1
|
Davies C, Pescud M, Maury S, Sullivan D. A new perspective to an old problem - Mobilizing research into policy and practice using an arts and health case study. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1392146. [PMID: 38694989 PMCID: PMC11061409 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1392146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Davies
- Centre for Arts, Mental Health and Wellbeing WA, School of Allied Health and School of Humanties, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Melanie Pescud
- Centre for Arts, Mental Health and Wellbeing WA, School of Allied Health and School of Humanties, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Susan Maury
- Policy, Strategy, and Impact Group, VicHealth, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, West Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Denise Sullivan
- Chronic Disease Prevention Directorate, Public and Aboriginal Health Division, WA Department of Health, East Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ribeiro de Melo P, Baker P, Machado PP, Howse E, Slater S, Lawrence M. An analysis of the transformative potential of Australia's national food policies and policy actions to promote healthy and sustainable food systems. Public Health Nutr 2024; 27:e75. [PMID: 38374798 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980024000478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite commitment by many countries to promote food system transformation, Australia has yet to adopt a national food policy. This study aimed to evaluate Australian Federal Government's (AFG) food policies and policy actions potential to promote healthy and sustainable food systems. DESIGN This study is a desk-based policy mapping followed by a theoretically guided evaluation of policy actions. This involved three steps: (1) identification of government departments and agencies that could influence Australia's food system; (2) identification of food policies and policy actions within these departments and (3) use of a conceptual framework to evaluate policy actions' potential of changing the food system as adjust (first-order change), reform (second-order change) or transform (third-order change). SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS None. RESULTS Twenty-four food policies and sixty-two policy actions were identified across eight AFG departments and the Food Regulation System and evaluated based on the order of change they represented. Most policies were led by individual departments, reflecting the absence of a joined-up approach to food policy in Australia. Most policy actions (n 25/ 56·5 %) were evaluated as having adjust potential, whereas no transformative policy action was identified. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that Australia is likely to proceed incrementally towards achieving food system change through adjustments and reforms but lacking transformative impact. To promote transformative change, all three orders of change must be strategically implemented in a coherent and coordinated matter. A comprehensive national food policy and a national coordinating body are needed to ensure a cohesive approach to policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Phillip Baker
- The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Priscila Pereira Machado
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Scott Slater
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Mark Lawrence
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gingell T, Adhikari R, Eltahir N, Ntahomvukiye F, Pe E, Murray K, Correa-Velez I, Gallegos D. 'It is human work': qualitatively exploring community roles that facilitate cultural food security for people from refugee backgrounds. Public Health Nutr 2024; 27:e64. [PMID: 38316531 PMCID: PMC10897574 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980024000326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cultural food security is crucial for cultural health and, for people from refugee backgrounds, supports the settlement journey. Cultural communities are vital in facilitating access to cultural foods; however, it is not understood how refugee-background communities sustain cultural food security in the Australian context. This study aimed to explore key roles in refugee-background communities to understand why they were important and how they facilitate cultural food security. DESIGN Interviews were conducted by community researchers, and data analysis was undertaken using best-practice framework for collaborative data analysis. SETTING Greater Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Six interviews were conducted between August and December 2022 with people from a refugee-background community, lived in Greater Brisbane and who fulfilled a key food role in the community that facilitated access to cultural foods. RESULTS Fostering improved cultural food security supported settlement by creating connections across geographical locations and cultures and generated a sense of belonging that supported the settlement journey. Communities utilised communication methods that prioritised the knowledge, wisdom and experience of community members. It also provided community members with influence over their foodways. Community leaders had an ethos that reflected collectivist values, where community needs were important for their own health and well-being. CONCLUSIONS Communities are inherently structured and communicate in a way that allows collective agency over foodways. This agency promotes cultural food security and is suggestive of increased food sovereignty. Researchers and public health workers should work with communities and recognise community strengths. Food security interventions should target cultural food security and autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Gingell
- School of Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Childhood Nutrition Research (CCNR), Level 6, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, Qld4101, Australia
| | - Rishita Adhikari
- School of Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nehal Eltahir
- Islamic Women’s Association of Australia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Fulgence Ntahomvukiye
- School of Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Evelyn Pe
- Ethnic Communities Council of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kate Murray
- School of Psychology & Counselling, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ignacio Correa-Velez
- School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Danielle Gallegos
- School of Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Childhood Nutrition Research (CCNR), Level 6, 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, Qld4101, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sykes S, Watkins M, Bond M, Jenkins C, Wills J. What works in advocating for food advertising policy change across an english region - a realist evaluation. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1896. [PMID: 37784142 PMCID: PMC10544363 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16829-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasing recognition of the role of commercial determinants of health, local areas in England have sought to restrict the advertising of products high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) on council-owned spaces, as part of wider strategies to reduce obesity. While there is some evidence of the impact of such policy change on behaviour, little is known about what works in the process of implementing this policy change. METHODS Guided by a realist evaluation framework that explores the interaction between context, mechanism and outcomes, this study aims to investigate the factors that influence the restriction of outdoor advertising of HFSS products in one region in England. It refines a programme theory co-produced with stakeholders from 14 local authorities within a region and uses multiple data sources from each area with an in-depth examination of four case study sites. Data sources include longitudinal realist interviews, focus groups and surveys with policy advocates and policy stakeholders. Data were analysed retroductively to understand the causal link between context, mechanism and outcomes. RESULTS Outcomes were driven by five dominant mechanisms: a strategic and staggered approach to stakeholder engagement, gathering intelligence, identifying policy champions, building relationships, reframing the issue; and two secondary mechanisms of amplifying the issue and increasing public will. These led to varied outcomes with no changes in formal policy position within the evaluation period but draft policy guidance in place and changes in political will demonstrated. Dominant context factors influencing change included having a named and resourced policy advocate in place supported by an external Community of Improvement and having existing aligned local objectives. Organisational complexity and change, financial concerns, lack of local examples, ideological positions and the pandemic were also influencing contextual factors. CONCLUSION Effecting policy change in this area requires the commitment of an extended period and the valuing of short-term policy outcomes, such as increasing political will. The importance of a resourced and well-supported policy advocate to lead this work is fundamental and the commercially sensitive nature of this policy change means that a complex interplay of mechanisms is required which may be dominated by a strategically staggered approach to stakeholder engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susie Sykes
- London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, SE1 0AA, London, England.
