European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) recommendations for the use of high-resolution manometry of the esophagus

European Guideline on Chronic Nausea and Vomiting-A UEG and ESNM Consensus for Clinical Management

INTRODUCTION

Chronic nausea and vomiting are symptoms of a wide range of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal conditions. Diagnosis can be challenging and requires a systematic and well-structured approach. If the initial investigation for structural, toxic and metabolic disorders is negative, digestive motility and gut-brain interaction disorders should be assessed. United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and the European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) identified the need for an updated, evidence-based clinical guideline for the management of chronic nausea and vomiting.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of experts in the field, including European specialists and national societies, participated in the development of the guideline. Relevant questions were addressed through a literature review and statements were developed and voted on according to a Delphi process.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight statements were identified and voted following the Delphi process. Overall agreement was high, although the grade of scientific evidence was low in many areas. Disagreement was more evident for some pharmacological treatment options. A diagnostic algorithm was developed, focussing on the differentiating features between gastrointestinal motility and gut-brain interaction disorders with predominant nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an evidence-based framework for the evaluation and treatment of patients with chronic nausea and vomiting.

Esophageal Intelligence: Implementing Artificial Intelligence Into the Diagnostics of Esophageal Motility and Impedance pH Monitoring

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) encompass a range of functional abnormalities, including achalasia, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), and distal esophageal spasm (DES). Diagnostic modalities like high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP), and impedance analysis are invaluable but often limited by interpretive variability and the need for expert analysis. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in addressing these challenges. This manuscript explores the integration of AI in EMD diagnostics, showcasing its ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy, optimize workflows, and standardize interpretation across centers. Advanced algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and machine learning (ML) models, achieve high accuracy in automating classifications, subtyping disorders like achalasia, and improving diagnostic consistency. Furthermore, AI's predictive capabilities extend to treatment outcome modeling, enabling personalized care strategies and longitudinal tracking. AI also offers significant potential in medical education by reducing learning curves and standardizing esophageal motility interpretation training. These advancements collectively emphasize the role of AI in revolutionizing EMD diagnosis, treatment, and training, promising improved patient outcomes and broader clinical utility.

Own Experience in the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Diagnosis of Esophageal Achalasia

Aim: to demonstrate an artificial intelligence model that optimises the differential diagnosis of achalasia.

Material and methods. The study included 75 patients: 52 % men (mean age 44.5 ± 17.8 years) and 48 % women (mean age 45.6 ± 16.6 years,) with a preliminary diagnosis of achalasia. Patients were divided into four groups: type I, II, III achalasia and a group of patients whose results did not correspond to a diagnosis of achalasia according to HRM performed based on Chicago Classification version 4.0. On the basis of a set of data from 750 swallows and therefore 6750 manometric parameters, the artificial intelligence models DecisionTreeClassifier, RandomForestClassifier and CatBoostClassifier have been trained to provide a manometric diagnosis. The comparison criteria were the training time and the f1_score metric. The technical characteristics of the model (hyperparameters) were selected using the GridSearchCV method. The model with the best results was integrated into a web application.

Results. The RandomForestClassifier was chosen as the best performing model to compare. Its technical characteristics were “decision trees” and branching depth the number of which was 14 and 5 respectively. With a maximum possible value of 1.0, these hyperparameters achieved f1_score=0.91 in 27 seconds. The web application, developed on the basis of this model, is capable of analyzing manometric data and establishing one of three types of achalasia in patients. Alternatively, it can exclude the diagnosis of achalasia. The output of an image corresponding to the diagnosis is produced for each manometric type of the disease.

Conclusions. For the first time in Russia, a machine learning model based on high-resolution esophageal manometry data was developed at the V. Kh. Vasilenko Clinic of Internal Disease Propedeutics, Gastroenterology, and Hepatology of Sechenov University. The model has been applied to the creation of a web application which has the ability to substantiate the manometry diagnosis of patients. The Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) issued a certificate of state registration of the computer program No. 2024665795 dated July 5, 2024. This artificial intelligence programme can be used in clinical practice as a medical decision support tool to optimize the process of differential diagnosis of achalasia and early detection of the disease, to determine the patient's prognosis and to select the method of further treatment.

