EASL and AASLD recommendations for the diagnosis of HCC to the test of daily practice

Advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview of the current and evolving therapeutic landscape for clinicians

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Contemporary advances in systemic and locoregional therapies have led to changes in peer-reviewed guidelines regarding systemic therapy as well as the possibility of downstaging disease that may enable some patients with advanced disease to ultimately undergo partial hepatectomy or transplantation with curative intent. This review focuses on all modalities of therapy for HCC, guided by modern-day practice-changing randomized data where available. The surgical management of HCC, including resection and transplantation, both of which have evolving criteria for what is considered biologically resectable and transplantable, as well as locoregional therapy (i.e., therapeutic embolization, ablation, radiation, and hepatic arterial infusion), are discussed. Historical and modern-day practice-changing trials evaluating immunotherapy with targeted therapies for advanced disease, as well as adjuvant systemic therapy, are also summarized. In addition, this article examines the critical dimension of toxicities and patient-oriented considerations to ensure a comprehensive and balanced discourse on treatment implications.

Diagnostic Utility of Clusterin in Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Core Biopsies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Several immunohistochemical markers are available for demonstrating hepatocytic differentiation, thereby confirming the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Clusterin is a new marker of malignant hepatocytes, not evaluated in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) samples. Hence, we evaluated its diagnostic utility in FNAB cell blocks (CB) and core biopsy samples.

METHODS

A total of 47 cases of HCC diagnosed on FNAB with CB (41)/core biopsy (6) were retrieved. For comparison, CB from metastatic adenocarcinoma (15) and cases with incidental benign hepatocytes (12) were included. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for clusterin was performed and the 3 groups were compared to derive its sensitivity and specificity. Canalicular expression was considered positive for hepatocytic differentiation.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 47 cases of HCC, with 43 (91.5%) male and 4 (8.5%) female patients with an age range of 20-78 years. On clusterin IHC, benign hepatocytes showed a track-like canalicular pattern whereas in HCC, typical enhanced canalicular positivity (3+ intensity) was seen in 32/47 (68%) cases, 17 of which additionally showed cytoplasmic positivity. Only cytoplasmic positivity was noted in 7 HCC cases and was considered negative. All cases of well differentiated (6/6), 67.6% (25/37) of moderately differentiated, and 25% (1/4) of poorly differentiated HCC showed enhanced canalicular positivity, whereas metastatic adenocarcinoma showed cytoplasmic (2/15) or nucleocytoplasmic (1/15) positivity only.

CONCLUSION

IHC for clusterin with enhanced canalicular pattern of expression revealed 68% sensitivity and 100% specificity for HCC, aiding its distinction from metastatic adenocarcinoma and benign hepatocytes in FNAB samples, thereby confirming its diagnostic utility.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Morphological spectrum and subtyping as per the World Health Organization classification on FNA biopsy with cell block samples

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be diagnosed and further subclassified in surgical specimen as per the recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification into several distinct subtypes with prognostic implications. The aim of this study was to apply this WHO classification on fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) samples of HCC and describe their features.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all ultrasound-guided FNAB of liver mass lesions in patients with suspected HCC (n = 164) over a 7-year period. Detailed morphological assessment of cytopathological features and grading was done and correlated with each other. HCC was subtyped further in cases with available cell blocks (n = 126).

RESULTS

A total of 164 cases of HCC were evaluated on FNAB with age range of 18-88 years (mean, 60 years), and with 140 (85.4%) male and 24 (14.6%) female patients. Grading performed on 160 cases of HCC (after excluding fibrolamellar HCC) revealed 23 well differentiated, 127 moderately differentiated, and 10 poorly differentiated HCCs. Subtyping was feasible in 126 cases, of which 26 cases (20.6%) showed specific subtypes that were steatohepatitic (8), lymphocyte-rich (8), fibrolamellar (4), neutrophil-rich (3), macrotrabecular massive (2), and clear cell HCC (1) with remaining cases (100) being conventional HCC, no special type.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility of subtyping HCC (as per the current WHO classification) for the first time on FNAB with cell blocks that carries implication for prognostication and emphasizes the importance of obtaining tissue diagnosis by FNAB with cell blocks.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening: From Current Standard of Care to Future Directions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant portion of global cancer incidence and mortality. Screening with ultrasound with or without alpha-fetoprotein is recommended for those at high-risk. Although screening can lead to earlier treatment and better outcomes, existing screening paradigms have several flaws. Ultrasound does not capture all early lesions and has lower efficacy in specific populations such as patients with obesity or those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Additionally, individuals with noncirrhotic MASLD and chronic hepatitis C also develop HCC, although not at high enough rates to justify screening based on current standards. These individuals, however, represent a substantial proportion of new HCC cases given rising MASLD rates and the endemic nature of hepatitis C in certain regions. Risk-stratifying these populations may reveal subsets that are higher risk and warrant screening. Several imaging advances, including contrast-enhanced ultrasound and abbreviated MRI protocols, may improve detection compared with the current approach. Evaluation of risk stratification and validation of these new imaging methods via clinical trials would likely lead to adjusting screening guidelines. This narrative review provides a diagnostic and interventional radiology-focused summary of the HCC screening guidelines and their recent evolution and highlights emerging imaging methods as potential screening tools of the future.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

Diagnostic performance of Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS in identifying definitive hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients according to KLCA-NCC 2022 and APASL 2017 guidelines

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of Sonazoid-contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in identifying definitive HCC within hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients, comparing the KLCA-NCC 2022 and APASL 2017 diagnostic guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed cirrhotic patients who underwent Sonazoid-CEUS for liver lesion evaluation between October 2019 and October 2023. HCC diagnosis was based on the KLCA-NCC 2022 and APASL 2017 guidelines. Inter-reader agreement on CEUS imaging features and the diagnostic accuracy of the guidelines were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity comparisons were made using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Among 400 patients with 432 lesions, CEUS showed excellent inter-reader consistency in detecting arterial phase hyperenhancement and Kupffer defects. The KLCA-NCC 2022 criteria notably enhanced sensitivity to 96.2%, with specificity and accuracy of 93.8% and 95.8%, respectively. APASL 2017 achieved the highest sensitivity at 97.8%, although specificity dropped to 46.9%, resulting in an accuracy of 90.3%. The KLCA-NCC 2022 guidelines demonstrated significantly higher specificity than APASL 2017 (p < 0.001), while APASL 2017 exhibited the highest sensitivity at 97.8%. Notably, the KLCA-NCC 2022 guidelines also demonstrated an impressive positive predictive value of 98.9%.

CONCLUSION

Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS, particularly when applied using the KLCA-NCC 2022 guidelines, is an effective diagnostic tool for HCC.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Perfluorobutane CEUS, particularly in accordance with the KLCA-NCC 2022 guidelines, emerges as a valuable adjunct for diagnosing HCC in cirrhotic patients. It demonstrates superior positive predictive value and specificity compared to APASL 2017, underscoring its potential as an effective diagnostic tool.

KEY POINTS

Contrast-enhanced (CE)US using Sonazoid with KLCA-NCC 2022 guidelines is highly effective for HCC diagnosis. KLCA-NCC 2022 criteria showed high accuracy, 96.2% sensitivity, and 98.9% PPV. CEUS demonstrated excellent inter-reader consistency in detecting arterial phase hyperenhancement and Kupffer defects.

Clinical impact of MRI on indeterminate findings on contrast-enhanced CT suspicious of HCC

OBJECTIVES

In patients evaluated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used secondarily when multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ceCT) is inconclusive. We investigated the clinical impact of adding MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-institution retrospective study included 48 MRI scans (44 patients) conducted from May 2016 to July 2023 due to suspicion of HCC on a multiphase ceCT scan. Data included medical history, preceding and subsequent imaging, histology when available, and decisions made at multidisciplinary team meetings.

RESULTS

In case of possible HCC recurrence, 63% of the MRI scans were diagnostic of HCC. For 80% of the negative MRI scans, the patients were diagnosed with HCC within a median of 165 days in the suspicious area of the liver. In case of possible de-novo HCC in patients with cirrhosis, 22% of the scans were diagnostic of HCC and 33% of the negative MRI scans were of patients diagnosed with HCC within a median of 109 days. None of the non-cirrhotic patients with possible de-novo HCC and negative MRI scans (64%) were later diagnosed with HCC, but 3/5 of the indeterminate scans were of patients diagnosed with HCC in a biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary MRI to a multiphase ceCT scan suspicious of HCC is highly valuable in ruling out HCC in non-cirrhotic patients and in diagnosing HCC non-invasively in cirrhotic patients and patients with prior HCC. Patients with cirrhosis or prior HCC are still at high risk of having HCC if MRI results are inconclusive or negative.

Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as an extrahepatic mass: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver tumor generally diagnosed based on radiographic findings. Metastatic disease is typically associated with increased tumor diameter, multifocality, and vascular invasion. We report a case of a patient who presented with extrahepatic HCC metastasis to a portocaval lymph node with occult hepatic primary on computed tomography (CT). We review the literature for cases of extrahepatic HCC presentation without known hepatic lesions and discuss strategies to differentiate between metastatic and ectopic HCC.

CASE SUMMARY

A 67-year-old male with remotely treated hepatis C was referred for evaluation of an enlarging portocaval, mixed cystic-solid mass. Serial CT evaluations demonstrated steatosis, but no cirrhosis or liver lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound demonstrated a normal-appearing pancreas, biliary tree, and liver. Fine needle aspiration yielded atypical cells. The differential diagnosis included duodenal or pancreatic cyst, lymphoproliferative cyst, stromal or mesenchymal lesions, nodal involvement from gastrointestinal or hematologic malignancy, or duodenal gastro-intestinal stromal tumor. After review by a multidisciplinary tumor board, the patient underwent open surgical resection of a 5.2 cm × 5.5 cm retroperitoneal mass with pathology consistent with moderately-differentiated HCC. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subsequently demonstrated a 1.2 cm segment VIII hepatic lesion with late arterial enhancement, fatty sparing, and intrinsic T1 hyperintensity. Alpha fetoprotein was 23.3 ng/mL. The patient was diagnosed with HCC with portocaval nodal involvement. Review: We surveyed the literature for HCC presenting as extrahepatic masses without history of concurrent or prior intrahepatic HCC. We identified 18 cases of extrahepatic HCC ultimately found to represent metastatic lesions, and 30 cases of extrahepatic HCC found to be primary, ectopic HCC.

CONCLUSION

Hepatocellular carcinoma can seldomly present with extrahepatic metastasis in the setting of occult primary. In patients with risk factors for HCC and lesions suspicious for metastatic disease, MRI may be integral to identifying small hepatic lesions and differentiating from ectopic HCC. Tumor markers may also have utility in establishing the diagnosis.

Current Trends and Advancements in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health burden with a high mortality rate. Over the past 40 years, significant progress has been achieved in the prevention and management of HCC.

SUMMARY

Hepatitis B vaccination programs, the development of direct acting antiviral drugs for Hepatitis C, and effective surveillance strategies provide a profound basis for the prevention of HCC. Advanced surgery and liver transplantation along with local ablation techniques potentially offer cure for the disease. Also, just recently, the introduction of immunotherapy opened a new chapter in systemic treatment. Finally, the introduction of the BCLC classification system for HCC, clearly defining patient groups and assigning reasonable treatment options, has standardized treatment and become the basis of almost all clinical trials for HCC. With this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of HCC management and also touch on current challenges.

KEY MESSAGE

A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for effective HCC management. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to further enhance treatment options and will ultimately reduce the global burden of this devastating disease.

Fat-containing hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: proposal of a diagnostic modification regarding enhancement characteristics

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an algorithm for the non-invasive diagnosis of these fat-containing HCCs.

METHODS

Eighty-four cirrhotic patients with 77 fat-containing HCCs and 11 non-HCC fat-containing nodules were retrospectively included. All MRIs were reviewed; nodule characteristics, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and LI-RADS classifications, and survival were collected. One of the major features of LI-RADS v2018 (non-rim-like arterial phase hyperenhancement [APHE]) was changed to include different enhancing patterns at arterial phase and a new fat-LI-RADS algorithm was created for fat-containing nodules in cirrhosis. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in both a derivation and external validation cohort (external cohort including 58 fat-containing HCCs and 10 non-HCC fat nodules). Reproducibility of this new algorithm was assessed.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, 54/77 (70.1%) fat-containing HCCs had APHE, 62/77 (80.5%) had enhancement compared to the nodule itself at arterial phase (APE), 43/77 (55.8%) had washout, and 20/77 (26.0%) had an enhancing capsule. EASL and LI-RADS had a sensitivity of 37.7% (29/77) and 36.4% (28/77), respectively, for the diagnosis of fat-containing HCC and both had a specificity of 100% (11/11). The new fat-LI-RADS algorithm increased sensitivity to 50.6% (39/77) without decreasing the specificity of 100% (11/11). The validation cohort confirmed the increased sensitivity, with a slight decrease in specificity. The concordance for the diagnosis of HCC for fat-LR5 was 85.3% (58/68).

CONCLUSION

The new fat-LI-RADS algorithm proposed here significantly improves the performance of the non-invasive diagnosis of fat-containing HCC and thus could reduce the number of biopsies conducted for fat-containing HCCs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The European Association for the Study of the Liver and LI-RADS guidelines are poorly sensitive for the diagnosis of fat-containing HCC, mainly because of the low rate of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) displayed by fat-containing HCC. Using all types of enhancement instead of APHE improves sensitivity of LI-RADS.

KEY POINTS

• Fat-containing HCCs on MRI account for 7.5% of HCCs and have different imaging characteristics from non-fatty HCCs. • The European Association for the Study of the Liver and LI-RADS algorithms for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC have low sensitivity for the diagnosis of fat-containing HCC with MRI (37.7% and 36.4%, respectively). • The new fat-LI-RADS, which includes a slight modification of the "arterial enhancement" criterion, improves the sensitivity for the diagnosis of fat-containing HCC using MRI, without degrading the specificity.

Prognostic Factors for Mortality in Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Diagnosis: Development of a Predictive Model Using Artificial Intelligence

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75% of primary liver tumors. Controlling risk factors associated with its development and implementing screenings in risk populations does not seem sufficient to improve the prognosis of these patients at diagnosis. The development of a predictive prognostic model for mortality at the diagnosis of HCC is proposed.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, the analysis of data from 191 HCC patients was conducted using machine learning (ML) techniques to analyze the prognostic factors of mortality that are significant at the time of diagnosis. Clinical and analytical data of interest in patients with HCC were gathered.

RESULTS

Meeting Milan criteria, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification and albumin levels were the variables with the greatest impact on the prognosis of HCC patients. The ML algorithm that achieved the best results was random forest (RF).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of a predictive prognostic model at the diagnosis is a valuable tool for patients with HCC and for application in clinical practice. RF is useful and reliable in the analysis of prognostic factors in the diagnosis of HCC. The search for new prognostic factors is still necessary in patients with HCC.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Prediction of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Systemic and Locoregional Therapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer and the sixth most common malignant tumor in the world, with an incidence of 2-8% per year in patients with hepatic cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis. Despite surveillance schedules, it is sometimes diagnosed at an advanced stage, requiring complex therapeutic efforts with both locoregional and systemic treatments. Traditional radiological tools (computed tomography and magnetic resonance) are used for the post-treatment follow-up of HCC. The first follow-up imaging is performed at 4 weeks after resection or locoregional treatments, or after 3 months from the beginning of systemic therapies, and subsequently every 3 months for the first 2 years. For this reason, these radiological methods do not grant the possibility of an early distinction between good and poor therapeutic response. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) have gained the interest of several researchers for their potential role in the early assessment of response to locoregional treatments (chemoembolization) or antiangiogenic therapies in patients with advanced HCC. In fact, DCE-US, through a quantitative analysis performed by specific software, allows the construction of time-intensity curves, providing an evaluation of the parameters related to neoplastic tissue perfusion and its potential changes following therapies. It has the invaluable advantage of being easily repeatable, minimally invasive, and able to grant important evaluations regarding patients' survival, essential for well-timed therapeutic changes in case of unsatisfying response, and eventual further treatment planning.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and MRI results obtained by expert and novice radiologists indicating short-term response after transarterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To evaluate inter-reader agreement between novice and expert radiologists in assessing contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images for detecting viable tumours with different sizes after conventional transarterial chemoembolisation (cTACE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included patients who had less than five hepatomas and who underwent cTACE. Hepatomas with one or two feeding arteries were selected as target lesions. CEUS and MRI were performed within 1 week after cTACE to evaluate viable tumours.

