A simple dyspnoea scale as part of the assessment to predict outcome across chronic interstitial lung disease

Classification of Patients Based on Dyspnea and Desaturation During Exercise in Interstitial Lung Disease

Background: Dyspnea and desaturation during exercise are essential assessment items for pulmonary rehabilitation. Characterizing patients using these 2 factors may be important for providing more effective pulmonary rehabilitation. This study aimed to categorize subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD) using dyspnea and desaturation at the end of the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Methods: This was a retrospective study including 230 stable subjects with ILD who underwent 6MWT in our out-patient department at a general hospital in Japan. The modified Borg scale and oxygen saturation determined by SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT were used for cluster analysis using the k-means method with k = 4. Results: Subjects were classified into 4 characteristic clusters. SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT was lower in cluster 4 (80.5 ± 3.0%) than in clusters 1 (94.3 ± 2.0%), 2 (94.3 ± 1.9%), and 3 (87.9 ± 1.8%) and was lower in cluster 3 than in clusters 1 and 2. The modified Borg scale score at the end of the 6MWT was higher in clusters 2 (4 [3-8]), 3 (3 [0-9]), and 4 (4 [0-7]) than in cluster 1 (0.5 [0-2.0]) and was higher in cluster 2 than in cluster 3. Conclusions: Subjects with ILD were classified into 4 characteristic clusters using dyspnea and SpO2 at the end of the 6MWT. The 4 clusters are characterized as follows: Cluster 1 had mild desaturation and mild dyspnea; cluster 2 had mild desaturation and severe dyspnea; cluster 3 had both moderate desaturation and dyspnea, and cluster 4 had both severe desaturation and dyspnea. These classification data offer insight for individualized pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with ILD.

Worsening dyspnoea as a predictor of progression of pulmonary fibrosis

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), also known as progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD), is a term used to describe progressive lung fibrosis in a patient with an ILD other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [1]. Patients with PPF often experience burdensome symptoms such as cough and dyspnoea and impairment in their quality of life [2]. Several studies have reported associations between symptoms and subsequent disease progression in patients with pulmonary fibrosis [3–5], but little is known about the relationship between changes in symptoms and outcomes including survival.

Among patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis, worse dyspnoea at baseline and a worsening of dyspnoea over 24 weeks were associated with an increased risk of disease progression https://bit.ly/3APvQL7

Clinical utility of the Borg dyspnoea score in 6-minute walk tests in interstitial lung disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Exertional dyspnoea, a cardinal symptom in interstitial lung disease (ILD), can be objectively measured during a 6-min walk test (6MWT) using the Borg Dyspnoea Score (BDS). However, the clinical utility of this measurement is unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the association between 6MWT BDS and prognosis (mortality and lung transplantation), other 6MWT variables and measures of pulmonary function.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and SCOPUS databases were used to identify studies reporting an association between post-6MWT BDS and the relevant outcomes in adults with ILD. Language was limited to English. Study quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Study risk of bias tool. A narrative synthesis for each outcome was performed.

RESULTS

Ten full-text studies (n = 518) were included. Four studies had high overall risk of bias. Two studies (n = 127) reported prognosis and both found that higher 6MWT BDS was associated with increased all-cause mortality. However, the certainty of evidence was very low due to study design and likely publication bias. Higher post-6MWT BDS may be associated with shorter, or no effect on 6MWD; and lower pulmonary function. There was insufficient evidence that BDS correlated with 6MWT oxygen saturation.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-6MWT BDS has a potential role as a predictor of all-cause mortality in ILD, 6MWD and lower pulmonary function. Larger studies designed to confirm these relationships and assess the independent association between the 6MWT BDS and clinical outcomes are required.

Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease: An Exploratory Review on Molecular Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs) are characterized by shortness of breath caused by alveolar wall inflammation and/or fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE

Our review aims to study the depth of various variants of ILD, diagnostic procedures, pathophysiology, molecular dysfunction and regulation, subject and objective assessment techniques, pharmacological intervention, exercise training and various modes of delivery for rehabilitation.

METHOD

Articles are reviewed from PubMed and Scopus and search engines.

