Pediatric cardiac waitlist mortality-Still too high

Impact of ventricular assist device use on pediatric heart transplant waitlist mortality: Analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database

BACKGROUND

Children awaiting heart transplant (Tx) have a high risk of death due to donor organ scarcity. Historically, ventricular assist devices (VADs) reduced waitlist mortality, prompting increased VAD use. We sought to determine whether the VAD survival benefit persists in the current era.

METHODS

Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified patients listed for Tx between 3/22/2016 and 9/1/2020. We compared characteristics of VAD and non-VAD groups at Tx listing. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for 1-year waitlist mortality.

RESULTS

Among 5054 patients, 764 (15%) had a VAD at Tx listing. The VAD group was older with more mechanical ventilation and renal impairment. Unadjusted waitlist mortality was similar between groups; the curves crossed ~90 days after listing (p = .55). In multivariable analysis, infant age (HR 2.77, 95%CI 2.13-3.60), Black race (HR 1.57, 95%CI 1.31-1.88), congenital heart disease (HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.04-1.46), renal impairment (HR 2.67, 95%CI 2.19-3.26), inotropes (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.09-1.52), and mechanical ventilation (HR 2.23, 95%CI 1.84-2.70) were associated with 1-year waitlist mortality. VADs were not associated with mortality in the first 90 waitlist days but were protective for those waiting ≥90 days (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.26-0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current era, VADs reduce waitlist mortality, but only for those waitlisted ≥90 days. The differential effect by race, size, and VAD type is less clear. These findings suggest that Tx listing without VAD may be reasonable if a short waitlist time is anticipated, but VADs may benefit those expected to wait >90 days.

Later Brain Death Declaration Correlates to Favorable Donor Characteristics but Decreased Heart Acceptance

BACKGROUND

With rates of potential donor heart discard as high as 66% nationally, quality improvement efforts must seek to optimize donor utilization. Whether the timing of donor brain death declaration (BDD) influences organ acceptance is understudied. The authors sought to characterize the impacts of time between donor hospital admission and BDD on heart utilization and posttransplant outcomes.

METHODS

All potential heart donors and recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were identified (2006-2021). Admission-to-BDD cohorts were: 1 to 2 d (n = 52 469), 3 to 4 d (n = 44 033), 5 to 7 d (n = 24 509), and 8 to 10 d (n = 8576). Donor clinical characteristics were compared between cohorts, and donor acceptance was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression. Recipient posttransplant survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Donor demographics and comorbidity profiles (diabetes and hypertension) were comparable across cohorts. Anoxia/overdose deaths were more common (10% > 21% > 24% > 18%, respectively) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation requirements were higher (37% > 52% > 58% > 47%) when BDD occurred longer after admission. Renal dysfunction (44% > 44% > 35% > 29%) and inotrope requirements (52% > 25% > 36% > 29%) were lower in the later BDD cohorts. Proportions of hepatic dysfunction (18%-21%) and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (13%-16%) were clinically equivalent. Donor acceptance differed by admission-to-BDD cohort (36% [1-2 d], 34% [3-4 d], 30% [5-7 d], and 28% [8-10 d]). Admission-to-BDD >4 d was independently associated with lower odds of acceptance on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.79, P  < 0.001). Recipients experienced equivalent posttransplant survival for all donor admission-to-BDD cohorts ( P  = 0.999 adults and P  = 0.260 pediatrics).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart donors with later BDD were disproportionately discarded despite similar-to-favorable overall clinical profiles, resulting in nearly 3000 fewer transplants during the study. Increased utilization of donors with later BDD and "high-risk" characteristics (eg, anoxia/overdose, cardiopulmonary resuscitation requirement) can improve rates of transplantation without compromising outcomes.

Pediatric heart transplantation: Looking forward after five decades of learning

Heart transplantation has become the standard of care for pediatric patients with end-stage heart disease throughout the world. Since the first transplant was performed in 1967, the number of transplants has grown dramatically with 13 449 pediatric heart transplants being reported to The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) between January 1992 and June 30, 2018. Outcomes have consistently improved over the last few decades, specifically short-term outcomes. Most recent survival data demonstrate that recipients who survive to 1-year post-transplant have excellent long-term survival with more than 60% of those who were transplanted as infants being alive 25 years later. Nonetheless, the rates of graft loss beyond the first year have remained relatively constant over time; driven primarily by our poor understanding and lack of treatments for chronic allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Acute rejection, CAV, graft failure, and infection continue to be the major causes of death within the first 5 years post-transplant. In addition, renal dysfunction, malignancy, and the need for re-transplantation remain as significant issues that require close follow-up. Looking forward, key challenges include improving donor utilization rates (including donation after cardiac death (DCD) and the use of ex vivo perfusion devices), the development of non-invasive biomarkers for rejection, efforts to mitigate the long-term effects of immunosuppression, and prevention of CAV. It is not possible to cover the entire evolution of pediatric heart transplantation over the last five decades, but in this review, we hope to touch on key observations, lessons learned, and practice changes that have advanced the field, as well as glance ahead to the next decade.

