Early ALT response to corticosteroid treatment distinguishes idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury from autoimmune hepatitis

Insights into medication-induced liver injury: Understanding and management strategies

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has increasingly become a major concern in Western countries since the late 1960s, with an estimated annual incidence of 13.9-19.1 cases per 100,000 people. DILI is a significant cause of acute liver failure, exhibiting a high mortality rate of 10-50 %. Its etiology includes medications, herbal products, and dietary supplements, exacerbated by pre-existing liver conditions, sonorities, pregnancy, and nutritional deficiencies. It is categorized into intrinsic and idiosyncratic reactions. Intrinsic DILI, dose-dependent and predictable, is primarily caused by substances like paracetamol, which leads to liver toxicity through direct metabolic pathways. In contrast, idiosyncratic DILI is less common, unpredictable, and affects susceptible individuals, with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, and cardiovascular agents frequently implicated in hospitals. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, bile salt export inhibition, and stress on the endoplasmic reticulum are some DILI-related pathophysiology. Diagnosis relies on biochemical tests, serological markers, radiological investigations, and liver biopsy. Management strategies emphasize the identification and cessation of the offending drugs, supportive care, and specific treatment options targeted to the culprit drugs. Management depends on the severity and nature of the injury.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if untreated, often leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of AIH was published in 2011. Since then, our understanding of AIH has advanced in many areas. This update to the previous guideline was commissioned by the BSG and developed by a multidisciplinary group. The aim of this guideline is to review and summarise the current evidence, in order to inform and guide diagnosis and management of patients with AIH and its variant syndromes. The main focus is on AIH in adults, but the guidelines should also be relevant to older children and adolescents.

Effect of Bacillus subtilis isolated from yaks on D-galactose-induced oxidative stress and hepatic damage in mice

Acute hepatic injury is a severe condition that is always accompanied by oxidative stress and inflammation, seriously threatening the health of the host. Probiotics have been shown to be involved in the regulation of antioxidant system and gut microbiota activity, but studies on the effects of yak derived Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) on acute liver injury and oxidative stress remain scarce. Here, we aim to explore the ameliorative effects of B. subtilis isolated from yaks on oxidative stress and hepatic injury caused by D-galactose, as well as the underlying processes. Results indicated that B. subtilis administration, particularly the BS3, significantly mitigated hepatic damage induced by D-galactose in mice as evidenced by ameliorating liver tissue damage as well as decreasing ALT (p < 0.05) and AST (p < 0.05) levels. Additionally, the B. subtilis intervention was demonstrated to enhance the antioxidant system in D-galactose-exposed mice, as manifested by increased T-AOC and SOD, alongside a decrease in MDA levels (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, B. subtilis intervention could effectively mitigate oxidative damage via modulating the Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway. Importantly, B. subtilis exhibited a pronounced protective effect against D-galactose-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction through improving tight junction proteins. The gut microbiota results suggest that BS3 alters the abundance of some gut flora such as Firmicutes phylum and Oscillibacter and Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136 genera, which affects the composition of the gut microbiota and reverses the decrease in the microbial richness index in mice. In summary, these findings demonstrated that B. subtilis isolated from yaks serve as a promising candidate to ameliorate oxidative damage and hepatic injury. Meanwhile, the positive regulation effect of B. subtilis on gut microbiota and intestinal mucosal barrier may be one of its underlying mechanisms to alleviate oxidative stress and hepatic injury.

Propensity score matching-based analysis of the effect of corticosteroids in treating severe drug-induced liver injury

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is no conventional treatment for patients with severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) except for discontinuation of liver injury drugs and symptomatic supportive therapy. Opinions on whether corticosteroids can be used to treat severe DILI are conflicting, and most of the relevant clinical studies are case reports or retrospective studies, which still need to be supported by high-level evidence-based medical studies. This study aimed to evaluate the effect and tolerance of corticosteroids in patients with severe DILI. Risk factors associated with patient failure to cure were also explored.

