Genetic disease and intellectual disability as contraindications to transplant listing in the United States: A survey of heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant programs

Outcome of Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Literature Review

Access to solid organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability is associated with health inequities due to concerns about treatment adherence, survival rates, and post-transplant quality of life. This systematic literature review aims to compare outcomes after organ transplantation in patients with intellectual disability compared to patients without intellectual disability. Embase, Medline Ovid, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched for studies concerning pediatric or adult solid organ transplantation in recipients with a diagnosis of intellectual disability prior to transplantation. Primary outcomes were patient and graft survival rates. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection rate, adherence rates, and quality of life. Nine studies were included, describing kidney (n = 6), heart (n = 4) and liver (n = 1) transplantation. Reported graft survival rates were non-inferior or better compared to patients without intellectual disability, while patient survival was reportedly slightly lower in two studies reporting on kidney transplantation. Although current evidence has a potential selection bias based on including patients with a sufficient support network, intellectual disability alone should not be regarded a relative or absolute contra-indication for solid organ transplantation.

Challenges in Paediatric Xenotransplantation: Ethical Components Requiring Distinct Attention in Children and Obligations to Patients and Society

The transplantation of non-human organs into humans, or xenotransplantation (XTx), has recently garnered new attention and is being developed to help address the problem of organ scarcity in transplantation. Ethical issues surrounding XTx have been studied since initial interest arose decades ago and have experienced renewed discussion in the literature. However, the distinct and relevant differences when applied to children has largely been overlooked with few groups attending to the concerns that XTx in children raises. In this paper, we explore ethical challenges to be expected in paediatric XTx, in particular exploring organ sizing concerns, infectious risks, psychological burdens, and issues of moral hazard. We review these domains with the aim of highlighting the implications of pursuing paediatric XTx and the cross-disciplinary approach needed to solve these issues. Children require a unique analysis from a bioethical perspective to best prepare for the issues XTx presents.

Trisomy 21 and Congenital Heart Disease: Impact on Health and Functional Outcomes From Birth Through Adolescence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Due to improvements in recognition and management of their multisystem disease, the long-term survival of infants, children, and adolescents with trisomy 21 and congenital heart disease now matches children with congenital heart disease and no genetic condition in many scenarios. Although this improved survival is a triumph, individuals with trisomy 21 and congenital heart disease have unique and complex care needs in the domains of physical, developmental, and psychosocial health, which affect functional status and quality of life. Pulmonary hypertension and single ventricle heart disease are 2 known cardiovascular conditions that reduce life expectancy in individuals with trisomy 21. Multisystem involvement with respiratory, endocrine, gastrointestinal, hematological, neurological, and sensory systems can interact with cardiovascular health concerns to amplify adverse effects. Neurodevelopmental, psychological, and functional challenges can also affect quality of life. A highly coordinated interdisciplinary care team model, or medical home, can help address these complex and interactive conditions from infancy through the transition to adult care settings. The purpose of this Scientific Statement is to identify ongoing cardiovascular and multisystem, developmental, and psychosocial health concerns for children with trisomy 21 and congenital heart disease from birth through adolescence and to provide a framework for monitoring and management to optimize quality of life and functional status.

The Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Highly Dependent Incapacitated Patients with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Background/Objectives: Data regarding the outcomes of liver transplantation in disabled, highly dependent, and legally incapacitated adults are scarce, likely due to the infrequency of these procedures in such populations. Multicenter studies in adult transplant centers have shown that patients with coexisting intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) may be denied transplantation because of their expected low longevity and the complexities associated with managing post-transplant care. We examined the long-term patient and graft outcomes in highly dependent, incapacitated patients with IDDs who underwent elective transplantation for chronic liver disease. Methods: Six adult patients who underwent liver transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis (n = 2), hepatitis C cirrhosis (n = 2), Wilson's disease (n = 1), and autoimmune hepatitis (n = 1) were included. The main causes of their disability were infantile cerebral palsy, myotonia, and Niemann-Pick disease. Results: Four of the six patients were women, with a median age of 26 (range: 23-36) years. Only one patient died during follow-up. Their 1- and 5-year survival rates were 100 and 75%, respectively, which were not statistically different from those of the general cohort of electively transplanted patients (95.8 and 90.1%, respectively) (p = 0.35). Conclusions: Adult patients who are highly dependent, disabled, or legally incapable should not be denied liver transplantation because of poor long-term survival rates. Physiological disorders and psychiatric comorbidities should not prevent patients from receiving life-saving surgeries due to poor postoperative compliance or low quality of life.

Long-Term Outcomes After Lung Transplantation in Children With Intellectual Disabilities

BACKGROUND

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) started recording data on intellectual disability status in 2008. This study aimed to characterize the long-term outcomes for children with intellectual disabilities (IDs) undergoing lung transplantation.

