Dialysate bicarbonate concentration: Too much of a good thing?

Mathematical modelling of bicarbonate supplementation and acid-base chemistry in kidney failure patients on hemodialysis

Acid-base regulation by the kidneys is largely missing in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Bicarbonate is added to the dialysis fluid during HD to replenish the buffers in the body and neutralize interdialytic acid accumulation. Predicting HD outcomes with mathematical models can help select the optimal patient-specific dialysate composition, but the kinetics of bicarbonate are difficult to quantify, because of the many factors involved in the regulation of the bicarbonate buffer in bodily fluids. We implemented a mathematical model of dissolved CO2 and bicarbonate transport that describes the changes in acid-base equilibrium induced by HD to assess the kinetics of bicarbonate, dissolved CO2, and other buffers not only in plasma but also in erythrocytes, interstitial fluid, and tissue cells; the model also includes respiratory control over the partial pressures of CO2 and oxygen. Clinical data were used to fit the model and identify missing parameters used in theoretical simulations. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of the model in describing the changes to acid-base homeostasis typical of HD, and highlight the importance of respiratory regulation during HD.

Acid-base balance in hemodialysis patients in everyday practice

Introduction

Abnormalities in blood bicarbonates (HCO₃^–) concentration are a common finding in patients with chronic kidney disease, especially at the end-stage renal failure. Initiating of hemodialysis does not completely solve this problem. The recommendations only formulate the target concentration of ≥22 mmol/L before hemodialysis but do not guide how to achieve it. The aim of the study was to assess the acid–base balance in everyday practice, the effect of hemodialysis session and possible correlations with clinical and biochemical parameters in stable hemodialysis patients.

Material and methods

We enrolled 75 stable hemodialysis patients (mean age 65.5 years, 34 women), from a single Department of Nephrology. We assessed blood pressure, and acid–base balance parameters before and after mid-week hemodialysis session.

Results

We found significant differences in pH, HCO₃^– pCO₂, lactate before and after HD session in whole group (p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.001, respectively). Buffer bicarbonate concentration had only statistically significant effect on the bicarbonate concentration after dialysis (p < 0.001). Both pre-HD acid–base parameters and post-HD pH were independent from buffer bicarbonate content. We observed significant inverse correlations between change in the serum bicarbonates and only two parameters: pH and HCO₃^– before hemodialysis (p = 0.013; p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Despite the improvement in hemodialysis techniques, acid–base balance still remains a challenge. The individual selection of bicarbonate in bath, based on previous single tests, does not improve permanently the acid–base balance in the population of hemodialysis patients. New guidelines how to correct acid–base disorders in hemodialysis patients are needed to have less ‘acidotic’ patients before hemodialysis and less ‘alkalotic’ patients after the session.

Tailoring the dialysate bicarbonate eliminates pre-dialysis acidosis and post-dialysis alkalosis

Background

Both metabolic acidosis and alkalosis increase hospitalizations, haemodynamic instability and mortality in haemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, current practices opt for a one-size-fits-all approach, leaving many patients either acidotic before or alkalotic after dialysis sessions. Therefore an individualized adjustment of these patients’ dialysate bicarbonate prescriptions could reduce these acid–base imbalances.

Methods

This is a prospective single-cohort study of patients on a chronic haemodiafiltration programme. The dialysate bicarbonate prescription was modified according to the pre- and post-dialysis total carbon dioxide (TCO₂) values of 19–25 mEq/L and ≤29 mEq/L, respectively, with an adjustment formula calculated with the data obtained from previously published work by our group. In addition, we analysed this adjustment's effect on plasma sodium, potassium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium.

Results

At baseline, only 67.9% of patients were within the desired pre- and post-dialysis TCO₂ target range. As of the first month, every followed patient met the TCO₂ target range objective in pre-dialysis measurements and ˃95% met the post-dialysis TCO₂ target. At the end of the study, 75% of the patients were on dialysate bicarbonate of 32–34 mEq/L. There were no clinically significant changes in calcium, phosphate, PTH, sodium or potassium levels. Also, we did not notice any increase in intradialytic adverse events.

Conclusions

We suggest an individualized adjustment of the dialysate bicarbonate concentration according to the pre- and post-dialysis TCO₂ values. With it, nearly every patient in our cohort reached the established range, potentially reducing their mortality risk.

