The structural validity of the IKDC and its relationship with quality of life following ACL reconstruction

Improved hamstring strength and knee position sense are associated with enhanced landing mechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Return-to-sport decisions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rely on diverse criteria, including neuromuscular performances and functional testing. This study investigates the relationships between neuromuscular parameters, specifically angle-specific strength and proprioception, and knee kinematics during the landing phase of a single-leg hop task in patients 6-12 months post-ACLR.

METHODS

This cohort study included 25 participants (44% women; mean age 28 ± 10 years) who underwent primary ACLR. Demographic and surgical data were collected at 6 weeks postoperatively. Follow-up testing at a mean 8 months post-ACLR included isokinetic assessments of knee extensor and flexor strength to measure peak torques and angle-specific torques, as well as evaluations of position sense. Functional performance was assessed via the single hop for distance (SHD) test, with kinematic analysis of knee flexion during landing. Landing quality was evaluated using the SHD Landing Error Scoring System (SHD-LESS) scale. Multivariate models explored the associations between limb dominance, strength, proprioception and knee kinematics during landing. Correlations between landing quality and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including psychological readiness and self-reported function, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The operated limb exhibited significantly lower strength in knee flexors (p<0.050) and extensors (p<0.001), with the largest deficits observed in angle-specific extensor torque (effect size d > -0.9). No significant limb differences were found in position sense. The operated limb achieved shorter SHD distances (p=0.001) and showed reduced knee flexion at initial contact (p=0.009) and total flexion during landing (p=0.002). Limb dominance influenced initial knee flexion (p=0.018). Greater hamstring strength (p=0.013) and improved position sense (p=0.002) were associated with increased knee flexion during landing. Poor landing mechanics, reflected by SHD-LESS scores, were correlated with impaired position sense (p=0.004) and worse PROMs (p<0.050).

CONCLUSION

Enhancing hamstring strength and position sense may reduce bilateral kinematic discrepancies and improve landing control after ACLR. Limb dominance influences symmetrical kinematics at initial contact. Asymmetrical landing is associated with poorer PROMs, highlighting the importance of assessing both neuromuscular control and functional performances in rehabilitation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06524869 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Non-Anatomic Reconstruction in Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Functional Approach

Background/Objectives: Multiligament knee injuries, involving damage to multiple stabilizing structures, present a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery, often resulting in knee instability and compromised function. While anatomic ligament reconstruction has been traditionally advocated, non-anatomic techniques may provide effective alternatives, particularly for patients with moderate functional demands who do not require high-level athletic performance. Material and methods: In this study, we assessed the outcomes of a non-anatomic, hybrid surgical approach involving combined arthroscopic and open non-anatomic ligament reconstruction in 60 patients with multiligament knee injuries. Using simplified reconstruction methods for the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL), we tailored the procedures to the needs of active, non-professional patients. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Questionnaire, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results: Postoperative improvements were significant, with the total IKDC score increasing from a median of 39.1 preoperatively to 75.9 postoperatively, Lysholm from 61.0 to 87.0, and KOOS from 47.6 to 85.7 (p < 0.01). The results demonstrated significant improvements across all scoring systems, with enhanced knee stability, reduced pain, and better quality of life. Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of non-anatomic reconstructions as a practical solution for patients seeking a return to daily activities and recreational sports without the complexity of full anatomic reconstruction.

A simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question can be used for a quick assessment of patients undergoing knee surgery

PURPOSE

The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) is the cornerstone of clinical research for surgical disciplines, but the use in daily routine can be challenging. One of the most widespread PROMS in knee surgery is the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the potential correlation of the IKDC score with a patient's subjective assessment of the knee using a single question. We hypothesized a correlation between the IKDC score and single question score.

METHODS

A prospective, single center study in a comprehensive knee outpatient clinic was performed. Patients willing to participate, presenting in the clinic for the first time were asked to complete the IKDC questionnaire and to answer the question: "How does your knee know compare to when you were 16 years old, in percentage?" Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression were used to analyze the IKDC score and the single-question percentage.

