Carvedilol as the new non-selective beta-blocker of choice in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Development and validation of a radiomics-based prediction model for variceal bleeding in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome-related gastroesophageal varices

BACKGROUND

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is caused by obstruction of the hepatic veins or suprahepatic inferior vena cava, leading to portal hypertension and the development of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs), which are associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Existing risk models for variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients have limited applicability to BCS due to differences in pathophysiology. Radiomics, as a noninvasive technique, holds promise as a tool for more accurate prediction of bleeding risk in BCS-related GEVs.

AIM

To develop and validate a personalized risk model for predicting variceal bleeding in BCS patients with GEVs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 444 BCS patients with GEVs in two centers. Radiomic features were extracted from portal venous phase computed tomography (CT) scans. A training cohort of 334 patients was used to develop the model, with 110 patients serving as an external validation cohort. LASSO Cox regression was used to select radiomic features for constructing a radiomics score (Radscore). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression identified independent clinical predictors. A combined radiomics + clinical (R + C) model was developed using stepwise regression. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with external validation to evaluate generalizability.

RESULTS

The Radscore comprised four hepatic and six splenic CT features, which predicted the risk of variceal bleeding. Multivariate analysis identified invasive treatment to relieve hepatic venous outflow obstruction, anticoagulant therapy, and hemoglobin levels as independent clinical predictors. The R + C model achieved C-indices of 0.906 (training) and 0.859 (validation), outperforming the radiomics and clinical models alone (AUC: training 0.936 vs 0.845 vs 0.823; validation 0.876 vs 0.712 vs 0.713). DCA showed higher clinical net benefit across the thresholds. The model stratified patients into low-, medium- and high-risk groups with significant differences in bleeding rates (P < 0.001). An online tool is available at https://bcsvh.shinyapps.io/BCS_Variceal_Bleeding_Risk_Tool/.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a novel radiomics-based model that noninvasively and conveniently predicted risk of variceal bleeding in BCS patients with GEVs, aiding early identification and management of high-risk patients.

Comparison of Carvedilol to Propranolol in Reduction of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient in Liver Cirrhosis: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Nonselective beta-blockers, such as propranolol and carvedilol, are used to prevent first decompensation in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search of English language articles from inception in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases to compare the effect of carvedilol and propranolol on systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics. Mean differences were pooled using a random-effect model, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with a total of 351 patients were involved in the final analysis. Reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly greater in the carvedilol group (MD = -0.76, 95% CI = -1.45 to -0.08; p = 0.03). Decrease in systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure was significantly greater in the carvedilol group ([MD = -190.55, 95% CI = -307.5 to -73.58; p = 0.001] and [MD = -3.65, 95% CI = -5.94 to -1.36; p = 0.002], respectively). Decrease in cardiac output was greater in the propranolol group (MD = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.45-1.38; p = 0.004). Decrease in hepatic blood flow and right atrial pressure appeared to be greater in the propranolol group; however, this did not reach statistical significance ([MD = 0.13, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.32; p = 0.17] and [MD = 0.28, 95% CI = -0.27 to 0.83; p = 0.32], respectively). Decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure appeared to be greater in the carvedilol group; however, this was not statistically significant (MD = -0.75, 95% CI = -1.60 to 0.10; p = 0.08). There was no difference in incidence of rebleeding, shortness of breath, hepatic encephalopathy, and hypotension between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in HVPG, SVR, and MAP compared to propranolol, with no significant difference in adverse effects.

The burden of ascites in cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Liver cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with complications such as ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) significantly worsening prognosis. This paper aims to review the pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies for ascites and the complication of it, emphasizing the role of portal hypertension.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, ascites formation, and related complications. Existing evidence was evaluated and ranked using the GRADE system: A (high) to D (verly low). Recommendation strength was graded 1 (strong) or 2 (weak).

RESULTS

Portal hypertension is the key factor in ascites development. Non-invasive tools such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) have proven to be effective in identifying patients at risk for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), thus guiding treatment decisions. Carvedilol, recommended over propranolol, offers superior efficacy in reducing portal pressure. Diuretics, in combination with a moderate sodium-restricted diet, are the first-line treatment for ascites. However, refractory ascites requires advanced interventions. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) remains a major complication in patients with ascites, while hepatorenal syndrome - acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) demands early recognition and timely vasoconstrictor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver cirrhosis and the complication of it significantly impact patient quality of life and survival. Portal hypertension is a critical driver of ascites and other complications, making early identification through non-invasive diagnostic methods essential for appropriate management. Medical treatments, including non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), diuretics, and advanced procedures, offer substantial benefits in controlling ascites and preventing further decompensation.