Risk Factors Associated with Unsuccessful High-Resolution Manometry

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is used to evaluate the esophageal motor function. Unfortunately, there are times when testing cannot be performed accurately. Our study aimed to quantify the occurrence of failed HRM and identify the associated risk factors. HRM tests were retrospectively collected between September 2021 and August 2022. HRM reports that could not be interpreted based on standard HRM protocol as per Chicago guidelines were classified as failed tests. Information reviewed included testing indications, patient demographics, previous medical/symptom history, and follow-up testing for failed HRM. We then compared patients with successful vs. unsuccessful HRM based on our pre-specified factors. 152 HRM tests were performed, of which 28 tests (18%) were unsuccessful. Factors associated with failed manometry included a history of nausea/vomiting, dyspepsia, and achalasia. Patients who were unable to tolerate the probe during testing were more likely to have a history of dyspepsia (OR 20.3, p = < 0.001) and/or nausea/vomiting (OR 13.8, p = < 0.001). A history of achalasia was found to have an odds ratio of 13.2 when examining failure because of curling of the manometry catheter (p = 0.012). All seven patients who had repeat HRM with endoscopic placement were successful in obtaining diagnostic information. There are two groups that have risk factors for unsuccessful HRM testing. A history of nausea/vomiting and dyspepsia symptoms were associated with being unable to tolerate the manometry probe. The second group comprises patients with a history of achalasia in whom probe curling is more common. Future research targeting these risk factors may minimize diagnostic and treatment delays.

Quality Indicator Development for the Approach to Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Modified Delphi Study

GOALS

Develop quality indicators for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).

BACKGROUND

IEM is identified in up to 20% of patients undergoing esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) based on the Chicago Classification. The clinical significance of this pattern is not established and management remains challenging.

STUDY

Using RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methods, we employed a modified-Delphi approach for quality indicator statement development. Quality indicators were proposed based on prior literature. Experts independently and blindly scored proposed quality statements on importance, scientific acceptability, usability, and feasibility in a 3-round iterative process.

RESULTS

All 10 of the invited esophageal experts in the management of esophageal diseases invited to participate rated 12 proposed quality indicator statements. In round 1, 7 quality indicators were rated with mixed agreement, on the majority of categories. Statements were modified based on panel suggestion, modified further following round 2's virtual discussion, and in round 3 voting identified 2 quality indicators with comprehensive agreement, 4 with partial agreement, and 1 without any agreement. The panel agreed on the concept of determining if IEM is clinically relevant to the patient's presentation and managing gastroesophageal reflux disease rather than the IEM pattern; they disagreed in all 4 domains on the use of promotility agents in IEM; and had mixed agreement on the value of a finding of IEM during anti-reflux surgical planning.

CONCLUSION

Using a robust methodology, 2 IEM quality indicators were identified. These quality indicators can track performance when physicians identify this manometric pattern on HRM. This study further highlights the challenges met with IEM and the need for additional research to better understand the clinical importance of this manometric pattern.

Diagnostic delay in achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a rare disorder characterized by impaired esophageal motility and symptoms like dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. A timely diagnosis is crucial to adequately manage this condition.

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic delay from symptom onset to a definite diagnosis of achalasia, and to identify associated factors.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included patients diagnosed with achalasia between January 2013 and September 2023. Demographic data, symptoms, manometric, endoscopic, and radiological findings were collected. We also considered socio-economic deprivation. Early diagnosis was defined as occurring within 12 months of symptom onset, while late diagnosis was defined as occurring more than 12 months.

