A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover-style trial of buspirone in functional dysphagia and ineffective esophageal motility

Long-term Prognosis and Prognostic Factors in Ineffective Esophageal Motility

Background/Aims

Ineffective esophageal motility is the most frequent disorder of esophageal peristalsis. Symptoms may include dysphagia, chest pain, and heartburn. Our aims are to evaluate the long-term prognosis and determine if provocative tests during high-resolution esophageal manometry could predict the prognosis.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed high resolution manometries performed between 2015-2018 in adult patients. Symptoms were evaluated at baseline and at follow-up (median 39 months later) using the impact dysphagia questionnaire (IDQ-10), where a score ≥ 7 defined dysphagia, the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ), where a score ≥ 9 defined symptoms of reflux disease and if the subject had chest pain ≥ once a week. Chicago classifications version 3.0 and 4.0 were used. The contractile reserve was assessed by identifying whether esophageal peristalsis normalized or not on solid bolus swallows and a rapid drink challenge was included.

Results

Nine hundred and eighty investigations performed during the study period; 114 patients (11.6%) were identified with ineffective esophageal motility. The final study cohort consisted of 33 patients of which 42% had dysphagia at follow-up and 25% had chest pain at least once a week, 46% had reflux symptoms. Patients who normalized motility on solid bolus swallows reported less dysphagia upon follow-up (P = 0.012), nevertheless reported similar proportions of chest pain (P = 0.632), and reflux (P = 0.514). There were no associations between having dysphagia, chest pain, or reflux at follow-up, and abnormal findings on the rapid drink challenge (P > 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

Patients with ineffective esophageal motility continue to experience long-term esophageal symptoms at follow-up. Provocative tests seem to have the potential to partly predict the long-term prognosis of dysphagia.

Effect of Buspirone on Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background/Aims

Buspirone shows promise in treating disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), particularly functional dyspepsia. However, findings have been mixed.

Methods

We systematically searched for prospective studies testing buspirone for any upper gastrointestinal DGBI in 4 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycInfo). The primary outcome was any validated measure of gastrointestinal symptoms. Anxiety, depression and adverse events were secondary outcomes. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference (SMD) in post-treatment scores between buspirone and control groups. Risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) scale.

Results

Ten studies (n = 283) met inclusion criteria, comprising 5 RCTs, 1 N-of-1 trial, 1 cohort, 1 case series, and 2 case reports. Tolerability of buspirone was good. In meta-analysis, buspirone produced a non-significant improvement in functional dyspepsia/gastroparesis symptoms compared to placebo (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.17; P = 0.39; I2 = 0%; Nstudies = 3). Of individual symptoms, buspirone improved bloating severity more than placebo (SMD = -0.41; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.04; P = 0.03; Nstudies = 2) but did not improve post-prandial fullness (P = 0.24, Nstudies = 2) or nausea (P = 0.75, Nstudies = 2). All RCTs included in the meta-analysis were good quality but most treated for only 4 weeks.

Conclusions

We found that buspirone did not improve functional dyspepsia symptoms more than placebo, though studies were small. Buspirone showed benefit for bloating severity, albeit based on few studies. Larger and longer trials of buspirone, targeting more defined groups such as patients with bloating, are warranted.

Central neuromodulators for patients with functional esophageal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUD

The use of neuromodulators is prevalent in various functional gastrointestinal disease. However, data concerning the outcomes of these treatments in functional esophageal disorders (FED) remains limited and inadequate.