| | - Megan Watkins
- London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, SE1 0AA, London, England
| | - Matthew Bond
- London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, SE1 0AA, London, England
| | - Catherine Jenkins
- London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, SE1 0AA, London, England
| | - Jane Wills
- London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, SE1 0AA, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sykes S, Watkins M, Wills J. Public health practitioners as policy advocates: skills, attributes and development needs. Health Promot Int 2023; 38:daad102. [PMID: 37703396 PMCID: PMC10499303 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Effecting policy change is a key strategy in tackling wider determinants of health. In England, public health sits within Local Authorities (LAs) and responsibility for ensuring health is considered across directorates increasingly falls to public health practitioners. While international professional standards expect competence in understanding policy processes, the advocacy role has been under-explored. This paper explores the professional skills, role characteristics and learning needs of practitioners advocating for the restriction of advertising high-fat, salt and sugar products in a region of England. A series of three interviews were conducted at three time points over 10 months with policy advocates leading this policy change from four LAs. Three focus groups were also held with 12 public health advocates from 10 LAs at the end of the 10-month period of data collection. Data were transcribed and analysed retroductively. Data showed that practitioners felt inexperienced as policy advocates and saw this work as different from other public health approaches. Successful advocates required interpersonal skills, knowledge of policy-making and local governance, determination, resilience, confidence, belief in their work's value and leadership. These skills were difficult to acquire through formal education, but advocacy training, mentorship and role modelling were seen as important for professional development. To successfully implement a Health in all Policies approach and address wider determinants of health, public health practitioners need to be equipped and supported as policy advocates. The advocacy role and the complex skills required need to be more fully understood by the public health profession and prioritized within workforce development at both local and national levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susie Sykes
- School of Allied and Community Health, London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK
| | - Megan Watkins
- School of Allied and Community Health, London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK
| | - Jane Wills
- School of Allied and Community Health, London South Bank University, 101 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Astbury CC, Lee KM, McGill E, Clarke J, Egan M, Halloran A, Malykh R, Rippin H, Wickramasinghe K, Penney TL. Systems Thinking and Complexity Science Methods and the Policy Process in Non-communicable Disease Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review. Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:6772. [PMID: 37579437 PMCID: PMC10125079 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the complex determinants of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the dynamic policy landscape, researchers and policymakers are exploring the use of systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policies. The aim of this review is to systematically identify and analyse existing applications of STCS-informed methods in NCD prevention policy. METHODS Systematic scoping review: We searched academic databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE) for all publications indexed by 13 October 2020, screening titles, abstracts and full texts and extracting data according to published guidelines. We summarised key data from each study, mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to policy process domains. We conducted a thematic analysis to identify advantages, limitations, barriers and facilitators to using STCS. RESULTS 4681 papers were screened and 112 papers were included in this review. The most common policy areas were tobacco control, obesity prevention and physical activity promotion. Methods applied included system dynamics modelling, agent-based modelling and concept mapping. Advantages included supporting evidence-informed decision-making; modelling complex systems and addressing multi-sectoral problems. Limitations included the abstraction of reality by STCS methods, despite aims of encompassing greater complexity. Challenges included resource-intensiveness; lack of stakeholder trust in models; and results that were too complex to be comprehensible to stakeholders. Ensuring stakeholder ownership and presenting findings in a user-friendly way facilitated STCS use. CONCLUSION This review maps the proliferating applications of STCS methods in NCD prevention policy. STCS methods have the potential to generate tailored and dynamic evidence, adding robustness to evidence-informed policymaking, but must be accessible to policy stakeholders and have strong stakeholder ownership to build consensus and change stakeholder perspectives. Evaluations of whether, and under what circumstances, STCS methods lead to more effective policies compared to conventional methods are lacking, and would enable more targeted and constructive use of these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Clifford Astbury
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kirsten M. Lee
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth McGill
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Janielle Clarke
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matt Egan
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Afton Halloran
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
- Department of Nutrition, ExercDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Regina Malykh
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Holly Rippin
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Kremlin Wickramasinghe
- World Health Organization European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Tarra L. Penney
- Global Food System & Policy Research, School of Global Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yin E, Cameron AJ, Schultz S, White CM, Vanderlee L, Hammond D, Sacks G. Public Support for Nutrition-Related Actions by Food Companies in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Findings from the 2020 International Food Policy Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:4054. [PMID: 36901060 PMCID: PMC10002083 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Unhealthy food environments contribute to unhealthy population diets. In Australia, the government currently relies on voluntary food company actions (e.g., related to front-of-pack labelling, restricting promotion of unhealthy foods, and product formulation) as part of their efforts to improve population diets, despite evidence that such voluntary approaches are less effective than mandatory policies. This study aimed to understand public perceptions of potential food industry nutrition-related actions in Australia. An online survey was completed by 4289 Australians in 2020 as part of the International Food Policy Study. The level of public support was assessed for six different nutrition-related actions related to food labelling, food promotion, and product formulation. High levels of support were observed for all six company actions, with the highest support observed for displaying the Health Star Rating on all products (80.4%) and restricting children's exposure to online promotion of unhealthy food (76.8%). Findings suggest the Australian public is strongly supportive of food companies taking action to improve nutrition and the healthiness of food environments. However, given the limitations of the voluntary action from food companies, mandatory policy action by the Australian government is likely to be needed to ensure company practices align with public expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony Yin
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia
| | - Adrian J. Cameron
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia
| | - Sally Schultz
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia
| | - Christine M. White
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Lana Vanderlee
- School of Nutrition, Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - David Hammond
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Gary Sacks
- Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lacy-Nichols J, Cullerton K. A proposal for systematic monitoring of the commercial determinants of health: a pilot study assessing the feasibility of monitoring lobbying and political donations in Australia. Global Health 2023; 19:2. [PMID: 36611039 PMCID: PMC9824991 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00900-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The commercial determinants of health include a range of practices to promote business interests, often at the expense of public health. Corporate political practices, such as lobbying and campaign donations, are used to influence policy makers and foster a political and regulatory environment conducive to business interests. Despite recognition of their public health importance, thus far there are relatively few efforts to systematically monitor commercial political practices. METHODS A pilot study was conducted to explore the feasibility of systematically monitoring two political practices - lobbying and political contributions - for 'harmful industries' (alcohol, gambling, ultra-processed food and tobacco industries) in Australia. Potential data sources were reviewed to compare data availability and detail. Two publicly available datasets were selected for the pilot: ministerial diaries for New South Wales and annual donor filings from the Australian Electoral Commission. Google Data Studio was used to analyse and visualise findings. RESULTS: The pilot study resulted in the creation of several interactive charts and dashboards that supported analysis and interrogation of the data. These charts helped to easily convey the volume of lobbying and political donations, as well as changes over time. For example, we found that between July 2014 and December 2020, NSW ministers had 20,607 meetings, of which 634 meetings were with harmful industries. And between 1998 and 2020, a total of $576,519,472 disclosed donations were made to political parties and other entities, of which $35,823,937 were from harmful industries. CONCLUSIONS Opportunities to develop a program to monitor commercial political practices face several challenges including access barriers arising from poor availability and detail of data, technical barriers arising from the format of data disclosures and coding challenges arising from the diverse nature of the commercial sector. Despite these challenges, our pilot study demonstrates the potential to implement a monitoring program and to expand its scope to other commercial determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Lacy-Nichols
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Policy, The University of Melbourne, Level 5, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Katherine Cullerton
- grid.1003.20000 0000 9320 7537School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bates S, Reeve B, Trevena H. A narrative review of online food delivery in Australia: challenges and opportunities for public health nutrition policy. Public Health Nutr 2023; 26:262-272. [PMID: 32515719 PMCID: PMC7613985 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980020000701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Online food delivery (OFD) platforms offer consumers a convenient and fast delivery service of foods and drinks sourced from foodservice partners (e.g. restaurants, quick service restaurants). There is a need to assess the impact of this emergent segment of the foodservice sector on diet and diet-related health. The aim of this narrative review was to describe the OFD sector in Australia, its use and identify potential ways to include OFD platforms in existing public health nutrition policy. DESIGN A search was conducted in peer-reviewed and grey literature. Sources were analysed and synthesised to report the characteristics of OFD platforms, delivery process, users and potential drivers of usage. The aim and scope of public health nutrition policies were analysed to identify ways of including OFD platforms. SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS General population. RESULTS There are three main operators with 9000-16 000 foodservice partners based predominantly in the main cities of Australia. OFD revenue has grown by 72 % in the last 5 years and is predicted to increase driven by usage by working adults with high disposable income who demand convenience. Current policies and initiatives aimed at manufacturers, retailers and foodservice outlets do not specifically regulate OFD platforms, although there is scope for these to be extended to such platforms. CONCLUSIONS OFD platforms are disruptors of the foodservice sector. Innovative and consistent health policy options that target the unique challenges and opportunities posed by OFD platforms are required to limit the potentially negative impact of OFD platforms on diet and diet-related health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bates
- School of Health and Related Research, Faculty of Medicine,
Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield,
SheffieldS1 4DA, England
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health,
Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney,
Sydney, New South Wales2006, Australia
| | - Belinda Reeve
- The University of Sydney Law School, University of
Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales2006, Australia
| | - Helen Trevena
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health,
Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney,
Sydney, New South Wales2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dry T, Baker P. Generating Political Commitment for Regulatory Interventions Targeting Dietary Harms and Poor Nutrition: A Case Study on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation in Australia. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:2489-2501. [PMID: 35065543 PMCID: PMC9818088 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes are an effective public health policy intervention for improving nutrition and public health. Although implemented in over 50 jurisdictions worldwide, this intervention remains vastly underutilised, and in Australia political commitment for such a tax is low. The aim of this study is to understand the politics of SSB taxation in Australia, what factors have constrained political commitment for a tax, and what might enable such commitment in future. METHODS We adopted a case study design, guided by a theoretical framework developed from the political economy of nutrition literature. Data were collected from 16 interviews with informants from multiple sectors, supported by media articles, journal articles, and grey literature. Data were coded and organized by thematic analysis, and synthesised into the final results. RESULTS Nutrition actors have made significant progress in generating commitment for a SSB tax by producing relevant evidence, raising awareness, advocating for action, employing resonating frames, collaborating with civil society organisations, and forming coalitions increasing their overall cohesion. Nevertheless, political commitment for a SSB tax is low and was found to be impeded by the powerful influence of the food, beverage, and sugar industries, opposition from both major Australian political parties, ideological resistance to regulation, a low quality monitoring and surveillance system for food and nutrition, and limited public advocacy. The influence of nutrition actors was also impeded by weak connections to key policy-makers and missed collaborative opportunities with pro-SSB tax organisations. CONCLUSION The identification of several impediments provides an explanation for why political commitment for a SSB tax is low in Australia and reveals several opportunities for how it might be generated in the future. Political commitment may come about through, for example, actions to limit the influence of industry in policy decision-making, and by strengthening the existing pro-SSB tax coalition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan Dry
- Public Health, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Phillip Baker
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, VIC, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jost S, Birringer M, Herzig C. Brokers, prestige and information exchange in the European Union’s functional food sector – A policy network analysis. J Funct Foods 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
12
|
Cullerton K, Patay D, Waller M, Adsett E, Lee A. Competing public narratives in nutrition policy: insights into the ideational barriers of public support for regulatory nutrition measures. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:86. [PMID: 35945586 PMCID: PMC9361541 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00891-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Enacting evidence-based public health policy can be challenging. One factor contributing to this challenge is a lack of public support for specific policies, which may stem from limited interest or conviction by policy arguments. This can happen when messaging strategies regarding policy do not resonate with the target group and/or policy narratives compete in public discourse. To understand how policy messaging can better resonate with a target audience, we examined the frames and narratives used by the Australian public when discussing nutrition policies. Methods We conducted 76 street intercept interviews in urban and regional settings in Queensland, Australia. Quantitative data were analysed using mean agreement scores and t-tests, and the qualitative data were analysed using an adapted qualitative narrative policy framework (QNPF). The QNPF is used to illustrate how competing narratives vary in the way they define different elements. These elements often include setting, characters, plot, policy solution and belief systems. Results Level of support for all nutrition policies was generally moderate to high, although nutrition policies perceived to be most intrusive to personal freedoms were the least popular among the public. The value of fairness was consistently invoked when participants discussed their support for or opposition to policy. Using the QNPF, two distinct settings were evident in the narratives: concern for the community or concern for self. Villains were identified as either “other individuals, in particular parents” or “Big Food”. Victims were identified as “children” or “the food industry, in particular farmers”. Frequently used plots focused on individuals making poor choices because they were uneducated, versus Big Food being powerful and controlling people and the government. Conclusions The study examined the frames and narratives used by the Australian public when discussing nutrition policies. By examining these frames and narratives, we gained insight into multiple strategies which may increase public support for certain nutrition policies in Australia. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00891-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Cullerton
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 266 Herston Rd, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
| | - Dori Patay
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 266 Herston Rd, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Michael Waller
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 266 Herston Rd, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Eloise Adsett
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 266 Herston Rd, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Amanda Lee
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 266 Herston Rd, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cicchini S, Russell C, Cullerton K. The relationship between volume of newspaper coverage and policy action for nutrition issues in Australia: a content analysis. Public Health 2022; 210:8-15. [PMID: 35863159 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Unhealthy diets are a leading risk factor for the global burden of disease. Research suggests that comprehensive, population-level solutions are required to attenuate this problem, though such policies have not been adopted. Increased media attention may lead to government-led policy action through issue definition and agenda setting. The aim of this study was to analyse which nutrition policy issues are covered in print media, and whether media attention correlated with relevant policy actions in Australia. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS A content analysis was conducted on newspaper articles published between 1999 and 2019 from 11 major Australian metropolitan newspapers. RESULTS Of the policy issues identified, few received meaningful media attention. Of those with peaks in media attention, only fortification and labelling issues coincided with government-led policy actions, while regulating junk-food advertising to children, sugar-sweetened beverage taxation, and the formulation of a National Nutrition Policy did not result in policy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Given the limited coverage of nutrition policy issues, the relationship between media attention and policy actions for the captured issues may not be determinable. In addition, factors including social, political, and historical contexts may be stronger influences on policymaking than media attention. Although this study did not demonstrate a relationship between media attention and policy action because of low coverage of nutrition issues, it did identify the media are generally reporting nutrition policy issues with a positive public health framing. Promoting favourable coverage of nutrition policy issues is still an important tool for advocacy globally. Moving forward, increasing the volume of coverage of nutrition issues should be an advocacy priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cicchini
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - C Russell
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - K Cullerton
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gaucher-Holm A, Mulligan C, L'Abbé MR, Potvin Kent M, Vanderlee L. Lobbying and nutrition policy in Canada: a quantitative descriptive study on stakeholder interactions with government officials in the context of Health Canada's Healthy Eating Strategy. Global Health 2022; 18:54. [PMID: 35619107 PMCID: PMC9137051 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00842-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The political activities of industry stakeholders must be understood to safeguard the development and implementation of effective public health policies. Methods A quantitative descriptive study was performed using data from Canada’s Registry of Lobbyists to examine the frequency and governmental target of lobbying that occurred between various types of stakeholders (i.e., industry versus non-industry) and designated public office holders (DPOH) regarding Health Canada’s Healthy Eating Strategy, from September/2016 to January/2021. Initiatives of interest were revisions to Canada’s Food Guide, changes to the nutritional quality of the food supply, front-of-pack nutrition labelling and restrictions on food marketing to children. Results The majority of registrants (88%), and corporations and organizations (90%) represented in lobbying registrations had industry ties. Industry-affiliated stakeholders were responsible for 86% of communications with DPOH, interacting more frequently with DPOH of all ranks, compared to non-industry stakeholders. Most organizations and corporations explicitly registered to lobby on the topic of marketing to children (60%), followed by Canada’s Food Guide (48%), front-of-pack nutrition labelling (44%), and the nutritional quality of the food supply (23%). The food and beverage industry, particularly the dairy industry, was the most active, accounting for the greatest number of lobbying registrations and communications, followed by the media and communication industry. Conclusions Results suggest a strategic advantage of industry stakeholders in influencing Canadian policymakers. While some safeguards have been put in place, increased transparency would allow for a better understanding of industry discourse and help protect public health interests during the policy development process. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-022-00842-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa Gaucher-Holm
- École de nutrition, Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, 2440 Bd Hochelaga, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Christine Mulligan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Mary R L'Abbé
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Monique Potvin Kent
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - Lana Vanderlee
- École de nutrition, Centre Nutrition, santé et société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, 2440 Bd Hochelaga, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
"It's All Just Marketing", a Qualitative Analysis of Consumer Perceptions and Understandings of Nutrition Content and Health Claims in New Zealand. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19063510. [PMID: 35329195 PMCID: PMC8949035 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Nutrition content and health claims are widely used globally on both food labels and in food advertising. This study explored how New Zealand consumers understand, perceive, and use nutrition content and health claims on food labels. A qualitative approach was used with semi-structured in-depth online interviews and in-person focus groups including 49 participants, aged ≥25 years responsible for household food shopping. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis using inductive coding, with development of five themes—(1) aware of claims but did not use, (2) mistrust and scepticism, (3) confusion and misinterpretation, (4) using claims to guide food choice, and (5) not all claims are equal. For theme 1, price and habit were found to be the most influential in driving food choice. Underlying theme 2 was the perception by most of nutrition and health claims as marketing. Scepticism was exacerbated when nutrient claims were displayed on inherently unhealthy products. However participants with specific dietary requirements did find claims helpful. Restricting nutrient claims to foods meeting a healthy nutrient profile aligned to the existing Health Star Rating system, education about regulation and supporting claims with more contextual information may increase trust, the perceived value of claims and therefore their utility.