RESULTS

After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 310 patients were included. The mean age of the participants was 43.3 ± 9.6 years, and 45.2% of the patients were female. Mean IKDC score was 41.11 ± 13.13, compared to the mean score of the single-question 40.90 ± 22.7 (p = 0.887). The correlation between the IKDC score and the single-question was significant (p < 0.001), however, the person coefficient was 0.460, indicating moderate correlation. The linear regression analysis was also statistically significant (p < 0.001), but with a model fitness of r2 = 0.211 and B = 0.266. From the 310 patients, 305 (98.4%) found the single-question of more relevance than the IKDC score.

CONCLUSION

IKDC score and a simple, subjective, knee self-evaluation using a single question demonstrate moderate correlation. The single question can be used for better understanding of discrepancy between the objective score and the patients' subjective perception of knee function or as a fast, single question proxy score.

The role of psychological resilience and aggression in injury prevention among martial arts athletes

Introduction

For martial artists, the ability to manage reactions in the face of adversity and bounce back after a stressful event can have major impact on performance. The scope of the research is to investigate martial artists' level of resilience and aggression (Go-ahead, Foul play, and Assertiveness factors), what is specific to athletes and who have suffered from moderate and/or severe injuries (in terms of resilience and three factors of aggression examined), and test the possibility that a psychological variable under investigation can predict athletes' injury severity.

Materials and methods

A total sample of 154 athletes from striking combat sports-SC (karate, taekwondo, kickboxing, and boxing), grappling combat sports-GC (judo and BJJ), and mixed martial artists (MMA) participated in the research. For assessing resilience, the Romanian adaptation of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was used, and for aggression, the Romanian adaptation of Makarowski's Sports Aggression Questionnaire was used. An injury report form was also created and applied to athletes.

Results

The post-hoc tests (after running a single-factor multivariate analysis of variance) revealed significant differences for resilience and Foul (violent) play between the sports disciplines analyzed. A significant positive correlation was found between athletes' injury severity and assertiveness in SC and between injury severity and resilience in GC. Through the t-test for independent samples, it was highlighted that the average value for Foul (violent) play is significantly higher in athletes who have suffered mild, moderate, and/or severe injuries compared with martial arts athletes who have suffered from only mild/minor injuries. A binomial logistic regression was also performed to verify to what extent Foul play predicts athletes' injury severity.

Conclusion

A low level of Foul (violent) play is linked with a decreased likelihood of moderate and/or severe injuries in martial arts athletes. The study findings suggest that resilience, foul play, and assertiveness have an important role in injury prevention among martial artists.

International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form Latent Growth Model Analysis: Assessing Recovery Trajectories

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), such as the six-item International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-6), play a crucial role in assessing health conditions and guiding clinical decisions. Latent Growth Modeling (LGM) can be employed to understand recovery trajectories in patients post-operatively. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess LGM properties of the IKDC-6 in patients with knee pathologies that require surgical intervention and to assess differences between subgroups (i.e., sex and age). A cross-sectional study was conducted using the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) database with patients who had undergone knee arthroscopy. Our results found that preoperative scores did not influence the rate of change overtime. Perceived knee health improved over time, with varying rates among individuals. The adolescent age subgroup and male subgroup exhibited faster recovery rates compared to the older age subgroup and female subgroup. While initial hypotheses suggested IKDC-6 could serve as a prognostic tool, results did not support this. However, results indicated favorable outcomes irrespective of preoperative perceived knee impairment levels. This study provides valuable insights into recovery dynamics following knee surgery, emphasizing the need for personalized rehabilitation strategies tailored to individual patient characteristics.

Study on the use of 3D printed guides in the individualized reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the accuracy and effectiveness of 3D printed guides to assist femoral tunnel preparation in individualised reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

METHODS

Sixty patients who attended the Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College for autologous hamstring single bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament from October 2018 to October 2020 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, including 31 cases in the 3D printing group (14 males and 17 females, mean age 41.94 ± 10.15 years) and 29 cases in the control group (13 males and 16 females, mean age 37.76 ± 10.34 years). Patients in both groups were assessed for intraoperative femoral tunnel accuracy, the number of intraoperative positioning and the time taken to prepare the femoral tunnel, the length of the anteromedial approach incision, the pre-planned bone tunnel length and intraoperative bone tunnel length in the 3D printed group, IKDC score and Lysholm score preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the Lachman、pivot-shift test preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively, gait analysis to assess internal and external rotation in flexion of the knee at 12 months postoperatively and postoperative complications in both groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in functional knee scores and anteromedial approach incision length between the 3D printed and control groups (p > 0.05), while there was a statistical difference in the accuracy of tunnel positioning, the time taken to prepare the femoral bone tunnel and the degree of external rotation of the knee in flexion between the two groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the preoperative planning of the bone tunnel length and the intraoperative bone tunnel length (p > 0.05).