AIMS

The aim of the present study is to examine the efficacy of central neuromodulators in FED.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library databases from inception to April 2023. Randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of neuromodulators and placebos on FED are included. Primary outcome is the symptom improvement, and Rome IV criteria is used to assess eligible studies.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized controlled studies (three for functional chest pain, four for reflux hypersensitivity/functional heartburn, three for globus, and one for functional dysphagia) were included in the final analysis. Neuromodulators reduced chest pain by 52%-71% in patients with functional chest pain, and alleviated symptom by 46%-75% in patients with globus (n = 3, Odds ratio 6.30, 95% confidence interval 4.17-9.50). However, the results were inconsistent for reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn. There was a lack of convincing evidence to support the use of neuromodulators for functional dysphagia. The use of neuromodulators did not have a significant impact on the quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional chest pain and globus may potentially benefit from the use of neuromodulators, but their effectiveness for functional dysphagia, functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity remains controversial. More controlled trials are needed to confirm the therapeutic effects on these conditions.

Current Approach to Dysphagia: A Review Focusing on Esophageal Motility Disorders and Their Treatment

Background

Dysphagia is a prevalent condition which may severely impact the patient's quality of life. However, there are still lacking standardized therapeutic options for esophageal motility disorders.

Summary

Dysphagia is defined as a subjective sensation of difficulty swallowing which can result from oropharyngeal or esophageal etiologies. Regarding esophageal dysphagia, after excluding structural causes and esophageal mucosal lesions, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. HRM has not only improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia but has also expanded our understanding of spastic and hypomotility disorders of the esophageal body. The Chicago Classification v4.0 uses a hierarchical approach and provides a standardized diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders, allowing a tailored therapeutic approach. Dysphagia is often a long-term health problem that broadly impacts health and well-being and leads to physical and psychosocial disability, namely, malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia, as well as social isolation, depression, and anxiety. Apart from achalasia, most esophageal motility disorders tend to have a benign long-term course with symptoms of dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain that can improve significantly over time. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are self-assessment tools that capture the patients' illness experience and help providers better understand symptoms from the patients' perspective. Therefore, PROs have a critical role in providing patient-centered care.

Key Messages

Motility disorders should be ruled out in the presence of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia, and treatment options should be considered according to the severity of symptoms reported by the patient.

Associations Between Patterns of Esophageal Dysmotility and Extra-Intestinal Features in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The gastrointestinal tract is commonly involved in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) with varied manifestations. As our understanding of SSc gastrointestinal disease pathogenesis and risk stratification is limited, we sought to investigate whether patterns of esophageal dysfunction associate with specific clinical phenotypes in SSc.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry who completed high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) studies as part of their clinical care between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Associations between esophageal abnormalities on HREM (absent contractility [AC], ineffective esophageal motility [IEM], hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter [hypoLES]) and patient demographic information, clinical characteristics, and autoantibody profiles were examined.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients with SSc had HREM data. Sixty-five patients (68.4%) had AC (37 patients with only AC, 28 patients with AC and a hypoLES), 9 patients (9.5%) had IEM, and 11 patients (11.6%) had normal studies. AC was significantly associated with diffuse cutaneous disease (38.5% versus 10.0%; P < 0.01), more severe Raynaud's phenomenon, including digital pits, ulcers, or gangrene (56.9% versus 30.0%; P = 0.02), and reduced median diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (50.6% versus 72.2%; P = 0.03). AC was observed in most of the patients who died (13 of 14; P = 0.06). These findings were not seen in patients with IEM.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with SSc, AC is associated with a significantly more severe clinical phenotype. IEM may associate with a milder phenotype. Further studies are needed to evaluate AC, IEM, and their clinical impact relative to the timing of other end-organ complications in SSc.