METHODS

Propensity score matching based on nearest-neighbor 1:1 matching was used to screen severe DILI patients in the corticosteroids and control groups. Severe DILI was defined as elevated serum ALT and/or ALP with TBIL≥5 ULN (5 mg/dL or 85.5 μmol/L) with or without INR ≥1.5. Patients were treated with conventional therapy combined with corticosteroids in the corticosteroids group and only conventional therapy in the control group.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients, 73 each in the corticosteroids and control groups, were included in this study. By analyzing the entire cohort, we found no significant difference in cure rates between patients in the corticosteroid group and control group (34.2% vs. 20.5 %, p = 0.095), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the two groups (20.5% vs. 20.5 %, p = 1.000). However, TBIL decreased more in the corticosteroids group on day 7 (89.2 ± 107.6 μmol/L vs. 58.8 ± 70.7 μmol/L, p = 0.046). In subgroup analyses, patients whose TBIL remained elevated despite conventional treatment had a higher TBIL decline on day 7,14 after use of corticosteroid (99.2 ± 98.5μmol/L vs. -23.3 ± 50.4μmol/L, p < 0.001; 120 ± 119.1μmol/L vs. 61.2 ± 98.5μmol/L, p = 0.047). The cure rate of patients in the corticosteroid group was significantly higher than that of the control group (36.1 % versus 4.5 %, p = 0.016). The proportion of patients with TBIL <85.5 μmol/L was also significantly higher in the corticosteroid group than in the control group at day 7 (p = 0.016) and day 14 (p = 0.004) after treatment. In the subgroup analysis of patients with different clinical phenotypes, the causative agent was herbal, autoimmune antibody-positive and 40 % < PTA ≤ 50 % of patients, corticosteroid use did not increase the cure rate of the patients. Univariate and multifactorial analyses found corticosteroid use to be a protective factor for failure to cure in patients with severe DILI (p < 0.001, OR:0.191,95 % CI:0.072-0.470), and peak TBIL to be a risk factor (p = 0.003, OR:1.016,95 % CI:1.007-1.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of corticosteroids could not increase the cure rate in patients with severe DILI, but it could rapidly reduce the patient's TBIL at an earlier stage. Corticosteroids could also promote curing in patients with elevated TBIL after conventional treatment. Corticosteroid use was a protective factor for failure to cure in patients with severe DILI and peak TBIL was a risk factor.

[Drug-induced autoimmune-like liver injury]

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare yet potentially life-threatening disease. Besides intrinsic DILI, which is mainly caused by paracetamol overdosing and which is dose-dependent and predictable, there is idiosyncratic DILI-an unpredictable and dose-independent injury of the liver caused by certain medications that only occurs in a minority of patients taking this drug. The reason why some patients react with DILI towards a specific drug is still unknown. However, the immune system plays a central role, which is underlined by the association of certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms and DILI caused by specific drug classes. Due to the immunological processes that lead to the liver injury in DILI, there are great overlaps regarding laboratory and histological parameters between DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Differentiating DILI and AIH can therefore be challenging, especially at the time of presentation. In addition, there are other immunologically mediated DILI phenotypes, in particular the newly defined drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) and liver injuries caused by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). DI-ALH is characterized by autoimmune features and good responses towards corticosteroids, with the difference that DI-ALH mostly does not relapse after discontinuation of corticosteroids. CPI-induced liver injury has become more frequent with the rising use of those drugs and is characterized by a distinct histopathological pattern with granulomatous hepatitis and infiltration dominated by cytotoxic T cells. Similarly, the recently recognized liver injury following vaccinations also shows an autoimmune phenotype; however, in contrast to AIH, cytotoxic T cells seem to dominate the inflammatory infiltrates in the liver.

Defining characteristics and long-term prognosis of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-AILH) is poorly defined and more data are required to better characterise and manage this disease entity.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, histology and long-term outcomes of DI-AILH compared with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study reviewed 28 DI-AILH and 39 AIH patients in a single centre. The new (2022) and simplified (2008) AIH histology criteria were used to assess DI-AILH.

RESULTS

DI-AILH were more likely to present with jaundice (p = 0.004) and higher bilirubin levels (p = 0.04) than AIH. AIH patients had higher rate of immunosuppression (IS) use including second- and third-line agents, though the time to reach biochemical remission were comparable. AIH patients had more advanced fibrosis than DI-AILH (Ishak fibrosis score 3.5 vs. 1.9, p < 0.0001). DI-AILH more commonly had eosinophilic aggregates (18% vs. 3%, p = 0.031) and less commonly showed plasma cell aggregates (61% vs. 97%, p < 0.001) than AIH. The simplified AIH histology criteria identified 1 atypical histology within the DI-AILH cohort, although this patient required long-term IS. The new AIH histology criteria classified 23 (82%) as likely AIH and 5 (18%) as possible AIH. Two of the possible DI-AILH did not require IS and one patient had successful IS withdrawal. Four DI-AILH patients with fibrosis stage ≤3 had successful IS withdrawal compared with none in the AIH group. Four patients underwent liver transplantation (LT) in both cohorts with significantly shorter time to LT in DI-AILH as the indication was for (sub)acute liver failure. Two DI-AILH patients died within 60 days of LT.

CONCLUSION

The new AIH histology criteria may be better at identifying DI-AILH. Immunosuppression withdrawal in those without significant fibrosis may be considered. DI-AILH is at risk of (sub)acute liver failure and early discussions with a transplant centre would be desirable.

Chronic Drug-Induced Liver Injury from Labetalol during the Postpartum Period: A Case Report

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a common cause of transaminitis in pregnancy. A 34-year-old G3P2012 presented 3 weeks postpartum for preeclampsia with severe features. After receiving acute antihypertensive medications, she was discharged home with labetalol. She presented 5 months later with general malaise, scleral icterus, nausea, and mild right upper quadrant pain and found to have significantly elevated transaminitis. She had a negative infectious, autoimmune, biliary, and steatohepatitis workup. A liver biopsy was performed supporting the diagnosis of DILI. After patient self-discontinued labetalol, her hepatitis significantly improved. However, she developed chronic DILI and liver enzymes normalized during her subsequent pregnancy at 34 weeks. Patient's written consent was obtained for this case report. Chronic DILI secondary to labetalol use is a rare and potentially fatal condition that should be considered on the differential for transaminitis during pregnancy and postpartum period.