METHODS

All pediatric patients (under 18 years old) undergoing bilateral lung transplantation were identified using the UNOS database. The patients were grouped into the following categories: no cognitive delay, possible cognitive delay, and definite cognitive delay. The primary endpoint was graft survival at 3-year posttransplantation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate the independent effect of cognitive disability on graft survival.

RESULTS

Five hundred four pediatric patients who underwent lung transplantation between March 2008 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. 59 had a definite cognitive delay (12%), 23 had a possible delay (5%), and 421 had no delay (83%). When comparing these three groups, there was no significant difference in 60-day graft survival (p = 0.4), 3-year graft survival (p = 0.6), 3-year graft survival for patients who survived at least 60-day posttransplantation (p = 0.9), distribution of causes of death (p = 0.24), nor distribution treatment of rejection within 1-year posttransplantation (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Intellectual disability does not impact long-term outcomes after bilateral lung transplantation. Intellectual disability should not be a contraindication to bilateral lung transplantation on the basis of inferior graft survival.

Solid Organ Transplantation for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities – Ethical Considerations and a Call for Clarity

Pediatric transplant centers are faced with the difficult task of maximizing the benefit of organs donated for transplantation while also ensuring that all patients undergoing transplant evaluation are fairly considered for this life-saving therapy. Children with neurodevelopmental disabilities are a complex patient population that on occasion may face the need for a solid organ transplant. Several concerns exist regarding transplantation in this population, yet standard transplant inclusion and exclusion criteria do not exist. Here we explore important factors regarding organ transplantation for children with neurodevelopmental disorders, including patient outcomes, quality of life considerations, and the fundamental ethical principles underlying this complex medical decision-making.

Heart transplantation in children and adults with Down syndrome: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND

In recent years, rapid advances in cardiac surgery and changes in attitude towards patients with cognitive disability have led to these patients receiving cardiac transplantation.

METHOD

This is a retrospective report describing the experience of four patients with Down Syndrome who received heart transplantation in a single institution.

RESULTS

Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy was the most common cause of heart failure in this group (3/4). Two patients were bridged to transplantation, one by using a combination of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation and biventricular assist device and the other by using a durable implantable left ventricular assist device. All the four patients are alive with the longest surviving patient 17 years after transplantation. Against strong hypothetical predictions, we observed no propensity for the development of post-transplant infections or lymphoproliferative disorders.

CONCLUSION

Down Syndrome should not be the sole contraindication to heart transplantation. The decision for transplantation should be on a case-by-case basis provided adequate social support is in place.

Heart Transplantation in Children With Down Syndrome

Background

Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a high risk of cardiac disease that may prompt consideration for heart transplantation (HTx). However, transplantation in patients with DS is rarely reported. This project aimed to collect and describe waitlist and post– HTx outcomes in children with DS.

Methods and Results

This is a retrospective case series of children with DS listed for HTx. Pediatric HTx centers were identified by their participation in 2 international registries with centers reporting HTx in a patient with DS providing detailed demographic, medical, surgical, and posttransplant outcome data for analysis. A total of 26 patients with DS were listed for HTx from 1992 to 2020 (median age, 8.5 years; 46% male). High‐risk or failed repair of congenital heart disease was the most common indication for transplant (N=18, 69%). A total of 23 (88%) patients survived to transplant. All transplanted patients survived to hospital discharge with a median posttransplant length of stay of 22 days. At a median posttransplant follow‐up of 2.8 years, 20 (87%) patients were alive, 2 (9%) developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and 8 (35%) were hospitalized for infection within the first year. Waitlist and posttransplant outcomes were similar in patients with and without DS (P=non‐significant for all).

Conclusions

Waitlist and post‐HTx outcomes in children with DS selected for transplant listing are comparable to pediatric HTx recipients overall. Given acceptable outcomes, the presence of DS alone should not be considered an absolute contraindication to HTx.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Heart Transplantation in Children with Genetic Disorders

BACKGROUND

Many congenital heart diseases (CHD) are associated with genetic defects. Children with complex CHD often develop heart failure, requiring heart transplant. Given the broad spectrum of genetic pathologies and dearth of transplants performed in these children, little is known regarding their outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of heart transplants performed at a high-volume center from 2007-2021. Patients were separated into pathogenic molecular and copy number variants, aneuploidies, and variants of uncertain significance, and compared to those without known genetic diagnoses. Variables included genetic diagnoses, bridge-to-transplant approach, preoperative comorbidities, operative characteristics, and postoperative complications. Outcomes included ICU-free days to 28 days, hospital mortality, survival, rejection, re-transplantation, and educational status at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

223 patients were transplanted over the study period: 9.9% (22/223) had pathogenic molecular variants, 4.5% (10/223) had copy number variants, 1.8% (4/223) had aneuploidies, and 9.0% (20/223) had variants of uncertain significance. The most common anomalies were Turner syndrome (n=3) and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (n=2). Children with aneuploidies had higher rates of hepatic dysfunction and hypothyroidism, while those with pathogenic copy number variants had higher rates of preoperative gastrostomy and stroke. Children with aneuploidies were intubated longer post-transplant, with greater need for re-intubation, and had the fewest ICU-free days. Mortality and mean survival did not differ. At median follow-up of 4.4 (1.9-8.8) years, 89.7% (26/29) of survivors with pathogenic anomalies were attending or had graduated school.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite more preoperative comorbidities, mid-term outcomes following heart transplant in children with genetic syndromes and disorders are promising.