Evaluation of Therapeutic Effect of Buspirone in Improving Dysphagia in Patients with GERD and Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is the most common esophageal motility disorder associated with low-to-moderate amplitude contractions in the distal esophagus in manometric evaluations. Despite recent new conceptions regarding the pathophysiology of esophageal motility and IEM, there are still no effective therapeutic interventions for the treatment of this disorder. This study aimed to investigate the effect of buspirone in the treatment of concomitant IEM and GERD. Methods and Materials: The present study was a randomized clinical trial conducted at the Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran. Patients with a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and dysphagia underwent upper endoscopy to rule out any mechanical obstruction and were diagnosed with an ineffective esophageal motility disorder based on high-resolution manometry. They were given a package containing the desired medication(s); half of the packets contained 10 mg (for 30 days) of buspirone and 40 mg (for 30 days) of pantoprazole, and the other half contained only 40 mg (for 30 days) of pantoprazole. Dysphagia was scored based on the Mayo score, as well as a table of dysphagia severity. Manometric variables were recorded before and after the treatment. Results: Thirty patients (15 pantoprazole and 15 pantoprazole plus buspirone) were included. Females comprised 63.3% of the population, with a mean age of 46.33 ± 11.15. The MAYO score and resting LES pressure significantly changed after treatment. The MAYO and Swallowing Disorder Questionnaire scores significantly decreased after treatment in both groups of patients. Our results revealed that the post-intervention values of manometric variables differed significantly between the two groups after controlling for the baseline values of the variables. This analysis did not demonstrate the superiority of buspirone. Conclusion: Buspirone seems to have no superiority over PPI. Treatment with concomitant IEM and GERD using proton pump inhibitors improves the patient’s clinical condition and quality of life. However, adding buspirone to the treatment regimen did not appear to make a significant difference in patient treatment.

Dysphagia Worsens With Increasing Ineffective Swallows Among Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility

INTRODUCTION

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is the most common motility disorder identified on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM), but patients with this finding may be asymptomatic. Therefore, we aimed to identify specific HRM findings predictive of symptoms in IEM.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 y) who underwent HRM between March 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively evaluated and reclassified according to Chicago Classification 4.0 (CC4.0). Demographic information, HRM parameters, and gastroesophageal reflux disease Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire responses were captured among those with normal manometry or IEM. We evaluated the association between heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia, with respect to HRM findings including ineffective swallows.

RESULTS

Of 379 patients, 243 (64.1%) had a normal manometry, 136 (35.9%) were on IEM spectrum, and 73 (19.3%) had conclusive IEM by CC4.0. Mean dysphagia scores were significantly higher in those with conclusive IEM compared with those with normal HRM (2.00 vs. 1.36, P=0.002), as was the percentage of individuals reporting dysphagia affecting daily activities (21.9% vs. 11.4%, P=0.02). Heartburn and regurgitation symptoms did not differ between groups. In a multivariable model of IEM patients, the percentage of ineffective swallows independently predicted a higher dysphagia burden (β regression coefficient: 0.032, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the CC4.0 definition for conclusive IEM identifies a group of patients with worse dysphagia symptoms. Within this group, the percentage of ineffective swallows was an independent predictor of dysphagia severity. These findings may help practitioners and patients contextualize the heterogeneous diagnosis of IEM.

Neurochemical classification of serotonin-immunoreactive neurons co-innervating motor endplates in the mouse esophagus

Serotonin immunoreactivity was previously found in myenteric neurons co-innervating motor endplates in the mouse esophagus striated muscle and an involvement in motility control was suggested. However, it is not known if other neuroactive substances are present in these neurons and to what extent they co-localize. First, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was established as a bona fide marker for putative inhibitory myenteric neurons by evaluating co-localization with neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and neuropeptide Y (NPY). Then, co-localization of serotonin and VIP was tested in co-innervating axons on motor endplates, which were visualized with α-bungarotoxin (α-BT) by multilabel immunofluorescence. Myenteric ganglia were also surveyed for co-localization in neuronal perikarya and varicosities. nNOS, NPY, and VIP were completely co-localized in enteric co-innervating nerve terminals on motor endplates. After co-staining with VIP, we found (a) serotonin (5-HT)-positive nerve endings without VIP (44% of 5-HT-positively innervated endplates), (b) 5-HT- and VIP-positive endings without co-localization (35%), and (c) 5-HT- and VIP-positive endings with co-localization (21%). About one-fifth of nerve terminals on motor endplates containing 5-HT originate from putative inhibitory peptidegic nitrergic neurons. However, the majority represents a different population presumably subserving different functions.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Dysphagia is a common symptom with significant impact on quality of life. Our diagnostic armamentarium was primarily limited to endoscopy and barium esophagram until the advent of manometric techniques in the 1970s, which provided the first reliable tool for assessment of esophageal motor function. Since that time, significant advances have been made over the last 3 decades in our understanding of various esophageal motility disorders due to improvement in diagnostics with high-resolution esophageal manometry. High-resolution esophageal manometry has improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia and has also enhanced our understanding of spastic and hypomotility disorders of the esophageal body. In this review, we discuss the current approach to diagnosis and therapeutics of various esophageal motility disorders.