Utility of Liver Biopsy in the Diagnosis and Management of Possible Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients Receiving Antituberculosis Therapy: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) secondary to ATT treatment (TB-DILI) is reported in 2-28% of patients. We present here a series of clinical cases of suspected DILI arising during antituberculosis treatment, studied with the aid of liver biopsy.

METHODS

this was a retrospective descriptive study including 10 tuberculosis patients who underwent liver biopsy for suspected TB-DILI at the "Lazzaro Spallanzani" Institute from 2017 to 2022.

RESULTS

Ten patients who underwent LB were extracted from the database and included in the retrospective study cohort. According to the clinical classification, eight patients had hepatocellular liver injury, one patient had cholestatic injury, and another had mixed-type injury. Histopathological diagnosis revealed liver damage due to DILI in 5/10 (50%) cases. In one case, liver biopsy showed necrotizing granulomatous hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe and persistent elevation of hepatic transaminases, hepatic cholestasis despite discontinuation of therapy, and other suspected hepatic conditions are indications for liver biopsy, which remains a valuable tool in the evaluation of selected tuberculosis patients with suspected DILI for many reasons. However, the decision to perform a liver biopsy should be based on clinical judgment, considering the benefits and risks of the procedure.

Nomenclature, diagnosis and management of drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH): An expert opinion meeting report

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can mimic almost all other liver disorders. A phenotype increasingly ascribed to drugs is autoimmune-like hepatitis (ALH). This article summarises the major topics discussed at a joint International Conference held between the Drug-Induced Liver Injury consortium and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. DI-ALH is a liver injury with laboratory and/or histological features that may be indistinguishable from those of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Previous studies have revealed that patients with DI-ALH and those with idiopathic AIH have very similar clinical, biochemical, immunological and histological features. Differentiating DI-ALH from AIH is important as patients with DI-ALH rarely require long-term immunosuppression and the condition often resolves spontaneously after withdrawal of the implicated drug, whereas patients with AIH mostly require long-term immunosuppression. Therefore, revision of the diagnosis on long-term follow-up may be necessary in some cases. More than 40 different drugs including nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, infliximab, herbal and dietary supplements (such as Khat and Tinospora cordifolia) have been implicated in DI-ALH. Understanding of DI-ALH is limited by the lack of specific markers of the disease that could allow for a precise diagnosis, while there is similarly no single feature which is diagnostic of AIH. We propose a management algorithm for patients with liver injury and an autoimmune phenotype. There is an urgent need to prospectively evaluate patients with DI-ALH systematically to enable definitive characterisation of this condition.

Advances in Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Issues: New Clinical and Mechanistic Analysis Due to Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method Use

Clinical and mechanistic considerations in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) remain challenging topics when they are derived from mere case narratives or iDILI cases without valid diagnosis. To overcome these issues, attempts should be made on pathogenetic aspects based on published clinical iDILI cases firmly diagnosed by the original RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) or the RUCAM version updated in 2016. Analysis of RUCAM-based iDILI cases allowed for evaluating immune and genetic data obtained from the serum and the liver of affected patients. For instance, strong evidence for immune reactions in the liver of patients with RUCAM-based iDILI was provided by the detection of serum anti-CYP 2E1 due to drugs like volatile anesthetics sevoflurane and desflurane, partially associated with the formation of trifluoroacetyl (TFA) halide as toxic intermediates that form protein adducts and may generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). This is accompanied by production of anti-TFA antibodies detected in the serum of these patients. Other RUCAM-based studies on serum ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies) and SMA (anti-smooth muscle antibodies) associated with AIDILI (autoimmune DILI) syn DIAIH (drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis) provide additional evidence of immunological reactions with monocytes as one of several promoting immune cells. In addition, in the blood plasma of patients, mediators like the cytokines IL-22, IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP), IL-6, IL-10, IL 12p70, IL-17A, IL-23, IP-10, or chemokines such as CD206 and sCD163 were found in DILI due to anti-tuberculosis drugs as ascertained by the prospective updated RUCAM, which scored a high causality. RUCAM-based analysis also provided compelling evidence of genetic factors such as HLA (human leucocyte antigen) alleles contributing to initiate iDILI by a few drugs. In conclusion, analysis of published RUCAM-based iDILI cases provided firm evidence of immune and genetic processes involved in iDILI caused by specific drugs.