Increasing donor-recipient weight mismatch in infant heart transplantation is associated with shorter waitlist duration and no increased morbidity or mortality

OBJECTIVES

Infants awaiting paediatric heart transplantation (PHT) experience long waitlist duration and high mortality due to donor shortage. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we explored if increasing donor-recipient weight ratio (DRWR) >2.0 (recommended cutoff) was associated with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2020, 1392 infants received PHT. We divided cohort into 3 groups: A (DRWR ≤1.0, n = 239, 17%), B (DRWR 1.0-2.0, n = 947, 68%), C (DRWR >2.0, n = 206, 15%). Group characteristics and PHT outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

DRWR ranged between 0.5 and 4.1. Underlying pathology (congenital versus cardiomyopathy), gender, race, renal function and mechanical circulatory support were comparable between groups. Group C patients were more likely to be ventilated, to receive ABO blood group (ABO)-incompatible heart and to have longer donor ischaemic time. Waitlist duration was significantly shorter for group C (33 vs 50 days, P < 0.1). Early outcomes for groups A, B and C were the following (respectively): operative death (6%, 4%, 3%, P = 0.29), primary graft dysfunction (5%, 3%, 3%, P = 0.30), renal failure (10%, 7%, 7%, P = 0.42) and stroke (3%, 4%, 1%, P = 0.36). The DRWR group was not associated with operative death in either congenital (odds ratio (OR) = 0.819, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.523-1.282) or cardiomyopathy (OR = 1.221, 95% CI = 0.780-1.912) patients and only significant factor was pre-PHT extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR = 4.400, 95% CI = 2.761-7.010). Additionally, survival at 1 year (87%, 87%, 85%, P = 0.80) and 5 years (76%, 78%, 77%, P = 0.80) was comparable between the DRWR groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants who received PHT with DRWR >2.0, up to 4.1, experienced shorter waitlist duration with no demonstrable increase in peri-transplant complications, operative or late mortality. Historic practice to avoid DRWR > 2.0 due to complications (e.g. hypertension-related stroke, graft dysfunction, death) is not currently supported in infants and stretching DRWR acceptance criteria would decrease PHT waitlist duration and potentially improve waitlist complications and mortality.

Family perspectives of ex situ heart perfusion

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients awaiting a heart transplant have high waitlist mortality. Several strategies have been utilized to decrease waiting times, but a mortality risk still exists. New medical technologies may improve waiting times and associated mortality. Ex situ heart perfusion (ESHP) is one such technology, which can decrease the impact of cold ischemia on the donor heart and allow for a longer out-of-body time. Adoption of such technology in pediatric heart transplantation will require support from end users, including patient and families. The aim of this qualitative study was to report the perspectives of families with experience related to pediatric HTx toward ESHP.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 parents or guardians of children who were awaiting or received heart transplantation. Interviews were transcribed, and data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants expressed varied awareness and knowledge of ESHP. Independent of their understanding of ESHP, all purported that ESHP was an excellent idea and that this technology should be implemented in the pediatric population. They did not identify fundamentally different ethical issues or concerns for ESHP being used relative to other medical technologies. Overall, most participants described consent processes for ESHP should be like any other procedure. All agreed that the surgeon should continue to describe the overall health of the donor heart, provide their medical recommendations, and allow families to have the final say.

CONCLUSIONS

The concepts described by the parents and guardians are important in moving this novel technology forward. This information will serve the basis for knowledge translation that will provide educational resources to broaden the understanding and reach of ESHP.

Donor supply for partial heart transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common cause of birth defects worldwide. Valvular defects are a common form of CHDs, and, at this time, treatment options for children with unrepairable valve disease are limited. Issues with anticoagulation, sizing, and lack of growth in valve replacement options can lead to high mortality rates and incidence of reoperations. Partial heart transplantation, or transplantation of fresh valve allografts, has recently been described as a strategy to provide a durable and non-thrombogenic alternative to conventional prostheses and provide growth potential in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried to analyze the number of pediatric donor hearts that were not recovered but had viable valves (n = 3565) between January 2010 and September 2021. Recoverable valves were grouped by donor age: infants (age < 1 year), toddlers (age ≥1 and <3 years), and children (age ≥3 and <18 years). Demographic characteristics of donors were analyzed between age groups.