Hidden risks associated with conventional short intermittent hemodialysis: A call for action to mitigate cardiovascular risk and morbidity

The development of maintenance hemodialysis (HD) for end stage kidney disease patients is a success story that continues to save many lives. Nevertheless, intermittent renal replacement therapy is also a source of recurrent stress for patients. Conventional thrice weekly short HD is an imperfect treatment that only partially corrects uremic abnormalities, increases cardiovascular risk, and exacerbates disease burden. Altering cycles of fluid loading associated with cardiac stretching (interdialytic phase) and then fluid unloading (intradialytic phase) likely contribute to cardiac and vascular damage. This unphysiologic treatment profile combined with cyclic disturbances including osmotic and electrolytic shifts may contribute to morbidity in dialysis patients and augment the health burden of treatment. As such, HD patients are exposed to multiple stressors including cardiocirculatory, inflammatory, biologic, hypoxemic, and nutritional. This cascade of events can be termed the dialysis stress storm and sickness syndrome. Mitigating cardiovascular risk and morbidity associated with conventional intermittent HD appears to be a priority for improving patient experience and reducing disease burden. In this in-depth review, we summarize the hidden effects of intermittent HD therapy, and call for action to improve delivered HD and develop treatment schedules that are better tolerated and associated with fewer adverse effects.

Multitargeted interventions to reduce dialysis-induced systemic stress

Hemodialysis (HD) is a life-sustaining therapy as well as an intermittent and repetitive stress condition for the patient. In ridding the blood of unwanted substances and excess fluid from the blood, the extracorporeal procedure simultaneously induces persistent physiological changes that adversely affect several organs. Dialysis patients experience this systemic stress condition usually thrice weekly and sometimes more frequently depending on the treatment schedule. Dialysis-induced systemic stress results from multifactorial components that include treatment schedule (i.e. modality, treatment time), hemodynamic management (i.e. ultrafiltration, weight loss), intensity of solute fluxes, osmotic and electrolytic shifts and interaction of blood with components of the extracorporeal circuit. Intradialytic morbidity (i.e. hypovolemia, intradialytic hypotension, hypoxia) is the clinical expression of this systemic stress that may act as a disease modifier, resulting in multiorgan injury and long-term morbidity. Thus, while lifesaving, HD exposes the patient to several systemic stressors, both hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic in origin. In addition, a combination of cardiocirculatory stress, greatly conditioned by the switch from hypervolemia to hypovolemia, hypoxemia and electrolyte changes may create pro-arrhythmogenic conditions. Moreover, contact of blood with components of the extracorporeal circuit directly activate circulating cells (i.e. macrophages-monocytes or platelets) and protein systems (i.e. coagulation, complement, contact phase kallikrein-kinin system), leading to induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and resulting in chronic low-grade inflammation, further contributing to poor outcomes. The multifactorial, repetitive HD-induced stress that globally reduces tissue perfusion and oxygenation could have deleterious long-term consequences on the functionality of vital organs such as heart, brain, liver and kidney. In this article, we summarize the multisystemic pathophysiological consequences of the main circulatory stress factors. Strategies to mitigate their effects to provide more cardioprotective and personalized dialytic therapies are proposed to reduce the systemic burden of HD.

Oral sodium bicarbonate in people on haemodialysis: a randomised controlled trial

Background

Adverse events and mortality tend to cluster around dialysis sessions, potentially due to the impact of the saw-toothed profile of uraemic toxins such as potassium, peaking pre-dialysis and rapidly dropping during dialysis. Acidosis could be contributing to this harm by exacerbating a rise in potassium. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of oral bicarbonate treatment on reducing inter-dialytic potassium gain as well as other clinical consequences of preserving muscle mass and function and reducing intradialytic arrhythmia risk in people on haemodialysis.

Methods

Open-label randomised controlled trial in a single-centre (London, UK). Forty-three clinically stable adults on haemodialysis were recruited, with a 6 month average pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate level < 22 mmol/l and potassium > 4 mmol/l. Thirty-three participants completed the study. Oral sodium bicarbonate tablets titrated up to a maximum of 3 g bd (6 g total) in intervention group for 12 weeks versus no treatment in the control group. Outcomes compared intervention versus non-intervention phases in the treated group and equivalent time points in the control group: pre- and post-dialysis serum potassium; nutritional assessments: muscle mass and handgrip strength and electrocardiograms (ECGs) pre and post dialysis.