Mechanical mechanics-reclaiming a new battlefield for chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

In the 21st century, significant breakthroughs have been made in the research of chronic liver disease. New biochemical markers of pathogenicity and corresponding drugs continue to emerge. However, current treatment strategies remain unsatisfactory due to complex pathological changes in the liver, including vascular dysfunction, myofibroblast-like transition, and local tissue necrosis in liver sinusoids. These challenges have created an urgent need for innovative, synergistic treatments. Mechanical mechanics is a growing field, with increasing evidence suggesting that mechanical signals play a role similar to that of biochemical markers. These signals influence response speed, conduction intensity, and functional diversity in regulating cell activities.

AIM OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the three main mechanical characteristics involved in the progression of "liver fibrosis-cirrhosis-hepatocellular carcinoma" and provides an in-depth interpretation of several mechanically-related targets. Finally, current and cutting-edge therapeutic strategies are proposed from a cellular perspective. Despite the many challenges that remain, this review is both relevant and significant.

Beta-Blockers Lower First Decompensation in Patients With Cirrhosis and Enduring Portal Hypertension After Etiological Treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) can lower the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (identified by a hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg) with active etiology. Our aim was to examine the effect of NSBBs on first decompensation occurrence in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment.

METHODS

Patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinical evidence of CSPH (gastroesophageal varices [GEVs] and/or spontaneous portosystemic collaterals [SPSSs]) after 2 years from etiological treatment. The primary endpoint was first decompensation (occurrence of variceal bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy) in patients on NSBBs vs off NSBBs.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 406 patients. Baseline characteristics of patients on NSBBs (n = 187) and off NSBBs (n = 219) were comparable, except for signs of portal hypertension that were more pronounced in the on-NSBBs group. During a mean follow-up of 32 months, 127 (31%) patients decompensated, with ascites being the most common (77%) decompensating event. Decompensation rates were lower in patients on NSBBs (16% vs 44%; P < .0001). The benefit of NSBBs on decompensation was maintained in patients with small GEVs (17% vs 43%; P < .0001), in those with spontaneous portosystemic shunt only (8% vs 43%; P = .003), and in each different etiology, including hepatitis C virus-cured cirrhosis (9% vs 32%; P < .0001). At Cox regression analysis, hemoglobin, Child-Pugh, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium, diabetes at baseline, and previous bacterial infections were independent predictors of decompensation, while NSBBs use had a protective effect (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.49; P < .0001). NSBBs use significantly reduced bacterial infection rates (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.58; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

NSBBs decrease the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment.

Visualizing global progress and challenges in esophagogastric variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding is a catastrophic complication of portal hypertension, most commonly caused by cirrhosis of various etiologies. Although a considerable body of research has been conducted in this area, the complexity of the disease and the lack of standardized treatment strategies have led to fragmented findings, insufficient information, and a lack of systematic investigation. Bibliometric analysis can help clarify research trends, identify core topics, and reveal potential future directions. Therefore, this study aims to use bibliometric methods to conduct an in-depth exploration of research progress in this field, with the expectation of providing new insights for both clinical practice and scientific research.

AIM

To evaluate research trends and advancements in esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) over the past twenty years.

METHODS

Relevant publications on EGVB were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer, Pajek, CiteSpace, and the bibliometrix package were then employed to perform bibliometric visualizations of publication volume, countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and citation counts.

RESULTS

The analysis focused on original research articles and review papers. From 2004 to 2023, a total of 2097 records on EGVB were retrieved. The number of relevant publications has increased significantly over the past two decades, especially in China and the United States. The leading contributors in this field, in terms of countries, institutions, authors, and journals, were China, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bosch Jaime, and World Journal of Gastroenterology, respectively. Core keywords in this field include portal hypertension, management, liver cirrhosis, risk, prevention, and diagnosis. Future research directions may focus on optimizing diagnostic methods, personalized treatment, and multidisciplinary collaboration.

CONCLUSION

Using bibliometric methods, this study reveals the developmental trajectory and trends in research on EGVB, underscoring risk assessment and diagnostic optimization as the core areas of current focus. The study provides an innovative and systematic perspective for this field, indicating that future research could center on multidisciplinary collaboration, personalized treatment approaches, and the development of new diagnostic tools. Moreover, this work offers practical research directions for both the academic community and clinical practice, driving continued advancement in this domain.

