Rates of decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in AMA-negative primary biliary cholangitis cirrhosis

Hepatitis delta testing trends in a US national cohort: An analysis of patient and provider-level predictive factors

BACKGROUND

The low prevalence of HDV infection in the United States could be attributed to insufficient testing rate, which can result in an underestimation of the true burden of HDV. The primary objective of this study is to quantify the prevalence of and factors associated with HDV antibody (anti-HDV) or RNA testing, among participants with positive HBsAg in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of participants who tested positive for HBsAg between January 2000 and December 2022 within the VHA. We identified those who were tested for HDV, and patient and provider-level factors associated with HDV testing.

RESULTS

Of 41,658 participants with positive HBsAg who had follow-up, 4438 (10.7%) were tested at least once for HDV, of which 135 (3.0%) were positive. Participants in the Northeast (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17-1.44, p<0.001), and receiving hepatology care (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.24-1.54, p<0.001) were more likely, while those in the Midwest (aOR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79, p<0.001), under the care of a primary care provider (aOR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.50-0.74, p<0.001), Blacks (aOR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.94, p=0.001), participants who were HCV antibody-positive (aOR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99, p=0.03), and participants who were HIV-positive (aOR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.90, p<0.001) were less likely to be tested for HDV.

CONCLUSIONS

HDV screening rates in the VHA remain low overall. Participants who are Black, living in the Midwest, patients who are HIV-positive, and patients who are HCV-positive are less likely to be tested for HDV. These results suggest that risk-based screening strategies are ineffective in the VHA and highlight the need for refining testing strategies to increase HDV screening rates.

Liver Stiffness Measurement and Risk Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After HCV Eradication in Veterans With Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) despite a sustained virological response (SVR). We examined whether post-SVR liver stiffness measurement (LSM) could be used to stratify HCC risk.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 1850 participants identified from the Veterans Health Administration, with HCV cirrhosis and SVR, followed up over 5099 person-years, from the time of post-SVR elastography until death, HCC, or the end of the study.

RESULTS

The risk of HCC increased by 3% with every 1-kPa increase in LSM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.04; P < .001) and decreased with the number of years from SVR (aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90; P = .0003). The adjusted annual risk of HCC was 2.03% among participants with post-SVR LSM <10 kPa, 2.48% in LSM 10-14.9 kPa (aHR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.01-2.88; P = .046), 3.22% for LSM 15-19.9 kPa (aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.78-3.20; P = .20), 5.07% among LSM 20-24.9 kPa (aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.30-5.01; P = .01), and 5.44% in LSM ≥25 kPa (aHR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.74-5.26; P < .0001). The adjusted annual risk of HCC was < 0.4% in participants with LSM <5 kPa and without diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

LSM predicts rates of HCC in patients with HCV cirrhosis after SVR at multiple cutoff levels and offers a single test to predict portal hypertension-related complications and HCC. Patients with LSM <5 kPa in the absence of diabetes mellitus had a low risk of HCC in which surveillance could be discontinued.

Diagnostic value of anti-mitochondrial antibody in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) and the M2 subtype are considered serological hallmarks in the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, these autoantibodies may be undetectable in some patients. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum AMA and M2 for PBC.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a random-effects model. We also constructed hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves and calculated the area under the curve values.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 28 studies, of which 24 examined the diagnostic accuracy of AMA for PBC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of AMA were 84% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 77-90%) and 98% (96-99%), respectively. Pooled LR+, LR-, and DOR were 42.2 (22.1-80.5), 0.16 (0.11-0.24), and 262 (114-601), respectively. Sixteen studies explored the diagnostic value of the M2 subtype, demonstrating pooled sensitivity and specificity of 89% (81-94%) and 96% (93-98%), respectively. Pooled LR+, LR-, and DOR were 20.3 (8.0-51.1), 0.12 (0.05-0.26), and 169 (41-706), respectively. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves for both of serum AMA and M2 subtype lie closer to the upper left corner of the plot with area under the curve values of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99) respectively.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides evidence affirming the utility of AMA and M2 as sensitive and specific serological hallmarks that can facilitate early screening and diagnosis of PBC.