Collapse
|
16
|
Russell C, Baker P, Grimes C, Lawrence MA. What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study. Public Health Nutr 2022; 25:1-18. [PMID: 35067254 PMCID: PMC9991626 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980022000234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to critically analyse Australia's current and proposed policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption. Over-consumption of added sugar is a significant public health nutrition issue. The competing interests, values and beliefs among stakeholders mean they have disparate views regarding which policy actions are preferable to reduce added sugar consumption. DESIGN Semi-structured interviews using purposive, snowball sampling and policy mapping. Policy actions were classified by two frameworks: NOURISHING (e.g. behaviour change communication, food environment and food system) and the Orders of Change (e.g. first order: technical adjustments, second order: reforming the system, third order: transforming the system). SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-two stakeholders from the food industry, food regulation, government, public health groups and academia. RESULTS All proposed and existing policy actions targeted the food environment/behaviour change; most were assessed as first-order changes, and reductionist (nutrient specific) in nature. Influences on policy actions included industry power, stakeholder fragmentation, government ideology/political will and public pressure. Few stakeholders considered potential risks of policy actions, particularly of non-nutritive sweetener substitution or opportunity costs for other policies. CONCLUSIONS Most of Australia's policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption are reductionist. Preferencing nutrient specific, first-order policy actions could reflect the influence of vested interests, a historically dominant reductionist orientation to nutrition science and policy, and the perceived difficulty of pursuing second- or third-order changes. Pursuing only first-order policy actions could lead to 'regrettable' substitutions and creates an opportunity cost for more comprehensive policy aimed at adjusting the broader food system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherie Russell
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong3220, Australia
| | - Phillip Baker
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong3220, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Carley Grimes
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong3220, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Mark Andrew Lawrence
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong3220, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wassef J, Champagne F, Farand L. Nutritionists as policy advocates: the case of obesity prevention in Quebec, Canada. Public Health Nutr 2021; 25:1-14. [PMID: 34955107 PMCID: PMC9991765 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980021004997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A core function of the public health nutrition workforce is advocacy. Little is known of the nutritionists' role in policymaking from a policy process theory perspective. The current study analyses the nutritionists' role in advocating for a six-year governmental plan on obesity prevention in Quebec, Canada. DESIGN We conducted qualitative research using Quebec's obesity policy as a case study to understand the role of nutritionists in advocating for obesity prevention policies. A conceptual framework combining the Advocacy Coalition Framework with a political analysis model based on the Theory of the Strategic Actor was developed to analyse the beliefs, interests and strategies of policy actors including nutritionists. Data sources comprised semi-structured open-ended interviews with key policy actors (n 25), including eight nutritionists (32 %) and policy-related documents (n 267). Data analysis involved thematic coding and analysis using NVivo 11 Pro. SETTING Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS Key policy actors including nutritionists. RESULTS Nutritionists formed the core of the dominant public health coalition. They advocated for an inter-sectoral governmental plan to prevent obesity through enabling environments. Their advocacy, developed through an iterative process, comprised creating a think tank and reinforcing partnerships with key policy actors, conducting research and developing evidence, communicating policy positions and advocacy materials, participating in deliberative forums and negotiating an agreement with other coalitions in the policy subsystem. CONCLUSIONS Nutritionists' advocacy influenced agenda setting and policy formulation. This research may contribute to empowering the public health nutrition workforce and strengthening its advocacy practices. It informs practitioners and researchers concerned with obesity policy and workforce development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Wassef
- University of Montreal, School of Public Health, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, C.P. 6128, Downtown campus, Montreal, QCH3C 3J7, Canada
| | - François Champagne
- University of Montreal, School of Public Health, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, C.P. 6128, Downtown campus, Montreal, QCH3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Lambert Farand
- University of Montreal, School of Public Health, Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, C.P. 6128, Downtown campus, Montreal, QCH3C 3J7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Watson WL, Pagotto A, Richmond K, Hughes C. Monitoring complaints about food marketing to children under the Australian industry Codes 2015-20: a qualitative analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health 2021; 45:562-567. [PMID: 34648220 DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the case reports of complaints regarding food marketing to children over six years and compare Australian marketing Codes to best practice recommendations. METHODS Case reports on complaints about food marketing to children under the five industry Codes - the Responsible Children's Marketing Initiative, the Quick Service Restaurant Initiative and the Australian Association of National Advertisers Code of Ethics, Code of Advertising and Marketing to Children and Food and Beverages Code - were qualitatively analysed. Reports on the Ad Standards website in the food/beverage groceries and food/beverage venues categories from 2015-2020 were investigated. The most common clauses from the Codes were identified and quotes from reports used to illustrate the determinations. Codes were compared with World Cancer Research Fund recommendations on policy to protect children. RESULTS Only 14 of 119 complaints resulted in a reported breach of industry Codes. The most common reason for dismissing complaints involved clauses requiring advertisements to be 'primarily' directed to children. The Codes did not align with best practice recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Complaints by the public show concern for food advertising to children but the Australian industry Codes fall short of addressing those concerns. Implications for public health: Government regulation is required to protect children from unhealthy food marketing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy Pagotto
- Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales
| | | | - Clare Hughes
- Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Watson WL, Sarich P, Hughes C, Dessaix A. Monitoring changes in community support for policies on obesity prevention. Aust N Z J Public Health 2021; 45:482-490. [PMID: 34411393 DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the New South Wales (NSW) community's support for obesity prevention policies and concern for food marketing and promotion issues, and to determine any demographic differences or changes over time. METHODS In 2013 (n=2474), 2016 (n=1602) and 2019 (n=1613) a sample of adults who were representative of the NSW population for age, gender, education and location was asked about support for policy initiatives that influence the food environment. Analysis identified the characteristics of those who supported policies and variation in support over time. RESULTS There were limited changes in support over time; however, support for many policies was strong and sustained. In 2019, support was highest for regulation of claims about nutrition (77.2%), and health warning labels (75.7%). Support for a ban on unhealthy food advertising that targets children (64.6%) had decreased since 2013. Women, older people and those who were aware that obesity was a risk factor for cancer were generally more likely to support policies. Parents were more likely than non-parents to be concerned about positioning unhealthy food at supermarket checkouts (OR 1.32) and unhealthy outdoor advertisements (OR 1.22). Concern increased in 2019 for unhealthy marketing on the internet (OR 1.21). CONCLUSIONS This study shows public support for policy options at moderate to high levels but not increasing in the six-year study period. Implications for public health: These results form part of a package that, along with the well-established evidence, makes the case for policy action in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Sarich
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rosewarne E, Moore M, Chislett WK, Jones A, Trieu K, Webster J. An evaluation of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership's advocacy strategy for policy change. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:100. [PMID: 34266477 PMCID: PMC8281636 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00759-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public health advocacy strategies facilitate policy change by bringing key health issues to the forefront of public and political discourse, influencing decision-makers and public opinion, and increasing policy demand. The Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership (VSRP) was established in 2014 in response to inadequate government action to improve population diets in Australia. This study aimed to evaluate the success of the VSRP's advocacy strategy in achieving policy change. METHODS Documentation of VSRP activities and outputs were collected, and semi-structured interviews conducted as part of a comprehensive process evaluation. For this study, the Kotter Plus 10-step public health advocacy evaluation framework was used to guide data extraction, analysis, and synthesis. RESULTS A sense of urgency for salt reduction was generated by producing evidence and outlining the potential impact of a state-based salt reduction programme. This enabled the creation of a coalition with diverse skills and expertise, which facilitated the development of an innovative and collaborative advocacy action plan. A clear change vision was established, but communication of the vision to decision-makers was lacking, which reduced the impact of the programme as decision-makers were not provided with a clear incentive for policy change. As a result, while programme outputs were achieved, these did not translate to achieving broader strategic goals during a limited-term intervention in a political climate unconcerned with salt. CONCLUSIONS The Kotter Plus 10-step framework was a useful tool for evaluating the success of the VSRP advocacy strategy. The framework enabled the identification of key strengths, including the creation of the guiding coalition, and areas where efforts could be improved in future similar strategies, such as effective communication within partnerships and to decision-makers, to better influence policy and improve public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emalie Rosewarne
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Michael Moore
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Wai-Kwan Chislett
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Alexandra Jones
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Kathy Trieu
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Jacqui Webster
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
How food companies use social media to influence policy debates: a framework of Australian ultra-processed food industry Twitter data. Public Health Nutr 2021; 24:3124-3135. [PMID: 33222709 PMCID: PMC9884788 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980020003353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand if, and how, Australian ultra-processed food industry actors use Twitter to influence food and health policy debates and produce a conceptual framework to describe such influence. DESIGN Twitter data of prominent industry actors were defined through purposive sampling and inductively coded to investigate possible influence on food and health policy debates. These are described using descriptive statistics and coded extracts. SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS Twitter accounts of nine prominent ultra-processed food industry actors, including major trade associations. RESULTS Ultra-processed food industry actors actively used Twitter to influence food and health policy debates. Seven overarching strategies were identified: co-opting public health narratives; opposing regulation; supporting voluntary, co- or self-regulation; engaging policy processes and decision-makers; linking regulatory environments to the need for ongoing profitability; affecting public perceptions and value judgements; and using ignorance claims to distort policy narratives. Each lobbying strategy is underpinned with tactics described throughout and captured in a framework. CONCLUSIONS The current study creates a framework to monitor how food industry actors can use social media to influence food and health policy debates. As such, social media appears to be not only an important commercial determinant of health for brand marketing, but also an extension of lobbying practices to reshape public perceptions of corporate conduct and policy-making.
