Regulation outside the box: New mechanisms for small RNAs

An antisense oligomer conjugate with unpredicted bactericidal activity against Fusobacterium nucleatum

Fusobacteria are commensal members of the oral microbiome that can spread from their primary niche and colonize distal sites in the human body. Their enrichment in colorectal and breast cancer tissue has been associated with tumor growth, metastasis, and chemotherapeutic resistance. The use of non-selective antibiotics to remove fusobacteria impairs tumor progression, but prolonged application causes side effects, such as gastrointestinal problems and dysbiosis. Species-specific antisense antibiotics based on peptide nucleic acid (PNA) have shown efficacy in many gram-negative species, suggesting that antisense PNAs may also enable a tailored depletion of fusobacteria. Here, we have investigated the antibacterial potential of cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-PNA conjugates targeting the mRNA of putative essential genes in Fusobacterium nucleatum. Unexpectedly, we observed no growth inhibition with any of the target-specific PNAs but identified a non-targeting control CPP-PNA [FUS79, (RXR)4XB-GACATAATTGT] as a potent growth inhibitor of F. nucleatum. Our data suggest that the CPP and specific sequence features of FUS79 are responsible for its activity, rather than an antisense effect. Interestingly, FUS79 also inhibits the growth of five additional fusobacterial strains but not of F. nucleatum subsp. vincentii (FNV). RNA-seq analysis indicates that FUS79 induces a membrane stress response in a vulnerable F. nucleatum strain but not in FNV. Collectively, our attempt at developing antisense antibiotics for fusobacteria discovers a potent growth inhibitor, whose bactericidal effect appears independent of target-specific mRNA inhibition.IMPORTANCEEnrichment of F. nucleatum at cancer sites is associated with increased tumor growth and metastasis. Antibiotic treatment to remove the bacteria was shown to change the course of cancer progression. Here, we explore first steps to establish peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) as specific antisense antibiotics, thereby laying the foundation for further development of antisense technology in fusobacteria. Although the CPP-PNA FUS79 was initially designed as a control, we observed that the compound was bactericidal for specific fusobacterial strains. Our results suggest that FUS79 might be able to selectively deplete fusobacterial strains from bacterial communities, offering a new perspective on fusobacterial removal at the tumor site.

The Salmonella pathogenicity island 1-encoded small RNA InvR mediates post-transcriptional feedback control of the activator HilA in Salmonella

Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI1) encodes a Type-3 secretion system (T3SS) essential for Salmonella invasion of intestinal epithelial cells. Many environmental and regulatory signals control SPI1 gene expression, but in most cases, the molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Many regulatory signals control SPI1 at a post-transcriptional level, and we have identified a number of small RNAs (sRNAs) that control the SPI1 regulatory circuit. The transcriptional regulator HilA activates the expression of the genes encoding the SPI1 T3SS structural and primary effector proteins. Transcription of hilA is controlled by the AraC-like proteins HilD, HilC, and RtsA. The hilA mRNA 5' untranslated region (UTR) is ~350 nucleotides in length and binds the RNA chaperone Hfq, suggesting it is a likely target for sRNA-mediated regulation. We used rGRIL-seq (reverse global sRNA target identification by ligation and sequencing) to identify sRNAs that bind to the hilA 5' UTR. The rGRIL-seq data, along with genetic analyses, demonstrate the SPI1-encoded sRNA invasion gene-associated RNA (InvR) base pairs at a site overlapping the hilA ribosome binding site. HilD and HilC activate both invR and hilA. InvR, in turn, negatively regulates the translation of the hilA mRNA. Thus, the SPI1-encoded sRNA InvR acts as a negative feedback regulator of SPI1 expression. Our results suggest that InvR acts to fine-tune SPI1 expression and prevents overactivation of hilA expression, highlighting the complexity of sRNA regulatory inputs controlling SPI1 and Salmonella virulence.

