1
|
Bateman IJ, Anderson K, Argles A, Belcher C, Betts RA, Binner A, Brazier RE, Cho FHT, Collins RM, Day BH, Duran‐Rojas C, Eisenbarth S, Gannon K, Gatis N, Groom B, Hails R, Harper AB, Harwood A, Hastings A, Heard MS, Hill TC, Inman A, Lee CF, Luscombe DJ, MacKenzie AR, Mancini MC, Morison JIL, Morris A, Quine CP, Snowdon P, Tyler CR, Vanguelova EI, Wilkinson M, Williamson D, Xenakis G. A review of planting principles to identify the right place for the right tree for ‘net zero plus’ woodlands: Applying a place‐based natural capital framework for sustainable, efficient and equitable (
SEE
) decisions. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J. Bateman
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Karen Anderson
- Environment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter, Penryn Campus Cornwall UK
| | - Arthur Argles
- College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Claire Belcher
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Richard A. Betts
- University of Exeter Global Systems Institute Exeter UK
- Met Office Hadley Centre Exeter UK
| | - Amy Binner
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Richard E. Brazier
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Frankie H. T. Cho
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Rebecca M. Collins
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Brett H. Day
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Carolina Duran‐Rojas
- College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Sabrina Eisenbarth
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Kate Gannon
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Naomi Gatis
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Ben Groom
- Dragon Capital Chair in Biodiversity Economics, Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | | | - Anna B. Harper
- College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Amii Harwood
- Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK
| | - Astley Hastings
- Institute of Biological and Environmental Science University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK
| | | | - Timothy C. Hill
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Alex Inman
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - Christopher F. Lee
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | - David J. Luscombe
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Angus R. MacKenzie
- Director, Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
| | - Mattia C. Mancini
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute (LEEP), Department of Economics University of Exeter Business School Exeter UK
| | | | - Aaron Morris
- Forest Research, Northern Research Station Roslin UK
| | | | - Pat Snowdon
- Head of Economics and Woodland Carbon Code, Scottish Forestry Edinburgh UK
| | - Charles R. Tyler
- Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | | | | | - Daniel Williamson
- College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith P, Arneth A, Barnes DKA, Ichii K, Marquet PA, Popp A, Pörtner HO, Rogers AD, Scholes RJ, Strassburg B, Wu J, Ngo H. How do we best synergize climate mitigation actions to co-benefit biodiversity? GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2022; 28:2555-2577. [PMID: 34951743 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
A multitude of actions to protect, sustainably manage and restore natural and modified ecosystems can have co-benefits for both climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation. Reducing greenhouse emissions to limit warming to less than 1.5 or 2°C above preindustrial levels, as outlined in the Paris Agreement, can yield strong co-benefits for land, freshwater and marine biodiversity and reduce amplifying climate feedbacks from ecosystem changes. Not all climate mitigation strategies are equally effective at producing biodiversity co-benefits, some in fact are counterproductive. Moreover, social implications are often overlooked within the climate-biodiversity nexus. Protecting biodiverse and carbon-rich natural environments, ecological restoration of potentially biodiverse and carbon-rich habitats, the deliberate creation of novel habitats, taking into consideration a locally adapted and meaningful (i.e. full consequences considered) mix of these measures, can result in the most robust win-win solutions. These can be further enhanced by avoidance of narrow goals, taking long-term views and minimizing further losses of intact ecosystems. In this review paper, we first discuss various climate mitigation actions that evidence demonstrates can negatively impact biodiversity, resulting in unseen and unintended negative consequences. We then examine climate mitigation actions that co-deliver biodiversity and societal benefits. We give examples of these win-win solutions, categorized as 'protect, restore, manage and create', in different regions of the world that could be expanded, upscaled and used for further innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pete Smith
- Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Almut Arneth
- Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | | | - Kazuhito Ichii
- Center for Environmental Remote Sensing (CeRES), Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Pablo A Marquet
- Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alexander Popp
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany
| | - Hans-Otto Pörtner
- Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Alex D Rogers
- Somerville College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- REV Ocean, Lysaker, Norway
| | - Robert J Scholes
- Global Change Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Bernardo Strassburg
- Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre, Department of Geography and Environment, Pontifical Catholic University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Jianguo Wu
- The Institute of Environmental Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hien Ngo
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Systemic acquired resistance networks amplify airborne defense cues. Nat Commun 2019; 10:3813. [PMID: 31444353 PMCID: PMC6707303 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11798-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Salicylic acid (SA)-mediated innate immune responses are activated in plants perceiving volatile monoterpenes. Here, we show that monoterpene-associated responses are propagated in feed-forward loops involving the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) signaling components pipecolic acid, glycerol-3-phosphate, and LEGUME LECTIN-LIKE PROTEIN1 (LLP1). In this cascade, LLP1 forms a key regulatory unit in both within-plant and between-plant propagation of immunity. The data integrate molecular components of SAR into systemic signaling networks that are separate from conventional, SA-associated innate immune mechanisms. These networks are central to plant-to-plant propagation of immunity, potentially raising SAR to the population level. In this process, monoterpenes act as microbe-inducible plant volatiles, which as part of plant-derived volatile blends have the potential to promote the generation of a wave of innate immune signaling within canopies or plant stands. Hence, plant-to-plant propagation of SAR holds significant potential to fortify future durable crop protection strategies following a single volatile trigger. Plants immune responses are triggered upon perception of volatile monoterpenes. Here, Wenig et al. show that a feed-forward loop featuring LEGUME LECTIN-LIKE PROTEIN1 propagates monoterpene-associated cues both within and between plants, illustrating how systemic immunity could act at a population level.