Scleral lens wear following penetrating keratoplasty: changes in corneal curvature and optics

Prescription Habits of Scleral Lenses for the Management of Corneal Irregularity and Ocular Surface Disease Among Scleral Lens Practitioners

OBJECTIVES

To describe prescribing patterns of therapeutic scleral lenses (SLs) in the management of corneal irregularity and ocular surface disease among practitioners who prescribe SLs.

METHODS

Participants ranked treatment options for corneal irregularity and ocular surface disease in the order they would generally consider using them in an electronic survey. Median rank score for each option is reported, along with the percentage of participants assigning first place ranking to each option. The percentage of participants assigning first, second, or third place ranking to each option is also reported.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and seventy-eight practitioners participated. Scleral lenses are most frequently considered as the first choice for the management of corneal irregularity based on overall median rank, followed by corneal rigid lenses (rigid gas-permeable [RGPs]). Scleral lenses were the first choice of 42% of participants, followed by RGPs (20%). For ocular surface disease, lubricant drops are most frequently used first, followed by meibomian gland expression, topical cyclosporine or lifitegrast, topical steroids, punctal plugs, and SLs, respectively. Lubricant drops were the first therapeutic option considered for ocular surface disease by 63% of participants and 45% ranked SLs as their sixth, seventh or eighth treatment based on median overall rank.

CONCLUSIONS

Scleral lenses were identified as the first option for management of corneal irregularity more frequently than RGPs. Scleral lenses are considered for management of ocular surface disease before surgical intervention but after meibomian gland expression, punctal occlusion, and topical medical therapy are attempted.

Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Scleral Lens Wear in Penetrating Keratoplasty and Keratoconus

OBJECTIVE

To compare corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in keratoconus and penetrating keratoplasty eyes before and after nonfenestrated scleral lens wear.

METHODS

Twenty-three participants were enrolled, and 37 eyes were included in the analysis (11 penetrating keratoplasty and 26 keratoconus). A range of corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP were measured using the CORVIS ST before and after 8 hr of nonfenestrated scleral lens wear (Keracare, Acculens, Denver, CO).

RESULTS

Before lens wear, penetrating keratoplasty eyes displayed significantly greater median values for central corneal thickness (97 μm thicker, P=0.02), IOP (3.89 mm Hg higher, P=0.01), and biomechanical parameter A2 length (0.48 mm longer, P=0.003) compared with keratoconic eyes. No significant changes in corneal biomechanical parameters or IOP were observed after scleral lens wear in either group (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although nonfenestrated scleral contact lenses can induce a subatmospheric pressure after lens settling and compress tissue surrounding the limbus, no significant changes were detected in the corneal biomechanical parameters studied using CORVIS ST after scleral lens wear in eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and keratoconus.

Keratoconus: An updated review

Keratoconus is a bilateral and asymmetric disease which results in progressive thinning and steeping of the cornea leading to irregular astigmatism and decreased visual acuity. Traditionally, the condition has been described as a noninflammatory disease; however, more recently it has been associated with ocular inflammation. Keratoconus normally develops in the second and third decades of life and progresses until the fourth decade. The condition affects all ethnicities and both sexes. The prevalence and incidence rates of keratoconus have been estimated to be between 0.2 and 4,790 per 100,000 persons and 1.5 and 25 cases per 100,000 persons/year, respectively, with highest rates typically occurring in 20- to 30-year-olds and Middle Eastern and Asian ethnicities. Progressive stromal thinning, rupture of the anterior limiting membrane, and subsequent ectasia of the central/paracentral cornea are the most commonly observed histopathological findings. A family history of keratoconus, eye rubbing, eczema, asthma, and allergy are risk factors for developing keratoconus. Detecting keratoconus in its earliest stages remains a challenge. Corneal topography is the primary diagnostic tool for keratoconus detection. In incipient cases, however, the use of a single parameter to diagnose keratoconus is insufficient, and in addition to corneal topography, corneal pachymetry and higher order aberration data are now commonly used. Keratoconus severity and progression may be classified based on morphological features and disease evolution, ocular signs, and index-based systems. Keratoconus treatment varies depending on disease severity and progression. Mild cases are typically treated with spectacles, moderate cases with contact lenses, while severe cases that cannot be managed with scleral contact lenses may require corneal surgery. Mild to moderate cases of progressive keratoconus may also be treated surgically, most commonly with corneal cross-linking. This article provides an updated review on the definition, epidemiology, histopathology, aetiology and pathogenesis, clinical features, detection, classification, and management and treatment strategies for keratoconus.

[Optical properties of the cornea after different modifications of penetrating keratoplasty]

PURPOSE

Comparative analysis of optical properties of the cornea after different modifications of penetrating keratoplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 56 patients (56 eyes) divided into three study groups according to the surgery technique. Group I included 17 patients (17 eyes) after one-piece mushroom keratoplasty, group II - 21 patients (21 eyes) after two-piece mushroom keratoplasty and group III - 18 patients (18 eyes) after penetrating keratoplasty. In addition to standard examination methods, before surgery and in the course of the follow-up all patients underwent software-powered corneal densitometry on the anterior segment analyzer (Pentacam HR, "Oculus", Germany), as well as an assessment of the degree and regularity of postoperative astigmatism.

RESULTS

Comparison of the obtained results revealed with a high degree of confidence higher values of the total specific light scattering after two-piece mushroom keratoplasty throughout the entire observation period (p<0.05). At the same time, there was no statistically significant difference in visual acuity between the three study groups (p>0.05). A statistically significant increase in the level of induced astigmatism was revealed after penetrating keratoplasty.

CONCLUSION

The observed increase in light scattering after two-piece mushroom keratoplasty does not lead to a decrease in visual acuity. The interface in the optical zone of the cornea formed by a microkeratome does not affect the degree and regularity of induced astigmatism.

Scleral Lens-Induced Corneal Edema After Radial Keratotomy

ABSTRACT

This case series examines the magnitude and regional variation in scleral lens-induced corneal edema in postradial keratotomy (RK) eyes. Scheimpflug imaging was used to measure corneal thickness across the central 6 mm before and after scleral lens wear in nine post-RK eyes (median age 64 years). Variations in corneal edema were examined as a function of distance from the corneal center (six 0.5-mm annuli) and from 0° to 360°. The median central corneal edema was 2.19% (interquartile range 1.03%-3.18%; P=0.02) and increased in magnitude and variability further from the central cornea (from 1.30% in the central 0-0.5 mm to 3.12% in the 2.5-3.0 mm midperiphery) (P=0.02). Scleral lens-induced corneal edema in post-RK eyes was greater in magnitude further from the corneal center and at the approximate location of corneal incisions.

CLEAR - Scleral lenses

Scleral lenses were the first type of contact lens, developed in the late nineteenth century to restore vision and protect the ocular surface. With the advent of rigid corneal lenses in the middle of the twentieth century and soft lenses in the 1970's, the use of scleral lenses diminished; in recent times there has been a resurgence in their use driven by advances in manufacturing and ocular imaging technology. Scleral lenses are often the only viable form of contact lens wear across a range of clinical indications and can potentially delay the need for corneal surgery. This report provides a brief historical review of scleral lenses and a detailed account of contemporary scleral lens practice including common indications and recommended terminology. Recent research on ocular surface shape is presented, in addition to a comprehensive account of modern scleral lens fitting and on-eye evaluation. A range of optical and physiological challenges associated with scleral lenses are presented, including options for the clinical management of a range of ocular conditions. Future applications which take advantage of the stability of scleral lenses are also discussed. In summary, this report presents evidence-based recommendations to optimise patient outcomes in modern scleral lens practice.