Results

Participants took an average of 3.7 ± 0.5 g sodium bicarbonate a day. In the intervention group, inter-dialytic potassium gain was reduced from 1.90 ± 0.60 to 1.69 ± 0.49 mmol/l (p = 0.032) and pre-dialysis potassium was reduced from 4.96 ± 0.62 to 4.79 ± 0.49 mmol/l without dietary change. Pre-dialysis bicarbonate increased from 18.15 ± 1.35 to 20.27 ± 1.88 mmol/l, however with an increase in blood pressure. Nutritionally, lean tissue mass was reduced in the controls suggesting less catabolism in the intervention group. There was no change in ECGs. Limitations are small sample size and unblinded study design lacking a placebo, with several participants failing to achieve the target of 22 mmol/l serum bicarbonate levels due mainly to tablet burden.

Conclusion

Oral sodium bicarbonate reduced bicarbonate loss and potassium gain in the inter-dialytic period, and may also preserve lean tissue mass.

Trial registration

The study was registered prospectively on 06/08/2015 with EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT number 2015-001439-20.

Sudden cardiac death in dialysis patients: different causes and management strategies

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) represents a major cause of death in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The precise estimate of its incidence is difficult to establish because studies on the incidence of SCD in ESKD are often combined with those related to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) occurring during a haemodialysis (HD) session. The aim of the European Dialysis Working Group of ERA-EDTA was to critically review the current literature examining the causes of extradialysis SCD and intradialysis SCA in ESKD patients and potential management strategies to reduce the incidence of such events. Extradialysis SCD and intradialysis SCA represent different clinical situations and should be kept distinct. Regarding the problem, numerically less relevant, of patients affected by intradialysis SCA, some modifiable risk factors have been identified, such as a low concentration of potassium and calcium in the dialysate, and some advantages linked to the presence of automated external defibrillators in dialysis units have been documented. The problem of extra-dialysis SCD is more complex. A reduced left ventricular ejection fraction associated with SCD is present only in a minority of cases occurring in HD patients. This is the proof that SCD occurring in ESKD has different characteristics compared with SCD occurring in patients with ischaemic heart disease and/or heart failure and not affected by ESKD. Recent evidence suggests that the fatal arrhythmia in this population may be due more frequently to bradyarrhythmias than to tachyarrhythmias. This fact may partly explain why several studies could not demonstrate an advantage of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in preventing SCD in ESKD patients. Electrolyte imbalances, frequently present in HD patients, could explain part of the arrhythmic phenomena, as suggested by the relationship between SCD and timing of the HD session. However, the high incidence of SCD in patients on peritoneal dialysis suggests that other risk factors due to cardiac comorbidities and uraemia per se may contribute to sudden mortality in ESKD patients.

Dialysis-Induced Cardiovascular and Multiorgan Morbidity

Hemodialysis has saved many lives, albeit with significant residual mortality. Although poor outcomes may reflect advanced age and comorbid conditions, hemodialysis per se may harm patients, contributing to morbidity and perhaps mortality. Systemic circulatory "stress" resulting from hemodialysis treatment schedule may act as a disease modifier, resulting in a multiorgan injury superimposed on preexistent comorbidities. New functional intradialytic imaging (i.e., echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and kinetic of specific cardiac biomarkers (i.e., Troponin I) have clearly documented this additional source of end-organ damage. In this context, several factors resulting from patient-hemodialysis interaction and/or patient management have been identified. Intradialytic hypovolemia, hypotensive episodes, hypoxemia, solutes, and electrolyte fluxes as well as cardiac arrhythmias are among the contributing factors to systemic circulatory stress that are induced by hemodialysis. Additionally, these factors contribute to patients' symptom burden, impair cognitive function, and finally have a negative impact on patients' perception and quality of life. In this review, we summarize the adverse systemic effects of current intermittent hemodialysis therapy, their pathophysiologic consequences, review the evidence for interventions that are cardioprotective, and explore new approaches that may further reduce the systemic burden of hemodialysis. These include improved biocompatible materials, smart dialysis machines that automatically may control the fluxes of solutes and electrolytes, volume and hemodynamic control, health trackers, and potentially disruptive technologies facilitating a more personalized medicine approach.