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Isoprene is a climate-active gas, produced in huge amounts by trees, yet we know little about its biogeochemical cycle. Bacteria able to grow on isoprene have been isolated from soils and sediments, but the phyllosphere, the principal isoprene source, has remained unexplored. Using targeted cultivation-independent techniques, we show that the phyllosphere of an isoprene-emitting tree contains a diverse and active isoprene-degrading population. We reconstruct the genome of an isoprene-degrading Variovorax strain and show that it contains a functional isoprene monooxygenase. This detailed study targets isoprene degraders from the phyllosphere, applies metaomics to isoprene degradation, and isolates and sequences an isoprene-degrading member of the Proteobacteria. The climate-active gas isoprene (2-methyl-1,3-butadiene) is released to the atmosphere in huge quantities, almost equaling that of methane, yet we know little about the biological cycling of isoprene in the environment. Although bacteria capable of growth on isoprene as the sole source of carbon and energy have previously been isolated from soils and sediments, no microbiological studies have targeted the major source of isoprene and examined the phyllosphere of isoprene-emitting trees for the presence of degraders of this abundant carbon source. Here, we identified isoprene-degrading bacteria in poplar tree-derived microcosms by DNA stable isotope probing. The genomes of isoprene-degrading taxa were reconstructed, putative isoprene metabolic genes were identified, and isoprene-related gene transcription was analyzed by shotgun metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Gram-positive bacteria of the genus Rhodococcus proved to be the dominant isoprene degraders, as previously found in soil. However, a wider diversity of isoprene utilizers was also revealed, notably Variovorax, a genus not previously associated with this trait. This finding was confirmed by expression of the isoprene monooxygenase from Variovorax in a heterologous host. A Variovorax strain that could grow on isoprene as the sole carbon and energy source was isolated. Analysis of its genome confirmed that it contained isoprene metabolic genes with an identical layout and high similarity to those identified by DNA-stable isotope probing and metagenomics. This study provides evidence of a wide diversity of isoprene-degrading bacteria in the isoprene-emitting tree phyllosphere and greatly enhances our understanding of the biodegradation of this important metabolite and climate-active gas.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu B, Jarosch AM, Gauder M, Graeff-Hönninger S, Schnitzler JP, Grote R, Rennenberg H, Kreuzwieser J. VOC emissions and carbon balance of two bioenergy plantations in response to nitrogen fertilization: A comparison of Miscanthus and Salix. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2018; 237:205-217. [PMID: 29486454 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Energy crops are an important renewable source for energy production in future. To ensure high yields of crops, N fertilization is a common practice. However, knowledge on environmental impacts of bioenergy plantations, particularly in systems involving trees, and the effects of N fertilization is scarce. We studied the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC), which negatively affect the environment by contributing to tropospheric ozone and aerosols formation, from Miscanthus and willow plantations. Particularly, we aimed at quantifying the effect of N fertilization on VOC emission. For this purpose, we determined plant traits, photosynthetic gas exchange and VOC emission rates of the two systems as affected by N fertilization (0 and 80 kg ha-1 yr-1). Additionally, we used a modelling approach to simulate (i) the annual VOC emission rates as well as (ii) the OH. reactivity resulting from individual VOC emitted. Total VOC emissions from Salix was 1.5- and 2.5-fold higher compared to Miscanthus in non-fertilized and fertilized plantations, respectively. Isoprene was the dominating VOC in Salix (80-130 μg g-1 DW h-1), whereas it was negligible in Miscanthus. We identified twenty-eight VOC compounds, which were released by Miscanthus with the green leaf volatile hexanal as well as dimethyl benzene, dihydrofuranone, phenol, and decanal as the dominant volatiles. The pattern of VOC released from this species clearly differed to the pattern emitted by Salix. OH. reactivity from VOC released by Salix was ca. 8-times higher than that of Miscanthus. N fertilization enhanced stand level VOC emissions, mainly by promoting the leaf area index and only marginally by enhancing the basal emission capacity of leaves. Considering the higher productivity of fertilized Miscanthus compared to Salix together with the considerably lower OH. reactivity per weight unit of biomass produced, qualified the C4-perennial grass Miscanthus as a superior source of future bioenergy production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Hu
- College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Chair of Tree Physiology, Institute of Forest Sciences, University of Freiburg, Georges-Köhler Allee 53/54, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ann-Mareike Jarosch
- Chair of Tree Physiology, Institute of Forest Sciences, University of Freiburg, Georges-Köhler Allee 53/54, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Martin Gauder
- Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Simone Graeff-Hönninger
- Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Jörg-Peter Schnitzler
- Research Unit Environmental Simulation, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Rüdiger Grote
- Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research Division (IMK-IFU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kreuzeckbahnstr. 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
| | - Heinz Rennenberg
- Chair of Tree Physiology, Institute of Forest Sciences, University of Freiburg, Georges-Köhler Allee 53/54, 79110 Freiburg, Germany; College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Jürgen Kreuzwieser
- Chair of Tree Physiology, Institute of Forest Sciences, University of Freiburg, Georges-Köhler Allee 53/54, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Way DA, Long SP. Climate-smart agriculture and forestry: maintaining plant productivity in a changing world while minimizing production system effects on climate. PLANT, CELL & ENVIRONMENT 2015; 38:1683-1685. [PMID: 26248200 DOI: 10.1111/pce.12592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle A Way
- Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B7
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Steve P Long
- Institute of Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| |
Collapse
|