Clinical outcomes and management of patients with chronic hepatitis B and liver stiffness measurement in the grey zone

Histological severity, clinical outcomes and impact of antiviral treatment in indeterminate phase of chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Current international guidelines recommend close monitoring and evaluation of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the indeterminate phase, and treatment of patients at high risk of adverse outcomes. Clinical outcomes and the effect of antiviral therapy on the indeterminate phase remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cirrhosis, and hepatic decompensation, and the effect of antiviral therapy, in the indeterminate phase.

METHODS

Two investigators independently searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from 1/1/2007 to 31/12/2023. Three investigators independently assessed study eligibility and quality. We included cohort studies and a randomised-controlled trial, allowing for calculation of the incidence rate of adverse clinical outcomes, and cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of moderate-to-severe inflammation and different degrees of fibrosis. Incidence rates and prevalence were pooled using generalised linear mixed-effects models and random-effects models, respectively.

RESULTS

One hundred and three studies (70 case-control studies [18,739 patients], 32 cohort studies [15,118 patients], and one RCT [160 patients]) were included. The annual incidence rate of HCC in patients in the indeterminate phase was 0.32% (95% CI 0.21-0.48%, I2 = 85.7%), and those of cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation were 0.67% (95% CI 0.30-1.49%, I2 = 94.3%) and 0.34% (95% CI 0.17-0.69%, I2 = 51.8%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of moderate-to-severe liver inflammation, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 40.7%, 39.7%, 17.9%, and 7.2%, respectively. Use of antiviral therapy was associated with a lower risk of HCC in patients in the indeterminate phase (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.79, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the indeterminate phase are at risk of developing advanced liver disease and HCC. Although inherent heterogeneity across studies limited the evidence to support expanding treatment to all patients in the indeterminate phase, antiviral therapy may reduce the risk of HCC development in high-risk subgroups.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Current international guidelines recommend close monitoring and evaluation of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the indeterminate phase, in whom antiviral treatment is not always indicated. Based on the systematic review and meta-analysis with significant heterogeneity across studies, patients in the indeterminate phase are at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma, cirrhosis, and hepatic decompensation. Meta-regression findings on platelet count, positive HBeAg, and age highlighted the importance of liver fibrosis assessment, accurate phase classification, and timely detection of phase transition to identify antiviral treatment indications, supporting current guideline recommendations. Antiviral treatment may reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the high-risk subgroups of patients in the indeterminate phase.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024537095.

Screening patients in general practice for advanced chronic liver disease using an innovative IT solution: The Liver Toolkit

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with undiagnosed advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) is a public health challenge. Patients with advanced fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis have much better outcomes than those with decompensated disease and may be eligible for interventions to prevent disease progression.

METHODS

A cloud-based software solution ("the Liver Toolkit") was developed to access primary care practice software to identify patients at risk of ACLD. Clinical history and laboratory results were extracted to calculate aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and fibrosis 4 scores. Patients identified were recalled for assessment, including Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) via transient elastography. Those with an existing diagnosis of cirrhosis were excluded.

RESULTS

Existing laboratory results of more than 32,000 adults across nine general practices were assessed to identify 703 patients at increased risk of ACLD (2.2% of the cohort). One hundred seventy-nine patients (26%) were successfully recalled, and 23/179 (13%) were identified to have ACLD (LSM ≥10.0 kPa) (10% found at indeterminate risk [LSM 8.0-9.9 kPa] and 77% low risk of fibrosis [LSM <8.0 kPa]). In most cases, the diagnosis of liver disease was new, with the most common etiology being metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (n=20, 83%). Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index ≥1.0 and fibrosis 4 ≥3.25 had a positive predictive value for detecting ACLD of 19% and 24%, respectively. Patients who did not attend recall had markers of more severe disease with a higher median aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index score (0.57 vs. 0.46, p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel information technology system successfully screened a large primary care cohort using existing laboratory results to identify patients at increased risk ACLD. More than 1 in 5 patients recalled were found to have liver disease requiring specialist follow-up.