Preventing the progression of cirrhosis to decompensation and death

Two main stages are differentiated in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD), one compensated (cACLD) with an excellent prognosis, and the other decompensated (dACLD), defined by the appearance of complications (ascites, variceal bleeding and hepatic encephalopathy) and associated with high mortality. Preventing the progression to dACLD might dramatically improve prognosis and reduce the burden of care associated with ACLD. Portal hypertension is a major driver of the transition from cACLD to dACLD, and a portal pressure of ≥10 mmHg defines clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) as the threshold from which decompensating events may occur. In recent years, innovative studies have provided evidence supporting new strategies to prevent decompensation in cACLD. These studies have yielded major advances, including the development of noninvasive tests (NITs) to identify patients with CSPH with reasonable confidence, the demonstration that aetiological therapies can prevent disease progression and even achieve regression of cirrhosis, and the finding that non-selective β-blockers can effectively prevent decompensation in patients with cACLD and CSPH, mainly by reducing the risk of ascites, the most frequent decompensating event. Here, we review the evidence supporting new strategies to manage cACLD to prevent decompensation and the caveats for their implementation, from patient selection using NITs to ancillary therapies.

Pharmacological Treatment of Ascites: Challenges and Controversies

Ascites is the most common complication from cirrhosis related to portal hypertension and depicts the onset of hepatic decompensation. Ranging from uncomplicated to refractory ascites, the progression carries prognostic value by reflecting the deterioration of underlying cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Diuretics have been the mainstay of treatment to control ascites, but the side effects heighten when the dosage is escalated. Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) are widely used nowadays to prevent hepatic decompensation and variceal hemorrhage. However, with worsening systemic vasodilation and inflammation when ascites progresses, patients on NSBBs are at risk of hemodynamic collapse leading to renal hypoperfusion and thus hepatorenal syndrome. Long-term albumin infusion was studied to prevent the progression of ascites. However, the results were conflicting. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are under investigation to control refractory ascites. With that, patients with refractory ascites may require regular large-volume paracentesis. With an aging population, more patients are put on anti-thrombotic agents and their risks in decompensated cirrhosis and invasive procedures have to be considered. In general, decompensated cirrhosis with ascites poses multiple issues to pharmacological treatment. In the present review, we discuss the challenges and controversies in the pharmacological treatment of ascites.

Measured glomerular filtration rate predicts liver related deaths better than estimated glomerular filtration rate in advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Renal dysfunction is prevalent in advanced chronic liver disease (aCLD) and is associated to liver-related death (LRD). This makes a reliable evaluation of renal function (RF) a crucial aspect. RF can be estimated by formulas or measured by gold standard method. Estimated RF is not reliable in aCLD. However, there is a lack of information on the reliability of formulas in the prediction of LRD.

METHODS

We analysed a cohort of patients with aCLD in whom RF was measured by the plasma clearance of iohexol (mGFR) and estimated (eGFR) by formulas: MDRD, CKD-EPI, Royal Free Hospital (RFHC), GRAIL and Mindikoglu-eGFR. LRD was defined as death from hepatic causes. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate association of mGFR or eGFR with LRD.

RESULTS

161 patients were evaluated, with median follow-up of 28 months, 58 died from LRD. In overall group mGFR (OR 0.99; p = 0.022) and formulas: CKD-EPI (OR 0.98; p = 0.044), GRAIL (OR 0.98; p = 0.038) was associated with LRD. In patients with normal creatinine levels (≤ 1.1 mg/dL), mGFR (OR 0.99; p = 0.031) was whereas any formula was not associated with LRD.

CONCLUSIONS

eGFR appears as an unreliable method for predicting LRDs in aCLD, especially in those with lower creatinine levels. By contrast, mGFR seems to be a superior predictor.

Advances in intrahepatic and extrahepatic vascular dysregulations in cirrhotic portal hypertension

Cirrhotic portal hypertension, the most prevalent and clinically significant complication of liver cirrhosis, manifests as elevated portal venous pressure and is associated with severe complications. Although much research on the mechanisms of portal hypertension has focused on liver fibrosis, less attention has been given to the role of intrahepatic and extrahepatic vascular dysfunction, particularly with respect to extrahepatic vasculature. While the role of hepatic fibrosis in cirrhotic portal hypertension is undeniable, the underlying mechanisms involving intrahepatic and extrahepatic vasculature are highly complex. Sinusoidal capillarization and endothelial dysfunction contribute to increased intrahepatic vascular resistance. Hemodynamic changes in the extrahepatic circulation, including splanchnic vasodilation and hyperdynamic circulation, play a significant role in the development of portal hypertension. Additionally, therapeutic strategies targeting these vascular mechanisms are diverse, including improvement of sinusoidal microcirculation, therapies targeting hepatic stellate cells activation, and pharmacological modulation of systemic vascular tone. Therefore, in this review, we will discuss the vascular-related mechanisms and treatment progress of portal hypertension in cirrhosis to provide a new theoretical basis and practical guidance for clinical treatment.

