Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel

Systemic Therapy Combined with Locoregional Therapy in Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Recent advances in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma are remarkable. The treatment goal for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is to prolong survival, while for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, it is to achieve a cancer-free and drug-free status. Patients unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization may benefit from prior systemic therapy with lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. The TACTICS-L trial, a prospective phase II trial, demonstrated favorable progression-free and overall survival by lenvatinib-transarterial chemoembolization sequential therapy. The REPLACEMENT trial, a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase II trial, confirmed combination immunotherapy efficacy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumabin a population exceeding up-to-seven criteria. In a proof-of-concept study, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus curative therapy showed a 35% complete response rate and 23% drug-free status in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a tumor burden exceeding up-to-seven criteria.

Effectiveness of sorafenib in treating intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to transarterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND

Switching to systemic therapy after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness is more inclined to preserve liver function and decrease disease progression. Hence, we conducted a comparison between the advantages of sorafenib therapy and the continuation of TACE in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who developed TACE refractoriness.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort work involved 1,200 patients with HCC who received TACE therapy at our institution between January 2018 and December 2022. Out of these, a total of 436 participants were determined to be resistant to TACE treatment throughout their clinical progression. Out of them, 271 were finally included and categorized into two groups: (1) patients who shifted from TACE to sorafenib, and (2) patients who maintained TACE treatment. The study assessed the overall survival (OS) and time to disease progression (TTDP) of patients who were resistant to TACE, comparing both groups based on when they achieved Child-Pugh C or acquired advanced-stage HCC.

RESULTS

Following confirmation of refractoriness to TACE therapy, 163 opted to continue with TACE (TACE group), whereas 108 shifted to sorafenib treatment (sorafenib group). The median TTDP was 23.36 months, while the median OS was 25.3 months, in the sorafenib group, and 11.6 and 14.2 months, correspondingly, in the TACE group (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Switching to sorafenib treatment significantly improved OS and TTDP in patients with intermediate-stage HCC who were refractory to TACE. These finding highlights sorafenib's potential as an effective alternative for managing disease progression in patients unresponsive to TACE, offering a valuable treatment option in this challenging clinical scenario.

Predicting Survival Using Whole-Liver MRI Radiomics in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After TACE Refractoriness

PURPOSE

To develop a model based on whole-liver radiomics features of pre-treatment enhanced MRI for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing continued transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after TACE-resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 111 TACE-resistant HCC patients between January 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively collected. At a ratio of 7:3, patients were randomly assigned to developing and validation cohorts. The whole-liver were manually segmented, and the radiomics signature was extracted. The tumor and liver radiomics score (TLrad-score) was calculated. Models were trained by machine learning algorithms and their predictive efficacies were compared.

RESULTS

Tumor stage, tumor burden, body mass index, alpha-fetoprotein, and vascular invasion were revealed as independent risk factors for survival. The model trained by Random Forest algorithms based on tumor burden, whole-liver radiomics signature, and clinical features had the highest predictive efficacy, with c-index values of 0.85 and 0.80 and areas under the ROC curve of 0.96 and 0.83 in the developing cohort and validation cohort, respectively. In the high-rad-score group (TLrad-score > - 0.34), the median overall survival (mOS) was significantly shorter than in the low-rad-score group (17 m vs. 37 m, p < 0.001). A shorter mOS was observed in patients with high tumor burden compared to those with low tumor burden (14 m vs. 29 m, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The combined radiomics model from whole-liver signatures may effectively predict survival for HCC patients continuing TACE after TACE refractoriness. The TLrad-score and tumor burden are potential prognostic markers for TACE therapy following TACE-resistance.

A Novel Nomogram to Predict Prognosis in Elderly Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients After Ablation Therapy

Purpose

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant form of primary liver cancer. Early diagnosis is crucial for improving prognosis. Elderly HCC patients often have underlying liver diseases such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis, leading to impaired liver function and suboptimal liver reserve. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has rapidly become one of the most important methods for treating early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (EHCC) due to its advantages, including minimal trauma, short operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, quick postoperative recovery, cost-effectiveness, and few postoperative-complications. However, the prognostic model for early recurrence after local ablation in elderly EHCC patients has not been widely evaluated. We have developed a prognostic model for the recurrence of local RFA in elderly EHCC patients. This is expected to provide a new early warning system for preventing early recurrence in elderly EHCC patients, prolonging patient's life, and improving overall quality of life.

Methods

In this study, we included 661 EHCC patients who underwent local ablation, dividing them into a Primary cohort and a Validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. We characterized the cohorts and utilized the primary cohort to develop a prognostic nomogram model for recurrence after local ablation in elderly EHCC patients. Additionally, the validation cohort was used to assess the potential of the nomogram as a non-invasive biomarker for post-ablation recurrence in EHCC.

Results

The user-friendly nomogram incorporates common clinical variables including gender, BCLC stage, tumor number, tumor size, red blood cell (RBC), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and prothrombin time activity (PTA). The nomogram constructed using the identified seven variables exhibits robust discriminatory capabilities, favorable predictive performance, and noteworthy clinical utility.

Conclusion

We developed a user-friendly nomogram based on the BCLC stage classification, which may provide prognostic assessments for elderly EHCC patients at 1, 3, and 5 years post-RFA.

ASARA, a prediction model based on Child-Pugh class in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND

Due to the high heterogeneity among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), the prognosis of patients varies significantly. The decision-making on the initiation and/or repetition of TACE under different liver functions is a matter of concern in clinical practice. Thus, we aimed to develop a prediction model for TACE candidates using risk stratification based on varied liver function.

METHODS

A total of 222 unresectable HCC patients who underwent TACE as their only treatment were included in this study. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to select the independent risk factors and establish a predictive model for the overall survival (OS). The model was validated in patients with different Child-Pugh class and compared to previous TACE scoring systems.

RESULTS

The five independent risk factors, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, maximal tumor size, the increase of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade score, tumor response, and the increase of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), were used to build a prognostic model (ASARA). In the training and validation cohorts, the OS of patients with ASARA score ≤ 2 was significantly higher than that of patients with ASARA score > 2 (P < 0.001, P = 0.006, respectively). The ASARA model and its modified version "AS(ARA)" can effectively distinguish the OS (P < 0.001, P = 0.004) between patients with Child-Pugh class A and B, and the C-index was 0.687 and 0.706, respectively. For repeated TACE, the ASARA model was superior to Assessment for Retreatment with TACE (ART) and ALBI grade, maximal tumor size, AFP, and tumor response (ASAR) among Child-Pugh class A patients. For the first TACE, the performance of AS(ARA) was better than that of modified hepatoma arterial-embolization prognostic (mHAP), mHAP3, and ASA(R) models among Child-Pugh class B patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASARA scoring system is valuable in the decision-making of TACE repetition for HCC patients, especially Child-Pugh class A patients. The modified AS(ARA) can be used to screen the ideal candidate for TACE initiation in Child-Pugh class B patients with poor liver function.

Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer Recommendation Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Globally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer. The prevalence of this pathology, which has been on the rise in the last 30 years, has been predicted to continue increasing. HCC is the most common cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Egypt and is also the most common cancer in males. Chronic liver diseases, including chronic hepatitis C, which is a primary health concern in Egypt, are considered major risk factors for HCC. However, HCC surveillance is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and liver cirrhosis; those above 40 with HBV but without cirrhosis; individuals with hepatitis D co-infection or a family history of HCC; and Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients exhibiting significant fibrosis or cirrhosis. Several international guidelines aid physicians in the management of HCC. However, the availability and cost of diagnostic modalities and treatment options vary from one country to another. Therefore, the current guidelines aim to standardize the management of HCC in Egypt. The recommendations presented in this report represent the current management strategy at HCC treatment centers in Egypt. Recommendations were developed by an expert panel consisting of hepatologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, pathologists, and radiologists working under the umbrella of the Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer. The recommendations, which are based on the currently available local diagnostic aids and treatments in the country, include recommendations for future prospects.

Fatal acute-on-chronic liver failure following camrelizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with HBsAg seroclearance: a case report and literature review

In the last few years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become major therapeutic agents for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, immunotherapy can activate hepatitis B virus (HBV), and immune clearance may lead to liver failure and even life-threatening conditions. Here we report a case of HCC with HBV-related cirrhosis that caused severe liver injury and rapidly progressed to fatal acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) after only once application of camrelizumab; the patient underwent serological conversion of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) with liver injury. The patient's condition progressed rapidly. We added corticosteroids and applied plasma dialysis, along with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) to control HBV. However, the patient eventually died of liver failure. To our knowledge, there are few reports of HBsAg clearance due to ICIs accompanied by fatal acute-on-chronic liver failure shortly after ICIs initiation. These results suggest that ICIs can cause fatal liver injury in a short term; in patients with chronic HBV infection, ICIs use may promote serological conversion of HBsAg.

Breakthroughs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapies

Several breakthroughs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy across tumor stages provide hope to improve its dismal prognosis. Although surgical and local ablative therapies have few significant changes in technique, an improved understanding of tumor biology has facilitated increase numbers of patients who are now eligible to undergo curative-intent procedures. Most notably, acceptable post-transplant outcomes can be achieved in well selected patients whose tumors are downstaged into Milan Criteria. Adjuvant therapy in patients at high risk of recurrence also significantly improves recurrence-free survival after resection or ablation. For patients with liver-localized disease who are not eligible for curative-intent procedures, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was historically the treatment modality of choice, regardless of tumor burden; however, there is now increased recognition of patients who are "TACE unsuitable" and may be better treated with systemic therapy. The greatest evolution in HCC treatment options has occurred with systemic therapy, where several new agents are now available in the first- and second-line setting, including immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations. Objective responses are observed in approximately 30% of patients and median survival is approaching 2 years. The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors has renewed interest in combination therapies for earlier tumor stages, with several phase III trials ongoing. Considering increasing complexities of HCC care, requiring decisions between therapies delivered by different providers, multidisciplinary care is critical and is associated with improved clinical outcomes. In this review, we detail major breakthroughs in HCC therapy, how these breakthroughs can be applied in clinical practice, and remaining areas in need of further research.

Multidisciplinary Taiwan consensus for the use of conventional TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment

Developed in early 1980s, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with Lipiodol was adopted globally after large-scale randomized control trials and meta-analyses proving its effectiveness were completed. Also known as "conventional TACE" (cTACE), TACE is currently the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and delivers both ischemic and cytotoxic effects to targeted tumors. Although new technology and clinical studies have contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of when and how to apply this widely-adopted therapeutic modality, some of these new findings and techniques have yet to be incorporated into a guideline appropriate for Taiwan. In addition, differences in the underlying liver pathologies and treatment practices for transcatheter embolization between Taiwan and other Asian or Western populations have not been adequately addressed, with significant variations in the cTACE protocols adopted in different parts of the world. These mainly revolve around the amount and type of chemotherapeutic agents used, the type of embolic materials, reliance on Lipiodol, and the degree of selectiveness in catheter positioning. Subsequently, interpreting and comparing results obtained from different centers in a systematic fashion remain difficult, even for experienced practitioners. To address these concerns, we convened a panel of experts specializing in different aspects of HCC treatment to devise modernized recommendations that reflect recent clinical experiences, as well as cTACE protocols which are tailored for use in Taiwan. The conclusions of this expert panel are described herein.

Local Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Role of MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver tumor, with a continually rising incidence. The curative treatment for HCC is surgical resection or liver transplantation; however, only a small portion of patients are eligible due to local tumor burden or underlying liver dysfunction. Most HCC patients receive nonsurgical liver-directed therapies (LDTs), including thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Stereotactic ablative body radiation (SABR) is a specific type of EBRT that can precisely deliver a high dose of radiation to ablate tumor cells using a small number of treatments (or fractions, typically 5 or less). With onboard MRI imaging, MRI-guided SABR can improve therapeutic dose while minimizing normal tissue exposure. In the current review, we discuss different LDTs and compare them with EBRT, specifically SABR. The emerging MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy has been reviewed, highlighting its advantages and potential role in HCC management.

Clinical consensus statement: Establishing the roles of locoregional and systemic therapies for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in Canada

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and approximately one-third of patients present with intermediate-stage disease. The treatment landscape of intermediate-stage HCC is rapidly evolving due to developments in local, locoregional and systemic therapies. Treatment recommendations focused on this heterogenous disease stage and that take into account the Canadian reality are lacking. To address this gap, a pan-Canadian group of experts in hepatology, transplant, surgery, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, interventional radiology, and medical oncology came together to develop consensus recommendations on management of intermediate-stage HCC relevant to the Canadian context.

METHODS

A modified Delphi framework was used to develop consensus statements with strengths of recommendation and supporting levels of evidence graded using the AHA/ACC classification system. Tentative consensus statements were drafted based on a systematic search and expert input in a series of iterative feedback cycles and were then circulated via online survey to assess the level of agreement.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

The pre-defined ratification threshold of 80 % agreement was reached for all statements in the areas of multidisciplinary treatment (n = 4), intra-arterial therapy (n = 14), biologics (n = 5), radiation therapy (n = 3), surgical resection and transplantation (n = 7), and percutaneous ablative therapy (n = 4). These generally reflected an expansion in treatment options due to developments in previously established or emergent techniques, introduction of new and more active therapies and increased therapeutic flexibility. These developments have allowed for greater treatment tailoring and personalization as well as a paradigm shift toward strategies with curative intent in a wider range of disease settings.

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Tumor Response and Survival Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Failed Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization: Repeat or Switch Treatment?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess treatment responses and evaluate survival outcomes between responders and non-responders after each transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) session using the 3D quantitative criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (qEASL) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 94 consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging before and after TACE were retrospectively included. Volumetric tumor enhancement (qEASL) was expressed in cubic centimeters (cm³). The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) for the non-/responders.