IMPORTANCE

Salmonella Typhimurium infections pose a significant public health concern, leading to illnesses that range from mild gastroenteritis to severe systemic infection. Infection requires a complex apparatus that the bacterium uses to invade the intestinal epithelium. Understanding how Salmonella regulates this system is essential for addressing these infections effectively. Here, we show that the small RNA (sRNA) InvR imposes a negative feedback regulation on the expression of the invasion system. This work underscores the role of sRNAs in Salmonella's complex regulatory network, offering new insights into how these molecules contribute to bacterial adaptation and pathogenesis.

An sRNA overexpression library reveals AbnZ as a negative regulator of an essential translocation module in Caulobacter crescentus

Small RNAs (sRNAs) play a crucial role in modulating target gene expression through short base-pairing interactions and serve as integral components of many stress response pathways and regulatory circuits in bacteria. Transcriptome analyses have facilitated the annotation of dozens of sRNA candidates in the ubiquitous environmental model bacterium Caulobacter crescentus, but their physiological functions have not been systematically investigated so far. To address this gap, we have established CauloSOEP, a multi-copy plasmid library of C. crescentus sRNAs, which can be studied in a chosen genetic background and under select conditions. Demonstrating the power of CauloSOEP, we identified sRNA AbnZ to impair cell viability and morphology. AbnZ is processed from the 3' end of the polycistronic abn mRNA encoding the tripartite envelope-spanning efflux pump AcrAB-NodT. A combinatorial approach revealed the essential membrane translocation module TamAB as a target of AbnZ, implying that growth inhibition by AbnZ is linked to repression of this system.

The Salmonella pathogenicity island 1-encoded small RNA InvR mediates post-transcriptional feedback control of the activator HilA in Salmonella

Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI1) encodes a type three secretion system (T3SS) essential for Salmonella invasion of intestinal epithelial cells. Many environmental and regulatory signals control SPI1 gene expression, but in most cases, the molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Many of these regulatory signals control SPI1 at a post-transcriptional level and we have identified a number of small RNAs (sRNAs) that control the SPI1 regulatory circuit. The transcriptional regulator HilA activates expression of the genes encoding the SPI1 T3SS structural and primary effector proteins. Transcription of hilA is controlled by the AraC-like proteins HilD, HilC, and RtsA. The hilA mRNA 5' untranslated region (UTR) is ~350-nuclotides in length and binds the RNA chaperone Hfq, suggesting it is a likely target for sRNA-mediated regulation. We used the rGRIL-seq (reverse global sRNA target identification by ligation and sequencing) method to identify sRNAs that bind to the hilA 5' UTR. The rGRIL-seq data, along with genetic analyses, demonstrate that the SPI1-encoded sRNA InvR base pairs at a site overlapping the hilA ribosome binding site. HilD and HilC activate both invR and hilA. InvR in turn negatively regulates the translation of the hilA mRNA. Thus, the SPI1-encoded sRNA InvR acts as a negative feedback regulator of SPI1 expression. Our results suggest that InvR acts to fine-tune SPI1 expression and prevent overactivation of hilA expression, highlighting the complexity of sRNA regulatory inputs controlling SPI1 and Salmonella virulence.

RIL-seq reveals extensive involvement of small RNAs in virulence and capsule regulation in hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae

Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) can infect healthy individuals, in contrast to classical strains that commonly cause nosocomial infections. The recent convergence of hypervirulence with carbapenem-resistance in K. pneumoniae can potentially create 'superbugs' that are challenging to treat. Understanding virulence regulation of hvKp is thus critical. Accumulating evidence suggest that posttranscriptional regulation by small RNAs (sRNAs) plays a role in bacterial virulence, but it has hardly been studied in K. pneumoniae. We applied RIL-seq to a prototypical clinical isolate of hvKp to unravel the Hfq-dependent RNA-RNA interaction (RRI) network. The RRI network is dominated by sRNAs, including predicted novel sRNAs, three of which we validated experimentally. We constructed a stringent subnetwork composed of RRIs that involve at least one hvKp virulence-associated gene and identified the capsule gene loci as a hub target where multiple sRNAs interact. We found that the sRNA OmrB suppressed both capsule production and hypermucoviscosity when overexpressed. Furthermore, OmrB base-pairs within kvrA coding region and partially suppresses translation of the capsule regulator KvrA. This agrees with current understanding of capsule as a major virulence and fitness factor. It emphasizes the intricate regulatory control of bacterial phenotypes by sRNAs, particularly of genes critical to bacterial physiology and virulence.