RESULTS

ILD is a rapidly progressing disease with a high mortality rate. Each variant has its own set of causal agents and expression patterns. Patients often find it challenging to self-manage due to persistent symptoms and a rapid rate of worsening. The present review elaborated on the pathophysiology, risk factors, molecular mechanisms, diagnostics, and therapeutic approaches for ILD will guide future requirements in the quest for innovative and tailored ILD therapies at the molecular and cellular levels.

CONCLUSION

The review highlights the rationale for conventional and novel therapeutic approaches for better management of ILD.

Breathlessness and exercise performance to predict mortality in long-term oxygen therapy - The population-based DISCOVERY study

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic respiratory failure treated with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) often have severe breathlessness, impaired exercise performance, and high but variable mortality that is difficult to predict. We aimed to evaluate breathlessness and exercise performance upon starting LTOT as predictors of overall and short-term mortality.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal, population-based study of patients who initiated LTOT between 2015-2018 in Sweden. Breathlessness was measured using the Dyspnea Exertion Scale, and exercise performance using the 30s-Sit-To-Stand test. Associations with overall and three-month mortality were analyzed using Cox-regression. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) respectively. The predictive capacity of models was assessed using a C-statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 441 patients (57.6% female, aged 75.4 ± 8.3 years) were analyzed, of whom 141 (32%) died during a median follow-up of 260 (IQR 75-460) days. Both breathlessness and exercise performance were independently associated with overall mortality in the crude models, but only exercise performance remained independently associated with overall mortality when models were adjusted for other predictors, when short-term mortality was analyzed, or when breathlessness and exercise capacity were analyzed concurrently. The multivariable model including exercise performance but not breathlessness provided a relatively high predictive capacity for overall mortality, C-statistic 0.756 (95% CI 0.702-0.810). Similar results were seen in the COPD and ILD subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Exercise performance as measured by the 30s-STS may be useful to identify patients with higher mortality on LTOT for optimized management and follow-up.

The Lung Transplant Candidate, Indications, Timing, and Selection Criteria

Lung transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with advanced lung disease. Demographics are evolving with recipients now sicker but determining candidacy remains predicated on one's underlying lung disease prognosis, along with the likelihood of posttransplant success. Determining optimal timing can be challenging, and most programs favor initiating the process early and proactively to allow time for patient education, informed decision-making, and preparation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation is used to elucidate disease progrnosis and identify risk factors for poor posttransplant outcomes. Candidacy criteria vary significantly by center, and close communication between referring and transplant providers is necessary to improve access to transplant and outcomes.

Optimizing Screening for Early Disease Detection in Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FLORIS): A Prospective Cohort Study Design

Background: Familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) can be defined as pulmonary fibrosis in two or more first-degree family members. The first-degree family members of FPF patients are at high risk of developing FPF and are eligible for screening. Reproducible studies investigating risk factors for disease are much needed. Methods: Description of the screening study protocol for a single-center, prospective cohort study; the study will include 200 asymptomatic, first-degree family members of patients with FPF who will undergo three study visits in two years. The primary objective is determining the diagnostic value of parameters for detection of early FPF; the secondary objectives are determining the optimal timing of the screening interval and gaining insight into the natural history of early FPF. The presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) changes on high-resolution computed tomography of the chest is indicative of preclinical ILD; the changes are determined at baseline. The comparison between the group with and without ILD changes is made for clinical parameters (pulmonary function, presence of digital clubbing, presence of Velcro-like crackles, blood count, liver- and kidney-function testing, patient-reported cough and dyspnea score) and exploratory parameters. Discussion: This study will be the first large-size, prospective, longitudinal cohort study for yearly screening of asymptomatic family members of FPF patients investigating the diagnostic value of parameters, including lung function, to detect early FPF. More effective screening strategies could advance early disease detection.

