1
|
Goodwill JR, Taylor HO. Measuring Whether Gratitude and Loneliness Mediate the Link Between Non-organizational Religiosity and Suicidal Ideation: Evidence From Black Adults During COVID-19. Public Health Rep 2025:333549251314665. [PMID: 40296509 PMCID: PMC12040851 DOI: 10.1177/00333549251314665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Suicides among Black adults in the United States increased nationally during the COVID-19 pandemic, although limited empirical evidence documents the pathways that explain how suicide risk may develop in this population. We examined experiences of non-organizational religious involvement, gratitude, and loneliness and their relation to suicidal ideation among Black adults in the United States. METHODS We analyzed data from a probability-based sample of 995 Black adults in the United States who completed online surveys from April through June 2022. We recruited participants from the AmeriSpeak panel at the National Opinion Research Center. We applied structural equation modeling techniques to measure direct and indirect associations among religiosity, positive psychology, and mental health variables. We tested whether non-organizational religiosity was indirectly associated with suicidal ideation via feelings of gratitude and COVID-19-specific forms of loneliness during the pandemic. RESULTS The measurement model demonstrated a good fit to the data. Structural model results indicated that non-organizational religious involvement was positively related to gratitude (β = 0.51; P < .001); in turn, feelings of gratitude were associated with reduced suicidal ideation (β = -0.12; P = .02). Moreover, COVID-19-specific forms of loneliness were positively associated with past-year suicidal ideation (β = 0.11; P = .01). Non-organizational religious involvement, however, was not directly associated with feelings of COVID-19-related loneliness or suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS Public health officials should account for feelings of gratitude and loneliness as mechanisms that can be leveraged to inform the development of evidence-based suicide prevention interventions for Black adults during public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janelle R. Goodwill
- Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Harry O. Taylor
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bui DP, Niederhausen M, Hickok AW, Govier DJ, Rowneki M, Naylor JC, Hawkins E, Boyko EJ, Iwashyna TJ, Viglianti EM, Ioannou GN, Chen JI, Hynes DM. Veterans at High Risk for Post-COVID-19 Suicide Attempts or Other Self-Directed Violence. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e250061. [PMID: 40036032 PMCID: PMC11880954 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance US veterans have a higher risk of suicide than the general civilian population. Research suggests that COVID-19 infection is associated with increased risk of suicide attempts or other forms of self-directed violence (SDV) among veterans. Objective To identify subgroups of veterans with high risk of post-COVID-19 suicide attempts or SDV. Design, Setting, and Participants This is a retrospective cohort study conducted using data from the Veteran Health Administration (VHA). Participants included VHA enrollees with a first case of COVID-19 between May 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022, residing in the 50 states or Washington, DC. Exposure COVID-19 infection. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was a suicide attempt or SDV 12 months after COVID-19 infection. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups. Outcome rates and 95% CIs per 10 000 veterans were calculated. Multinomial regressions were used to model outcome risk and marginal risk ratios with 99.5% CIs to compare outcome risk across latent classes. Results The cohort included 285 235 veterans with COVID-19 and was predominantly male (248 118 veterans [87.0%]) and younger than 65 years (171 636 veterans [60.2%]). Chronic pain (152 788 veterans [53.6%]), depression (98 093 veterans [34.4%]), and posttraumatic stress disorder (79 462 veterans [27.9%]) diagnoses were common. The 12-month outcome rate was 73.8 events per 10 000 (95% CI, 70.7-77.0 events per 10 000). Two latent classes with high rates of suicide attempt or SDV were identified. The first high-risk subgroup (46 693 veterans [16.4%]) was older (34 472 veterans [73.8%] aged ≥65 years) and had a high prevalence of physical conditions (43 329 veterans [92.8%] had hypertension, and 36 824 veterans [78.9%] had chronic pain); the 12-month outcome rate was 103.7 events per 10 000 (95% CI, 94.7-113.3 events per 10 000). The second high-risk subgroup (82 309 veterans [28.9%]) was generally younger (68 822 veterans [83.6%] aged <65 years) with a lower prevalence of physical conditions but high prevalence of mental health conditions (61 367 veterans [74.6%] had depression, and 50 073 veterans [60.8%] had posttraumatic stress disorder); the 12-month outcome rate was 162.9 events per 10 000 (95% CI, 154.5-171.8 events per 10 000), and compared with the lowest risk subgroup, the 12-month risk of suicide attempts or SDV was 14 times higher in this subgroup (risk ratio, 14.23; 99.5% CI, 10.22-19.80). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of veterans with COVID-19, 2 veteran subgroups with distinct health profiles had high rates of suicide attempts and SDV, suggesting that different groups may require different approaches to suicide prevention after COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. Bui
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Meike Niederhausen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
- Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Alex W. Hickok
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Diana J. Govier
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
- Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Mazhgan Rowneki
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jennifer C. Naylor
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- VISN 6 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Durham Veteran Administration Health Care Services, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric Hawkins
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, Washington
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Edward J. Boyko
- Seattle Epidemiologic Research Information Center, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, Washington
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elizabeth M. Viglianti
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - George N. Ioannou
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound HCS, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jason I. Chen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Denise M. Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
- College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis
- Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saulnier KG, Bagge CL, Ganoczy D, Bahraini NH, Jagusch J, Hosanagar A, Ilgen MA, Pfeiffer PN. Suicide Risk Evaluations and Suicide in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e2461559. [PMID: 39998832 PMCID: PMC11862973 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented the Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) in 2019 to standardize suicide risk assessment across the health care system. Identifying CSRE responses associated with suicide could inform risk management and prevent suicide. Objective To identify CSRE responses associated with subsequent suicide. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study examines acute (within 30 days) and chronic (within 365 days) suicide risk after 269 374 CSREs were administered. Participants included US VHA patients undergoing CSRE evaluation between November 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Data collection and analysis were performed from April 5 to August 20, 2024. Exposures CSRE responses, including suicidal ideation, behaviors, warning signs, risk factors, and protective factors. Main Outcome and Measure Suicide per death certificate data from the Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense Mortality Data Repository. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results A total of 153 736 patients with 269 374 valid CSREs (86.26% male; mean [SD] age, 50.48 [15.26] years) were included in the multivariable-adjusted analyses of suicide. Suicidal ideation (hazard ratio [HR], 3.14; 95% CI, 1.51-6.54), firearm access (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.49-4.61), making preparations for a suicide attempt (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.27-3.62), seeking access to lethal means (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.11-3.75), anxiety (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.81), and psychiatric hospitalization history (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02-2.61) were associated with increased suicide risk within 30 days, whereas anger (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.85) was associated with decreased risk. Suicidal ideation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.20-2.21), firearm access (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13), making preparations for a suicide attempt (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.09-2.23), reckless behaviors (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.00-1.95), and history of psychiatric hospitalization (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.32-2.13) were associated with increased suicide risk within 365 days, whereas anger (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.71), preexisting risk factors (eg, trauma; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96), and recent transition from the military (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70) were associated with decreased risk in multivariable-adjusted analyses. Suicide risk within 365 days was elevated among patients identified by clinicians to be at intermediate acute risk (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.71), intermediate chronic risk (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77), and high chronic risk (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.22-2.47) of suicide compared with patients at low risk in multivariable-adjusted analyses. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of suicide following risk assessments, findings suggest that only a few constructs are associated with subsequent suicide, particularly suicidal ideation, firearm access, and preparatory behaviors. Developing risk prediction algorithms including CSRE responses may enhance clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin G. Saulnier
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center, Office of Mental Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Systems Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Courtney L. Bagge
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Systems Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dara Ganoczy
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Systems Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nazanin H. Bahraini
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora
- Department of Psychiatry, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora
| | - Jennifer Jagusch
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Systems Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Avinash Hosanagar
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Ann Arbor VA Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mark A. Ilgen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Systems Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Paul N. Pfeiffer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Systems Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baker JC, Cacace S, Cramer RJ, Rasmussen S, Martin C, May AM, Thomsen C, Bryan AO, Bryan CJ. Entrapment in the military context: Factor structure and associations with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2024; 54:1006-1028. [PMID: 39135471 PMCID: PMC11629605 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.13105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved understanding of how US service members transition from chronic/baseline to acute suicide risk is warranted. One such model, the Integrated Motivational Volitional Model of Suicide, posits entrapment as central to this process. However, entrapment has not been extensively investigated within military populations. METHODS This study examines the factor structure, reliability, and predictive validity of the Entrapment Scale (E-Scale) within a military population. Exploratory structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis compared one- versus two-factor structures of the E-Scale. Autoregressive SEM assessed if E-Scale scores predicted suicidal ideation and suicide attempt likelihood at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and examined whether the impact of entrapment was moderated by social support (i.e., appraisal, tangible, and belonging). RESULTS Results favored a two-factor solution (external and internal) of entrapment. The relationship between entrapment and suicide outcomes was moderated by perceived social support but in unexpected directions. Unexpectedly, social support strengthened the relationship between external entrapment and suicide outcomes for most models. Only tangible support moderated the relationship between internal entrapment (IE) and suicide outcomes as predicted. CONCLUSIONS IE is linked with suicidal ideation in the short-term, whereas external entrapments relationship with suicide outcomes may reflect more persistent social challenges for military members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sam Cacace
- University of North CarolinaCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bergmans RS, Yu C, Yalavarthi B, Xiao LZ, Wegryn-Jones R, Summerville J, Rajgarhia S, Kurtz V, Dell'Imperio S, Bohnert ASB, Boehnke KF. How Veterans with Chronic Pain Approach Using Cannabis for Symptom Management: Results from a Qualitative Interpretive Description Study. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2024. [PMID: 39582441 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Veterans use cannabis as a chronic pain treatment due to a combination of the easing of restrictions and dissatisfaction with care standards. The segregation of medical cannabis from conventional health systems may translate to opportunities and disadvantages that are not well defined. Our study aimed to characterize how Veterans with chronic pain approach using cannabis for symptom management, including product access, developing a treatment plan, and its integration into daily life. Materials and Methods: We used an interpretive description design and conducted semi-structured interviews with U.S. Veterans in Michigan who had chronic pain; were aged 21 years or older; and (a) used cannabis, (b) were planning to use cannabis, or (c) interested in learning about how cannabis could help with pain. We analyzed deidentified interview transcripts to develop themes that focused on how Veterans approached new and continued use of cannabis for chronic pain management. Results: Participants were Veterans with chronic pain, median age = 50 years (n = 32). Participants described how factors at the individual, relationship, community, and societal levels influenced their interest in and use of cannabis for chronic pain. We identified five main themes: (1) cannabis supports holistic wellness, but there are also undesired effects; (2) medical cannabis requires a personalized treatment approach; (3) Veterans seek expanded access to medical cannabis and more assurance regarding product safety and efficacy; (4) sociopolitical attitudes and advocacy shape medical cannabis acceptability; and (5) the interest in research to inform treatment approaches and facilitate access. Discussion: This article illustrates how Veterans approached using cannabis for chronic pain management. Findings illuminate the potential value of cannabis for Veterans with chronic pain while also highlighting numerous obstacles and limitations related to its use. There are opportunities for health care providers to support Veterans who are interested in cannabis while research regarding efficacy and safety continues. Future efforts should engage Veterans to collectively work toward a better understanding of cannabis as a pain treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel S Bergmans
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Christine Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Bhaavna Yalavarthi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lillian Z Xiao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Riley Wegryn-Jones
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Johari Summerville