Molecular Idiosyncratic Toxicology of Drugs in the Human Liver Compared with Animals: Basic Considerations

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) occurs in patients exposed to drugs at recommended doses that leads to idiosyncratic DILI and provides an excellent human model with well described clinical features, liver injury pattern, and diagnostic criteria, based on patients assessed for causality using RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) as original method of 1993 or its update of 2016. Overall, 81,856 RUCAM based DILI cases have been published until mid of 2020, allowing now for an analysis of mechanistic issues of the disease. From selected DILI cases with verified diagnosis by using RUCAM, direct evidence was provided for the involvement of the innate and adapted immune system as well as genetic HLA (Human Leucocyte Antigen) genotypes. Direct evidence for a role of hepatic immune systems was substantiated by (1) the detection of anti-CYP (Cytochrome P450) isoforms in the plasma of affected patients, in line with the observation that 65% of the drugs most implicated in DILI are metabolized by a range of CYP isoforms, (2) the DIAIH (drug induced autoimmune hepatitis), a subgroup of idiosyncratic DILI, which is characterized by high RUCAM causality gradings and the detection of plasma antibodies such as positive serum anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), rarely also anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), (3) the effective treatment with glucocorticoids in part of an unselected RUCAM based DILI group, and (4) its rare association with the immune-triggered Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) caused by a small group of drugs. Direct evidence of a genetic basis of idiosyncratic DILI was shown by the association of several HLA genotypes for DILI caused by selected drugs. Finally, animal models of idiosyncratic DILI mimicking human immune and genetic features are not available and further search likely will be unsuccessful. In essence and based on cases of DILI with verified diagnosis using RUCAM for causality evaluation, there is now substantial direct evidence that immune mechanisms and genetics can account for idiosyncratic DILI by many but not all implicated drugs, which may help understand the mechanistic background of the disease and contribute to new approaches of therapy and prevention.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown cause that may progress to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver failure if diagnosis is overlooked and treatment delayed. The clinical presentation is often that of acute hepatitis, sometimes very severe; less frequently, it can be insidious or completely asymptomatic. The disease can affect people of any age and is more common in women; its incidence and prevalence seem to be on the rise worldwide. An abnormal immune response targeting liver autoantigens and inducing persistent and self-perpetuating liver inflammation is the pathogenic mechanism of the disease. A specific set of autoantibodies, increased IgG concentrations, and histological demonstration of interface hepatitis and periportal necrosis are the diagnostic hallmarks of autoimmune hepatitis. Prompt response to treatment with corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory drugs is almost universal and supports the diagnosis. The aims of treatment are to induce and maintain long term remission of liver inflammation. Treatment can often even reverse liver fibrosis, thus preventing progression to advanced cirrhosis and its complications. Most patients need lifelong maintenance therapy, and repeated follow-up in experienced hands improves the quality of care and quality of life for affected patients.

Treatment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Current pharmacotherapy options of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remain under discussion and are now evaluated in this analysis. Needless to say, the use of the offending drug must be stopped as soon as DILI is suspected. Normal dosed drugs may cause idiosyncratic DILI, and drugs taken in overdose commonly lead to intrinsic DILI. Empirically used but not substantiated regarding efficiency by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is the intravenous antidote treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with intrinsic DILI by N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) overdose. Good data recommending pharmacotherapy in idiosyncratic DILI caused by hundreds of different drugs are lacking. Indeed, a recent analysis revealed that just eight RCTs have been published, and in only two out of eight trials were DILI cases evaluated for causality by the worldwide used Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), representing overall a significant methodology flaw, as results of DILI RCTs lacking RUCAM are misleading since many DILI cases are known to be attributable erroneously to nondrug alternative causes. In line with these major shortcomings and mostly based on anecdotal reports, glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immuno-suppressants may be given empirically in carefully selected patients with idiosyncratic DILI exhibiting autoimmune features or caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), while some patients with cholestatic DILI may benefit from ursodeoxycholic acid use; in other patients with drug-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) and coagulopathy risks, the indication for anticoagulants should be considered. In view of many other mechanistic factors such as the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 with a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ferroptosis with toxicity of intracellular iron, and modification of the gut microbiome, additional therapy options may be available in the future. In summation, stopping the offending drug is still the first line of therapy for most instances of acute DILI, while various therapies are applied empirically and not based on good data from RCTs awaiting further trials using the updated RUCAM that asks for strict exclusion and inclusion details like liver injury criteria and provides valid causality rankings of probable and highly probable grades.

Diagnostic value of a liver biopsy in patients with an acute liver failure or acute liver injury

OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic value of liver biopsy in patients with acute liver injury or acute liver failure (ALI/ALF) was investigated.

METHODS

Data from the initial event and follow-up visits were retrospectively analyzed in all patients with a liver biopsy during ALI/ALF from January 2010 to May 2020 at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 66 patients. Post-biopsy hemorrhage occurred in 2 of 66 but was self-limited. In five patients suspected liver involvement by a systemic extrahepatic disease was confirmed and excluded in eight patients. In 4 of 66 patients, the etiology of ALI/ALF remained unknown. Liver biopsy hinted at the etiology of ALI/ALF in 2 of 6 patients with rare diagnoses (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: 2 of 66; ischemic liver injury: 1 of 66, ALI/ALF due to a systemic infection: 3 of 66). In 31 of 34 patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), histopathology suggested DILI; in further 2 patients, DILI was among the differential diagnoses. However, DILI was also the histopathologically preferred diagnosis in 12 of 15 patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Only in 3 of 15 patients, histopathology was considered compatible with AIH. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and autoantibodies during ALI/ALF were higher in patients with AIH than with DILI. Patients with AIH did not show a more pronounced biochemical response to corticosteroids in the first 10 days of treatment than patients with DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver biopsy is indispensable when liver involvement by an extrahepatic disease is suspected. To distinguish AIH from DILI in ALI/ALF, serum IgG, and autoantibodies seem more helpful than liver biopsy; long-term follow-up is needed in these patients.