Optimization of dialysate bicarbonate in patients treated with online haemodiafiltration

Background

Metabolic acidosis is a common problem in haemodialysis patients, but acidosis overcorrection has been associated with higher mortality. There is no clear definition of the optimal serum bicarbonate target or dialysate bicarbonate. This study analysed the impact of reducing dialysate bicarbonate from 35 to 32 mEq/L on plasma bicarbonate levels in a cohort of patients treated with online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF).

Methods

We performed a prospective cohort study with patients in a stable chronic OL-HDF programme for at least 12 months in the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. We analysed pre- and post-dialysis total carbon dioxide(TCO₂₎ before and after dialysate bicarbonate reduction from 35 to 32 mEq/L, as well as the number of patients with a pre- and post-dialysis TCO₂ within 19–25 and ≤29 mEq/L, respectively, after the bicarbonate modification. Changes in serum sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorous and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were also assessed.

Results

We included 84 patients with a 6-month follow-up. At 6 months, pre- and post-dialysis TCO₂ significantly decreased (26.78 ± 1.26 at baseline to 23.69 ± 1.92 mEq/L and 31.91 ± 0.91 to 27.58 ± 1.36 mEq/L, respectively). The number of patients with a pre-dialysis TCO₂ >25 mEq/L was significantly reduced from 80 (90.5%) to 17 (20.2%) and for post-dialysis TCO₂  >29 mEq/L this number was reduced from 83 (98.8%) to 9 (10.7%). PTH significantly decreased from 226.09 (range 172–296) to 182.50 (125–239)  pg/mL at 6 months (P < 0.05) and post-dialysis potassium decreased from 3.16 ± 0.30 to 2.95 ± 0.48 mEq/L at 6 months (P < 0.05). Sodium, pre-dialysis potassium, calcium and phosphorous did not change significantly.

Conclusions

Reducing dialysate bicarbonate concentration by 3 mEq/L significantly and safely decreased pre- and post-dialysis TCO₂, avoiding acidosis overcorrection and improving secondary hyperparathyroidism control. An individualized bicarbonate prescription (a key factor in the adequate control of acidosis) according to pre-dialysis TCO₂ is suggested based on these results.

Serum Bicarbonate as a Surrogate for pH in Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study

Rationale & Objective

Excess morbidity and mortality are associated with both high and low serum bicarbonate levels in epidemiologic studies of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving hemodialysis. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) recommends modifying dialysate bicarbonate concentration to achieve a predialysis serum bicarbonate level ≥ 22 mmol/L, measured as total carbon dioxide (CO₂). This practice assumes that total CO₂ is an adequate surrogate for acid-base status, yet its surrogacy performance is unknown in ESKD. We determined acid-base status at the beginning and end of hemodialysis using total CO₂ and pH and tested whether total CO₂ is an appropriate surrogate for acid-base status.

Study Design

Pilot study.

Setting & Participants

25 veterans with ESKD receiving outpatient hemodialysis.

Tests Compared

pH, calculated bicarbonate level, and total CO₂.

Outcomes

The proportion of paired samples for which total CO₂ misclassified acid-base status according to pH was determined. Bias of total CO₂ was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots, comparing it to calculated bicarbonate.

Results

Among 71 samples, mean pH was 7.41 ± 0.03 predialysis and 7.48 ± 0.05 postdialysis. Compared with interpretation of full blood gas profiles, 9 of 25 (36%) participants were misclassified as acidemic using predialysis total CO₂ measures alone (total CO₂ < 22 mmol/L but pH ≥ 7.38); 1 (4%) participant was misclassified as alkalemic (total CO₂ > 26 mmol/L but pH ≤ 7.42). Among paired samples in which predialysis total CO₂ was < 22 mmol/L, the corresponding pH was acidemic (< 7.38) in just 3 of 13 (23%) instances.

Limitations

Small, single-center, entirely male cohort.

Conclusions

A majority of participants became alkalemic during routine hemodialysis despite arriving with normal pH. 10 of 25 (40%) participants' acid-base status was misclassified using total CO₂ measurements alone; the majority of predialysis total CO₂ values that would trigger therapeutic modification according to practice guidelines did not have acidemia when assessed using pH. Efforts to improve dialysis prescription require recognition that total CO₂ may not be reliable for interpreting acid-base status in hemodialysis patients.