From Pathophysiology to Practice: Evolving Pharmacological Therapies, Clinical Complications, and Pharmacogenetic Considerations in Portal Hypertension

Background: Portal hypertension is a major complication of chronic liver diseases, leading to serious issues such as esophageal variceal bleeding. The increase in portal vein pressure is driven by both an organic component and a functional component, including tonic contraction of hepatic stellate cells. These processes result in a pathological rise in intrahepatic vascular resistance, stemming from partial impairment of hepatic microcirculation, which is further exacerbated by abnormalities in extrahepatic vessels, including increased portal blood flow. Objectives: This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving pharmacological therapies for portal hypertension, with consideration and discussion of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical complications, and pharmacogenetic considerations, highlighting potential directions for future research. Methods: A review of recent literature was performed to evaluate current knowledge and potential therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. Results: For over 35 years, non-selective beta-blockers have been the cornerstone therapy for portal hypertension by reducing portal vein inflow as an extrahepatic target, effectively preventing decompensation and variceal hemorrhages. However, since not all patients exhibit an adequate response to non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), and some may not tolerate NSBBs, alternative or adjunctive therapies that enhance the effects of NSBBs on portal pressure are being investigated in preclinical and early clinical studies. Conclusions: A better understanding of pharmacogenetic factors and pathophysiological mechanisms could lead to more individualized and effective treatments for portal hypertension. These insights highlight potential directions for future research.

Comparative efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation versus non-selective beta-blockers in primary prevention of gastroesophageal varix type 2: an IPTW-adjusted study

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines recommend non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for primary prevention in cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices. However, there is no clear recommendation for primary prevention strategies for gastric varices, particularly GOV-2. Our objective is to investigate the incidence of initial bleeding and liver-related complications when NSBB and EVL are used for primary prevention in GOV-2.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients with GOV-2 gastric varices. Patients were divided into the NSBB group or the EVL group. Differences in the incidence of initial bleeding within 1 year, as well as the occurrence of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy and ascites, were compared between the two groups before and after adjustment for Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent risk factors for the first bleeding event.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients in the NSBB group and 66 patients in the EVL group. Before IPTW adjustment, there were differences between the two groups in sex, portal hypertensive gastropathy, esophageal variceal diameter, red signs, FIB-4, and MELD scores. After IPTW adjustment, these differences were balanced, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) within acceptable ranges. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference in bleeding rates between the two groups before or after IPTW adjustment. After IPTW adjustment, Cox regression analysis identified esophageal variceal diameter (HR:5.59 (2.03-15.39), p < 0.001) and MELD score (HR:1.17 (1.01-1.23), p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for bleeding. NSBB treatment did not reduce the incidence of liver-related complications within one year compared to EVL.

CONCLUSION

For primary prevention of bleeding in cirrhotic patients with GOV-2, EVL does not significantly reduce initial bleeding episodes or liver-related complications compared to NSBB.

Cirrhosis in primary practice: many patients remain potentially undiagnosed and are not receiving liver cancer surveillance

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Most patients with cirrhosis have compensated disease and are cared for in primary care; however, the exact epidemiology within Australia remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess cirrhosis care in an Australian primary care setting by evaluating rates of cirrhosis diagnosis, appropriate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and specialist communication.

METHODS

Electronic medical records in consenting general practices were reviewed using the "Liver Toolkit" to identify patients with an existing cirrhosis diagnosis. Individual cases were reviewed to identify outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one patients with confirmed cirrhosis across nine general practices were identified (74% male, mean age: 61.2 years). There was significant variation in the rate of cirrhosis diagnosis between practices (range 31.7-637.9 per 100 000 patients, P < 0.0001). Patients with cirrhosis had predominately compensated disease (75% Child-Pugh A) and common etiologies of cirrhosis were alcohol (49%), hepatitis C (47%), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (29%). Forty-two patients (25%) had received appropriate HCC surveillance. Predictors of inadequate HCC surveillance were time from last specialist correspondence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06 per month increase, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.10, P = 0.002) and hepatitis B (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.06-0.98, P = 0.047). Specialist correspondence with primary care was older than 2 years or absent in 37% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a 20-fold difference in the rate of cirrhosis diagnosis between general practices within Sydney, suggesting a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed. Three quarters of patients with diagnosed cirrhosis are not receiving appropriate HCC surveillance.