RESULTS

Infants, toddlers, and children had a total of 344, 465, and 2756 hearts with recoverable valves, respectively, over the study period, representing an average of 29, 39, and 230 hearts with recoverable valves per year.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study identify the minimum donor supply for partial heart transplantation. The actual number is likely higher because it includes hearts not entered in the UNOS database and domino transplants from orthotopic heart transplant recipients. Partial heart transplantation is logistically feasible as there are recoverable valves available for all age groups, fulfilling a clinical need in pediatric patients with unrepairable valve disease.

Pediatric risk to orthotopic heart transplant (PRO) score: Insights from United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) waitlist mortality findings

BACKGROUND

Pediatric heart transplant candidates on the waitlist have the highest mortality rate among all solid organ transplants. A risk score incorporating a candidate's individual risk factors may better predict mortality on the waitlist and optimize organ allocation to the sickest of those awaiting transplant.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, we evaluated a total of 5542 patients aged 0-18 years old on the waitlist for a single, first time, heart transplant from January 2010 to June 2019. We performed a univariate analysis on two-thirds (N = 3705) of these patients to derive the factors most associated with waitlist mortality or delisting secondary to deterioration within 1 year. Those with a p <0.2 underwent a multivariate analysis and the resulting factors were used to build a prediction model using the Fine-Grey model analysis. This predictive scoring model was then validated on the remaining one-third of the patients (N = 1852).

RESULTS

The Pediatric Risk to OHT (PRO) scoring model utilizes the following unique patient variables: blood type, diagnosis of congenital heart disease, weight, presence of ventilator support, presence of inotropic support, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo) status, creatinine level, and region. A higher score indicates an increased risk of mortality. The PRO score had a predictive strength of 0.762 as measured by area under the ROC curve at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

The PRO score is an improved predictive model with the potential to better assess mortality for patients awaiting heart transplant.

Optimal Donor Allograft Function: The Search for the Lowest Acceptable Donor Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Pediatric Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The availability of heart donors is limited by organ shortage. Due to concerns of reduced survival, donors with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) have been cautiously used in pediatric heart transplantation. One strategy to expand the donor pool is to re-evaluate whether lower donor LVEF may be acceptable for transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients <18 y receiving heart transplants from April 2007 to September 2021 using the United Network of Organ Sharing dataset. We excluded retransplants and multiorgan transplants. Cut-point analyses of LVEF was performed and Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare 1-y survival for new cut-points and the standard (LVEF >50%).

RESULTS

The analytic sample consisted of 5255 patients. Recipients receiving hearts with lower LVEFs were more likely to be on ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Recipients did not differ in waitlist times or transplant status. Cut-point analysis identified LVEF 45% as a potentially new cutoff. One-year survival of recipients of donors with LVEF ≥45% (92.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3%-92.8%) was similar to that of LVEF >50% (92.1%; CI, 91.4%-92.9%). Survival for the LVEF 45%-49% (88.8%; CI, 72.9%-95.7%) cohort was slightly lower than the ≥50% cohort, albeit nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year survival among pediatric heart transplants using a donor heart LVEF threshold of 45% or 40% was similar to a threshold of 50%. However, the finding is based on a small number of patients with LVEF <50%, and future larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the findings of this study before a lower LVEF threshold is considered.

Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic

For many patients with terminal/advanced cardiac failure, heart transplantation is the most effective, durable treatment option, and offers the best prospects for a high quality of life. The number of potentially life-saving donated human organs is far fewer than the population who could benefit from a new heart, resulting in increasing numbers of patients awaiting replacement of their failing heart, high waitlist mortality, and frequent reliance on interim mechanical support for many of those deemed among the best candidates but who are deteriorating as they wait. Currently, mechanical assist devices supporting left ventricular or biventricular heart function are the only alternative to heart transplant that is in clinical use. Unfortunately, the complication rate with mechanical assistance remains high despite advances in device design and patient selection and management, and the quality of life of the patients even with good outcomes is only moderately improved. Cardiac xenotransplantation from genetically multi-modified (GM) organ-source pigs is an emerging new option as demonstrated by the consistent long-term success of heterotopic (non-life-supporting) abdominal and life-supporting orthotopic porcine heart transplantation in baboons, and by a recent 'compassionate use' transplant of the heart from a GM pig with 10 modifications into a terminally ill patient who survived for 2 months. In this review, we discuss pig heart xenotransplantation as a concept, including pathobiological aspects related to immune rejection, coagulation dysregulation, and detrimental overgrowth of the heart, as well as GM strategies in pigs to prevent or minimize these problems. Additional topics discussed include relevant results of heterotopic and orthotopic heart transplantation experiments in the pig-to-baboon model, microbiological and virologic safety concepts, and efficacy requirements for initiating formal clinical trials. An adequate regulatory and ethical framework as well as stringent criteria for the selection of patients will be critical for the safe clinical development of cardiac xenotransplantation, which we expect will be clinically tested during the next few years.

