Pathogen-specific risk of seizure in children with moderate-to-severe diarrhoea: Case control study with follow-up

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospital Admission and Diagnostic Evaluation for Febrile Seizures in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in hospital admission and diagnostic evaluation for febrile seizure by race and ethnicity.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study among children 6 months to 6 years with simple or complex febrile seizure between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, using data from the Pediatric Health Information System. The primary outcome was hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of encounters with neuroimaging or lumbar puncture. We used mixed-effects logistic regression model with random intercept for hospital and patient to estimate the association between outcomes and race and ethnicity after adjusting for covariates, including seizure type.

RESULTS

In total, 94 884 encounters were included. Most encounters occurred among children of non-Hispanic White (37.0%), Black (23.9%), and Hispanic/Latino (24.6%) race and ethnicity. Black and Hispanic/Latino children had 29% (aOR 0.71; 95% CI 0.66-0.75) and 26% (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.69-0.80) lower odds of hospital admission compared with non-Hispanic White children, respectively. Black and Hispanic/Latino children had 21% (aOR 0.79; 95% CI 0.73-0.86) and 22% (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.71-0.85) lower adjusted odds of neuroimaging compared with non-Hispanic White children. For complex febrile seizure, the adjusted odds of lumbar puncture was significantly greater among Asian children (aOR 2.12; 95% CI 1.19-3.77) compared with non-Hispanic White children. There were no racial differences in the odds of lumbar puncture for simple febrile seizure.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-Hispanic White children, Black and Hispanic/Latino children with febrile seizures are less likely to be hospitalized or receive neuroimaging.

Burden of Shigella in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Shigella remains one of the most common causes of diarrhoea in South Asia. Current estimates of the prevalence of Shigella are critical for guiding control measures. We estimated the prevalence of Shigella species and serogroups in South Asia.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 19 June 2022. We also manually searched the reference lists of the reviewed studies to identify additional studies. We included studies that detected the presence of Shigella in stool by culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Studies associated with outbreaks were excluded. Two investigators independently reviewed the studies, extracted the data and performed quality assessment. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled prevalence of Shigella.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 5707 studies, of which 91 studies from five South Asian countries were included in the systematic review, 79 in the meta-analysis of Shigella prevalence and 63 in the meta-analysis of Shigella serogroups prevalence. The pooled prevalence of Shigella was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6-7%], with heterogeneity (I2 = 98.7; P < 0.01). The prevalence of Shigella was higher in children aged <5 years (10%; 95% CI: 8-11%), in rural areas (12%; 95% CI: 10-14%) and in studies using PCR (15%; 95% CI: 11-19%). Shigella flexneri (58%) was the most abundant serogroup, followed by Shigella sonnei (19%), Shigella boydii (10%) and Shigella dysenteriae (9%). Shigella flexneri 2a was the most frequently isolated serotype (36%), followed by serotype 3a (12%), serotype 6 (12%) and serotype 1b (6%). The prevalence of non-typeable Shigella was 10.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the prevalence of Shigella in South Asia remains generally high, it varies by age group and geographical area, with data lacking in some countries. Effective Shigella vaccines would be advantageous for both endemic communities and travellers.

Global molecular prevalence and genotype distribution of Sapovirus in children with gastrointestinal complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sapovirus (SaV) is an emerging cause of children gastrointestinal complications such as acute gastroenteritis (AGE). The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the global prevalence of the SaV in children and association of infection with SaVs and AGE in children based on case-control studies. Four international databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences and Google Scholar) were used to retrieve English-language studies published between January 2000 and December 2020. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was applied to estimate the overall prevalence, publication bias and heterogeneity index. The pooled prevalence of SaV infection among children with gastroenteritis was 3.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9%-3.9%] based on a random-effects meta-analysis. Genogroup I was the dominant genogroup of SaV in children with gastroenteritis [2.2% (95% CI: 1.6%-3.0%)], association analysis showed that SaV was associated with gastroenteritis [OR: 1.843 (95% CI: 1.27-2.66)]. Given the significant prevalence of the virus in children, it is necessary to pay more attention to this situation. Therefore, preventive health measures in children should be a priority.