RESULTS

The expert group had higher kappa values in evaluating all tumour sizes via CEUS compared with MRI. The novice group had similar kappa values. In patients with tumours measuring ≤3 cm, the expert group had higher kappa values in reading CEUS compared with MRI images; however, in the novice group, the kappa value was lower in evaluating CEUS compared with MRI images. In patients with tumours measuring >3 cm, the expert and novice groups had good to excellent kappa values. The confidence level of the two groups in reading MRI images was high; however, the novice group had a lower confidence level.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a convenient, cost-effective, and easy to apply imaging tool that can help interventionists perform early detection of viable hepatocellular carcinoma post-TACE. It has a higher inter-rater agreement in interpreting CEUS images compared with MRI images among expert radiologists even when they are extremely familiar with post-cTACE MRI images. In novice radiologists, there may be a learning curve to achieve good consistency in CEUS interpretation.

Impact of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Size on Sonazoid Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Enhancement Features

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the impact of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor size on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enhancement features, especially in tumors with diameters ≤30 mm and <10 mm.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included patients with histopathologically confirmed HCC lesions and divided them into three groups on the basis of tumor size. All patients underwent Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS examinations before surgery. B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) features and CEUS enhancement patterns were evaluated according to current World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines criteria. The χ2- and Student t-tests were used to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

We included 132 patients with histopathologically confirmed HCC lesions from November 2020 to September 2022. On the basis of tumor size, patients were divided into group 1 (<10 mm, n = 5), group 2 (10-30 mm, n = 54) and group 3 (>30 mm, n = 73). On BMUS, most HCCs appeared heterogeneous but predominantly hypo-echoic (61.4%, 81/132) with ill-defined margins and irregular shapes. Meanwhile, iso-echoic features were more common in small HCCs ≤30 mm (15.3%, 9/59), but a mixed hyper- and hypo-echoic appearance was more common in HCCs >30 mm (17.8%, 13/73) (p = 0.003). On Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS, all HCCs presented arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (100.0%, 132/132). Most HCCs >30 mm exhibited heterogeneous hyperenhancement (86.3%, 63/73), whereas nearly one-third of small HCCs ≤30 mm exhibited homogeneous hyperenhancement (35.6%, 21/59) (p = 0.003). In the portal venous phase, there was a significantly higher proportion of washout in HCCs >30 mm (84.9%, 62/73) than in small HCCs ≤30 mm (64.4%, 38/59) (p = 0.006). During the Kupffer phase, 11 additional hypo-enhanced lesions (mean size: 14.1 ± 4.1 mm, iso-echoic on BMUS), which were also suspected to be HCC lesions, were detected in 5 patients with small HCCs ≤30 mm and 4 patients with HCCs >30 mm. All 5 cases of HCCs <10 mm exhibited APHE and late washout (>60 s). The majority (3/5, 60%) exhibited washout in the portal venous phase (70, 74 and 75 s), one case did so in the late phase (125 s) and another in the Kupffer phase (420 s).

CONCLUSION

Tumor size had a significant impact on the washout features of HCC lesions on Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS. Small HCC lesions ≤30 mm had a higher proportion of relatively late washout in comparison to larger lesions. Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS might be helpful in the detection and characterization of HCC lesions <10 mm.

Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic ability between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Original studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and CEUS in differentiating ICC from HCC were identified in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Histopathological examination was used as the reference standard for tumor diagnosis. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 scale. Data were extracted to calculate the pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) using a bivariate random-effects model, as well as the area under the curve (AUC). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and investigation of publication bias were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies with 28 data subsets (18 on MRI, 10 on CEUS) were included, consisting of 4169 patients with 1422 ICC lesions and 2747 HCC lesions. Most MRI studies were performed at 3T with hepatobiliary agents, and most CEUS studies used SonoVue as the contrast agent. In MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC in distinguishing ICC from HCC were 0.81 (0.79, 0.84), 0.90 (0.88, 0.91), 41.47 (24.07, 71.44), and 0.93 (0.90, 0.96), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC of CEUS were 0.88 (0.84, 0.90), 0.80 (0.78, 0.83), 42.06 (12.38, 133.23), and 0.93 (0.87, 0.99), respectively. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis demonstrated significant heterogeneity among the studies associated with the type of contrast agent in MRI studies. No publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

Both MRI and CEUS showed excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating ICC from HCC. CEUS showed higher pooled sensitivity and MRI showed higher pooled specificity.

Wavelet radiomics features from multiphase CT images for screening hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis and comparison

Early detection of liver malignancy based on medical image analysis plays a crucial role in patient prognosis and personalized treatment. This task, however, is challenging due to several factors, including medical data scarcity and limited training samples. This paper presents a study of three important aspects of radiomics feature from multiphase computed tomography (CT) for classifying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other focal liver lesions: wavelet-transformed feature extraction, relevant feature selection, and radiomics features-based classification under the inadequate training samples. Our analysis shows that combining radiomics features extracted from the wavelet and original CT domains enhance the classification performance significantly, compared with using those extracted from the wavelet or original domain only. To facilitate the multi-domain and multiphase radiomics feature combination, we introduce a logistic sparsity-based model for feature selection with Bayesian optimization and find that the proposed model yields more discriminative and relevant features than several existing methods, including filter-based, wrapper-based, or other model-based techniques. In addition, we present analysis and performance comparison with several recent deep convolutional neural network (CNN)-based feature models proposed for hepatic lesion diagnosis. The results show that under the inadequate data scenario, the proposed wavelet radiomics feature model produces comparable, if not higher, performance metrics than the CNN-based feature models in terms of area under the curve.

Detection of arterial phase hyperenhancement of small hepatocellular carcinoma with MRI: Comparison between single arterial and multi-arterial phases and between extracellular and hepatospecific contrast agents

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the detection rate of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between single arterial phase (single-AP) and triple hepatic arterial (triple-AP) phase MRI and between extracellular (ECA) and hepato-specific (HBA) contrast agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 109 cirrhotic patients with 136 HCCs from seven centers were included. There were 93 men and 16 women, with a mean age of 64.0 ± 8.9 (standard deviation) years (range: 42-82 years). Each patient underwent both ECA-MRI and HBA (gadoxetic acid)-MRI examination within one month of each other. Each MRI examination was retrospectively reviewed by two readers blinded to the second MRI examination. The sensitivities of triple- and single-AP for the detection of APHE were compared, and each phase of the triple-AP sequence was compared with the other two.

RESULTS

No differences in APHE detection were found between single-AP (97.2%; 69/71) and triple-AP (98.5%; 64/65) (P > 0.99) at ECA-MRI. No differences in APHE detection were found between single-AP (93%; 66/71) and triple-AP (100%; 65/65) at HBA-MRI (P = 0.12). Patient age, size of the nodules, use of automatic triggering, type of contrast agent, and type of sequence were not significantly associated with APHE detection. The reader was the single variable significantly associated with APHE detection. For triple-AP, best APHE detection rate was found for early and middle-AP images compared to late-AP images (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003). All APHEs were detected with the combination of early-AP and middle-AP images, except one that was detected on late-AP images by one reader.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that both single- and triple-AP can be used in liver MRI for the detection of small HCC especially when using ECA. Early AP and middle-AP are the most efficient phases and should be preferred for detecting APHE, regardless of the contrast agent used.

Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging protocol in small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤2 cm) in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Biannual Ultrasound showed insufficient sensitivity in detecting small or early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (A-MRI) protocols with fewer sequences demonstrated higher HCC detection sensitivity than ultrasound with acceptable cost and examination time.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced A-MRI with a full sequence MRI (F-MRI) protocol for small HCC (≤2 cm) in cirrhotic or hepatitis B virus-infected high-risk patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two hundred and four consecutive patients with 166 pathologically confirmed small HCC who underwent preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively included. A-MRI set comprised T1-weighted hepatobiliary phase imaging, T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. Two independent radiologists blinded to clinical data assessed the A-MRI set and F-MRI set. Per-patient HCC and per-lesion HCC diagnostic performance were compared.

RESULTS

Per-patient HCC detection sensitivity of A-MRI set was 93.8% and 91.2% for observer 1 and observer 2, and, for the F-MRI set, the per-patient HCC detection sensitivity was 96.6% and 95.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in per-patient sensitivity, specificity and per-lesion HCC detection sensitivity between the two imaging sets for both readers. (P = 0.06-0.25) The A-MRI set showed higher sensitivity on HCC without arterial phase hyperenhancement, and the F-MRI set demonstrated with higher sensitivity on HCC with arterial phase hyperenhancement (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A-MRI using diagnostic criteria including hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase plus mild to moderate hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging or restricted diffusion demonstrated comparable sensitivity and specificity for small HCC compared to the F-MRI protocol in high-risk patients.