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis: A minireview

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a specific phenotype of drug-induced liver injury that may lead to the devastating outcome of acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation. Drugs implicated in DIAIH include antimicrobials such as nitrofurantoin and minocycline, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins as well as anti-tumor necrosis agents. The clinical features of drug-induced liver injury are indistinguishable from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as both may have positive AIH-related autoantibodies, elevated immunoglobulin G, as well as similar histopathological findings. In patients who show no clinical improvement, or there is progressive liver injury despite cessation of the suspected drug, a liver biopsy should be considered, whereby the presence of advance fibrosis on histology favors the diagnosis of idiopathic AIH. Empirical treatment with corticosteroids may be required in patients with non-resolving liver injury. A typical clinical scenario supportive of DIAIH includes a history of drug exposure with spontaneous resolution of liver injury after drug withdrawal and the absence of relapse after rapid steroid taper. In this article we report two cases of DIAIH secondary to Sorafenib and Atorvastatin along with a review of currently available literature. Early identification and treatment often lead to a favorable outcome in DIAIH.

Marked Increase of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase as an Indicator of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients without Conventional Diagnostic Criteria of Acute Liver Injury

INTRODUCTION

Clinically significant drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is defined by elevations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥2 × ULN, or ALT ≥3 × ULN and total bilirubin TBIL >2 × ULN. However, DILI might also occur in patients who do not reach those thresholds and still may benefit from discontinuation of medication.

METHODS

Fifteen patients recruited for our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs were included. DILI diagnosis was based on RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score and expert opinion and was supported by an in vitro test using monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells.

RESULTS

Median RUCAM score was 6 (range 4-8), indicating that DILI was possible or probable in all cases. The predominant types of liver injury were mixed (60%) and cholestatic (40%). While no elevation above 2 × ULN of ALP and TBIL was observed, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) above 2 × ULN was identified in 8 of the patients. Six of the 15 patients did not achieve full remission and showed persistent elevation of GGT, which was significantly associated with peak GGT elevation above 2 × ULN (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Here we present a case series of patients with liver enzyme elevation below the conventional thresholds who developed DILI with a predominant GGT elevation leading to drug withdrawal and/or chronic elevation of liver parameters, in particular of GGT. Thus, we propose that DILI should be considered in particular in cases with marked increase of GGT even if conventional DILI threshold levels are not reached, resulting in discontinuation of the causative drug and/or close monitoring of the patients.

Corticosteroid plus glycyrrhizin therapy for chronic drug- or herb-induced liver injury achieves biochemical and histological improvements: a randomised open-label trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of chronic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) or herb-induced liver injury(HILI) is an important and unresolved challenge. There is no consensus regarding the indications for corticosteroids for chronic DILI/HILI.

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid plus glycyrrhizin for patients with chronic DILI/HILI.

METHODS

This was a randomised open-label trial. Eligible patients with causality assessment using the updated RUCAM were randomly assigned (1:1) either to the steroid treatment group (48-week stepwise dose reduction of methylprednisolone plus glycyrrhizin) or control group (glycyrrhizin alone). Liver biopsies were performed at baseline and at the end of the 48-week treatment period. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sustained biochemical response (SBR). The secondary outcomes were improvement in liver histology, time to biochemical normalisation and safety.

RESULTS

Of 80 participants, 70 (87.5%) completed the trial. The patients were predominantly female (77.5%), aged >40 years (77.5%) and had a hepatocellular injury pattern of DILI (71.2%). Compared to the control group, the treatment group showed a higher proportion of SBR (94.3% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.023), shorter biochemical normalisation time and histological improvements in both histological activity and fibrosis. The DILI and HILI subgroups, as well as the autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)-like DILI and non-AIH-like subgroups, showed comparable responses. No severe adverse events were observed during the trial.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first clinical evidence that corticosteroid plus glycyrrhizin therapy for chronic DILI with or without AIH-like features can achieve both biochemical response and histological improvements with good safety. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02651350).

Acute liver injury following methylprednisolone pulse therapy: 13 cases from a prospectively collected cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenging diagnosis requiring exclusion of other causes of liver injury, concise medical history taking to identify potential causative medication and creation of a plausible temporal relation to attribute said liver injury to a potentially hepatotoxic agent. In spite of corticosteroids being considered an effective treatment for DILI in some patients, methylprednisolone (MPS) has been associated with liver injury of varying severity.

METHODS

We analyzed data of our prospective study on potentially hepatotoxic drugs (NCT02353455), identified 13 cases of MPS-associated liver injury and performed an analysis of clinical, laboratory and histopathological characteristics. For all available liver biopsy specimens, expert histopathological analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with a variety of primarily neurologic autoimmune diseases treated with MPS developed subsequent liver injury with a median latency of 5 weeks. Liver injury was severe or required transplantation in six patients. Injury typically occurred after repeated pulsing was hepatocellular and responded swiftly to prednisolone administration. For those patients who received in house-follow up, relapse after discontinuation of immunosuppression was not observed. Histopathological features of MPS-DILI comprised both interface and periportal hepatitis with mixed inflammatory infiltrates, similar to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) features.