Outpatient management after hospitalisation for acute decompensation of cirrhosis: A practical guide

Acute decompensation in cirrhotic patients signifies the onset of clinically evident events due to portal hypertension. The transition from compensated to decompensated cirrhosis involves hemodynamic changes leading to multiorgan dysfunction, managed predominantly in outpatient settings with regular monitoring. The mortality risk is elevated in decompensated patients. Therefore, diligent outpatient management should focus on regular medical follow-ups, medication adjustments, patient education, addressing emergent issues and evaluation for liver transplantation. The ultimate goal is to improve quality of life, prevent disease progression, reduce complications, and assess possible recompensation. This guide provides valuable recommendations for medical experts managing decompensated cirrhotic patients post-hospitalization.

Comparison of Carvedilol and Propranolol in Reducing the Portal Vein Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The portal vein pressure higher than 10 mm Hg in patients with hepatic cirrhosis is more likely to have serious complications and poor prognosis. Nonselective receptor blockers (NSBBs) can reduce the portal vein pressure; however, the efficacy and safety of different NSBBs in reducing portal vein pressure were unconsistent. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carvedilol versus propranolol in reducing portal vein pressure in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and Cochrane library up to January 2024. Data from eligible studies were pooled in fixed-effect or random-effect meta-analysis models, using RevMan software. Two researchers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality independently according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes were the reduction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), the hemodynamic response rate, and the incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes were mean artery pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR).

RESULTS

A total of 7 RCTs, including 351 patients, were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that the magnitude of reduction in HVPG was greater in carvedilol compared with propranolol (MD: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.54; I2=0%, P<0.00001) in short-term follow-up. Carvedilol's hemodynamic response rate was higher than that of propranolol (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.72; I2=0%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that compared with propranolol, carvedilol was better in lowering portal hypertensive and had higher response rate in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. There was no obvious difference in safety between the 2 medications.

Parastomal Varices as an Atypical Source of Bleeding From a Urostomy in a Patient With Alcoholic Liver Disease

Parastomal varices are an uncommon but significant source of hemorrhage in patients with portal hypertension, often posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We report the case of a 73-year-old male with a history of alcoholic liver disease and a urostomy following cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. The patient presented with profuse bleeding from his urostomy site. Imaging revealed dilated vessels within the ileal conduit and associated mesentery and peri esophageal varices, suggesting possible underlying portal hypertension. This case highlights the importance of considering parastomal varices in patients with stomas and liver disease who present with bleeding.

Hepatic artery diameter predicts bleeding risk after gastroesophageal varices treatment: a contrast-enhanced CT study

OBJECTIVE

Portal hypertension leads to hepatic artery dilatation and a higher risk of bleeding. We tried to identify the bleeding risk after gastroesophageal varices (GOV) treatment using hepatic artery diameter of contrast-enhanced CT.

METHODS

Retrospective retrieval of 258 patients with cirrhosis who underwent contrast-enhanced CT from January 2022 to May 2023 and endoscopy within one month thereafter at Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University. Cirrhotic patients before GOV treatment were used as the test cohort (n = 199), and cirrhotic patients after GOV treatment were used as the validation cohort (n = 59). The grading and bleeding risk was classified according to the endoscopic findings. Arterial-phase images of contrast-enhanced CT were used for coronal reconstruction, and the midpoint diameter of the hepatic artery was measured on coronal images. The optimal cutoff value for identifying bleeding risk was analyzed and calculated in the test cohort, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

In the test cohort, hepatic artery diameters were significantly higher in high-risk GOV than in low-risk GOV [4.69 (4.31, 5.56) vs. 3.10 (2.59, 3.77), P < 0.001]. With a hepatic artery diameter cutoff value of 4.06 mm, the optimal area under the operating characteristic curve was 0.940 (95% confidence interval: 0.908-0.972), with a sensitivity of 0.887, a specificity of 0.892, a positive predictive value of 0.904, and a negative predictive value of 0.874 for identifying bleeding risk in the test cohort, while in the validation cohort, the sensitivity was 0.885, specificity was 0.939, positive predictive value was 0.920, and negative predictive value was 0.912.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic artery diameter has high diagnostic performance in identifying bleeding risk after GOV treatment.

No value of non-selective beta-blockers after TIPS-insertion

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) are a well-established treatment in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. However, their potential role after insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) still needs to be determined. Of note, recent studies suggested that favourable anti-inflammatory effects of NSBB might be independent from pressure reduction. This study aimed to evaluate whether NSBB-treatment is associated with amelioration of systemic inflammation (SI), hepatic decompensation and survival after TIPS-insertion.