Collapse
|
22
|
Friel S, Townsend B, Fisher M, Harris P, Freeman T, Baum F. Power and the people's health. Soc Sci Med 2021; 282:114173. [PMID: 34192622 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Public policy plays a central role in creating and distributing resources and conditions of daily life that matter for health equity. Policy agendas have tended to focus on health care delivery and individualised interventions. Asking why there is a lack of policy action on structural drivers of health inequities raises questions about power inequities in policy systems that maintain the status quo. In this paper we investigate the power dynamics shaping public policy and implications for health equity. Using a Health Equity Power Framework (HEPF), we examined data from 158 qualitative interviews with government, industry and civil society actors across seven policy case studies covering areas of macroeconomics, employment, social protection, welfare reform, health care, infrastructure and land use planning. The influence of structures of capitalism, neoliberalism, sexism, colonisation, racism and biomedicalism were widely evident, manifested through the ideologies, behaviours and discourses of state, market, and civil actors and the institutional spaces they occupied. Structurally less powerful public interest actors made creative use of existing or new institutional spaces, and used network, discursive and moral power to influence policy, with some success in moderating inequities in structural and institutional forms of power. Our hope is that the methodological advancement and empirical data presented here helps to illuminate how public interest actors can navigate structural power inequities in the policy system in order to disrupt the status quo and advance a comprehensive policy agenda on the social determinants of health equity. However, this analysis highlights the unrealistic expectation of turning health inequities around in a short time given the long-term embedded power dynamics and inequities within policy systems under late capitalism. Achieving health equity is a power-saturated long game.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Friel
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Fellows Road, Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Belinda Townsend
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Fellows Road, Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Matthew Fisher
- Southgate Institute for Society, Equity and Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| | - Patrick Harris
- Centre for Health Equity Training, Research & Evaluation, Australia Research Centre for Primary Health Care & Equity, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, 1871, Australia.
| | - Toby Freeman
- Southgate Institute for Society, Equity and Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| | - Fran Baum
- Southgate Institute for Society, Equity and Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rosewarne E, Chislett WK, McKenzie B, Reimers J, Jolly KA, Corben K, Trieu K, Webster J. Stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership: a qualitative study. BMC Nutr 2021; 7:12. [PMID: 33883029 PMCID: PMC8061028 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-021-00414-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interventions to reduce population salt intake are feasible and cost-effective. The Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership implemented a complex, multi-faceted salt reduction intervention between 2014 and 2020 in the Australian state of Victoria. This study aimed to understand stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Partnership and food industry stakeholders. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was adapted for the Partnership intervention and used to guide the qualitative analysis. RESULTS Fourteen Partnership and seven food industry stakeholders were interviewed. The Partnership was viewed as essential for intervention planning and decision-making and an enabler for intervention delivery. The goals of capacity building and collaborative action were perceived to have been achieved. The implementation team executed intended intervention activities and outputs, with some adaptations to strategy. Barriers and enablers to implementation were identified by interviewees, such as compatibility of individual, organisational and Partnership values and building positive relationships between the Partnership and food industry, respectively. Legal, political, social, environmental, technological and economic factors affecting intervention design, delivery and outcomes were identified. CONCLUSIONS Establishing a Partnership with diverse skills and experience facilitated collaborative action, capacity building and execution of the intervention. Monitoring and evaluating implementation informed strategy adaptations, which allowed optimisation of Partnership strategy. The importance of developing strong communication networks between strategic and implementation-levels was a key lesson.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emalie Rosewarne
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Wai-Kwan Chislett
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Briar McKenzie
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Jenny Reimers
- Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Kellie-Ann Jolly
- National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, 3008, Australia
| | - Kirstan Corben
- Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Kathy Trieu
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Jacqui Webster
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ashton B, Star C, Lawrence M, Coveney J. Voluntary food fortification policy in Australia: did 'formal' stakeholder consultation influence the outcome? Health Promot Int 2021; 36:1393-1402. [PMID: 33550375 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daab003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This research aimed to understand how the policy was represented as a 'problem' in food regulatory decision-making in Australia, and the implications for public health nutrition engagement with policy development processes. Bacchi's 'what's the problem represented to be?' discourse analysis method was applied to a case study of voluntary food fortification policy (VFP) developed by the then Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council (ANZFRMC) between 2002 and 2012. As a consultative process is a legislated aspect of food regulatory policy development in Australia, written stakeholder submissions contributed most of the key documents ascertained as relevant to the case. Four major categories of stakeholder were identified in the data; citizen, public health, government and industry. Predictably, citizen, government and public health stakeholders primarily represented voluntary food fortification (VF) as a problem of public health, while industry stakeholders represented it as a problem of commercial benefit. This reflected expected differences regarding decision-making control and power over regulatory activity. However, at both the outset and conclusion of the policy process, the ANZFRMC represented the problem of VF as commercial benefit, suggesting that in this case, a period of 'formal' stakeholder consultation did not alter the outcome. This research indicates that in VFP, the policy debate was fought and won at the initial framing of the problem in the earliest stages of the policy process. Consequently, if public health nutritionists leave their participation in the process until formal consultation stages, the opportunity to influence policy may already be lost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronwyn Ashton
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Cassandra Star
- College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Mark Lawrence
- Institue for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - John Coveney
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cullerton K, Debia S, Ferguson M, Johnston I. Towards an advocacy evaluation framework: measuring the impact of submission writing. Aust N Z J Public Health 2021; 45:4-5. [PMID: 33528046 DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sena Debia
- Public Health Association of Australia, Australian Capital Territory
| | - Megan Ferguson
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland
| | - Ingrid Johnston
- Public Health Association of Australia, Australian Capital Territory
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clarke B, Kwon J, Swinburn B, Sacks G. Understanding the dynamics of obesity prevention policy decision-making using a systems perspective: A case study of Healthy Together Victoria. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0245535. [PMID: 33481898 PMCID: PMC7822316 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite global recommendations for governments to implement a comprehensive suite of policies to address obesity, policy adoption has been deficient globally. This paper utilised political science theory and systems thinking methods to examine the dynamics underlying decisions regarding obesity prevention policy adoption within the context of the Australian state government initiative, Healthy Together Victoria (HTV) (2011-2016). The aim was to understand key influences on policy processes, and to identify potential opportunities to increase the adoption of recommended policies. METHODS Data describing government processes in relation to the adoption of six policy interventions considered as part of HTV were collected using interviews (n = 57), document analyses (n = 568) and field note observations. The data were analysed using multiple political science theories. A systematic method was then used to develop a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) for each policy intervention. A simplified meta-CLD was generated from synthesis of common elements across each of the six policy interventions. RESULTS The dynamics of policy change could be explained using a series of feedback loops. Five interconnected balancing loops served to reduce the propensity for policy change. These pertained to an organisational norm of risk aversion, and the complexity resulting from a whole-of-government policy approach and in-depth stakeholder consultation. However, seven virtuous reinforcing loops helped overcome policy resistance through policy actor capabilities that were improved over time as policy actors gained experience in advocating for change. CONCLUSION Policy processes for obesity prevention are complex and resistant to change. In order to increase adoption of recommended policies, several capabilities of policy actors, including policy skills, political astuteness, negotiation skills and consensus building, should be fostered and strengthened. Strategies to facilitate effective and broad-based consultation, both across and external to government, need to be implemented in ways that do not result in substantial delays in the policy process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brydie Clarke
- Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Janelle Kwon
- Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Boyd Swinburn
- School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gary Sacks
- Global Obesity Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cullerton K, Baker P, Adsett E, Lee A. What do the Australian public think of regulatory nutrition policies? A scoping review. Obes Rev 2021; 22:e13106. [PMID: 32748480 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Effective government policies are crucial to creating healthy food environments. However, changing public policy is a slow and challenging process involving many competing factors. One cited factor is public opinion towards a proposed policy. This study aimed to systematically explore public opinion on regulatory nutrition policy issues in Australia from 2009 to 2019, to determine whether low levels of public opinion corresponded with the low levels of regulatory policy action in this country. We found that there was varying levels of public support in Australia for public health nutrition action. Regulatory- and legislative-based policies generally had moderate to high levels of support except for food and drink taxes, which had low to moderate support. Despite high levels of public support for certain policy initiatives, national public health nutrition policy in Australia has not evolved consistently with the level of public support nor the evidence base over the past decade indicating other more important factors at play in policymaking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Cullerton