RESULTS

In total, 28 (29.8%) patients showed a response after the first TACE. These responders demonstrated a clear trend toward longer OS compared with the non-responders (36.7 vs. 21.5 months, p = 0.071). Of the 43 initial non-responders who underwent a second TACE within 3 months and had complete follow-up imaging, 15/43 (34.9%) achieved a response, and their median OS was significantly longer than that of the 28 non-responders to the second TACE (47.8 vs. 13.6 months, p = 0.01). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in OS between the 28 patients who achieved a response after the first TACE and the 15 initial non-responders who achieved a response after the second TACE (36.7 vs. 47.8 months, p = 0.701). The difference in OS between the responders and non-responders after the third TACE was not significant (11.4 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.986).

CONCLUSION

Our study quantitatively demonstrated that a second TACE can be beneficial in terms of tumor response and survival for HCC patients who do not initially respond to TACE.

Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Why, When, How?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy. It is principally associated with liver cirrhosis and chronic liver disease. The major risk factors for the development of HCC include viral infections (HBV, HCV), alcoholic liver disease (ALD,) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The optimal treatment choice is dictated by multiple variables such as tumor burden, liver function, and patient's health status. Surgical resection, transplantation, ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and systemic therapy are potentially useful treatment strategies. TACE is considered the first-line treatment for patients with intermediate stage HCC. The purpose of this review was to assess the indications, the optimal treatment schedule, the technical factors associated with TACE, and the overall application of TACE as a personalized treatment for HCC.

Survival and Outcome in Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma (>5 cm)

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to study the outcome and survival of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving drug-eluting beads (DEBs) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In addition, tumor morphologies were correlated with the response and survival to analyze the association of morphology with the outcome.

METHODS

Patients with large HCC (>5 cm) who underwent DEB-TACE for palliation were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were assessed for objective response (OR) and overall survival (OS), which was calculated from the first session of DEB-TACE to the last follow-up/death. OR and OS were calculated for the entire study group and were compared among the subgroups consisting of solitary versus multifocal HCC, unilobar versus bilobar disease, well-defined versus ill-defined HCC, and HCC with homogeneous enhancement versus HCC with heterogeneous enhancement.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven DEB-TACE procedures were performed in 25 patients (average: 2.7 ± 1.4 sessions per patient). The mean lesion size was 9.9 ± 4.5 cm. Of 25 patients, 13 (52%) had multifocal HCC. Unilobar disease was seen in 15 patients (60%). The mean duration of follow-up was 24.4 months. OR at 6 and 12 months were 56% and 48%, respectively, with well-defined lesions showing better OR. The median OS was 28 months (95% confidence interval, 12.3-43.6). OS rate at 12 and 24 months was 92% and 57%, respectively. OS was seen to be superior in well-defined HCC and unilobar disease.

CONCLUSION

In this study, DEB-TACE has shown to have a good response in patients having large/multifocal HCC with preserved liver functions. Well-defined HCC and unilobar disease have a better response and survival.

Clinical practice of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: consensus statement from an international expert panel of International Society of Multidisciplinary Interventional Oncology (ISMIO)

IMPORTANCE

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been associated with a wide range of practice variations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between the East and the West. This considerable ambiguity may lead to the heterogeneous quality in treatment and have a negative impact on the role of TACE in the overall multidisciplinary HCC treatment system.

OBJECTIVE

It may be a good start to establish a guideline worldwide to have this consensus from experts who represent east and west, although it does not cover all aspects of TACE.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

An international expert panel on TACE is convened to cluster the expert's opinions and summary a standard consensus. This panel committee consist of leading physicians in TACE on HCC from USA, France, Japan, Singapore, Korea, China, and so on. The first-round face-to-face consensus meeting was held during in Nanjing, China in October 2019. The second-round conference for revision of the consensus was held during the Annual Meeting of Chinese College of Interventionalists in August 2020 by a hybrid format of a Webinar and roundtable meeting. After several on-line revisions, the final manuscript was approved by all members of the panel in June 2021.

FINDINGS

The consensus statements were organized into the following categories: patients' selection, performing the procedure, TACE outcomes, repeat TACE, TACE failure/refractory, and TACE-based combination treatments.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE FOR REVIEWS

More and more evidences have showed the better outcomes with strategy of combined TACE with other local therapies such as ablations. The most-recently developing strategy of combined TACE with PD-1/PD-L1 plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) agents has shined a light to the HCC patients, especially to those with high risk of tumor recurrence after treatment or TACE failure/refractory.

Therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: overview, clinical indications, and comparative outcome evaluation. Part two: noncurative intention

Locoregional therapies can be offered to hepatocellular carcinoma patients as a bridge to transplant, to downstage disease burden for transplant eligibility, or for disease control to prolong survival. Systemic therapies also play a large role in HCC treatment, occasionally in conjunction with other methods. This manuscript reviews the various treatment options for HCC with a historically noncurative intent.

Progression After Molecular Targeted Agents: Hepatic Arterial Changes and Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this study was to determine changes in the hepatic arteries after treatment with a molecular targeted agent (MTA), and evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a post-MTA treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The cases of 33 patients with intermediate HCC treated with MTA and TACE were studied retrospectively. The hepatic arteries, and the safety and efficacy of TACE were evaluated before and after MTA treatment.

RESULTS

Following long-term MTA treatment, the diameters of hepatic arteries decreased significantly, while there was no difference in the diameters of the splenic artery or the portal vein. No significant adverse events were observed due to TACE after MTA; however, the therapeutic effect of TACE was limited after MTA treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the diameters of hepatic arteries were significantly smaller than those before MTA induction, suggesting ischemic effects and tumor vessel "normalization" by MTA treatment. Although TACE can be performed as a post-MTA treatment without lowering the hepatic reserve or causing serious complications, its therapeutic effect is limited.

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: JSH Consensus Statements and Recommendations 2021 Update

The Clinical Practice Manual for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was published based on evidence confirmed by the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma along with consensus opinion among a Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) expert panel on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines are based on original articles with extremely high levels of evidence, expert opinions on HCC management in clinical practice or consensus on newly developed treatments are not included. However, the practice manual incorporates the literature based on clinical data, expert opinion, and real-world clinical practice currently conducted in Japan to facilitate its use by clinicians. Alongside each revision of the JSH Guidelines, we issued an update to the manual, with the first edition of the manual published in 2007, the second edition in 2010, the third edition in 2015, and the fourth edition in 2020, which includes the 2017 edition of the JSH Guideline. This article is an excerpt from the fourth edition of the HCC Clinical Practice Manual focusing on pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of HCC. It is designed as a practical manual different from the latest version of the JSH Clinical Practice Guidelines. This practice manual was written by an expert panel from the JSH, with emphasis on the consensus statements and recommendations for the management of HCC proposed by the JSH expert panel. In this article, we included newly developed clinical practices that are relatively common among Japanese experts in this field, although all of their statements are not associated with a high level of evidence, but these practices are likely to be incorporated into guidelines in the future. To write this article, coauthors from different institutions drafted the content and then critically reviewed each other's work. The revised content was then critically reviewed by the Board of Directors and the Planning and Public Relations Committee of JSH before publication to confirm the consensus statements and recommendations. The consensus statements and recommendations presented in this report represent measures actually being conducted at the highest-level HCC treatment centers in Japan. We hope this article provides insight into the actual situation of HCC practice in Japan, thereby affecting the global practice pattern in the management of HCC.