Inequitable Access to Transplants: Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity

Inequitable access to deceased donor organs for transplantation has received considerable scrutiny in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests patients with impaired decision-making capacity (IDC) face inequitable access to transplantation. The "Ethical and Legal Issues" working group of the European Society of Transplantation undertook an expert consensus process. Literature relating to transplantation in patients with IDC was examined and collated to investigate whether IDC is associated with inferior transplant outcomes and the legitimacy of this healthcare inequality was examined. Even though the available evidence of inferior transplant outcomes in these patients is limited, the working group concluded that access to transplantation in patients with IDC may be inequitable. Consequently, we argue that IDC should not in and of itself be considered as a barrier to either registration on the transplant waiting list or allocation of an organ. Strategies for non-discrimination should focus on ensuring eligibility is based upon sound evidence and outcomes without reference to non-medical criteria. Recommendations to support policy makers and healthcare providers to reduce unintended inequity and inadvertent discrimination are set out. We call upon transplant centres and national bodies to include data on decision-making capacity in routine reporting schedules in order to improve the evidence base upon which organ policy decisions are made going forward.

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and its Impact on the Rare Disease Community: Threats, Challenges and Opportunities

Almost 1 in 10 individuals can suffer from one of many rare diseases (RDs). The average time to diagnosis for an RD patient is as high as 7 years. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based positron emission tomography (PET), if implemented appropriately, has tremendous potential to advance the diagnosis of RDs. Patient advocacy groups must be active stakeholders in the AI ecosystem if we are to avoid potential issues related to the implementation of AI into health care. AI medical devices must not only be RD-aware at each stage of their conceptualization and life cycle but also should be trained on diverse and augmented datasets representative of the end-user population including RDs. Inability to do so leads to potential harm and unsustainable deployment of AI-based medical devices (AIMDs) into clinical practice.

Ethical considerations in pediatric solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplantation is now an accepted therapeutic modality for children and teenagers suffering from a wide variety of complex medical conditions. Unfortunately, patients continue to die while on the organ waiting list as there remains an imbalance between the number of recipients listed for transplantation and the number of donors available. The organ allocation process continues to generate ethical questions and debates. In this publication, we discuss some of the most frequently reported ethical matters in the field of pediatric solid organ transplantation.

The continuing need to combat disability discrimination in organ transplantation

New evidence provides additional confirmation that when considering persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities, categorical exclusions as well as denials based on the need for support systems are unethical and discriminatory.

Ethics of Organ Transplantation in Persons with Intellectual Disability

Historically, individuals with intellectual disability and end-stage organ disease were discriminated against by transplant professionals and often excluded from transplantation waitlists. Despite antidiscrimination legislation, some transplant programs continue to include intellectual disability as a relative, if not an absolute, contraindication to listing for an organ; this is true for both pediatric and adult individuals in end-stage organ disease. This commentary opposes the absolute exclusion of patients with intellectual disability and end-stage organ disease from transplantation waitlists provided that the candidates are expected to gain a predefined minimum benefit threshold of life-years and quality-adjusted-life years. Intellectual disability is one of many factors that should be considered in determining transplant eligibility and each candidate should have an individualized interdisciplinary assessment.

Prevalence and Long-Term Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant in Children with Intellectual Disability

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence and long-term outcomes of kidney, liver, and heart transplant for children with an intellectual disability.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children receiving a first kidney, liver, or heart-alone transplant in the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset from 2008 to 2017. Recipients with definite intellectual disability were compared with those possible/no intellectual disability. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for graft and patient survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between intellectual disability and graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

Over the study period, children with definite intellectual disability accounted for 594 of 6747 (9%) first pediatric kidney-alone, 318 of 4566 (7%) first pediatric liver-alone, and 324 of 3722 (9%) first pediatric heart-alone transplant recipients. Intellectual disability was not significantly associated with patient or graft survival among liver and heart transplant recipients. Among kidney transplant recipients, definite intellectual disability was significantly associated with higher graft survival and lower patient survival, but the absolute differences were small.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with intellectual disability account for 7%-9% of pediatric transplant recipients with comparable long-term outcomes to other pediatric recipients. These findings provide important empirical support for policies that include children with intellectual disability as transplant candidates.