COMPLICATIONS

One case in the 3D printing group developed intermuscular vein thrombosis in the affected lower limb after surgery, which disappeared after treatment, while three cases in the control group developed intermuscular vein thrombosis in the affected lower limb. No complications such as bone tunnel rupture, deep vein thrombosis in the lower limb and infection occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

3D printed guides assisted with individualized ACL reconstruction may improve the accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning, which is safe and effective, while reducing the operative time and the number of intraoperative positioning, without increasing the length of incision, and may obtain higher functional scores and rotational stability of the knee joint, which is in line with the concept of individualized ACL reconstruction.

The Significance of Selecting an Appropriate Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM): A Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Specific Paediatric International Documentation Committee Subjective (Pedi-IKDC) Knee Form

INTRODUCTION

The selection of an appropriate PROM is a crucial aspect in assessing outcomes. Questionnaires that have not been designed or validated for a paediatric population are routinely used. Using a questionnaire requires translation, cultural adaptation, and testing the psychometric properties of the translated questionnaire. There is no applicable questionnaire in our country for children with knee-specific conditions in sports orthopaedics. Therefore, this study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and assess the psychometric properties of the Paediatric IKDC (Pedi-IKDC) questionnaire within the Lithuanian paediatric population.

METHODS

The translation was conducted in accordance with international standards. Patients aged 11-17 years with various knee disorders participated in three surveys and completed the Pedi-IKDC, Lysholm, and PedsQL questionnaires. Interviews with patients following the translation process, in addition to floor and ceiling effects, were used to assess content validity. Cronbach alpha (α) statistics and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied to measure internal consistency and reproducibility, respectively. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were calculated to assess reliability. Pearson correlations were calculated between Pedi-IKDC and Lysholm PedsQL scores to determine criteria validity. The effect size (ES) and standardised response mean (SRM) were calculated to assess the responsiveness to change.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha (α) was 0.91 for the total score, 0.75 for symptoms, and 0.92 for the sport/function component. The ICC for overall scores was 0.98, with each question ranging from 0.87 to 0.98. The SEM was 2.97, and the SDC was 8.23. Lysholm and PedsQL physical functioning domain scores had moderate correlations (0.8 > r > 0.5), and the overall PedsQL score had a weak correlation (0.5 > r > 0.2) to the Pedi-IKDC score. The floor and ceiling effects were 3.3% and 1.6%, respectively. The SRM was 1.72 and the ES was 1.98.

CONCLUSIONS

The Lithuanian Pedi-IKDC version is an appropriate evaluation instrument for assessing outcomes in children with knee disorders. All of the psychometric features produced acceptable results.

A bifactor model supports unidimensionality of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in young active patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears: a retrospective analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) is the most highly recommended patient reported outcome measure for assessing patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and those undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. The IKDC was developed as a unidimensional instrument for a variety of knee conditions. Structural validity, which determines how an instrument is scored, has not been definitively confirmed for the IKDC in respondents with ACL injuries, and in fact an alternative two-factor/subscale structure has been proposed in this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate structure and scoring system for the IKDC in young active patients following ACL injury.

METHODS

In total, 618 young patients deemed at high risk of graft rupture were randomized into the Stability 1 trial. Of the trial participants, 606 patients (98%) completed a baseline IKDC questionnaire used for this analysis. A cross sectional retrospective secondary data analysis of the Stability 1 baseline IKDC data was completed to assess the structural validity of the IKDC using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Factor analyses were used to test model fit of the intended one-factor structure, a two-factor structure, and alternative four-factor and bifactor structures (i.e., a combination of a unidimensional factor with additional specific factors) of the IKDC, in a dataset of young active ACL patients.