Patient-reported outcomes to assess dyspnoea in interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension: a systematic literature review of measurement properties

OBJECTIVE

This COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments (COSMIN)-based systematic review aims to identify and summarise the quality of measurement properties of dyspnoea-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary hypertension (PH) or connective tissue diseases (CTDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Relevant articles in PubMed and Embase were screened. Based on COSMIN analysis and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, overall rating and level of evidence were assessed to formulate recommendations. We identified 26 publications on 10 PROMs. For patients with ILD, including CTD-associated ILD, nine PROMs were evaluated, of which the Dyspnea-12 (D12), EXACT-Respiratory Symptoms Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Breathlessness subscale (ERS-IPF-B), King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Health Status Questionnaire breathlessness and activities subscale (KBILD-B) and the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ) had high-quality evidence for sufficient internal consistency, without high-quality evidence of insufficient measurement properties. We reached this same conclusion regarding the D12 for use in patients with PH, including CTD-associated PH. Most PROMs in this systematic review have moderate- or low-quality evidence on construct validity and responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

Four dyspnoea-specific PROMs, D12, ERS-IPF-B, KBILD-B and UCSD-SOBQ, can be recommended for use in patients with ILD, including CTD-associated ILD. Of these four, the D12, despite the limited evidence and the lack of evidence on several important domains, is also suitable for use in patients with PH, including CTD-associated PH.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Effects of different exercise training programs on the functional performance in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: A randomized trial

Objectives

We aimed to compare the effects of different aerobic exercise training (ET) programs on respiratory performance, exercise capacity, and quality of life in fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (f-ILD).

Methods

A case-control study where 31 patients with f-ILD diagnosis based on chest high-resolution computed tomography were recruited from Main Alexandria University hospital-Egypt. Ten patients were randomly assigned for only lower limbs (LL) endurance training program, and 10 patients for upper limbs, lower limbs, and breathing exercises (ULB) program for consecutive 18 sessions (3 sessions/week for 6 consecutive weeks). Eleven patients who refused to participate in the ET program were considered as control. All patients were subjected for St George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), forced spirometry and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) before and after ET programs.

Results

Fibrosing non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) and collagenic associated-ILD were the commonest pathologies among the ET groups (30% each) with mean age of 44.4±12.25 and 41.90±7.58 years for LL and ULB groups respectively and moderate-to-severe lung restriction. 6-MWT and SGRQ significantly improved after both ET programs (p<0.001). Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) improved significantly after both LL training (median of 22 (interquartile range (IQR) = 17.0–24.0) vs. 17.5 (IQR = 13.0–23.0) ml/kg/min, p = 0.032) and ULB training (median of 13.5 (IQR = 11.0–21.0) vs. 10.5 (IQR = 5.0–16.0) ml/kg/min, p = 0.018). Further, maximal work load and minute ventilation (VE) significantly improved after both types of ET training (p<0.05); however, neither ventilation equivalent (VE/VCO2) nor FVC% improved after ET (p = 0.052 and 0.259 respectively). There were no statistically significant important differences between LL and ULB training programs regarding 6-MWT, SGRQ or CPET parameters (p>0.05).

Conclusions

ET was associated with improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life in f-ILD patients irrespective of the type of ET program provided.

Immunomodulatory treatment of interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have an array of immunomodulatory treatment options compared with IPF, due to their inflammatory component. However, there is a relative paucity of guidance on the management of this heterogeneous group of diseases. In ILDs other than IPF, immunosuppression is the cornerstone of therapy, with varying levels of evidence for different immunomodulatory agents and for each specific ILD. Classification of ILDs is important for guiding treatment decisions. Immunomodulatory agents mainly include corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and rituximab. In this review, the available evidence for single agents in the most common ILDs is first discussed. We then reviewed practical therapeutic approaches in connective tissue disease-related ILD and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features, scleroderma-related ILD, vasculitis and dermatomyositis with hypoxemic respiratory failure, idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis sarcoidosis, fibrosing organizing pneumonia and eosinophilic pneumonia. The treatment of acute exacerbations of ILD is also discussed. Therapy augmentation in ILD is dictated by the recognition of progression of disease. Criteria for the evaluation of progression of disease are then discussed. Finally, specific protocol and measures to increase patients' safety are reviewed as well, including general monitoring and serologic surveillance, Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis, patients' education, genetic testing for azathioprine, MMF serum levels and cyclophosphamide administration protocols. Immunomodulatory therapies are largely successful in the management of ILDs and can be safely managed with the application of specific protocols, precautions and monitoring.