Effectiveness of Buspirone in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a relatively common disorder whose pathogenesis has yet been poorly understood. There are still debates concerning definitions and the best possible treatments for this disorder. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of buspirone, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT)1A agonist, in improving the symptoms and quality of life (QoL) as well as psychological dimensions in patients with FD. METHODS This study was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial performed on 30 patients with FD, residing in the city of Sari, northern Iran, from December 2017 to October 2018. Consecutive patients referring to a tertiary hospital with a clinical diagnosis of FD, according to the Rome IV criteria, were recruited. All patients were ethnically Persian and had normal upper endoscopy and negative histological evaluation results for any gastrointestinal disease or helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection while evaluating biopsy samples endoscopically. Exclusion criteria were being diagnosed with major psychiatric disorders, suicidal thoughts, recent treatments with psychoactive drugs, as well as major cognitive impairments. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either buspirone (n=18) or placebo (n=12) for two months. The first group received buspirone 5mg three times a day for the first month and 10mg three times a day for the second month. During the treatment course, the patients were advised to report any adverse reactions. Also, both groups were evaluated by three questionnaires [demographic characteristics form, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), The Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (SF-LDQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS)] at the baseline and at the end of the 8th week by a blinded psychologist. Finally, data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 18). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS The most common symptoms of the patients were FD followed by heartburn. No significant differences were observed between buspirone and placebo groups regarding QoL (p=0.58), anxiety and depression (p =0.36), and severity and frequency of FD symptoms (p =0.22) before and after the intervention. In both groups, the overall QoL as well as HADS and SF-LDQ scores had significantly improved at the end of the study compared with the baseline. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate no significant effects associated with buspirone on the clinical course of FD, compared with placebo. More studies are needed to introduce effective therapies according to the pathophysiology of FD.

Chicago Classification update (V4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and absent contractility

Esophageal hypomotility disorders manifest with abnormal esophageal body contraction vigor, breaks in peristaltic integrity, or failure of peristalsis in the context of normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). The Chicago Classification version 4.0 recognizes two hypomotility disorders, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and absent contractility, while fragmented peristalsis has been incorporated into the IEM definition. Updated criteria for ineffective swallows consist of weak esophageal body contraction vigor measured using distal contractile integral (DCI, 100-450 mmHg·cm·s), transition zone defects >5 cm measured using a 20 mmHg isobaric contour, or failure of peristalsis (DCI < 100 mmHg·cm·s). More than 70% ineffective swallows and/or ≥50% failed swallows are required for a conclusive diagnosis of IEM. When the diagnosis is inconclusive (50%-70% ineffective swallows), supplementary evidence from multiple rapid swallows (absence of contraction reserve), barium radiography (abnormal bolus clearance), or HRM with impedance (abnormal bolus clearance) could support a diagnosis of IEM. Absent contractility requires 100% failed peristalsis, consistent with previous versions of the classification. Consideration needs to be given for the possibility of achalasia in absent contractility with dysphagia despite normal IRP, and alternate complementary tests (including timed upright barium esophagram and functional lumen imaging probe) are recommended to confirm or refute the presence of achalasia. Future research to quantify esophageal bolus retention on stationary HRM with impedance and to understand contraction vigor thresholds that predict bolus clearance will provide further refinement to diagnostic criteria for esophageal hypomotility disorders in future iterations of the Chicago Classification.