DISCUSSION

MPS-related liver injury can be life-threatening, occurs with considerable latency and after repeat dosing. Regular surveillance of hepatic biochemistry should therefore be routinely performed also after discharge to avoid further MPS-related liver injury during repeat application. Swift response to prednisolone but not histologic features can be helpful to discriminate MPS-DILI from AIH.

Role of Corticosteroids in Drug-Induced Liver Injury. A Systematic Review

Introduction: Apart from cessation of the implicated agent leading to drug-induced liver injury (DILI), there is no standard therapy for DILI. Corticosteroids have been used in DILI, although their efficacy is unclear. Published data showed either beneficial effects or no improvement associated with steroid therapy. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review of the role of corticosteroids in the treatment of DILI.

Methods: A search was performed in PubMed, searching for the terms: “corticosteroids” and “drug-induced liver injury”. Observation studies were included, but case reports excluded.

Results: A total of 24 papers were retrieved. Most of these were observational studies on the effects of corticosteroids in moderate/severe DILI (n = 8), reports on the corticosteroid treatment in patients with drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH) (n = 5), and effects of corticosteroids in drug-induced fulminant acute liver failure (ALF, n = 2). Furthermore, treatment of corticosteroids in patients with liver injury due to check point inhibitors (CPIs) was addressed in nine studies. In moderate/severe DILI, six out of eight studies suggested steroid treatment to be beneficial, whereas two studies showed negative results. All five observational studies on the effects of corticosteroids in DI-AIH showed good therapeutic response with rapid and long lasting effects after discontinuation of corticosteroids and without evidence of relapse. Steroid therapy was not associated with improved overall survival in patients with drug-induced fulminant ALF. CPIs-induced liver injury was found to improve spontaneously in 33–50% without corticosteroids, and the rate of patients who were treated responded to steroids in 33–100% (mean 72%).

Conclusions: The majority of studies analyzing the effects of corticosteroids in moderate/severe DILI have demonstrated beneficial effects. However, this was not the case in drug-induced fulminant ALF. Patients with DI-AIH had an excellent response to corticosteroids. The majority of those with CPIs-induced liver injury responded to corticosteroids; however, patients without treatment usually recovered spontaneously. The observational design and comparison with historical controls in these studies makes it very difficult to draw conclusions on the efficacy of corticosteroids in DILI. Therefore, there is a strong need for a randomized controlled trial to properly assess the role of corticosteroids in DILI.

Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Systematic Review

Many drugs with different mechanisms of action and indications available on the market today are capable of inducing hepatotoxicity. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been a treatment challenge nowadays as it was in the past. We searched Medline (via PubMed), CENTRAL, Science Citation Index Expanded, clinical trials registries and databases of DILI and hepatotoxicity up to 2021 for novel therapies for the management of adult patients with DILI based on the combination of three main search terms: 1) treatment, 2) novel, and 3) drug-induced liver injury. The mechanism of action of novel therapies, the potential of their benefit in clinical settings, and adverse drug reactions related to novel therapies were extracted. Cochrane Risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment approach was involved in the assessment of the certainty of the evidence for primary outcomes of included studies. One thousand three hundred seventy-two articles were identified. Twenty-eight articles were included in the final analysis. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were detected and for six the available data were sufficient for analysis. In abstract form only we found six studies which were also anaylzed. Investigated agents included: bicyclol, calmangafodipir, cytisin amidophospate, fomepizole, livina-polyherbal preparation, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MgIG), picroliv, plasma exchange, radix Paeoniae Rubra, and S-adenosylmethionine. The primary outcomes of included trials mainly included laboratory markers improvement. Based on the moderate-certainty evidence, more patients treated with MgIG experienced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization compared to placebo. Low-certainty evidence suggests that bicyclol treatment leads to a reduction of ALT levels compared to phosphatidylcholine. For the remaining eight interventions, the certainty of the evidence for primary outcomes was assessed as very low and we are very uncertain in any estimate of effect. More effort should be involved to investigate the novel treatment of DILI. Well-designed RCTs with appropriate sample sizes, comparable groups and precise, not only surrogate outcomes are urgently welcome.

A phase II study on the neo-adjuvant combination of pazopanib and radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, localized soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

A prior phase I study showed that the neo-adjuvant combination of pazopanib and radiotherapy was well tolerated, and induced promising pathological responses in soft-tissue sarcoma patients. Results of the subsequent prospective, multicenter phase II, PASART-2 trial are presented here, further investigating the efficacy and safety of this combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with high-risk, localized soft-tissue sarcoma received neo-adjuvant radiotherapy, 50 Gy in 25 fractions (PASART-2A) or with a subsequent dose de-escalation to 36 Gy in 18 fractions (PASART-2B). This was combined with 800 mg once daily pazopanib, which started one week before radiotherapy and finished simultaneously. After an interval of 4-8 weeks, surgical resection was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete responses (pCR), defined as ≤5% viable cells.