Heart transplantation for pediatric foreign nationals in the United States

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify survival outcomes, waitlist mortality, and waitlist days of heart transplantation of pediatric foreign nationals compared to pediatric United States (US) citizens.

METHODS

We retrieved data from March 2012 to June 2021 in the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry.

RESULTS

Of 5857 pediatric patients newly waitlisted, 133 (2.27%) patients were non-US citizen/non-US residents (non-citizen non-resident [NCNR]). Patients with congenital heart disease were higher in the US citizen group than in the NCNR group (51.9% vs. 22.6%, p < .001); 76.7% of patients in the NCNR group (102/133) had cardiomyopathy. Of the 133 NCNRs, 111 patients (83.5%) underwent heart transplantation, which was significantly higher than that in the US citizen group (68.6%, p < .001). The median waitlist time was 71 days (IQR, 22-172 days) in the NCNR group and 74 days (29-184 days) in the US citizen group (p = .48). Survival after heart transplant was significantly better in the NCNR group than in the US citizen group (n = 3982; logrank test p = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart transplantation for pediatric foreign nationals was mostly indicated for cardiomyopathy, and their transplant rate was significantly higher than that in the US citizen group, with better survival outcomes. The better survival outcomes in the NCNR group compared to the US citizen group can likely be attributed to the differing diagnoses for which transplantation was performed.

Barriers and misconceptions of ex situ heart perfusion in pediatric donation

BACKGROUND

Despite efforts, pediatric HTx candidates continue to have high waitlist mortality due to limited donor availability. However, there is a significant number of offered hearts not used due to concerns of viability. ESHP is a method for continuous perfusion of the donor heart that allows assessment and extended out-of-body time. It is imperative to understand healthcare stakeholders' perspectives on ESHP for implementation. Therefore, the aims of this qualitative study were to: (1) Explore pediatric stakeholders' perspectives toward ESHP; and (2) Identify barriers to widespread adoption of this technology.

METHODS

Virtual focus groups were completed with pediatric HTx healthcare professional stakeholders. Following transcription of audio-recordings, the material was analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Four focus groups were completed with 17 participants, representing 12 institutions and three countries. Focus groups revealed varied understanding of both current and potential uses of ESHP. Participants did see the potential benefits of extending out-of-body time for and the ability to evaluate donor heart quality. However, concerns were expressed relating to patient selection, wait-list times, post-HTx outcomes, adverse events, and technical issues. These were felt to be important to understand in order to justify the costs of ESHP and impact on the healthcare system.

CONCLUSIONS

This project represents the first qualitative formative evaluation of ESHP in pediatrics. The knowledge gained from stakeholders will form the basis for education initiatives, clinical trial design, and roll-out of new ESHP technologies designed for pediatrics.

Palliated Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Patients Experience Superior Waitlist and Comparable Post-Heart Transplant Survival to Non-Single Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease Patients

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a well-established risk factor for inferior waitlist and post-heart transplant survival in children. Differences in outcomes between CHD subgroups are understudied. The present study compared outcomes for palliated hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) patients to other non-single ventricle CHD (non-SVCHD) and non-CHD patients. United Network for Organ Sharing was used to identify children (age < 18) listed for heart transplant in the United States between 2016 and 2021. CHD sub-diagnoses were only available for United Network for Organ Sharing status 1a after 2015, thereby defining the cohort. Waitlist outcomes were studied using competing-risk time-to-event analysis for transplantation, mortality/decompensation, and alive-on-waitlist. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with inferior post-transplant survival. Patients included: palliated-HLHS (n = 477), non-SVCHD (n = 686), and non-CHD (n = 1261). At listing, Palliated-HLHS patients were older than non-SVCHD (median 2-year [IQR 0-8] vs median 0-year [0-3], respectively) and younger than non-CHD (median 7-year [0-14]) (P < 0.001 vs both), and were more likely to be white (P < 0.01 vs both). Upon time-to-event analysis, rates of waitlist mortality/decompensation rates were greater among non-SVCHD than palliated-HLHS. Post-transplant survival was comparable between palliated-HLHS and non-SVCHD (P = 0.920) but worse compared to non-CHD (P < 0.001). Both palliated-HLHS (HR 2.40 [95% CI 1.68-3.42]) and non-SVSCHD (2.04 [1.39-2.99]) were independently associated with post-transplant mortality. Palliated-HLHS patients with heart failure experience significantly worse post-transplant outcomes than non-CHD but, compared to other CHD patients, experience superior waitlist and comparable post-transplant survival. While a high-risk cohort, HLHS patients can achieve gratifying waitlist and post-transplant survival.