Lower Serum Sodium Levels Are Associated with the Therapeutic Effect of Sorafenib on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although the serum sodium level has been reported to be a prognostic and predictive marker for the therapeutic effects of lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy, the serum sodium level has not been investigated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with sorafenib. The aim of our analysis was to assess the prognostic role of serum sodium levels in these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 341 HCC patients treated with sorafenib between 2009 and 2012 in our hospital and other related institutions.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 72 years (44-88), and 148 patients (83%) were male. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.9 months, and the median time to progression (TTP) was 3.1 months. Hyponatremia (hazard ratio (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.52), a lower sodium level (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07-2.80), and a high level of α-fetoprotein (AFP) (≥ 200 ng/mL) (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.26-2.52) were independent prognostic factors for TTP. We also categorized the patients into three groups according to serum sodium and AFP levels: Group A (n = 39) (serum sodium > 140 mEq/L, AFP < 200 ng/mL), Group C (n = 58) (serum sodium ≤ 140 mEq/L, AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL), and Group B (n = 81) (other patients). Significantly longer TTP and OS were observed in the following order: Groups A, C, and B.

CONCLUSION

Serum sodium levels are associated with the effectiveness of sorafenib. The serum sodium level can predict the therapeutic effect of sorafenib in advanced HCC patients.

Management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization failure: Retreatment or switching to systemic therapy?

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter Arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line option for the intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Guidelines do not define the number of TACE sessions to be repeated before stopping treatment and switching to sorafenib.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 76 patients aged ≥65 years who were treated by multiple TACE sessions (re-TACE group; N = 36 patients) or one TACE session followed by sorafenib (TACE/Sorafenib group; N = 40 patients). The primary outcome was the overall survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test).

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 320 days (range: 70-420 days) in re-TACE subgroup and 285 days (range: 50-368 days) in TACE/Sorafenib subgroup without significant differences between the two groups (log-rank test P = .72; HR = 0.87; 95% IC 0.41-1.87). The survival rate at one year was 43.6% and 32% in the re-TACE and in the TACE/sorafenib groups (P = .12), respectively. Subgroup analysis by gender, number of nodules at baseline and etiology of liver cirrhosis was performed but no differences were found. No statistical difference was observed in the frequency of side effects, but sorafenib was associated with severe diarrhoea in most patients requiring dose reduction.

CONCLUSION

In our study including HCC patients aged ≥65 years, no differences in survival rate and side effects were found between patients Retreated with further TACE sessions and patients with treatment stage migration to sorafenib after first TACE failure. We included in our analysis a small study population; therefore, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Development of TACE Refractoriness Scores in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose: To identify the independent risk factors for transarterial embolization (TACE) refractoriness and to develop a novel TACE refractoriness score and nomogram for predicting TACE refractoriness in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Between March 2006 and March 2016, HCC patients who underwent TACE monotherapy as initial treatment at two hospitals formed the study cohort and validation cohort. The criteria of TACE refractoriness followed the Japan Society of Hepatology 2014 version of TACE refractoriness. In the study cohort, the independent risk factors for TACE refractoriness were identified, and TACE refractoriness score and nomogram were then developed. The accuracy of the systems was validated externally in the validation cohort.

Results: In total, 113 patients from hospital A formed the study cohort and 122 patients from hospital B formed the validation cohort. In the study cohort, 82.3% of the patients (n = 93) developed TACE refractoriness with a median overall survival (OS) of 540 days (95% CI, 400.8–679.1), and the remaining 20 patients in the TACE-non-refractory group had a median OS of 1,257 days (95% CI, 338.8–2,175.2) (p = 0.019). The median time for developing TACE refractoriness was 207 days (95% CI, 134.8–279.2), and a median number of two TACE procedures were performed after refractoriness developed. The independent risk factors for TACE refractoriness were the number of tumors and bilobular invasion of HCC. TACE refractoriness scores <3.5 indicated a lower incidence of TACE refractoriness, whereas scores >3.5 points indicated a higher incidence (p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, 77.9% of the patients (n = 95) developed TACE refractoriness with a median OS of 568 days (95% CI, 416.3–719.7), and a median OS of 1,324 days was observed in the TACE-non-refractory group (n = 27; 95% CI, 183.5–2,464.5).

Conclusions: TACE refractoriness impairs the OS of HCC patients. The number of tumors and bilobular invasion status were independent risk factors for TACE refractoriness. The TACE refractoriness score can be an effective tool and easy approach to predict the risk of TACE refractoriness status.

How to Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary tumour of the liver with the greatest incidence, particularly in the elderly. Additionally, improvements in the treatments for chronic liver diseases have increased the number of elderly patients who might be affected by HCC. Little evidence exists regarding HCC in old patients, and the elderly are still underrepresented and undertreated in clinical trials. In fact, this population represents a complex subgroup of patients who are hard to manage, especially due to the presence of multiple comorbidities. Therefore, the choice of treatment is mainly decided by the physician in the clinical practice, who often tend not to treat elderly patients in order to avoid the possibility of adverse events, which may alter their unstable equilibrium. In this context, the clarification of the optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients affected by HCC has become an urgent necessity. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the available data regarding the treatment of HCC in elderly patients, starting from the definition of "elderly" and the geriatric assessment and scales. We explain the possible treatment choices according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) scale and their feasibility in the elderly population.

New advances in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer related death in the world. Biannual surveillance for the disease in patients with cirrhosis and in high risk carriers of hepatitis B virus allows early stage cancer detection and treatment with good long term outcomes. Liver ultrasonography and serum α fetoprotein are the most commonly used surveillance tests. If suspicious results are found on the surveillance test, multiphasic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging should be undertaken to confirm the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. If radiologic tests show inconclusive results, liver biopsy or repeat imaging could be considered for confirmation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Management of the disease is complex. Patients should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, and the selection of treatment should consider factors such as tumor burden, severity of liver dysfunction, medical comorbidities, local expertise, and preference of patients. Early stage hepatocellular carcinoma is best managed by curative treatment, which includes resection, ablation, or transplantation. Patients with intermediate stage disease often receive locoregional treatment. Systemic treatment is reserved for patients with advanced disease. Several positive, phase III, randomized controlled trials have expanded the systemic treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with promising long term outcomes, especially trials using combination treatments, which could also have eventual implications for the treatment of earlier stage disease.

A differential risk assessment and decision model for Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma based on hepatic function

BACKGROUND

The decision of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) initiation and/or repetition remains challenging in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim was to develop a prognostic scoring system to guide TACE initiation/repetition.

