Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of rVIII-SingleChain in children with severe hemophilia A: results of a multicenter clinical trial

Nothing short of a revolution: Novel extended half-life factor VIII replacement products and non-replacement agents reshape the treatment landscape in hemophilia A

Hemophilia A, an X-linked genetic disorder, is characterized by a deficiency or dysfunction of clotting Factor VIII. The treatment landscape has substantially changed by introducing novel extended half-life factor VIII (EHL-FVIII) replacement therapies such as efanesoctocog Alfa and non-factor replacement therapy such as emicizumab. These agents signal a shift from treatments requiring multiple weekly infusions to advanced therapies with long half-lives, offering superior protection against bleeding and improving patient adherence and quality of life. While EHL-FVIII treatment might lead to inhibitor development in some patients, non-factor replacement therapy carries thrombotic risks. Therefore, ongoing research and the generation of robust clinical evidence remain vital to guide the selection of optimal and cost-effective first-line therapies for hemophilia A patients.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec for the treatment of adult patients with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec is the first gene therapy approved for treatment of adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the results of the clinical trial program of AMT-060 and etranacogene dezaparvovec, outlining the pharmacokinetic, clinical efficacy and safety data. With the entry of etranacogene dezaparvovec into the market, this review summarizes the treatment landscape in hemophilia B and discusses the current unknowns in the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Gene therapy appears to be a feasible option for adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B. Etranacogene dezaparvovec enables most patients to reach stable factor IX (FIX) levels after a single intravenous infusion, eliminating the need for regular prophylaxis; thus, drastically reducing treatment burden and avoiding variable bleeding risk owing to fluctuating FIX activity levels. Efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec has been demonstrated even in the presence of preexisting neutralizing antibodies (up to a titer of 1:678), with a relative low risk of transaminitis and its associated potential loss of transgene expression. However, long-term data are required to ascertain the durability of FIX levels achieved and safety. The cost-effectiveness and adoption of innovative payment models for reimbursement are key in choosing gene therapy over existing treatments.

Relationship between factor VIII levels and bleeding for rFVIII-SingleChain in severe hemophilia A: A repeated time-to-event analysis

Publications on the exposure-effect relationships of factor concentrates for hemophilia treatment are limited, whereas such analyses give insight on treatment efficacy. Our objective was to examine the relationship between the dose, factor VIII (FVIII) levels and bleeding for rFVIII-SingleChain (lonoctocog alfa, Afstyla). Data from persons with severe hemophilia A on rFVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis from three clinical trials were combined. The published rFVIII-SingleChain population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was evaluated and expanded. The probability of bleeding was described with a parametric repeated time-to-event (RTTE) model. Data included 2080 bleeds, 2545 chromogenic stage assay, and 3052 one-stage assay FVIII levels from 241 persons (median age 19 years) followed for median 1090 days. The majority of the bleeds occurred in joints (65%) and the main bleeding reason was trauma (44%). The probability of bleeding decreased during follow-up and a FVIII level of 8.9 IU/dL (95% confidence interval: 6.9-10.9) decreased the bleeding hazard by 50% compared to a situation without FVIII in plasma. Variability in bleeding hazard between persons with similar FVIII levels was large, and the pre-study annual bleeding rate explained part of this variability. When a FVIII trough level of 1 or 3 IU/dL is targeted during prophylaxis, simulations predicted two (90% prediction interval [PI]: 0-17) or one (90% PI: 0-11) bleeds per year, respectively. In conclusion, the developed PK-RTTE model adequately described the relationship between dose, FVIII levels and bleeds for rFVIII-SingleChain. The obtained estimates were in agreement with those published for the FVIII concentrates BAY 81-8973 (octocog alfa) and BAY 94-9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol), indicating similar efficacy to reduce bleeding.

New directions to develop therapies for people with hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The past few decades have seen a tremendous advancement in the management of hemophilia. Whether it is improved methods to attenuate critical viruses, recombinant bioengineering with decreased immunogenicity, extended half-life replacement therapies to mitigate the burden of repeated infusion treatments, novel nonreplacement products to avoid the drawback of inhibitor development with its attractive subcutaneous administration and then the introduction of gene therapy, the management has trodden a long way.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review describes the progress in the treatment of hemophilia over the years. We discuss, in detail, the past and current therapies, their benefits, drawbacks, along with relevant studies leading to approval, efficacy and safety profile, ongoing trials, and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

The technological advances in the treatment of hemophilia with convenient modes of administration and innovative modalities offer a chance for a normal existence of the patients living with this disease. However, it is imperative for clinicians to be aware of the potential adverse effects and the need for further studies to establish causality or chance association of these events with novel agents. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to engage patients and their families in informed decision-making and tailor individual concerns and necessities.