Not all durations of preheart transplant mechanical ventilation portend inferior post-transplant survival in children

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation prior to pediatric heart transplantation predicts inferior post-transplant survival, but the impact of ventilation duration on survival is unclear.

METHODS

Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing and Pediatric Health Information System were used to identify pediatric (<18 years) heart transplant recipients from 2003 to 2020. Patients ventilated pretransplant were first compared to no ventilation, then ventilation durations were compared across quartiles of ventilation (≤1 week, 8 days-5 weeks, >5 weeks).

RESULTS

At transplant, 11% (511/4506) of patients required ventilation. Ventilated patients were younger, had more congenital heart disease, more urgent listing-status, and greater rates of nephropathy, TPN-dependence, and inotrope and ECMO requirements (p < .001 for all). Post-transplant, previously ventilated patients experienced longer ventilation durations, ICU and hospital stays, and inferior survival (all p < .001). Hospital outcomes and survival worsened with longer pretransplant ventilation. One-year and overall survival were similar between the no-ventilation and ≤1 week groups (p = .703 & p = .433, respectively) but were significantly worse for ventilation durations >1 week (p < .001). On multivariable analysis, ventilation ≤1 week did not predict mortality (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.85-1.43]), whereas ventilation >1 week did (HR: 1.18 [1.01-1.39]).

CONCLUSIONS

Longer pretransplant ventilation portends worse outcomes, although only ventilation >1 week predicts mortality. These findings can inform pretransplant prognostication.

Comparing donor and recipient total cardiac volume predicts risk of short-term adverse outcomes following heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

In pediatric heart transplantation, donor: recipient weight ratio (DRWR) has long been the sole metric for size matching. Total cardiac volume (TCV)-based size matching has emerged as a novel method to precisely identify an upper limit of donor organ size of a heart transplant recipient while minimizing the risk of complications from oversizing. The clinical adoption of donor: recipient volume ratio (DRVR) to prevent short-term adverse outcomes of oversizing is unknown. The purpose of this single-center study is to determine the relationship of DRWR and DRVR to the risk of post-operative complications from allograft oversizing.

METHODS

Recipient TCV was measured from imaging studies and donor TCV was calculated from published TCV prediction models. DRVR was defined as donor TCV divided by recipient TCV. The primary outcome was short-term post-transplant complications (SPTC), a composite outcome of delayed chest closure and prolonged intubation > 7 days. A multivariable logistic regression model of DRWR (cubic spline), DRVR (linear) and linear interaction between DRWR and DRVR was used to examine the probability of experiencing a SPTC over follow-up as a function of DRWR and DRVR.

RESULTS

A total of 106 transplant patients' records were reviewed. Risk of the SPTC increased as DRVR increased. Both low and high DRWR was associated with the SPTC. A logistic regression model including DRWR and DRVR predicted SPTC with an AUROC curve of 0.74. [95% CI 0.62 0.85]. The predictive model identified a "low-risk zone" of donor-recipient size match between a weight ratio of 0.8 and 2.0 and a TCV ratio less than 1.0.

CONCLUSION

DRVR in combination with DRWR predicts short-term post-transplant adverse events. Accepting donors with high DRWR may be safely performed when DRVR is considered.

Infants Who Require Total Parenteral Nutrition and Paralytics at Time of Heart Transplant Experience Inferior Post-Transplant Mortality