METHODS

A total of 597 consecutive patients who underwent TACE as their initial treatment for unresectable HCC were included. We derived a prediction model using independent risk factors for overall survival (OS), which was externally validated in an independent cohort (n = 739).

RESULTS

Independent risk factors of OS included Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, maximal tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein, and tumor response to initial TACE, which were used to develop a scoring system ("ASAR"). C-index values for OS were 0.733 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.570-0.871) in the derivation, 0.700 (95% CI = 0.445-0.905) in the internal validation, and 0.680 (95% CI = 0.652-0.707) in the external validation, respectively. Patients with ASAR< 4 showed significantly longer OS than patients with ASAR≥4 in all three datasets (all P < 0.001). Among Child-Pugh class B patients, a modified model without TACE response, i.e., "ASA(R)", discriminated OS with a c-index of 0.788 (95% CI, 0.703-0.876) in the derivation, and 0.745 (95% CI, 0.646-0.862) in the internal validation, and 0.670 (95% CI, 0.605-0.725) in the external validation, respectively. Child-Pugh B patients with ASA(R) < 4 showed significantly longer OS than patients with ASA(R) ≥ 4 in all three datasets (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ASAR provides refined prognostication for repetition of TACE in patients with unresectable HCC. For Child-Pugh class B patients, a modified model with baseline factors might guide TACE initiation.

Prognostic role of alpha-fetoprotein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with repeat transarterial chemoembolisation

BACKGROUND

Repeat transarterial chemoembolisation (rTACE) is often required for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to achieve disease control, however, current practice guidelines regarding treatment allocation vary significantly. This study aims to identify key factors associated with patient survival following rTACE to facilitate treatment allocation and prognostic discussion.

METHOD

Patients with HCC undergoing rTACE at six Australian tertiary centers from 2009 to 2014 were included. Variables encompassing clinical, tumour, treatment type and response factors were analysed against the primary outcome of overall survival. Univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression modelling were used to identify factors pre- and post-TACE therapy significantly associated with survival.

RESULTS

Total of 292 consecutive patients underwent rTACE with mainly Child Pugh A cirrhosis (61%) and BCLC stage A (57%) disease. Median overall survival (OS) was 30 months (IQR 15.2-50.2) from initial TACE. On multivariate analysis greater tumour number (p = 0.02), higher serum bilirubin (p = 0.007) post initial TACE, and hepatic decompensation (p = 0.001) post second TACE were associated with reduced survival. Patients with serum AFP ≥ 200 ng/ml following initial TACE had lower survival (p = 0.001), compared to patients with serum AFP level that remained < 200 ng/ml post-initial TACE, with an overall survival of 19.4 months versus 34.7 months (p = 0.0001) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Serum AFP level following initial treatment in patients undergoing repeat TACE for HCC is a simple and useful clinical prognostic marker. Moreover, it has the potential to facilitate appropriate patient selection for rTACE particularly when used in conjunction with baseline tumour burden and severity of hepatic dysfunction post-initial TACE.

A Pretreatment CT Model Predicts Survival Following Chemolipiodolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose:

To establish a computed tomography–based prognostic model for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Materials and Methods:

Using prospectively collected data from 195 consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent chemolipiodolization at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital between 2013 and 2016, we established a prognostic model based on hepatocellular carcinoma enhancement patterns on computed tomography scans to predict the outcome of transarterial chemoembolization. Furthermore, a histopathology analysis was performed on 108 different patients undergoing resection between 2014 and 2016 to identify whether there was a correlation between enhancement pattern and microvessel density.

Results:

The prognostic model classified hepatocellular carcinoma into 3 types: type I, which reached peak enhancement during the arterial phase and had a high mean microvessel density (101.5 vessels/0.74 mm²); type II, which reached peak enhancement during the portal venous or delayed phase and had an intermediate microvessel density (53.6 vessels/0.74 mm²); and type III, in which the tumor was insignificantly enhanced and had a low microvessel density (21.1 vessels/0.74 mm²). For type I, II, and III hepatocellular carcinoma, the post-transarterial chemoembolization 1-year tumor complete necrosis rates were 13.7%, 36.5%, and 0%, respectively (P < .001), and the 3-year overall survival rates were 14.1%, 38.6%, and 0%, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusion:

Our results indicate that hepatocellular carcinoma type is an independent predictor of complete necrosis and overall survival

Comparison of lipiodol infusion and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-life setting

Aim: Doxorubicin-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is reported to improve survival and tolerability when compared with conventional lipiodol-TACE (cTACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and long-term survival in patients treated with cTACE or DEB-TACE in a real-life setting. Methods: Incidence of adverse events and overall survival in HCC patients treated with either cTACE or DEB-TACE at Karolinska University Hospital 2004-2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Median follow-up was 7.1 years. Patients were censored when transplanted or at the end of follow-up. Patients receiving both cTACE and DEB-TACE, or treated with resection or ablation post-TACE were excluded from the survival analysis. Results: A total of 202 patients (76 cTACE and 126 DEB-TACE) were eligible for analysis of adverse events, and 179 patients (69 cTACE and 110 DEB-TACE) were included in the survival analysis. cTACE patients were younger and had fewer tumors but higher BCLC stage than DEB-TACE. Child-Pugh and ECOG performance status were similar between groups. Adverse events (abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, fever, fatigue) were significantly less common in the DEB-TACE group. Median survival was 17.1 months in the cTACE group and 19.1 months in the DEB-TACE (NS). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, portal vein thrombosis and tumor size were associated with increased, and sorafenib treatment post-TACE with decreased mortality. Conclusion: In this retrospective real-life analysis, DEB-TACE had better tolerability compared to cTACE, but overall survival did not differ between the two treatments. Portal vein thrombosis, tumor size and sorafenib treatment after TACE influence survival.

Better survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy following transarterial chemoembolization in nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

This study compared outcomes of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs. stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) after TACE (TACE + SBRT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 2 centers in Hong Kong. There were 49 patients who had TACE + SBRT and 202 patients who had TACE alone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences in patients' demographics and tumor characteristics between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

After matching, 49 patients were in the TACE + SBRT group and 98 patients in the TACE group with similar baseline characteristics. The 1-&3-year OS were better in TACE + SBRT group (67.2 vs. 43.9% and 36.5 vs. 13.3%, p = 0.003). The 1-&3-year PFS was also better in TACE + SBRT group (32.5 vs. 21.4% and 15.1 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.012). Radiological disease control was better in the TACE + SBRT group (98 vs. 56.7%). Risk of severe toxicity was uncommon in both treatment arms. TACE + SBRT was an independent good prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis, whereas AFP>200 ng/ml, large tumor and multiple tumors predicted worse OS.

CONCLUSION

TACE + SBRT is safe and results in better survivals in nonresectable HCC patients.

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in oldest old patients

Background

For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver resection is a classical curative modality, despite its technical complexity. The incidence of HCC in the oldest old people (aged ≥ 85 years) is rising along with the global increase in life expectancy. Currently, no report has addressed liver resection for HCC in this aged population.

