A comprehensive strategy in donor acceptance: Impact on pediatric waitlist and heart transplant outcomes

Series Multiblood Pump Design With Dual Activation for Pediatric Patients With Heart Failure

The translational development of pediatric ventricular assist devices (VADs) lags years behind adult device options, negatively impacting pediatric patient outcomes. To address this need, we are developing a novel, series-flow, double-blood pump VAD that integrates an axial and centrifugal pump into a single device. The axial pump is used for initial circulatory assistance in younger patients; then, an internal activation mechanism triggers the centrifugal pump to activate in line with the axial pump, providing additional pressure and flow to match pediatric patient growth cycles. Here, we focused on the design and improvement of the device flow paths through computational analysis and in vitro hydraulic testing of a prototype. We estimated pressure-flow generation, fluid scalar stresses, and blood damage levels. In vitro hydraulic tests correlated well with shear stress transport (SST) predictions, with an average deviation of 4.5% for the complex, combined flow path. All data followed expected pump performance trends. The device exceeded target levels for blood damage in the blade tip clearances, and this must be both investigated and addressed in the next design phase. These study findings establish a strong foundation for the future development of the Drexel Double-Dragon VAD.

Donor heart refusal after circulatory death: An analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing refusal codes

Objective

Donor hearts procured after circulatory death (DCD) may significantly increase the number of hearts available for transplantation. The purpose of this study was to analyze current DCD and brain-dead donor (DBD) heart transplantation rates and characterize organ refusal using the most up-to-date United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data.

Methods

We analyzed UNOS and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network DBD and DCD candidate, transplantation, and demographic data from 2020 through 2022 and 2022 refusal code data to characterize DCD heart use and refusal. Subanalyses were performed to characterize DCD donor demographics and regional transplantation rate variance.

Results

DCD hearts were declined 3.37 times more often than DBD hearts. The most frequently used code for DCD refusal was neurologic function, related to concerns of a prolonged dying process and organ preservation. In 2022, 92% (1329/1452) of all DCD refusals were attributed to neurologic function. When compared with DBD, DCD donor hearts were more frequently declined as the result of prolonged warm ischemic time (odds ratio, 5.65; 95% confidence interval, 4.07-7.86) and other concerns over organ preservation (odds ratio, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 3.33-4.94). Transplantation rate variation was observed between demographic groups and UNOS regions. DCD transplantation rates are currently experiencing second order polynomial growth.

Conclusions

DCD donor hearts are declined more frequently than DBD. DCD heart refusals result from concerns over a prolonged dying process and organ preservation. Heart transplantation rates may be substantially improved by ex situ hemodynamic assessment, adoption of normothermic regional perfusion guidelines, and quality initiatives.

"Acquired" Brugada syndrome in a cardiac allograft

INTRODUCTION

Brugada syndrome is an inherited channelopathy characterized by arrhythmia and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantation of a defibrillator for primary or secondary prevention is the only effective strategy to decrease the risk of SCD in Brugada syndrome. We present a case in which a cardiac donor had a pathogenic variant for Brugada syndrome, discovered on genetic testing after transplantation.

CASE REPORT

A young child with dilated cardiomyopathy underwent orthotopic heart transplantation from a donor with in-hospital cardiac arrest in the context of fever and a normal ECG. Approximately 1 month after transplant, the donor's post mortem genetic testing revealed a pathogenic loss-of-function SCN5A variant associated with Brugada syndrome, which was confirmed on genetic testing on a post-transplant endomyocardial biopsy from the recipient. The recipient's post-transplant electrocardiographic monitoring revealed persistent right bundle branch block and progressive, asymptomatic sinus node dysfunction. The recipient was managed with precautionary measures including aggressive fever management, avoidance of drugs that increase arrhythmia risk in Brugada syndrome, and increased frequency of arrhythmia surveillance. The recipient remains asymptomatic at over 3 years post-transplant with preserved graft function and no documented ventricular arrhythmias.