Background: Infants experience the worst one-year post-heart transplant (HTx) survival of any other pediatric group. Although mechanical ventilatory (MV) requirement at the time of transplant is an established predictor of post-transplant mortality, the impacts of commonly co-utilized support modalities such as total parenteral nutrition (TPN)-dependence and paralytics are understudied. Methods: All infant HTx recipients from 2003 to 2020 in both the United Network for Organ Sharing and Pediatric Health Information System databases were identified (n = 1344) and categorized depending upon support requirement at the time of transplant—none (59%), MV-only (10%), MV + Paralytics (2%), TPN-dependence-only (15%), MV + TPN (10%), and MV + Paralytics + TPN (4%). The primary study aim was to characterize the impact of TPN-dependence and paralytics on one-year post-transplant survival (PTS). Results: Compared to no-support, supported infants were generally at higher risk and more ill at transplant, with greater rates of congenital heart disease, renal and hepatic dysfunctions, and inotrope requirements. Post-transplant hospital outcomes were inferior among supported patients; all support groups experienced longer post-transplant MV, intensive care unit, and hospital lengths of stay (all P < .05 vs no-support). Upon multivariable analysis, each support modality independently predicted 1-year mortality (MV vs no-MV: 1.54 [1.10-2.14]; MV + Paralytics vs neither: 2.02 [1.25-3.27]; TPN vs no-TPN: 1.53 [1.10-2.13]; P < .01 for all), whereas no-support was protective (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.91]). Conclusions: Infants who require paralytics and/or who are TPN-dependent at the time of HTx experience worse one-year PTS. Such knowledge can assist in risk-stratification, and the identification of patients who would benefit from pretransplant optimization.

Pig heart and lung xenotransplantation: Present status

The recent pig heart transplant in a patient at the University of Maryland Medical Center has stimulated renewed interest in the xenotransplantation of organs from genetically engineered pigs. The barriers to the use of pigs as sources of organs have largely been overcome by 2 approaches - (1) the deletion of expression of the three known pig carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have preformed antibodies, and (2) the transgenic introduction of human 'protective' proteins, such as complement-regulatory proteins. These gene modifications, coupled with immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway, have resulted in survival of baboons with life-supporting pig heart grafts for almost 9 months. The initial clinical success at the University of Maryland reinforces encouraging preclinical results. It suggests that pig hearts are likely to provide an effective bridge to an allotransplant, but their utility for destination therapy remains uncertain. Because of additional complex immunobiological problems, the same approach has been less successful in preclinical lung xenograft transplantation, where survival is still measured in days or weeks. The first formal clinical trials of pig heart transplantation may include patients who do not have access to an allotransplant, those with contraindications for mechanical circulatory support, those in need of retransplantation or with a high level of panel-reactive antibodies. Infants with complex congenital heart disease, should also be considered.

Effect of ischemic time on pediatric heart transplantation outcomes: is it the same for all allografts?

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that the optimal ischemia time (IT) threshold in pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) is up to 4 h, independent of other donor organ factors. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between IT and donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and study their impact on PHT outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of PHT (<18 years) identified in UNOS between January 2000 and March 2020. Post-transplantation survival analysis of patients receiving donor hearts with IT<4, 4-6, and >6 h was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cohort was divided according to donor LVEF median value, and survival was analyzed. Cox regression was performed.

RESULTS

Median LVEF was 65% in the study cohort (6669 PHT). Overall, IT>6 h was associated with worse survival compared to <4 h regardless of donor LVEF. For allografts with LVEF < 65%, IT = 4-6 h was associated with worse survival compared with IT < 4 h (p = .006) but had similar survival compared with IT > 6 h (p = .315). For allografts with LVEF ≥ 65%, IT = 4-6 h had similar survival compared with <4 h (p = .175) but improved survival compared with >6 h (p = .003). After adjusting for donor and recipient variables, Cox regression showed that IT = 4-6 h was not associated with increased mortality for LVEF ≥ 65%.

CONCLUSIONS

The IT threshold of 4 h does not apply to all allografts. Recipients of hearts with LVEF≥65% can tolerate an IT up to 6 h without any detriment to survival. Routine acceptance of these donor hearts could mitigate longer waiting times and poor donor availability for many candidates.

Outcomes following use of pediatric and young adult donor hearts with bicuspid aortic valves: A single-center case series

BACKGROUND

Valvular disease in pediatric and young adult donor hearts may be a relative contraindication to graft use. Outcomes following the use of donor hearts with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have not been previously reported in children. We describe 4 cases of pediatric heart transplantation (HTx) utilizing a donor heart with a BAV.

CASE SERIES

Of the 469 HTx included in this study, 4 utilized a donor heart with a BAV. All recipients were female; median age was 11 years (range 0.3 to 19 years). In all cases, the BAV was not discovered until after HTx. All donors were less than 30 years old. The patients were followed for a median of 6 years (range 2 to 9 years) with all patients alive at last follow-up. Two patients have transitioned to adult care, and 2 patients continue to follow in our clinic. In follow-up, no patient has required an aortic valve intervention or had infective endocarditis. At last review, no patient had greater than mild aortic insufficiency or more than mild aortic stenosis. Three patients developed mild-to-moderate left ventricular hypertrophy in the first year post-transplant that improved over time. One patient experienced a peri-operative embolic stroke at time of transplant unrelated to the BAV.