RESULTS

The simple one-factor and two-factor structures of the IKDC displayed inadequate fit in our dataset of young ACL patients. A bifactor model provided the best fit. This model contains one general factor that is substantially associated with all items, plus four secondary, more specific content factors (symptoms, activity level, activities of daily living, and sport) with generally weaker associations to subsets of items. Although the single-factor model did not provide unambiguous support to unidimensionality of the IKDC based on fit indices, the bifactor model supports unidimensionality of the IKDC when covariance between items with similar linguistic structure, response options, or content are acknowledged.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, findings of a bifactor model with evidence of a reliable general factor well defined by all items lends support to continue interpreting and scoring this instrument as unidimensional. This should be confirmed in other samples. Clinically, based on these findings, the IKDC can be represented by a single score for young active patients with ACL tears. A more nuanced interpretation would also consider secondary factors such as sport and activity level.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Stability 1 trial for which these data were collected was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02018354).

Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in a Heterogeneous Sample of Post-Operative Patients

Background

The International Knee Document Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) is a patient-reported outcome measure used in orthopedics and sports medicine. Further psychometric assessment is necessary to confirm measurement properties in a large, heterogenous sample.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the IKDC-SKF in a large, heterogenous sample.

Study Design

Cross-Sectional Study.

Methods

An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a sound latent structure and to assess internal consistency in a large sample of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to confirm structural validity. Multi-group invariance was conducted to assess factorial stability across sex and age groups, while longitudinal invariance procedures were performed to assess stability over time.

Results

A 3-factor, 9-item IKDC-SKF short form was identified with EFA procedures. The model was confirmed with CFA (CFI = 0.983; TLI = 0.975; IFI = 0.983; RMSEA = 0.057), while a sound 2-factor, 6-item model was also identified (CFI = 1.0; TLI = 0.999; IFI = 1.0; RMSEA = 0.11). The 9-item IKDC-SKF short form was invariant across groups but not time; removal of a single item (i.e., 8-item IKDC-SKF short form) resulted in longitudinal invariance. The 6-item IKDC-SKF short form was invariant across groups and time.

Conclusion

The 6-item, 8-item, and 9-item short form versions of the IKDC-SKF exceed contemporary fit recommendations and present as plausible alternatives to the IKDC-SKF with improved measurement properties, reduced scale response burden, and evidence of multi-group and longitudinal invariance. Further, the 6- and 8-item IKDC-SKF short forms may be used to assess group differences or change across time.# Level of evidence hereLevel 3©The Author(s).

A-trait and risk-taking behavior in predicting injury severity among martial arts athletes

Introduction

Trait anxiety (A-trait) can be seen as a multiplicative function of the person-situation interaction. Considering risk-taking behavior (R-TB), literature highlights instrumental and stimulating risk. The aim of the research is to investigate the level of A-trait (in physically dangerous conditions and in new, unusual situations) and the level of R-TB (instrumental and stimulating risk) in athletes, and to verify to what extent A-trait and risk-taking behavior predict injury severity.

Materials and methods

One hundred and fifty-four senior martial arts athletes from grappling combat sports, striking combat sports and mixed martial artists (MMA) participated in the study. For assessing trait anxiety and risk-taking behavior, the Romanian adaptation of the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales (EMAS), respectively the Romanian adaptation of the Makarowski's Stimulating and Instrumental Risk Questionnaire were used.

Results

Using multivariate analysis of variance, significant differences between athletes (according to the sports disciplines practiced), in terms of A-trait and R-TB, were examined. Next, we checked the existing correlations between injury severity, A-trait and R-TB scores in athletes practicing striking combat sports, grappling combat sports and MMA. To verify whether there are significant differences in terms of trait anxiety, stimulating and instrumental risk between athletes who have suffered mild, moderate and/or severe injuries and athletes who have suffered only minor/mild injuries, t-Test for Independent Samples was used. Binomial logistic regression procedures were, also, performed, predicting athletes' likelihood of injury, based on R-TB and A-trait.

Conclusion

A moderate or slightly below average level of anxiety in new, unusual situations and a higher level of instrumental risk are linked with a decreased likelihood of severe injuries in athletes. Martial arts athletes (in entire sample) who have suffered more severe injuries are more adrenaline-seeking in competition and use less rational thinking, taking more pleasure in just performing technical executions, regardless of the outcome.