Patients and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 1889 patients receiving curative liver resection for newly diagnosed HCC from 1992 to 2016. At the time of operation, 1858 of them were aged < 85 years (group A), and 31 were aged ≥ 85 years (group B). Another 18 oldest old patients, whose HCC was considered resectable but were not operated on due to the patient’s refusal, served as the control group (group C). The clinicopathological characteristics and early and long-term outcomes were compared between groups A and B. All associated co-morbidities of the patients were well-treated before liver resection. The overall survival (OS) rates were also compared between groups B and C.

Result

Group B had a significantly higher incidence of associated co-morbidities and hepatitis C infection. Postoperative complication rates and 90-day mortality rates after liver resection did not differ between groups A and B (p = 0.834 and p = 1.000, respectively), though group B had a longer postoperative stay (p = 0.001). In groups A and B, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 29.7% and 22.6% (p = 0.163), respectively, and their overall survival rates were 43.5% and 35.5% (p = 0.086). The overall survival rate of group B was significantly different from group C (35.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite a longer postoperative recovery period, liver resection for HCC in the oldest old patients may be justified if co-morbidities are well controlled.

Evaluation of CT vascularization patterns for survival prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by conventional TACE

PURPOSE

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an established treatment for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the power of lesion vascularization criteria based on computed tomography for prognosis of overall survival before initiation of treatment.

METHODS

A total of 59 patients with intermediate stage HCC treated with TACE as first-line treatment were retrospectively evaluated. TACE procedures were performed using doxorubicin, cisplatin, and lipiodol. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) were used to determine the initial tumor response. Four vascularization patterns (VP) of the largest target lesion (homogeneous vascularization [VP1], homogeneous vascularization with additional arterial hypervascularization [VP2], heterogeneous vascularization with [VP3] and without zones of hypervascularization [VP4]) were assessed prior to the first TACE and correlated to survival.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis yielded a median overall survival of 608 days (standard error [SE], 120.5 days). Survival analysis showed significant differences depending on the vascularization patterns (P = 0.012; hazard ratio, 0.327): patients with homogeneously vascularized lesions (VP1, VP2) had a median overall survival of 1091 days (SE, 235.5 days). Patients with heterogeneous vascularization of the lesion (VP3 and VP4) showed a median overall survival of 508 days (SE, 113.9 days).

CONCLUSION

The vascularization pattern of the largest HCC lesion is helpful for survival prognosis under TACE treatment and therefore has the potential to be used as an additional parameter for treatment stratification.

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hematological malignancies

Background

Improvements in antimetabolite drugs have prolonged the survival of patient with hematological malignancies. However, these drugs may have hepatotoxic side effects and may induce acute liver failure, chronic liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, or even hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although liver resection remains a curative option for HCC, its role in HCC with hematological malignancies has never been fully explored.

Methods

A retrospective review of 1725 patients who underwent curative liver resection for newly diagnosed HCC between 1994 and 2016 was conducted. Among these patients, 16 had a history of hematological malignancies (HM group). Their hematological malignancies were well-controlled at the time of liver resection. The clinicopathological characteristics of the HM group, along with their short- and long-term outcomes after liver resection, were compared with those of the other 1709 patients without hematological malignancy (non-HM group).

Results

All HM group patients were seropositive for hepatitis marker surface for hepatitis B and C. No significant differences were observed in any background characteristics between the two groups. The postoperative complication rate and 90-day mortality in the HM and non-HM groups were 25 and 20.4%, P = 0.754, and 0 and 0.6%, P = 1.000, respectively. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates for the HM and non-HM groups were 42.3 and 35.1%, P = 0.552, and 69.5 and 56.9%, P = 0.192, respectively.

Conclusions

Hepatitis markers should be examined during chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. Regular liver imaging studies are recommended for seropositive cases. When HCC occurs secondary to a well-controlled hematological malignancy, liver resection is suggested in selected patients.

Orantinib versus placebo combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENTAL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Orantinib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of orantinib combined with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (cTACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was done at 75 sites in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, no extra-hepatic tumour spread, and Child-Pugh score of 6 or less were randomly assigned (1:1) by interactive web response system using a computer-generated sequence to receive orantinib or placebo, within 28 days of cTACE. Randomisation was stratified by region, Child-Pugh score (5 vs 6), alpha fetoprotein concentrations (<400 ng/mL vs ≥400 ng/mL), and size of the largest lesion (≤50 mm vs >50 mm). Orantinib at 200 mg, twice per day, or placebo was given orally until TACE failure or unacceptable toxicity. The patients, investigators, and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the full analysis set (patients who had received at least one dose of study drug). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01465464, and has been terminated.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 10, 2010, and Nov 21, 2013, 889 patients were randomly assigned to receive either orantinib (445 patients; 444 treated) or placebo (444 patients; all treated). The study was ended at interim analysis for futility evaluation. Median follow-up was 17·3 months (IQR 11·3-26·4). There was no improvement in overall survival with orantinib compared with placebo (median 31·1 months [95% CI 26·5-34·5] vs 32·3 months [28·4-not reached]; hazard ratio 1·090, 95% CI 0·878-1·352; p=0·435). The main adverse events in the orantinib group were oedema, ascites, and elevation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases. The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or worse in the orantinib group included elevated aspartate aminotransferase (189 [43%] patients in the oratinib group, 161 [36%] patients in the placebo group), elevated alanine aminotransferase (150 [34%] patients in the oratinib group, 132 (30%) patients in the placebo group), and hypertension (47 [11%] patients in the oratinib group, 39 [9%] patients in the placebo group). Serious adverse events were reported in 200 (45%) patients in the orantinib group and 134 (30%) patients in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Orantinib combined with cTACE did not improve overall survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

FUNDING

Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing sorafenib therapy

The present study aimed to examine the impact of sarcopenia, defined as low muscle mass on computed tomography (CT), prior to sorafenib therapy on the clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib therapy. In total, 232 patients with unresectable HCC (median age, 72 years) were analyzed, and the extent of sarcopenia was assessed using CT. Cross-sectional areas (cm2) of the skeletal muscles at the third lumbar vertebra level were determined by manual outlining on the CT images. The cross-sectional areas were normalized for height [skeletal muscle index (SMI), cm2/m2]. Based on the findings of previous studies, male patients with SMI ≤36.2 cm2/m2 and female patients with SMI ≤29.6 cm2/m2 were defined as having sarcopenia. The baseline characteristics, overall survival (OS) rates, progression-free survival (PFS) rates and best treatment response of the sarcopenia group were retrospectively compared with those of the non-sarcopenia group, and the factors associated with OS and PFS were examined. Sarcopenia was observed in 151 patients (65.1%). There were 165 patients with Child-Pugh A and 67 with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. In the sarcopenia group, the median treatment duration was 66 days, whereas in the non-sarcopenia group it was 103 days (P=0.001). The median OS time was 174 days in the sarcopenia group and 454 days in the non-sarcopenia group (P<0.0001). The median PFS was 77 days in the sarcopenia group and 106 days in the non-sarcopenia group (P=0.0131). Multivariate analysis identified sarcopenia to be an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio, 0.365; P<0.0001). The objective response rate and disease control rate in the sarcopenia group were significantly lower, compared with those in the non-sarcopenia group (P=0.0146 and P=0.0151, respectively). In conclusion, sarcopenia may be an indicator of poor clinical course in patients with HCC receiving sorafenib.