CONCLUSION

On short- and intermediate-term follow-up, pediatric and young adult donor hearts with BAV demonstrated acceptable graft longevity and valvular function. A functionally normal BAV in a pediatric heart transplant donor should not be a contraindication to organ acceptance.

Ethical and practical dilemmas in cardiac transplantation in infants: a literature review

The waiting time in infants for a cardiac transplant remains high, due to the scarcity of donors. Consequently, waiting list morbidity and mortality are higher than those in other age groups. Therefore, the decision to list a small infant for cardiac transplantation is seen as an ethical dilemma by most physicians. This review aims to describe outcomes, limitations, and ethical considerations in infant heart transplantation. We used Medline and Embase as data sources. We searched for publications on infant (< 1 year) heart transplantation, bridge-to-transplant and long-term outcomes, and waiting list characteristics from January 2009 to March 2021. Outcome after cardiac transplant in infants is better than that in older children (1-year survival 88%), and complications are less frequent (25% CAV, 10% PTLD). The bridge-to-transplant period in infants is associated with increased mortality (32%) and decreased transplantation rate (43%). This is mainly due to MCS complications or the limited MCS options (with 51% mortality in infancy). Outcomes are worse for infants with CHD or in need of ECMO-support.Conclusion: Infants listed for cardiac transplantation have a high morbidity and mortality, especially in the period between diagnosis and transplantation. For those who receive cardiac transplant, the outlook is encouraging. Unfortunately, despite growing experience in VAD, mortality in children < 10 kg and children with CHD remains high. After transplantation, patients carry a psychological burden and there is a probability of re-transplantation later in life, with decreased outcomes compared to primary transplantation. These considerations are seen as an important ethical dilemma in many centers, when considering cardiac transplantation in infants (< 1 year). What is Known: • For infants, waitlist mortality remains high. In the pediatric population, MCS reduces the waiting list mortality. What is New: • Outcomes after infant cardiac transplantation are better than other age groups; however, MCS options remain limited, with persistently high waiting list mortality. • Future developments in MCS and alternative options to reduce waiting list mortality such as ABO-incompatible transplantation and pulmonary artery banding are encouraging and will improve ethical decision-making when an infant is in need of a cardiac transplant.

Current opinion in pediatric heart transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac transplant remains the most effective therapy for children with end-stage heart disease. Outcomes remain better than any alternative therapy for this condition, but its use is limited by donor organ availability. As a result, waitlist times and mortality on the waiting list remain unacceptably high. Novel approaches are necessary to address this problem.

RECENT FINDINGS

Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing readjusted the pediatric heart allocation system in 2016 to prioritize children at highest risk of mortality, encourage judicious listing, and improve appropriate donor organ utilization. Subsequent studies have aligned with these priorities to help risk-stratify patients at the time of listing and identify the importance that should be assigned to donor-specific factors. In addition, many authors are advocating for increased utilization of hearts donated after cardiac death. Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) application has also been increasing to help decrease waitlist mortality. Although results have significantly improved, there remain important limitations to widespread use of VADs in the pediatric population. This has prompted novel techniques such as pulmonary artery banding to improve cardiac function and, in some cases, promote recovery. The demand for cardiac replacement continues to increase with an ageing population of patients with congenital heart disease, presenting new challenges and stressors to the system.

SUMMARY

Pediatric cardiac transplant outcomes are excellent but remain plagued by the limited supply of donor organs. Recent strategies to combat this problem have focused on judicious listing, maximal utilization of available donor organs, and safely extending the lives of patients on the waitlist. New demands on the organ supply chain will continue to stress the system, making these efforts of the highest importance.Clinical Trial Registry Number not applicable.

Interplay between donor and recipient factors impacts outcomes after pediatric heart transplantation: An analysis from the united network for organ sharing database

BACKGROUND

Donor utilization rates continue to be low for pHT, however, efforts to expand the donor acceptance criteria have shown mixed results in single-institution studies in pediatric and adult transplantation. Purpose of this study is to assess impact of individual and cumulative donor risk factors on transplant outcomes as well as the interplay between donor and recipient risk factors as it relates to transplant outcomes.

METHOD

We analyzed pHT UNOS data (2008-2018) to compare the recipient characteristics, donor characteristics, and outcomes based on donor ejection fraction of less than 50% (low EF) and or ischemic time of greater than 4 hours (prolonged IT).