METHODS

In a retrospective study comprising 305 consecutive patients, we investigated the impact of NSBB-intake at TIPS-placement on periinterventional cirrhosis-associated complications and continued NSBB-treatment after discharge on complications including hepatic decompensation and mortality during 1-year follow-up, employing multivariable competing-risk-analyses. In a prospective cohort including 45 patients, we performed a comprehensive analysis of SI analysing 48 soluble inflammatory markers (SIMs) at baseline plus 3 and 6 months after TIPS-insertion.

RESULTS

Overall, 175 (57.4%) patients received NSBB-therapy prior to TIPS-insertion; upon discharge, this decreased to 131 (22.9%), with 36 (27.5%) discontinuing NSBB within 1-year follow-up. Neither NSBB-therapy at TIPS-insertion nor treatment-continuation after discharge were associated with lower risks for hepatic decompensation, individual cirrhosis-associated complications or mortality neither in the periinterventional period nor during follow-up. Similarly, in the prospective cohort NSBB-intake was not linked to lower levels or a more prominent change of WBC, CRP or any other SIM at any of the investigated time points.

CONCLUSION

NSBB-therapy at the time of TIPS-insertion and its (dis-)continuation afterwards seems to have no significant impact on SI, development of hepatic decompensation and survival.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) for Treatment of Bleeding from Cardiofundal and Ectopic Varices in Cirrhosis

Acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis represents a critical clinical event that significantly impacts patient prognosis, with mortality rates increasing further after a second episode. This underscores the need for immediate intervention and optimal prophylaxis. The creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been proven to be highly effective for managing esophageal variceal bleeding. However, the use of TIPS for managing cardiofundal gastric varices and ectopic varices remains debated due to their unique vascular anatomy and the limited data available. These varices, although less prevalent than esophageal varices, are complex and heterogeneous vascular shunts between the splanchnic venous system and the systemic veins. Indeed, while endoscopic therapy with tissue adhesives is widely endorsed for achieving hemostasis in active hemorrhage, there is no consensus regarding the optimal approach for secondary prophylaxis. Recent research emphasizes the efficacy of endovascular techniques over endoscopic treatments, such as TIPS and endovascular variceal embolization techniques. This review examines the use of TIPS in managing acute variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, focusing specifically on cardiofundal gastric varices and ectopic varices, discussing optimal patient care based on the latest evidence, aiming to improve outcomes for this challenging subset of patients.

The network of cardiac KIR2.1: its function, cellular regulation, electrical signaling, diseases and new drug avenues

The functioning of the human heart relies on complex electrical and communication systems that coordinate cardiac contractions and sustain rhythmicity. One of the key players contributing to this intricate system is the KIR2.1 potassium ion channel, which is encoded by the KCNJ2 gene. KIR2.1 channels exhibit abundant expression in both ventricular myocytes and Purkinje fibers, exerting an important role in maintaining the balance of intracellular potassium ion levels within the heart. And by stabilizing the resting membrane potential and contributing to action potential repolarization, these channels have an important role in cardiac excitability also. Either gain- or loss-of-function mutations, but also acquired impairments of their function, are implicated in the pathogenesis of diverse types of cardiac arrhythmias. In this review, we aim to elucidate the system functions of KIR2.1 channels related to cellular electrical signaling, communication, and their contributions to cardiovascular disease. Based on this knowledge, we will discuss existing and new pharmacological avenues to modulate their function.

Noninvasive Assessment of Portal Hypertension

The progressive use of noninvasive tests (NITs) has changed the way hepatologists diagnose and manage patients with chronic liver disease, mainly because of their easiness to use and the ability to be repeated during follow-up. Liver stiffness measurement is the NIT with more scientific evidence. NITs have demonstrated to be useful to detect not only liver fibrosis but also the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension. Moreover, current evidence supports they can also be useful to evaluate the prognosis of patients with chronic liver disease.

Direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhosis: Rationale and current evidence

Cirrhosis is a major health concern worldwide with a complex pathophysiology affecting various biological systems, including all aspects of haemostasis. Bleeding risk is mainly driven by portal hypertension, but in end-stage liver disease it is further increased by alterations in haemostatic components, including platelet function, coagulation, and fibrinolysis. Concurrently, patients with cirrhosis are prone to venous thromboembolic events (VTE) because of the altered haemostatic balance, in particular an increase in thrombin generation. In patients with cirrhosis, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are currently the standard of care for VTE prevention, with VKA also being standard of care for stroke prevention in those with atrial fibrillation. However, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) could have specific advantages in this patient population. Clinical experience suggests that DOAC are a safe and possibly more effective alternative to traditional anticoagulants for the treatment of VTE in patients with compensated cirrhosis. In addition, emerging data suggest that primary prophylactic treatment with anticoagulants may improve clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis by reducing the risk of hepatic decompensation. The selection of the most appropriate DOAC remains to be clarified. This review focuses on the rationale for the use of DOAC in patients with cirrhosis, the specific effects of the different DOAC (as assessed by in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies), as well as clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis on DOAC.

