Transplant associated infections-The role of the gastrointestinal microbiota and potential therapeutic options

Kidney transplantation and gut microbiota

Kidney transplantation is an effective way to improve the condition of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, maintaining long-term graft function and improving patient survival remain a key challenge after kidney transplantation. Dysbiosis of intestinal flora has been reported to be associated with complications in renal transplant recipients. The commensal microbiota plays an important role in the immunomodulation of the transplant recipient responses. However, several processes, such as the use of perioperative antibiotics and high-dose immunosuppressants in renal transplant recipients, can lead to gut dysbiosis and disrupt the interaction between the microbiota and the host immune responses, which in turn can lead to complications such as infection and rejection in organ recipients. In this review, we summarize and discuss the changes in intestinal flora and their influencing factors in patients after renal transplantation as well as the evidence related to the impact of intestinal dysbiosis on the prognosis of renal transplantation from in vivo and clinical studies, and conclude with a discussion of the use of microbial therapy in the transplant population. Hopefully, a deeper understanding of the function and composition of the microbiota in patients after renal transplantation may assist in the development of clinical strategies to restore a normal microbiota and facilitate the clinical management of grafts in the future.

Advancements in understanding the role of intestinal dysbacteriosis mediated mucosal immunity in IgA nephropathy

IgA nephropathy, presently recognized as the foremost primary glomerular disorder, emerges as a principal contributor to renal failure globally, with its pathogenesis yet to be fully elucidated. Extensive research has highlighted the critical role of gut microbiome in the onset and progression of IgA nephropathy, underscoring its importance in accurately delineating the disease's etiology. For example, gut microbiome dysbacteriosis can lead to the production of nephritogenic IgA1 antibodies, which form immune complexes that deposit in the kidneys, causing inflammation and damage. The gut microbiome, a source of numerous bioactive compounds, interacts with the host and plays a regulatory role in gut-immune axis modulation, earning it the moniker of the "second brain." Recent investigations have particularly emphasized a significant correlation between IgA nephropathy and gut microbiome dysbacteriosis. This article offers a detailed overview of the pathogenic mechanisms of IgA nephropathy, specifically focusing on elucidating how alterations in the gut microbiome are associated with anomalies in the intestinal mucosal system in IgA nephropathy. Additionally, it describes the possible influence of gut microbiome on recurrent IgA nephropathy following kidney transplantation. Furthermore, it compiles potential therapeutic interventions, offering both theoretical and practical foundations for the management of IgA nephropathy. Lastly, the challenges currently faced in the therapeutic approaches to IgA nephropathy are discussed.

Targeting the Gut Microbiota in Kidney Disease: The Future in Renal Nutrition and Metabolism

There is increasing interest in the therapeutic potential of manipulating the gut microbiome of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This is because there is a substantial deviation from a balanced gut microbiota profile in CKD, with many deleterious downstream effects. Nutritional interventions such as plant-based diets with reduced animal protein intake and the use of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics may alter the microbiome. This article aims to briefly describe what is known about the gut microbiome in patients with CKD, factors contributing to gut dysbiosis, and outline important evidence gaps. Future potential therapies, including restoring the microbiota with food and microbiota-based and metabolomic-based therapies, are also discussed.

Blood, Gut, and Oral Microbiome in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background and Objective

Recent reports describe the existence of a blood microbiome profile not associated with an infection state. Given the high impact that the dysbiotic human microbiome appears to have in chronic kidney disease and, in particular, in the outcome of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), we aimed to explore the variations and correlations of the gut, oral, and blood microbiome of recipients, 3 months after kidney transplantation.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study where the microbiome of stool, saliva, and blood collected from recipients 3 months after kidney transplantation (N = 6) was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene using MiSeq Illumina® technology.

Results

Blood of KTRs harbors a distinct low-abundance microbiome dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Gut and oral microbiome of KTRs also present distinct profiles. The existence of a proportion of shared operational taxonomic units among the different body sites is reported, mainly classified as Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence of existence a blood microbiome in KTRs, different from the gut and the oral microbiome profiles, with a small number of operational taxonomic units representing a shared microbiome. The clinical relevance of this observation should be further explored in these patients.

The Effect of the Gut Microbiota on Transplanted Kidney Function

The intestinal microflora is extremely important, not only in the processes of absorption, digestion and biosynthesis of vitamins, but also in shaping the immune and cognitive functions of the human body. Several studies demonstrate a correlation between microbiota composition and such events as graft rejection, kidney interstitial fibrosis, urinary tract infections, and diarrhoea or graft tolerance. Some of those changes might be directly linked with pathologies such as colonization with pathogenic bacterial strains. Gut microbiota composition also plays an important role in metabolic complications and viral infections after transplantation. From the other side, gut microbiota might induce graft tolerance by promotion of T and B regulatory cells. Graft tolerance induction is still an extremely important issue regarding transplantology and might allow the reduction or even avoidance of immunosuppressive treatment. Although there is a rising evidence of the pivotal role of gut microbiota in aspects of kidney transplantation there is still a lack of knowledge on the direct mechanisms of microbiota action. Furthermore, some of those negative effects could be reversed by probiotics of faecal microbiota trapoinsplantation. While diabetes and hypertension as well as BKV and CMV viremia are common and important complications of transplantation, both worsening the graft function and causing systemic injuries, it opens up potential clinical treatment options. As has been also suggested in the current review, some bacterial subsets exhibit protective properties. However, currently, there is a lack of evidence on pro- and prebiotic supplementation in kidney transplant patients. In the current review, we describe the effect of the microbiota on the transplanted kidney in renal transplant recipients.