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sia Rajgarhia
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Vivian Kurtz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Samantha Dell'Imperio
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Amy S B Bohnert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Kevin F Boehnke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Psychedelic Center, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monteith LL, Kittel J, Miller C, Schneider AL, Holliday R, Gaeddert LA, Spark T, Brenner LA, Hoffmire CA. Identifying U.S. regions with the highest suicide rates and examining differences in suicide methods among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Veterans. Asian J Psychiatr 2023; 89:103797. [PMID: 37847965 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
The suicide rate among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) Veterans increased from 2001 to 2020. Identifying regions where suicide rates are elevated and increasing among AANHPI Veterans would inform targeted prevention efforts for members of this cohort. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 377,833 AANHPI Veterans to examine suicide rates and methods (2005-2019) by United States (US) region and over time (2005-2009, 2010-2014, 2015-2019), using US Veteran Eligibility Trends and Statistics and Joint DoD/VA Mortality Data Repository data. AANHPI Veterans across most regions experienced increases in suicide rates from the earliest to latest period; however, patterns differed by region. Age-adjusted suicide rates increased across all three periods among those in the Northeast and West, but increased, then declined in the Midwest and South. In 2015-2019, the age-adjusted suicide rate among AANHPI Veterans was highest in the Northeast (42.0 per 100,000) and lowest in the West (27.5). However, the highest percentages of AANHPI Veteran suicide deaths in 2005-2019 occurred in the West (39.5%) and South (34.7%), with lower percentages in the Midwest (15.0%) and Northeast (10.8%). Across regions, those ages 18-34 had the highest suicide rates. Firearms were the most frequently used suicide method across regions (44.4%-60.2%), except the Northeast (35.2%), where suffocation was more common (38.3%). Results suggest particular needs for suicide prevention efforts among AANHPI Veterans in the Northeast and to ensure that lethal means safety initiatives for AANHPI Veterans encompass both firearms and suffocation, with some variations in emphasis across regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey L Monteith
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1890 N Revere Ct, Suite 4003, Mail Stop F546, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Firearm Injury Prevention Initiative, 12401 East 17th Avenue, 7th Floor, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Julie Kittel
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Christin Miller
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Alexandra L Schneider
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Ryan Holliday
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1890 N Revere Ct, Suite 4003, Mail Stop F546, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Laurel A Gaeddert
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Talia Spark
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Lisa A Brenner
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1890 N Revere Ct, Suite 4003, Mail Stop F546, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Claire A Hoffmire
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, 1700 North Wheeling St., Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nichter B, Koller D, De Angelis F, Wang J, Girgenti MJ, Na PJ, Hill ML, Norman SB, Krystal JH, Gelernter J, Polimanti R, Pietrzak RH. Genetic liability to suicidal thoughts and behaviors and risk of suicide attempt in US military veterans: moderating effects of cumulative trauma burden. Psychol Med 2023; 53:6325-6333. [PMID: 36444557 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291722003646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about environmental factors that may influence associations between genetic liability to suicidality and suicidal behavior. METHODS This study examined whether a suicidality polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from a large genome-wide association study (N = 122,935) was associated with suicide attempts in a population-based sample of European-American US military veterans (N = 1664; 92.5% male), and whether cumulative lifetime trauma exposure moderated this association. RESULTS Eighty-five veterans (weighted 6.3%) reported a history of suicide attempt. After adjusting for sociodemographic and psychiatric characteristics, suicidality PRS was associated with lifetime suicide attempt (odds ratio 2.65; 95% CI 1.37-5.11). A significant suicidality PRS-by-trauma exposure interaction emerged, such that veterans with higher levels of suicidality PRS and greater trauma burden had the highest probability of lifetime suicide attempt (16.6%), whereas the probability of attempts was substantially lower among those with high suicidality PRS and low trauma exposure (1.4%). The PRS-by-trauma interaction effect was enriched for genes implicated in cellular and developmental processes, and nervous system development, with variants annotated to the DAB2 and SPNS2 genes, which are implicated in inflammatory processes. Drug repurposing analyses revealed upregulation of suicide gene-sets in the context of medrysone, a drug targeting chronic inflammation, and clofibrate, a triacylglyceride level lowering agent. CONCLUSION Results suggest that genetic liability to suicidality is associated with increased risk of suicide attempt among veterans, particularly in the presence of high levels of cumulative trauma exposure. Additional research is warranted to investigate whether incorporation of genomic information may improve suicide prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Nichter