Further understanding of chronic hepatitis B in the indeterminate phase or in the grey zone

The prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are still facing great challenges. Even though the Chinese Medical Association (CMA) guidelines for the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (version 2022) have expanded the antiviral treatment indications, there is still a certain proportion of HBV infections that do not meet the antiviral treatment indications, known as the indeterminate phase or the gray zone (GZ). However, the current interpretation and judgment criteria for the indeterminate phase or GZ of HBV infection are not uniform, and their connections and differences are not very clear. Different studies focus on different subjects. Regardless of the identification of the indeterminate phase or GZ, the purpose is to timely and accurately determine the progression of CHB and whether timely treatment is needed. Based on the understanding that the GZ corresponds to the "classification of antiviral treatment indication" and that the indeterminate phase corresponds to the "natural history staging", this article elaborates on the further understanding of CHB in the indeterminate phase or in the GZ. This paper argues that the GZ refers to cases that do not receive treatment for not meeting the antiviral treatment indications, while the indeterminate phase refers to cases that are difficult to be clearly attributed to a natural history stage for not meeting the natural history staging criteria. Thus, the GZ should include the indeterminate phase, and they are not parallel concepts. According to the CMA guidelines (version 2022), patients in the indeterminate phase of GZ are recommended for antiviral treatment; according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines (2017), antiviral therapy is recommended for patients in the immune control phase and the indeterminate phase of GZ.

Staging and clinical characteristics of pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A retrospective cohort study from Nanjing, China

AIM

To investigate the immune status of Chinese chronic hepatitis B (CHB) pregnant women and their clinical characteristics.

METHODS

About 1544 CHB pregnant women without antiviral therapy from 2013 to 2018 were selected from the hospital records. The definition of immune status is based on American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2018 Hepatitis B Guidance, and those who did not meet any criteria of the immune status were referred to in the gray zones (GZ).

RESULTS

There were 284 patients in the immune-tolerance phase, 72 patients in the HBeAg-positive immune active phase, 553 patients in the inactive phase, 61 patients in the HBeAg-negative immune active phase. Of note, 574 (37.18%) patients did not fit into any of the above phases were defined as the GZ. Patients with elevated ALT had a higher rate of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Mother to child HBV transmission was rare (only two cases) and occurred in mothers in the immune-tolerant phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that more than one-third of CHB pregnant women were classified into the GZ. In standard stages, advanced age is associated with HBeAg-negative and a higher cesarean rate in the inactive phase. The incidence of ICP was higher in immune active phases, including GB and GD. The probability of mother-to-child transmission in gray zones is low.

Liver Stiffness Is a Predictor of Rebleeding in Patients With Hepatitis B-Related Cirrhosis: A Real-World Cohort Study

Background: Esophageal vein rebleeding is a life-threatening complication of liver cirrhosis. However, the role of non-invasive methods that were developed to evaluate the severity of chronic liver disease, especially in rebleeding, remains unclear. Aims: To evaluate the performance of liver stiffness and non-invasive fibrosis scores in predicting esophageal vein rebleeding in hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhotic patients. Methods: A prospective analysis of 194 HBV patients between 2017 and 2021 was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and time-dependent ROC curves were used to assess the power for predicting rebleeding with non-invasive fibrosis score and liver stiffness. Results: During the median follow-up time of 68.28 weeks, 55 patients experienced rebleeding. In the entire cohort, the area under the ROC curve for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) predicting for rebleeding was 0.837, with a cut-off value of 17.79 kPa, and the time-dependent ROC curve also showed stable prediction performance of LSM. The predictive ability of the non-invasive fibrosis score was less than that of LSM, and there were statistical differences. Moreover, patients using non-selective beta-blockers and HBV DNA-negative patients experienced significantly reduced rebleeding. Conclusions: Compared with non-invasive fibrosis scores, LSM can more simply and accurately predict rebleeding events of hepatitis B liver cirrhosis.