RESULTS

25 patients were registered in the study, 21 in PASART-2A and 4 in PASART-2B. After central pathology review, the combination treatment led to a pCR in 5 patients (20%). 17 patients (68%) experienced grade 3+ toxicities during neo-adjuvant treatment, of which the most common were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation, and hypertension, all asymptomatic. Grade 3+ acute post-operative toxicities occurred in 5 patients (20%), of which the most common was wound infection. All patients completed the full radiotherapy regimen and underwent surgery. Pazopanib was discontinued before completion in 9 patients (36%), due to elevated ALT and/or AST, and shortly interrupted in 2 patients (8%), due to hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Apart from asymptomatic hepatotoxicity, the study regimen was well tolerated. Although the pre-specified efficacy endpoint (30% pCR) was not met, a more than doubling of historical pCR rates after neo-adjuvant radiotherapy alone was observed, which warrants further investigation.

Use of immunosuppression in non-transplant hepatology

Human liver possesses a persistent and tightly regulated immune response. Maintaining this homeostatic state is the key to prevent pathological processes, as a failure in clearing dangerous stimuli, is associated with tissue damage. A dysregulation of the liver immune homeostasis is involved in many disease processes and the use of the immunosuppression aims to control the inflammatory response, where the physiologic mechanisms failed. The use of steroids which targets broadly the inflammatory cascade and the immune system activation have been extensively employed in both acute and chronic liver diseases. They currently are the backbone of the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis or IgG4 sclerosing cholangitis. The steroid use in acute liver injury, especially alcohol mediated and drug induced liver injury (DILI), have been debated, despite the biological rationale. The immunosuppression molecules currently employed in liver diseases target the immune system broadly, causing multiple side effects either intrinsic in the mechanisms of the drug or secondary to off-target toxicity. The future of immunosuppressant treatment is moving towards more selective strategies, targeting disease specific pathways. This review aims to explore the rationale of use of immunosuppression in non-transplant hepatology. A broad summary of the immune biology of liver immune mediated diseases will be provided to the readers in order to highlight the potential therapeutic targets. An extensive description of the molecules employed in liver diseases will follow and the clinical evidences in AIH, IgG4 related cholangitis, alcoholic hepatitis and DILI will be reviewed.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is common in gastroenterology and hepatology practices, and it can have multiple presentations, ranging from asymptomatic elevations in liver biochemistries to hepatocellular or cholestatic jaundice, liver failure, or chronic hepatitis. Antimicrobials, herbal and dietary supplements, and anticancer therapeutics (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune-checkpoint inhibitors) are the most common classes of agents to cause DILI in the Western world. DILI is a diagnosis of exclusion, and thus, careful assessment for other etiologies of liver disease should be undertaken before establishing a diagnosis of DILI. Model for end-stage liver disease score and comorbidity burden are important determinants of mortality in patients presenting with suspected DILI. DILI carries a mortality rate up to 10% when hepatocellular jaundice is present. Patients with DILI who develop progressive jaundice with or without coagulopathy should be referred to a tertiary care center for specialized care, including consideration for potential liver transplantation. The role of systemic corticosteroids is controversial, but they may be administered when a liver injury event cannot be distinguished between autoimmune hepatitis or DILI or when a DILI event presents with prominent autoimmune hepatitis features.

Immune-Mediated Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Immunogenetics and Experimental Models

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenging clinical event in medicine, particularly because of its ability to present with a variety of phenotypes including that of autoimmune hepatitis or other immune mediated liver injuries. Limited diagnostic and therapeutic tools are available, mostly because its pathogenesis has remained poorly understood for decades. The recent scientific and technological advancements in genomics and immunology are paving the way for a better understanding of the molecular aspects of DILI. This review provides an updated overview of the genetic predisposition and immunological mechanisms behind the pathogenesis of DILI and presents the state-of-the-art experimental models to study DILI at the pre-clinical level.

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Mechanistic and Clinical Challenges

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) remains a significant problem for patients and drug development. The idiosyncratic nature of IDILI makes mechanistic studies difficult, and little is known of its pathogenesis for certain. Circumstantial evidence suggests that most, but not all, IDILI is caused by reactive metabolites of drugs that are bioactivated by cytochromes P450 and other enzymes in the liver. Additionally, there is overwhelming evidence that most IDILI is mediated by the adaptive immune system; one example being the association of IDILI caused by specific drugs with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, and this may in part explain the idiosyncratic nature of these reactions. The T cell receptor repertoire likely also contributes to the idiosyncratic nature. Although most of the liver injury is likely mediated by the adaptive immune system, specifically cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, adaptive immune activation first requires an innate immune response to activate antigen presenting cells and produce cytokines required for T cell proliferation. This innate response is likely caused by either a reactive metabolite or some form of cell stress that is clinically silent but not idiosyncratic. If this is true it would make it possible to study the early steps in the immune response that in some patients can lead to IDILI. Other hypotheses have been proposed, such as mitochondrial injury, inhibition of the bile salt export pump, unfolded protein response, and oxidative stress although, in most cases, it is likely that they are also involved in the initiation of an immune response rather than representing a completely separate mechanism. Using the clinical manifestations of liver injury from a number of examples of IDILI-associated drugs, this review aims to summarize and illustrate these mechanistic hypotheses.