Gut microbiome and renal transplantation

Gut microbiome research has been a surge of interest in many branches of medicine in the last decade. Our main aim is to show ability of microbes to infuence the functions of human body, especially in the immune system, and on the other hand to clarify changes in composition of gut microbiome in the post-transplantation period and their function for the long-term survival of the graft and the patient in the context of the occurrence of a wide range of complications. Kidney transplantation with the subsequent use of immunosuppressants and antibiotics affects the composition of gut microbiome. The subsequent development of dysbiosis significantly increases the risk of acute rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy of the graft, post-transplant diarrhoea, organ´s infections and metabolic complications such as post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Also important is the influence of the microorganisms of the gut microbiome on metabolism of immunosuppressants with the production of less effective components and the subsequent necessity of modifying their levels with a higher risk of underdosing and the occurrence of graft rejection. Support of the composition of the gut microbiome in the post-transplantation period in favor of bacteria producing short chain fatty acids (SCFA) is possible by changing of diet with predominance of fiber, the application of probiotics, prebiotics. According to available studies, it can lead to benefits in term of metabolic compensation, to the induction of donor-specific tolerance and many others, with an overall improvement in the quality of patient and graft survival.

The Latest Developments in Immunomodulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions, Both Allogeneic and Autologous

Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is an endometrial fibrosis disease caused by repeated operations of the uterus and is a common cause of female infertility. In recent years, treatment using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been proposed by many researchers and is now widely used in clinics because of the low immunogenicity of MSCs. It is believed that allogeneic MSCs can be used to treat IUA because MSCs express only low levels of MHC class I molecules and no MHC class II or co-stimulatory molecules. However, many scholars still believe that the use of allogeneic MSCs to treat IUA may lead to immune rejection. Compared with allogeneic MSCs, autologous MSCs are safer, more ethical, and can better adapt to the body. Here, we review recently published articles on the immunomodulation of allogeneic and autologous MSCs in IUA therapy, with the aim of proving that the use of autologous MSCs can reduce the possibility of immune rejection in the treatment of IUAs.

Impact of gut microbiota on kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation is recognized as one of the most effective treatments for patients who suffer from end-stage renal disease. The major potential outcomes following kidney transplantation include engraftment, rejection, and associated complications. The outcomes are dependent on a variety of factors in those who underwent renal grafts or kidney transplant recipients. Those factors include the administration of immunosuppressive drugs and prophylactic antimicrobial agents to recipients. Recent studies have shown that gut microbiota play an important role in the outcome of subjects with kidney transplantation. An imbalance of the components/diversity of gut microbiota, known as gut dysbiosis, has been shown to have a big impact on the immune system of the host and the modification of host inflammatory cytokines. Although gut dysbiosis is affected by variation in diet and medication, a substantial amount of evidence showing a link between alteration in human gut microbiota and outcomes of kidney transplantation has recently been reported. Therefore, the objective of this review is to comprehensively summarize and discuss the major findings from in vivo and clinical data pertaining to the impact of gut microbiota on kidney transplantation. Any controversial findings are compiled to enable a clear overview of the role of gut microbiota and the outcome of kidney transplantation.

Microbiota, renal disease and renal transplantation

Aim of this frontier review has been to highlight the role of microbiota in healthy subjects and in patients affected by renal diseases with particular reference to renal transplantation. The microbiota has a relevant role in conditioning the healthy status and the diseases. In particular gut microbiota is essential in the metabolism of food and has a relevant role for its relationship with the immune system. The indigenous microbiota in patients with chronic renal failure is completely different than that of the healthy subjects and pathobionts appear. This abnormality in microbiota composition is called dysbiosis and may cause a rapid deterioration of the renal function both for activating the immune system and producing large quantity of uremic toxins. Similarly, after renal trans-plantation the microbiota changes with the appearance of pathobionts, principally in the first period because of the assumption of immunosuppressive drugs and antibiotics. These changes may deeply interfere with the graft outcome causing acute rejection, renal infections, diarrhea, and renal interstitial fibrosis. In addition, change in the microbiota may modify the metabolism of immuno-suppressive drugs causing in some patients the need of modifying the immunosuppressant dosing. The restoration of the indigenous microbiota after transplantation is important, either to avoiding the complications that impair the normal renal graft, and because recent studies have documented the role of an indigenous microbiota in inducing tolerance towards the graft. The use of prebiotics, probiotics, smart bacteria and diet modification may restore the indigenous microbiota, but these studies are just at their beginning and more data are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Induction therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells in kidney transplantation: a meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) versus traditional regimens for induction therapy in kidney transplantation (KT), especially the safety of MSC infusion, practicability of MSCs as induction therapy agents, and posttransplant complications.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library were searched for prospective clinical trials that compared MSCs with traditional regimens for induction therapy in KT.