A French Real-World Evidence Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Parameters of rVIII-SingleChain in Patients with Hemophilia A Receiving Prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

 rVIII-SingleChain is a recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) with increased binding affinity to von Willebrand factor compared with other FVIII products. rVIII-SingleChain is indicated for the treatment and prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVES

 To collect real-world evidence data from patients treated with rVIII-SingleChain to confirm the efficacy and safety established in the clinical trial program and carry out a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis.

PATIENTS/METHODS

 This interim analysis includes data, collected between January 2018 - September 2021, from patients treated with rVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis at French Hemophilia Treatment centers. Data on annualized bleeding rates, dosing frequency, and consumption before and after switching to rVIII-SingleChain were recorded. A population PK analysis was also conducted to estimate PK parameters.

RESULTS

 Overall, 43 patients switched to prophylaxis with rVIII-SingleChain either from a previous prophylaxis regimen or from on-demand treatment. Following the switch to rVIII-SingleChain, patients maintained excellent bleed control. After switching to rVIII-SingleChain, most patients maintained or reduced their regimen. Interestingly, a majority of patients treated >2 ×/weekly with a standard half-life FVIII reduced both injection frequency and FVIII consumption with rVIII-SingleChain. A PK analysis revealed a lower clearance of rVIII-SingleChain (1.9 vs. 2.1 dL/h) and a longer half-life both in adolescents/adults (n = 28) and pediatric (n = 6) patients (15.5 and 11.9 hours, respectively vs. 14.5 and 10.3 hours) than previously reported.

CONCLUSIONS

 Patients who switched to rVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis demonstrated excellent bleed control and a reduction in infusion frequency. A population PK analysis revealed improved PK parameters compared with those reported in the clinical trial.

Clinical experience of switching patients with severe hemophilia to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP

OBJECTIVE

Prophylaxis treatment is the current standard of care for patients with severe hemophilia. Factor concentrates with improved pharmacokinetics have offered more options for individualizing treatment. The treatment focus may be on increased protection, aiming for higher trough factor levels or longer dosing intervals to reduce the burden of hemophilia. Both aspects can have long-term effects on joint health. Products, such as rVIII‑SingleChain and rIX-FP have been developed to reduce the treatment burden for patients with hemophilia and optimize prophylactic efficacy. The objective of this report is to provide a summary of the clinical experience of different Hemophilia Treatment Centers in managing the switch to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP in patients with hemophilia.

METHODS

This report summarizes a selection of patient cases presented at the 3rd Alliance for Coagulation Academy Meeting in October 2020. The cases from the participating centers provide examples of the clinical experience in managing patients' switch to rVIII-SingleChain and rIX‑FP, including which types of patients are suitable for switching, and practical steps in managing a switch.

RESULTS

It is important to take into consideration the physical and social fulfillment of the patient when deciding to switch to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP. The physician plays an important role in the motivation of patients as they understand not only the patient's needs but the potential benefits of the new treatment.

CONCLUSION

The selected patient cases reported here demonstrate that patients may wish to switch factor products for a variety of reasons; therefore, it is critical to understand why patients switch and what they expect from switching.

Analysis of pooled real-world data from Germany, Italy, and the United States of rVIII-SingleChain compared with standard- and long-acting FVIII products for prophylaxis of hemophilia A

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate real-world annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), dosing frequency, and factor consumption of four recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products using pooled data from centers in the US, Germany, and Italy.

METHODS

De-identified patient medical chart data were collected from 48 hemophilia treatment centers in the US, Germany, and Italy. Patients included in this analysis had hemophilia A and were treated with rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, octocog alfa, or BAY 81-8973 for ≥12 weeks. Where possible, patient selection considered age and disease severity in order to balance patient groups across products. Summary statistics were presented descriptively by product for dosing frequency, consumption, ABR/annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR), and corresponding percentage of patients with zero bleeds. Logistic regression was performed for patients with zero bleeds or zero spontaneous bleeds (vs. patients with any such bleeds). Generalized linear model regression was performed for ABR, AsBR, and consumption. All regression models included the product variable for comparison as well as additional independent variables for adjustment (age, weight, severity, and country for the consumption model, with the addition of consumption for the bleeding outcomes models).