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Dora Koller
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Flavio De Angelis
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jiawei Wang
- Computational Biology & Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew J Girgenti
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- National Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Peter J Na
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- National Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Melanie L Hill
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sonya B Norman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
- National Center for PTSD, White River Junction, VT, USA
| | - John H Krystal
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- National Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joel Gelernter
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- National Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Renato Polimanti
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Robert H Pietrzak
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- National Center for PTSD, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laliberte AZ, Salvi A, Hooker E, Roth B, Handley R, Carlson K, Hynes D, Tuepker A, Chen JI. Factors associated with a lack of health care utilization among Veterans after a positive suicide screen in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2023; 30:321-330. [PMID: 36786953 PMCID: PMC11081519 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many Veterans at high risk for suicide are identified in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) emergency departments (ED). Little is known about what may predict care utilization in this population. To address this knowledge gap, we explored factors associated with Veterans' lack of VHA care utilization following a positive suicide risk screen in the ED. METHODS In a retrospective observational study, we identified all patients who were seen in a VHA ED from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020. We examined factors associated with not utilizing VHA mental health (MH) and all VHA care in the 6 months following a positive suicide ED screen. Predictors included comorbidity, homelessness, and MH visit and diagnosis history. RESULTS We identified 23,446 Veterans with a positive suicide risk screen in the ED in fiscal year 2020. Overall, 4.1% had no VHA MH visits 6 months postscreen. The probability of not utilizing MH care was significantly higher for Veterans with no comorbidity (4.7% vs. 3.4% for mild comorbidity), no MH diagnosis (10.5% vs 2.8%), no past-year MH visits (13.6% vs 2.3%), and no past-year homelessness (5.4% vs. 1.1%). A smaller proportion of the population did not receive any VHA care 6 months postscreen (0.5%). Veterans who did not experience homelessness (0.6% vs 0.2%), had no MH diagnosis (1.6% vs. 0.3%), and had no previous MH visits (1.9% vs 0.2%) were significantly more likely to not utilize VHA care. CONCLUSIONS Veterans who do not utilize VHA care after a positive suicide risk screen appear to have fewer documented health and housing concerns than those who do receive care. Yet, Veterans with a positive suicide risk screen who are otherwise healthy may remain at elevated risk for suicide following their ED visit. ED providers may consider enhanced follow-up care to mitigate suicide risk for these Veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery Z. Laliberte
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Apoorva Salvi
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
- Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elizabeth Hooker
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Brandon Roth
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
- Portland VA Research Foundation, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Robert Handley
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kathleen Carlson
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
- Oregon Health & Science University–Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Denise Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
- Health Management and Policy, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Anaïs Tuepker
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jason I. Chen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mental Health in the Time of Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Nurse Pract 2022; 18:957-961. [PMID: 35855299 PMCID: PMC9283604 DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Certain life experiences can have a profound effect on human emotions. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients are reporting mood disturbances at much higher levels. Multiple encounters with real and imagined threat, prolonged isolation, and loss of control have adversely impacted the country’s behavioral health. However, most people will not pursue psychological care when needed, and some who pursue it will be unable to access it. Nurse practitioners and other health care professionals are in an optimal position to help. Psychological research explains some of what is driving this phenomenon and offers suggestions of benefit to patients, families, and colleagues.
Collapse
|