Global Hfq-mediated RNA interactome of nitrogen starved Escherichia coli uncovers a conserved post-transcriptional regulatory axis required for optimal growth recovery

The RNA binding protein Hfq has a central role in the post-transcription control of gene expression in many bacteria. Numerous studies have mapped the transcriptome-wide Hfq-mediated RNA-RNA interactions in growing bacteria or bacteria that have entered short-term growth-arrest. To what extent post-transcriptional regulation underpins gene expression in growth-arrested bacteria remains unknown. Here, we used nitrogen (N) starvation as a model to study the Hfq-mediated RNA interactome as Escherichia coli enter, experience, and exit long-term growth arrest. We observe that the Hfq-mediated RNA interactome undergoes extensive changes during N starvation, with the conserved SdsR sRNA making the most interactions with different mRNA targets exclusively in long-term N-starved E. coli. Taking a proteomics approach, we reveal that in growth-arrested cells SdsR influences gene expression far beyond its direct mRNA targets. We demonstrate that the absence of SdsR significantly compromises the ability of the mutant bacteria to recover growth competitively from the long-term N-starved state and uncover a conserved post-transcriptional regulatory axis which underpins this process.

Understanding the Effect of Different Glucose Concentrations in the Oligotrophic Bacterium Bacillus subtilis BS-G1 through Transcriptomics Analysis

Glucose is an important carbon source for microbial growth, and its content in infertile soils is essential for the growth of bacteria. Since the mechanism of oligotrophic bacterium adaptation in barren soils is unclear, this research employed RNA-seq technology to examine the impact of glucose concentration on the oligotrophic bacterium B. subtilis BS-G1 in soil affected by desertification. A global transcriptome analysis (RNA-Seq) revealed that the significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) histidine metabolism, glutamate synthesis, the HIF-1 signaling pathway, sporulation, and the TCA cycle pathway of B. subtilis BS-G1 were significantly enriched with a 0.015 g/L glucose concentration (L group), compared to a 10 g/L glucose concentration (H group). The DEGs amino acid system, two-component system, metal ion transport, and nitrogen metabolism system of B. subtilis BS-G1 were significantly enriched in the 5 g/L glucose concentration (M group), compared with the H group. In addition, the present study identified the regulation pattern and key genes under a low-glucose environment (7 mRNAs and 16 sRNAs). This study primarily investigates the variances in the regulatory pathways of the oligotrophic B. subtilis BS-G1, which holds substantial importance in comprehending the mechanism underlying the limited sugar tolerance of oligotrophic bacteria.

Small RNAs, Large Networks: Posttranscriptional Regulons in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Small regulatory RNA (sRNAs) are key mediators of posttranscriptional gene control in bacteria. Assisted by RNA-binding proteins, a single sRNA often modulates the expression of dozens of genes, and thus sRNAs frequently adopt central roles in regulatory networks. Posttranscriptional regulation by sRNAs comes with several unique features that cannot be achieved by transcriptional regulators. However, for optimal network performance, transcriptional and posttranscriptional control mechanisms typically go hand-in-hand. This view is reflected by the ever-growing class of mixed network motifs involving sRNAs and transcription factors, which are ubiquitous in biology and whose regulatory properties we are beginning to understand. In addition, sRNA activity can be antagonized by base-pairing with sponge RNAs, adding yet another layer of complexity to these networks. In this article, we summarize the regulatory concepts underlying sRNA-mediated gene control in bacteria and discuss how sRNAs shape the output of a network, focusing on several key examples.

A Geneticist Transcribing the Chemical Language of Bacteria

The study of quorum sensing, bacterial cell-to-cell communication mediated by the production and detection of small molecule signals, has skyrocketed since its discovery in the last third of the 20th century. Building from early investigations of bacterial bioluminescence, the process has been characterized to control a numerous and growing number of group behaviors, including virulence and biofilm formation. Bonnie Bassler has made key contributions to the understanding of quorum sensing, leading interdisciplinary efforts to characterize key signaling pathway components and their respective signaling molecules across a range of gram-negative bacteria. This review highlights her work in the field, with a particular emphasis on the chemical contributions of her work.