RESULTS

We included 278 patients (142 males, median age 58 years). Dysphagia was the most common symptom (96 %), followed by regurgitation (70.1 %). The median diagnostic delay was 24 months (IQR 12-72, range 0-720), with 213 patients (76.6 %) experiencing late diagnosis. Early diagnosis was more common in patients with weight loss (63.1% vs. 42.0 %, p = 0.003). Lower material deprivation correlated with shorter diagnostic delay (24 months, IQR 10-60 vs. 60 months, IQR 18-300, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Achalasia diagnosis is often delayed. Weight loss along with socio-economic factors, influence the timeliness of diagnosis. Improving awareness of disease and relevance of initial symptoms may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Diagnostic differences in high-resolution esophageal motility in a large Mexican cohort based on geographic distribution

High-resolution esophageal manometry [HRM] has become the gold standard for the evaluation of esophageal motility disorders. It is unclear whether there are HRM differences in diagnostic outcome based on regional or geographic distribution. The diagnostic outcome of HRM in a diverse geographical population of Mexico was compared and determined if there is variability in diagnostic results among referral centers. Consecutive patients referred for HRM during 2016-2020 were included. Four major referral centers in Mexico participated in the study: northeastern, southeastern, and central (Mexico City, two centers). All studies were interpreted by experienced investigators using Chicago Classification 3 and the same technology. A total of 2293 consecutive patients were included. More abnormal studies were found in the center (61.3%) versus south (45.8%) or north (45.2%) P < 0.001. Higher prevalence of achalasia was noted in the south (21.5%) versus center (12.4%) versus north (9.5%) P < 0.001. Hypercontractile disorders were more common in the north (11.0%) versus the south (5.2%) or the center (3.6%) P.001. A higher frequency of weak peristalsis occurred in the center (76.8%) versus the north (74.2%) or the south (69.2%) P < 0.033. Gastroesophageal junction obstruction was diagnosed in (7.2%) in the center versus the (5.3%) in the north and (4.2%) in the south p.141 (ns). This is the first study to address the diagnostic outcome of HRM in diverse geographical regions of Mexico. We identified several significant diagnostic differences across geographical centers. Our study provides the basis for further analysis of the causes contributing to these differences.

A prediction model of abnormal acid reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The measurement of esophageal acid exposure time (AET) using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) tests is the gold standard for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, this catheter-based 24-h test can cause considerable patient discomfort. Our aim is to identify factors affecting AET and to develop a scoring model for predicting AET abnormalities before conducting the MII-pH test.

METHODS

Of the 366 patients who underwent MII-pH test at two facilities in Japan and Vietnam, 255 patients who also had esophagogastroduodenoscopy and high-resolution manometry were included in this study. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using risk factors for AET > 6% identified from a derivation cohort (n = 109). A scoring system predicting AET > 6% was then constructed and externally validated with a separate cohort (n = 146).

RESULTS

Three variables were derived from the prediction model: male gender, Hill grades III-IV, and weak mean distal contractile integrals. Based on these scores, patients were classified into low (0 point), intermediate (1-3 points), and high (4 points) risk groups. The probabilities of having an AET > 6% were 6%, 34%, and 100% for these groups, respectively. A score of < 1 excluded patients with abnormal AET, with a negative predictive value of 93.8% in the derivation cohort and 80.0% in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

We derived and externally validated a prediction model for abnormal AET. This system could assist in guiding the appropriate treatment strategies for GERD.

Insights into the current state of knowledge, practice, and attitudes of physicians regarding gastrointestinal motility disorders in Egypt

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders are common in clinical settings, but physicians still lack sufficient understanding and effective management of these conditions.

METHODS

This research assessed Egyptian physicians' knowledge, practices, and attitudes towards GI motility disorders. A cross-sectional survey employing a self-administered questionnaire was carried out among physicians in Egypt. The questionnaire addressed various aspects of physicians' understanding, practices, and attitudes regarding GI motility disorders. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and presented as frequencies and percentages.

RESULTS

A total of 462 physicians took part in the study. Although nearly two-thirds of them knew about GI motility studies, a notable proportion lacked adequate knowledge about GI motility disorders. Notably, 84.2% correctly identified dysphagia as a critical symptom suggestive of an upper GI motility disorder. However, 13.4% incorrectly linked hematemesis with an upper GI motility disorder, and 16.7% expressed uncertainty. In terms of practice, around half of the participants encountered a small number of patients with GI motility disorders (less than 5 per week or even fewer). Only 29.7% felt confident in managing patients with motility disorders. Most participating physicians expressed a willingness to participate in training programs focused on motility disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores a knowledge gap among Egyptian physicians concerning GI motility disorders. It suggests the necessity of tailored education and training programs to improve their competency and practice in this domain.