Exploiting targeted nanomedicine for surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the cancers that has the highest morbidity and mortality rates. In clinical practice, there are still many limitations in surveilling, diagnosing, and treating HCC, such as the poor detection of early HCC, the frequent post-surgery recurrence, the low local tumor control rate, the therapy resistance and side effects. Therefore, improved, or innovative modalities are urgently required for early diagnosis as well as refined and effective management. In recent years, nanotechnology research in the field of HCC has received great attention, with various aspects of diagnosis and treatment including biomarkers, ultrasound, diagnostic imaging, intraoperative imaging, ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Different from previous reviews that discussed from the perspective of nanoparticles' structure, design and function, this review systematically summarizes the methods and limitations of diagnosing and treating HCC in clinical guidelines and practices, as well as nanomedicine applications. Nanomedicine can overcome the limitations to improve diagnosis accuracy and therapeutic effect via enhancement of targeting, biocompatibility, bioavailability, controlled releasing, and combination of different clinical treatment modalities. Through an in-depth understanding of the logic of nanotechnology to conquer clinical limitations, the main research directions of nanotechnology in HCC are sorted out in this review. It is anticipated that nanomedicine will play a significant role in the future clinical practices of HCC.

Effect of PIVKA-II and AFP secretion status on early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after open and laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II) and Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) have been widely used as diagnostic markers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the prognostic values of the two serum markers and their clinical usefulness in patient selection for different surgical approaches remain largely unclear.

METHODS

HCC patients received surgical treatment between 2015 and 2019 were included. Patients were divided into four statuses according to the serum PIVKA-II and AFP secretion status: PIVKA-II (-) AFP (-) (status 1); PIVKA-II (+) AFP (-) (status 2); PIVKA-II (-) AFP (+) (status 3); PIVKA-II (+) AFP (+) (status 4). Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to compare the survivals of the four groups and the HCC patients received different surgical interventions; time-dependent AUC curves were introduced to evaluate the prognostic value of the PIV-AFP status; Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

A total of 518 patients were included. Patients with PIVKA-II (+) and APF (+) presented significantly decreased OS and RFS comparing to the other statuses. The areas under ROC curves of PIV-AFP status in predicting OS and RFS were superior to the PIVKA-II or the AFP alone. The HCC patients in early stages with PIVKA-II (+) and APF (+) had worse RFS when received laparoscopic hepatectomy than those who received open hepatectomy, whereas there was no difference in other secretion statuses. The PIVKA-II (+) and AFP (+) secretion status was an independent risk factor for OS, RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The PIV-AFP secretion status is of favorable clinical utility in predicting the OS and RFS of the HCC patients; extra caution is needed when applicated the laparoscopic approach in the HCC patients with PIVKA-II (+) and AFP (+).

Radiological findings in non-surgical recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: From locoregional treatments to immunotherapy

Since hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents an important cause of mortality and morbidity all over the world. Currently, it is fundamental not only to achieve a curative treatment but also to manage in the best way any possible recurrence. Even if the latest update of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines for HCC treatment has introduced new locoregional techniques and confirmed others as well-established clinical practices, there is still no consensus about the treatment of recurrent HCC (RHCC). Locoregional treatments and medical therapy represent two of the most widely accepted approaches for disease control, especially in the advanced stage of liver disease. Different medical treatments are now approved, and others are under investigation. On this basis, radiology plays a central role in the diagnosis of RHCC and the assessment of response to locoregional treatments and medical therapy for RHCC. This review summarized the actual clinical practice by underlining the importance of the radiological approach both in the diagnosis and treatment of RHCC.

Visualization Score of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Effect on the Diagnostic Accuracy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The visualization score of hepatobiliary-phase (HBP) images has been introduced as an image quality index for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. It may be associated with hepatic function and could have an implication on the diagnostic accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between the visualization score of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and clinical factors and to evaluate its effect on the diagnostic accuracy for HCC ≤ 3.0 cm.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 493 focal lesions from 397 patients.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 5-T or 3.0 -T with pre/postcontrast T1-weighted 3D gradient echo sequence, and T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence ASSESSMENT: Child-Pugh classification and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score were assessed. Three readers evaluated the visualization score of each MRI examination (A, no or minimal; B, moderate; and C, severe limitations), and major features (arterial-phase hyperenhancement, washout, enhancing capsule, threshold growth) and ancillary features of each focal lesion.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors associated with a suboptimal visualization score (B or C). Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HCC between the two group (visualization score A vs. B or C). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 397 MRI examinations, the incidence of suboptimal visualization score was 13%. A suboptimal visualization score was significantly associated with Child-Pugh classification B or C (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 15.2) and ALBI grade 2 or 3 (OR = 4.7). Compared with the visualization score A group, the suboptimal visualization score group showed significantly lower sensitivity (56.8% vs. 75.2%) and less frequent washout in HCC (62.2% vs. 84.0%).

DATA CONCLUSION

The visualization score on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can be an important image quality index and the diagnostic accuracy for HCC ≤ 3.0 cm may not be sufficient in the suboptimal visualization score group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

High frame-rate contrast enhanced ultrasound (HIFR-CEUS) in the characterization of small hepatic lesions in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

To show the effectiveness of plane wave HighFrame-Rate CEUS (HiFR-CEUS) compared with "conventional" (plane wave) CEUS (C-CEUS) in the characterization of small (< 2 cm) focal liver lesions (FLLs) not easily detected by CT in cirrhotic patients. HiFR-CEUS exploit an ultra-wideband nonlinear process to combine fundamental, second and higher-order harmonic signals generated by ultrasound contrast agents to increase the frame rate. C-CEUS is limited by the transmission principle, and its frame-rate is around 10 FPS. With HiFR-CEUS (Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., China), the frame-rate reached 60 FPS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ultrasound detected small FLLs (< 2 cm) in 63 cirrhotic patients during follow-up (June 2019-February 2020); (7 nodules < 1 cm and were not evaluable by spiral CT). Final diagnosis was obtained with MRI (47) or fine needle aspiration (16 cases) C-CEUS was performed and HiFR-CEUS was repeated after 5 min; 0.8-1.2 ml of contrast media (SonoVue, Bracco, Italy) was used. 57 nodules were better evaluable with HiFR-CEUS; 6 nodules were equally evaluable by both techniques; final diagnosis was: 44 benign lesions (29 hemangiomas, 1 amartoma, 2 hepatic cysts; 2 focal nodular hyperplasias, 3 regenerative macronodules, 3 AV-shunts, 3 hepatic sparing areas and 1 focal steatosis) and 19 malignant one (17 HCCs, 1 cholangioca, 1 metastasis); statistical evaluation for better diagnosis with X2 test (SPSS vers. 26); we used LI-RADS classification for evaluating sensitivity, specificity PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of C- and HFR-CEUS. Corrispective AU-ROC were calculated.

RESULTS

C-CEUS and HiFR-CEUS reached the same diagnosis in 29 nodules (13 nodules > 1 < 1.5 cm; 16 nodules > 1.5 < 2 cm); HiFR-CEUS reached a correct diagnosis in 32 nodules where C-CEUS was not diagnostic (6 nodules < 1 cm; 17 nodules > 1 < 1.5 cm; 9 nodules > 1.5 < 2 cm); C-CEUS was better in 2 nodules (1 < 1 cm and 1 > 1 < 1.5 cm). Some patient's (sex, BMI, age) and nodule's characteristics (liver segment, type of diagnosis, nodule's dimensions (p = 0.65)) were not correlated with better diagnosis (p ns); only better visualization (p 0.004) was correlated; C-CEUS obtained the following LI-RADS: type-1: 18 Nodules, type-2: 21; type-3: 7, type-4: 7; type-5: 8; type-M: 2; HiFR-CEUS: type-1: 38 Nodules, type-2: 2; type-3:4, type-4: 2; type-5: 15; type-M: 2; In comparison with final diagnosis: C-CEUS: TP: 17; TN: 39; FP: 5; FN:2; HIFR-CEUS: TP: 18; TN: 41; FP: 3; FN:1; C-CEUS: sens: 89.5%; Spec: 88.6%, PPV: 77.3%; NPV: 95.1%; Diagn Acc: 88.6% (AU-ROC: 0.994 ± SEAUC: 0.127; CI: 0.969-1.019); HiHFR CEUS: sens: 94.7%; Spec: 93.2%, PPV: 85.7%; NPV: 97.6%; Diagn Acc: 93.2% (AU-ROC: 0.9958 ± SEAUC: 0.106; CI: 0.975-1.017) FLL vascularization in the arterial phase was more visible with HiFR-CEUS than with C-CEUS, capturing the perfusion details in the arterial phase due to a better temporal resolution. With a better temporal resolution, the late phase could be evaluated longer with HiFR-CEUS (4 min C-CEUS vs. 5 min HiFR-CEUS).