Ascites affects the benefit of carvedilol on patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal and gastric varices

Esophageal and gastric varices (EGV) bleeding is a dangerous side effect of liver cirrhosis. Ascites may affect the effectiveness of carvedilol in preventing EGV rebleeding. A retrospective analysis was done on patients with EGV bleeding who visited our gastroenterology department between January 1, 2015, and October 29, 2020, and were given carvedilol therapy again. Patients were classified based on whether they had ascites. The primary outcome was EGV rebleeding. A total of 286 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 24.0 (19.0-42.0) months, comprising those without ascites (N = 155) and those with ascites (N = 131). The mean age of the patients was 55.15 ± 12.44 years, and 177 (61.9%) of them were men. There were 162 (56.6%) Child-Pugh A grades. The etiology of cirrhosis included 135 (47.2%) cases of hepatitis B. After carvedilol therapy, the patient's portal vein diameter (DPV) was widened (p < 0.05), velocity of portal vein (VPV) was slowed (p = 0.001). During the 1-year follow-up, patients with ascites had a substantially higher rebleeding rate than patients without ascites, with 24 (18.3%) versus 13 (8.4%), respectively (p = 0.013). On univariate analysis, ascites was a risk factor for rebleeding (p = 0.015). The multivariate analysis remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, etiology of cirrhosis, and previous endoscopic treatment, with OR of 2.37 (95% CI: 1.12-5.04; p = 0.025). Ascites was a risk factor for EGV rebleeding in patients undergoing carvedilol therapy. After carvedilol therapy, the patient's DPV was widened and VPV was slowed.

Review article: Recent advances in ascites and acute kidney injury management in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Better understanding of disease pathophysiology has led to advances in managing ascites and its associated complications including hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney Injury (HRS-AKI), especially medicinal and interventional advances.

AIM

To review the latest changes in the management of ascites and HRS-AKI.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in Pubmed, using the keywords cirrhosis, ascites, renal dysfunction, acute kidney injury, hepatorenal syndrome, beta-blockers, albumin, TIPS and vasoconstrictors, including only publications in English.

RESULTS

The medicinal advances include earlier treatment of clinically significant portal hypertension to delay the onset of ascites and the use of human albumin solution to attenuate systemic inflammation thus improving the haemodynamic changes associated with cirrhosis. Furthermore, new classes of drugs such as sodium glucose co-transporter 2 are being investigated for use in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. For HRS-AKI management, newer pharmacological agents such as vasopressin partial agonists and relaxin are being studied. Interventional advances include the refinement of TIPS technique and patient selection to improve outcomes in patients with refractory ascites. The development of the alfa pump system and the study of outcomes associated with the use of long-term palliative abdominal drain will also serve to improve the quality of life in patients with refractory ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

New treatment strategies emerged from better understanding of the pathophysiology of ascites and HRS-AKI have shown improved prognosis in these patients. The future will see many of these approaches confirmed in large multi-centre clinical trials with the aim to benefit the patients with ascites and HRS-AKI.

The influence of carvedilol posology timing on clinically significant portal hypertension: insights from elastography measurements

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Carvedilol has emerged as the preferred β-blocker for treating portal hypertension. However, there is still a debate in dosing regimen, with a potential lower bioavailability in once-daily regimens. The aim of this study is to assess the acute effects of carvedilol posology in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), as a surrogate marker of bioavailability.

METHODS

In this experimental study, 34 patients with CSPH receiving carvedilol twice daily were asked to suppress the night dose of carvedilol, creating a standardized 24-hour dose interval. Spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) were performed, with the exact interval between the last carvedilol administration and TE measurements consistently maintained at 24 hours and compared with values prior and under treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included, predominantly male (82.9%). SSM after suspending carvedilol for 24 hours [mean, 73.9kPa (SD, 17.0)] was significantly higher ( P < 0.001) than under treatment [mean, 56.3kPa (SD, 13.2)] and was not significantly different ( P = 0.908) from SSM prior to introduction of carvedilol [mean, 74.5kPa (SD, 12.4)]. Differences were also found in stratified analysis for carvedilol dosage, D'Amico classification stages, MELDNa scores, MELD3.0 scores, Child-Pugh class A and CSPH due to alcoholic cirrhosis. LSM after suspension was not significantly different from both under treatment and prior to treatment.