[Esophageal Motility Disorders - What's New?]

Esophageal motor disorders are an important cause of dysphagia but can also be associated with retrosternal pain and heartburn as well as regurgitation. In extreme cases, patients are not able to eat appropriately and lose weight. Repetitive aspiration can occur and may cause pulmonological complications. Achalasia represents the most important and best-defined esophageal motor disorder and is characterized by insufficient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in combination with typical disturbances of esophageal peristalsis. Additional defined motor disorders are distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus, absent contractility and ineffective peristalsis. Patients with appropriate symptoms should primarily undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy for exclusion of e.g., tumors and esophagitis. Esophageal high-resolution manometry is the reference method for diagnosis and characterization of motor disorders in non-obstructive dysphagia. An esophagogram with barium swallow may deliver complementary information or may be used if manometry is not available. Balloon dilatation and Heller myotomy are long established and more or less equally effective therapeutic options for patients with achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) enhances the therapeutic armamentarium for achalasia and hypertensive/spastic motor disorders since 2010. For hypotensive motor disorders, which may occur as a complication of e.g., rheumatological diseases or idiopathically, therapeutic options are still limited.

Encouraging appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors: existing initiatives and proposals for the future

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have revolutionized the management of acid-related disorders, representing today the mainstay treatment of these conditions. However, despite their large range of indications and usefulness, the remarkable expansion of their use in the last two decades cannot be explained by the increasing prevalence of acid-related diseases only. An inappropriate prescription for clinical conditions in which the pathogenetic role of acid has not been documented has been described, with the natural consequence of increasing the costs and the potential risk of iatrogenic harm due to adverse events and complications recently emerged.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize current indications of PPIs administration, potential adverse events associated with their chronic utilization, and misuse of PPIs. Moreover, we describe existing and possible initiatives for improving the use of PPIs, and some proposals for the future.

EXPERT OPINION

PPI deprescribing is the preferred and most effective approach to reduce the use of PPIs, rather than adopting sharp discontinuation, probably due to fewer withdrawal symptoms. Nonetheless, large knowledge gaps still exist in clinical practice regarding the optimal approach of PPI deprescribing in various clinical scenarios. Further prospective well-designed international studies are eagerly warranted to improve our perspectives on controlling global PPI inappropriate use.

Guidewire-assisted placement of water-perfused esophageal high-resolution manometry probe when gastric insertion fails: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Blind positioning of a high-resolution manometry (HRM) probe across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is not always possible. We report our experience using guidewire-assisted water-perfused HRM probe insertion when the EGJ could not be traversed.

METHODS

Retrospective study analyzing the failure rate of EGJ insertion during HRM, and reporting a series of guidewire-assisted procedures.

KEY RESULTS

Among 2727 HRM procedures, the failure rate for traversing the EGJ was 2.7% (73 patients). The technique of guidewire-assisted placement of the HRM probe was used in 25 patients; it was well-tolerated and successful in all patients. No motility disorder was found in 6 patients. In four patients with previously diagnosed achalasia, achalasia subtype changed to type III in one patient. While a suspected motility disorder at barium esophagram and/or initial imperfect HRM tracing was confirmed in 10 patients, a new motility disorder was diagnosed in five patients using guidewire-assisted placement of the HRM probe.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

In cases of inability to traverse the EGJ, insertion of a water-perfused HRM probe using an endoscopically-placed nasogastric guidewire allows successful EGJ and esophageal peristalsis assessment. Although motility disorders are often suspected using alternative diagnostic modalities, guidewire-assisted placement of HRM may be helpful for revealing them in patients where alternative diagnostic modalities are either unavailable or inconclusive.