Validation of the risk stratification score in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: study protocol of a prospective, multi-centre, observational, 3-year clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a poor prognosis, with a progressive decline in lung function and considerable variability in the disease's natural history. Besides lung transplantation (LTx), the only available treatments are anti-fibrosing drugs, which have shown to slow down the disease course. Therefore, predicting the prognosis is of pivotal importance to avoid treatment delays, which may be fatal for patients with a high risk of progression. Previous studies showed that a multi-dimensional approach is practical and effective in the development of a reliable prognostic score for IPF. In the RIsk Stratification scorE (RISE), physiological parameters, an objective measure of patient-reported dyspnea and exercise capacity are combined to capture different domains of the complex pathophysiology of IPF.

METHODS

This is an observational, multi-centre, prospective cohort study, designed to reflect common clinical practice in IPF. A development cohort and a validation cohort will be included. Patients newly diagnosed with IPF based on the ATS/ERS criteria and multi-disciplinary discussion will be included in the study. A panel of chest radiologists and lung pathologists will further assess eligibility. At the first visit (time of diagnosis), and every 4-months, MRC dyspnea score, pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC and DLCO), and 6-min walking distance will be recorded. Patients will be prospectively followed for 3 years. Comorbidities will be considered. The radiographic extent of fibrosis on HRCT will be recalculated at a 2-year interval. RISE, Gender-Age-Physiology, CPI and Mortality Risk Scoring System will be calculated at 4-month intervals. Longitudinal changes of each variable considered will be assessed. The primary endpoint is 3-year LTx-free survival from the time of diagnosis. Secondary endpoints include several, clinically-relevant information to ensure reproducibility of results across a wide range of disease severity and in concomitance of associated pulmonary hypertension or emphysema.

DISCUSSION

The objective of this study is to validate RISE as a simple, straightforward, inexpensive and reproducible tool to guide clinical decision making in IPF, and potentially as an endpoint for future clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

U.S National Library of Medicine Clinicaltrials.gov, trial n. NCT02632123 "Validation of the risk stratification score in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis". Date of registration: December 16th, 2015.

Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.

Lung transplantation: candidate selection and timing of transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past two decades, lung transplant has become the mainstay of treatment for several end-stage lung diseases. As the field continues to evolve, the criteria for referral and listing have also changed. The last update to these guidelines was in 2014 and several studies since then have changed how patients are transplanted. Our article aims to briefly discuss these updates in lung transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article discusses the importance of early referral of patients for lung transplantation and the concept of the 'transplant window'. We review the referral and listing criteria for some common pulmonary diseases and also cite the updated literature surrounding the absolute and relative contraindications keeping in mind that they are a constantly moving target. Frailty and psychosocial barriers are difficult to assess with the current assessment tools but continue to impact posttransplant outcomes. Finally, we discuss the limited data on transplantation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID19 as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to transplantation.

SUMMARY

The findings discussed in this article will strongly impact, if not already, how we select candidates for lung transplantation. It also addresses some aspects of lung transplant such as frailty and ARDS, which need better assessment tools and clinical data.

A mixed-methods pilot study of handheld fan for breathlessness in interstitial lung disease

Dyspnoea is a cardinal symptom of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), with a lack of proven effective therapies. With emerging evidence of the role of facial and nasal airflow for relieving breathlessness, this pilot study was conducted to examine the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial of a handheld fan (HHF) for dyspnoea management in patients with fibrotic ILD. In this mixed-methods, randomised, assessor-blinded, controlled trial, 30 participants with fibrotic ILD who were dyspnoeic with a modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea grade ≥ 2 were randomised to a HHF for symptom control or no intervention for 2 weeks. Primary outcomes were trial feasibility, change in Dyspnoea-12 scores at Week 2, and participants’ perspectives on using a HHF for dyspnoea management. Study recruitment was completed within nine months at a single site. Successful assessor blinding was achieved in the fan group [Bang’s Blinding Index − 0.08 (95% CI − 0.45, 0.30)] but not the control group [0.47 (0.12, 0.81)]. There were no significant between-group differences for the change in Dyspnoea-12 or secondary efficacy outcomes. During qualitative interviews, participants reported that using the HHF relieved breathlessness and provided relaxation, despite initial scepticism about its therapeutic benefit. Oxygen-experienced participants described the HHF being easier to use, but not as effective for symptomatic relief, compared to oxygen therapy. Our results confirmed the feasibility of a clinical trial of a HHF in fibrotic ILD. There was a high level of patient acceptance of a HHF for managing dyspnoea, with patients reporting both symptomatic benefits and ease of use.