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Phillip Baker
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eloise Adsett
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda Lee
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mulligan C, Jawad A, Kent MP, Vanderlee L, L'Abbé MR. Stakeholder interactions with the federal government related to Bill S-228 and marketing to kids in Canada: a quantitative descriptive study. CMAJ Open 2021; 9:E280-E287. [PMID: 33757965 PMCID: PMC8096395 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Canadian federal restrictions on food marketing to children (children's marketing) were proposed in 2016 as Bill S-228, the Child Health Protection Act, which subsequently died on the parliamentary table. This study quantified the interactions (meetings, correspondence and lobbying) related to Bill S-228 and children's marketing by different stakeholders with the federal government. METHODS Interactions between all stakeholders and government related to children's marketing and Bill S-228 (Sept. 1, 2016-Sept. 30, 2019) were analyzed. These included the "Meetings and correspondence on healthy eating" database, detailing interactions between stakeholders and Health Canada related to nutrition policies; and Canada's Registry of Lobbyists, reporting activities of paid lobbyists. We categorized the interactions by stakeholder type (industry, nonindustry and mixed), and analyzed the number and type of interactions with different government offices. RESULTS We analyzed 139 meetings, 65 lobbying registrants, 215 lobbying registrations and 3418 communications related to children's marketing and Bill S-228. Most interactions were from industry stakeholders, including 84.2% of meetings (117/139), 81.5% of lobbying registrants (53/65), 83.3% of lobbying registrations (179/215) and 83.9% of communications (2866/3418). Most interactions (> 80%) in the highest-ranking government offices were by industry. INTERPRETATION Industry stakeholders interacted with government more often, more broadly and with higher ranking offices than nonindustry stakeholders on subjects related to children's marketing and Bill S-228. Although further research is needed to analyze the nature of the discourse around children's marketing, it is apparent that industry viewpoints were more prominent than those of nonindustry stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Mulligan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences (Mulligan, L'Abbé), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Jawad), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Potvin Kent), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; School of Nutrition (Vanderlee), Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Aalaa Jawad
- Department of Nutritional Sciences (Mulligan, L'Abbé), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Jawad), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Potvin Kent), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; School of Nutrition (Vanderlee), Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Monique Potvin Kent
- Department of Nutritional Sciences (Mulligan, L'Abbé), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Jawad), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Potvin Kent), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; School of Nutrition (Vanderlee), Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Lana Vanderlee
- Department of Nutritional Sciences (Mulligan, L'Abbé), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Jawad), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Potvin Kent), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; School of Nutrition (Vanderlee), Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Mary R L'Abbé
- Department of Nutritional Sciences (Mulligan, L'Abbé), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Public Health and Policy (Jawad), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Potvin Kent), Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; School of Nutrition (Vanderlee), Université Laval, Québec, Que.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Should botanical health claims be substantiated with evidence on traditional use? Reviewing the stakeholders’ arguments. PHARMANUTRITION 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phanu.2020.100232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
30
|
I B, Baker P, Lawrence M. Have we compromised too much? A critical analysis of nutrition policy in Australia 2007-2018. Public Health Nutr 2020; 24:1-11. [PMID: 32981565 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980020003389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A comprehensive nutrition policy containing a broad package of cross-sector and synergistic policy actions is required to attenuate the systemic drivers of poor nutrition. The current study aims to critically analyse trends in the scope of federal nutrition policy actions in Australia between 2007 and 2018 by: (1) describing the changes in nutrition policy actions, benchmarked against an international best-practice policy framework and (2) investigating how and why the scope of these policy actions have changed over time by examining the decision-making processes that led to the establishment of Australia's Healthy Food Partnership (the Partnership). DESIGN Qualitative case study involving documentary analysis and key-informant interviews. Australian federal government documents (n 10) were analysed against the NOURISHING framework. Key informants (n 6) were interviewed and asked about the Partnership's decision-making and establishment processes. SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS Executive Committee (the Partnership's governing body) and working group members. RESULTS From 2007 to 2018, the scope of Australian national nutrition policy has fluctuated from evidence-informed recommendations for a comprehensive policy to the mostly discrete policy actions of the Partnership. Themes of 'pragmatism and compromise', 'actor relationships and lobbying' and 'political context' were critical drivers for establishing the Partnership. CONCLUSION The narrowing of Australian nutrition policy reflects a response to political expediency and compromise. This political dynamic highlights a dilemma facing nutrition policy advocates: should (and if so, how) a balance be sought between the aspirational but possibly unrealistic goals, and the limited but likely deliverable outcomes during policy-making processes? These findings have relevance for developing a future comprehensive national nutrition policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon I
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood3125, Australia
| | - Phillip Baker
- Institute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood3125, Australia
| | - Mark Lawrence
- Institute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood3125, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Browne J, Coffey B, Cook K, Meiklejohn S, Palermo C. A guide to policy analysis as a research method. Health Promot Int 2020; 34:1032-1044. [PMID: 30101276 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/day052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy analysis provides a way for understanding how and why governments enact certain policies, and their effects. Public health policy research is limited and lacks theoretical underpinnings. This article aims to describe and critique different approaches to policy analysis thus providing direction for undertaking policy analysis in the field of health promotion. Through the use of an illustrative example in nutrition it aims to illustrate the different approaches. Three broad orientations to policy analysis are outlined: (i) Traditional approaches aim to identify the 'best' solution, through undertaking objective analyses of possible solutions. (ii) Mainstream approaches focus on the interaction of policy actors in policymaking. (iii) Interpretive approaches examine the framing and representation of problems and how policies reflect the social construction of 'problems'. Policy analysis may assist understanding of how and why policies to improve nutrition are enacted (or rejected) and may inform practitioners in their advocacy. As such, policy analysis provides researchers with a powerful tool to understand the use of research evidence in policymaking and generate a heightened understanding of the values, interests and political contexts underpinning policy decisions. Such methods may enable more effective advocacy for policies that can lead to improvements in health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Browne
- Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, Latrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brian Coffey
- Department of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kay Cook
- Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University, 24 Wakefield Street, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Meiklejohn
- Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claire Palermo
- Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia. Public Health Nutr 2020; 23:2041-2052. [PMID: 31948503 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980019003628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Junk-food marketing contributes significantly to childhood obesity, which in turn imposes major health and economic burdens. Despite this, political priority for addressing junk-food marketing has been weak in many countries. Competing interests, worldviews and beliefs of stakeholders involved with the issue contribute to this political inertia. An integral group of actors for driving policy change are parliamentarians, who champion policy and enact legislation. However, how parliamentarians interpret and portray (i.e. frame) the causes and solutions of public health nutrition problems is poorly understood. The present study aimed to understand how Australian parliamentarians from different political parties frame the problem of junk-food marketing. DESIGN Framing analysis of transcripts from the Australian Government's Parliamentary Hansard, involving development of a theoretical framework, data collection, coding transcripts and thematic synthesis of results. SETTINGS Australia. PARTICIPANTS None. RESULTS Parliamentarian framing generally reflected political party ideology. Liberal parliamentarians called for minimal government regulation and greater personal responsibility, reflecting the party's core values of liberalism and neoliberalism. Greens parliamentarians framed the issue as systemic, highlighting the need for government intervention and reflecting the core party value of social justice. Labor parliamentarians used both frames at varying times. CONCLUSIONS Parliamentarians' framing was generally consistent with their party ideology, though subject to changes over time. This project provides insights into the role of framing and ideology in shaping public health policy responses and may inform communication strategies for nutrition advocates. Advocates might consider using frames that resonate with the ideologies of different political parties and adapting these over time.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ken-Opurum J, Lynch K, Vandergraff D, Miller DK, Savaiano DA. A mixed-methods evaluation using effectiveness perception surveys, social network analysis, and county-level health statistics: A pilot study of eight rural Indiana community health coalitions. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2019; 77:101709. [PMID: 31568893 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Community health coalitions (CHCs) are a promising approach for addressing disparities in rural health statistics. However, their effectiveness has been variable, and evaluation methods have been insufficient and inconsistent. Thus, we propose a mixed-methods evaluation framework and discuss pilot study findings. CHCs in our pilot study partnered with Purdue Extension. Extension links communities and land grant universities, providing programming and support for community-engaged research. We conducted social network analysis and effectiveness perception surveys in CHCs in 8 rural Indiana counties during summer 2017 and accessed county-level health statistics from 2015-16. We compared calculated variables (i.e., effectiveness survey k-means clusters, network measures, health status/outcomes) using Pearson's correlations. CHC members' positive perceptions of their leadership and functioning correlated with interconnectedness in their partnership networks, while more centralized partnership networks correlated with CHC members reporting problems in their coalitions. CHCs with highly rated leadership and functioning developed in counties with poor infant/maternal health and opioid outcomes. Likewise, CHCs reporting fewer problems for participation developed in counties with poor infant/maternal health, poor opioid outcomes, and more people without healthcare coverage. This pilot study provides a framework for iterative CHC evaluation. As the evidence grows, we will make recommendations for best practices that optimize CHC partnerships to improve local health in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Ken-Opurum
- Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| | - Krystal Lynch
- Purdue Nutrition Education Program, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | | | | | - Dennis A Savaiano
- Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Baker P, Brown AD, Wingrove K, Allender S, Walls H, Cullerton K, Lee A, Demaio A, Lawrence M. Generating political commitment for ending malnutrition in all its forms: A system dynamics approach for strengthening nutrition actor networks. Obes Rev 2019; 20 Suppl 2:30-44. [PMID: 31245905 DOI: 10.1111/obr.12871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Generating political commitment for ending all forms of malnutrition represents a key challenge for the global nutrition community. Without commitment, the policies, programs, and resources needed to improve nutrition are unlikely to be adopted, effectively implemented, nor sustained. One essential driver of commitment is nutrition actor network (NAN) effectiveness, the web of individuals and organizations operating within a given country who share a common interest in improving nutrition and who act collectively to do so. To inform new thinking and action towards strengthening NAN effectiveness, we use a systems dynamics theoretical approach and literature review to build initial causal loop diagrams (CLDs) of political commitment and NAN effectiveness and a qualitative group model building (GMB) method involving an expert workshop to strengthen model validity. First, a "nutrition commitment system" CLD demonstrates how five interrelated forms of commitment-rhetorical, institutional, operational, embedded, and system-wide-can dynamically reinforce or diminish one another over time. Second, we present CLDs demonstrating factors shaping NAN effectiveness organized into three categories: actor features, resources, and capacities; framing strategies, evidence, and norms; and institutional, political, and societal contexts. Together, these models generate hypotheses on how political commitment and NAN effectiveness could be strengthened in future and may provide potential starting points for country-specific conversations for doing so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip Baker
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Andrew D Brown
- Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Kate Wingrove
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Steve Allender
- Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Helen Walls
- Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Amanda Lee
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Mark Lawrence
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The Impact of Voluntary Policies on Parents' Ability to Select Healthy Foods in Supermarkets: A Qualitative Study of Australian Parental Views. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16183377. [PMID: 31547350 PMCID: PMC6765896 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16183377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Food packaging is used for marketing purposes, providing consumers with information about product attributes at the point-of-sale and thus influencing food choice. The Australian government focuses on voluntary policies to address inappropriate food marketing, including the Health Star Rating nutrition label. This research explored the way marketing via packaging information influences Australian parents’ ability to select healthy foods for their children, and who parents believe should be responsible for helping them. Five 90-min focus groups were conducted by an experienced facilitator in Perth, Western Australia. Four fathers and 33 mothers of children aged 2–8 years participated. Group discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and inductive thematic content analysis conducted using NVivo11. Seven themes were derived: (1) pressure of meeting multiple demands; (2) desire to speed up shopping; (3) feeding them well versus keeping them happy; (4) lack of certainty in packaging information; (5) government is trusted and should take charge; (6) food manufacturers’ health messages are not trusted; (7) supermarkets should assist parents to select healthy foods. Food packaging information appears to be contributing to parents’ uncertainty regarding healthy food choices. Supermarkets could respond to parents’ trust in them by implementing structural policies, providing shopping environments that support and encourage healthy food choices.
Collapse
|
36
|
Doctors Rule: An Analysis of Health Ministers' Diaries in Australia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16132440. [PMID: 31323982 PMCID: PMC6650919 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16132440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Limited progress in nutrition policy action is often blamed on the close relationships the food industry has with health policy decision-makers. This analysis sought to examine this belief through the analysis of health ministers' diaries. Entries were downloaded from health ministers' diaries from two states in Australia from January 2013 to June 2018. Entries were coded according to which interest group met with the minister or whether general parliamentary business was undertaken. Coding was also undertaken for any meeting topics related to nutrition policy. Analysis of health ministers' diaries found that the food industry has limited documented interaction with the two state health ministers in Australia. Instead, medical associations, private hospitals and health services, and sporting associations (rugby league associations) had the most interactions with health ministers. Poor representation was seen on nutrition issues, and there was an apparent lack of nutrition advocates interacting with the health ministers. There are opportunities for nutrition advocates to increase their level of interaction with state health ministers. This could include building alliances with medical associations, as they are in a powerful position, to advocate directly to health ministers. Health ministers' diaries can provide valuable insights into who is meeting officially with ministers. However, there are also limitations with the dataset.
Collapse
|
37
|
Buckton CH, Fergie G, Leifeld P, Hilton S. A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the "sugar tax" debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:490. [PMID: 31046718 PMCID: PMC6498658 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6799-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND On 6th April 2018, the UK Government introduced the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) as a mechanism designed to address increasing prevalence of obesity and associated ill health by reducing sugar consumption. Given that the successful introduction of upstream food and nutrition policies is a highly political enterprise involving multiple interested parties, understanding the complex network of stakeholders seeking to influence such policy decisions is imperative. METHODS Media content analysis was used to build a dataset of relevant newspaper articles, which were analysed to identify stakeholder agreement or disagreement with defined concept statements. We used discourse network analysis to produce visual representations of the network of stakeholders and coalitions evident in the debate as it was presented in UK newspapers, in the lead up to and following the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy in the UK, from May 2015 to November 2016. RESULTS Coding identified 3883 statements made by 214 individuals from 176 organisations, relating to 47 concepts. Network visualisations revealed a complex network of stakeholders with clear sceptical and supportive coalitions. Industry stakeholders appeared less united in the network than anticipated, particularly before the SDIL announcement. Some key industry actors appeared in the supportive coalition, possibly due to the use of corporate social responsibility rhetoric. Jamie Oliver appeared as a dominant stakeholder, firmly embedded with public health advocates. CONCLUSION This study highlights the complexity of the network of stakeholders involved in the public debate on food policies such as sugar tax and the SDIL. Polarisation of stakeholders arose from differences in ideology, focus on a specific policy and statements about the weight of evidence. Vocal celebrity policy entrepreneurs may be instrumental in gaining public and policy makers' support for future upstream regulation to promote population health, to facilitate alignment around a clear ideology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina H. Buckton
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX UK
| | - Gillian Fergie
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX UK
| | - Philip Leifeld
- Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester Campus, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK
- School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK
| | - Shona Hilton
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3AX UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pulker CE, Trapp GSA, Scott JA, Pollard CM. The Nature and Quality of Australian Supermarkets' Policies that can Impact Public Health Nutrition, and Evidence of their Practical Application: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2019; 11:nu11040853. [PMID: 30991733 PMCID: PMC6520865 DOI: 10.3390/nu11040853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Improving population diets is a public health priority, and calls have been made for corporations such as supermarkets to contribute. Supermarkets hold a powerful position within the food system, and one source of power is supermarket own brand foods (SOBFs). Many of the world’s largest supermarkets have corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies that can impact public health, but little is known about their quality or practical application. This study examines the nature and quality of Australian supermarkets’ CSR policies that can impact public health nutrition, and provides evidence of practical applications for SOBFs. A content analysis of CSR policies was conducted. Evidence of supermarkets putting CSR policies into practice was derived from observational audits of 3940 SOBFs in three large exemplar supermarkets (Coles, Woolworths, IGA) in Perth, Western Australia (WA). All supermarkets had some CSR policies that could impact public health nutrition; however, over half related to sustainability, and many lacked specificity. All supermarkets sold some nutritious SOBFs, using marketing techniques that made them visible. Findings suggest Australian supermarket CSR policies are not likely to adequately contribute to improving population diets or sustainability of food systems. Setting robust and meaningful targets, and improving transparency and specificity of CSR policies, would improve the nature and quality of supermarket CSR policies and increase the likelihood of a public health benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Elizabeth Pulker
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Georgina S A Trapp
- Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, PO Box 855, West Perth 6872, Western Australia, Australia.