CONCLUSION

The differences in SSM after skipping one dose of carvedilol show both the importance of strict adherence to the prescribed dosing regimen to achieve the expected therapeutic benefits and the impact of twice daily prescription in bioavailability throughout the day.

Hepatocellular carcinoma, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors-targeting agents, and hypertension: A much more complicated relationship than expected

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) relationship with hypertension is a complicated phenomenon, mainly depending on the causes of the primary liver disease and the potential for drug interactions between concomitant medications and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors. Another interesting point worth exploring is how to treat hypertension in HCC patients under anticancer multikinase inhibitor therapy and the possible impact of certain antihypertensive agents on patients’ outcome.

Challenges in the Management of Esophagogastric Varices and Variceal Hemorrhage in Cirrhosis - A Narrative Review

Over the past decade, significant advancements in pharmacological, endoscopic, and radiographic treatments have emerged in the management of patients with cirrhosis and esophagogastric varices or variceal hemorrhage. These advances have been in several areas, including the role of screening and primary prophylaxis (preventing an initial variceal bleed), evaluation and management of acute esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage, and in preventing variceal rebleeding. Therefore, we believe there is a need for an updated, evidence-based "narrative review" on this important clinical topic that will be relevant for internists, hospitalists, intensive care unit physicians, and those in training. We believe the guidance presented in this narrative review will enhance daily medical practice of health care professionals and has the potential to improve quality of care for these complex patients.

Residual burden of liver disease after HCV clearance in hemophilia: a word of caution in the era of gene therapy

Ruling out advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis is mandatory for persons with hemophilia (PWH) who are candidates for gene therapy. However, clinical evaluation and noninvasive tests (NITs) may be inaccurate after hepatitis C virus (HCV) clearance. We conducted a prospective hepatological screening to detect advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis in PWH after HCV clearance. Any risk factor of chronic liver damage was registered by using biochemical data, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and ultrasound (US). A pre/post-HCV clearance analysis was conducted prospectively in a subgroup of patients who underwent LSM, US, and NITs for fibrosis. We evaluated 119 patients (median age, 53 years; range, 36-87 years) with a previous HCV infection (hemophilia A, n = 108; hemophilia B, n = 11). Ninety-six (81%) presented at least 1 potential risk factor of chronic liver damage. Metabolic risk factors were the most prevalent, with 51 patients (44%) having US steatosis. In 21 patients (18%), clinical, biochemical, liver morphology, and/or LSM were suggestive of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. Furthermore, 10 patients (8%) had esophageal varices and 3 (3%) had hepatocellular carcinoma. In 57 patients included in the prospective analysis, LSM and NITs were reduced after HCV clearance (P < .05), but US signs specific of cirrhosis remained unchanged. Overall, 23 of 80 patients (29%) with LSM <10 KPa had at least 1 US sign suggestive of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. A similar proportion (18%) was observed for LSM <8 KPa. Overall, risk factors of chronic liver damage are frequent after HCV clearance, but changes in LSM and NITs after clearance may be inaccurate to rule out advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis. A specific diagnostic workup is warranted to evaluate liver health in PWH in the era of gene therapy.

Compensated liver cirrhosis: Natural course and disease-modifying strategies

Compensated liver cirrhosis (CLC) is defined as cirrhosis with one or more decompensating events, such as ascites, variceal haemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy. Patients with CLC are largely asymptomatic with preserved hepatic function. The transition from CLC to decompensated cirrhosis occurs as a result of a complex interaction between multiple predisposing and precipitating factors. The first decompensation event in CLC patients is considered a significant turning point in the progression of cirrhosis, as it signals a drastic decline in median survival rates from 10-12 years to only 1-2 years. Furthermore, early cirrhosis has the potential to regress as liver fibrosis is a dynamic condition. With the advent of effective non-invasive tools for detecting hepatic fibrosis, more and more patients with CLC are currently being recognised. This offers clinicians a unique opportunity to properly manage such patients in order to achieve cirrhosis regression or, at the very least, prevent its progression. There are numerous emerging approaches for preventing or delaying decompensation in CLC patients. A growing body of evidence indicates that treating the underlying cause can lead to cirrhosis regression, and the use of non-selective beta-blockers can prevent decompensation by lowering portal hypertension. Additionally, addressing various cofactors (such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and alcoholism) and precipitating factors (such as infection, viral hepatitis, and hepatotoxic drugs) that have a detrimental impact on the natural course of cirrhosis may benefit patients with CLC. However, high-quality data must be generated through well-designed and adequately powered randomised clinical trials to validate these disease-modifying techniques for CLC patients. This article discussed the natural history of CLC, risk factors for its progression, and therapeutic approaches that could alter the trajectory of CLC evolution and improve outcomes.