRVVT and aPTT ratios of <1.2 were considered negative, ratios of >1.4 positive, while if the ratios were 1.2–1.4 LA could not be ruled out. Plasma concentrations varied between 8–172 µg/l for DAB, 8–437 µg/l for RIV and 36–178 µg/l for API. LA diagnosis was negative in only eight (27 %) plasma samples from patients treated with DAB, and in five (25 %) and four samples (24 %) from patients treated with RIV and API, respectively. LA Positivity (dRVVT and aPTT ratios >1.4) was found in 5 cases (17 %) among patients treated with DAB, in 10 cases (50 %) treated with RIV and in 7 cases (41 %) treated with API. A concentration-dependent effect of DOACs on dRVVT-based parameters was observed, particularly as regards DAB. At lower concentrations, RIV and API had only minor effects on the confirmatory tests (below 100 µg/l and 70 µg/l, respectively). Our results suggest that a risk of overestimation of LA detection is present in samples from patients treated with DOACs. Therefore, LA testing should not be performed during treatment with DOACs. Prolongation in confirmatory assays may be helpful for the recognition of false positivity, especially as regards DAB.

Comparison of Anti-Xa Activity in Patients Receiving Apixaban or Rivaroxaban

Background: There is no established method for monitoring the anticoagulant effects of apixaban and rivaroxaban. Linear correlation between serum levels and anti-Xa activity has been shown, with r2 ranging from 0.88 to 0.99. However, there are minimal data in patients receiving apixaban 5 mg twice daily or rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily. Objective: To evaluate the anti-Xa activity and serum levels at those doses and compare the trough anti-Xa activity. Methods: This was a single-center prospective study,approved by the institutional review board. Patients on an inappropriate dose or receiving an interacting drug were excluded. Blood samples were drawn 0.5 to 3 hours before a dose for both agents, 2 to 3 hours after an apixaban dose, and 12 to 16 hours after a rivaroxaban dose. Anti-Xa activity and serum levels were determined, and correlation was done via regression analysis. Trough anti-Xa activity was compared using a t-test. Results: The study enrolled 88 patients receiving each drug. The r2 values were 0.79 and 0.87 for apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively. The mean trough anti-Xa activity was 1.79 ± 0.96 IU/mL for apixaban and 1.25 ± 0.88 IU for rivaroxaban ( P < 0.01). The trough sample was drawn a mean of 1.3 and 1.8 hours prior to the next dose for apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively ( P < 0.01). Conclusions: Good correlation was shown between anti-Xa activity and serum levels. The clinical utility of monitoring anti-Xa activity and the significance of the difference in trough anti-Xa activity for these agents remains to be established.

Real-world monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants in clinic and hospitalization settings

Background:

The monitoring of the effects of direct oral anticoagulants may be beneficial during emergencies and adverse events. We aimed to explore direct oral anticoagulant monitoring in “real-world” settings, in which monitoring methods are limited and loading time can be estimated based on only patient reports.

Methods:

In 164 patients, plasma anti-Xa activity was assessed using a STA^®-Liquid Anti-Xa reagent (Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres, France), and prothrombin time was measured using HemosIL^® RecombiPlasTin 2G (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). The loading time was calculated according to the previous dosing time reported by the patient. In the clinic setting, rivaroxaban and apixaban were administered to 103 patients with atrial fibrillation and a blood sample was tested once during a clinic visit. In the hospitalization setting, edoxaban was administered to 61 patients undergoing arthroplasty for prophylaxis of a venous thrombosis and blood samples were tested 3 and 18 h after the last intake.

Results:

Plasma Xa activity in the clinical setting ranged widely (rivaroxaban: 1.1–424.4 ng/mL, apixaban: 15.4–469.2 ng/mL) during the 11.7 ± 7.0 h following the previous dose. The values varied over a wide range (up to a factor of 2) at the same loading time, especially around the peak period. The plasma anti-Xa activity of rivaroxaban and apixaban showed linear correlations with prothrombin time (R² = 0.828 and 0.717, respectively). Edoxaban administration prolonged the prothrombin time by only 1.6 ± 1.1 s from the trough to the peak, to a degree that was negatively correlated with age, but not with plasma creatinine level, creatinine clearance, or body mass index.

Conclusion:

In real-world settings, plasma anti-Xa monitoring should be interpreted considering the wide variations in data, reflecting the variability in patient-reported loading time and interpatient variability.