The Relationship of Knee-related Quality of Life With Function, Psychological Factors, Strength, Performance, and Postural Stability After ACL Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have decreased health-related quality of life (QoL) compared with healthy control participants. Few studies have verified the predictors of QoL using Quality of Life Outcome Measure Questionnaire for Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency (ACL-QoL), and no study has verified the relationship of psychological factors and knee function with ACL-QoL in patients after ACLR.

HYPOTHESIS

Knee functional status, muscle strength, performance in hop tests, postural stability, and psychological factors would be the predictors of QoL after ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

METHODS

A total of 131 participants who had undergone ACLR at least 6 months previously were evaluated. QoL was assessed using ACL-QoL; knee functional status, using International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee (IKDC) and global rating scale (GRS); psychological readiness, using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI); kinesiophobia, using Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17); knee strength, using isokinetic dynamometer; performance, using single-leg hop tests; and postural stability, using Biodex Balance System. Pearson's linear correlation and stepwise hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were performed to verify the predictors of QoL.

RESULTS

ACL-QoL showed a moderate correlation with IKDC (r = 0.69), GRS (r = 0.55), ACL-RSI (r = 0.50), and TSK-17 (r = -0.49). ACL-QoL presented none to low correlations with the variables of muscle strength, postural stability, and performance in hop tests. The variables related to the knee functional status and psychological factors (IKDC, GRS, ACL-RSI, and TSK-17) were found to be the predictors of QoL (R2 = 0.56; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Knee functional status, psychological readiness, and kinesiophobia were the predictors of knee-related QoL in patients after ACLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results can assist clinicians in the therapeutic monitoring of the factors that may interfere with QoL in patients after ACLR.

Disagreement in Pass Rates Between Strength and Performance Tests in Patients Recovering From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Performance on strength and functional tests is often used to guide postoperative rehabilitation progress and return to activity decisions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Clinicians may have difficulty in determining which criteria to follow if there is disagreement in performance outcomes among the tests.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to compare pass rates between strength tests and single-leg hop (SLHOP) tests among men and women and between patients with lower and higher preinjury activity levels recovering from ACLR. We hypothesized that pass rates would be nonuniformly distributed among test types, sex, and activity level and that more participants would pass hop tests than strength tests.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 299 participants (146 men; 153 women)-at a mean of 6.8 ± 1.4 months after primary, unilateral, and uncomplicated ACLR (mean age, 23 ± 9.7 years; mean height, 172 ± 10.5 cm; mean mass, 75.8 ± 18.4 kg)-completed testing. Quadri.tif strength was evaluated using peak torque during isokinetic knee extension at 90 deg/s and 180 deg/s. Jump distance during the SLHOP and triple hop tests was measured (in cm). Strength and hop test measures were evaluated based on the limb symmetry index ((LSI) = (ACLR / contralateral side) × 100). We operationally defined "pass" as >90% on the LSI.

RESULTS

Pass rates were nonuniformly distributed between isokinetic knee extension at 90 deg/s and the SLHOP test (χ² = 18.64; P < .001). Disagreements between isokinetic testing at 90 deg/s and the SLHOP test occurred in 36.5% (109/299) of the participants. Among those who failed strength testing and passed hop testing, a greater portion reported higher activity levels before their injury (χ² = 6.90; P = .01); however, there was no difference in pass rates between men and women. Similar patterns of disagreement were observed between all strength test and hop test outcomes.

CONCLUSION

ACLR patients with higher activity levels may be more likely to pass hop testing despite failing quadri.tif strength testing. This may be an indicator of movement compensations to achieve jump symmetry in the presence of quadri.tif weakness.

The Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients Waiting for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Worse Than an Age- and Sex-Matched Population: Increasing Time on Waiting List for Surgery Was Independently Associated with a Worse Quality of Life

Background

The aims of this study were to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients awaiting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared to the population at risk: whether knee-specific function was predictive of HRQoL and to identify factors associated with a worse HRQoL.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients (male, n = 50; female, n = 17; mean age, 29) identified from the surgical waiting list completed a questionnaire that included demographics, BMI, time of injury, EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D), Short-Form (SF-36), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. Age- and sex-matched HRQoL data were obtained from population level data.