Results

Four trials were included, including a total of 197 patients. The pooled results revealed that MSC therapy had a lower 1-year infection rate than did the traditional therapies (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46–0.9, P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two protocols regarding the 1-year acute rejection (AR) rate (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.41–1.45, P = 0.42), 1-year graft survival rate (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95–1.03, P = 0.74), delayed graft function (DGF) rate (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.21–1.38, P = 0.2) and renal graft function at 1 month (MD = −1.56, 95% CI: − 14.2–11.08, p = 0.81), 3 months (MD = 0.15, 95% CI: − 5.63–5.93, p = 0.96), 6 months (MD = − 1.95, 95% CI: − 9.87–5.97, p = 0.63), and 12 months (MD = − 1.13, 95% CI: − 7.16–4.89, p = 0.71) postsurgery. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the 1-year AR rate, 1-year graft survival rate, DGF rate, and renal graft function at 12 months postsurgery did not significantly differ between the low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) group and the standard-dose CNI group, indicating the potential benefits of successful CNI sparing in combination with MSC treatment. Moreover, when MSCs were applied as an alternative therapy rather than an additional therapy or allogeneic MSCs were utilized instead of autologous MSCs, all of the outcomes mentioned above were comparable.

Conclusion

Induction therapy with MSCs is safe and has similar immune response modulation effects to those of traditional regimens in the short term in KT recipients. However, regarding the long-term effects, as suggested by the 1-year infection rate and the potential of CNI sparing, MSC therapy has significant advantages. However, these advantages should be further verified in more well-designed, multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with large sample sizes and long follow-up periods.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-021-02219-7.

Patient-Reported Gastrointestinal Symptoms and the Association With Quality of Life Following Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There has been limited study of the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and their impact on the quality of life (QOL) in kidney transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and predictors of gastrointestinal symptoms and the association with QOL in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

All chronic kidney transplant recipients at the Princess Alexandra Hospital were provided with 3 questionnaires, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS), and Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (SAGIS) scale, to ascertain QOL impairment and to screen gastrointestinal symptom severity. Linear regression was used to determine the predictors of gastrointestinal QOL and gastrointestinal symptom severity.

RESULTS

Of the 343 participants, the median age was 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 36-55) years, 58% were men, 79% were white, 39% had chronic glomerulonephritis, 83% had received their first graft, and median time since transplant was 6.3 (IQR 1.8-13.1) years. Using GSRS, 88% of participants reported at least 1 gastrointestinal symptom, most commonly indigestion (57%) and diarrhea (54%). Using GIQLI, 42% and 38% of participants reported mild and moderate QOL impairment, respectively. Gastrointestinal symptoms were predicted by female sex (coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.02) and mycophenolate (coefficient 0.0001, 95% CI 0.0001 to 0.0002), and were associated with poorer QOL (coefficient -0.38, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.30). Similar findings were observed using SAGIS for gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal symptoms are frequent in kidney transplant recipients, particularly in women and those receiving mycophenolate, and are strongly associated with poorer QOL.

A Study on the Correlations of Anxiety and Depression With Self-Management Ability and Endogenous Creatinine Clearance Rate in Renal Transplant Recipients

Objective: To explore the effects of anxiety and depression on the self-management ability and endogenous creatinine clearance rate of renal transplant patients. Method: Eighty-eight renal transplant recipients who were followed up in the outpatient clinic of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University were selected using convenient sampling. The self-made general data sheet, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale, and Self-Management Scale for Kidney Transplant Recipients were used. Correlation analysis was used to find factors related to endogenous creatinine clearance, while multiple linear regression was used to identify factors influencing endogenous creatinine clearance. Patients with or without anxiety and depression were divided into groups, and the indexes of the groups were compared using the independent samples t test, rank-sum test, or chi-squared test. Results: Anxiety was present in 12.5% of patients, depression in 25%, and a moderate level of self-management in 34.1%. Only 9.1% of renal transplant recipients had endogenous creatinine clearance within the normal range, and 34.1% had a body mass index not in the normal range (25% were overweight, and 9.1% were underweight). The endogenous creatinine clearance rate was negatively correlated with age and degree of depression, and positively correlated with body mass index, treatment management score, and psychosocial management score. The main influencing factors of endogenous creatinine clearance rate were age, sex, depression, body mass index, and treatment management score. The endogenous creatinine clearance rate and psychosocial management ability were significantly higher in patients without anxiety and depression than in patients with anxiety and depression (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Anxiety and depression showed significant negative effects on the psychosocial self-management ability and endogenous creatinine clearance rate of renal transplant recipients and thus should be given more attention.