RESULTS

Overall, 616 patients were included (rVIII-SingleChain, n = 129; rFVIIIFc, n = 159; octocog alfa, n = 181; BAY 81-8973, n = 147). Dosing frequency was ≤2 times a week for 65.9%, 75.5%, 25.4%, and 40.1% of patients treated with rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, octocog alfa, and BAY 81-8973, respectively. ABRs were not significantly different among products, with mean (median) values of 1.1 (0.0), 1.0 (0.0), 1.4 (1.0), and 1.9 (1.0) for rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, octocog alfa, and BAY 81-8973, respectively. The percentage of patients with zero bleeds was comparable between rVIII-SingleChain and rFVIIIFc (59.7% vs. 62.3%; p =.916) and significantly higher for rVIII-SingleChain compared with octocog alfa (p <.001) and BAY 81-8973 (p =.003). Comparison of mean weekly consumption showed: rVIII-SingleChain (83.0 IU/kg/week) vs. rFVIIIFc (96.9; p =.055) and significantly lower for rVIII-SingleChain vs. octocog alfa (108.6; p <.001) and BAY 81-8973 (104.3; p =.001). The median values for weekly consumption were 85.7, 90.1, 100.1, and 98.5 IU/kg/week for rVIII-SingleChain, rFVIIIFc, octocog alfa, and BAY 91-8973, respectively. Similar trends were observed for all outcomes when analyzing the subgroups of patients aged ≥12 years and patients with severe disease (all age and ≥12 years).

CONCLUSIONS

rVIII-SingleChain prophylaxis may provide improved bleed protection, less frequent dosing, and lower consumption compared with standard-acting FVIII products, and comparable protection and consumption to the other long-acting FVIII product, in patients with hemophilia A.

Recombinant single‐chain factor VIII in severe hemophilia: Long‐term safety and efficacy in previously treated patients in the AFFINITY extension study

Background

rVIII‐SingleChain is a recombinant single‐chain factor VIII used to treat people with hemophilia A.

Objectives

The aim of this extension study was to investigate the long‐term safety and efficacy of rVIII‐SingleChain prophylaxis in ≥200 previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A with ≥100 exposure days (EDs).

Methods

In total, 222 patients were enrolled, of which 204 rolled over from prior rVIII‐SingleChain studies. The median age was 21 years (range, 2–65 years), including 155 patients ≥12 years and 67 patients <12 years. Patients continued with their previously assigned dose and regimen, or switched at the investigator’s discretion. Patients were treated for a mean duration of 31 months (range, 1–47 months), the mean ED was 342 (standard deviation, 135.5), and 212 (95.5%) patients achieved >100 EDs. When the study ended, most patients were on either a prophylaxis regimen of 34.9 (17–62) IU/kg, 3×/week (N = 88; 39.6%), or 37.2 (13–65) IU/kg, 2×/week regimen (N = 72; 32.4%).

Results

Hemostatic efficacy was rated excellent or good in 87.1% of assessed bleeds. The median (range) annualized bleeding rate was 1.21 (0.0–42.6), and the annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) was 0.32 (0.0–33.0) for prophylaxis regimens. Median AsBR was similar for patients treated 3×/week and 2×/week (0.31 and 0.30, respectively). Surgical hemostatic efficacy was rated excellent or good in 100% of surgeries. No inhibitors, anaphylactic reactions, or thromboembolic events were reported in PTPs.

Conclusion

These results confirm the safety and efficacy of rVIII‐SingleChain as a long‐term prophylaxis treatment modality for PTPs with severe hemophilia A.