All-treatment array of hepatocellular carcinoma from initial diagnosis to death: observation of cumulative treatments

PURPOSE

In clinical practice, most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma require subsequent treatments for remaining, progressing, or recurring tumors. We investigated all-treatment array and outcomes in an HCC cohort from initial diagnosis to death.

METHODS

We enrolled 1687 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent initial diagnosis and treatment at the National Cancer Center, Korea, from January 2004 to December 2009.

RESULTS

In total, 1357 patients (80.4%) showed RPRTs during median 20.4-month follow-up. Initial transplantation resulted in the least rate (32.3%) of RPRTs. Median treatment frequency was 3.0 times (range 1-20) and 382 patients (27.3%) received treatments ≥6 times. The median treatment frequency was different based on four factors (p < 0.05): age, tumor stage, tumor type and initial treatment modality. Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0 received less frequent treatments. As the stage progressed from 0 to B, the median treatment frequency increased. Radiofrequency ablation as initial treatment was associated with the longest median treatment interval at 19.0 weeks, followed by resection at 14.1 weeks. The median treatment interval was significantly shorter as the stage progressed (p < 0.01). TACE was most frequently performed for RPRTs; the median number of subsequent TACE was 3 (range 1-19). Subsequent treatment array was very heterogeneous, and no certain pattern was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the survival outcome of patients with HCC is based on the results of cumulative multiple treatments rather than an initial treatment. It is time to consider prospective studies evaluating sequential treatment array of HCC.

Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update

There is great geographical variation in the distribution of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with the majority of all cases worldwide found in the Asia-Pacific region, where HCC is one of the leading public health problems. Since the "Toward Revision of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) HCC Guidelines" meeting held at the 25th annual conference of the APASL in Tokyo, the newest guidelines for the treatment of HCC published by the APASL has been discussed. This latest guidelines recommend evidence-based management of HCC and are considered suitable for universal use in the Asia-Pacific region, which has a diversity of medical environments.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of the first transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and identify predictors for low HRQoL following TACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HRQoL was prospectively evaluated in 79 patients with standardized questionnaires (QlQ-C30 and HCC18) pre- and 2 weeks post-TACE. Treatment response was evaluated using common tumour response criteria. Clinical parameters [e.g. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, Model of End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score], tumour load and pre-TACE HRQoL scores were tested for predicting HRQoL after TACE.

RESULTS

Patients showed a 12.1% decrease in global health score (GHS). Major decreases were observed for physical (-21.4%), role (-23.4%), and social (-21.5%) functioning and increases in symptom severity for fatigue (+30.1%), loss of appetite (+25.3%), pain (+19.4%) after TACE. ECOG performance status >1 was associated with increased nausea/vomiting (p = 0.002) and decreased GHS (p = 0.01). MELD score >10 was associated with increased fatigue (p = 0.021) and abdominal swelling (p < 0.001). Our study showed an increase in symptom severity in patients with no symptoms before TACE for pain (p = 0.005) and abdominal swelling (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The first TACE for treatment of HCC does not result in a major loss of HRQoL in general. For TACE as a palliative therapy maintaining HRQoL is of critical importance and standardized HRQoL assessment can help to detect HRQoL problems.

Locoregional and systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains challenging due to late presentation and the presence of accompanying liver dysfunction. As such, most patients are not eligible for curative resection and liver transplant. Management in this scenario depends on a number of factors including hepatic function, tumor burden, patency of hepatic vasculature and patients' functional status. Based on these, patients can be offered catheter based intra-arterial therapy for intermediate stage disease and in more advanced disease, sorafenib. Given recent data, regorafenib is now an option following failure of sorafenib. Catheter directed intra-arterial therapy takes advantage of tumor hypervascularity and the unique dual blood supply of the liver, as hepatic tumors receive arterial perfusion via the hepatic artery while the rest of the liver is supplied by the portal vein. This allows selective embolization and delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor. Compared to best supportive care, intra-arterial therapy offers a survival benefit in intermediate stage HCC and is the recommended approach for treatment. None of the catheter based approaches; including bland embolization, conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) or trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) offers a clear advantage over the other, although DEB-TACE may be characterized by less systemic toxicity. All of these approaches are contraindicated in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). On the other hand, intra-arterial, radio embolization, with Yttrium-90 (Y90) can be offered to patients with PVT. The place of this modality in management of HCC is still being investigated. The role of sorafenib in advanced HCC is not in doubt, as until recently, it was the only systemic therapy approved for the management in this setting. This is despite multiple trials evaluating other agents. The addition of sorafenib to catheter-based therapy in intermediate stage disease has also failed to show any benefit. The modest survival benefit with sorafenib and the failure of other targeted agents suggest that it is important to look beyond inhibition of angiogenesis in advanced HCC. Identification of key drivers and mediators of HCC remains paramount for successful drug development. In line with this, it is refreshing that the excitement that has followed developments in cancer immunotherapy is finding its way to HCC with early trials of anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies showing sufficient activity that phase III trials are now ongoing for Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab in advanced HCC. Future drug development efforts will focus on defining the feasibility of combining different treatment approaches targeting multiple important modulators of HCC.

New concepts in embolotherapy of HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with rapidly growing incidence rates in the USA and Europe. Despite improving surveillance programs, most patients are diagnosed at intermediate to advanced stages and are no longer amenable to curative therapies, such as ablation, surgical resection and liver transplantation. For such patients, catheter-based image-guided embolotherapies such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) represent the standard of care and mainstay therapy, as recommended and endorsed by a variety of national guidelines and staging systems. The main benefit of these therapies is explained by the preferentially arterial blood supply of liver tumors, which allows to deliver the anticancer therapy directly to the tumor-feeding artery while sparing the healthy hepatic tissue mainly supplied by the portal vein. The tool box of an interventional oncologist contains several different variants of transarterial treatment modalities. Ever since the first TACE more than 30 years ago, these techniques have been progressively refined, both with respect to drug delivery materials and with respect to angiographic micro-catheter and image-guidance technology, thus substantially improving therapeutic outcomes of HCC. This review will summarize the fundamental principles, technical and clinical data on the application of different embolotherapies, such as bland transarterial embolization, Lipiodol-based conventional transarterial chemoembolization as well as TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE). Clinical data on ⁹⁰Yttrium radioembolization as an emerging alternative, mostly applied for niche indications such as HCC with portal vein invasion, will be discussed. Furthermore, we will summarize the principle of HCC staging, patient allocation and response assessment in the setting of HCC embolotherapy. In addition, we will evaluate the role of cone-beam computed tomography as a novel intra-procedural image-guidance technology. Finally, this review will touch on new technical developments such as radiopaque, imageable DEBs and the rationale and role of combined systemic and locoregional therapies, mostly in combination with Sorafenib.