Towards a more precise classification of esophageal motility disorders in patients with systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic and generalized disease affecting the connective tissue of the skin and many internal organs, in particular the gastrointestinal tract. The esophagus is involved in up to 80% of the cases and represents a major cause of serious morbidities that deeply impact on the quality of life and survival of patients. Indeed, the presence of esophageal dysfunction is a good prognostic indicator in SSc, primarily due to its impact on pulmonary disease. Thus, the detection of esophageal motility alterations plays a critical role to prevent the development of both esophageal and pulmonary complications and to improve the survival of these patients. Currently, this diagnostic work-up has been limited to the use of esophageal manometry, which is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of motor physiology and pathophysiology of this organ in different clinical situations. However, in recent years, new equipments such as high-resolution (-impedance) manometry and functional luminal imaging probe have been developed and used in many esophageal clinical settings, including SSc. In this mini-review, we summarize current evidence regarding esophageal dysmotility, in the light of new data on secondary peristalsis published in this issue of the journal.

Advances on Neurogastroenterology and Motility Disorders: Pathophysiology, Diagnostics and Management

Symptoms related to abnormalities in gastrointestinal tract motility and functions are very common in the general population, affecting both pediatrics and adults, from both sexes [...].

Nasal trumpet harmoniously improves tolerance to high-resolution impedance manometry catheter placement

Background.

High-resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) is the gold-standard test to accurately diagnose esophageal dysmotility and a component of 24-hour pH testing for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Most commonly, HRiM is performed without sedation in a motility laboratory setting. Occasionally, patients are unable to complete this test due to poor tolerance, inability to traverse the nasopharynx, or inability to navigate through a hypertonic LES or large hiatal hernia. We report our two-center experience utilizing a nasopharyngeal airway (nasal trumpet) to facilitate insertion of the manometry catheter among patients who failed initial placement through the nasopharynx.

Methods.

We used size 24 French nasal trumpets in patients who had failed typical insertion of HRiM catheters during the index unsedated procedure. Topical anesthetic was applied transnasally followed by nasal trumpet insertion. The manometry catheter was introduced through the nasal trumpet, circumventing anatomical barriers to placement.

Results.

We successfully completed HRiM studies in 8 such consecutive patients. Indications for procedure included dysphagia and GERD. Each patient tolerated nasal trumpet use, and there were no complications.

Conclusion.

The addition of the nasal trumpets to the motility lab toolbox can assist with challenging motility catheter placement. This device is inexpensive, widely available, and reduces procedure failure rates due to nasopharyngeal barriers to successful placement.

Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Management Update

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequent gastrointestinal disorders. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in healing lesions and improving symptoms in most cases, although up to 40% of GERD patients do not respond adequately to PPI therapy. Refractory GERD (rGERD) is one of the most challenging problems, given its impact on the quality of life and consumption of health care resources. The definition of rGERD is a controversial topic as it has not been unequivocally established. Indeed, some patients unresponsive to PPIs who experience symptoms potentially related to GERD may not have GERD; in this case the definition could be replaced with “reflux-like PPI-refractory symptoms.” Patients with persistent reflux-like symptoms should undergo a diagnostic workup aimed at finding objective evidence of GERD through endoscopic and pH-impedance investigations. The management strategies regarding rGERD, apart from a careful check of patient's compliance with PPIs, a possible change in the timing of their administration and the choice of a PPI with a different metabolic pathway, include other pharmacologic treatments. These include histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), alginates, antacids and mucosal protective agents, potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs), prokinetics, gamma aminobutyric acid-B (GABA-B) receptor agonists and metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 (mGluR5) antagonists, and pain modulators. If there is no benefit from medical therapy, but there is objective evidence of GERD, invasive antireflux options should be evaluated after having carefully explained the risks and benefits to the patient. The most widely performed invasive antireflux option remains laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), even if other, less invasive, interventions have been suggested in the last few decades, including endoscopic transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX) or radiofrequency therapy (Stretta). Due to the different mechanisms underlying rGERD, the most effective strategy can vary, and it should be tailored to each patient. The aim of this paper is to review the different management options available to successfully deal with rGERD.