Italian experience with rVIII-single chain: a survey of patients with haemophilia A and their physicians

rVIII-SingleChain is indicated for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A (HA). The safety and efficacy of rVIII-SingleChain have previously been shown in the AFFINITY clinical trial programme. This survey evaluated clinical experience following a switch to rVIII-SingleChain from the perspective of both physicians and patients. A web-based survey (July–September 2019) involving 14 Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) collected data about HA patients who were under treatment with rVIII-SingleChain for ≥ 12 months, as reported by their physicians. In addition, about half of these patients were separately interviewed. Out of 91 patients receiving rVIII-SingleChain in the 14 participating HTCs, 48 had been treated for ≥ 12 months; among those 48, 38% were ≤ 18 years, 37% 19–40 years and 25 % ≥ 41 years; 73% of them had severe HA and 85% were being treated with prophylactic therapy. Twenty-six patients accepted to be separately interviewed: mean age was 30 years; 62% had severe HA and 85% were receiving prophylaxis. Focusing on those patients who were already in prophylaxis with prior FVIII (all but one with recombinant factors), infusion frequency was significantly reduced from 3–2 per week following the switch to rVIII-SingleChain (mean, 2.74 vs. 2.44, respectively; p=0.013), as reported by physicians; the rate of patients needing 3 infusions per week dropped from 74% with previous products to 44% with rFVIII-SingleChain. The annual mean factor consumption was 4740 IU/Kg (median, 4500 IU/Kg; min, 2.215 IU/Kg; max, 7.200 IU/Kg) with prior product and 4320 IU/Kg (median, 4320 IU/Kg; min, 2.215 IU/Kg; max, 6.646 IU/Kg) with rVIII-SingleChain. Both physicians and patients reported a significant reduction in annual total bleeding rates with rVIII-SingleChain compared with prior product (mean 2.15–0.96 and 2.46–0.71 events/year, p = 0.031 and p = 0.018, respectively). Mean satisfaction ratings (from 1; dissatisfied, to 5; very satisfied) for rVIII-SingleChain were quite high for both physicians (4.14, 86% satisfied/very satisfied) and patients (4.18, 86% satisfied/very satisfied). This survey suggested that switching to rVIII-SingleChain allowed patients to reduce their injection frequency without increasing factor consumption or compromising clinical results. Both physicians and patients reported a positive experience with rVIII-SingleChain after 1 year of treatment.

Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms

Mainstay haemophilia treatment, namely intravenous factor replacement, poses several clinical challenges including frequent injections due to the short half-life of recombinant factors, intravenous administration (which is particularly challenging in those with difficult venous access), and the risk of inhibitor development. These impact negatively upon quality of life and treatment compliance, highlighting the need for improved therapies. Several novel pharmacological therapies developed for haemophilia aim to rebalance the clotting cascade and potentially circumvent the aforementioned challenges. These therapies utilise a range of different mechanisms, namely: the extension of the circulating half-life of standard recombinant factors; the mimicking of factor VIII cofactor activity; rebalancing of coagulation through targeting of natural anticoagulants such as antithrombin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor; and inducing the production of endogenous factors with gene therapy. These therapies carry the potential of revolutionising haemophilia treatment by alleviating the current challenges presented by mainstay factor replacement. This review will provide an overview of the key trial findings related to novel therapies based on the mechanisms described above.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Consumption of rVIII-SingleChain Versus Two Recombinant FVIII Products Used for Prophylactic Treatment of Adults/Adolescents with Severe Haemophilia A

Introduction

Given the relatively small number of patients with haemophilia A, head-to-head comparisons between recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products are difficult to conduct. This study compared the efficacy and consumption of rVIII-SingleChain (lonoctocog alfa, AFSTYLA^®) with rAHF-PFM (octocog alfa, Advate^®) and rFVIIIFc (efmoroctocog alfa, Elocta^®), for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated adolescents/adults with severe haemophilia A, through a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

Methods

A systematic literature review identified published clinical trials for rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc. Individual patient data for rVIII-SingleChain were used to match baseline patient characteristics to those from published trials, using an approach similar to propensity score weighting. After matching, annualized bleeding rates (ABR), percentage of patients with zero bleeds, and rFVIII consumption were compared across trial populations.

Results

Published data were identified from two rAHF-PFM trials and one rFVIIIFc trial. rVIII-SingleChain had similar ABR (risk ratio [RR]: 0.74 [0.16; 3.48]; RR: 1.18 [0.85; 1.65]) and percentage of patients with zero bleeds (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34 [0.56; 3.22]; OR: 0.78 [0.47; 1.31]) versus rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc, respectively. Annual rVIII-SingleChain consumption was significantly lower than rAHF-PFM (mean difference: − 1507.66 IU/kg/year [− 2011.71; − 1003.61]) and equivalent to rFVIIIFc (RR: 0.96 [0.62; 1.49]).