Management of Ineffective Esophageal Hypomotility

Esophageal hypomotility in general and especially ineffective esophageal motility according to the Chicago criteria of primary motility disorders of the esophagus, is one of the most frequently diagnosed motility disorders on high resolution manometry and results in a large number of patients visiting gastroenterologists. Most patients with esophageal hypomotility present with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms or dysphagia. The clinical relevance of the motility pattern, however, is not well established but seems to be correlated with disease severity in reflux patients. The correlation with dysphagia is less clear. Prokinetic agents are commonly prescribed as first line pharmacologic intervention to target esophageal smooth muscle contractility and improve esophageal motor functions. However, the beneficial effects of these medications are limited and only confined to some specific drugs. Serotonergic agents, including buspirone, mosapride and prucalopride have been shown to improve parameters of esophageal motility although the effect on symptoms is less clear. Understanding on the complex correlation between esophageal hypomotility and esophageal symptoms as well as the limited evidence of prokinetic agents is necessary for physicians to appropriately manage patients with Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM).

European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) recommendations for the use of high-resolution manometry of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Several patients in gastroenterology practice present with esophageal symptoms, and in case of normal endoscopy with biopsies, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is often the next step. Our aim was to develop a European consensus on the clinical application of esophageal HRM, to offer the clinician guidance in selecting patients for HRM and using its results to optimize clinical outcome.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus was initiated with 38 multidisciplinary experts from 16 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 71 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 33 statements.

RESULTS

The process generated guidance on when to consider esophageal HRM, how to perform it, and how to generate the report. The Delphi process also identified several areas of uncertainty, such as the choice of catheters, the duration of fasting and the position in which HRM is performed, but recommended to perform at least 10 5-ml swallows in supine position for each study. Postprandial combined HRM impedance is considered useful for diagnosing rumination. There is a large lack of consensus on treatment implications of HRM findings, which is probably the single area requiring future targeted research.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

A multinational and multidisciplinary group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on technical aspects, indications, performance, analysis, diagnosis, and therapeutic implications of esophageal HRM.

Effects of Pyridostigmine on Esophageal and Pharyngeal Motility in Dysphagic Patients Undergoing High-Resolution Manometry

Weak or absent peristalsis of the esophageal musculature is a common finding in ambulatory patients suffering from dysphagia and frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux. There is currently no pharmacologic intervention that reliably improves esophageal contractility in patients suffering from various esophageal motility disorders. Our objective was to evaluate the acute effects of pyridostigmine on high-resolution manometry parameters in patients suffering from dysphagia with evidence of esophageal dysmotility. Pyridostigmine is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor which increases effective concentrations of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction of both striated and smooth muscle cells. We conducted a prospective crossover study of five patients with dysphagia and proven esophageal dysmotility. Three patients had baseline ineffective esophageal motility and two had achalasia. Patients underwent pharyngeal and esophageal manometry before and after pyridostigmine administration. The median distal contractile integral (DCI), a marker of esophageal contractile vigor, was significantly higher post pyridostigmine administration 3001 (1950.3-3703.2) mmHg × s × cm compared to pre-pyridostigmine DCI of 1229.9 (956.2-2100) mmHg × s × cm; P < 0.001. Pre-pyridostigmine 18/25 (72%) of the patient's swallows was peristaltic compared to 25/25 (100%) post-pyridostigmine; P < 0.005. No other pharyngeal or esophageal high-resolution manometry parameter differed significantly after pyridostigmine administration. The results of this pilot study demonstrate that pyridostigmine acutely improves esophageal contractile vigor in patients suffering from dysphagia with esophageal dysmotility. Further investigation with larger sample size, longer follow-up, side effect profile, and patient-reported outcome measures is still needed to determine the clinical usefulness of pyridostigmine in specific disorders of esophageal motility.