What parameters can be used to identify early idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?

Elucidating the disease process of early idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) will help clinicians in addressing the contentious issues of when and in which patients, therapeutic intervention should be initiated. Here, we discuss several possible parameters for diagnosing early IPF and their clinical impacts. Physiologically, early IPF can be considered as IPF with normal or mild impairment in pulmonary function. Radiologically, early IPF can be considered as IPF with a small extent and/or early features of fibrosis. Symptomatically, early IPF can be considered as asymptomatic or less symptomatic IPF. IPF at Gender-Age-Physiology index stage I can be considered early IPF. Interstitial lung abnormalities are defined as parenchymal abnormalities in more than 5% of the lung in patients with no prior history of interstitial lung disease, and in some cases, this seems to be equivalent to early IPF. Previous clinical trials showed the effect of antifibrotic therapies in early IPF, but the effects of therapy are uncertain in early IPF outside of clinical trials, such as in cases of IPF with normal pulmonary function, IPF without honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis, and asymptomatic IPF. Moreover, little has been reported on disease progression in such conditions. Because the conceptual framework of early IPF may vary depending on its definition, not only is a diagnosis of early IPF important but prediction of disease progression is also crucial. Further investigations are needed to identify biomarkers that can detect patients who may experience greater degrees of disease progression and require treatment even with those forms of early IPF.

Monitoring and management of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a narrative review for practicing clinicians

Close monitoring of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) is important to enable prompt identification and management of progressive disease. Monitoring should involve regular assessment of physiology (including pulmonary function tests), symptoms, and, when appropriate, high-resolution computed tomography. The management of patients with fibrosing ILDs requires a multidisciplinary approach and should be individualized based on factors such as disease severity, evidence of progression, risk factors for progression, comorbidities, and the preferences of the patient. In this narrative review, we discuss how patients with fibrosing ILDs can be effectively monitored and managed in clinical practice.

Management of interstitial lung diseases: A consensus statement of the Indian Chest Society (ICS) and National College of Chest Physicians (NCCP)

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a complex and heterogeneous group of acute and chronic lung diseases of several known and unknown causes. While clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have been recently updated, CPG for ILD other than IPF are needed.

METHODS

A working group of multidisciplinary clinicians familiar with clinical management of ILD (pulmonologists, radiologist, pathologist, and rheumatologist) and three epidemiologists selected by the leaderships of Indian Chest Society and National College of Chest Physicians, India, posed questions to address the clinically relevant situation. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A modified GRADE approach was used to grade the evidence. The working group discussed the evidence and reached a consensus of opinions for each question following face-to-face discussions.

RESULTS

Statements have been made for each specific question and the grade of evidence has been provided after performing a systematic review of literature. For most of the questions addressed, the available evidence was insufficient and of low to very low quality. The consensus of the opinions of the working group has been presented as statements for the questions and not as an evidence-based CPG for the management of ILD.