Conclusion

Although limited to published information for comparator trials, these results suggest that with an annualized rFVIII consumption comparable to rFVIIIFc, but significantly lower than rAHF-PFM, routine prophylaxis with rVIII-SingleChain is able to maintain a similar ABR and percentage of patients with zero bleeds, attesting to the long-acting nature of rVIII-SingleChain.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01853-0.

It is difficult to directly compare different recombinant FVIII products in head-to-head studies because there are few patients with haemophilia A. This study aimed to indirectly compare the efficacy and consumption of different recombinant FVIII products in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A using published clinical data. A proven method for performing indirect comparisons of products is referred to as a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Using this approach, we were able to compare rVIII-SingleChain with two other recombinant FVIII products (rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc). Our results suggest that annual FVIII consumption with rVIII-SingleChain is comparable to rFVIIIFc, but is significantly lower than rAHF-PFM, while maintaining a similar bleeding rate. These results highlight the long-acting nature of the product.

The availability of new drugs for hemophilia treatment

INTRODUCTION

A number of new FVIII/IX concentrates enriched the portfolio of products available for the treatment of hemophilia A/B patients. Due to the large inter-patient variability, accurate tailoring of the therapy became essential to improve patients' adherence, clinical outcomes, and cost/effectiveness ratio. Recently, non-replacement therapies have taken the limelight and succeeded in decreasing the bleedings of patients.

AREAS COVERED

The PK characteristics, efficacy, and safety of the new rFVIII and rFIX concentrates and of non-replacement therapy, are reported in detail in the published clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Outstanding improvements of rFIX concentrates' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have allowed to reduce the bleedings in hemophilia B patients, in order to increase their adherence to prophylaxis and quality of life. Less significant are the effects of pegylation or Fc fusion on the pharmacokinetics of the new rFVIII concentrates. The new non-replacement therapy is achieving the favor of many treaters and patients, in particular those with Factor VIII inhibitors. Great attention must be paid to the dangerous synergy of APCC and emicizumab, responsible for some fatal events during the clinical trials and compassionate use of this drug. So far, replacement therapy should be the standard of care for hemophilia patients without inhibitors or difficulties in venous access.

Switching patients in the age of long-acting recombinant products?

Introduction: Prophylaxis with factor replacement therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of hemophilia, but this often requires frequent infusions. A number of long-acting factor products have been developed to reduce the burden on patients. Areas covered: This is an overview of information presented at two symposia held at the World Federation of Hemophilia and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis - Scientific and Standardization Committee annual meetings. The pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy data for long-acting recombinant products are reviewed, with a focus on recombinant factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) and rVIII-SingleChain. This overview also provides a guide for managing a patient's switch to long-acting products. Expert opinion: Long-acting products may allow patients to maintain or decrease bleeding rates whilst increasing their dosing interval, which may in turn reduce the burden on patients and caregivers. When switching patients to long-acting products health-care professionals should provide balanced and thorough education to the patient, whilst supporting their emotional well-being. Regimens should address patients' needs and goals but should also be guided by clinical phenotype and pharmacokinetic assessment. Follow-up should assess safety concerns, bleeding rates, joint health and the impact of the regimen on patients' lifestyle.

Turoctocog alfa pegol provides effective management for major and minor surgical procedures in patients across all age groups with severe haemophilia A: Full data set from the pathfinder 3 and 5 phase III trials

INTRODUCTION

Turoctocog alfa pegol is a glycoPEGylated recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) with an extended half-life developed for prophylaxis, treatment of bleeds and perioperative management in patients with haemophilia A.

AIM

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa pegol treatment for major and minor surgeries in the pathfinder 3 and 5 phase III trials.

METHODS

Adults/adolescents aged ≥12 years with severe haemophilia A (FVIII <1%) received perioperative turoctocog alfa pegol treatment planned to achieve FVIII activity levels >80% during major surgery (pathfinder 3). The primary end point was haemostatic efficacy during surgery; secondary end points were blood loss, haemostatic effect postsurgery, consumption, transfusions, safety and health economics. Children (0-11 years) undergoing minor surgeries received 20-75 IU/kg turoctocog alfa pegol at Investigator's discretion (pathfinder 5).

RESULTS

pathfinder 3 included 35 patients undergoing 49 major surgeries. Haemostasis was successful in 47/49 (95.9%) surgeries; two had moderate haemostatic responses. Median (mean) blood loss during major surgery was 75 (322.6) mL. Four bleeds were reported postsurgery; three were successfully treated with turoctocog alfa pegol (one was not evaluated). On the day of surgery, overall mean (median) dose was 75.5 (74.5) IU/kg and mean (median) number of doses was 1.7 (2.0). Five procedures required 11 transfusions on the day of surgery or days 1-6. No safety concerns or inhibitors were identified. Forty-five minor surgeries in 23 children were performed without complications.