CONCLUSION

Both C-CEUS and HIFR-CEUS are good non invasive imaging system for the characterization of small lesions detected during follow up of cirrhotic patients. HiFR-CEUS allowed better FLL characterization in cirrhotic patients with better temporal and spatial resolution capturing the perfusion details that cannot be easily observed with C-CEUS.

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable, Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Before PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21-1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20-1.32; P = .167).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.

Sonazoid™ versus SonoVue® for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in At-Risk Individuals: A Prospective, Single-Center, Intraindividual, Noninferiority Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasound (SZUS) was noninferior to SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound (SVUS) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the same diagnostic criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-center, noninferiority study (NCT04847726) enrolled 105 at-risk participants (71 male; mean age ± standard deviation, 63 ± 11 years; range, 26-86 years) with treatment-naïve solid hepatic nodules (≥ 1 cm). All participants underwent same-day SZUS (experimental method) and SVUS (control method) for one representative nodule per participant. Images were interpreted by three readers (the operator and two independent readers). All malignancies were diagnosed histopathologically, while the benignity of other lesions was confirmed by follow-up stability or pathology. The primary endpoint was per-lesion diagnostic accuracy for HCC pooled across three readers using the conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic criteria, including arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by mild (assessed within 2 minutes after contrast injection) and late (≥ 60 seconds with a delay of 5 minutes) washout. The noninferiority delta was -10%p. Furthermore, different time delays were compared as washout criteria in SZUS, including delays of 2, 5, and > 10 minutes.

RESULTS

A total of 105 lesions (HCCs [n = 61], non-HCC malignancies [n = 19], and benign [n = 25]) were evaluated. Using the 5-minutes washout criterion, per-lesion accuracy of SZUS pooled across the three readers (72.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.1%-79.3%) was noninferior to that of SVUS (71.4%; 95% CI, 63.1%-78.6%), meeting the statistical criterion for non-inferiority (difference of 0.95%p; 95% CI, -3.8%p-5.7%p). The arterial phase hyperenhancement combined with the 5-minutes washout criterion showed the same sensitivity as that of the > 10-minutes criterion (59.0% vs. 59.0%, p = 0.989), and the specificities were not significantly different (90.9% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.072).

CONCLUSION

SZUS was noninferior to SVUS for diagnosing HCC in at-risk patients using the same diagnostic criteria. No significant improvement in HCC diagnosis was observed by extending the washout time delay from 5 to 10 minutes.

Detection and monitoring of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma from plasma cfDNA fragmentation profiles

Most hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are associated with hepatitis B virus infection (HBV) in China. Early detection of HCC can significantly improve prognosis but is not yet fully clinically feasible. This study aims to develop methods for detecting HCC and studying the carcinogenesis of HBV using plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. Low coverage WGS was performed for 452 participants, including healthy individuals, hepatitis B patients, cirrhosis patients, and HCC patients. Then the sequencing data were processed using various machine learning models based on cfDNA fragmentation profiles for cancer detection. Our best model achieved a sensitivity of 87.10% and a specificity of 88.37%, and it showed an increased sensitivity with higher BCLC stages of HCC. Overall, this study proves the potential of a non-invasive assay based on cfDNA fragmentation profiles for the detection and prognosis of HCC and provides preliminary data on the carcinogenic mechanism of HBV.

Comparison of international guidelines for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and implications for transplant allocation in liver transplantation candidates with gadoxetic acid enhanced liver MRI versus contrast enhanced CT: a prospective study with liver explant histopathological correlation

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performance of international hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) guidelines with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) and contrast-enhanced Computed tomography (CECT) and their impact on liver transplant (LT) allocation in cirrhotic patients with explant histopathology correlation.

METHODS

In this prospective single-centre ethics-approved study, 101 cirrhotic patients were consecutively enrolled with informed consent from the pre-LT clinic. They underwent CECT and EOB-MRI alternately at three monthly intervals until LT or removal from LT list. Two abdominal radiologists, blinded to explant histopathology, independently recorded liver lesions visible on CECT and EOB-MRI. Imaging-based HCC scores were assigned to non-treated liver lesions utilizing Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) and Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA) guidelines. Liver explant histopathology was the reference standard. Simulated LT eligibility was assessed as per Milan criteria (MC) in reference to explant histopathology.

RESULTS

One hundred and three non-treated HCC and 12 non-HCC malignancy were identified at explant histopathology in 34 patients (29 men, 5 women, age 55-73 years). Higher HCC sensitivities of statistical significance were observed with EOB-MRI for LI-RADS 4 + 5, APASL and KLCA compared to LI-RADS 5 and EASL with greatest sensitivity obtained for LIRADS 4 + 5 lesions. HCC sensitivities by all guidelines with both EOB-MRI and CECT were significantly lower if all histopathology-detected HCCs were included in the analysis, compared to imaging-visible lesions only. A significantly greater variation in HCC sensitivity was noted across the guidelines with EOB-MRI compared to CECT. No significant differences in simulated LT eligibility based on MC were observed across the HCC scoring guidelines with EOB-MRI or CECT.

CONCLUSION

HCC sensitivities are variable depending on scoring guideline, lesion size and imaging modality utilised. Prior studies that included only lesions visible on pre-operative imaging overestimate the diagnostic performance of HCC scoring guidelines. Per-lesion differences in HCC diagnosis across these guidelines did not impact patient-level LT eligibility based on MC.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters in the prognosis prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma after thermal ablation: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The postoperative recurrence rate is the main factor affecting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, this study sought to investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative parameters in predicting the recurrence and the survival of HCC patients after thermal ablation.

METHODS

The data of 97 patients with pathologically diagnosed HCC who underwent thermal ablation were retrospectively included in this study. The patients had an average age of 46.6 years (range, 23-79 years), and 79 were male and 18 were female. CEUS follow-up was performed at 1- and 3-month after thermal ablation, then at 6-month intervals thereafter for 5 years. CEUS was performed before thermal ablation, and the results were analyzed quantitatively using CEUS perfusion software (VueBox^®, Bracco, Italy). The ratios of the CEUS quantitative parameters between the HCC lesions and reference liver parenchyma were calculated. The parameters included the average contrast signal intensity (MeanLin), peak enhancement (PE), rising time (RT), fall time (FT), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time (mTT), perfusion index (PI), Wash-in Area Under the Curve (WiAUC), Wash-in Rate (WiR), Wash-in Perfusion Index (WiPI), Wash-out Area Under the Curve (WoAUC), Wash-out Rate (WoR), and WiAUC + WoAUC (WiWoAUC). The correlations between the preoperative CEUS quantitative parameter ratios, the blood laboratory indexes, postoperative recurrence, and survival were analyzed using log-rank tests and a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration period was 79 months (range, 5-145 months). The average recurrence time after ablation was 1-127 months, and the median disease-free survival time was 21 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 96.9%, 92.3%, and 80.6%, respectively. The log-rank tests showed that tumor size, prothrombin time, and WiAUC, WoAUC, and WiWoAUC ratios were predictors of survival, and aspartate aminotransferase was a predictor of recurrence. The Cox regression analysis showed that tumor size [odds ratio (OR): 6.421; 95% CI: 1.434-28.761] and alanine transaminase (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.010-0.742) were predictors of a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS quantitative parameters before thermal ablation and blood laboratory indexes provide potential clinical value for predicting the postoperative recurrence and survival of HCC patients.