CONCLUSION

We describe the clinical course of "acquired" Brugada syndrome in a cardiac allograft recipient, which has not been previously reported. The time-sensitive nature of donor organ selection, especially in critically ill recipients, combined with the growing use of molecular autopsies in patients with unexplained etiologies for death may increasingly result in important donor genetic information being made available after transplantation.

Trends in Survival for Pediatric Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Progress in pediatric transplantation measured in the context of waitlist and posttransplant survival is well documented but falls short of providing a complete perspective for children and their families. An intent-to-treat analysis, in which we measure survival from listing to death regardless of whether a transplant is received, provides a more comprehensive perspective through which progress can be examined.

METHODS

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze factors impacting intent-to-treat survival in 12 984 children listed for heart transplant, 17 519 children listed for liver transplant, and 16 699 children listed for kidney transplant. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess change in waitlist, posttransplant, and intent-to-treat survival. Wait times and transplant rates were compared by using χ2 tests.

RESULTS

Intent-to-treat survival steadily improved from 1987 to 2017 in children listed for heart (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.97), liver (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.97), and kidney (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99) transplant. Waitlist and posttransplant survival also improved steadily for all 3 organs. For heart transplant, the percentage of patients transplanted within 1 year significantly increased from 1987 to 2017 (60.8% vs 68.7%); however, no significant increase was observed in liver (68.9% vs 72.5%) or kidney (59.2% vs 62.7%) transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Intent-to-treat survival, which is more representative of the patient perspective than individual metrics alone, steadily improved for heart, liver, and kidney transplant over the study period. Further efforts to maximize the donor pool, improve posttransplant outcomes, and optimize patient care while on the waitlist may contribute to future progress.

Don't Throw Your Heart Away: Increased Transparency of Donor Utilization Practices in Transplant Center Report Cards Alters How Center Performance Is Evaluated

BACKGROUND

Publicly available report cards for transplant centers emphasize posttransplant survival and obscure the fact that some centers reject many of the donor organs they are offered (reflecting a conservative donor acceptance strategy), while others accept a broader range of donor offers (reflecting an open donor acceptance strategy).

OBJECTIVE

We assessed how the provision of salient information about donor acceptance practices and waitlist survival rates affected evaluation judgments of hospital report cards given by laypeople and medical trainees.

METHODS

We tested 5 different report card formats across 4 online randomized experiments (n1 = 1,003, n2 = 105, n3 = 123, n4 = 807) in the same hypothetical decision. The primary outcome variable was a binary choice between transplant hospitals (one with an open donor acceptance strategy and the other with a conservative donor acceptance strategy).

RESULTS

Report cards featuring salient information about donor organ utilization rates (transplant outcomes categorized by quality of donor offers accepted) or overall survival rates (outcomes from both waitlist and transplanted patients) led lay participants (studies 1, 3, and 4) and medical trainees (study 2) to evaluate transplant centers with open donor acceptance strategies more favorably than centers with conservative strategies.

LIMITATIONS

Due to the nature of the decision, a hypothetical scenario was necessary for both ethical and practical reasons. Results may not generalize to transplant clinicians or patients faced with the decision of where to join the transplant waitlist.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that performance evaluations for transplant centers may vary significantly based not only on what outcome information is presented in report cards but also how the information is displayed.

A coordinated approach to improving pediatric heart transplant waitlist outcomes: A summary of the ACTION November 2019 waitlist outcomes committee meeting

The number of children needing heart transplantation continues to rise. Although improvements in heart failure therapy, particularly durable mechanical support, have reduced waitlist mortality, the number of children who die while waiting for a suitable donor organ remains unacceptably high. Roughly, 13% of children and 25% of infants on the heart transplant waitlist will not survive to transplantation. With this in mind, the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Collaborative Learning Network (ACTION), through its Waitlist Outcomes Committee, convened a 2-day symposium in Ann Arbor, Michigan, from 2-3 November 2019, to better understand the factors that contribute to pediatric heart transplant waitlist mortality and to focus future efforts on improving the organ allocation rates for children needing heart transplantation. Using improvement science methodology, the heart failure-transplant trajectory was broken down into six key steps, after which modes of failure and opportunities for improvement at each step were discussed. As a result, several projects aimed at reducing waitlist mortality were initiated.