Mining RNA-seq data reveals the massive regulon of GcvB small RNA and its physiological significance in maintaining amino acid homeostasis in Escherichia coli

Bacterial small RNAs regulate the expression of multiple genes through imperfect base-pairing with target mRNAs mediated by RNA chaperone proteins such as Hfq. GcvB is the master sRNA regulator of amino acid metabolism and transport in a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria. Recently, independent RNA-seq approaches identified a plethora of transcripts interacting with GcvB in Escherichia coli. In this study, the compilation of RIL-seq, CLASH, and MAPS data sets allowed us to identify GcvB targets with high accuracy. We validated 21 new GcvB targets repressed at the posttranscriptional level, raising the number of direct targets to >50 genes in E. coli. Among its multiple seed sequences, GcvB utilizes either R1 or R3 to regulate most of these targets. Furthermore, we demonstrated that both R1 and R3 seed sequences are required to fully repress the expression of gdhA, cstA, and sucC genes. In contrast, the ilvLXGMEDA polycistronic mRNA is targeted by GcvB through at least four individual binding sites in the mRNA. Finally, we revealed that GcvB is involved in the susceptibility of peptidase-deficient E. coli strain (Δpeps) to Ala-Gln dipeptide by regulating both Dpp dipeptide importer and YdeE dipeptide exporter via R1 and R3 seed sequences, respectively.

Glutamine synthetase mRNA releases sRNA from its 3'UTR to regulate carbon/nitrogen metabolic balance in Enterobacteriaceae

Glutamine synthetase (GS) is the key enzyme of nitrogen assimilation induced under nitrogen limiting conditions. The carbon skeleton of glutamate and glutamine, 2-oxoglutarate, is supplied from the TCA cycle, but how this metabolic flow is controlled in response to nitrogen availability remains unknown. We show that the expression of the E1o component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, SucA, is repressed under nitrogen limitation in Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli. The repression is exerted at the post-transcriptional level by an Hfq-dependent sRNA GlnZ generated from the 3'UTR of the GS-encoding glnA mRNA. Enterobacterial GlnZ variants contain a conserved seed sequence and primarily regulate sucA through base-pairing far upstream of the translation initiation region. During growth on glutamine as the nitrogen source, the glnA 3'UTR deletion mutants expressed SucA at higher levels than the S. enterica and E. coli wild-type strains, respectively. In E. coli, the transcriptional regulator Nac also participates in the repression of sucA. Lastly, this study clarifies that the release of GlnZ from the glnA mRNA by RNase E is essential for the post-transcriptional regulation of sucA. Thus, the mRNA coordinates the two independent functions to balance the supply and demand of the fundamental metabolites.

Checkpoints That Regulate Balanced Biosynthesis of Lipopolysaccharide and Its Essentiality in Escherichia coli

The outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, is essential for their viability. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) constitutes the major component of OM, providing the permeability barrier, and a tight balance exists between LPS and phospholipids amounts as both of these essential components use a common metabolic precursor. Hence, checkpoints are in place, right from the regulation of the first committed step in LPS biosynthesis mediated by LpxC through its turnover by FtsH and HslUV proteases in coordination with LPS assembly factors LapB and LapC. After the synthesis of LPS on the inner leaflet of the inner membrane (IM), LPS is flipped by the IM-located essential ATP-dependent transporter to the periplasmic face of IM, where it is picked up by the LPS transport complex spanning all three components of the cell envelope for its delivery to OM. MsbA exerts its intrinsic hydrocarbon ruler function as another checkpoint to transport hexa-acylated LPS as compared to underacylated LPS. Additional checkpoints in LPS assembly are: LapB-assisted coupling of LPS synthesis and translocation; cardiolipin presence when LPS is underacylated; the recruitment of RfaH transcriptional factor ensuring the transcription of LPS core biosynthetic genes; and the regulated incorporation of non-stoichiometric modifications, controlled by the stress-responsive RpoE sigma factor, small RNAs and two-component systems.