Autoimmune hepatitis: from immunopathogenesis to diagnostic and therapeutic innovation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To understand the pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment options that have improved lately. We summarize the latest research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Concerning pathogenesis of AIH, different groups have identified pieces of the puzzle that fit together well: An altered microbiome in the gut results in a proinflammatory response in the liver. This response is built by type II natural killer cells and CD4 T cells with an inflammatory phenotype and marked tumor necrosis factor production. When looking specifically at autoantigenic CD4 T cells, these have a B-helper phenotype on transcriptomic analysis. This explains not only elevation of immunoglobulins in AIH, but also mechanistically the effect of anti-B-cell substances in treatment. Diagnosis is now facilitated by an improved diagnostic score for AIH also recognizing modern techniques for autoantibody detection. Treatment in the future will increasingly be focused on reducing dosage and duration of steroid exposition. In addition, B-cell-targeted treatments have been evaluated with considerable success.

SUMMARY

Research in the past 18 months has improved the understanding of pathogenesis and thereby opened a number of possible treatment options. In addition, steroid use is cautioned by the recent findings.

Recent updates on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immunoinflammatory chronic liver disease with dynamic and rather heterogeneous disease manifestations. A trend of increasing prevalence of AIH has been observed worldwide, along with a relative increase in the percentage of male patients. AIH is characterized and diagnosed based on serum biochemistry and liver histology: elevated aminotransferases and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), the presence of serum anti-nuclear antibody or anti-smooth muscle antibody, and interface lympho-plasmacytic hepatitis. Clinical manifestations differ among disease subtypes with distinct time-frames, i.e., AIH with a chronic insidious onset, and acute-onset AIH (the diagnosis of which is often challenging due to the lack of typical serum findings). The absence of disease-specific biomarkers or histological findings may expand the disease phenotype into drug-induced AIH-like liver injury. Corticosteroids and azathioprine are recommended first-line treatments for AIH. The complete normalization of aminotransferases and serum IgG is an essential treatment response to ensure long-term overall survival. An incomplete response or intolerance to these drugs is considered an indication for second-line treatment, especially with mycophenolate mofetil. Life-long maintenance treatment is required for the majority of patients, but the few who achieve prolonged and stringent biochemical remission with lower alanine aminotransferase and IgG within the normal range may be able to discontinue the medications. In the future, the quality of life of AIH patients should be managed by personalized medicine, including the appropriate selection and dosing of first-line therapy and perhaps alternating with potential therapeutics, and the prediction of the success of treatment withdrawal.

Acute liver injury in a patient with adult-onset Still's disease-the challenge of differential diagnosis

In addition to the cardinal symptoms of fever, rash and arthralgia, liver involvement in patients with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) has been described. However, acute liver injury in AOSD patients can have various other causes: it can be a result of an AOSD-induced macrophage activation syndrome or be associated to the drugs given for the underlying diseases and symptoms. Differential diagnosis can therefore be challenging. We here present a case of a 32-year-old male with acute liver injury following the initial diagnosis of AOSD to discuss the possible underlying reasons.

A Case of Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome after Drug-Induced Liver Injury Caused by Pelubiprofen

Vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) is a rare disease characterized by ductopenia and cholestasis, and is linked to immunological damage to the bile duct system. VBDS can be triggered by infection, ischemia, autoimmune diseases, adverse drug reactions, and humoral factors associated with malignancy. A few cases of VBDS associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related drug-induced liver injury (DILI) have been reported. Here, we report a case of a 29-year-old patient who developed DILI that progressed to VBDS after the administration of pelubiprofen.

Worldwide Use of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 81,856 Idiosyncratic DILI and 14,029 HILI Cases Published 1993-Mid 2020: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: A large number of idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (iDILI) and herb induced liver injury(HILI) cases of variable quality has been published but some are a matter of concern if the cases were not evaluated for causality using a robust causality assessment method (CAM) such as RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) as diagnostiinjuryc algorithm. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the worldwide use of RUCAM in iDILI and HILI cases. Methods: The PubMed database (1993-30 June 2020) was searched for articles by using the following key terms: Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method; RUCAM; Idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury; iDILI; Herb induced liver injury; HILI. Results: Considering reports published worldwide since 1993, our analysis showed the use of RUCAM for causality assessment in 95,885 cases of liver injury including 81,856 cases of idiosyncratic DILI and 14,029 cases of HILI. Among the top countries providing RUCAM based DILI cases were, in decreasing order, China, the US, Germany, Korea, and Italy, with China, Korea, Germany, India, and the US as the top countries for HILI. Conclusion: Since 1993 RUCAM is certainly the most widely used method to assess causality in IDILI and HILI. This should encourage practitioner, experts, and regulatory agencies to use it in order to reinforce their diagnosis and to take sound decisions.