Current Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

The role of imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly evolved and expanded beyond the plain radiological confirmation of the tumor based on the typical appearance in a multiphase contrast-enhanced CT or MRI examination. The introduction of hepatobiliary contrast agents has enabled the diagnosis of hepatocarcinogenesis at earlier stages, while the application of ultrasound contrast agents has drastically upgraded the role of ultrasound in the diagnostic algorithms. Newer quantitative techniques assessing blood perfusion on CT and MRI not only allow earlier diagnosis and confident differentiation from other lesions, but they also provide biomarkers for the evaluation of treatment response. As distinct HCC subtypes are identified, their correlation with specific imaging features holds great promise for estimating tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. This review presents the current role of imaging and underlines its critical role in the successful management of patients with HCC.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Radiology has traditionally played a central role in HCC management, ranging from screening of high-risk patients to non-invasive diagnosis, as well as the evaluation of treatment response and post-treatment follow-up. From liver ultrasonography with or without contrast to dynamic multiple phased CT and dynamic MRI with diffusion protocols, great progress has been achieved in the last decade. Throughout the last few years, pathological, biological, genetic, and immune-chemical analyses have revealed several tumoral subtypes with diverse biological behavior, highlighting the need for the re-evaluation of established radiological methods. Considering these changes, novel methods that provide functional and quantitative parameters in addition to morphological information are increasingly incorporated into modern diagnostic protocols for HCC. In this way, differential diagnosis became even more challenging throughout the last few years. Use of liver specific contrast agents, as well as CT/MRI perfusion techniques, seem to not only allow earlier detection and more accurate characterization of HCC lesions, but also make it possible to predict response to treatment and survival. Nevertheless, several limitations and technical considerations still exist. This review will describe and discuss all these imaging modalities and their advances in the imaging of HCC lesions in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers. Sensitivity and specificity rates, method limitations, and technical considerations will be discussed.

Hepatobiliary phases in magnetic resonance imaging using liver-specific contrast for focal lesions in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Challenging lesions, difficult to diagnose through non-invasive methods, constitute an important emotional burden for each patient regarding a still uncertain diagnosis (malignant x benign). In addition, from a therapeutic and prognostic point of view, delay in a definitive diagnosis can lead to worse outcomes. One of the main innovative trends currently is the use of molecular and functional methods to diagnosis. Numerous liver-specific contrast agents have been developed and studied in recent years to improve the performance of liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). More recently, one of the contrast agents introduced in clinical practice is gadoxetic acid (gadoxetate disodium).

AIM

To demonstrate the value of the hepatobiliary phases using gadoxetic acid in MRI for the characterization of focal liver lesions (FLL) in clinical practice.

METHODS

Overall, 302 Lesions were studied in 136 patients who underwent MRI exams using gadoxetic acid for the assessment of FLL. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MRI exams using four stages, and categorized them on a 6-point scale, from 0 (lesion not detected) to 5 (definitely malignant). The stages were: stage 1- images without contrast, stage 2- addition of dynamic phases after contrast (analogous to usual extracellular contrasts), stage 3- addition of hepatobiliary phase after 10 min (HBP 10'), stage 4- hepatobiliary phase after 20 min (HBP 20') in addition to stage 2.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement was high (weighted Kappa coefficient: 0.81- 1) at all stages in the characterization of benign and malignant FLL. The diagnostic weighted accuracy (Az) was 0.80 in stage 1 and was increased to 0.90 in stage 2. Addition of the hepatobiliary phase increased Az to 0.98 in stage 3, which was also 0.98 in stage 4.

CONCLUSION

The hepatobiliary sequences improve diagnostic accuracy. With growing potential in the era of precision medicine, the improvement and dissemination of the method among medical specialties can bring benefits in the management of patients with FLL that are difficult to diagnose.

The benefit of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in biopsies for focal liver lesions: a retrospective study of 820 cases

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the performance between ultrasound (US)- and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS)-guided liver biopsies and evaluated the benefit of CEUS in percutaneous biopsy for focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 820 patients with FLLs, who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy in our center between 2017 and 2019. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether US (n = 362) or CEUS (n = 458) used before a biopsy. The two groups were compared based on specimen adequacy for pathological diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy of liver biopsy. Stratification analysis was performed based on lesion and protocol characteristics to provide detailed information for selecting the imaging guidance for biopsy.

RESULTS

Compared with the US group, the CEUS group yielded more acceptable samples (97.6% vs. 99.4%, p < 0.05) and improved diagnostic accuracy (92.6% vs. 96.4%, p < 0.05), and achieved better sensitivity (92.5% vs. 96.2%, p < 0.05) for liver biopsies, especially in FLLs ≥ 5 cm, heterogeneous hypoechoic FLLs, or FLLs with an obscure boundary. The CEUS group showed significantly higher accuracy compared with the US group pertaining to single-puncture biopsies (100% vs. 92.7%, p < 0.05) or biopsies with punctures ≤ 2 (97.6% vs. 94.3%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS achieved an enhanced success rate for sampling and diagnostic accuracy of liver biopsies, especially in FLLs ≥ 5 cm, heterogeneous hypoechoic FLLs, or FLLs with an obscure boundary. CEUS can be used to decrease the number of punctures needed, which might increase the safety of liver biopsy.

KEY POINTS

• CEUS can help confirm an adequate biopsy site, increasing the sampling success rate and diagnostic accuracy of the liver biopsy. • CEUS can be used to decrease the number of punctures needed to improve the safety of liver biopsy. • It is recommended to use CEUS guidance for liver biopsies, especially with FLLs ≥ 5 cm, heterogeneous hypoechoic FLLs, or FLLs with an obscure boundary.

Two-Phase MDCT Protocol for the Screening of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Screening programmes for cirrhotic patients are based on ultrasound (US) examinations at 6-month intervals, but a US sensitivity of 47% has recently been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate a two-phase MDCT protocol in terms of hepatic nodule detection within a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening situation and to evaluate a reduction in irradiation dose for the 6-monthly checks compared to the classic four-phase protocol. In total, 373 patients with 498 nodules that were suspected to be HCC and ranged from 10 to 30 mm in size were prospectively included. All patients underwent four-phase MDCT with an unenhanced phase, arterial phase (AP), portal phase (PP) and delayed phase (DP). The cumulative irradiation from the repeated 6-monthly MDCT protocol was calculated. Of the 498 nodules, only 4 (0.008%) were only seen in the PP and not in the AP or AP. Of the 319 HCC nodules, 270 (84.6%) had AP hyperenhancement, while 115 had washout in the PP and 224 had washout in the DP. Overall, 222 of the 224 (99.1%) HCC nodules with typical features were seen in the AP and DP. The dose reduction was estimated at 55.4% when using the two-phase protocol (AP and DP). The cumulative irradiation of the two-phase protocol, which was performed every 6 months over 5 years, was 96.5 mSv. MDCT with the two-phase protocol could offer an alternative to ultrasound screening with an interesting risk–benefit trade-off.

Salvage versus Primary Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Twenty-Year Experience Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: Primary liver transplantation (PLT) for HCC represents the ideal treatment. However, since organ shortage increases the risk of drop-out from the waiting list for tumor progression, a new surgical strategy has been developed: Salvage Liver Transplantation (SLT) can be offered as an additional curative strategy for HCC recurrence after liver resection. The aim of this updated meta-analysis is to compare surgical and long-term outcomes of SLT versus PLT for HCC. (2) Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the published papers comparing SLT and PLT up to January 2022. (3) Results: 25 studies describing 11,275 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed no statistical difference in intraoperative blood loss, overall vascular complications, retransplantation rate, and hospital stay in the SLT group compared with the PLT group. However, the SLT group showed a slightly significant lower 5-year OS rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate. (4) Conclusion: meta-analysis advocates the relative safety and feasibility of both Salvage LT and Primary LT strategies. Specifically, SLT seems to have comparable surgical outcomes but slightly poorer long-term survival than PLT.

Deep Learning of Liver Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Predict Microvascular Invasion and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background and Aims

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a well-known risk factor for poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to develop a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to predict MVI, and thus to predict prognosis in patients with HCC.

Methods

A total of 436 patients with surgically resected HCC who underwent preoperative CEUS were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into training (n = 301), validation (n = 102), and test (n = 33) sets. A clinical model (Clinical model), a CEUS video-based DCNN model (CEUS-DCNN model), and a fusion model based on CEUS video and clinical variables (CECL-DCNN model) were built to predict MVI. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the clinical performance of the predicted MVI.

Results

Compared with the Clinical model, the CEUS-DCNN model exhibited similar sensitivity, but higher specificity (71.4% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.03) in the test group. The CECL-DCNN model showed significantly higher specificity (81.0% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.005) and accuracy (78.8% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.009) than the Clinical model, with an AUC of 0.865. The Clinical predicted MVI could not significantly distinguish OS or RFS (both p > 0.05), while the CEUS-DCNN predicted MVI could only predict the earlier recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI 2.92 [1.1–7.75], p = 0.024). However, the CECL-DCNN predicted MVI was a significant prognostic factor for both OS (HR with 95% CI: 6.03 [1.7–21.39], p = 0.009) and RFS (HR with 95% CI: 3.3 [1.23–8.91], p = 0.011) in the test group.

Conclusions

The proposed CECL-DCNN model based on preoperative CEUS video can serve as a noninvasive tool to predict MVI status in HCC, thereby predicting poor prognosis.