CONCLUSION

This document provides the guidelines made by consensus of opinions among experts following discussion of systematic review of evidence pertaining to the specific questions for management of ILD other than IPF. It is hoped that this document will help the clinician understand the accumulated evidence and help better management of idiopathic and nonidiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

Heterogeneity in Unclassifiable Interstitial Lung Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

RATIONALE

Accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung disease is necessary to identify the most appropriate management strategy and to inform prognosis. Many patients cannot be provided a confident diagnosis, despite an exhaustive search for potential etiologies and review in a multidisciplinary conference, and are consequently labeled with unclassifiable interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and meta-analyze previous studies reporting on the diagnostic criteria, prevalence, clinical features, and outcome of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for all studies related to unclassifiable interstitial lung disease published before September 1, 2017. Two authors independently screened each citation for eligibility criteria, serially reviewing the title, abstract, and full-text manuscript, and then abstracted data pertaining to the study objectives from eligible studies. Articles were stratified by risk of selection bias, whether the publication stated that patients were reviewed in a multidisciplinary discussion, and by the frequency of surgical lung biopsy. Meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed to calculate the pooled prevalence of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease within an interstitial lung disease population and within specific subgroups to identify reasons for across-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The search identified 10,130 unique citations, 313 articles underwent full-text review, and eligibility criteria were met in 88 articles. Twenty-two studies were deemed low risk of selection bias, including 1,060 patients with unclassifiable interstitial lung disease from a total of 10,174 patients with interstitial lung disease. The terminology and definition of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease varied substantially across publications, with inconsistent diagnostic criteria and evaluation processes. The prevalence of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease was 11.9% (95% confidence interval, 8.5-15.6%), with lower prevalence in centers that reported use of a formal multidisciplinary discussion of cases (9.5% vs. 14.5%). Four articles reported survival of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease, with 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival of 84% to 89%, 70% to 76%, and 46% to 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that unclassifiable interstitial lung disease is common but has substantial heterogeneity and inconsistent definitions across interstitial lung disease cohorts. These findings highlight important limitations in multicenter studies of fibrotic interstitial lung disease and the need for a standardized approach to interstitial lung disease diagnostic classification.

Acute exacerbations of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Acute exacerbation (AE) is a severe complication of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF). In 2016, an international working group revised its definition and diagnostic criteria; however, few studies have assessed the frequency and prognosis of AE in patients with other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (FILD).

METHODS

We used data from 1019 consecutive interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients initially evaluated between January 2008 and July 2015. All subject diagnoses were made by multidisciplinary discussion in December 2018. ILD was categorized as IPF (n = 462) and other FILD which included non-specific interstitial pneumonia (n = 22), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n = 29), connective tissue disease-associated ILD (n = 205) and unclassifiable ILD (n = 209). Using the 2016 definition of AE-IPF, we identified all subjects with an AE.

RESULTS

During the observational period, 193 patients experienced a first AE (AE-FILD n = 69, AE-IPF n = 124). The time to first AE was significantly longer in FILD than IPF (log-rank test, P < 0.001). After adjusting for potentially influential confounders, FILD remained a significant predictor of longer time to first AE compared with IPF (hazard ratio: 0.453; 95% CI: 0.317-0.647, P = 0.006). In a multivariate Cox proportional analysis, baseline disease severity was closely associated with the incidence of AE-ILD. Even after adjustment for other clinical variables, AE had a negative impact on overall survival. AE-FILD and AE-IPF showed similar poor short-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

All forms of ILD are at risk of AE and have a similar outcome to AE-IPF.

Unclassifiable interstitial lung disease: from phenotyping to possible treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) can be challenging, and a substantial percentage of ILD patients remain unclassifiable even after thorough assessment by an experienced multidisciplinary team. In this review, we summarize the recent literature on the definition, prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of unclassifiable ILD, and also discuss important current issues and provide future perspectives on the classification of ILD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approximately 12% of patients with ILD are considered unclassifiable, with large variability across previous studies that is in part secondary to inconsistent definitions of unclassifiable ILD and other ILD subtypes. A recent International Working Group suggested that unclassifiable ILD should be defined by the absence of a leading diagnosis that is considered more likely than not after multidisciplinary discussion of all available information. Clinical features and outcomes of unclassifiable ILD are intermediate between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonidiopathic pulmonary fibrosis ILD cohorts, and choices for pharmacotherapy should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

SUMMARY

Recent studies have provided additional data on the clinical features and prognosis of unclassifiable ILD, but also highlight the many uncertainties that still exist in ILD diagnosis and classification. New tools are needed to more accurately characterize patients with unclassifiable ILD.