RESULTS

A total of 4345 pHT were performed of which 1309 (30.1%) were with prolonged IT and 122 (2.8%) in low EF. Additionally, 58 (1.3%) were performed with both low EF and prolonged IT (combined risk). Rest (2856 patients, 65.7%) was considered low risk. Recipients of combined risk were more likely to be younger, have post-surgical congenital heart disease, be on ECMO or ventilator but less likely on VAD (all P < .01) compared with any other group. Waitlist time was significantly lower for low EF (mean 39 days, 15-109) or combined risk group (36 days, range 15-80) compared with other groups (60 days, range 23-125) (P = .01). 1-year mortality was 8% in low-risk group, 12% in prolonged IT, 14% in reduced EF, and 28% in combined risk patients (P < .01). Number of treated rejections in one year were significantly higher in prolonged IT and combined risk group compared to other groups (P < .01). When stratified by recipient risk, there was no difference in outcomes for low risk, prolonged IT, or low EF groups; however, there were significant survival differences for high-risk recipient versus low-risk recipient in each donor group.

CONCLUSION

Lower EF donors performed similar to prolonged IT donor, but were uncommonly used. Acceptance of risk was common in recipients deemed higher risk for waitlist mortality and led to shorter wait times. Caution should be used in accepting combined risk transplants. The recipient risk factors have significant impact on outcomes across all donor risk groups and further analysis will help balance the waitlist mortality with post-transplant outcomes.

Pediatric heart transplant

Pediatric heart transplantation has additional and unique aspects from standard pediatric heart surgery and adult heart transplantation. The purpose of this article is to review pediatric heart transplantation and special surgical considerations. The methods used by the authors involved reviewing the literature and surgical techniques surrounding this patient population and procedure. The article presents a general review of the topic including the history, current state, surgical approaches, post-operative management, and outcomes in this patient population.

A coordinated approach to improving pediatric heart transplant waitlist outcomes: A summary of the ACTION November 2019 waitlist outcomes committee meeting

The number of children needing heart transplantation continues to rise. Although improvements in heart failure therapy, particularly durable mechanical support, have reduced waitlist mortality, the number of children who die while waiting for a suitable donor organ remains unacceptably high. Roughly, 13% of children and 25% of infants on the heart transplant waitlist will not survive to transplantation. With this in mind, the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Collaborative Learning Network (ACTION), through its Waitlist Outcomes Committee, convened a 2-day symposium in Ann Arbor, Michigan, from 2-3 November 2019, to better understand the factors that contribute to pediatric heart transplant waitlist mortality and to focus future efforts on improving the organ allocation rates for children needing heart transplantation. Using improvement science methodology, the heart failure-transplant trajectory was broken down into six key steps, after which modes of failure and opportunities for improvement at each step were discussed. As a result, several projects aimed at reducing waitlist mortality were initiated.

A comprehensive strategy in donor acceptance: Impact on pediatric waitlist and heart transplant outcomes

Significant inter- and intra-center practice variability is present in pediatric donor heart acceptability. This may contribute to variation in the donor refusal rate and may impact waitlist time, morbidity, mortality, and transplant rates. In order to reduce practice variability, our center developed and implemented a comprehensive strategy regarding donor acceptance in September 2017. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this strategy on waitlist time and outcomes as well as early post-transplant outcomes. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of all pediatric (<18 years) patients listed for single-organ heart transplant at our center from September 2015 to September 2018. Patients were divided into those listed before (Group 1) and after implementation of the comprehensive strategy (Group 2). The primary end-point was waitlist time. Secondary end-points included waitlist removal due to death or clinical deterioration, donor refusals per listed patient, early post-transplant outcomes (graft failure, mechanical ventilation time, inotropic support, length of hospital stay) and 1-year post-transplant survival. Of 78 listed patients, 54 were transplanted (29 in Group 1), 9 were removed due to death or clinical deterioration (7 in Group 1) and 15 were removed due to clinical improvement (12 in Group 1). The waitlist time was significantly shorter in Group 2 (17 days, IQR 7-53) vs Group 1 (90 days, IQR 14-162); P = .006. The number of donor refusals was lower in Group 2 (1, IQR 0-2.2) vs Group 1 (4, IQR 2-19); P < .001. The percentage of refused donors with normal function (Left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%) was lower in Group 2 vs Group 1 (53% vs 84%; P < .001). Difference in removal from the waitlist for death or deterioration in Group 2 vs Group 1 (n = 2, 7% vs n = 7, 20%, P = .18) did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in post-transplant outcomes between groups. The waitlist time and donor refusals significantly decreased after implementation of a comprehensive donor acceptance strategy without impacting transplant outcomes. This analysis supports the need for a comprehensive approach to donor organ acceptance within a pediatric transplant center.