Results

The mean EQ-5D score for the study cohort was significantly worse than the matched score (difference, 0.367; p < 0.001), and the same trend was observed for all eight dimensions of the SF-36 score. Thirty-three (49%) patients felt their health, in general, was somewhat or much worse compared to one year ago. There was a correlation between IKDC and EQ-5D scores (r = 0.540, p < 0.001). Linear regression was used to formulate the EQ-5D score: EQ-5D = (IKDCx0.013)-0.015 (constant). The SF-36 physical component and length of time on the waiting list were independently associated with the HRQoL, with each 14-point drop or for every 200 days, a clinically significant deterioration in patients' HRQoL occurred, respectively.

Conclusions

Patients had a significantly worse HRQoL when compared to the age- and sex-matched population, which deteriorates with worsening physical function and increasing length of time on the waiting list. The knee-specific IKDC correlated with HRQoL and could be used to estimate the EQ-5D score.

Determining the Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Primary ACL Reconstruction

Background:

Little is known about the threshold of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at which patients perceive to have attained a substantial clinical benefit (SCB) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose:

To determine the SCB value of PROs 1 year after ACLR in the general population and to determine factors that predict SCB attainment.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC-SKF), Tegner, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores were examined postoperatively in 88 patients who underwent ACLR. At the 12-month follow-up visit, the patients answered 2 independent anchor questions about daily discomfort and functional recovery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to differentiate PRO scores between patients who responded as having no difficulty versus some difficulty with daily knee discomfort (anchor question 1) and between patients with substantial recovery versus nonsubstantial recovery of knee function (anchor question 2). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess reliability, and the differences between the AUC values were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors affecting SCB attainment.

Results:

There were 76 patients enrolled in this study. The 12-month Lysholm, IKDC-SKF, Tegner, and ACL-RSI scores that corresponded to the SCB were 88.0, 85.1, 6.5, and 64.2 for anchor question 1 and 84.5, 77.7, 5.5, and 57.1 for anchor question 2, respectively. The AUC values obtained from the ROC curve analyses showed acceptable to excellent reliability (anchor question 1: Lysholm, 0.90; IKDC-SKF, 0.86; Tegner, 0.71; ACL-RSI, 0.92; anchor question 2: Lysholm, 0.80; IKDC-SKF, 0.90; Tegner, 0.82; ACL-RSI, 0.82) and were all statistically significant ( P < .001 to P = .028). For all PROs, younger age (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.88-0.94; P < .001 to P = .027) and greater muscle strength (OR, 1.03-1.07; P < .001 to P = .023) were predictive factors of SCB attainment.

Conclusion:

The postoperative Lysholm, IKDC-SKF, Tegner, and ACL-RSI scores showed acceptable to excellent reliability in predicting the SCB after ACLR in the general population. Age at surgery and thigh muscle strength influenced SCB attainment for all PROs.

Assessing knee functionality: systematic review of validated outcome measures

BACKGROUND

Functional rating scales allow clinicians to document and quantify alterations and progression of recovery processes. There is neither awareness of numerous knee scales nor are they easy to find or compare to select the most suitable.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compile validated knee functional rating tools and analyse the methodological quality of their validation studies. Also, we aimed to provide an operational document of the outcome measures addressing descriptions of parameters, implementations, instructions, interpretations and languages, to identify the most appropriate for future interventions.

METHODS

A systematic review involved a search of PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and Dialnet databases from inception through September 2020. The main inclusion criteria were available functional rating scales/questionnaires/indexes for knees and validation studies. Methodological quality was analyzed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias (COSMIN-RB).

RESULTS

We selected 73 studies. The studies investigated 41 knee rating tools (general, 46%, and specific, 54%) and 71 validations, including 29,742 individuals with knee disorders. QUADAS-2 obtained the best results in patient selection and index test (applicability section). COSMIN-RB showed the highest quality in construct validity (most analyzed metric property). The specific tools were mainly designed for prosthesis and patellofemoral and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. More considered issues were specific function (93%), especially gait, pain/sensitivity (81%), and physical activity/sports (56%).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

We conducted a necessary, useful, unlimited-by-time and feasible compilation of validated tools for assessing knee functional recovery. The methodological quality of the validations was limited. The best validations were for the Copenhagen Knee Range of Motion Scale in osteoarthritis and arthroplasties, Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living and Lysholm Knee Score for general knee disorders and the Tegner Activity Score for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The operational document for the scales provides necessary data to identify the most appropriate.