Semiquantitative prediction of early response of conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using postprocedural plain cone-beam computed tomography

AIM

To investigate whether plain cone-beam computed tomography (CT) immediately after conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (c-TACE) can help to predict tumor response semiquantitatively in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Analysis was carried out retrospectively on 262 targeted HCCs in 169 patients treated with c-TACE. Dynamic CT was performed at baseline and 1-4 months after c-TACE. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was undertaken to evaluate whether voxel values of cone-beam CT could predict a complete response and to identify the cut-off value. Final tumor response assessment and early prediction using the retention pattern of iodized oil, the cut-off value of the density, and the combination of the cut-off density value and retention pattern of iodized oil in HCCs on postprocedural cone-beam CT were compared.

RESULTS

Complete response was obtained in 72.9% of lesions. According to the pattern of iodized oil uptake, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting complete response were 85.9%, 70.4%, and 81.7%, respectively by excellent uptake on cone-beam CT. The area under the curve was 0.86 with the optimal cut-off at a voxel value of 200.13. According to not only the density but also the homogeneity of iodized oil retention, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for predicting complete response were 86.4%, 95.8%, and 88.9%, respectively. The predictive accuracy was significantly better than that of the pattern of iodized oil retention only (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The combination of density and visual estimate of homogeneity is superior to either alone in predicting tumor response of c-TACE in HCC patients.

Predictive factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib therapy using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis

AIMS

To investigate variables before sorafenib therapy on the clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving sorafenib and to further assess and compare the predictive performance of continuous parameters using time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 225 HCC patients were analyzed. We retrospectively examined factors related to overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) using univariate and multivariate analyses. Subsequently, we performed time-dependent ROC analysis of continuous parameters which were significant in the multivariate analysis in terms of OS and PFS. Total sum of area under the ROC in all time points (defined as TAAT score) in each case was calculated.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 175 male and 50 female patients (median age, 72 years) and included 158 Child-Pugh A and 67 Child-Pugh B patients. The median OS time was 0.68 years, while the median PFS time was 0.24 years. On multivariate analysis, gender, body mass index (BMI), Child-Pugh classification, extrahepatic metastases, tumor burden, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were identified as significant predictors of OS and ECOG-performance status, Child-Pugh classification and extrahepatic metastases were identified as significant predictors of PFS. Among three continuous variables (i.e., BMI, AST and AFP), AFP had the highest TAAT score for the entire cohort. In subgroup analyses, AFP had the highest TAAT score except for Child-Pugh B and female among three continuous variables.

CONCLUSION

In continuous variables, AFP could have higher predictive accuracy for survival in HCC patients undergoing sorafenib therapy.

Experience from a real-life cohort: outcome of 606 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following transarterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal cancers. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been accepted as the standard care for intermediate stage disease.

METHODS

In this study, we characterized 606 with HCC patients from Hannover Medical School treated with TACE.

RESULTS

606 with HCC patients treated with TACE were identified between 2000 and 2015. Most patients (59.8%) were at intermediate stage. Following TACE, most patients subsequently received systemic therapy or best supportive care (BSC), whereas 227 (37.5%) patients were bridged to potentially curative local treatments. Depending on subsequent therapies, median post-TACE survival ranged from 7 to 162 months. Ascites, cholinesterase, c-reactive and alpha-feto protein and tumor size were identified as prognostic factors. These factors as well as the HAP, mHAP-II and STATE score also determined post-TACE survival independent of subsequent therapies. Hepatic function progressively deteriorated with repeated TACE sessions. Despite that, post-TACE survival was not shortened in frequently treated patients (≥5 times) as compared to patients treated 4 times or less (p = not significant [n.s.]). Patients treated ≥5 times with TACE received significantly more often systemic therapy following TACE (37.3%) as compared to patients with 3-4 (30.1%), 2 (27.4%) and 1 (21.8%) sessions (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

TACE is performed in a heterogeneous population as bridging therapy to other local treatments and palliative therapy. The long-term survival following TACE is determined by baseline tumor, patient-related factors and by subsequent therapies. Post-TACE survival is not shorter in patients with frequent treatments (≥5), and the rate of subsequent systemic treatments is higher compared to less frequently treated patients.

A Modified Model for Assessment for Retreatment with Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

PURPOSE

To develop a modified assessment for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization (mART) score that may be more suitable for Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chinese patients with HCC who were treated with transarterial chemoembolization in four hospitals were included. A univariate analysis and a multivariate forward Cox regression analysis were used to identify significant prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). A point scoring model was subsequently developed from the training cohort, and the validation process was performed in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

The study included 259 patients (124 patients in the training cohort and 135 patients in the validation cohort). Increase in Child-Pugh scores relative to the baseline (P < .001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B before first transarterial chemoembolization (P = .001), and absence of radiologic tumor response (P < .001) were identified as negative prognostic factors for OS and were used to create the mART scores. BCLC staging was substituted for aspartate aminotransferase increase in the mART scores. The mART scores differentiated two groups with distinct prognosis by a cutoff score of 2.5 points (22.9 mo [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.4-28.4] vs 8.9 mo [95% CI, 7.5-10.3] in median survival; P < .001). In the validation cohort, the C index in assessment for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization (ART) criteria was 0.64, whereas it was 0.82 in mART criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese patients with HCC, mART score of > 2.5 before second transarterial chemoembolization was associated with poor prognosis. The mART score was probably better validated compared with the ART score.

Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection within Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0/A: A Retrospective Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency (RF) ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection within Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2007 to December 2011, 110 consecutive patients with recurrent HCC meeting BCLC stage 0/A criteria underwent transarterial chemoembolization (n = 78; mean tumor size, 1.9 cm ± 1.0) or RF ablation (n = 32; mean tumor size, 1.9 cm ± 0.6) as initial treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct survival curves, which were compared by log-rank test. Prognostic factors for OS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

No significant differences between baseline clinical characteristics of the 2 treatment groups were identified. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 89.7%, 61.0%, and 36.6% for the transarterial chemoembolization group and 90.1%, 72.8%, and 60.0% for the RF ablation group. There was no significant difference in OS rates between the groups (P = .159). Subgroup analysis indicated that RF ablation achieved better survival than transarterial chemoembolization among patients ≤ 55 years old and patients with BCLC stage 0 (P = .036 and P = .045). Multivariate analysis revealed that serum albumin (≤ 35 g/L) (hazard ratio = 2.797; 95% confidence interval, 1.366-2.726; P = .005) and α-fetoprotein (> 400 ng/mL) (HR = 2.336; 95% CI, 1.210-4.508; P = .011) levels before treatment were 2 significant risk factors for poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Transarterial chemoembolization might provide a similar OS as RF ablation in patients with recurrent BCLC stage A HCC. However, RF ablation could provide better OS in patients with recurrent BCLC stage 0 HCC.