Deep learning radiomics for focal liver lesions diagnosis on long-range contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical factors

BACKGROUND

Routine clinical factors play an important role in the clinical diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs); however, they are rarely used in computer-assisted diagnosis. Therefore, we developed a deep learning (DL) radiomics model, and investigated its effectiveness in diagnosing FLLs using long-range contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) cines and clinical factors.

METHODS

Herein, 303 patients with pathologically confirmed FLLs after surgery at three hospitals were retrospectively enrolled and divided into a training cohort (n=203), internal validation (IV) cohort (n=50) from one hospital with the ratio of 4:1, and external validation (EV) cohort (n=50) from the other two hospitals. Four DL radiomics models, namely Four Stream 3D convolutional neural network (FS3DU) (trained with CEUS cines only), FS3DU+A (trained with CEUS cines and alpha fetoprotein), FS3DU+H (trained with CEUS cines and hepatitis), and FS3DU+A+H (trained with CEUS cines, alpha fetoprotein, and hepatitis), were formed based on 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs). They used approximately 20-s preoperative CEUS cines and/or clinical factors to extract spatiotemporal features for the classification of FLLs and the location of the region of interest. The area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic and diagnosis speed were calculated to evaluate the models in the IV and EV cohorts, and they were compared with those of two radiologists. Two-sided Delong tests were used to calculate the statistical differences between the models and radiologists.

RESULTS

FS3DU+A+H, which incorporated CEUS cines, hepatitis, and alpha fetoprotein, achieved the highest area under curve of 0.969 (95% CI: 0.901-1.000) and 0.957 (95% CI: 0.894-1.000) among radiologists and other models in IV and EV cohorts, respectively. A significant difference was observed when comparing FS3DU and radiologist 2 (all P<0.05). The diagnosis speed of all the models was the same (10.76 s per patient), and it was two times faster than those of the radiologists (radiologist 1: 23.74 and 27.75 s; radiologist 2: 25.95 and 29.50 s in IV and EV cohorts, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed DL radiomics demonstrated excellent performance on the benign and malignant diagnosis of FLLs by combining CEUS cines and clinical factors. It could help the individualized characterization of FLLs, and enhance the accuracy of diagnosis in the future.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and third in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-fetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study (computed tomography (CT) or MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is considered valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to surgical resection could improve the prognosis. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma may, therefore, be missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of MRI in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic Test of Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and three other databases to 9 November 2021. We manually searched articles retrieved, contacted experts, handsearched abstract books from meetings held during the last 10 years, and searched for literature in OpenGrey (9 November 2021). Further information was requested by e-mails, but no additional information was provided. No data was obtained through correspondence with investigators. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and we tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 studies, with 4841 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability, we judged 15% (5/34) of studies to be at low concern and 85% (29/34) of studies to be at high concern mostly owing to characteristics of the participants, most of whom were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation, and due to pathology of the explanted liver being the only reference standard. MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 84.4% (95% CI 80.1% to 87.9%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 96.1%) (34 studies, 4841 participants; low-certainty evidence). MRI for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI 77.6% to 89.3%) and specificity 92.9% (95% CI 88.3% to 95.9%) (16 studies, 2150 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that using MRI as a second-line imaging modality to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 16% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 16% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Adapting the Utility of Lipiodol CT in Treating Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction

Multiphase MRI liver is the gold-standard imaging modality for staging hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. Often, small HCCs diagnosed on multiphase MRI are occult on B-mode ultrasound and multiphase CT (MPCT) and thus pose a challenge for loco-regional therapy. We adapted the technique of lipiodol CT in treating two such patients of small HCC.

Methods

Lipiodol-CT involved an intra-arterial lipiodol injection through the hepatic artery followed by a noncontrast CT liver. CT delineated small, hyperdense, lipiodol-laden hepatic nodules, which served as a target for executing ablation of the nodule and also revealed the true disease stage by depicting the additional number of tumors in the liver.

Results

Case one was a 51-year female, known case of chronic hepatitis C who presented with ascites for two months. She was diagnosed with a small HCC (LI-RADS-4) in a cirrhotic liver on multiphase MRI. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was planned, but the mass was not located on ultrasound or multiphase CT. Lipiodol-CT was undertaken, which delineated the lipiodol-laden small HCC, which served as a target for executing ablation. Case 2 was a 55-year male, Child-Pugh A cirrhotic, who had undergone right extended hepatectomy for hepatitis B-related HCC. Follow-up MRI revealed a 5 mm segment III nodule, which had increased in size on repeat MRI at 3 months (LI-RADS-4). This nodule, too, was occult on both ultrasound and MPCT. Lipiodol CT revealed additional multiple, variable-sized lipiodol-laden nodules in the liver remnant. Treatment of trans-arterial chemoembolization was performed at one month. Both patients showed complete response to treatment. Conclusion: Lipiodol CT can be safely used in a new role of facilitating treatment of small HCCs diagnosed on MRI but occult on ultrasonography and MPCT.

Preneoplastic lesions in the liver: Molecular insights and relevance for clinical practice

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are the most frequent primary liver cancers, accounting for approximately 80% and 15%, respectively. HCC carcinogenesis occurs mostly in cirrhosis and is a complex multi-step process, from precancerous lesions (low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nodules) to progressed HCC. During the different stages of liver carcinogenesis, there is an accumulation of pathological, genetic and epigenetic changes leading to initiation, malignant transformation and finally tumour progression. In contrast, a small subset of HCC occurs in normal liver from the transformation of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), a benign hepatocellular tumour. The recent molecular classification enables to stratify HCAs according to their risk of complication, in particular malignant transformation, associated with mutations in exon 3 of the catenin beta 1 (CTNNB1) gene. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) derives from the multistep malignant transformation of preneoplastic lesions, like biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) and intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB), for which a pre-operative diagnosis remains difficult. Different genetic alterations are involved in BilIN and IPNB progression, leading to the development of tubular or intestinal adenocarcinoma. The aims of this review are to describe the main clinical and molecular features of preneoplastic lesions leading to the development of HCC and CCA, their implications in clinical practice and the perspectives for future research.

Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in a population at risk: iodine-enhanced multidetector CT and/or gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of iodine-enhanced multidetector CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 Tesla (T) MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma of patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective, multicentre cohort study.

SETTING

The Gong'an County People's Hospital, Gong'an County, China and the First People's Hospital of Jingzhou City, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Reports of CT, MRI and liver biopsies/histopathology data of a total of 815 patients who at risk were reviewed.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The lesions that possessed detection in the plain scan phase, enhanced arterial phase and/or enhanced portal phase of CT images and the lesions that possessed enhancements in the plain scan phase, enhanced arterial phase, enhanced portal phase and/or hepatobiliary phases of MRI were considered hepatocellular carcinoma. The decision of hepatocellular carcinoma was made based on the current Liver Imaging and Data Reporting System for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

True positive hepatocellular carcinoma (563 vs 521, p=0.0314), true negative hepatocellular carcinoma (122 vs 91, p=0.0275), false positive hepatocellular carcinoma (88 vs 123, p=0.0121), false negative hepatocellular carcinoma (42 vs 80, p=0.0005), specificity (58.10 vs 42.52, p=0.0478) and negative clinical utility (0.1 vs 0.073, p=0.0386) were superior for gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI than those of iodine-enhanced multidetector CT. Sensitivity and accuracy for gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI were 93.06% and 77.40 %, respectively, and those for iodine-enhanced multidetector CT were 86.69% and 75.09 %, respectively. Likelihood to detect hepatocellular carcinoma for gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI was 0-0.894 diagnostic confidence/lesion, and that for iodine-enhanced multidetector CT was 0-0.887 diagnostic confidence/lesion.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI facilitates the confidence of initiation of treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE

4.

Non-invasive imaging criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis B

Background & Aims

Criteria defined by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) enable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis based on imaging in cirrhosis. Non-cirrhotic patients require biopsy given the lower pre-test probability of HCC. The objective of our study was to assess the performance of EASL and LI-RADS criteria for the diagnosis of HCC in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic HBV infection.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study performed at a referral center. We included all patients with HBV without cirrhosis with focal liver lesions who underwent contrast-enhanced CT or MRI at our clinic between 2005-2018. Studies were reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to the diagnosis.