The Facts and Family Secrets of Plasmids That Replicate via the Rolling-Circle Mechanism

Plasmids are self-replicative DNA elements that are transferred between bacteria. Plasmids encode not only antibiotic resistance genes but also adaptive genes that allow their hosts to colonize new niches. Plasmid transfer is achieved by conjugation (or mobilization), phage-mediated transduction, and natural transformation. Thousands of plasmids use the rolling-circle mechanism for their propagation (RCR plasmids). They are ubiquitous, have a high copy number, exhibit a broad host range, and often can be mobilized among bacterial species. Based upon the replicon, RCR plasmids have been grouped into several families, the best known of them being pC194 and pUB110 (Rep_1 family), pMV158 and pE194 (Rep_2 family), and pT181 and pC221 (Rep_trans family). Genetic traits of RCR plasmids are analyzed concerning (i) replication mediated by a DNA-relaxing initiator protein and its interactions with the cognate DNA origin, (ii) lagging-strand origins of replication, (iii) antibiotic resistance genes, (iv) mobilization functions, (v) replication control, performed by proteins and/or antisense RNAs, and (vi) the participating host-encoded functions. The mobilization functions include a relaxase initiator of transfer (Mob), an origin of transfer, and one or two small auxiliary proteins. There is a family of relaxases, the MOB_V family represented by plasmid pMV158, which has been revisited and updated. Family secrets, like a putative open reading frame of unknown function, are reported. We conclude that basic research on RCR plasmids is of importance, and our perspectives contemplate the concept of One Earth because we should incorporate bacteria into our daily life by diminishing their virulence and, at the same time, respecting their genetic diversity.

A LysR-type transcriptional regulator controls the expression of numerous small RNAs in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Small RNAs (sRNAs) are universal posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression and hundreds of sRNAs are frequently found in each and every bacterium. In order to coordinate cellular processes in response to ambient conditions, many sRNAs are differentially expressed. Here, we asked how these small regulators are regulated using Agrobacterium tumefaciens as a model system. Among the best-studied sRNAs in this plant pathogen are AbcR1 regulating numerous ABC transporters and PmaR, a regulator of peptidoglycan biosynthesis, motility, and ampicillin resistance. We report that the LysR-type regulator VtlR (also known as LsrB) controls expression of AbcR1 and PmaR. A vtlR/lsrB deletion strain showed growth defects, was sensitive to antibiotics and severely compromised in plant tumor formation. Transcriptome profiling by RNA-sequencing revealed more than 1,200 genes with altered expression in the mutant. Consistent with the function of VtlR/LsrB as regulator of AbcR1, many ABC transporter genes were affected. Interestingly, the transcription factor did not only control the expression of AbcR1 and PmaR. In the mutant, 102 sRNA genes were significantly up- or downregulated. Thus, our study uncovered VtlR/LsrB as the master regulator of numerous sRNAs. Thereby, the transcriptional regulator harnesses the regulatory power of sRNAs to orchestrate the expression of distinct sub-regulons.

Regulation outside the box: New mechanisms for small RNAs

Regulation at the post‐transcriptional level is an important mode of gene expression control in bacteria. Small RNA regulators (sRNAs) that act via intramolecular base‐pairing with target mRNAs are key players in this process and most often sequester the target's ribosome binding site (RBS) to down‐regulate translation initiation. Over the past few years, several exceptions from this mechanism have been reported, revealing that sRNAs are able to influence translation initiation from a distance. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Azam and Vanderpool show that repression of the manY mRNA by the sRNA SgrS relies on an unconventional mechanism involving a translational enhancer element and ribosomal protein S1. Binding of S1 to an AU‐rich sequence within the 5ʹ untranslated region of the manY transcript promotes translation of the mRNA, and base‐pairing of SgrS to the same site can interfere with this process. Therefore, instead of blocking translation initiation by occluding the manY RBS, SgrS reduces ManY synthesis by inhibiting S1‐dependent translation activation. These findings increase the base‐pairing window for sRNA‐mediated gene expression control in bacteria and highlight the role of ribosomal protein S1 for translation initiation.