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Jane Anne Scott
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Christina Mary Pollard
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Positioning food standards programmes to protect public health: current performance, future opportunities and necessary reforms. Public Health Nutr 2019; 22:912-926. [PMID: 30816085 PMCID: PMC6521792 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980018003786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess current performance and identify opportunities and reforms necessary for positioning a food standards programme to help protect public health against dietary risk factors. DESIGN A case study design in which a food standards programme's public health protection performance was analysed against an adapted Donabedian model for assessing health-care quality. The criteria were the food standards programme's structure (governance arrangements and membership of its decision-making committees), process (decision-making tools, public engagement and transparency) and food standards outcomes, which provided the information base on which performance quality was inferred. SETTING The Australia and New Zealand food standards programme.ParticipantsThe structure, process and outcomes of the Programme. RESULTS The Programme's structure and processes produce food standards outcomes that perform well in protecting public health from risks associated with nutrient intake excess or inadequacy. The Programme performs less well in protecting public health from the proliferation and marketing of 'discretionary' foods that can exacerbate dietary risks. Opportunities to set food standards to help protect public health against dietary risks are identified. CONCLUSIONS The structures and decision-making processes used in food standards programmes need to be reformed so they are fit for purpose for helping combat dietary risks caused by dietary excess and imbalances. Priorities include reforming the risk analysis framework, including the nutrient profiling scoring criterion, by extending their nutrition science orientation from a nutrient (reductionist) paradigm to be more inclusive of a food/diet (holistic) paradigm.
Collapse
|
40
|
Who Are the Key Players Involved with Shaping Public Opinion and Policies on Obesity and Diabetes in New Zealand? Nutrients 2018; 10:nu10111592. [PMID: 30380721 PMCID: PMC6267561 DOI: 10.3390/nu10111592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an urgent need for strategic approaches to address the high prevalence of obesity and diabetes in New Zealand. Such approaches rely strongly on input from multiple actors in the diabetes and obesity policy space. We conducted a social network analysis to identify influential actors involved with shaping public opinion and/or policy regarding obesity and diabetes in New Zealand. Our analysis revealed a diverse network of 272 individuals deemed influential by their peers. These individuals represented nine professional categories, particularly academics (34%), health service providers (22%), and government representatives (17%). The network included a total of 17 identified decision-makers. Relative capacity of professional categories to access these decision-makers was highest for representatives of the food and beverage industry (25%), compared with nongovernment organisations (9%) or academics (7%). We identified six distinct brokers, in academic (n = 4), government (n = 1), and nongovernmental (n = 1) positions, who could play a key role in improving communication and networking activities among all interest groups. Such actions should ultimately establish effective networks to foster evidence-based policy development to prevent and reduce the burden of diabetes and obesity.
Collapse
|
41
|
Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2018; 15:83. [PMID: 30170610 PMCID: PMC6119246 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0716-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Influencing public policy change can be difficult and complex, particularly for those with limited power and resources. For any one issue there may be several groups, including the commercial sector and public health advocates advocating from different policy perspectives. However, much of the public health advocacy literature and tools available for those wanting to improve their practice is based on research from one specific perspective of an issue. This approach deprives advocates of potential insight into the most effective levers for this complex and difficult process. To provide a more comprehensive insight into effective levers for influencing public health policy change, a conceptual model for poorly-resourced advocates was developed. The model was developed through the integration and synthesis of policy process and network theories with the results from three studies conducted previously by the authors: a systematic literature review; a social network analysis of influential actors in Australian nutrition policy; plus in-depth interviews with a sample of these actors who had diverse perspectives on influencing nutrition policy. Through understanding the key steps in this model advocates will be better equipped to increase political and public will, and affect positive policy change.
Collapse
|
42
|
Pulker CE, Trapp GSA, Scott JA, Pollard CM. What are the position and power of supermarkets in the Australian food system, and the implications for public health? A systematic scoping review. Obes Rev 2018; 19:198-218. [PMID: 29193744 DOI: 10.1111/obr.12635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Supermarkets have been described as having unprecedented and disproportionate power in the food system. This scoping review synthesized the literature that describes the position and power of supermarkets in the Australian food system, and the implications for public health. A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature identified 68 documents that described supermarket power. Implications for public health were also recorded. Data revealed that supermarkets hold a powerful position in the Australian food system, acting as the primary gatekeepers. Supermarkets have obtained instrumental, structural and discursive power from many sources that overlap and reinforce each other. Few positive public health impacts of supermarket power were identified, providing many opportunities for improvement in the domains of food governance, the food system and public health nutrition. There is very little public health research examining the impact of supermarket power in Australia. More research is needed, and examination of supermarket own brands is of particular importance owing to their pivotal role as a source of power and their potential to improve public health outcomes, such as obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Pulker
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - G S A Trapp
- Telethon Kids Institute, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.,Centre for the Built Environment and Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - J A Scott
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - C M Pollard
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Health in Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hernández-Aguado I, Chilet-Rosell E. Pathways of undue influence in health policy-making: a main actor's perspective. J Epidemiol Community Health 2017; 72:154-159. [PMID: 29079588 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2017-209677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 10/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is crucial to know the extent to which influences lead to policy capture-by which the policy-making process is shifted away from the public interest towards narrow private interests. Using the case study of Spain, our aim was to identify interactions between public administration, civil society and private companies that could influence health policies. METHODS 54 semistructured interviews with key actors related to health policy. The interviews were used to gather information on main policy actors as well as on direct and subtle influences that could modify health policies. The analysis identified and described, from the interviewed persons' experiences, both the inappropriate influences exerted on the actors and those that they exerted. RESULTS Inappropriate influences were identified at all levels of administration and policy. They included actions for personal benefits, pressure for blocking health policies and pressure from high levels of government in favour of private corporations. The private sector played a significant role in these strategies through bribery, personal gifts, revolving doors, negative campaigns and by blocking unfavourable political positions or determining the knowledge agenda. The interviewees reported subtle forms of influence (social events, offers of technical support, invitations, etc) that contributed to the intellectual and cultural capture of health officials. CONCLUSION The health policy decision-making processes in Spain are subject to influences by stakeholders that determine a degree of policy capture, which is avoidable. The private sector uses different strategies, from subtle influences to outright corruption, taking advantage in many cases of flexible legislation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado
- Department of Public Health, History of Science and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University Miguel Hernández, Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), San Juan de Alicante, Spain
| | - Elisa Chilet-Rosell
- Department of Public Health, History of Science and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University Miguel Hernández, Ciber de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), San Juan de Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Joining the dots: the role of brokers in nutrition policy in Australia. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:307. [PMID: 28390418 PMCID: PMC5385063 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4217-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Poor diet is the leading preventable risk factor contributing to the burden of disease in Australia. A range of cost-effective, comprehensive population-focussed strategies are available to address these dietary-related diseases. However, despite evidence of their effectiveness, minimal federal resources are directed to this area. To better understand the limited public health nutrition policy action in Australia, we sought to identify the key policy brokers in the Australian nutrition policy network and consider their level of influence over nutrition policymaking. Methods A social network analysis involving four rounds of data collection was undertaken using a modified reputational snowball method to identify the nutrition policy network of individuals in direct contact with each other. Centrality measures, in particular betweenness centrality, and a visualisation of the network were used to identify key policy brokers. Results Three hundred and ninety (390) individual actors with 1917 direct ties were identified within the Australian nutrition policy network. The network revealed two key brokers; a Nutrition Academic and a General Health professional from a non-government organisation (NGO), with the latter being in the greatest strategic position for influencing policymakers. Conclusion The results of this social network analysis illustrate there are two dominant brokers within the nutrition policy network in Australia. However their structural position in the network means their brokerage roles have different purposes and different levels of influence on policymaking. The results suggest that brokerage in isolation may not adequately represent influence in nutrition policy in Australia. Other factors, such as direct access to decision–makers and the saliency of the solution, must also be considered. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4217-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Cullerton
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
| | - Timothy Donnet
- School of Management, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Amanda Lee
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia
| | - Danielle Gallegos
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia
| |
Collapse
|