CONCLUSION

Turoctocog alfa pegol was effective for perioperative haemostatic management of major and minor surgeries in patients across age groups with severe haemophilia A.

Assessing prophylactic use and clinical outcomes in hemophilia A patients treated with rVIII-SingleChain and other common rFVIII products in Germany

Objective

To evaluate real‐world outcomes with rVIII‐SingleChain and other commonly used recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products.

Methods

Hemophilia treatment centers in Germany (n = 21) contributed patient chart data. Inclusion criteria were prophylactic treatment with one of five rFVIII products for ≥8 weeks.

Results

Male patients (n = 225) were included: rVIII‐SingleChain (n = 40), rFVIIIFc (n = 47), octocog alfa (rFVIII; n = 58), octocog alfa (BAY 81‐8973; n = 40), or moroctocog alfa (n = 40). In patients with severe disease (n = 76), 66.6%, 70.0%, 20.0%, 7.7%, and 27.3% were dosed ≤2×/week, respectively. Irrespective of dosing frequency, mean annualized bleed rates (ABRs)/annualized spontaneous bleed rates (AsBRs) were 0.3/0.1, 0.8/0.4, 1.1/0.5, 1.5/0.8, and 1.4/0.6, and mean FVIII consumption (IU/kg/week) was 83.2, 97.2, 92.5, 104.0, and 102.1, respectively. Results for all patients were similar. Of the patients on prophylaxis with prior therapy and after switching to rVIII‐SingleChain (n = 21), mean ABR/AsBRs were 0.7/0.3 and 0.2/0.0, respectively. After switching to rVIII‐SingleChain, mean FVIII consumption reduced (109.4 vs 74.5 IU/kg/week), and percentage of patients dosed ≤2×/week increased (0% to 71.4%).

Conclusions

rVIII‐SingleChain prophylaxis provides excellent bleeding protection, with potentially lowest factor consumption among the products assessed. Patients who switched to rVIII‐SingleChain prophylaxis reduced dosing frequency and consumption compared with prior treatment, with similar or potentially lower bleeding rates.

Extended half-life recombinant products in haemophilia clinical practice - Expectations, opportunities and challenges

Extended half-life (EHL) products have shown robust efficacy in clinical trials, whilst allowing for less intense treatment regimens when compared with standard half-life products. Regimen optimisation with EHL products could lead to further improvements in bleeding rates, quality of life and reductions in treatment burden. Patients now expect good efficacy, a lower treatment burden and equivalent safety when compared with standard half-life products. As our knowledge base grows these expectations have evolved and targeting an annualised bleeding rate of zero has become a more realistic clinical goal. Personalised prophylaxis can help patients achieve these goals. However, a number of challenges still remain, including cost, challenges in predicting outcomes for patients and differences in patients' and clinicians' expectations. When switching a patient, comprehensive patient care can reduce the impact of these issues. This review presents in brief the protein therapeutics with an extended half-life, including key trial results, challenges of chronic care that impact on patients' outcomes and how the modified proteins might help address some of these issues. In addition, practical steps for managing the switch to EHL products are presented.

Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factors: A New Era in the Management of Hemophilia Patients

Despite effective factor replacement and various treatment schedules, there remain several challenges and unmet needs in the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia limiting its adoption and thereby posing an increased risk of spontaneous bleeding. In this regard, extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) and factor IX (rFIX) products promise optimal prophylaxis by decreasing the dose frequency, increasing the compliance, and improving the quality of life without compromising safety and efficacy. EHL products might lead to higher trough levels without increasing infusion frequency, or could facilitate the ability to maintain trough levels while reducing infusion frequency. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the rationale for developing EHL coagulation factors and their utility in the management of hemophilia, with special emphasis on optimal techniques for half-life extension and criteria for defining EHL coagulation factors, as well as indications, efficacy, and safety issues of the currently available EHL-rFVIII and EHL-rFIX products. Potential impacts of these factors on quality of life, health economics, and immune tolerance treatment will also be discussed alongside the challenges in pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis and difficulties in monitoring the EHL products with laboratory assays.