Primary biliary cholangitis: Epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic autoimmune liver disease characterized by a destructive, small duct, and lymphocytic cholangitis, and marked by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies. The incidence and prevalence of PBC vary widely in different regions and time periods, and although disproportionally more common among White non-Hispanic females, contemporary data show a higher prevalence in males and racial minorities than previously described. Outcomes largely depend on early recognition of the disease and prompt institution of treatment, which, in turn, are directly influenced by provider bias and socioeconomic factors. Ursodeoxycholic acid remains the initial treatment of choice for PBC, with obeticholic acid and fibrates (off-label therapy) reserved as add-on therapy for the management of inadequate responders or those with ursodeoxycholic acid intolerance. Novel and repurposed drugs are currently at different stages of clinical development not only for the treatment of PBC but also for its symptomatic management. Here, we summarize the most up-to-date data regarding the epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment of PBC, providing clinically useful information for its holistic management.

Incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis: criteria, epidemiology, and possible mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

As a common autoimmune disease with the characteristic of early complication, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) leads to an increasing number of mortalities among people with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) waiting for liver transplantation. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only approved first-line medicine for PBC, and a good response to treatment could acquire an ideal prognosis. Patients with poor UDCA response usually have more adverse outcomes and worse survival, therefore, the management of this group become a major consideration.

AREAS COVERED

Due to the complexity of race and environment for PBC, different criteria for UDCA response exhibit various predictive performances. Factors affecting UDCA response conditions include gender, age, ethnicity, serum indicators, auto-antibodies, and autoimmune comorbidities, while no agreement has been reached. In this review, we mainly focus on cellular senescence, immune-mediated damage, and vitamin D deficiency as possible mechanisms for UDCA non-responders.

EXPERT OPINION

The pathogenesis of PBC has yet to be clarified. Immunology-related mechanisms and therapy targets ought to be the main effort made for further study. Irrespective of the response condition, UDCA is recommended for routine administration in all PBC patients without contraindication. Ongoing clinical trials of second-line and additional therapy exhibit promising prospects.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis in Males: Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, and Prognosis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an immune-mediated chronic liver disease characterized by progressive cholestasis, bile duct destruction, biliary fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Patients who respond to ursodeoxycholic acid have an expected survival similar to the general population. Although PBC primarily affects females, the prevalence in males is higher than was previously believed, with contemporary studies suggesting a female-to-male ratio of 4-6:1. A diagnosis of PBC is often delayed among males because of the myth that PBC is rare in males.

Contemporary Epidemiology of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a cholestatic liver disease with potential evolution to liver cirrhosis when left untreated. Despite being rare, PBC has a substantial impact on the quality of life and survival of affected patients. Women are the most diagnosed worldwide; however, male subjects seem to have more aggressive disease and worse prognosis. Changing epidemiologic trends are emerging in PBC, with increasing global prevalence and slight smoothing of sex differences. In this review we present available data on incidence rates and prevalence of PBC worldwide, highlighting geographic differences and factors impacting clinical outcomes.

Update on the Evaluation and Management of Portal Hypertension

The development of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with chronic liver disease is an important predictor of varices, variceal hemorrhage, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and death. The nomenclature of compensated advanced chronic liver disease, revised from compensated cirrhosis, recognizes the importance of portal hypertension (PH), rather than the histologic finding of cirrhosis, in clinical outcomes. Recent advances in the field have focused on the development of noninvasive methods, including transient elastography (TE), magnetic resonance elastography, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, for predicting PH. TE is evolving to be the most widespread clinical tool to estimate PH, with a liver stiffness (LS) measurement cutoff of greater than or equal to 25 kilopascals (kPa) ruling in CSPH, and that of less than 15 kPa combined with a platelet count of greater than 150 × 10⁹/L ruling out CSPH. Extending utilization of TE to not only LS measurement but also splenic stiffness measurement using the same probes may augment the sensitivity of detecting CSPH and thus selecting candidates warranting endoscopic evaluation for high-risk varices. With respect to management of PH, the role of nonselective β blockers continues to evolve and may extend beyond variceal bleed in preventing decompensation and development of ascites. Statins have a burgeoning well of data supporting their use, but large, prospective, controlled trials with clinical endpoints are awaited. Further data are still warranted regarding the use of long-term albumin therapy to prevent complications of PH.