Results

We included 280 patients, median age was 56.8 (IQR 48.2-65.45) years and 223 (80%) were male. In 191 (79%) cases the lesion was found as a result of screening. Cirrhosis was excluded based on pathology in 252 (90%) cases. We assessed 338 nodules: 257 (76%) HCC, 40 (12%) non-HCC malignant lesions, and 41 (12%) benign lesions. EASL criteria and LR-5/LR-tumor-in-vein (TIV) categories had a 100% agreement in categorizing lesions as HCC, and 226 nodules (67%) were classified as HCCs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 82.1 (76.9-86.6), 81.5 (71.3-89.2), 93.4 (89.3-96.2), and 58.9 (49.2-68.1), respectively. When the pre-test probability of HCC is >70%, estimated as a PAGE-B score above 9, and EASL or LR-5/LR-TIV criteria are met, post-test probability would be >90%.

Conclusions

EASL criteria and LR-5/LR-TIV categories show a positive predictive value in patients with HBV without cirrhosis that is comparable to that seen in patients with cirrhosis. These criteria can be used when the pre-test probability of HCC is >70%.

Lay summary

Current guidelines recommend performing a biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of presumed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients without cirrhosis. We showed that specific imaging criteria had a 100% agreement for categorizing lesions as HCC, with a positive predictive value of 93.4%. These imaging criteria could be used to diagnose HCC in HBV patients without cirrhosis with a pre-test probability of HCC of ≥70%, avoiding the need for a liver biopsy.

•

Imaging criteria defined by the EASL and LI-RADS enable the diagnosis of HCC without biopsy in patients with cirrhosis.

•

A biopsy is recommended in all patients without cirrhosis.

•

Imaging criteria had a good performance in patients with HBV infection without cirrhosis when pre-test probability was >70%.

•

HCC may be diagnosed based solely on imaging criteria in patients with HBV subject to HCC screening (i.e. PAGE-B score >9).

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and fourth in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, computed tomography (CT) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-foetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma is, therefore, missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of CT in people with chronic liver disease, who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector, multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease, either in a surveillance programme or in a clinical setting. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Trials Register, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Diagnostic-Test-Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science until 4 May 2021. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 studies, with a total of 3101 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time-interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability in the patient selection domain, we judged 14% (3/21) of studies to be at low concern and 86% (18/21) of studies to be at high concern owing to characteristics of the participants who were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation. CT for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 77.5% (95% CI 70.9% to 82.9%) and specificity 91.3% (95% CI 86.5% to 94.5%) (21 studies, 3101 participants; low-certainty evidence). CT for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 71.4% (95% CI 60.3% to 80.4%) and specificity 92.0% (95% CI 86.3% to 95.5%) (10 studies, 1854 participants; low-certainty evidence). In the three studies at low concern for applicability (861 participants), we found sensitivity 76.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 91.5%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI 57.0% to 98.1%). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the clinical pathway for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, CT has roles as a confirmatory test for hepatocellular carcinoma lesions, and for staging assessment. We found that using CT in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 22.5% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 8.7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 28.6% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 8% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Current and Emerging Tools for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer‐related mortality worldwide. Early detection of HCC enables patients to avail curative therapies that can improve patient survival. Current international guidelines advocate for the enrollment of patients at high risk for HCC, like those with cirrhosis, in surveillance programs that perform ultrasound every 6 months. In recent years, many studies have further characterized the utility of established screening strategies and have introduced new promising tools for HCC surveillance. In this review, we provide an overview of the most promising new imaging modalities and biomarkers for the detection of HCC. We discuss the role of imaging tools like ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the early detection of HCC, and describe recent innovations which can potentially enhance their applicability, including contrast enhanced ultrasound, low‐dose CT scans, and abbreviated MRI. Next, we outline the data supporting the use of three circulating biomarkers (i.e., alpha‐fetoprotein [AFP], AFP lens culinaris agglutinin‐reactive fraction, and des‐gamma‐carboxy prothrombin) in HCC surveillance, and expand on multiple emerging liquid biopsy biomarkers, including methylated cell‐free DNA (cfDNA), cfDNA mutations, extracellular vesicles, and circulating tumor cells. These promising new imaging modalities and biomarkers have the potential to improve early detection, and thus improve survival, in patients with HCC.

Reproducibility of CT-Based Hepatocellular Carcinoma Radiomic Features across Different Contrast Imaging Phases: A Proof of Concept on SORAMIC Trial Data

Simple Summary

Radiomics has been reported to have potential for correlating with clinical outcomes. However, handcrafted radiomic features (HRFs)—the quantitative features extracted from medical images—are limited by their sensitivity to variations in scanning parameters. Furthermore, radiomics analyses require big data with good quality to achieve desirable performances. In this study, we investigated the reproducibility of HRFs between scans acquired with the same scanning parameters except for the imaging phase (arterial and portal venous phases) to assess the possibilities of merging scans from different phases or replacing missing scans from a phase with other phases to increase data entries. Additionally, we assessed the potential of ComBat harmonization to remove batch effects attributed to this variation. Our results show that the majority of HRFs were not reproducible between the arterial and portal venous phases before or after ComBat harmonization. We provide a guide for analyzing scans of different imaging phases.

Abstract

Handcrafted radiomic features (HRFs) are quantitative imaging features extracted from regions of interest on medical images which can be correlated with clinical outcomes and biologic characteristics. While HRFs have been used to train predictive and prognostic models, their reproducibility has been reported to be affected by variations in scan acquisition and reconstruction parameters, even within the same imaging vendor. In this work, we evaluated the reproducibility of HRFs across the arterial and portal venous phases of contrast-enhanced computed tomography images depicting hepatocellular carcinomas, as well as the potential of ComBat harmonization to correct for this difference. ComBat harmonization is a method based on Bayesian estimates that was developed for gene expression arrays, and has been investigated as a potential method for harmonizing HRFs. Our results show that the majority of HRFs are not reproducible between the arterial and portal venous imaging phases, yet a number of HRFs could be used interchangeably between those phases. Furthermore, ComBat harmonization increased the number of reproducible HRFs across both phases by 1%. Our results guide the pooling of arterial and venous phases from different patients in an effort to increase cohort size, as well as joint analysis of the phases.

Search for Effective Serum Tumor Markers for Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Hepatitis C

The aim of the study was to identify the most effective serum tumor markers for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on the combination of diagnostic characteristics and correlations.

Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths, and radiological imaging and locoregional therapies are essential for the management of patients with HCC.

SUMMARY

In cirrhotic patients, a characteristic imaging pattern establishes the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC with acceptable sensitivity and high specificity. In addition to diagnosis, imaging is used in the staging of patients and treatment allocation. Multiparametric MRI with hepatospecific contrast agents improves lesion detection, characterization, and treatment allocation; recently described imaging criteria allow identification of precursor lesions. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been established in the treatment of patients with HCC at the early and intermediate stages, respectively. Microwave ablation has been described as an alternative to RFA in selected cases. Imaging-guided brachytherapy, a catheter-based radiotherapy technique, offers advantages to overcome some limitations of the aforementioned therapies, including the tumor location and size. Currently, no adjuvant therapy is recommended after RFA or TACE, but several new drugs are under evaluation. Furthermore, although the exact role of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in HCC still needs to be defined, it is an alternative to systemic agents in patients with intolerance, and additional benefit has been shown in selected subgroups. Additionally, SIRT offers an alternate to TACE with higher objective response rates in patients who needs bridging before transplantation.

KEY MESSAGES

New imaging criteria improved lesion detection in patients at a risk for HCC, and advances in interventional therapies expanded the range of patients eligible for locoregional treatments.

Parenchymal Extinction Mimicking Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Patient with Chronic Hepatitis B-Related Liver Cirrhosis

Parenchymal extinction is characterized by the irreversible loss of hepatocytes and their eventual replacement by fibrous tissue, along with the alteration of the sinusoidal architecture and the obstruction of the small portal and hepatic veins. In clinical practice, radiologic modalities are not sufficient for differentiating between parenchymal extinction and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Herein, we present a case of parenchymal extinction mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient with chronic hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Update of the consensus document of the AEEH, AEC, SEOM, SERAM, SERVEI, and SETH

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver neoplasm and one of the most common causes of death in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. In parallel, with recognition of the clinical relevance of this cancer, major new developments have recently appeared in its diagnosis, prognostic assessment and in particular, in its treatment. Therefore, the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH) has driven the need to update the clinical practice guidelines, once again inviting all the societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease to participate in the drafting and approval of the document: Spanish Society for Liver Transplantation (SETH), Spanish Society of Diagnostic Radiology (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC) and Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). The clinical practice guidelines published in 2016 and accepted as National Health System Clinical Practice Guidelines were taken as the reference documents, incorporating the most important recent advances. The scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation is based on the GRADE system.