Extended Half-Life Factor VIII and Factor IX Preparations

In the last couple of years, several extended half-life factor VIII and factor IX preparations were intensively studied and gained approval. In order to extend half-lives, techniques like fusion to protein conjugates (Fc part of IgG₁ or albumin), chemical modification (PEGylation), and protein sequence modification are implemented. With these techniques, it is possible to extend half-lives of factor IX products 4- to 6- fold, while half-life extension of factor VIII products is limited to 1.5- to 2-fold due to their interaction with von Willebrand factor. Nevertheless, both extended half-life factor VIII and IX products have improved and facilitated prophylactic factor replacement therapy in hemophilia A and B, respectively. Extended half-life factor concentrates pose challenges to coagulation laboratories because accurate therapy monitoring is not possible with all factor activity assays currently used.

Novel therapies and current clinical progress in hemophilia A

The evolution of hemophilia treatment and care is a fascinating one but has been fraught with many challenges at every turn. Over the last 50 years or so patients with hemophilia and providers have witnessed great advances in the treatment of this disease. With these advances, there has been a dramatic decrease in the mortality and morbidity associated with hemophilia. Even with the remarkable advancements in treatment, however, new and old challenges continue to plague the hemophilia community. The cost of factor replacement and the frequency of infusions, especially in patients with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis, remains a significant challenge for this population. Other challenges include obtaining reliable venous access, especially in younger patients, and the development of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). The development of extended half-life products, a bispecific antibody which mimics the coagulation function of factor VIII (FVIII) and inhibition of anticoagulation proteins such as antithrombin with antibodies, aptamers or RNA interference technology have offered novel therapeutic approaches to overcome some of these existing challenges. Additionally, ongoing gene therapy research offers a way to possibly cure hemophilia. These novel treatment tools in conjunction with the establishment of an increasing number of comprehensive hemophilia centers and worldwide advocacy efforts have continued to push the progress of hemophilia care to new frontiers. This review highlights and summarizes these novel therapeutic approaches and the current clinical progress of hemophilia A.

Lonoctocog alfa (rVIII-SingleChain) for the treatment of haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The administration of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates on-demand or on long-term prophylaxis is the effective and safe standard of care of patients with hemophilia A (HA). Development of neutralizing antibodies against exogenous FVIII and the short half-life of the current available products remain major challenges. There is currently a great interest towards newer FVIII products with the goal of reducing the inhibitor risk and increasing the half-life. Area covered: In this review, the authors describe the efficacy and safety of rVIII-SingleChain (Lonoctocog alfa), the first and only single chain recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) molecule developed for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in HA patients. The pre-clinical and clinical studies of rVIII-SingleChain as well as the results of the AFFINITY trial program in previously treated patients both adults and pediatric are presented and discussed. Expert opinion: The results from PTP studies document the efficacy and safety profile of the rVIII-SingleChain. However, even if rFVIII-SingleChain presents advantageous pharmacokinetic features compared to conventional rFVIII, it should not be considered as an EHL-FVIII while its immunogenicity is currently being studied in PUPs. The slightly better PK profile of rFVIII-SingleChain could however allow a small number of selected patients to be treated with a less intensive regimen.

Lonoctocog Alfa: A Review in Haemophilia A

Lonoctocog alfa (rVIII-SingleChain; Afstyla^®) is a novel single-chain recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) molecule, with a truncated B-domain and the heavy and light chains covalently linked to form a stable and homogenous drug that binds with high affinity to von Willebrand factor (VWF). Intravenous lonoctocog alfa is approved for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A in several countries worldwide. In two pivotal, multicentre trials, lonoctocog alfa was effective in the treatment of bleeding episodes and as prophylaxis, including for perioperative management in adults, adolescents and children. In terms of haemostatic efficacy in controlling bleeding episodes, overall treatment and investigator-assessed success rates were high across all age groups, with the majority of these bleeds controlled with a single injection of lonoctocog alfa. Low median spontaneous, overall and traumatic annualized bleeding rates were evident with prophylactic lonoctocog alfa regimens in both trials. Lonoctocog alfa was generally well-tolerated, with very low rates of injection-site reactions. No previously treated patient experienced an anaphylactic reaction or developed an inhibitor. In conclusion, lonoctocog alfa is an effective and generally well-tolerated alternative to conventional FVIII products for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding, including in the surgical setting, in adults, adolescents and children with haemophilia A.