Supplementary Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis for Residual Anterolateral Rotatory Instability in Patients Undergoing Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background:

The combination of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial.

Purpose:

To determine whether the combination of LET with single-bundle ACLR provides greater control of anterolateral rotatory instability and improved clinical outcomes compared with ACLR alone.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched between inception and July 1, 2020. Level 1 or 2 randomized controlled trials that compared isolated single-bundle ACLR with combined LET with ACLR were included. Data were meta-analyzed for the primary outcome measure of knee stability and the secondary outcome measures of patient-reported outcome scores, return to sports, and graft failure. Dichotomous variables were presented as relative risks (RRs), and continuous variables were presented as mean differences (MDs) and standardized MDs (SMDs).

Results:

A total of 6 studies involving 1010 patients were included. Pooled data showed that the ACLR+LET group had a lower incidence of the pivot shift (RR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.69]; P < .00001), a higher postoperative activity level (MD, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.78]; P = .004), and a lower risk of graft failure (RR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.59]; P < .00001) than did the ACLR group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in primary outcomes including positive Lachman test findings (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.48 to 1.21]; P = .26) or side-to-side differences (SMD, –0.43 [95% CI, –0.95 to 0.09]; P = .11) or in secondary outcomes including International Knee Documentation Committee scores (SMD, 0.25 [95% CI, –0.06 to 0.56]; P = .11) or Lysholm scores (SMD, 0.28 [95% CI, –0.06 to 0.62]; P = .11). Although the overall rate of return to sports was not significantly different between the groups (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.03]; P = .33), the activity level was higher in the ACLR+LET group.

Conclusion:

The addition of LET to primary single-bundle ACLR produced greater knee stability, a higher activity level, and a lower incidence of graft failure than did ACLR alone. There may be a role for adding LET to ACLR for the treatment of ACL injuries.

Two-Year Recall Bias After ACL Reconstruction Is Affected by Clinical Result

Recall bias is a systematic error caused by inaccuracy in reporting past health status and can be a substantial methodological flaw in the retrospective collection of data. Little is known about recall bias following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ recall bias regarding preinjury knee function at 2 years after ACLR.

The Role of Optimism and Psychosocial Factors in Athletes Recovery From ACL Injury: A Longitudinal Study

Despite a growing interest into the role of psychosocial factors during the recovery period following sports injuries, there remains a paucity of longitudinal studies examining the indirect relationships between psychosocial factors, psychological responses, and recovery outcomes. The purpose of this study was to construct and test a conceptual model which examined the indirect relationships between optimism, psychosocial factors, rehabilitation adherence, and perceived knee function up to 12 months post anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. A prospective, longitudinal, and repeated measures design was employed, wherein 81 injured athletes (M_age 26.89, SD = 7.52) completed measures of optimism, psychosocial factors, rehabilitation adherence, and perceived knee function on seven occasions (pre-surgery to 1 year post-surgery). Bayesian structural equation modeling evaluated the hypothesized indirect relationships proposed within the conceptual model. The main findings from this study was empirical support for a time-ordered, conceptual model which demonstrated that pre-surgery optimism had a significant overall indirect effect on perceived knee function at 12 months post-surgery (sum of indirect; αβ = 0.08, post. SD = 0.05, CI [0.01, 0.04]), as well as a specific indirect effect through secondary appraisal at 1 month post-surgery, efficacy at 2 months post-surgery, and rehabilitation adherence at 6 months post-surgery (αβ = 0.03, post. SD = 0.03, CI [0.00, 0.10]). Collectively, this study provides support for a number of previously hypothesized, but not empirically examined, indirect relationships between optimism, psychosocial factors and recovery outcomes. In doing so, we provide a conceptual model which has the potential to help guide individualized treatment recommendations, as well as identify individuals at risk of compromised recovery outcomes following ACL surgery.