Understanding the relationship between esophageal motor disorders and reflux disease

INTRODUCTION

The management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients is often complex as the clinical presentation is heterogeneous and the mechanisms underlying symptoms are multifactorial. In the past decades, investigations conducted with conventional manometry and, above all, the more accurate high resolution manometry (HRM), helped us in exploring the field of esophageal motility and in understanding the link between motor features and GERD pathogenesis.

AREAS COVERED

Several studies carried out with conventional manometry and HRM have confirmed a relevant role of esophageal motor function in GERD pathogenesis. In particular, HRM studies have shown a direct correlation between impaired esophageal body motility, disruption of the esophagogastric junction and reflux burden. These findings impact the clinical and therapeutical management of GERD patients. Moreover, HRM findings might be helpful in evaluating patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) resistance and inconclusive evidences of GERD.

EXPERT OPINION

The relationship between esophageal motility and GERD pathogenesis needs to be further evaluated by multicenter outcome studies involving a large number of GERD patients and healthy controls. However, other more promising areas could be progressed.

Non-acid Reflux: When It Matters and Approach to Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review focuses on the presentation, contributing factors, diagnosis, and treatment of non-acid reflux. We also propose algorithms for diagnosis and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a paucity of recent data regarding non-acid reflux. The recent Porto and Lyon consensus statements do not fully address non-acid reflux or give guidance on classification. However, recent developments in the lung transplantation field, as well as older data in the general population, argue for the importance of non-acid reflux. Extrapolating from the Porto and Lyon consensus, we generally classify pathologic non-acid reflux as impedance events > 80, acid exposure time < 4%, and positive symptom correlation on a standard 24-h pH/impedance test. Other groups not meeting this criteria also deserve consideration depending on the clinical situation. Potential treatments include lifestyle modification, increased acid suppression, alginates, treatment of esophageal hypersensitivity, baclofen, buspirone, prokinetics, and anti-reflux surgery in highly selected individuals. More research is needed to clarify appropriate classification, with subsequent focus on targeted treatments.

New Developments in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine recent key developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer research has suggested cytokine-mediated inflammation may play a role in the physiology of GERD, implying that the underlying mechanism may not be entirely related to chemical damage due to acid. Aided by novel technologies, diagnostic testing is also moving toward elucidating individual mechanisms and better defining specific GERD phenotypes with the goal of providing directed therapy. This is especially important in current times given the increase in coverage of adverse events reportedly linked to long-term proton pump inhibitor use.

SUMMARY

As patients are looking for potential alternatives, we highlight the key recent updates in pathophysiology and understanding of GERD and current medical and endoscopic/surgical options and explore the exciting treatments in the pipeline.

Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium

BACKGROUND

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a heterogenous minor motility disorder diagnosed when ≥50% ineffective peristaltic sequences (distal contractile integral <450 mm Hg cm s) coexist with normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure < upper limit of normal) on esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM). Ineffective esophageal motility is not consistently related to disease states or symptoms and may be seen in asymptomatic healthy individuals.

PURPOSE

A 1-day symposium of esophageal experts reviewed existing literature on IEM, and this review represents the conclusions from the symposium. Severe IEM (>70% ineffective sequences) is associated with higher esophageal reflux burden, particularly while supine, but milder variants do not progress over time or consistently impact quality of life. Ineffective esophageal motility can be further characterized using provocative maneuvers during HRM, especially multiple rapid swallows, where augmentation of smooth muscle contraction defines contraction reserve. The presence of contraction reserve may predict better prognosis, lesser reflux burden and confidence in a standard fundoplication for surgical management of reflux. Other provocative maneuvers (solid swallows, standardized test meal, rapid drink challenge) are useful to characterize bolus transit in IEM. No effective pharmacotherapy exists, and current managements target symptoms and concurrent reflux. Novel testing modalities (baseline and mucosal impedance, functional lumen imaging probe) show promise in elucidating pathophysiology and stratifying IEM phenotypes. Specific prokinetic agents targeting esophageal smooth muscle need to be developed for precision management.