Pathophysiological mechanisms of exertional breathlessness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), particularly during exercise. Effective medical management of exertional breathlessness in people living with COPD and fibrotic ILD is challenging for healthcare providers and requires an understanding of its mechanisms. Thus, in this brief review we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of exertional breathlessness in COPD and fibrotic ILD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The collective results of recent physiological and clinical trials suggest that higher intensity ratings of exertional breathlessness in both COPD and fibrotic ILD compared to healthy control individuals is mechanistically linked to the awareness of greater neural respiratory drive (quantified using inspiratory muscle electromyography) needed to compensate for pathophysiological abnormalities in respiratory mechanics and pulmonary gas exchange efficiency.

SUMMARY

Any therapeutic intervention capable of decreasing intrinsic mechanical loading of the respiratory system and/or increasing pulmonary gas exchange efficiency has the potential to decrease the prevalence and severity of activity-related breathlessness and improve related clinical and patient-reported outcomes (e.g., exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life) by decreasing neural respiratory drive in people with COPD and fibrotic ILD.

Performance of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a self-administered questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in various chronic respiratory diseases. Few studies have assessed the performance of the SGRQ in patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD). We aimed to examine the SGRQ's performance characteristics and generate data to support its reliability and validity in patients with CTD-ILD.

METHODS

We used data from 193 CTD-ILD patients evaluated at Tosei General Hospital from May 2007 to July 2016 to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the SGRQ.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64.2 years and 122 (63.2%) were women. There were no significant differences in SGRQ scores between any of the CTD groups. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.905) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.873) for the SGRQ total score were excellent. At baseline, SGRQ total score was significantly associated with clinically meaningful measures of physiological function, exercise capacity and dyspnoea. Change in SGRQ total score over 6 months was also associated with change in other measures. Cox proportional hazards models showed that higher baseline SGRQ total score was a significant predictor of mortality. The estimated minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ total score was 4-13 points.

CONCLUSION

These data support the validity and reliability of SGRQ as a sensitive measure for capturing HRQoL in patients with CTD-ILD.

Italian version of Dyspnoea-12: cultural-linguistic validation, quantitative and qualitative content validity study

Background:

Dyspnoea-12 is a valid and reliable scale to assess dyspneic symptom, considering its severity, physical and emotional components. However, it is not available in Italian version due to it was not yet translated and validated. For this reason, the aim of this study was to develop an Italian version Dyspnoea-12, providing a cultural and linguistic validation, supported by the quantitative and qualitative content validity.

Methods:

This was a methodological study, divided into two phases: phase one is related to the cultural and linguistic validation, phase two is related to test the quantitative and qualitative content validity. Linguistic validation followed a standardized translation process. Quantitative content validity was assessed computing content validity ratio (CVR) and index (I-CVIs and S-CVI) from expert panellists response. Qualitative content validity was assessed by the narrative analysis on the answers of three open-ended questions to the expert panellists, aimed to investigate the clarity and the pertinence of the Italian items.

Results:

The translation process found a good agreement in considering clear the items in both the six involved bilingual expert translators and among the ten voluntary involved patients. CVR, I-CVIs and S-CVI were satisfactory for all the translated items.

Conclusions:

This study has represented a pivotal step to use Dyspnoea-12 amongst Italian patients. Future researches are needed to deeply investigate the Italian version of Dyspnoea-12 construct validity and its reliability, and to describe how dyspnoea components (i.e. physical and emotional) impact the life of patients with cardiorespiratory diseases. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Evaluating disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Accurate assessment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) disease severity is integral to the care provided to patients with IPF. However, to date, there are no generally accepted or validated staging systems. There is an abundance of data on using information acquired from physiological, radiological and pathological parameters, in isolation or in combination, to assess disease severity in IPF. Recently, there has been interest in using serum biomarkers and computed tomography-derived quantitative lung fibrosis measures to stage disease severity in IPF. This review will focus on the suggested methods for staging IPF, at baseline and on serial assessment, their strengths and limitations, as well as future developments.